<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby, since if officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby, because if officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Officer ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby, as if officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer ramirez found a discarded crowbar nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Officer Ramirez did not find a discarded crowbar nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery, since if the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery, because if the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery, as if the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's alarm system was disabled during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store's alarm system was not disabled during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits, since if a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits, because if a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A homeless man named charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits, as if a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a homeless man named charlie claims to have seen the culprits then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A homeless man named Charlie does not claim to have seen the culprits
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees, since if the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees, because if the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The store owner, richard anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees, as if the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store owner, richard anderson, had a rocky relationship with his employees then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store owner, Richard Anderson, did not have a rocky relationship with his employees
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house, since if sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house, because if sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house, as if sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's missing engagement ring was later found at her ex-boyfriend's house then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's missing engagement ring was not found at her ex-boyfriend's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.