<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore detective bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence detective bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus detective bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that detective bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so detective bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that detective bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that detective bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that detective bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement, since if detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement, because if detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement, as if detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective bennett discovered a hidden safe in the store's basement then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Bennett did not discover a hidden safe in the store's basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the security guard, marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The security guard, Marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the security guard, marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The security guard, Marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the security guard, marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The security guard, Marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the security guard, marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The security guard, Marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the security guard, marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The security guard, Marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the security guard, marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The security guard, Marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the security guard, marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The security guard, Marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the security guard, marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The security guard, Marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The security guard, marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery, since if the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The security guard, Marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The security guard, marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery, because if the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The security guard, Marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The security guard, marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery, as if the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the security guard, marcus, was on vacation during the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The security guard, Marcus, was not on vacation during the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and footprints from muddy boots were found in the store, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Footprints from muddy boots were found in the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and footprints from muddy boots were found in the store, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Footprints from muddy boots were found in the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and footprints from muddy boots were found in the store, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Footprints from muddy boots were found in the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and footprints from muddy boots were found in the store, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Footprints from muddy boots were found in the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and footprints from muddy boots were found in the store, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Footprints from muddy boots were found in the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and footprints from muddy boots were found in the store, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Footprints from muddy boots were found in the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and footprints from muddy boots were found in the store, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Footprints from muddy boots were found in the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and footprints from muddy boots were found in the store, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Footprints from muddy boots were found in the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and footprints from muddy boots were found in the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Footprints from muddy boots were found in the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and footprints from muddy boots were found in the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Footprints from muddy boots were found in the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and footprints from muddy boots were found in the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Footprints from muddy boots were found in the store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store, since if footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store, because if footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store, as if footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If footprints from muddy boots were found in the store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Footprints from muddy boots were not found in the store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby, since if a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby, because if a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby, as if a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a surveillance camera caught a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A surveillance camera did not catch a glimpse of a suspicious van parked nearby
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store had been burglarized once before, five years ago then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store had not been burglarized once before, five years ago
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.