<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder, since if the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder, because if the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder, as if the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's phone records placed them at the scene of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's phone records did not place them at the scene of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect, since if the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect, because if the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect, as if the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim had a history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim had no history of seeking restraining orders against the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's DNA on a piece of evidence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's DNA on a piece of evidence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's DNA on a piece of evidence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's DNA on a piece of evidence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's DNA on a piece of evidence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's DNA on a piece of evidence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's DNA on a piece of evidence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a forensic expert did not identify the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's DNA on a piece of evidence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence, since if a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's DNA on a piece of evidence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence, because if a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's DNA on a piece of evidence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence, as if a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a forensic expert identified the suspect's dna on a piece of evidence then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A forensic expert did not identify the suspect's DNA on a piece of evidence
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect, since if the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect, because if the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect, as if the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's will had been altered, leaving everything to the suspect then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The victim's will had not been altered, leaving everything to the suspect
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder, since if a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder, because if a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder, as if a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing the suspect with a weapon on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.