<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk, since if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk, because if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk, as if the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect's fingerprints were found on the victim's car trunk then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect's fingerprints were not found on the victim's car trunk
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder, since if a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder, because if a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder, as if a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No security camera captured the suspect leaving the victim's home on the night of the murder
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon, since if the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon, because if the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon, as if the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the suspect had recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The suspect had not recently purchased a gun similar to the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home, since if a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home, because if a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home, as if a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten letter addressed to the victim was discovered in the suspect's home then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A handwritten letter addressed to the victim was not discovered in the suspect's home
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the robbery occurred at 8:45 p.m then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The robbery did not occur at 8:45 p.m
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.