<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror, as if a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was written on laura's bathroom mirror then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No threatening message was written on Laura's bathroom mirror
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit, since if john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit, because if john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit, as if john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was in possession of a lock-picking kit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not in possession of a lock-picking kit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was found with a slashed tire, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was found with a slashed tire, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was found with a slashed tire, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was found with a slashed tire, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was found with a slashed tire, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was found with a slashed tire, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was found with a slashed tire, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's car was found with a slashed tire, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's car was found with a slashed tire.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's car was found with a slashed tire.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's car was found with a slashed tire.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's car was found with a slashed tire
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's car was not found with a slashed tire.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's car was not found with a slashed tire.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's car was not found with a slashed tire.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's car was not found with a slashed tire.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's car was not found with a slashed tire.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's car was not found with a slashed tire.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's car was not found with a slashed tire.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's car was not found with a slashed tire.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire, since if laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire, because if laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire, as if laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was found with a slashed tire then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not found with a slashed tire
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness saw John Davis disposing of a backpack
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness saw John Davis disposing of a backpack
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness saw John Davis disposing of a backpack
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness saw John Davis disposing of a backpack
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness saw John Davis disposing of a backpack
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness saw John Davis disposing of a backpack
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness saw John Davis disposing of a backpack
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness saw John Davis disposing of a backpack
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack, since if a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness saw John Davis disposing of a backpack
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack, because if a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness saw John Davis disposing of a backpack
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack, as if a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis disposing of a backpack then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness saw John Davis disposing of a backpack
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed, since if laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed, because if laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed, as if laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's work computer had a hidden camera installed then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's work computer did not have a hidden camera installed
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking other women, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking other women
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking other women, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking other women
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking other women, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking other women
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking other women, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking other women
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking other women, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking other women
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking other women, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking other women
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking other women, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking other women
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking other women, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking other women
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of stalking other women.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking other women
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of stalking other women.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking other women
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of stalking other women.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking other women
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.