<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house, since if a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden cellar was discovered under Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house, because if a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden cellar was discovered under Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house, as if a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden cellar was discovered under Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a secret storage unit, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a secret storage unit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a secret storage unit, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a secret storage unit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a secret storage unit, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a secret storage unit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a secret storage unit, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a secret storage unit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a secret storage unit, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a secret storage unit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a secret storage unit, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a secret storage unit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a secret storage unit, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a secret storage unit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a secret storage unit, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a secret storage unit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a secret storage unit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a secret storage unit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a secret storage unit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a secret storage unit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a secret storage unit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a secret storage unit
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis did not have a secret storage unit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a secret storage unit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis did not have a secret storage unit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a secret storage unit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis did not have a secret storage unit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a secret storage unit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have a secret storage unit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a secret storage unit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis did not have a secret storage unit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a secret storage unit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis did not have a secret storage unit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a secret storage unit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis did not have a secret storage unit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a secret storage unit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis did not have a secret storage unit.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a secret storage unit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a secret storage unit, since if john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a secret storage unit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a secret storage unit, because if john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a secret storage unit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a secret storage unit, as if john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a secret storage unit then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a secret storage unit
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker, since if laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker, because if laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker, as if laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's diary contains mentions of an unknown stalker then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's diary does not contain mentions of an unknown stalker
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street and a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street and a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street and a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around Laura's yard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around Laura's yard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around Laura's yard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around Laura's yard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around Laura's yard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around Laura's yard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around Laura's yard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around Laura's yard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard, since if a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around Laura's yard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard, because if a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around Laura's yard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard, as if a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around laura's yard then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No neighbor saw a mysterious figure lurking around Laura's yard
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of anger management issues, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of anger management issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of anger management issues, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of anger management issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of anger management issues, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of anger management issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of anger management issues, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of anger management issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of anger management issues, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of anger management issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of anger management issues, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of anger management issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of anger management issues, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of anger management issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of anger management issues, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of anger management issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of anger management issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of anger management issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of anger management issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of anger management issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of anger management issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of anger management issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis did not have a history of anger management issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of anger management issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis did not have a history of anger management issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of anger management issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis did not have a history of anger management issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of anger management issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have a history of anger management issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of anger management issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis did not have a history of anger management issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of anger management issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis did not have a history of anger management issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of anger management issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis did not have a history of anger management issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of anger management issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis did not have a history of anger management issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of anger management issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of anger management issues, since if john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of anger management issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of anger management issues, because if john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of anger management issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of anger management issues, as if john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of anger management issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of anger management issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's bank accounts showed suspicious transactions
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.