<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats, since if laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats, because if laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats, as if laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No threatening letter was mailed to Laura's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No threatening letter was mailed to Laura's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No threatening letter was mailed to Laura's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No threatening letter was mailed to Laura's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No threatening letter was mailed to Laura's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No threatening letter was mailed to Laura's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No threatening letter was mailed to Laura's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No threatening letter was mailed to Laura's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, since if a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No threatening letter was mailed to Laura's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, because if a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No threatening letter was mailed to Laura's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, as if a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No threatening letter was mailed to Laura's workplace
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis's fingerprints were not found on laura's safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis's fingerprints were not found on Laura's safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis's fingerprints were not found on laura's safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis's fingerprints were not found on Laura's safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis's fingerprints were not found on laura's safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis's fingerprints were not found on Laura's safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis's fingerprints were not found on laura's safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis's fingerprints were not found on Laura's safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis's fingerprints were not found on laura's safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis's fingerprints were not found on Laura's safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis's fingerprints were not found on laura's safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis's fingerprints were not found on Laura's safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis's fingerprints were not found on laura's safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis's fingerprints were not found on Laura's safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis's fingerprints were not found on laura's safe.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis's fingerprints were not found on Laura's safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis's fingerprints were not found on laura's safe, since if john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis's fingerprints were not found on Laura's safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis's fingerprints were not found on laura's safe, because if john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis's fingerprints were not found on Laura's safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis's fingerprints were not found on laura's safe, as if john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis's fingerprints were found on laura's safe then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis's fingerprints were not found on Laura's safe
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's house was booby-trapped, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's house was booby-trapped
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's house was booby-trapped, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's house was booby-trapped
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's house was booby-trapped, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's house was booby-trapped
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's house was booby-trapped, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's house was booby-trapped
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's house was booby-trapped, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's house was booby-trapped
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's house was booby-trapped, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's house was booby-trapped
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's house was booby-trapped, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's house was booby-trapped
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's house was booby-trapped, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's house was booby-trapped
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's house was booby-trapped.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's house was booby-trapped
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's house was booby-trapped.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's house was booby-trapped
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's house was booby-trapped.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's house was booby-trapped
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's house was not booby-trapped.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's house was not booby-trapped
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's house was not booby-trapped.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's house was not booby-trapped
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's house was not booby-trapped.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's house was not booby-trapped
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's house was not booby-trapped.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's house was not booby-trapped
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's house was not booby-trapped.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's house was not booby-trapped
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's house was not booby-trapped.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's house was not booby-trapped
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's house was not booby-trapped.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's house was not booby-trapped
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's house was not booby-trapped.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's house was not booby-trapped
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's house was not booby-trapped, since if laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's house was not booby-trapped
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's house was not booby-trapped, because if laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's house was not booby-trapped
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's house was not booby-trapped, as if laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's house was booby-trapped then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's house was not booby-trapped
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden cellar was discovered under Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden cellar was discovered under Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden cellar was discovered under Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden cellar was discovered under Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden cellar was discovered under Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden cellar was discovered under Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden cellar was discovered under Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden cellar was discovered under laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden cellar was discovered under Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.