<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently, since if laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently, because if laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently, as if laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, since if a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, because if a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, as if a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs, since if john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs, because if john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs, as if john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's dog was found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's dog was found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's dog was found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet, since if laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet, because if laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet, as if laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.