<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, since if a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, because if a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, as if a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster, since if the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster, because if the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster, as if the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the victim's cellphone was found in a nearby dumpster then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The victim's cellphone was not found in a nearby dumpster
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street and the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street and the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street and the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage, since if the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage, because if the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage, as if the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the murder weapon, a baseball bat, was located in the victim's garage then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The murder weapon, a baseball bat, was not located in the victim's garage
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street and a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street and a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street and a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway, since if a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway, because if a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway, as if a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shoeprint matching the suspect's size was found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street and a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No security camera captured footage of the suspect fleeing the scene
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.