<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis did not have a history of stalking other women.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking other women
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis did not have a history of stalking other women.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking other women
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis did not have a history of stalking other women.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking other women
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have a history of stalking other women.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking other women
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis did not have a history of stalking other women.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking other women
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis did not have a history of stalking other women.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking other women
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis did not have a history of stalking other women.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking other women
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis did not have a history of stalking other women.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking other women
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of stalking other women, since if john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking other women
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of stalking other women, because if john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking other women
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of stalking other women, as if john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking other women then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking other women
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door, since if laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door, because if laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door, as if laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing strange symbols painted on her door then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing strange symbols painted on her door
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street and a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, since if a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, because if a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep, as if a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a suspicious package was left on laura's doorstep then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No suspicious package was left on Laura's doorstep
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of violating restraining orders
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders, since if john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders, because if john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders, as if john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of violating restraining orders then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of violating restraining orders
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street and the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that the stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest, since if the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest, because if the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest, as if the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the stolen car was discovered abandoned in a remote forest then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: The stolen car was not discovered abandoned in a remote forest
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness reported seeing a suspicious figure near the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.