answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"0.85 V"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
}
|
10.1039/C6CP05006A
|
In contrast, the pristine 1:1:0 based PHJ-PSCs yield a lower PCE of 7.82% with Jsc of 15.61 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.85 V and FF of 0.59.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
21988
|
{
"text": [
"52.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
135
]
}
|
10.1016/j.orgel.2016.09.009
|
The best device was achieved with annealing at 100°C for 60min and showed a Jsc (Voc) of 19.98mAcm−2 (0.95V) and a fill factor (FF) of 52.8%, leading to a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 10.04%.It is interesting to compare the PSCs with and without the CH3NH3PbCl3 interlayer.
|
What is the value of FF?
|
9145
|
{
"text": [
"Al"
],
"answer_start": [
116
]
}
|
10.1039/C8TC02906G
|
The device structure was PET/ITO/PEDOT:PSS (35 nm)/NiO (10 nm)/CH3NH3PbI3−xClx (450 nm)/PC61BM (30 nm)/TIPD (10 nm)/Al (110 nm).
|
What is ITO?
|
22172
|
{
"text": [
"765mV"
],
"answer_start": [
161
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227076
|
Besides the remarkable improvement in Jsc, The MH-TNTA based solar cells also exhibit a sustaining increase in Voc values from 722mV for Au-TNTA based device to 765mV for MH-TNTA-3 based ones.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
58360
|
{
"text": [
"12%"
],
"answer_start": [
72
]
}
|
10.1039/C4MH00236A
|
When the ZnO film was doped with Al, the device yielded a higher PCE of 12%, with obviously increased Voc (1.045 V) and FF (0.76).
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
13231
|
{
"text": [
"4.90%"
],
"answer_start": [
7
]
}
|
10.1039/C2JM15420J
|
PCE is 4.90% and 6.07% for CDCA–P1 and CDCA–P2, respectively.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
69109
|
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
}
|
10.1039/C2CP24137D
|
It made Alq3 concentrated on the surface of sensitized TiO2 and shortened the distance between ERD and acceptor dye, thus achieving a higher FRET efficiency.
|
What is ?
|
69377
|
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
79
]
}
|
10.1016/j.saa.2016.03.031
|
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement was carried out under 100 mW/cm2 light illumination in the frequency range of 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz at their open circuit potential.The X-ray diffraction patterns of microwave-hydrothermal synthesized ZnO nanostructures are given in , all the diffraction peaks of ZnO samples can be indexed in hexagonal wurtzite phase (JCPDS 36-1451) with the calculated lattice parameters for all samples a and c of 0.325 and 0.521 nm, respectively.
|
What is the value of illumination?
|
28783
|
{
"text": [
"0.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
}
|
10.1039/C7SE00015D
|
have extended Ru-bipy dye lifetime by replacing the vulnerable NCS− ligands achieving η = 10.1%.
|
What is the value of η?
|
62184
|
{
"text": [
"640 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
28
]
}
|
10.1039/C5RA04862A
|
The lower VOC of ISB-ZnP of 640 mV is likely due to a lowering of the TiO2 Fermi-level consistent with the poorer photocurrent observed (JSC = 5.92 mA cm−2).
|
What is the value of VOC?
|
75626
|
{
"text": [
"17.24±0.87%"
],
"answer_start": [
253
]
}
|
10.1016/j.spmi.2018.03.051
|
The TiO2 nanorod array perovskite solar cells with the Y/Ti molar ratios in the hydrothermal grown solutions of 0%, 3% and 5% exhibited the best photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE) of 16.42%, 18.11% and 17.09%, and the average PCE of 15.79±0.92%, 17.24±0.87% and 16.40±0.69%.The oriented and aligned TiO2 nanorod arrays on a transparent conductive substrate have attracted much attention in the fields of dye-sensitized solar cells [], and organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cells due to their better electron transfer and lower charge recombination [].
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
1572
|
{
"text": [
"0.112%"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
}
|
10.1039/C6TA09582H
|
4c) were also measured, achieving a PCE of 0.124% for BA2PbI4, with a JSC of 0.42 mA cm−2, VOC of 762 mV, and FF of 0.386, whereas obtaining a PCE of 0.112% for n-CsPbI3, with a JSC of 0.46 mA cm−2, VOC of 549 mV and FF of 0.44, respectively.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
12226
|
{
"text": [
"7.83%"
],
"answer_start": [
100
]
}
|
10.1039/C8RA02575D
|
As a result, among the three TPC-based solar cells, device with TPC-2 CE exhibited the highest PCE (7.83%), with an open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) of 0.750 V, a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 15.64 mA cm−2, and fill factor (FF) of 0.668.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
66157
|
{
"text": [
"4.31%"
],
"answer_start": [
273
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.06.046
|
It is found that the overall energy-conversion efficiency of 5.48% is achieved by the formation of P25/HSMM–TiO2 double-layer composite film, which is 51.4% higher than that formed by P25 nanoparticle film (η= 3.62%) and 27.1% higher than that formed by HSMM–TiO2 film (η= 4.31%) under identical film thickness (ca.
|
What is the value of η?
|
47504
|
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
228
]
}
|
10.1016/j.orgel.2012.12.014
|
Nanocrystalline TiO2 photoanodes were prepared using a method reported by Grätzel and coworkers The current–voltage characteristics of the DSSCs were measured using the previously reported method, with a solar simulator (AM1.5, 100 mW/cm2, WXS-1555-10: Wacom Denso Co., Japan) In the present study we used ruthenium bipyridyl complex Ru as the sensitizer and Y3 as co-sensitizer.
|
What is the value of solar?
|
40963
|
{
"text": [
"0.72V"
],
"answer_start": [
271
]
}
|
10.1016/j.polymer.2019.121673
|
In addition, the concentration of the facile synthesis GA6-2.5 co-adsorbent at 0.03 and 0.3mM showed very closed cell performance which implied the cost effect and larger operation window of the cell performance.The Voc values of all the devices are in the range of 0.69–0.72V which are comparable to the HL5 only device (0.72V) and HL5+CDCA based device (0.71V).
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
56744
|
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
}
|
10.1016/j.synthmet.2019.116148
|
Photovoltaic properties of DSSCs were evaluated under solar illumination of AM 1.5G at 100mW/cm2 (metal halide lamp box, calibrated by reference cell Quartz Window, 91,150V, Newport, USA).
|
What is the value of illumination?
|
49221
|
{
"text": [
"70 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
167
]
}
|
10.1039/C7NR08289D
|
The devices with the Co3O4 layer give significantly higher reproducibility with an average PCE value of 10.55 ± 0.69%.We fabricated solar cells with an active area of 70 cm2 to assure the scalability of the spinel cobaltite oxide method.
|
What is the value of active area?
|
16532
|
{
"text": [
"16.54mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
175
]
}
|
10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.12.018
|
Compared with YD2−o−C8, replacing the diarylamine donor with modified DTP unit results in dye JY47 an obviously enhanced Jsc, which increases from 15.68mAcm−2 for YD2−o−C8 to 16.54mAcm−2 for JY47.
|
What is the value of Jsc?
|
31020
|
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
1049
]
}
|
10.1016/j.saa.2013.05.090
|
The two electrodes were clipped together, and a cyanoacrylate adhesive was used as sealant to prevent the electrolyte solution from leaking.The TiO2 film electrode was investigated by X’pert Philips X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation (λ= 1.54056) with accelerating voltage of 40 kV and 30 mA and scan rate 5°/min, Scanning electron microscope (SEM) Quanta 250 FEG (Field Emission Gun), with accelerating voltage 30 kV, magnification 14× up to 1,000,000 and resolution for Gun.1n, and Transmission electron microscope, JEM-2000 EX (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).The absorption spectra of the dye solutions and the dyes adsorbed on TiO2 film electrodes were recorded using a fiber optics UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Ocean optics USB 4000 UV–Vis spectrophotometer).Solar energy conversion efficiency (η) measurements were done using a solar simulator (Xe-500W; Shanghai photoelectricity Device Company, Shanghai, china) which is served as light source; the light intensity being adjusted via a reference standard Si-solar cell at 1sun light intensity of 100 mW/cm2.
|
What is the value of solar?
|
40767
|
{
"text": [
"18.29%"
],
"answer_start": [
236
]
}
|
10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.014
|
The MAPbI3 perovskite film is prepared by two-step sequential solution deposition, and its detailed characterization can be found in our previous studies a, the optimized device based on MAPbI3 (device E) reached a remarkable PCE up to 18.29% (stabilized PCE = 18.21%; see a) was in agreement with the values integrated from IPCE spectrum (21.58 mA cm−2; see c), confirming the accuracy of reported PCE.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
10649
|
{
"text": [
"6.45%"
],
"answer_start": [
285
]
}
|
10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.011
|
Owing to the high electrical conductivity and straightforward electron transport channels for TiO2-Nb/STO CNFs, the device assembled with 10wt% TiO2-Nb/STO CNFs demonstrated the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 7.25%, which was significantly higher than the reference one (6.45%).
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
56543
|
{
"text": [
"0.16 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
84
]
}
|
10.1039/C8RA00004B
|
The sealed DSSCs were used for the photocurrent–voltage test with an active area of 0.16 cm2.The phase and crystal structure of the as-obtained products was characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Shimadzu XRD-6000) with Cu Kα radiation.
|
What is the value of active area?
|
60613
|
{
"text": [
"8.18%"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
}
|
10.1039/C6CS00752J
|
DSSCs using these carbon-based hybrid CEs presented PCEs of 8.41%, 8.34%, 8.18%, 8.09%, 7.93%, 7.76%, 7.75%, 7.69%, and 7.63% respectively.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
66641
|
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
31
]
}
|
10.1039/C5RA11744E
|
The cell had an active area of 0.25 cm2.The current–voltage characteristics were determined by applying an external potential bias to the cell and measuring the photocurrent using a Keithley model 2400 digital source meter.
|
What is the value of active area?
|
71252
|
{
"text": [
"20.06%"
],
"answer_start": [
110
]
}
|
10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103866
|
Therefore, the highest PCE of cell device with S-acetylthiocholine chloride passivation layer is increased to 20.06%, with a 19.7% stabilized output efficiency, which is the highest efficient device among one-step method PEDOT:PSS-based inverted PSCs.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
8850
|
{
"text": [
"SnO2"
],
"answer_start": [
114
]
}
|
10.1039/C7TA09946K
|
The higher mobility of the HTL used could improve charge transport, and the higher injection current from the FTO/SnO2/FBT-Th4/CuxO/Au device compared with FTO/SnO2/spiro-OMeTAD/Au could confirm this argument (Fig.
|
What is FTO?
|
22862
|
{
"text": [
"0.708 ± 0.01 V"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
}
|
10.1039/C0EE00533A
|
Although TNT-170C displayed the highest open-circuit voltage (VOC = 0.708 ± 0.01 V) of all three devices, both the external quantum efficiency (EQE = 21.6 ± 1.8%) and photocurrent density (JSC = 3.50 ± 0.25 mA cm−2) were significantly lower with respect to the other samples.As discussed below, the apparent discrepancy in photovoltaic performance could not be directly assigned to the intrinsic differences between TNT-130C, TNT-150C, and TNT-170C samples, as several effects associated with thin film processing, especially those occurring during film sintering, have been found to significantly modulate the photovoltaic device efficiency.
|
What is the value of VOC?
|
60555
|
{
"text": [
"MAPbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
39
]
}
|
10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.016
|
Additionally, the interface barrier at MAPbI3/ZnO and MAPbI3/ITO was not responsible for the reduction of hysteresis as temperature decreases.
|
What is ITO?
|
3073
|
{
"text": [
"22.22 ± 0.47 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
77
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.01.050
|
The short circuit current density (Jsc) increased to 25.29 ± 0.23 mA/cm2 and 22.22 ± 0.47 mA/cm2, the open circuit voltage (Voc) to 0.73 ± 0.02 V and 0.74 ± 0.02 V, the fill factor (FF) to 0.66 ± 0.01 and 0.71 ± 0.03 and the power conversion efficiency to 11.95 ± 0.45% and 11.12 ± 0.28% respectively.
|
What is the value of Jsc?
|
31725
|
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
500
]
}
|
10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.05.014
|
For example, the DSSC using the TiO2 electrode coadsorbed by FE3T and CDCA ([CDCA]/[dye]=20) is F-C20.To enhance the performance, DSSCs were also fabricated using the electrolyte containing 0.5M of tert-butyl pyridine (TBP) in addition to the above-mentioned component, and their abbreviations are denoted by F-T and P-T for FE3T- and PE3T-sensitized solar cells, respectively.The photocurrent (J)-voltage (V) characteristics were measured using a potentiostat under a simulated solar light (AM 1.5, 100mWcm−2) supplied by a solar simulator (Asahi Spectra HAL-302).
|
What is the value of solar?
|
25278
|
{
"text": [
"0.08%"
],
"answer_start": [
112
]
}
|
10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.07.035
|
As expected, both LC molecules 3N and 3N-1 yield PCE of 0.04% (Jsc=0.19mAcm−2, Voc=455.17mV, and FF=0.5057) and 0.08% (Jsc=0.31mAcm−2, Voc=478.14mV, and FF=0.5320), respectively.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
53934
|
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
38
]
}
|
10.1016/j.powtec.2012.04.037
|
The active area of the TiO2 films was 0.25 cm2.
|
What is the value of active area?
|
38254
|
{
"text": [
"0.2cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
43
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.236
|
The active area of our device was fixed at 0.2cm2.The crystallinity and morphology of the prepared films were characterized by X-ray diffraction (Bruker-AXS D8 advance diffractometer).
|
What is the value of active area?
|
676
|
{
"text": [
"19.03%"
],
"answer_start": [
72
]
}
|
10.1039/C8TA12217B
|
The PSC device with spiro-OMeTAD (PSC-spiro) exhibits an average PCE of 19.03% with a VOC of 1.088 mV, short-circuit current density (JSC) of 22.83 mA cm−2, and fill factor (FF) of 76.59, whereas the PSC device with bare CuSCN (PSC-CuSCN) exhibits an average PCE of 17.59% with a VOC of 1.027 mV, JSC of 22.89 mA cm−2, and FF of 74.84.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
19303
|
{
"text": [
"180 s"
],
"answer_start": [
130
]
}
|
10.1039/C6TA05053K
|
Then the CH3NH3I solution (35 mg mL−1 in IPA) was dropped onto the PbI2 film and allowed to stand for different times from 0 s to 180 s and then spin-coated at 4000 rpm for 40 s.
|
What is the value of time?
|
13977
|
{
"text": [
"48%"
],
"answer_start": [
88
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.060
|
When ZnO content was increased to a weight ratio of 32:1, FF attains its maximum value (48%).
|
What is the value of FF?
|
27152
|
{
"text": [
"0.97 V"
],
"answer_start": [
24
]
}
|
10.1039/C9NJ02074H
|
S5(m), ESI), Voc = 0.95–0.97 V (Fig.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
14815
|
{
"text": [
"12.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
}
|
10.1016/j.orgel.2017.02.011
|
On the other hand, the PCE was largely improved to 12.0% using PFN modifiers, which was in good agreement with the improved Jsc, Voc, and FF of 17.4mA/cm2, 0.95V, and 72.8%, respectively.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
8280
|
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
}
|
10.1039/C7TA09304G
|
Also for the perovskite device, a configuration of FTO/P123-ib film/mesoporous TiO2 + CH3NH3PbI3/spiro-OMeTAD/Au has been demonstrated in Fig.
|
What is perovskite?
|
19464
|
{
"text": [
"9%"
],
"answer_start": [
146
]
}
|
10.1039/C4MH00236A
|
Enhanced IPCE at long wavelengths and a modified perovskite/HTM interface resulted in increased average photocurrent (∼2.8%) and photovoltage (∼1.9%) compared to the non-MAPbI3 overlayer devices, yielding a high PCE of 16.01%, with an average PCE of 15.56%.Grätzel and coworkers fabricated a mixed-cation perovskite (MA)x(FA)1−xPbI3 (x = 0–1) as the active layer via SDP.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
13365
|
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
159
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2019.12.034
|
The EIS parameters obtained from curve fitting supports the current–voltage parameters obtained from I-V characteristic curves.The DSSCs were fabricated using TiO2 photoanodes sensitized with RhB, D149 and N719 dyes along with Gr-PEDOT counter electrode.
|
What is photoanode?
|
28424
|
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
96
]
}
|
10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.11.012
|
We believed that the highest Jsc value was caused by the broadest absorption spectra of DH-6 in TiO2 film which made DH-6 be able achieve most efficient light-harvesting and photon-electron conversion.
|
What is ?
|
41696
|
{
"text": [
"5.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
}
|
10.1039/C4TA06896C
|
80% which is reflected in the higher efficiency of (5) with η = 5.5%.
|
What is the value of η?
|
63288
|
{
"text": [
"8.24%"
],
"answer_start": [
149
]
}
|
10.1039/C4RA07967A
|
Encouragingly, the DSSC from AZ263 with the highest Jsc of 17.83 mA cm−2, which overwhelms the unfavorable effect of Voc, exhibited a PCE as high as 8.24%.In summary, four cyclic thiourea functionalized dyes have been synthesized and their DSSC performances were evaluated as well.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
69856
|
{
"text": [
"0.420 V"
],
"answer_start": [
100
]
}
|
10.1039/C2RA21496B
|
Cells of the hyperbranched copper phthalocyanine 4 exhibited an efficiency of 0.233%, with a VOC of 0.420 V, a JSC of 0.805 mA cm−2, and a FF of 0.688.
|
What is the value of VOC?
|
67133
|
{
"text": [
"0.97 V"
],
"answer_start": [
128
]
}
|
10.1039/C5EE02194D
|
Owing to the decreased WF of Ag (3.97 eV) with the interfacial layer, the device achieved a PCE = 13.4% with an increased Voc = 0.97 V compared to the device without DMAPA-C60 which had a PCE = 9.4% and Voc = 0.9 V.A thin LiF layer was also used as an EEL placed between PC61BM and Al in p–i–n PHJ PrSCs.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
19977
|
{
"text": [
"0.52 V"
],
"answer_start": [
317
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.011
|
An overall solar to electrical energy conversion efficiency (η) of 3.43% was achieved for F-ZnO PA DSSC with a current density (Jsc) of 10.75 mA cm−2, open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.53 V, and fill factor (FF) of 54%, much higher than the performance of the ZnO NR array based DSSC (η= 1.04%, Jsc= 3.66 mA cm−2, VOC= 0.52 V, FF = 48%).
|
What is the value of VOC?
|
50649
|
{
"text": [
"4.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
177
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2014.10.008
|
When irradiated with light at 100 mW cm−2, the DSSC containing the Flemion-based gel electrolyte with 0.6 M DMPII and 0.5 M TBP exhibited an energy conversion efficiency (η) of 4.1%, while η of the acetonitrile-based DSSC was 5.1%.
|
What is the value of η?
|
57073
|
{
"text": [
"1.13V"
],
"answer_start": [
92
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2018.04.027
|
Based on the simulation result, a PCE as high as 22.0% could be obtianed with with a Voc of 1.13V, a FF of 0.82 and a Jsc of 23.83mA/cm2 when the NiO doping concentration was 1×1017cm−3, the NiO thickness was 30nm, the PCBM doping concentration was 1×1019cm−3 and the perovskite absorber layer thickness was 450nm.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
10801
|
{
"text": [
"0.60 V"
],
"answer_start": [
121
]
}
|
10.1039/C3RA22458A
|
When increasing the length of ZnO NW-II to 10 μm, the conversion efficiency can achieve 1.62% (JSC = 7.29 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.60 V, FF = 0.37).
|
What is the value of VOC?
|
67212
|
{
"text": [
"7.04mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
60
]
}
|
10.1016/j.chemphys.2019.03.004
|
The photocurrent density (Jsc) increased fist (from 3.78 to 7.04mAcm−2) but then slightly decreased to 5.90mAcm−2 for the products obtained during 8h hydrothermal reaction.
|
What is the value of Jsc?
|
45760
|
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
496
]
}
|
10.1016/j.orgel.2017.06.048
|
These holes were then sealed by Surlyn® and a cover glass using a soldering iron.Two types of co-sensitization of TiO2 films were accomplished: i) by mixing different volume fractions of the sensitized organic dyes 6–7 with the reference dye N719 at room temperature for 12h and ii) sequential co-adsorption of 12h dipping time of dye N719, followed by 12h dipping in the reported dyes 6–7.A 150W xenon light source (Oriel class a solar simulator, Newport, USA) was used to give an irradiance of 100mWcm−2 (equivalent of one sun at AM 1.5G) at the surface of solar cells.
|
What is the value of solar?
|
39846
|
{
"text": [
"2.06%"
],
"answer_start": [
228
]
}
|
10.1016/j.chemphys.2019.03.004
|
Intensity of rutile XRD peaks decreased (see ) gradually because of intensity decrease of rutile NRs after anatase formation.The current density-voltage (J-V) curves of DSSCs fabricated from these nanoarrays showed improved (by 2.06%) power conversion efficiency (PCE) for the TiO2 hierarchical NR arrays (see ) grown for 2h comparing that of pure rutile TiO2 NR arrays, for which PCE was equal to 1.72%.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
45759
|
{
"text": [
"7.42%"
],
"answer_start": [
33
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2015.10.026
|
The results showed that a PCE of 7.42% was achieved for the DSSC co-modified by GTMs and AgNWs, which was about twice as much as that for the DSSCs only with a TiO2nanoparticle layer (with a PCE of 3.53%).
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
55499
|
{
"text": [
"2.09%"
],
"answer_start": [
242
]
}
|
10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.10.024
|
When we replace the TPA (WY1) electron donor unit with C6-PTZ (WY2) and C6-CBZ (WY3) units, WY2 and WY3 sensitized solar cells give Jsc as 6.22 and 4.18 mA cm−2, Voc as 0.76 and 0.67 V and ff as 0.69 and 0.75, the corresponding η as 3.30 and 2.09%.
|
What is the value of η?
|
39226
|
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
27
]
}
|
10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.02.049
|
A mask with an aperture of 0.25 cm2 is used to define the active area of the test cell.
|
What is the value of active area?
|
37120
|
{
"text": [
"17.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
26
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110197
|
The PCEs were found to be 17.9% and 16.54% respectively, for the backward and forward sweeps, at a scan delay time of 200ms.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
6153
|
{
"text": [
"0.175 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
}
|
10.1039/C6RA16865E
|
The J–V curves (in dark and under illumination) obtained with the planar architecture (active area of 0.175 cm2) are presented in Fig.
|
What is the value of active area?
|
14674
|
{
"text": [
"10.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
160
]
}
|
10.1039/C7NR03963H
|
Consequently, with facile fabrication processing, the PeSCs based on the PEDOT + FrGO HTL showed a significantly higher PCE of 14.9%, compared to a PCE of only 10.3% for the control device based on the single PEDOT HTL.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
17429
|
{
"text": [
"2.10%"
],
"answer_start": [
123
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2014.09.018
|
Efficiency values are observed to increase from 1.21% to 1.43% (SWCNTs), 1.78% to 2.50% (SWCNT–graphene) and from 1.53% to 2.10% (graphene).
|
What is the value of Efficiency?
|
37462
|
{
"text": [
"12.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
57
]
}
|
10.1016/j.cclet.2017.09.038
|
HTM 9 showed a high hole mobility and thus a high PCE of 12.8% at that time.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
7066
|
{
"text": [
"3%"
],
"answer_start": [
78
]
}
|
10.1016/j.ccr.2016.05.008
|
Under these conditions, global photoconversion efficiencies of 4.66% (ηrel = 63%) and 4.42% (ηrel = 60%) are obtained with 15 and 16, respectively (no information on masking or not is provided), breaking the 4% barrier ), particularly attractive for DSSCs because time dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) results showed that the HOMO orbitals have Cu(I)-POP character, whereas the LUMO ones are localized on the bipyridine ligand, assuring a correct dipole orientation with the charge transfer direction towards the anchored acid groups and with the positive charge density on the oxidized sensitizer being located away from the semiconductor.It turned out that the power conversion efficiency of the related solar cell was low (ηrel = 1.7%, ), but this finding can be attributed to a very weak absorption in the visible range.
|
What is the value of η?
|
26638
|
{
"text": [
"12.79%"
],
"answer_start": [
127
]
}
|
10.1039/C7TA00539C
|
The photovoltaic performances of the PSCs fabricated from solution with DMSO and NMP are better than that from pure DMF (PCE = 12.79%, Jsc = 21.08 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.98 V, FF = 0.619).
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
17062
|
{
"text": [
"10.09mA·cm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
145
]
}
|
10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.256
|
The DSSC based on Ni0.5Fe0.5Se2 CE yielded a higher Jsc (15.03mA·cm−2) and FF (0.70) than those of NiSe2 (Jsc=12.88mA·cm−2, FF=0.67), FeSe2 (Jsc=10.09mA·cm−2, FF=0.62) and even Pt CEs (Jsc=13.82mA·cm−2, FF=0.68).
|
What is the value of Jsc?
|
53652
|
{
"text": [
"I3−/I−"
],
"answer_start": [
65
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jre.2017.09.008
|
The liquid electrolyte used here was the solution containing the I3−/I− redox couple and commercially available (CJX-EH, CasJuxin Solar Technology Co., Ltd.).
|
What is redox couple?
|
40452
|
{
"text": [
"0.89 V"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
}
|
10.1039/C4NR06240J
|
For two-step synthesized CH3NH3PbI3, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.89 V, a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 22.57 mA cm−2, and a fill factor (FF) of 64.5%, corresponding to a PCE of 12.95% for the device with a TIPD buffer layer were achieved, which is among the best performances reported in the literature for CH3NH3PbI3/PCBM-based PHJ perovskite solar cells.Patterned FTO glass (sheet resistance: ∼15 Ω sq−1) was purchased from Wuhan Geao Instruments Science & Technology Co., Ltd (China).
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
12352
|
{
"text": [
"1.54 V"
],
"answer_start": [
229
]
}
|
10.1039/C8EE02575D
|
The Prim PVSC device could guide the flow of light inside the device, thus, the four subcells based on MAPbBr3, MAPbIBr2, MAPbI2Br and MAPbI3 active layers could subsequently harvest high-to-low energy photons, generating Voc of 1.54 V, 1.45 V, 1.25 V and 1.15 V, respectively.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
22202
|
{
"text": [
"3.59%"
],
"answer_start": [
110
]
}
|
10.1039/B815649B
|
Here, the DS-6-sensitized cell gave Jsc of 9.46 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.585 V and FF of 0.65, corresponding to only 3.59% of overall conversion efficiencies (η).
|
What is the value of η?
|
76747
|
{
"text": [
"4.68%"
],
"answer_start": [
52
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jre.2018.03.029
|
Three La2MoO6@MWCNTs CE-based DSSCs show the PCE of 4.68%, 4.87% and 5.06% for the mass ratios of 5:1, 3:1 and 1:1, respectively.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
39062
|
{
"text": [
"ZnO"
],
"answer_start": [
20
]
}
|
10.1039/C6TC00702C
|
The 1D structure of ZnO NWs greatly enhances charge collection compared to ZnO NPs.
|
What is ?
|
70654
|
{
"text": [
"0.60 V"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
}
|
10.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.071
|
DSSCs of coadsorbent (CDCA) free KNS1 and KNS2 gave efficiencies 2.01% (Jsc 4.93 mA cm−2, Voc 0.60 V and a FF of 0.68) and (Jsc 6.32 mA cm−2, Voc 0.65 V and a FF of 0.72) 2.95%, respectively.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
29378
|
{
"text": [
"Zn2SnO4"
],
"answer_start": [
25
]
}
|
10.1039/C3NR01133J
|
The present hierarchical Zn2SnO4 macropore structures potentially provide promising performances in photocatalysis, Li-ion batteries and supercapacitors.The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (20873183, U0934003), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-11-0533), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20100171110014).† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: FE-SEM images of 200, 400, 600, 750 nm PS and PS@Zn2SnO4nanoparticles, HRTEM images of Zn2SnO4nanoparticles, electron diffusion coefficient, J–V curves of Zn2SnO4nanoparticles and double layer photoelectrode.
|
What is ?
|
67886
|
{
"text": [
"58.42%"
],
"answer_start": [
209
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2016.10.023
|
The device with an Ag NPs-free compact TiO2 layer 0% Ag-NPs, reference device) shows an average short-circuit current density (JSC), an open-circuit voltage and a fill factor (FF) of 10.96 mA/cm2, 0.72 V, and 58.42% respectively, leading to a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 4.57%.
|
What is the value of FF?
|
10672
|
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
366
]
}
|
10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.11.094
|
Normally, a typical EIS spectrum of DSSC will contain three semicircles, which are assigned to the charge transport resistance (Rct1) at FTO/TiO2 interface or counter electrode/electrolyte interface in high-frequency, to the charge transport resistance (Rct2) at TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface in middle-frequency, and to the Nernst diffusion resistance (Zw) of the I−/I3− redox couple in electrolyte in low-frequency.
|
What is redox couple?
|
50497
|
{
"text": [
"0.42 V"
],
"answer_start": [
116
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.07.006
|
DSSC prepared using ZO0.1 sample exhibited the highest PCE of 0.70%, with its maximum Jsc of 5.43 mA/cm2 and Voc of 0.42 V.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
23692
|
{
"text": [
"6.81%"
],
"answer_start": [
39
]
}
|
10.1039/C5TA06238A
|
Taken together, compared to the PCE of 6.81% for the pristine device, the device assembled with the addition of 8 wt% NaxGdFyOz:Yb/Er@TiO2 hollow spheres exhibited a PCE of 7.58%.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
70353
|
{
"text": [
"12.19mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
82
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.117
|
From 0 to 96h, the Jsc and conversion efficiency of DSSC increases slightly (from 12.19mAcm−2 to 13.53mAcm−2 and 5.74 % to 6.13 %, respectively), we attribute it to the slow stabilization of electrolyte additives on PPy CE In summary, a novel transparent PPy CE has been prepared by in situ polymerization of pyrrole on FTO glass.
|
What is the value of Jsc?
|
57438
|
{
"text": [
"Pt"
],
"answer_start": [
360
]
}
|
10.1039/C3TA13367B
|
This work was also supported by the Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program (10038599, Human Activity Based Green Energy Harvesting and High Efficiency Power Transmission System), funded by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Republic of Korea.† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Impedance data of DSSCs fabricated with UPNS and Pt CEs.
|
What is CEs?
|
70780
|
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
264
]
}
|
10.1016/j.poly.2014.11.008
|
The drilled holes were sealed with a microscope cover slide and Surlyn to avoid leakage of the electrolyte solution.Solar simulator device (Model: CT80AAA, PET Photo Emission Tech., Inc., USA) consisting of 300 W xenon light source was used to give 1 sun AM 1.5G (100 mW/cm2), over the surface of the test cell.
|
What is the value of Solar?
|
44670
|
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
112
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2017.05.088
|
shows J-V curves for DSSCs sensitized with dyes N1–3 under AM 1.5G simulated sunlight with a light intensity of 100 mW/cm2.
|
What is the value of light intensity of?
|
39288
|
{
"text": [
"0.62 V"
],
"answer_start": [
109
]
}
|
10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.03.015
|
The HKK-BTZ4 sensitized cell under standard global AM 1.5 solar condition gave a JSC of 17.9 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.62 V, and FF of 0.66, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency η of 7.30%, while the Ru dye N719-sensitized TiO2 showed an efficiency of 7.82% with a JSC of 17.5 mA/cm−2, a VOC of 0.62 V, and a FF of 0.72, under the same DCA concentration of 80 mM (see To get a further insight into the difference in performance of DSSCs sensitized by all the dyes, density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed at B3LYP/6-31G* level and at TDDFT calculations performed by MPW1 K/631G* in THF by means of CPCM model for the geometry optimization.
|
What is the value of VOC?
|
37099
|
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
72
]
}
|
10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.095
|
Photocurrent-photovoltage (J-V) curves of the DSSCs were measured under 100mWcm−2 with AM 1.5 illuminations (Zolix SS150), and the light intensity was calibrated using a Si solar cell (National Institute of Metrology, China).a illustrates a facile two-step synthetic process for the Co0.85Se/RGO hybrids.
|
What is the value of light intensity?
|
28597
|
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
249
]
}
|
10.1016/j.orgel.2016.10.013
|
As is shown in , PbI2 exhibits obvious diffraction peaks at 12.3°, 25.3°, and 35.5°, respectively a presents the experimental group device configuration of the inverted planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells: Glass substrate/ITO/rGO-PEDOT:PSS/CH3NH3PbI3/PC61BM/Al, from bottom to top.
|
What is perovskite?
|
1703
|
{
"text": [
"0.2 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
18
]
}
|
10.1039/C7DT04825D
|
An active area of 0.2 cm2 was carved out from the photoanodes and immersed in a solution of N719 (Solaronix SA) dye (in an acetonitrile/tert-butanol mixture with a 1:1 ratio) for a planned duration of 24 h for maximum adsorption of the dye.
|
What is the value of active area?
|
62064
|
{
"text": [
"21.43±0.74mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
164
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.018
|
The PSCs with only m-TiO2 and c-TiO2 showed a PCE of 11.59±0.36% (with JSC=21.99±1.08mAcm−2, VOC=0.96±0.005V, and FF=55.4±1.27%) and a PCE of 14.53±0.38% (with JSC=21.43±0.74mAcm−2, VOC=1.03±0.008V, and FF=66.6±2.63%), respectively.
|
What is the value of JSC?
|
284
|
{
"text": [
"1.02V"
],
"answer_start": [
112
]
}
|
10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.112
|
The PCE of champion NH4F-PSC with forward scan slightly decreases to 14.48% with a isc of 21.30mAcm−2, a Voc of 1.02V, and a FF of 66.65%, by contrast, the forward PCE for the device with pristine TiO2 drops sharply to 10.85% with a isc of 18.95mAcm−2, a Voc of 0.90V, and a FF of 63.61%.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
1178
|
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
34
]
}
|
10.1039/C7SE00122C
|
This solution is dropped onto the FTO substrate surface with a dense layer of titanium dioxide, and a (SCN−)-doped perovskite precursor film is formed by spin coating for 30 s at 2000 rpm to develop the film of discrete islands after annealing at 100 °C for 60 min.
|
What is substrate?
|
22184
|
{
"text": [
"813mV"
],
"answer_start": [
88
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.279
|
In contrast, the co-doped TiO2 NRAs based perovskite solar cell has Voc, Jsc, and FF of 813mV, 18.70mA/cm2, and 64%, respectively.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
3788
|
{
"text": [
"Pt"
],
"answer_start": [
135
]
}
|
10.1039/C8TA12558A
|
The CE based on Co–Cu–WSx BHSs exhibited a PCE of 9.61%, which is higher than those of ternary Co–WSx (9.14%) and Co–CuSx (8.56%), and Pt (8.24%).
|
What is CE?
|
74303
|
{
"text": [
"2%"
],
"answer_start": [
138
]
}
|
10.1039/C4EE01724B
|
Many developments have been seen in the scalable production of DSMs such as the fabrication of modules with certified η values of up to 8.2%, the emergence of s-DSCs and s-DSMs to enhance device lifetimes, the initiation of flexible DSMs and their low temperature processing, long term stability and thermal testing of transparent conducting oxide (TCO)-based DSCs up to 80 °C, and their application as smart windows.
|
What is the value of η?
|
68558
|
{
"text": [
"1.13%"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
}
|
10.1039/C2RA22518B
|
As a result, the η increased significantly from 0.66% for the nanorods to 1.13% for the hierarchical architectures due to the increase of JSC.
|
What is the value of η?
|
75293
|
{
"text": [
"9.07%"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
}
|
10.1016/j.carbon.2016.05.018
|
η was almost the same as that of the DSSC employing the Pt/FTO electrode (9.07%).
|
What is the value of η?
|
52517
|
{
"text": [
"0.74 V"
],
"answer_start": [
231
]
}
|
10.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.197
|
As can be seen, the solar cell fabricated with electrolyte A using single PEO as gelator shows an overall conversion efficiency of 5.43% with a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) = 11.02 mA cm−2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) = 0.74 V and fill factor (FF) = 0.70, while the solar cell fabricated with electrolyte E using single PEG as gelator has a slightly higher efficiency of 5.79% with Jsc= 13.23 mA cm−2,Voc= 0.67 V and FF= 0.65.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
44014
|
{
"text": [
"3.73%"
],
"answer_start": [
37
]
}
|
10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.264
|
The FDSSC with ZrO2/C reaches a η of 3.73%, with a JSC of 9.85mAcm−2, VOC of 0.74V, and FF of 51.13%.
|
What is the value of η?
|
47526
|
{
"text": [
"8.98 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
98
]
}
|
10.1016/j.matlet.2017.02.099
|
Specimens containing 5wt% Zn nanoparticles showed a maximum efficiency of 1.34% with 0.79VVoc and 8.98 mA/cm2Jsc.
|
What is the value of Jsc?
|
29427
|
{
"text": [
"13.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
157
]
}
|
10.1039/C9TA01681C
|
Devices with the TPA-2,7-FLTPA-TPA HTM yielded the highest efficiency of up to 17.1%, while the PCE of TPA-3,6-FLTPA-TPA based devices is found to be around 13.9% and the reference ones with the TaTm HTM displayed a PCE of 15.9%.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
15728
|
{
"text": [
"14.83%"
],
"answer_start": [
47
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.005
|
However, the PCE of the pristine TiO2 was only 14.83% in the reverse-direction scan of the J-V curve and 9.94% in its forward-direction scan, which was much lower than that extracted from the reverse-direction scan of the J-V curve.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
2147
|
{
"text": [
"783 ± 26 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
156
]
}
|
10.1039/C8TA06948D
|
I−/I3− system showed a power conversion efficiency of 5.79% with an open circuit voltage (Voc), short circuit current density (Jsc) and fill factor (FF) of 783 ± 26 mV, 12.28 ± 0.71 mA cm−2, and 0.60 ± 0.01, respectively.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
76444
|
{
"text": [
"0.69 V"
],
"answer_start": [
12
]
}
|
10.1039/C3TA01339A
|
3.9% (Voc = 0.69 V and Jsc = 9.1 mA cm−2), which was enhanced to ca.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
63744
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.