answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"4.21%"
],
"answer_start": [
128
]
}
|
10.1016/j.tet.2016.04.044
|
The overall power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the cell based on of X69 measured under AM 1.5 irradiation (100mWcm−2) reached 4.21%, and the short–circuit photocurrent density (JSC), open–circuit photovoltage (VOC) and fill factor (FF) of X69cell are 12.10mAcm−2, 520mV and 0.67, respectively.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
24989
|
{
"text": [
"15.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
65
]
}
|
10.1039/C6NR01010E
|
The best device based on TiO2 nanorods showed the highest PCE of 15.5% with VOC of 1.02 V, JSC of 20.0 mA cm−2, and a remarkably high FF of 76.1%.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
21045
|
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
16
]
}
|
10.1016/j.orgel.2017.06.004
|
The as prepared TiO2 electrodes and CE were sandwiched by using 60μm thick surlyn spacer (surlyn-1702, Dupont).
|
What is ?
|
48311
|
{
"text": [
"5.22%"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.141
|
Similarly, higher PCEs were obtained by device fabricated with FS-16/E1 (6.55%) and FS-18/E1 (5.22%) than that with FS-16/E2 (5.80%) and FS-18/E2 (4.57%).
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
37281
|
{
"text": [
"8.87%"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
}
|
10.1016/j.tet.2017.05.020
|
Notably, Devices with Q221 and Q222 show comparable PCE of 10.37% and 8.87% under a low doping condition of additives (Li-TFSI/TBP, 15 mM/100mM) to that of 10.05% and 8.66% under the high doping condition (Li-TFSI/TBP, 30 mM/200mM).
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
2572
|
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
32
]
}
|
10.1016/j.carbon.2011.07.012
|
The introduction of MA-CNC into TiO2 photoanode suppressed charge recombination at the MA-CNC-TiO2/electrolyte interface with higher charge resistance (Rct) as well as increased electron lifetime (τn) within the cell and hence higher photovoltaic performance.
|
What is photoanode?
|
32661
|
{
"text": [
"10.15mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
57
]
}
|
10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.12.037
|
The solar cell without TPBi has a Voc of 0.95V, a Jsc of 10.15mA/cm2, an F.F.
|
What is the value of Jsc?
|
1601
|
{
"text": [
"12.42%"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
}
|
10.1039/C6TA10588B
|
As a result, the PSCs on the PEDOT:PSS/PEI substrate exhibited a significantly high PCE of 12.42% without obvious hysteresis.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
15536
|
{
"text": [
"12.56 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
174
]
}
|
10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.174
|
The JSC for the H-electrode decreased from 18.41 mA/cm2 for the liquid electrolyte device to 15.41 mA/cm2 for the PGE device, and the JSC for the NP-electrode decreased from 12.56 mA/cm2 for the liquid electrolyte device to 8.72 mA/cm2 for the PGE device.
|
What is the value of JSC?
|
46015
|
{
"text": [
"13.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
157
]
}
|
10.1016/j.spmi.2017.10.027
|
As a result, when the mole ratio of CH3NH3Br/CH3NH3I was 3:7 in precursor solution, the stable PCE of the corresponding devices under illumination can reach 13.8%, and the stability of the devices in humid air under illumination was improved.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
4664
|
{
"text": [
"0.71%"
],
"answer_start": [
79
]
}
|
10.1039/C7TC04952H
|
The best PCE data for each chalcogenide NCs are: 1.1% for FeS2, 1.6% for Cu2S, 0.71% for SnS, 0.06% for SnSe, 4.87% for Bi2S3, 6.0% for CZTS, 9.3% for CZTSSe, 9.4% for CZTGeSSe, 7.1% for ACZTSe and 6.3% for CZTGeS.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
17801
|
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
185
]
}
|
10.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.021
|
Its irradiant power was adjusted with respect to a Si reference solar cell (Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy System: Mono-Si + KG filter) to approximately one sun light intensity (100 mW/cm2).
|
What is the value of light intensity?
|
47218
|
{
"text": [
"775mV"
],
"answer_start": [
120
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.138
|
The best efficiency of QX12-based cell reached about 95% of the commercial Ru(II) polypyridyl dye N719-based cell (Voc: 775mV; Jsc: 16.1mAcm−2; PCE: 8.07%) which was fabricated and measured under the same standard conditions, indicating indeno[1,2-b]indole can be used a promising electron donor to construct efficient metal-free organic dyes for DSSCs.To further investigate the reason for the different Jsc values of the four dyes, the IPCE spectra of QX11–14 have been measured.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
26389
|
{
"text": [
"6.26%"
],
"answer_start": [
71
]
}
|
10.1039/C8DT03296C
|
2d), the devices have stabilized PCE outputs for over 120 s, which are 6.26%, 7.52%, 6.92%, and 6.3%.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
22813
|
{
"text": [
"555 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
165
]
}
|
10.1039/C5RA20294A
|
6 and Table 2.Among the five cyclometalated ruthenium dyes studied, 4b shows the best photovoltaic performance, which exhibits an open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) of 555 mV, a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 9.85 mA cm−2, a fill-factor (FF) of 0.67, and η of 3.7%, respectively.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
69434
|
{
"text": [
"24.21mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
}
|
10.1016/j.orgel.2019.07.007
|
DMSO outperformed other devices with short circuit current density (Jsc) of 24.21mAcm−2, open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.954V, fill factor (FF) of 0.61, and PCE of 14.11%.
|
What is the value of Jsc?
|
6648
|
{
"text": [
"18.11%"
],
"answer_start": [
160
]
}
|
10.1016/j.spmi.2018.03.051
|
The TiO2 nanorod array perovskite solar cells with the Y/Ti molar ratios in the hydrothermal grown solutions of 0%, 3% and 5% exhibited the best PCE of 16.42%, 18.11% and 17.09%, and the average PCE of 15.79±0.92%, 17.24±0.87% and 16.40±0.69%.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
1567
|
{
"text": [
"0.94 V"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
}
|
10.1039/C5TA02507A
|
The PSSC device with HTM 10 showed a PCE of 9.1% with a high Voc of 0.94 V and a Jsc of 16.3 mA cm−2, compared to spiro-OMeTAD (Jsc of 16.8 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.91 V, FF of 67.1% and PCE of 10.2%).Neil et al., reported (HTM 13 and HTM 14, Fig.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
18142
|
{
"text": [
"0.755 V"
],
"answer_start": [
121
]
}
|
10.1039/C3TA10925A
|
As is indicated, TNF-D had a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 8.6 mA cm−2, open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) of 0.755 V and fill factor (FF) of 0.63 with a power conversion efficiency (η) of 4.09%.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
63879
|
{
"text": [
"67.7 nmol/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
286
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.091
|
After TiO2 modification, the JSC increases from 4.50 mA/cm2 to 7.01 mA/cm2, resulting in a significant improvement of PCE from 2.75% to 3.70%, while the Voc decreases from 0.755 V to 0.690 V.The TiO2 modification results in the enhancement of dye-adsorbed amounts from 55.8 nmol/cm2 to 67.7 nmol/cm2.
|
What is the value of amount?
|
32181
|
{
"text": [
"3.60%"
],
"answer_start": [
152
]
}
|
10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.12.028
|
Compared with QX16, the dye QX17 with a DCRD acceptor exhibited a relatively better DSSC performance (a Voc of 695mV, a Jsc of 7.10mAcm−2, and a PCE of 3.60%).
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
48330
|
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
253
]
}
|
10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.01.010
|
In the Nyquist diagram, Rs information in the high-frequency region is included, as well as the Rct at the counter electrode/electrolyte interface and the Nernst diffusion resistance in the low-frequency region [Rs represents the resistance between the FTO substrate and the counter electrode [].
|
What is substrate?
|
42034
|
{
"text": [
"15.49%"
],
"answer_start": [
157
]
}
|
10.1039/C7RA01303E
|
The best device performance was observed with the V2O5 and Bphen modified layer films compared to the other three types of cell devices, and a stable PCE of 15.49% was achieved.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
16374
|
{
"text": [
"7.13%"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
}
|
10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.034
|
The DSSCs based on TiO2 photoelectrodes with 14.5 μm depict the superior PCE of 7.13% over another.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
23973
|
{
"text": [
"0.80 V"
],
"answer_start": [
43
]
}
|
10.1039/C4CC07367C
|
S2 in ESI, the Voc of these cells is about 0.80 V, nearly the same as that of solar cells with TiO2 NWs as photoanodes.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
19559
|
{
"text": [
"7.15%"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
}
|
10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.10.004
|
The PANI CE exhibited higher electrocatalytic performance for the I−/I3− redox reaction than the Pt electrode and achieved a PCE of 7.15%, over 0.25% higher than the PCE value for the Pt-based CE Due to its high conductivity, stability and nanoporous structure, PEDOT was found to be an efficient catalyst for DSSCs.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
31201
|
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
281
]
}
|
10.1016/j.optmat.2019.04.014
|
In a large contrast, the rGO nanosheets decreased the intensity of EQE spectra by destroying the perovskite grains and photovoltaic characteristics.The rGO, rGO-g-P3HT, and rGO-g-PTEt precursors were used to improve the morphological, optical, and photovoltaic properties of FTO/b-TiO2/mp-TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3/spiro-OMeTAD/MoO3/Ag perovskite solar cells.
|
What is FTO?
|
10046
|
{
"text": [
"glass"
],
"answer_start": [
148
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.12.135
|
A double-layer TiO2 photoelectrode (15+5) μm in thickness with a 15μm thick nanoporous layer and a 5μm thick scattering layer printed on conducting glass substrate was used.
|
What is substrate?
|
26456
|
{
"text": [
"0.36 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
183
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solmat.2013.05.012
|
3–4 μm of TiO2 with particle size over 100 nm (Ti-Nanoxide R/SP, Solaronix) on top of the previously prepared 12 µm transparent electrodes.The active area of the prepared devices was 0.36 cm2 and for accurate measurement a black mask was used during photovoltaic characterization.The DSSC devices were submitted to accelerated aging test for 1200 h in a solar simulator with a light intensity of 100 mW/cm2 (full sun, AM 1.5 G) at 333 K and ambient relative humidity, following the ISOS-L-2 protocol Quasi-solid electrolytes were prepared by dispersing the NaSAPx samples (5 wt%) in 3-methoxypropionitrile based electrolyte (Z-946).
|
What is the value of active area?
|
58438
|
{
"text": [
"20.83±0.77 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
61
]
}
|
10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.055
|
For the IPA CH3NH3PbI3−xClx PSCs, JSC is greatly improved to 20.83±0.77 mA/cm2 with a slightly increased FF (81.5±0.5) and VOC (1.00±0.01 V), which makes the average PCE improved to 17.3%.
|
What is the value of JSC?
|
2295
|
{
"text": [
"12.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
}
|
10.1039/C4TA05352D
|
This simple modification of the cathode interface showed a remarkable enhancement of power conversion efficiency (PCE) from 12.4% to 15.0% and also reduced the hysteresis of photocurrent.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
16389
|
{
"text": [
"3.64%"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
}
|
10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.077
|
η increases from 6.07% (N719, TiO2 only) and 3.02% (CSD-01, TiO2 only) to 6.71% (N719, 0.3 mol Yb2O3) and 3.64% (CSD-01, 0.3 mol Yb2O3), respectively.
|
What is the value of η?
|
33778
|
{
"text": [
"8.33%"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
}
|
10.1039/C8QM00337H
|
Moreover, the CsPbBr3 PSCs tailored with PEDOT, PPy and PANi HTMs present PCEs of 8.36%, 8.33% and 7.69%, respectively.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
18783
|
{
"text": [
"∼0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
48
]
}
|
10.1016/j.cej.2015.01.065
|
The cell was designed to have an active area of ∼0.25 cm2.Field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, Hitachi S-7400, Japan) was used to study the surface morphology of the as-obtained nanofibers.
|
What is the value of active area?
|
38345
|
{
"text": [
"1.45 V"
],
"answer_start": [
45
]
}
|
10.1039/C4RA07539K
|
In addition, the Voc of the TCO-less T-DSSC (1.45 V) is the sum of the Voc observed for the top cell (0.76 V) and the bottom cell (0.68 V), confirming the successful formation of a tandem cell.In the next step, in order to remove the TCO layer completely from the bottom cell, a TCO-less T-DSSC was fabricated using a back-contact TCO-less bottom cell sensitized with N719 dye, in which the Pt-coated FTO was replaced with Pt-coated Ti foil as the counter electrode using the device architecture shown in Fig.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
74582
|
{
"text": [
"5.19%"
],
"answer_start": [
75
]
}
|
10.1016/j.tsf.2015.10.013
|
It is observed that 0.2 wt.% Ag@TiO2 core–shell NCs led to the best PCE of 5.19% with the optimized RGO, and the excess amount (0.3 wt.% Ag@TiO2) showed a detrimental effect on DSSC performance.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
56129
|
{
"text": [
"0.59 V"
],
"answer_start": [
185
]
}
|
10.1016/j.electacta.2012.06.127
|
Therefore, the uniform structure of deposited films can enhance electron-transfer kinetics The observed Jsc, Voc and FF values for the DSSCs prepared by spin coating were 7.05 mA cm−2, 0.59 V and 0.59 (DSSCs with raw MWCNT counter electrodes), 9.51 mA cm−2, 0.68 V and 0.62 (DSSCs with purified MWCNT counter electrodes) and 9.95 mA cm−2, 0.78 V and 0.64 (DSSCs with purified and ground MWCNT counter electrodes), respectively.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
24116
|
{
"text": [
"100 mW·cm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
115
]
}
|
10.1016/j.mseb.2017.03.006
|
The cell performance was measured by a solar simulator (Peccell, PE-L111, Japan) system under a light intensity of 100 mW·cm−2.
|
What is the value of solar?
|
50094
|
{
"text": [
"9.35±0.08mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
92
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2019.05.051
|
The obtained J-V plots are given in TPAA6 exhibited a short circuit current density (Jsc)of 9.35±0.08mAcm−2, open circuit voltage (Voc) of 593±43mV and fill factor (FF) of 0.64±0.01, yielding an efficiency of 3.56±0.05%.
|
What is the value of Jsc?
|
36635
|
{
"text": [
"20.98%"
],
"answer_start": [
147
]
}
|
10.1039/C9TA05422G
|
The optimised 10 nm SnO2 top layer on the TiO2 layer facilitates effective charge separation resulting in an improvement in the PCE from 17.03% to 20.98% with better air stability.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
15284
|
{
"text": [
"5.29%"
],
"answer_start": [
163
]
}
|
10.1039/C0CC04948D
|
The short-current density (Jsc), the open-circuit voltage (Voc), the fill factor (FF) and the overall conversion efficiency (η) are 9.75 mA cm−2, 838 mV, 0.65 and 5.29%, respectively.
|
What is the value of η?
|
66443
|
{
"text": [
"15.37%"
],
"answer_start": [
37
]
}
|
10.1039/C5TA01824B
|
More importantly, the average PCE is 15.37% with a very small s.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
15209
|
{
"text": [
"0.71 V"
],
"answer_start": [
78
]
}
|
10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.012
|
The DSSC with the MWCNT CE shows a lowest open-circuit voltage (VOC) value of 0.71 V.
|
What is the value of VOC?
|
55682
|
{
"text": [
"14.62%"
],
"answer_start": [
156
]
}
|
10.1016/j.mssp.2019.104671
|
The pristine short-circuit current density (JSC), open circuit voltage (VOC), fill factor (FF), and PCE of the device a are 21.39mAcm−2, 1.02V, 66.99%, and 14.62%, respectively.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
3250
|
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
47
]
}
|
10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.01.022
|
The incident light intensity was calibrated to 100mWcm−2 with a standard silicon solar cell.
|
What is the value of light intensity?
|
45484
|
{
"text": [
"14.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
111
]
}
|
10.1039/C4EE00942H
|
Using this technique, it is possible to fabricate devices with an average PCE of 13.4% and record values up to 14.9% under the AM1.5G simulated solar spectrum (Fig.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
22433
|
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
140
]
}
|
10.1039/C5CP05986K
|
On the other hand, the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) levels of the three dyes are more positive than the redox potential of the I−/I3− redox couple (0.40 V vs.
|
What is redox couple?
|
70426
|
{
"text": [
"17.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
282
]
}
|
10.1016/j.tsf.2019.03.030
|
Therefore, as in the case of TEC15/HT-TiO2, glass/TEC10/LT-TiO2/Perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag structure with TSC of 0, 0.05, 0.1M were fabricated, and the J–V curves and photovoltaic parameters are shown in Even with TEC10/LT-TiO2, PCEsRS were the best at TSC 0.05M, and its PCEs were 17.8% (13.8%) with JSC=23.5 (23.2) mA·cm−2, VOC=1.04 (0.976) V, and FF of 72.8% (61.0%) for the RS (FS).
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
748
|
{
"text": [
"10.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
61
]
}
|
10.1039/C7TC04649A
|
proved that 1 μm long TiO2 nanorod film resulted in a PCE of 10.0%, which was found to be better than the previous results reported by Kim and colleagues.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
16780
|
{
"text": [
"5.55%"
],
"answer_start": [
221
]
}
|
10.1039/C4TA04208E
|
Their overall conversion efficiencies (η) were calculated to be 8.37% and 8.26%, hence both are superior to that obtained for the asymmetric sensitizer TFRS-80b, with JSC = 9.81 mA cm−2, VOC of 780 mV, FF = 0.725 and η = 5.55%.
|
What is the value of η?
|
65189
|
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
20
]
}
|
10.1016/j.mssp.2014.05.016
|
Then dye-sensitized TiO2 NPs based solar cells were fabricated on the GZO film grown at 350 °C (the highest transmittance in NIR region after annealing at 500 °C for 30 min) and 300 °C (the lowest sheet resistance after annealing at 500 °C for 30 min).
|
What is ?
|
41484
|
{
"text": [
"7.08%"
],
"answer_start": [
308
]
}
|
10.1039/C8CC06791K
|
The methoxy anchors for M104, KM05, and KM07 have been widely studied and used to generate efficient adsorption/attachment on the perovskite surface, while the methylthio group on KM03 was found to be a less efficient anchoring group, thus resulting in a lower Jsc and FF that correspond to an inferior PCE (7.08%).
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
17100
|
{
"text": [
"0.94 V"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
}
|
10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.02.206
|
The MAPbI3-0prefilm −based cell exhibits a short-circuit photocurrent density (JSC) of 17.65 mA cm−2, open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.94 V, and fill factor (FF) of 54.3%, yielding a power conversion efficiency of 9.11%.
|
What is the value of VOC?
|
9362
|
{
"text": [
"16.59%"
],
"answer_start": [
83
]
}
|
10.1039/C8TC01570H
|
Consequently, the average PCE of the DMSO-added PSCs was significantly improved to 16.59% (original PCE = 12.88%), which was mainly caused by the enhancement in the short-circuit current density (Jsc, from 20.90 to 22.31 mA cm−2) and the fill factor (FF, from 0.63 to 0.75).
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
20100
|
{
"text": [
"15.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
33
]
}
|
10.1039/C6TA10305G
|
As a result, a remarkable PCE of 15.1% was achieved.The deposition method of the perovskite layer in ETL-free devices was also investigated.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
20234
|
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
24
]
}
|
10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.189
|
S3, MAPbI3/2-OMe/c-TiO2/FTO).
|
What is ?
|
5361
|
{
"text": [
"CNTs-MoS2-carbon"
],
"answer_start": [
19
]
}
|
10.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.075
|
The DSSCs based on CNTs-MoS2-carbon CEs achieve a high power conversion efficiency of 7.23%, which is higher than Pt CEs (6.19%).Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at
|
What is CE?
|
32375
|
{
"text": [
"8.29%"
],
"answer_start": [
146
]
}
|
10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.020
|
Herein, the device made from PPA CE exhibited a comparable Jsc value, and yielded a distinguished electrochemical performance and the PCE reached 8.29% compared to the Pt counterpart (8.24%) in DSCs, which are consistent with the below electrochemical characterizations.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
42658
|
{
"text": [
"78.31%"
],
"answer_start": [
153
]
}
|
10.1039/C6QM00097E
|
The mp-SFX-2PA based devices with this mixed perovskite layer exhibit a maximum PCE of 17.70%, with a JSC of 20.87 mA cm−2, a VOC of 1083 mV and a FF of 78.31%.
|
What is the value of FF?
|
22331
|
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
2
]
}
|
10.1039/C7CP07682G
|
A CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite precursor solution was prepared by dissolving 576 mg PbI2, and 199 mg CH3NH3I in a 4:1 vol solution of DMF:DMSO.
|
What is perovskite?
|
17503
|
{
"text": [
"59.48%"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
}
|
10.1016/j.matlet.2018.02.085
|
amentacea was 5.08% and 4.43%, with FF of 59.48% and 57.39% respectively.
|
What is the value of FF?
|
41733
|
{
"text": [
"1.40 V"
],
"answer_start": [
146
]
}
|
10.1039/C4EE00762J
|
We found that a deeper HOMO resulted in a significantly larger Voc, which enabled us to fabricate high-efficiency solar cells with a Voc of up to 1.40 V and a fill factor (FF) of 79% as well as a PCE of 6.7%.Efficient and inexpensive energy harvesting by solar cells is a great challenge for the 21st century in the field of renewable energy.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
15917
|
{
"text": [
"1.05 V"
],
"answer_start": [
105
]
}
|
10.1039/C8TA08503J
|
The PSC device made with doped SAF-OMe (37) achieved a PCE of 16.73% with a JSC of 21.07 mA cm−2, VOC of 1.05 V, and FF of 0.76, which meant it outperformed the doped spiro-OMeTAD-based device with a PCE of 14.84% under identical conditions.
|
What is the value of VOC?
|
14518
|
{
"text": [
"15.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
}
|
10.1039/C7TA01651D
|
As a consequence, the PCE of the CIGS bottom solar module decreases from 15.7% to 5.8%.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
20035
|
{
"text": [
"0.82 V"
],
"answer_start": [
75
]
}
|
10.1039/C4MH00236A
|
Devices fabricated by the OSPD method yielded a Jsc of 8.2 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.82 V, FF of 0.77 and PCE of 5.2% while a PCE of 7.4% was obtained using SDP, with a Jsc of 10.8 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.91 V, and FF of 0.76 under AM1.5G illumination (100 mW cm−2).Around the same time, Snaith, Bolink, and Yang reported independently several perovskite PHJ solar cells with high PCEs up to or over 10%.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
13333
|
{
"text": [
"19.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
61
]
}
|
10.1016/j.cclet.2019.08.022
|
It was found that Y1A1-based i-DSSCs exhibited a high PCE of 19.5% under illumination intensity of 350 lx (LED light), much higher than that of 9.22% under AM1.5 G condition.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
50790
|
{
"text": [
"1.01V"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
}
|
10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.163
|
The champion lc-SnO2 device shows a short-circuit photocurrent-density (Jsc) of 20.88mAcm−2, a Voc of 1.01V, a FF of 65.72% and a PCE of 13.84% at backward scanning and Jsc of 20.75mAcm−2, Voc of 1.02V, FF of 56.21% and PCE of 11.19% at forward scan direction.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
6956
|
{
"text": [
"9.23mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
121
]
}
|
10.1016/j.apt.2018.03.008
|
Compared with Cell-S, Cell-D has a lower Voc (0.796V), a similar FF (72.05%), whereas it demonstrates a much higher Jsc (9.23mAcm−2).
|
What is the value of Jsc?
|
36045
|
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
158
]
}
|
10.1039/C6TA07655F
|
Thus, the IPCE values of dye LI-76–LI-78 were higher than that of LI-75, mainly due to the enhancement of the electron collection efficiencies (ηcoll) to the FTO substrate (Fig.
|
What is substrate?
|
72590
|
{
"text": [
"10.26Ωcm2"
],
"answer_start": [
324
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.074
|
It is noticed that the values of Rs (14.80 & 16.78Ωcm2) for CuS/WS2 and CuS/MoS2 CEs are similar, but higher than that of the Pt CE (9.35Ωcm2) due to their semiconducting behavior (), affects the fill factor, and the performance of DSSCs (The Rct of Pt and CuS/WS2 CE (3.66 & 6.53Ωcm2) is smaller than that of CuS/MoS2 CEs (10.26Ωcm2), manifesting the higher electrocatalytic reduction of I3− which could enhance the FF of DSSCs ().
|
What is the value of Rct?
|
58137
|
{
"text": [
"3.16"
],
"answer_start": [
141
]
}
|
10.1016/j.synthmet.2004.09.026
|
The IPCE of 2-carboxyphenylthio derivatives was higher in the following order of heteroaromatic moiety: indole (9a, 4.17) > benzoxazole (9b, 3.16) > quinoline (9d, 0.08), benzothiazole (9c, 0.05).
|
What is IPCE?
|
41352
|
{
"text": [
"8.74%"
],
"answer_start": [
185
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2018.05.074
|
The DSSCs assembled with CuS/WS2 and CuS/MoS2 CE achieved PCEs of 8.21% and 7.12%, respectively, under a simulated solar illumination of 100mWcm−2 (AM 1.5), which are closer to that of 8.74% for the DSSC with Pt CE and higher than those of the DSSCs with pure WS2, MoS2, and CuS CE (6.3%, 6.6%, and 6.4%).Initially, fluorine-doped tin oxide transparent (FTO) glass substrates were cleaned with acetone, ethanol, and deionized water and then baked at 120°C for 5min.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
58117
|
{
"text": [
"7.48%"
],
"answer_start": [
81
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.345
|
The CCoS/MoS2 exhibited Jsc of 16.50mAcm−2, Voc of 0.74V, FF of 0.61, and PCE of 7.48%, which was better than that of CCoS (7.10%) and CMoS2 (4.84%) in , respectively.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
53429
|
{
"text": [
"58.01 ± 0.20%"
],
"answer_start": [
196
]
}
|
10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.062
|
The optimized DSSC fabricated with PGE(0.57) exhibits the highest photo-conversion efficiency of 5.52 ± 0.03% with Voc value of 766.02 ± 0.52 mV, Jsc value of 12.43 ± 0.04 mA cm−2 and FF value of 58.01 ± 0.20%, and also shows good long term stability.
|
What is the value of FF?
|
50858
|
{
"text": [
"Cu2Sn(S1.5Se1.5)"
],
"answer_start": [
134
]
}
|
10.1039/C7TC04952H
|
The authors also studied the optoelectronic properties of the as-synthesized NCs by fabricating a PV device with the structure of ITO/Cu2Sn(S1.5Se1.5)/Al.
|
What is ITO?
|
17784
|
{
"text": [
"704 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
213
]
}
|
10.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.023
|
Under a standard global AM 1.5G solar illumination, the short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), fill factor (FF), and conversion efficiency (η) obtained with D-CF3 are 19.05 mA cm−2, 704 mV, 0.652, and 8.74%, respectively.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
48835
|
{
"text": [
"15.64%"
],
"answer_start": [
61
]
}
|
10.1016/j.cej.2017.08.045
|
As a consequence, the cells based on hier-TiO2 show a PCE of 15.64% for reverse scan and 14.80% for forward scan, while the cells based on Li-hier-TiO2 show a higher PCE of 18.25% and 17.70% for reverse and forward scan, respectively.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
4561
|
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
135
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.095
|
Photovoltaic performances of these typical small-area (0.07cm2) perovskite solar cells without and with PVP are measured under AM 1.5, 100mWcm−2 light illumination.The photocurrent density−voltage (J−V) curves of the solar cells without and with the incorporation of PVP are presented in (b), the corresponding photovoltaic parameters of which are summarized in .
|
What is the value of illumination?
|
3690
|
{
"text": [
"6.80%"
],
"answer_start": [
178
]
}
|
10.1039/C2JM34029A
|
The photoanode made from a single-layer of nanocrystalline TiO2 possesses a short-circuit current density (JSC) of 12.4 mA cm−2 and an overall power-conversion efficiency (η) of 6.80%.
|
What is the value of η?
|
63469
|
{
"text": [
"7.58mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
38
]
}
|
10.1016/j.orgel.2019.06.020
|
PVD-PbI2 SCs showed the lowest JSC of 7.58mA/cm2, VOC of 0.9V, and FF% of 56%, resulting in the lowest η% of 3.84.
|
What is the value of JSC?
|
4120
|
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
287
]
}
|
10.1039/C6TA08426E
|
CHE-1230246 and DMR-1534686.† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental details; digital photos and SEM images of CBTS films and perovskite films on CBTS coated FTO substrates; device testing results of FTO/PEDOTT:PSS/MaPbI3/PCBM/Ag, FTO/MaPbI3/PCBM/Ag, and FTO/TiO2/MaPbI3/Spiro/Ag solar cells; device stability tests.
|
What is FTO?
|
20910
|
{
"text": [
"6.37%"
],
"answer_start": [
48
]
}
|
10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.041
|
The pristine CsPbBr3 solar cell yields a PCE of 6.37% (Voc=1.276V, Jsc=6.66mAcm−2, FF=0.75), which is comparable to the state-of-the-art HTL-free all-inorganic PSCs.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
6723
|
{
"text": [
"MAPbI3−xClx"
],
"answer_start": [
139
]
}
|
10.1016/j.matlet.2019.03.021
|
The diffraction peaks at 2θ=14.01°, 28.19° and 43.09°, corresponds to (110), (220) and (330) diffraction peaks of mixed halide perovskite (MAPbI3−xClx) with tetragonal crystal structure The colour of the film varied with different deposition techniques.
|
What is perovskite?
|
10973
|
{
"text": [
"625 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
139
]
}
|
10.1039/C5RA06774J
|
The results of Nyquist plots are in good agreement with Voc results of the DSSCs based on these dyes: WD13 (653 mV) > WD12 (642 mV) > WD9 (625 mV).In the Bode plots (Fig.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
69777
|
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
115
]
}
|
10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.093
|
This is because Voc is mainly determined by the energy level difference between the Fermi level of the electron in TiO2 anode and redox potential of I−/I3− species.
|
What is anode?
|
55846
|
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
47
]
}
|
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.11.046
|
The incident light intensity was controlled at 100mWcm−2 (calibrated by a standard silicon solar cell).
|
What is the value of light intensity?
|
38399
|
{
"text": [
"6.63%"
],
"answer_start": [
151
]
}
|
10.1039/C3RA00181D
|
When DCM solutions of BTT-I–III were introduced to sensitize the semiconductor electrode, the DSSCs obtained the optimized η value of 5.53%, 6.19% and 6.63%, respectively; while BTT-I–III gives only 4.64%, 5.68% and 6.04% η values when the dye bath is changed to THF.
|
What is the value of η?
|
60918
|
{
"text": [
"17.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
}
|
10.1016/j.orgel.2018.02.026
|
When using DCB for PCBM processing, the PCE of the PSCs was further improved to 17.5%, with simultaneous improvements in Voc, Jsc, and FF.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
8215
|
{
"text": [
"13.58%"
],
"answer_start": [
136
]
}
|
10.1039/C5TA05286F
|
By contrast, employing CuI as the HTL slightly improves device performance, particularly Voc and Jsc, as a consequence, the PCE reached 13.58%, which is slightly higher than that of PEDOT:PSS based devices.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
21929
|
{
"text": [
"0.811V"
],
"answer_start": [
263
]
}
|
10.1016/j.spmi.2019.04.017
|
The results are extremely promising in that they showcase comparable cell efficiencies, with the Sn-based device showing a highest 21.3% efficiency (Jsc of 332.8 A/m2, Voc of 0.839V, FF of 0.764) compared to 23.4% of its Pb counterpart (Jsc of 349.3 A/m2, Voc of 0.811V, FF of 0.828), at similar active layer thicknesses.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
2966
|
{
"text": [
"5.07%"
],
"answer_start": [
153
]
}
|
10.1039/C9NJ01970G
|
In the I3−/I− electrolyte, MY-102 dye shows JSC = 10.44 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.714 V and fill factor (ff) = 0.68% with an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 5.07% as compared to TA-St-CA which shows JSC = 9.44 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.673 V and fill factor (ff) = 0.67% with an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 4.26%.
|
What is the value of η?
|
67333
|
{
"text": [
"0.53 ± 0.07%"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
}
|
10.1039/C0EE00533A
|
As a result, the overall power conversion efficiency (η) was enhanced by more than 300%, 2.24 ± 0.05 versus 0.53 ± 0.07% (Table 1), a rather substantive effect.It is possible to rationalize why hydrothermal synthesis failed to produce TiO2nanotubes when the glass reactor flask was used.
|
What is the value of η?
|
60550
|
{
"text": [
"0.732 V"
],
"answer_start": [
142
]
}
|
10.1016/j.cplett.2017.09.044
|
The DSSC fabricated with TiO2 NRs/NPs exhibits the high short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 17.06 mA/cm2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.732 V, and a fill factor (FF) of 61.7%, yielding a PCE of 7.7%.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
49653
|
{
"text": [
"60%"
],
"answer_start": [
481
]
}
|
10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.086
|
The neat N719 and ETRC absorption spectrum shows broad absorption in the wavelength range of 300–705nm and 300–550nm respectively, wherein the N719 /ETRC mixture exhibits broader and higher absorption intensity.As per AM 1.5G (1 sun, 100mW/cm2), the conventional electrolyte based DSSCs exhibited a PCE of 5.72% (Jsc=11.10mA/cm2, Voc=0.747V and FF=0.69%) and on the other hand, the ETRC-1 and ETRC-2 displayed a higher PCE of 8.02% (Jsc=14.09mA/cm2, Voc=0.780V and FF=0.73%) and 7.60% (Jsc=13.65mA/cm2, Voc=0.770V and FF=0.72%) respectively.
|
What is the value of FF?
|
48893
|
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
263
]
}
|
10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.10.066
|
NHE), indicating that the excited state dyes POZ7 and POZ8 could effectively inject electrons into the CB of TiO2.The photovoltaic performance characteristic of the optimized s-DSCs based on dyes POZ7 and POZ8 with Spiro-OMeTAD as HTM under AM 1.5G illumination, 100mWcm−2 are summarized in .
|
What is the value of illumination?
|
52258
|
{
"text": [
"7.0mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
65
]
}
|
10.1016/j.optmat.2018.03.040
|
DSSC-C exhibits an efficiency of 2.09% with Voc of 0.58V, Jsc of 7.0mAcm−2 and FF of 0.515 and DSSC-D showed an improved performance with and efficiency of 2.31% and a Voc of 0.62V, Jsc of 7.0mAcm−2 and FF of 0.532.
|
What is the value of Jsc?
|
58541
|
{
"text": [
"14.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
223
]
}
|
10.1039/C7TC04649A
|
In addition, the insertion of mixed fullerene functionalized self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) on the WO3 compact layer to passivate the surface defects and reduce ion migration produced a hysteresis-free device with PCE of 14.9%.
|
What is the value of PCE?
|
16831
|
{
"text": [
"784 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
111
]
}
|
10.1039/C4TA05436A
|
Finally, the QSS-DSSC with the POEI-II/MWCNT gel electrolyte has achieved the highest η of 7.65% with a VOC of 784 mV, a JSC of 14.50 mA cm−2, and a FF of 0.67, and at the same time shown an unfailing durability of greater than 1000 h under 50 °C.
|
What is the value of VOC?
|
61682
|
{
"text": [
"1.04 V"
],
"answer_start": [
104
]
}
|
10.1039/C8TA08503J
|
A PCE of 17.21% (JSC ≈ 20.94 mA cm−2; VOC ≈ 1.09 V; FF ≈ 75.40%) and 16.04% (JSC ≈ 20.40 mA cm−2; VOC ≈ 1.04 V; FF ≈ 75.60%) were reported for CzPAF-SBF (6) and CzPAF-SBFN (7), respectively, under AM 1.5 G illumination at an intensity of 100 mW cm−2.
|
What is the value of VOC?
|
14481
|
{
"text": [
"0.674 V"
],
"answer_start": [
71
]
}
|
10.1039/C2CP42993D
|
The performance of the DSSC based on TTC105 (Jsc = 4.20 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.674 V, FF = 66.60%, and η = 1.88%) is not as good as those of TTC102 and TTC104, partly because of the relatively narrow solar light response range and smaller dye loading amount (Table 2).The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) data of these dyes was collected and is presented in Fig.
|
What is the value of Voc?
|
63491
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.