answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"1.57%"
],
"answer_start": [
79
]
} | 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.02.005 | The value of PCE upgrade from 0.10 to 0.56% based on the Z907 and from 0.31 to 1.57% with the dye C101, about more than five times increase. | What is the value of PCE? | 55727 |
{
"text": [
"0.39 Ω"
],
"answer_start": [
114
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.004 | Thus, the FF will be increased , it can be seen that the Rct values of these CEs are in the order: Pt-sputtering (0.39 Ω) < NiCo2S4 (4.42 Ω) < Pt-pyrolysis (8.05 Ω). | What is the value of Rct? | 52206 |
{
"text": [
"20.09%"
],
"answer_start": [
201
]
} | 10.1039/C8NR00152A | We found that the optimal perovskite, i.e., MA0.1FA0.75Cs0.15PbI3 annealed at 110 °C achieves a high short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 23.15 mA cm−2, fill factor (FF) of 76.81% and PCE as high as 20.09%, which surpass the reported highest efficiency (18.9%) recorded for ZnO ETL based PSCs. | What is the value of PCE? | 20429 |
{
"text": [
"16.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
198
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA01898F | The device with ZnO and the slow-grown perovskite showed the highest JSC of 22.0 mA cm−2 and VOC of 1.027 V, while the FF is similar to that of the fast-grown device, and finally the highest PCE of 16.8% was obtained. | What is the value of PCE? | 22266 |
{
"text": [
"19.74 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
137
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.10.025 | There is a reduction in carrier collection by the C60 layer due to the decrease in the C60 layer coverage, which results in a lower JSC (19.74 mA/cm2). | What is the value of JSC? | 11489 |
{
"text": [
"∼3"
],
"answer_start": [
36
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.12.034 | The thickness of the CuSCN film was ∼3 μm from the top of the TiO2 surface. | What is TiO2? | 53826 |
{
"text": [
"Cs0.05FA0.81MA0.14PbI2.55Br0.45"
],
"answer_start": [
117
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA02960A | Then CsI, predissolved as a 1.5 M stock solution in DMSO, was added to the mixed perovskite precursor to achieve the Cs0.05FA0.81MA0.14PbI2.55Br0.45 precursor solution. | What is perovskite? | 15621 |
{
"text": [
"927.6 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.153 | The device with dopant-free Me-BPZTPA exhibits a Jsc of 16.26 mA cm−2, a Voc of 927.6 mV and a poor FF of 0.540, yielding a PCE of 8.16%. | What is the value of Voc? | 11429 |
{
"text": [
"3.71 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
67
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.01.009 | However, the η value of WD1 is only 1.48% when CDCA is added (Jsc= 3.71 mA/cm2, Voc= 0.59 V, FF = 0.67). | What is the value of Jsc? | 46864 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
250
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.086 | This suggests that Li2SiO3 modification can reduce the electron trap density, resulting in the promoted electron transport [To measure the electron mobility of TiO2 and LS-TiO2 ETLs, we have fabricated the electron-only devices with the structure of FTO/TiO2 or LS-TiO2/PCBM/Ag. | What is ? | 8309 |
{
"text": [
"16.99%"
],
"answer_start": [
59
]
} | 10.1039/C9DT00930B | And in reverse scanning, the control device shows a PCE of 16.99%, with Jsc = 21.79 mA cm−2, Voc = 1.06 V and FF = 73.34%. | What is the value of PCE? | 18693 |
{
"text": [
"21.1"
],
"answer_start": [
141
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | The device based on the FTO/bl-TiO2/MAPbI3/spiro-OMeTAD/Ag structure yielded the maximum PCE of 16.2% under standard AM 1.5 condition (Jsc = 21.1 mA cm−2, Voc = 1.04 V, and FF = 0.74).In 2013, Kelly and coworkers reported the use of a thin ZnO nanoparticle film (∼25 nm) as an electron-transport layer in an ITO/bl-ZnO/MAPbI3/spiro-OMeTAD/Ag structure PHJ solar cell. | What is ? | 13296 |
{
"text": [
"74.52%"
],
"answer_start": [
167
]
} | 10.1039/C7TC02954C | The best performance of the devices was obtained when 0.3 mg mL−1 PVP was added, and the resulting PCE was 16.57% with VOC of 1057 mV, JSC of 21.38 mA cm−2, and FF of 74.52%. | What is the value of FF? | 13869 |
{
"text": [
"20.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.11.123 | shows that the low FF value of the graphite electrode (20.9%) is improved by depositing Pt nanoparticles (64.2%). | What is the value of FF? | 34580 |
{
"text": [
"0.74"
],
"answer_start": [
59
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | Interestingly, an increase in the fill factor from 0.66 to 0.74 was also measured, indicating the better charge transport properties in Br-doped cells. | What is ? | 13389 |
{
"text": [
"(FAPbI3)0.85(MAPbBr3)0.15"
],
"answer_start": [
201
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA01718A | In particular, KR321 shows a similar quenching to that observed for spiro-OMeTAD.To demonstrate the function of the novel compounds as dopant-free HTMs, we prepared PSCs with mixed perovskite absorber (FAPbI3)0.85(MAPbBr3)0.15 (MA: CH3NH3+, FA: NHCHNH3+). | What is perovskite? | 13587 |
{
"text": [
"8.78%"
],
"answer_start": [
154
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA14345G | Notably, DSCs using the NF-based, semitransparent CE achieved high PCEs of up to 8.58%, superior to those based on NFBs or HSs, and comparable to that of 8.78% using Pt as the CE. | What is the value of PCE? | 64449 |
{
"text": [
"4.55%"
],
"answer_start": [
134
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.12.066 | The energy conversion efficiency (η) of DSSCs with raw, purified and purified and ground GNs counter electrodes were 2.71%, 3.18% and 4.55%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 49467 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.201 | Additionally, the decrease of Rct2 means the charge transfer process at the interface of TiO2/dye/electrolyte is improved indicating the increasing of I3− reduction. | What is ? | 27692 |
{
"text": [
"0.72 V"
],
"answer_start": [
12
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA01339A | 4.9% (Voc = 0.72 V and Jsc = 11.7 mA cm−2) with the water treatment for 24 h. | What is the value of Voc? | 63751 |
{
"text": [
"0.33cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
141
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.029 | The procedure for the preparation of the scattering layer paste had been described in our previous publication The active area of a DSSC was 0.33cm2 covered by a mask with a light-illuminated area of 0.16cm2 to reduce the scattered light and illuminated by a class-A quality solar simulator (XES-301S, AM1.5G, San-Ei Electric Co., Ltd.). | What is the value of active area? | 28488 |
{
"text": [
"glass"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2005.05.021 | In all experiments, the sample was illuminated through the conducting glass substrate with an illuminated area of 0.188 cm−2 and no corrections were made for the reflection and transmission loses in the CTO. | What is substrate? | 47775 |
{
"text": [
"7.00%"
],
"answer_start": [
185
]
} | 10.1039/C2NR11617K | DSSCs based on a 20 μm TiO2nanoparticle film solely and a bilayer of 13 μm TiO2nanoparticles and 7 μm TiO2nanotubes exhibited the highest power conversion efficiency, PCE, of 8.02% and 7.00%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 66356 |
{
"text": [
"Ag"
],
"answer_start": [
45
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP00502K | The Nyquist plot of the ITO/ZnO/MAPbI3/P3TAA/Ag cell shows two semicircles and the recombination resistance is calculated to be 96.8 Ω. | What is ITO? | 18669 |
{
"text": [
"13.4mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
28
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.11.025 | It is found that the JSC of 13.4mA/cm2 in the case of the sputtering method is obviously much lower than that (18.2mA/cm2) in the case of the sol-gel method, thus leading to the lower η of 6.6% in the case of the sputtering method.To understand the cause of the lower JSC in the case of the sputtering method, topographic images and micro-scale current path distributions of ZnO-coated FTO substrates were therefore examined using C-AFM. | What is the value of JSC? | 8089 |
{
"text": [
"12.93%"
],
"answer_start": [
136
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.010 | By optimizing the doping concentration of F4-TCNQ, the PSC based on 1.5mol% F4-TCNQ doped Spiro-OMeTAD exhibits the best PCE as high as 12.93%, which is comparable to that of 14.32% for reference device with Li-TFSI and tBP doped Spiro-OMeTAD. | What is the value of PCE? | 1087 |
{
"text": [
"70 %"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
} | 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163888 | Therefore, we obtain very high values of Voc of 1350 mV and a FF of 70 %. | What is the value of FF? | 33495 |
{
"text": [
"207 μW"
],
"answer_start": [
118
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2005.05.009 | The Pmax of DSC sensitized with the black rice extract (327 μW) is superior to those with erythrina variegata flower (207 μW), rosa xanthina (163 μW), kelp (118 μW) and capsicum (58 μW). | What is the value of Pmax? | 50760 |
{
"text": [
"4.11%"
],
"answer_start": [
261
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.080 | Thus, the DSSC containing BMISO3CF3 has smaller Rdiff and longer electron lifetime, which resulted in the best cell performance, in which the short-circuit current (JSC), open-circuit voltage (VOC), conversion efficiency (η) and FF were 10.18 mA cm−2, 0.657 V, 4.11% and 0.615, respectively, as listed in The DSSCs are also measured by EIS in the dark to elucidate correlation of the electron transport at TiO2/electrolyte interface with anions of ionic liquids are shown in . | What is the value of η? | 30400 |
{
"text": [
"6.72%"
],
"answer_start": [
122
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.120 | The experimental results demonstrated that In2.77S4-RGO hybrids CE exhibited a high powder conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.72%, which outperforms that of RGO CE (5.09%) and In2.77S4 CE (1.97%) and is higher than that of Pt CE (6.30%). | What is the value of PCE? | 51938 |
{
"text": [
"1.01 V"
],
"answer_start": [
204
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.024 | When the Au@Ag(20 nm) nanocuboids were deposited on the top of the mesoporous TiO2 layer (configuration #2, ) and act as scattering material, the device demonstrates Jsc, Voc, FF and PCE of 21.78 mA/cm2, 1.01 V, 0.735% and 16.17%, respectively, corresponding to an enhancement of 6.7% in PCE. | What is the value of Voc? | 12049 |
{
"text": [
"711 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
40
]
} | 10.1039/C8SC04969F | Thus, the Voc was greatly improved from 711 mV (XW10) to 730 mV (XW40). | What is the value of Voc? | 71656 |
{
"text": [
"9.68mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.12.006 | Thus, the solar cell device based on the sensitizer 4b yielded a higher overall conversion efficiency up to 5.26% (JSC=9.68mAcm−2, VOC=740mV, and FF=73.48%) under 100mWcm−2 simulated AM 1.5 G solar irradiation. | What is the value of JSC? | 33101 |
{
"text": [
"0.945 V"
],
"answer_start": [
182
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.09.091 | The efficiency is reproducible with efficiency distribution shown in Figure SThe PSC without doping exhibits short circuit current density Jsc = 22mAcm−2, open circuit voltage Voc = 0.945 V, fill factor FF = 0.64 and efficiency = 13.3%. | What is the value of Voc? | 1305 |
{
"text": [
"3.24%"
],
"answer_start": [
175
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.009 | (a) shows the steady-state photocurrent of 3.45mA/cm2 measured at a bias voltage (0.94V) near the maximum power point to demonstrate the stabilized power output with a PCE of 3.24%, confirming the air-stable nature of CsPbBr3 PSCs (b) gives the cross-sectional SEM inserted with high-magnification image of our CsPbBr3 cells. | What is the value of PCE? | 4831 |
{
"text": [
"8.04%"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.082 | These factors improve the power conversion efficiency (η) up to 8.04%, which is better than that of the reference Pt based DSSC (6.79%). | What is the value of η? | 51354 |
{
"text": [
"2.47%"
],
"answer_start": [
170
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA04782F | Under AM 1.5G irradiation (100 mW cm−2), a maximum power conversion efficiency (η) of 4.09% is obtained for the WD11-based DSSC, higher than that of DTF-free dye L0 (η = 2.47%). | What is the value of η? | 68129 |
{
"text": [
"71.59%"
],
"answer_start": [
109
]
} | 10.1039/C9TA01151J | The control HTM-free PSC had poor photovoltaic performance with a Jsc of 6.15 mA cm−2, Voc of 1.390 V, FF of 71.59%, and PCE of 6.12%. | What is the value of FF? | 15581 |
{
"text": [
"73%"
],
"answer_start": [
125
]
} | 10.1039/C7CC04606E | JY7, under the same conditions, shows a much lower efficiency of 15.71%, with Jsc = 20.58 mA cm−2, Voc = 1047 mV and a FF of 73%. | What is the value of FF? | 15172 |
{
"text": [
"Au"
],
"answer_start": [
50
]
} | 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.09.175 | The FTO/b-TiO2/mp-TiO2/CH3NH3[La0.07Pb0.93]I3/NiO/Au device exhibited the highest short-circuit current density (Jsc = 19.53 mA.cm−2) and largest open-circuit voltage (Voc = 0.9 V). | What is FTO? | 11397 |
{
"text": [
"67.64%"
],
"answer_start": [
175
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.09.014 | The device based on the pristine MAPbI3 perovskite layer shows an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 1.044 V, a short-circuit current (JSC) of 22.59 mA⋅cm−2, a fill factor (FF) of 67.64% and a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 15.95%. | What is the value of FF? | 3533 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
160
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.05.007 | Ultrasonic soldering was used to increase the conductivity of the contact points of the electrodes.J-V characteristics were measured with a Keithley 2400 under 100mW/cm2 illumination from a solar simulator (450W, Oriel). | What is the value of illumination? | 44937 |
{
"text": [
"4.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
104
]
} | 10.1039/C7EE01526G | In a similar experiment, combining 4- and 5-subcell SSM-DSC systems led to a Voc of 8.55 V and a PCE of 4.1% (Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 69632 |
{
"text": [
"4.56%"
],
"answer_start": [
128
]
} | 10.1016/j.mssp.2014.05.016 | As we can see, the DSSC fabricated on GZO glass grown at 350 °C exhibits higher VOC (0.78 V), JSC (8.8 mA/cm2), FF (39%) and η (4.56%) than that fabricated on GZO glass grown at 300 °C. | What is the value of η? | 41490 |
{
"text": [
"817 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
161
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.166 | The dye QX23 with a furan π-bridge and a cyanoacrylic acid acceptor/anchoring group have achieved a highest PCE of 7.09% with a Jsc of 12.9 mA cm−2 and a Voc of 817 mV, demonstrating it is a promising strategy to construct efficient (D)2–A–π–A type sensitizers by incorporating indoloquinoxaline and triphenylamine.Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at | What is the value of Voc? | 40830 |
{
"text": [
"0.16 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
384
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.12.017 | Hence, the weight ratios of the above mixtures such as 5:0, 4:1, 3:2, 2:3, and 1:4 were denoted as TB-/a-TiO2 (5:0), TB-/a-TiO2 (4:1), TB-/a-TiO2 (3:2), TB-/a-TiO2 (2:3), and TB-/a-TiO2 (1:4), respectively.To assemble the DSSC, the a-TiO2 paste were screen printed on cleaned fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) conducting substrates to obtain a thickness of ∼14 μm with an active area of 0.16 cm2 followed by the annealing procedure. | What is the value of active area? | 26604 |
{
"text": [
"13.75%"
],
"answer_start": [
27
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.06.009 | At last, an average PCE of 13.75% is obtained for NRs+S. | What is the value of PCE? | 7456 |
{
"text": [
"16.16%"
],
"answer_start": [
127
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227216 | For the simplest and unoptimised ITO/PEDOT:PSS/CH3NH3PbI3-tBP/PC61BM/Ag PSC, the PCE and the fill factor (FF) were enhanced to 16.16% and 0.79 on a glass substrate and to 13.54% and 0.7 on a flexible PET substrate, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 3699 |
{
"text": [
"3.5 %"
],
"answer_start": [
416
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.086 | The poor performance of the DSSCs with the SnO2 photoanode can be explained by: i) a 300 mV positive shift of the conduction band position, compared to that of TiO2, causing faster interfacial electron recombination, and ii) less dye adsorption with the acidic carboxyl group as a result of the lower isoelectric point In our study, the SnO2-6L CaCO3 photoanode demonstrated a 3.5-fold improvement of efficiency (η= 3.5 %) over the pristine SnO2 photoanode, with a Voc of 0.50 V, a Jsc of 12.33 mA cm−2, and a ff of 56%. | What is the value of η? | 48540 |
{
"text": [
"19.9mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
62
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.12.010 | The HFB-OMeDPA-based devices yielded a VOC of 1.09V, a JSC of 19.9mAcm−2, a FF of 71.4%, leading to an average PCE of 15.4%. | What is the value of JSC? | 9816 |
{
"text": [
"0.57 V"
],
"answer_start": [
196
]
} | 10.1016/j.saa.2018.03.016 | Additionally, this compact film can also prevent electron recombination at the FTO/electrolyte interface.By using this approach for RuAnth-DSCs, the photocurrent is increased by 50% with a VOC of 0.57 V, , which leads to an overall efficiency enhancement of 71%. | What is the value of VOC? | 38696 |
{
"text": [
"0.88 V"
],
"answer_start": [
147
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA07957H | From these obtained parameters it is seen that the optimized device is the one with 15 nm a:CuAlO2 which exhibits a Jsc of 21.98 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.88 V, an FF of 0.75 and a PCE of 14.52%. | What is the value of Voc? | 18329 |
{
"text": [
"8.41%"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.078 | For the pure C-based devices, an average power conversion efficiency (PCE) was attained at 8.41%, with an open circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.8947V, a short-circuit photocurrent density (JSC) of 16.25mAcm−2 and a fill factor (FF) of 61.75%. | What is the value of PCE? | 9249 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
429
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.035 | The electrolyte, 0.03M I2, 0.6M 1-methyl-3-propylimidazolium iodide (PMII), 0.10M guanidinium thiocyanate, and 0.5M tert-butylpyridine in acetonitrile and valeronitrile (volume ratio 85:15), was introduced from a hole made on the counter electrode into the space between the sandwiched cells.The photocurrent–voltage characteristics of DSSCs were recorded using a Keithley model 2400 digital source meter under one sun AM 1.5 G (100mWcm−2) illumination with a solar light simulator (Oriel, Model: 94041A). | What is the value of illumination? | 48356 |
{
"text": [
"21.35mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
146
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.026 | When 4,4′-BiPy (0.05mgmL−1) is separately prepared as the passivation layer atop the perovskite film, the best PCE of 16.67% is achieved with JSC=21.35mAcm−2, VOC=1.05V and FF=74.37%. | What is the value of JSC? | 11806 |
{
"text": [
"ZnO"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1039/C000584C | The unique characteristics of this nanocomposite photoanode design that have rendered it applicable to flexible DSSCs can be summarized here: (1) the ZnO shell on SnO2, conducive to good contacts between nanoparticles and Voc enhancement, is easily activated under the mild conditions of NH3 treatment; (2) the ZnO nanotetrapods with a symmetrically branching 1D structure not only ensure facile network formation on flexible substrates with good mechanical durability, further enhanced by mechanical press, but also have a positive bearing on electron transport resulting in an improved charge collection efficiency when compared with big ZnO particles. | What is photoanode? | 66272 |
{
"text": [
"9.80mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
151
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.059 | After a thin layer of TiO2 was coated on the SnO2 NF network by using the liquid atomic layer deposition method, the Voc and Jsc increased slightly to 9.80mAcm−2 and 0.588V, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 35484 |
{
"text": [
"1.01V"
],
"answer_start": [
69
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.07.009 | A best PCE of 13.6% was obtained with an open-circuit voltage VOC of 1.01V, a short-circuit current density Jsc of 19.8mAcm−2 and a fill factor(FF) of 68.1%.Beyond that, we also studied the photovoltaic performances of perovskite solar cells fabricated using DMSO solvent and annealing under N2 atmosphere. | What is the value of VOC? | 1786 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
243
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.182 | Current density-voltage (J-V) characteristics and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were obtained on CHI660B electrochemical workstation (CHI660B, Shanghai Huachen Co.) under AM 1.5G illumination with an incident light intensity of 100mW/cm2 (SDSB-09022, Newport Corporation). | What is the value of illumination? | 565 |
{
"text": [
"19.41%"
],
"answer_start": [
283
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA04851C | Thus, through both the surface passivation of the perovskite layer and the doping of the electron transport layer with 2,6-Py, the resultant MAPbI3-based planar solar cells outperform the untreated devices with power conversion efficiency (PCE) significantly improved from 15.53% to 19.41%. | What is the value of PCE? | 12187 |
{
"text": [
"5.73%"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.112 | When 15% content of carbon black was induced into LTCEs, Voc, Jsc and PCE of the device were increased to 0.87 V, 16.20 mA cm−2 and 5.73% respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 6260 |
{
"text": [
"1.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
148
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.11.035 | In spite of the excellent catalytic activity of the MWNT forests, the DSSC with the as-syn CE exhibited poor cell performances (Jsc=8.2mA/cm2 and η=1.6%), most probably owing to the low charge collection efficiency of the CE. | What is the value of η? | 28507 |
{
"text": [
"0.66 V"
],
"answer_start": [
107
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.100 | The PCE of DSSCs has been dramatically improved by 11.2%, comparing with that of the DSSC with Pt CE (Voc= 0.66 V, Jsc= 13.30 mA cm-2, FF = 0.63, PCE = 5.53%)., the Voc values of DSSCs with CoxNi1-xSe and Pt CEs are all close to 0.66 V. | What is the value of Voc? | 38655 |
{
"text": [
"7.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA07785K | The cell based on TBT-1 exhibits the highest conversion efficiency (η) of 7.6% (JSC = 19.56 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.64 V, and FF = 0.61) (Table 2). | What is the value of η? | 70272 |
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
14
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.184 | Moreover, the CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite films grown on Ag:NiOx exhibit better crystallinity, higher coverage and smoother surface with densely packed larger grains than those grown on the pristine NiOx film. | What is perovskite? | 7482 |
{
"text": [
"689mV"
],
"answer_start": [
53
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.12.156 | The NC-MC-2 DSSCs show the Jsc of 15.0mAcm−2, Voc of 689mV, and FF of 69.0%, leading to the η of 7.16%. | What is the value of Voc? | 35838 |
{
"text": [
"353 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
111
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2013.07.028 | Among these dyes, J3 gives the best photoelectric conversion efficiency of 1.52%, with Jsc= 7.53 mA cm–2, Voc= 353 mV, FF= 0.57. | What is the value of Voc? | 40565 |
{
"text": [
"738 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
54
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA28473F | Although the Voc is slightly increased from 725 mV to 738 mV by adjusting the loading time of LP-2, the Jsc is reduced to 12.57 mA cm−2, and ultimately, the even lower efficiency is obtained. | What is the value of Voc? | 67629 |
{
"text": [
"59.89%"
],
"answer_start": [
296
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.051 | The PCE improved to 2.25% for this structure's champion device, with a value of Voc of 0.63 V, a value of Jsc of 5.89 mA/cm2, and a fill factor (FF) of 60.63; in contrast, the reference device prepared without AS treatment exhibited a value of Voc of 0.62 V, a value of Jsc of 5.09 mA/cm2, an FF 59.89%, and a PCE of 1.89%. | What is the value of FF? | 5446 |
{
"text": [
"6.185%"
],
"answer_start": [
128
]
} | 10.1016/j.cap.2013.04.012 | A sol reaction time of 45min and heat treatment temperature of 550°C has been observed to result in optimal cell performance (η=6.185%, Jsc=13.233mA/cm2, Voc=0.672V, ff=0.694). | What is the value of η? | 46263 |
{
"text": [
"8.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
17
]
} | 10.1039/C5CP00073D | PCEs of 7.6% and 8.4% were achieved for the devices formed from Pb(SCN)2 and Pb(NO3)2, respectively.Organic–inorganic hybrid perovskites have gained significant attention over the last few years due to their promising photovoltaic performance. | What is the value of PCE? | 22828 |
{
"text": [
"13.36%"
],
"answer_start": [
95
]
} | 10.1039/C7CC09838C | Using the as-synthesized CdS as the electron transport layer in inverted planar PSCs, a PCE of 13.36% is achieved. | What is the value of PCE? | 19794 |
{
"text": [
"0.46 V"
],
"answer_start": [
56
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2005.09.004 | The Isc and Voc of 6b were observed at 1.78 mA cm−2 and 0.46 V, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 36770 |
{
"text": [
"3.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
129
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC03542C | After covering this assembly with a Pt-coated FTO counter-electrode, a VOC of 630 mV, JSC of 10.0 mA cm−2, FF of 0.56 and PCE of 3.5% were achieved in the complete device.Zhang et al. | What is the value of PCE? | 70981 |
{
"text": [
"6.5mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
} | 10.1016/j.renene.2012.11.017 | And this, as a consequence, increased Jsc of the cell by about 20% (from 5.4 to 6.5mA/cm2) (). | What is the value of Jsc? | 30059 |
{
"text": [
"14.43 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2009.10.018 | The short-circuit current density (Jsc) of each layer is 7.18 mA/cm2, 13.60 mA/cm2 and 14.43 mA/cm2, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 24459 |
{
"text": [
"0.635 V"
],
"answer_start": [
353
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.09.049 | 0.5% GO-incorporated TiO2 NFs based working electrode shows the highest conversion efficiency (η=4.52%) with a significantly higher open circuit voltage (Voc=0.784 V), short-circuit current density (Jsc=9.41 mA/cm2) and fill factor (FF=0.61) as compared to the pristine TiO2 NFs which shows conversion efficiency of 1.54%, open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.635 V, short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 6.75 mA/cm2 and fill factor (FF) of 0.35. | What is the value of Voc? | 24517 |
{
"text": [
"4.28%"
],
"answer_start": [
35
]
} | 10.1039/C1CP21762C | The η could further be improved to 4.28% with the modification of the double layer structure of ZnO with TiOx (precisely using 60 μL of TTIP, EDX spectra, Fig. | What is the value of η? | 62213 |
{
"text": [
"0.09%"
],
"answer_start": [
373
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA13002A | 1 and Table 1, one can see that the short-circuit current density (JSC), open-circuit voltage (VOC), fill factor (FF), and power conversion efficiency (η) of a DSSC with a PEDOT counter electrode were 10.7 mA cm−2, 0.73 V, 0.443, and 3.46%, respectively, whereas a DSSC with a ZrN (crystal nanoparticles of 37 nm) counter electrode exhibited a negligible power conversion (0.09%). | What is the value of η? | 66381 |
{
"text": [
"4.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.10.006 | The device (glass/FTO/compact-TiO2/CsPbIBr2/Au) showed a PCE of 4.7%, a Jsc of 8.7mA/cm2, a Voc of 959mV, and a FF of 0.56 under reverse scan, while PCE=3.7%, Jsc=8.7mA/cm2, Voc=818mV and FF=0.52 under forward scan, as shown in (c)). | What is the value of PCE? | 1438 |
{
"text": [
"73.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
151
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.10.115 | It is evident that τe of Cell-1 is longer than that of Cell -2 and Cell-3.The fill factors (FFs) are measured to be 72.2% (Cell-1), 73.3% (Cell-2) and 73.4% (Cell-3), respectively. | What is the value of FF? | 30219 |
{
"text": [
"<100"
],
"answer_start": [
414
]
} | 10.1039/C1JM10675A | It is therefore concluded that a considerable efficiency enhancement in the DSSC fabricated with a TiO2-PHEMA/TTIP photoelectrode is due to the synergistic effect of large dye absorption amount, greater light scattering, enhanced electron transfer and better penetration of polymer electrolytes.The combined process of graft/crosslink polymerization and sol–gel reaction has been introduced into TiO2nanoparticles <100nm in size with an anatase/rutile mixed phase, as confirmed by FT-IR spectroscopy, SEM and XRD analysis. | What is TiO2? | 63723 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
145
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.026 | The dye-loaded anode and a Pt counter-electrode were sealed together with a sealing material, SX1170 (Solaronix), around the TiO2 active area of 0.25 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 44711 |
{
"text": [
"I3−/I−"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.107754 | The GSOP values ranging from −5.50 to −5.56eV confirmed that the HOMO level of all these dyes is more negative than that of I3−/I− redox couple (−5.2eV) [] and there is enough thermodynamic driving force for efficient dye regeneration, and thus the GSOP of SD-22 is more destabilized than the rest of the series. | What is redox couple? | 30629 |
{
"text": [
"280 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
128
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA26310G | Under the same conditions, the reference P1-based devices rendered an efficiency of 0.099% with a JSC of 1.18 mA cm−2, a VOC of 280 mV and an ff of 0.30.Even though the E1-based devices render better performance as compared to the P1-based ones, the Incident Photon-to-Current Conversion Efficiency (IPCE) from E1-based devices are much lower than that from devices based on P1. | What is the value of VOC? | 68230 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
126
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA05078B | It was demonstrated that the graphene in the anode can directly transfer photogenerated electrons from the conduction band of TiO2 to the FTO layer, where the PAA–PEG/graphene gel electrolyte has an ability of shortening the charge diffusion path length and expanding the electrocatalytic reaction from the electrolyte/CE interface to the conducting gel electrolyte. | What is ? | 74623 |
{
"text": [
"11.82%"
],
"answer_start": [
54
]
} | 10.1016/j.cplett.2016.12.036 | The final PCE values of PSCs were promoted to 11.33%, 11.82%, and 13.41% by doping TBAB, TBAPF6, and TBABF4 into PCBM as ETL, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 10453 |
{
"text": [
"681 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
65
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.09.019 | Under the same conditions, MX11 gave JSC of 10.6 mA cm−2, VOC of 681 mV, and ff of 0.67, corresponding η of 4.84%.As shown in above, the substituent effect of alkoxy groups on photovoltaic performance of DSSCs are obvious. | What is the value of VOC? | 40983 |
{
"text": [
"18.25%"
],
"answer_start": [
84
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2017.08.045 | The optimized spin-speed is 2000 rpm for both types of scaffolds and got 15.64% and 18.25% PCEs of PSCs for hier-TiO2 and Li-hier-TiO2, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 4573 |
{
"text": [
"Pt"
],
"answer_start": [
58
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.004 | The light-to-electric energy conversion efficiency of the Pt-free DSSC with treated NiS-c CE reaches 7.37% under full sunlight illumination (100 mW cm−2, AM1.5 G), increasing by 52.30% than that using as-deposited NiS CE without H2S treatment (4.84%). | What is CE? | 44582 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
156
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.063 | The dye-adsorbed TiO2 nanotube photoanodes and semitransparent Pt counter electrodes were sandwiched with a liquid electrolyte containing the redox couple (I−/I3−) introduced between them. | What is redox couple? | 55407 |
{
"text": [
"12.70%"
],
"answer_start": [
84
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.146 | After 100s of MPP tracking measurements, the steady state PCEs are calculated to be 12.70%, 15.47% and 17.83% for the TiO2, SnO2 and TiO2-SnO2 based devices, respectively, which are also depicted by the points in the corresponding J-V curves in To evaluate the reproducibility of the solar cells, we fabricated 16 devices for each type of ETL and their photovoltaic performances were investigated. | What is the value of PCE? | 1719 |
{
"text": [
"0.81 V"
],
"answer_start": [
174
]
} | 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.08.051 | Between the devices using nil nanoparticles and using both types of nanoparticles, the values of Jsc, Voc, ff, and PCE increased from 16.75 mA/cm2 to 17.88 mA/cm2, 0.78 V to 0.81 V, 0.68 to 0.70, and 8.82% to 10.17%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 27018 |
{
"text": [
"9.08%"
],
"answer_start": [
79
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.028 | In contrast, brush-painted PeSCs using 2-M solvent exhibited comparable PCE of 9.08% to reference spin-coated devices showing PCE of 9.24%. | What is the value of PCE? | 8470 |
{
"text": [
"5.88 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2014.03.024 | It is observed that the value of current density shows linearity with concentration up to 0.1 M (Jsc= 5.88 mA/cm2, η= 1.37%) and then decreases drastically with increase in concentration. | What is the value of Jsc? | 29166 |
{
"text": [
"12.96%"
],
"answer_start": [
189
]
} | 10.1039/C8RA03119C | Devices fabricated with ELA treated GZO ETL acheived a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 13.68%, higher than that of the PSCs utilizing GZO with conventional high-temperature annealing (12.96%). | What is the value of PCE? | 19293 |
{
"text": [
"17.98%"
],
"answer_start": [
135
]
} | 10.1039/C8ME00036K | The optimized device shows a maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 19.87% and a 79% fill factor (FF), which are higher than the 17.98% PCE and 72% FF of the reference device. | What is the value of PCE? | 12698 |
{
"text": [
"5.15"
],
"answer_start": [
19
]
} | 10.1039/C8CS00029H | The highest PCE of 5.15% at Voc = 478 mV and a FF of 45% (Fig. | What is CE? | 65819 |
{
"text": [
"PtCuNi"
],
"answer_start": [
443
]
} | 10.1039/C6CS00752J | Aiming at reducing the cost of CEs and enhancing the performance of the DSSC devices, many alloy CEs have been researched, including Pt alloy CEs: Pt0.02Co, PtCo2, PtCo, PtCo0.50, PtNi0.50, PtNi0.75, Pt3Ni, PtNi, PtFe, Pt0.96Ni0.04, PtMo, PtMn0.05, PtCr0.05, PtPd1.25, PtRu3, PtRu, PtAu; free-Pt alloy CEs: CoNi0.25, CoNi, FeCo2, FeSe, FeNi, Co0.85Se, CoSe, Ni0.85Se, NiSe, MoSe, Cu0.50Se, Ru0.33Se, RuSe, Pd7Se4, NiPd; and ternary alloy CEs: PtCuNi, PtCoNi, PtPdNi, PtFeNi, etc. | What is CE? | 66565 |
{
"text": [
"7.88%"
],
"answer_start": [
54
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2018.10.022 | As compared to Pt-based DSSC, which produced a PCE of 7.88% (open-circuit voltage (Voc)=733mV, short-circuit current density (Jsc)=14.93mA/cm2, fill factor (FF)=0.72), the NiS NFAs-based DSSC yielded a significantly enhanced PCE of 9.49%, possessing a Voc value of 735mV, a Jsc value of 17.23mA/cm2, and a FF value of 0.75. | What is the value of PCE? | 26279 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.