answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"6.53%"
],
"answer_start": [
249
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.086 | Of them, the FeTa2O6/SC, CoTa2O6/SC, and CuTa10O26/SC CEs catalysts exhibited excellent electrocatalytic activities and electrocatalytic stability for I3− reduction, thus resulted in comparable power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.85%, 6.79%, and 6.53% to Pt-based CE (6.34%) in DSSCs. | What is the value of PCE? | 43714 |
{
"text": [
"15.11 ± 0.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
140
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC02923G | The average PCE follows a similar trend as the maximum PCE, with the reference perovskite device giving an average conversion efficiency of 15.11 ± 0.8%, and the CsI-based samples with 16.21 ± 0.7% for 1%, 17.46 ± 0.6% for 3%, 14.28 ± 0.7% for 5% and 10.98 ± 0.5% for 10% (see Table 1). | What is the value of PCE? | 21917 |
{
"text": [
"0.89 V"
],
"answer_start": [
57
]
} | 10.1039/C2NR30586K | The ECN device achieved a Jsc of 12.98 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.89 V, and a FF of 0.54, leading to a η of ∼6.31%. | What is the value of Voc? | 61312 |
{
"text": [
"Cs2NaBiI6"
],
"answer_start": [
388
]
} | 10.1039/C8SE00154E | Hence, the design of a low band gap double perovskite halide is greatly needed; the new double perovskite should have an appropriate band gap with wide absorption range across the solar spectrum, and it should maintain the advantages of double perovskites such as stability and non-toxicity.We herein present our study on the successful synthesis of highly crystalline, stable, and novel Cs2NaBiI6 (CNBI) lead-free double perovskite via a facile one-step hydrothermal process. | What is perovskite? | 15470 |
{
"text": [
"8.21%"
],
"answer_start": [
81
]
} | 10.1039/C4TC02657H | The corresponding fabricated DSSCs showed the highest η of 9.32%, increased from 8.21% without laser ablation, indicating a 13.5% of improvement in η due to laser patterning of the TiO2 photoelectrode alone. | What is the value of η? | 60516 |
{
"text": [
"0.13%"
],
"answer_start": [
184
]
} | 10.1039/C0JM02532A | 80 nm, which has the optimum performance due to the balance in optical absorption and serial resistance of the blended film.Among bis-terpyridyl ligandsM1–M3, the highest PCE value of 0.13% was obtained from the device containing an active layer of M1:PCBM (1:1 w/w) with Voc = 0.43 V, Jsc = 0.97 mA cm−2, and FF = 31.8%. | What is the value of PCE? | 76041 |
{
"text": [
"13.81 mA·cm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.11.006 | In comparison, PCE, Jsc, Voc and FF of DSSC with Pt CE are 7.08%, 13.81 mA·cm−2, 0.76 V, and 67.45%, in the order given. | What is the value of Jsc? | 44035 |
{
"text": [
"12.63mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
110
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.06.068 | Larger auxiliary donor of ZHG6 can lead to higher open circuit voltage but lower shorter circuit current (Jsc=12.63mAcm−2) compared with that of ZHG5. | What is the value of Jsc? | 59743 |
{
"text": [
"5.25%"
],
"answer_start": [
24
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA05117D | For reference, a PCE of 5.25% (Jsc = 13.60 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.58 V, FF = 0.67) was obtained under the same condition for the DSSC with the conventional Pt CE. | What is the value of PCE? | 67231 |
{
"text": [
"12.46%"
],
"answer_start": [
175
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.009 | The dopant-free CzPAF-TPA based device exhibited the appreciable PCE of 12.37% with Jsc of 19.18 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.89 V, and FF of 72.73% under the forward scan condition and 12.46% with Jsc of 18.97 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.90 V, and FF of 72.83% under the reverse scan condition. | What is the value of PCE? | 7665 |
{
"text": [
"13.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
201
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.007 | From these results, we note that the devices containing pristine BDT-C1 as HTM work quite well, yielding the highest average PCE of 13.4% (scan forward: Voc=1001 mV, Jsc=18.4 mA cm−2, FF=75.7% and PCE=13.9%; scan backward: Voc=989 mV, Jsc=18.3 mA cm−2, FF=71.3% and PCE=12.9%, scan rate: 10 mV/s). | What is the value of PCE? | 4608 |
{
"text": [
"0.4 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
19
]
} | 10.1039/C1CP21762C | A portion of 0.4 × 0.4 cm2 was selected on the coated FTO glass as the active area by removing the side portions by scrapping. | What is the value of active area? | 62196 |
{
"text": [
"4.06%"
],
"answer_start": [
166
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2014.08.012 | For example, at a fixed mass ratio of 10:0.6, the η in Test W4 (DSSC with a TiO2/Li0.01Ni0.99O electrode) and Test W7 (DSSC with a TiO2/Li0.02Ni0.98O electrode) were 4.06% and 6.77%, respectively (). | What is the value of η? | 37829 |
{
"text": [
"0.70V"
],
"answer_start": [
162
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.120 | Meanwhile, the DSSCs with In2.77S4 and RGO as CEs exhibited poor photovoltaic performance (Voc=0.64V, Jsc=9.63mAcm−2, FF=0.32, and PCE=1.97% for In2.77S4 CE; Voc=0.70V, Jsc=11.92mAcm−2, FF=0.61, and PCE=5.09% for RGO CE) (). | What is the value of Voc? | 51954 |
{
"text": [
"2.64%"
],
"answer_start": [
173
]
} | 10.1039/C3RA45170D | The extended conjugation between phthalocyanine and cyanoacrylic acid (Dye 24) was also not helpful in achieving better efficiency (Jsc = 6.80 mA cm−2, Voc = 576 mV and η = 2.64%). | What is the value of η? | 76342 |
{
"text": [
"0.73 V"
],
"answer_start": [
116
]
} | 10.1039/C8CS00656C | The slot-die coated perovskite film-based device showed an efficiency of 9.2% with Jsc, Voc and FF of 16.8 mA cm−2, 0.73 V and 75.6%. | What is the value of Voc? | 16600 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
491
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.09.092 | Therefore, the conical shape will provide more possibilities for the light reflections insides the nanotubes walls and enlarge the optical paths for the irradiated sun light, and then the light absorption will be enhanced as well as the photovoltaic efficiency of the DSSCs, as proved by the results in In conclusion, the conical TiO2 NTAs have been successfully prepared by adjusting the applied voltage during the two-step anodic oxidation process, and it is transferred onto the flexible ITO/PEN substrate as the photoanodes in flexible DSSCs. | What is substrate? | 30233 |
{
"text": [
"838mV"
],
"answer_start": [
206
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.121 | Obviously, with the augment of MoS42− in systems, the PCEs of Co-Fe-MoSx increase firstly and then decrease, and the DSSC with CoFe-MoSx-2 loaded CE shows the highest PCE (9.63%), Jsc (18.1mAcm−2) and Voc (838mV), which are superior to that of Pt CE based DSSC (8.23%, 16.0mAcm−2 and 765mV, respectively). | What is the value of Voc? | 54967 |
{
"text": [
"12.78mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
183
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2013.11.072 | A typical device made with the dye AN-Bu displayed a maximal photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) 65% in the region of 350–510nm, a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) 12.78mAcm−2, an open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) 0.73V, and a fill factor (FF) 0.67, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency 6.23%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 26202 |
{
"text": [
"1.15 V"
],
"answer_start": [
104
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA02206A | The device VOC displays a unique nonmonotonic dependence on temperature, achieving the maximum value of 1.15 V at around 200 K. | What is the value of VOC? | 14955 |
{
"text": [
"0.79 V"
],
"answer_start": [
82
]
} | 10.1039/C9TA04366G | 1b and Table 1 show, the device with the PCBM/ZnO ETL achieved a much higher Voc (0.79 V) compared with the device with the bare PCBM ETL, leading to a PCE improvement from 11.0% to 18.1% and Voc loss reduction from 0.6 V to 0.4 V. | What is the value of Voc? | 15741 |
{
"text": [
"21.49 mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
56
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.098 | The pristine mp-TiO2 device yielded PCEs of 16.04% (JSC=21.49 mAcm−2, VOC=1.085V, FF=68.14%) and 16.80% (JSC=21.52 mAcm−2, VOC=1.095V, FF=71.09%) in forward and reversed scans, respectively. | What is the value of JSC? | 6100 |
{
"text": [
"4.06%"
],
"answer_start": [
113
]
} | 10.1039/C8SE00442K | Device 1# exhibits a relatively low performance with a Voc of 1.26 V, Jsc of 6.20 mA cm−2, FF of 0.52 and PCE of 4.06%. | What is the value of PCE? | 17123 |
{
"text": [
"72.24%"
],
"answer_start": [
71
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA02755E | 5A(c), with Jsc, Voc, FF and PCE increasing to 18.55 mA cm−2, 0.763 V, 72.24% and 10.07%, respectively. | What is the value of FF? | 73961 |
{
"text": [
"9.17%"
],
"answer_start": [
71
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.07.153 | The average PCE values for these five kinds of DSSCs are 7.79%, 8.59%, 9.17%, 9.10%, and 9.41%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 42469 |
{
"text": [
"0.4310V"
],
"answer_start": [
13
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2016.08.021 | The Voc were 0.4310V and 0.4447V, the short circuit Jsc were 0.3753mA/cm2 and 0.4415mA/cm2, the Mpp was 0.1733mW and 0.2343mW and the FF was 0.4991 and 0.5457, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 27308 |
{
"text": [
"7.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
81
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.047 | For example, the MASr0.2Pb0.8 I3−xClx-based device (device D) shows a low PCE of 7.3% with a largely reduced photocurrent. | What is the value of PCE? | 10929 |
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3Pb0.75Sn0.25I3"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR03507A | Here, we innovatively introduced C60 at the grain boundaries throughout the CH3NH3Pb0.75Sn0.25I3 (MAPb0.75Sn0.25I3) thin film, playing a role not only in in situ passivating the interfaces and reducing the pinholes of perovskite thin films, but also in preventing the penetration of moisture and oxygen from ambient atmosphere. | What is perovskite? | 15355 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
54
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.03.091 | High performance TiO2 electrodes were prepared on the ITO-PEN substrates by using binder-free TiO2 nanocrystalline pastes consisting of commercial P25 + 100 nm light scattering TiO2 particles combined with the mechanical compression technique, resulting in a power conversion efficiency of 5.86% under 100 mW cm− 2. | What is substrate? | 35630 |
{
"text": [
"7"
],
"answer_start": [
107
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.02.100 | The Nyquist plots of the DSSCs with different dyes are shown in , which had a TiO2 photoanode thickness of 7.0 ± 0.2 μm. | What is TiO2? | 32183 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
236
]
} | 10.1039/B603706B | As shown in Table 1, the excited state oxidation potential (Eox*) of the dyes (D-SS: −1.73 vs Ag/Ag+, −0.93 vsNHE; D-ST: −2.10, −1.91 vs Ag/Ag+, −1.30, −1.11 vsNHE) are far more negative than the band edge energy of the nanocrystalline TiO2electrode (−0.5 vsNHE), indicating that the electron injection process from the excited dye molecule to TiO2 conduction band is energetically permitted.The performance statistics of the devices are also listed in Table 1. | What is ? | 65695 |
{
"text": [
"6.11 ± 0.02%"
],
"answer_start": [
109
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.03.054 | On the other hand, the VOC, JSC, FF and η for Cell-B were 0.68 ± 0.01 V, 15.04 ± 0.04 mA cm−2, 0.60 ± 0.01%, 6.11 ± 0.02%. | What is the value of η? | 50264 |
{
"text": [
"59.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
85
]
} | 10.1039/C4NR03900A | Interestingly, a maximum η of 10.63% (Jsc = 24.34 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.737 V, and FF of 59.3%) in Fig. | What is the value of FF? | 71416 |
{
"text": [
"0.21cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.013 | The active area of the DSSCs fabricated using pristine TiO2 and MoO3 passivated TiO2 was 0.21cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 54784 |
{
"text": [
"0.1cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
50
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.03.047 | Finally, 80nm gold electrodes with active area of 0.1cm2 were thermally evaporated on top of the devices to form the back contact under a vacuum of 10−5Torr.After the deposition of perovskite films, the samples were taken out of the load-lock chamber into a N2-filled glovebox. | What is the value of active area? | 5389 |
{
"text": [
"<20"
],
"answer_start": [
99
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2019.04.007 | Ethanol and acetone were purchased from Merck Company and TiO2 paste formed from TiO2 nanoparticles<20 nm (PST-20 T) was purchased from Sharif Solar Technology Development Co. | What is TiO2? | 30785 |
{
"text": [
"2.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1039/C1CC13376D | s-DSSC fabricated with bis-EDOT-TB showed great improvements in both JSC (4.2 to 7.0 mA cm−2) and η (1.6 to 2.9%). | What is the value of η? | 65376 |
{
"text": [
"1.065 V"
],
"answer_start": [
84
]
} | 10.1039/C8CC06791K | A solar cell with spiro-OMeTAD was used as a reference (open-circuit voltage: Voc = 1.065 V/short-circuit current: Jsc = 22.26 mA cm−2/fill factor: FF = 0.748), and the other cells employing M104, KM05, and KM07 as HTMs exhibited comparable Voc (0.994–1.042 V) and Jsc (19.34–21.40 mA cm−2), leading to power conversion efficiencies (PCE) of 13.30–15.37%. | What is the value of Voc? | 17106 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
149
]
} | 10.1016/j.cclet.2017.09.056 | The use of DTP instead of CPDT gave a device with longer electron lifetimes, indicating that the recombination reaction between the electrons on the TiO2 surface and the trivalent cobalt complex in the presence of dyes with CPDT as the bridge was considerably faster than that with DTP. | What is ? | 44799 |
{
"text": [
"12.53%"
],
"answer_start": [
188
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.05.073 | The statistical PCE histogram of the devices with the structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS (or CTAB-doped PEDOT:PSS)/perovskite/ PCBM/Ag is shown in (f), the average PCE was improved from 10.21% to 12.53% with the incorporation of CTAB.In order to evaluate the charge transfer between the perovskite layer and PEDOT: PSS layer, steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy was measured using a structure of ITO/PEDOT: PSS (or CTAB-doped PEDOT:PSS) /MAPbI3 sample. | What is the value of PCE? | 7601 |
{
"text": [
"16.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
423
]
} | 10.1039/C6QM00309E | An optimal PPDIDTT thickness is based on the concentration of 0.5 mg mL−1; increasing the thickness leads to a lower short-circuit current density (JSC) and a lower FF mainly due to higher series resistance, while decreasing the thickness leads to weaker trap-passivation, electron-extraction and lower JSC.With the introduction of the dual-function PPDIDTT interfacial layer, the modified devices exhibit a maximum PCE of 16.5%, with a JSC of 21.1 mA cm−2, a VOC of 990 mV and a vFF of 79.1% (Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 15667 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
38
]
} | 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.09.013 | Consistent with this, the FTO/compact-TiO2/MAPbBr3/Spiro-OMeTAD/Ag device fabricated from the PbI2 precursor exhibits an enhanced photovoltaic performance. | What is FTO? | 8732 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
155
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC05283B | The serious efficiency loss for the SGT-023-based device could be ascribed to a fast charge recombination rate caused by the tilted adsorption mode on the TiO2 surface. | What is ? | 75511 |
{
"text": [
"3.95%"
],
"answer_start": [
139
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2017.05.020 | When only decreasing the adding amount of TBP to 100mM (doping with Li-TFSI/TBP of 30 mM/100mM), the PCE of PSC based on Q221 decreased to 3.95% with a remarkable loss in Voc and FF. | What is the value of PCE? | 2565 |
{
"text": [
"0.08cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
193
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2017.05.020 | At last, graphite power (20nm, Chenyang Graphite, China) dispersed into ethanol solution was scratched on glass and then sintered to form a carbon counter electrode with a fixed active area of 0.08cm2.Thermal properties of HTMs, including thermogravimetry (TG) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), were measured by a TG 209 F3 Tarsus (NETZSCH, Germany) and a DSC 200 F3 Maia (NETZSCH, Germany), separately.Optical performances, including UV absorption and fluorescence spectra of HTMs in solution, were performed on a SHIMADZU UV-2600 and a HITACHI F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer, respectively. | What is the value of active area? | 2553 |
{
"text": [
"4.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
77
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA13088C | In contrast, the identical DSSC with traditional I−/I3− showed a η value of ∼4.7%. | What is the value of η? | 65630 |
{
"text": [
"17.2"
],
"answer_start": [
123
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.002 | shows the comparative performances of DSSCs associated with the different TiO2 electrodes under the identical thickness of 17.2 ± 0.5 μm. | What is TiO2? | 49904 |
{
"text": [
"2.53mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
75
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.02.040 | DSSC based on EZ-20 sample showed relatively less PCE of 0.29% with Jsc of 2.53mA/cm2 and Voc of 0.36V compared to that of DSSC based on SZ-15 sample. | What is the value of Jsc? | 50593 |
{
"text": [
"550mV"
],
"answer_start": [
141
]
} | 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.06.003 | It yields an efficiency of 8.8%, as expected according to previous works [The DSCs prepared with complex C1 and electrolyte EL1 present VOC =550mV, very close to the value obtained for N719, but a significant lower JSC =0.444mA/cm2. | What is the value of VOC? | 41118 |
{
"text": [
"5.82%"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.150 | As a consequence, DSSCs constructed with the Fe2O3/CNFs CE achieved a PCE of 7.48%, which outperformed that of Pt (6.97%) and CNFs (5.82%) based counterparts under identical conditions.The CNFs were prepared via an electrospinning technique. | What is the value of PCE? | 45184 |
{
"text": [
"I3−/I−"
],
"answer_start": [
195
]
} | 10.1039/C5DT02992A | The HOMO level of 1 and N719 dyes are positive with respect to the energy level of iodine/iodide redox couple in a quasi-solid state electrolyte, so the oxidized dyes accepted electrons from the I3−/I− to be regenerated. | What is redox couple? | 70374 |
{
"text": [
"14.09%"
],
"answer_start": [
463
]
} | 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.09.066 | Additionally, this result depicts that the light absorption ability of prepared FAPb0.5Sn0.5I3 film was observed to be maximum among all FAPbxSn1-xI3 films.The prepared FAPb1-xSnxI3 and films were applied in PSCs fabrication and the current density-voltage data is obtained under one sun illuminations (see , D8 to D11) following the same method as mentioned in Section , it is clear that the PCE of device fabricated using FAPb0.5Sn0.5I3 film has maximum value (14.09%) among all devices containing SnI2. | What is the value of PCE? | 2135 |
{
"text": [
"5.34%"
],
"answer_start": [
141
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.124 | A light-to-electricity conversion efficiency (η) of 7.50% was received for the P-PZ-based DSSCs, much higher than that of the DSSCs with 2P (5.34%) and P-PT (5.96%) photoanodes. | What is the value of η? | 45029 |
{
"text": [
"6.14%"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63361-9 | By using the NiCo2S4 CE, the DSSC yielded a PCE of 6.14%, which approached that of a cell utilizing platinum CE (6.29%). | What is the value of PCE? | 36837 |
{
"text": [
"5.87%"
],
"answer_start": [
204
]
} | 10.1039/C1JM12710A | A photoelectric conversion efficiency (η) of 4.05% is obtained for the DSSC fabricated with the iodine-free electrolyte without KI, and the DSSC assembled with 5 wt% KI achieved the maximum efficiency of 5.87% with Jsc, Voc and FF of 14.11 mA cm−2, 0.71 V and 0.59, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 66342 |
{
"text": [
"1.65%"
],
"answer_start": [
170
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00586E | As seen in Table 1, they also perform worse (η = 0.63% or 0.21% for 3 or 4 equivalents) with respect to the cells treated with 0, 1 or 2 equivalents (η = 1.72%, 1.97% or 1.65%). | What is the value of η? | 70549 |
{
"text": [
"0.710 V"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA02360A | As mentioned above, the PCE of the NT-based DSC was 8.2%, with JSC = 17.1 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.710 V, and a FF = 0.680. | What is the value of VOC? | 60247 |
{
"text": [
"6.06%"
],
"answer_start": [
205
]
} | 10.1016/j.jechem.2016.05.005 | The DSSC based on BTPA produced a short-circuit photocurrent density of 14.21 mA/cm2, an open-circuit voltage of 0.62 V, and a fill factor of 0.69, thereby yielding an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 6.06%. | What is the value of η? | 43002 |
{
"text": [
"Bare"
],
"answer_start": [
4
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.199 | For Bare MWCNT counter electrodes, MWCNT was dispersed in ethanol and CMC binder without enzymes and deposited on FTO substrate as explained for E-MWCNT CE.To prepare photo anode, P25 and titania nanotubes (TNT) paste were prepared and coated on the FTO glass according to our previous work , the dye absorbed photo anode and E-MWCNT counter electrode were assembled using 60 μm ionomer surlyn seal followed by hot press at 80 °C. | What is CE? | 53303 |
{
"text": [
"15.12mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.090 | The 4,4′-dihexyl-2,2′-bithiophene bridged dye D7 gave Jsc, Voc, and FF of 15.12mAcm−2, 724mV, and 67.8%, respectively, corresponding to an efficiency of 7.41%。Compared to S-C6 (5.23%, ), the PCE of D7 (7.41%) was increased significantly, although their structures varied slightly (only the positions of alkyl chains were different). | What is the value of Jsc? | 52394 |
{
"text": [
"0.75V"
],
"answer_start": [
182
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.063 | However, the co-sensitized solar cell devices L1/N719, L2/N719 and L3/N719 showed η value of 6.68% (with Jsc=14.49mA cm−2, Voc=0.74V, and FF=0.63), 6.92% (with Jsc=14.60mA cm−2, Voc=0.75V, and FF=0.63), and 6.38% (with Jsc=14.14mA cm−2, Voc=0.72V, and FF=0.62), respectively.The higher η value of co-sensitized solar cell compared with the individually N719 sensitized devices, is attributed to the enhanced photovoltaic parameters Jsc and Voc. | What is the value of Voc? | 41615 |
{
"text": [
"9.82%"
],
"answer_start": [
40
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.11.071 | The PCE of DSSC using CoS/rGO0.10 CE is 9.82%, which is higher than that of DSSC with Pt CE (8.24%). | What is the value of PCE? | 49079 |
{
"text": [
"0s"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.133 | Consistent with the result of Rs measurements, the DSSC with the patterned FTO electrode obtained by etching time of 300s exhibited a much larger charge transfer impedance at the TiO2/electrolyte interface. | What is the value of time? | 35236 |
{
"text": [
"6.54%"
],
"answer_start": [
59
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA07644D | The NP/NF–ZnO photoanode also exhibited the maximum PCE of 6.54%, which was higher by 26.5% than that of NP/NF (5.17%) the same electrolyte. | What is the value of PCE? | 61289 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
127
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA09262D | The photovoltaic performances of the YD2-o-C8-TBA/D149 co-sensitized ZnO DSSCs were optimized using the ZnO anodes prepared on ITO–glass substrates. | What is substrate? | 76116 |
{
"text": [
"20.06 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.01.009 | The Jsc is increased from 19.83 mA/cm2 for pure CBZ treated PSCs to 20.06 mA/cm2 for pure ETH treated PSCs, and further to 20.49 mA/cm2 for pure SBA treated PSCs. | What is the value of Jsc? | 3286 |
{
"text": [
"0.58 V"
],
"answer_start": [
226
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.01.005 | Among these three novel organic sensitizers, the EHTt dye composed of a fully fused hexa-arene core and less bulky N-alkyl groups caused the DSSC to show the best photovoltaic performance with an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.58 V, a short-circuit photocurrent density (JSC) of 13.72 mA/cm2, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.69, yielding an overall power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 5.52% under AM 1.5G solar irradiation.The growing demands on energy and the concerns of environmental issues have driven scientists to develop new technologies that can efficiently exploit renewable energy resources in the past two decades. | What is the value of VOC? | 58445 |
{
"text": [
"8.14%"
],
"answer_start": [
82
]
} | 10.1039/C5CP05986K | Thus, the best cell gives Jsc = 17.03 mA cm−2, Voc = 683 mV, FF = 0.70, and PCE = 8.14% under standard AM1.5G one-sun irradiation, which exhibits remarkable overall efficiency improvement of 35% as compared with the device individually sensitized by the porphyrin dye FNE59. | What is the value of PCE? | 70439 |
{
"text": [
"6.86%"
],
"answer_start": [
193
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM16131A | The short-circuit current density (JSC) and power-conversion efficiency (η) of the DSSC based on 0.25 wt% of MWCNT/POEM hybrid into the gel electrolyte were demonstrated to be 15.3 mA cm−2 and 6.86% respectively. | What is the value of η? | 65709 |
{
"text": [
"10.55%"
],
"answer_start": [
41
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.09.056 | At 3:2MA/FA, the device exhibited PCE of 10.55%. | What is the value of PCE? | 7126 |
{
"text": [
"38 Ω"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1039/C1JM11145K | Rct1 values of DSSC with GCEs annealed at 450 °C and 600 °C are found to be about 46 Ω and 38 Ω, respectively. | What is the value of Rct1? | 74980 |
{
"text": [
"9.81%"
],
"answer_start": [
209
]
} | 10.1039/C7TC05238C | Overall, the photovoltaic performance of the DPA–ANT–DPA based device achieves the highest PCE of 11.5% among all these materials without any additives, whereas the BTPA-3-based device exhibits a close PCE of 9.81% using Li-TFSI and tBP as dopants. | What is the value of PCE? | 15020 |
{
"text": [
"594mV"
],
"answer_start": [
138
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.01.010 | We obtained a solar energy to electricity conversion efficiency of 1.10% (Jsc=2.51mAcm−2, Voc=597mV, FF=0.73), 1.18% (Jsc=2.90mAcm−2, Voc=594mV, FF=0.68), 2.27% (Jsc=4.62mAcm−2, Voc=662mV, FF=0.74) and 2.70% (Jsc=5.42mAcm−2, Voc=664mV, FF=0.74) with DSCs based on D-1, D-2, D-3 and D-4, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 30905 |
{
"text": [
"16.0mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
117
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.12.028 | Finally, the PCE of QX15-based cell reached about 80% of the commercial Ru(II) dye N719-based cell (Voc: 771mV; Jsc: 16.0mAcm−2; PCE: 7.91%) which was fabricated and measured under the same standard conditions.In order to understand the reason of the different Jsc of these dyes, the IPCE measurements of QX15–18 based cells have been performed. | What is the value of Jsc? | 48336 |
{
"text": [
"4.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
11
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA07064J | The PCE of 4.1%, was a record value for a hybrid polymer SC.An innovative approach for circumventing both the ligand and morphology problems for hybrid polymer:NP films involves in situ NP formation within semiconducting polymer films. | What is the value of PCE? | 18072 |
{
"text": [
"0.64 V"
],
"answer_start": [
96
]
} | 10.1016/j.materresbull.2016.05.027 | The results of DSSCs with conventional Pt electrodes produced of 7.08% (Jsc= 14.90 mAcm⿿2, Voc= 0.64 V, FF = 73.74%). | What is the value of Voc? | 51137 |
{
"text": [
"380"
],
"answer_start": [
44
]
} | 10.1016/j.mssp.2014.12.028 | The absorbance band edge of ZnO lays around 380 nm in the near UV region and as a consequence of doping, the band edge shifted towards the visible region around 390–400 nm. | What is ZnO? | 55632 |
{
"text": [
"6.15%"
],
"answer_start": [
254
]
} | 10.1039/C3CP51633D | The introduction of the EDOT group in D3 increases the spectral response and perhaps renders a better degree of charge separation, resulting in a leap in the photovoltaic performance in comparison to D2, and exhibits a conversion efficiency η as high as 6.15%. | What is the value of η? | 69416 |
{
"text": [
"0.69 V"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA07064J | Although the values for Voc for the P3HT:TiO2 SCs were respectable (0.60 to 0.69 V) the Jsc values were low (less than or equal to 3.10 mA cm−2). | What is the value of Voc? | 18074 |
{
"text": [
"6.6"
],
"answer_start": [
252
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | The authors selected two types of carbon CEs including a carbon black/flaky graphite (FG) composite and carbon black/spheroidal graphite (SG) composite to fabricate devices, and achieved PCEs of 4.08% (Jsc = 10.6 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.825 V, FF = 0.46) and 6.64% (Jsc = 12.4 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.878 V, FF = 0.61), respectively. | What is ? | 13464 |
{
"text": [
"20.46%"
],
"answer_start": [
56
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.070 | The optimized device with CsPbBr3 NPs exhibits a PCE of 20.46% with negligible hysteresis and good stability.The Cs−oleate solution was synthesized by Cs2CO3 (0.814g, Sigma-Aldrich), 30mL octadecene (ODE, 90%, Alfa Aesar) and 2.5mL oleic acid (OA, 90%, Alfa Aesar) in a 100mL flask. | What is the value of PCE? | 8183 |
{
"text": [
"1.57%"
],
"answer_start": [
79
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.10.103 | The counter electrode ITO/Cr/DLC (n-type) gave a best conversion efficiency of 1.57% when the n-type DLC is deposited for 10.5 min. | What is the value of efficiency? | 28868 |
{
"text": [
"2.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
194
]
} | 10.1016/j.inoche.2013.06.047 | FT22- and FT61-sensitized cells containing electrolyte A afforded Jsc values of 7.4 and 15.2 mA cm− 2, Voc values of 0.40 and 0.47 V, fill factors (ff) of 0.67 and 0.65, and efficiencies (η) of 2.0% and 4.6%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 45009 |
{
"text": [
"15.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
333
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA09520D | Due to the low temperature solution processability of the ZnO electron conductor, we could demonstrate a highly efficient PEN (poly-ethylenenaphthalate)/ITO/ZnO/CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite/PTAA/Au flexible planar solar cell with 1.1 V open-circuit voltage (Voc), 18.7 short-circuit current density (mA cm−2) Jsc, 75% fill factor (FF), and 15.4% η for the forward scan direction and 1.1 V Voc, 18.7 mA cm−2Jsc, 76% FF and 15.6% η for the reverse scan direction under illumination of 1 Sun.Solar energy has been considered as an alternative energy source for replacing conventional fossil fuel because it is clean, abundant, renewable and sustainable. | What is the value of η? | 22098 |
{
"text": [
"7.04Ωcm2"
],
"answer_start": [
148
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.086 | In addition, the Rs values of FeTa2O6, CoTa2O6, and CuTa10O26 are 7.45, 10.08, and 10.53Ωcm2, respectively, higher than the Rs value of FeTa2O6/SC (7.04Ωcm2), Pt (8.09Ωcm2), CuTa10O26/SC (7.98Ωcm2), and CoTa2O6/SC (7.02Ωcm2). | What is the value of Rs? | 43700 |
{
"text": [
"N719"
],
"answer_start": [
138
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.014 | More interestingly, the conversion efficiencies of these quasi-solid-state DSSCs based on a triphenylamine dye (SD2) and a ruthenium dye (N719) could reach rather high values of 7.40% and 7.55%, respectively, which are up to 94% of those with liquid electrolytes. | What is electrolyte? | 38295 |
{
"text": [
"0.94V"
],
"answer_start": [
145
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.005 | When the thickness of the ZrO2 film changed from 305nm to 167nm, the PCE of the device increased from 8.53% to 11.33%, Voc changed from 0.89V to 0.94V, Jsc changed from 20.87mA·cm−2 to 22.72mA·cm−2, and FF changed from 45.9% to 53%. | What is the value of Voc? | 10768 |
{
"text": [
"18.60"
],
"answer_start": [
40
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.071 | From (a), the JSC decreased by 26% from 18.60 to 13.72 mA/cm2, the FF decreased from 0.74 to 0.59 by about 20%, and the PCEmaintained56% of the original value undergoing a decrease from 13.55% to 7.56%. | What is ? | 5535 |
{
"text": [
"8.58%"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA01665G | The performance of device A containing TP3 and YR6 in a solution of molar ratio 500:1 led to the η value of 8.58%, and it increased to 9.17% for device B and 9.28% for device C when the devices were prepared at the TP3/YR6 molar ratios of 100:1 and 50:1, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 64069 |
{
"text": [
"1.51 V"
],
"answer_start": [
211
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00237G | 5a, the J–V curve results show that with a reflective Al (Al-based) electrode and a thick layer of perovskite (180 nm) as a back subcell, the hybrid tandem solar cell can attain its highest PCE = 9.13% at VOC = 1.51 V, JSC = 9.91 mA cm−2 and FF = 0.61. | What is the value of VOC? | 22759 |
{
"text": [
"0.70V"
],
"answer_start": [
43
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.02.077 | The relatively larger VOC observed in DM1 (0.70V) and DM2 (0.67V) when compared to their corresponding isomers suggests that the methyl unit substitution near donor has possibly reduced the charge recombination by retarding the approach of triiodide (I3−) at the TiO2 surface than dyes MA1 (0.57V), MA2 (0.64V) which has shown lower VOC.To elucidate further the effect of methyl group in DM and MA dyes on the performance of DSSC, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were conducted. | What is the value of VOC? | 36271 |
{
"text": [
"70%"
],
"answer_start": [
90
]
} | 10.1039/B714323K | The Jsc, Voc and ff of the device equipped with Electrode 1 are 8.26 mA cm−2, 0.736 V and 70%, respectively, yielding an overall η of 4.23%. | What is the value of ff? | 62904 |
{
"text": [
"ZnO"
],
"answer_start": [
90
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.012 | The XRD analysis confirmed the formation of a crystalline wurtzite hexagonal structure of ZnO. | What is ? | 40974 |
{
"text": [
"13%"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA09661H | Recently, Kaltenbrunner and his co-workers reported ultrathin (3 μm), highly flexible PSCs with a stabilized PCE up to 13% (Table 1 and Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 16936 |
{
"text": [
"7.76%"
],
"answer_start": [
9
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA16493H | The η of 7.76% was achieved by using the WS-6 sensitizer along without co-adsorbed DCA. | What is the value of η? | 72806 |
{
"text": [
"0.99 V"
],
"answer_start": [
50
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06987H | Devices with doped HTM 21 possessed a high VOC of 0.99 V and a high FF (71.4%), but a lower photocurrent JSC (17.3 mA cm−2) as compared to devices employing doped HTM Sp01, owing to the similar phenomena that contribute to there being no photocurrent in between HTM 19 or 20 with the MAPbI3 perovskite layer. | What is the value of VOC? | 13014 |
{
"text": [
"21.45mA·cm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
376
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.069 | It is quite obvious that the TBP-based PSCs yields a superior photovoltaic performance with a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 22.95mA·cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.03V, and a fill-factor (FF) of 0.722, leading an enhanced PCE up to 17.06%, and on a contrary the pristine PSCs (0 v% or without TBP addition) merely gives an inferior performance with a Jsc of 21.45mA·cm−2, a Voc of 0.980, and a FF of 0.693, eventually leading to a PCE value of mere 14.56%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 11339 |
{
"text": [
"15.58%"
],
"answer_start": [
41
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP06486H | The device delivered a reasonable PCE of 15.58% even with a PC61BM film thickness of 120 nm (device F; see Table 1 and Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 15415 |
{
"text": [
"6.18%"
],
"answer_start": [
125
]
} | 10.1039/C3RA47084A | Compared with LE based devices, QE based devices presented much better photovoltaic performance and presented a PCE up to of 6.18%.The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (863, no. | What is the value of PCE? | 60891 |
{
"text": [
"65.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
37
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.07.107 | Two DSCs showed similar performance (65.8% in FF and 7.4% in efficiency without annealing and 66.1% in FF and 7.4% in efficiency with annealing). | What is the value of FF? | 52386 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.