answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"1.05V"
],
"answer_start": [
213
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.01.002 | The best-performing device, i.e., that based on FEH, exhibits a PCE of 18.0% with a VOC of 1.06V, a JSC of 22.8mAcm−2, and an FF of 74.5%, while the Spiro-OMeTAD-based device exhibits a PCE of 17.0% with a VOC of 1.05V, a JSC of 22.7mAcm−2, and an FF of 71.2%. | What is the value of VOC? | 11757 |
{
"text": [
"6.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
19
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA05226A | reported a PCE of 16.7% with a spiro-OMeTAD isomer with some of the methoxy substituents in the ortho-positions. | What is the value of PCE? | 16029 |
{
"text": [
"0.40%"
],
"answer_start": [
140
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2012.08.002 | The I–V measurement performs that the optimum immersion time of 30 min can be yielded the highest power energy conversion efficiency (η) of 0.40% with a photocurrent density (Jsc) of 2.14 mA/cm2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.649 V, a fill factor (FF) of 33.1%. | What is the value of η? | 39505 |
{
"text": [
"4.21%"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
} | 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.12.029 | There is an increase of power conversion efficiency (η) from 3.44% to 4.21% following by decreasing to 4.04% with the increase of film thickness.In order to study the effects of the different four hierarchical SnO2 microspheres on the photovoltaic properties, the DSSCs comprising four hierarchical SnO2 microspheres photoanodes are tested under AM 1.5G illumination (100mWcm−2). | What is the value of η? | 55392 |
{
"text": [
"7.38%"
],
"answer_start": [
78
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.037 | In particular, the DSC based on Co-Ni-Se-1:1 CE achieves a respectable PCE of 7.38% (Voc=0.65V, Jsc=17.46mAcm−2, and FF=0.65), which is larger than that of the DSC based on Pt CE (PCE=6.73%, Voc=0.66V, Jsc=15.21mAcm−2, and FF=0.67). | What is the value of PCE? | 53107 |
{
"text": [
"12.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
63
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06987H | Therefore, devices based on MY11 doped HTM 27 yielded a PCE of 12.0% after improving in a broad working range from 350–800 nm, as seen from the IPCE spectrum. | What is the value of PCE? | 13085 |
{
"text": [
"13.12%"
],
"answer_start": [
56
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA05413J | PDMS film, which results in an increase in the PCE from 13.12% to 14.01%, corresponding to a 6.8% increment. | What is the value of PCE? | 14567 |
{
"text": [
"63%"
],
"answer_start": [
141
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.05.024 | Importantly, the short circuit current density (Jsc) (22.6 mA/cm2) and fill factor (FF) (71%) with respect to TiO2-dye anodes (15.75 mA/cm2, 63%) . | What is the value of FF? | 39735 |
{
"text": [
"22.91mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
104
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.08.039 | Based on the C60-SAM modified TiO2, we successfully fabricated the device with a Voc of 1.08V, a Jsc of 22.91mA/cm2, an FF of 0.72, and an overall PCE of 17.8%, exhibiting significant increases of Voc, Jsc and FF compared to unmodified and PC61BM modified PSCs. | What is the value of Jsc? | 11256 |
{
"text": [
"11.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.12.002 | The vacuum processed perovskite solar cells showed relatively high reproducibility showing the average value of PCE of 11.1%.Recently, hybrid organic/inorganic perovskite (e.g., CH3NH3PbI3) based solar cells attract large attention because of the remarkably high power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) combined with low temperature processes In this regard, the widely used spiro-OMeTAD is not an optimized HTM for the CH3NH3PbI3 based solar cells, since spiro-OMeTAD possesses a few hundred meV higher HOMO level than VB edge of CH3NH3PbI3. | What is the value of PCE? | 8457 |
{
"text": [
"18.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
186
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.035 | The introduction of a thin imidazolium iodide layer between the perovskite and HTM interface improved the photovoltaic parameters in terms of Voc and FF and an increment in the PCE from 18.6% to c.a 20% were measured for an optimized ImI-passivated perovskite solar cells. | What is the value of PCE? | 11764 |
{
"text": [
"1.19%"
],
"answer_start": [
78
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.08.012 | As the result, the solar energy-to-electricity conversion yield (η) of SAT-2 (1.19%) is similar to that of SAT-1 (1.11%). | What is the value of η? | 47941 |
{
"text": [
"18.54%"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.036 | The optimum performance of planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells demonstrated a PCE of 18.54% with a higher Voc of 1.10V, an average steady-state PCE of 18.10% and potent stability in dry condition under dark. | What is the value of PCE? | 8152 |
{
"text": [
"0 h"
],
"answer_start": [
212
]
} | 10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63470-4 | It was found that (1) hydrothermal treatment of TiO2-NFs in NaOH solution followed by acid washing and calcination results in the formation of TiO2-NFs-NSs; (2) upon extending the hydrothermal reaction time from 0 h to 3 h, the BET surface area of TiO2-NFs-NSs (T3.0 sample) increases 3.8 times (from 28 to 106 m2 g−1), while the pore volume increases 6.0 times (from 0.09 to 0.54 cm3 g−1); (3) when compared with those of pristine TiO2-NFs (T0 sample), the photoreactivity of the optimized TiO2-NFs-NSs toward acetone oxidation increases 3.1 times and the photoelectric conversion efficiency increases 2.3 times. | What is the value of time? | 37861 |
{
"text": [
"7.18%"
],
"answer_start": [
29
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.10.016 | Compared to the iodine cell (7.18%), the corresponding cobalt cell exhibits a slightly decreased PCE (7.06%) primarily due to the remarkably decreased JSC. | What is the value of PCE? | 51697 |
{
"text": [
"4.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.09.019 | The power conversion efficiencies (η) for the XS28 and XS30 are 4.9% and 5.4%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 52420 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
159
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.041 | The device structure consists of solid state planar heterojunction p-i-n having intrinsic perovskite absorber layer between n-type an electron transport layer TiO2 and p-type HTM, as shown in . | What is electron transport layer? | 3990 |
{
"text": [
"7.95%"
],
"answer_start": [
37
]
} | 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.11.057 | The PCE of ZnO NSs/NAs-DSSCs reached 7.95%.Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at | What is the value of PCE? | 56944 |
{
"text": [
"3.53%"
],
"answer_start": [
154
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.122 | Even though all modified photoanodes introduce enhanced efficiency (η), Ga0.25Te0.75ZnO photoanode based cell reaches the highest η of 7.08%, compared to 3.53% achieved by pure ZnO at the same conditions. | What is the value of η? | 37297 |
{
"text": [
"830 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC03542C | The device based on the D35 dye with the PEDOT hole transporting material was slightly more efficient than that employing PEDOP, with a VOC of 830 mV, JSC of 8.19 mA cm−2, FF of 0.68 and PCE of 4.6%. | What is the value of VOC? | 70877 |
{
"text": [
"7.82%"
],
"answer_start": [
257
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.03.015 | The HKK-BTZ4 sensitized cell under standard global AM 1.5 solar condition gave a JSC of 17.9 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.62 V, and FF of 0.66, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency η of 7.30%, while the Ru dye N719-sensitized TiO2 showed an efficiency of 7.82% with a JSC of 17.5 mA/cm−2, a VOC of 0.62 V, and a FF of 0.72, under the same DCA concentration of 80 mM (see To get a further insight into the difference in performance of DSSCs sensitized by all the dyes, density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed at B3LYP/6-31G* level and at TDDFT calculations performed by MPW1 K/631G* in THF by means of CPCM model for the geometry optimization. | What is the value of η? | 37105 |
{
"text": [
"CA-Q"
],
"answer_start": [
136
]
} | 10.1039/C9NR02903F | As a result, the CA-F CE, with the largest specific surface area of 643 m2 g−1, has the highest η value of 8.52 ± 0.02% among the CA-O, CA-Q and CA-F CEs, which have various R/F molar ratios. | What is CE? | 63617 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
267
]
} | 10.1016/j.vacuum.2011.10.026 | The thickness of TiO2 films were measured by surface profiler (DEKTAK 150, Veeco).Photocurrent-voltage characteristics of solar cells were measured using a voltage–current source monitor (Orzel Sol 3A Newport) under illumination by a Newport solar simulator (AM 1.5, 100mWcm−2) with a scan rate of 10mVs−1.Time-resolved photovoltage was measured to study the photovoltage decay of DSSC and lifetime of the photogenerated charge carriers. | What is the value of illumination? | 24423 |
{
"text": [
"ZnO"
],
"answer_start": [
216
]
} | 10.1039/C5CE01438G | We also thank the Central Instrumentation Facilities (CIF), Pondicherry University for materials characterization.† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Table showing experimental data for different ZnO morphologies and their grain sizes calculated by using Scherrer's equation, and figures showing the XRD pattern of hybrid photoanode films coated on FTO, Raman spectra of individual and hybrid ZnO, magnified FE-SEM images of ZnO flowers and BET surface area measurements, the Tauc plot from the diffuse reflectance spectra of the different hierarchical ZnO flowers and the combined J–V curve of the different hierarchical individual ZnO flowers as well as hybrid photoanode films. | What is ? | 60148 |
{
"text": [
"9.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1039/B917886D | With the O-TiNT film, the Isc was dramatically increased up to 18.5 mA cm−2, with Voc of 0.770 V, FF of 0.64, and η of 9.1%. | What is the value of η? | 65449 |
{
"text": [
"MAPbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
37
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.09.064 | The PC61BM ETLs were prepared on the MAPbI3 perovskite layers by spin-coating chlorobenzene solution of PC61BM (20mgmL−1) at 1500rpm for 45s and dried at 70°C for 10min; after that the saturated methanol solution of BCP was dripped on top of the PC61BM layers during spin-coating at 6000 rmp and dried at 70°C for 10min again. | What is perovskite? | 813 |
{
"text": [
"4.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
52
]
} | 10.1039/C8DT00413G | For dye PorF, Device A, the highest PCE obtained is 4.1% with a VOC of 0.700 V, a JSC of 7.7 mA cm−2 and a FF of 75%. | What is the value of PCE? | 67485 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
116
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.070 | Simultaneously, in virtue of the light-scattering property, CBHA could effectively reflect the light leaked through TiO2 photoanodes for better light-harvesting efficiency of DSSCs. | What is photoanodes? | 25959 |
{
"text": [
"7.56%"
],
"answer_start": [
109
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.06.127 | When the π-bridge was changed from thiophene to furan, the resultant dye QX08 obtained relative lower PCE of 7.56% with a smaller Jsc of 14.2mAcm−2 and a lower Voc of 745mV than that of QX07.To investigate the reason of the significantly different Jsc values of the four dyes, the IPCE (incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency) spectra measurements of QX05–08 have been performed (). | What is the value of PCE? | 47077 |
{
"text": [
"0.580V"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.09.045 | For the bare TiO2 nanotubes, the DSSCs exhibited a Jsc value of 5.64mAcm−2, a Voc value of 0.580V and a fill factor (FF) of 0.570, yielding an overall conversion efficiency of 1.86%. | What is the value of Voc? | 39560 |
{
"text": [
"66.0±0.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
187
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.09.072 | Among the three types of PSCs prepared from nanorod arrays, the NR-B PSC samples show the best photovoltaic performance with an average Voc of 0.99±0.01V, Jsc of 22.7±0.5mAcm−2 and FF of 66.0±0.4%, leading to average efficiencies of 14.90±0.56% and the best efficiency of 15.46%. | What is the value of FF? | 799 |
{
"text": [
"93mV"
],
"answer_start": [
120
]
} | 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.02.008 | The p-DSCs made with YK-2 also achieved a significant improvement in photovoltaic performance of 0.054% with the Voc of 93mV, Jsc of 1.95mAcm−2, and FF of 29.54% with the thickness of NiO was 4 layers. | What is the value of Voc? | 36192 |
{
"text": [
"100 mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
152
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.132 | Keithley 2400 Source Meter was used to measure the I−V characteristics of the DSSCs using IV-5 solar simulator (Sr #83, PV Measurement, Inc) at AM1.5G (100 mWcm−2). | What is the value of solar? | 32118 |
{
"text": [
"100 W/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
244
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.07.001 | Based on these investigations, the particle size, shape and film surface morphology have been obtained.The photocurrent–voltage (J–V curves) of the DSSC was measured with a digital source meter (Keithley, Model 2400) under AM 1.5 illumination (100 W/cm2). | What is the value of illumination? | 37687 |
{
"text": [
"1110 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
385
]
} | 10.1039/C8RA10014D | (iii) These cells can be charged even in diffused and very low illumination sources.The present study of metanil yellow dye as a photosensitizer and formic acid as a reductant in the presence of sodium lauryl sulphate surfactant and sodium hydroxide alkaline medium shows greatly enhanced electrical performance (over earlier results for similar cells) of Ppp 822 μW, isc 6000 μA, Voc 1110 mV, CE 20.41%, and t0.5 105 minutes. | What is the value of Voc? | 72322 |
{
"text": [
"9.33%"
],
"answer_start": [
61
]
} | 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.01.106 | Subsequently O2 plasma treatment further improves the PCE to 9.33%, reflecting a 17% increase compared to the cell without surface treatment.► TiO2 nanofiber cell with a thickness of ∼50 μm gave a conversion efficiency (PCE) of 7.96%. | What is the value of PCE? | 43870 |
{
"text": [
"3.80%"
],
"answer_start": [
159
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA04883K | The uncoated WO3 NS-based cells exhibit a photocurrent density (Jsc) of 6.48 mA cm−2, a Voc of 780 mV, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.75, which leads to a PCE of 3.80%. | What is the value of PCE? | 16092 |
{
"text": [
"353 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
110
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2013.07.028 | Among these dyes, J3 gives the best photoelectric conversion efficiency of 1.52% with Jsc= 7.53 mA cm–2, Voc= 353 mV, FF= 0.57. | What is the value of Voc? | 40563 |
{
"text": [
"9.81%"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1016/j.jechem.2015.10.003 | Eventually, PCE of the C-PSCs based on SO-DP-4000-P has reached 9.81% with good stability. | What is the value of PCE? | 276 |
{
"text": [
"8.05%"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA18729C | After solvent vapour treatment of CH3NH3PbI3−XClX films the η ∼ 8.05% with short circuit current density (JSC) 21.37 mA cm−2, open circuit voltage (VOC) 0.8 V and fill factor 0.47 was obtained. | What is the value of η? | 22720 |
{
"text": [
"Au"
],
"answer_start": [
85
]
} | 10.1039/C8EE02284D | 3b shows the dark I–V measurement of MA2PbI4 films in devices with an FTO/perovskite/Au structure. | What is FTO? | 20069 |
{
"text": [
"12.68mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.09.009 | DPP-I-sensitized cell gave a short circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 12.68mAcm−2, an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.568V and a fill factor (ff) of 0.61, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 4.41% and DPP-II-sensitized cell gave a short circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 7.78mAcm−2, an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.650V and a fill factor (ff) of 0.58, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 2.93%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 33046 |
{
"text": [
"4.33%"
],
"answer_start": [
21
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2014.03.086 | A highest η value of 4.33% of the cell sensitized with SDD4 and CDCA as coadsorbent was obtained at 1.0mM CDCA bath, which increased by 10.5% compared with SDD4-sensitized cell (3.92%), reaching 82% of a standard device fabricated with N719 (η=5.25%). | What is the value of η? | 45524 |
{
"text": [
"9.67%"
],
"answer_start": [
85
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109349 | PMA/PVAc decreases the Jsc from 27.87 to 22.91mAcm−2 and efficiency, η from 12.28 to 9.67%. | What is the value of η? | 48712 |
{
"text": [
"2 h"
],
"answer_start": [
60
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.11.008 | Through a detailed study of the cutting time, we found that 2 h ultrasonication resulted in the lowest charge transport resistance and the highest overall energy conversion efficiency. | What is the value of time? | 26620 |
{
"text": [
"1.02 V"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1039/C9TC01741K | 4b and Table 2 (obtained from forward scans) provide additional details regarding the FM (1:1)-based PSC, which had the open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.02 V, Jsc of 22.6 mA cm−2, and FF of 73.2%. | What is the value of Voc? | 14764 |
{
"text": [
"10.76%"
],
"answer_start": [
281
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA04526J | The introduction of up-converting β-NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+ phosphor microcrystals dispersed in an iodide electrolyte and the use of an additional phosphor reflecting film increases the overall solar-to-electrical energy conversion efficiency (η) from 9.02% of reference DSSCs to 9.48 and 10.76%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 74072 |
{
"text": [
"29.2 mA"
],
"answer_start": [
100
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA01651D | This decrease in PCE is mainly caused by a significant decrease in short-circuit current (ISC) from 29.2 mA to 11.5 mA, which is also evidenced by a decrease in the external quantum efficiency (EQE) as indicated in Fig. | What is the value of ISC? | 20036 |
{
"text": [
"2.54%"
],
"answer_start": [
336
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2014.09.007 | This positive shift of the conduction band reduces the gap between the Fermi level of TiO2 and redox potential of electrolyte, leading to the increased recombination rate and lower open-circuit voltage Under standard global AM 1.5 solar conditions, the power conversion efficiencies (η) of the cells sensitized with CBZ-1–3 were 1.54%, 2.54% and 3.23%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 55964 |
{
"text": [
"0.19mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
67
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.07.035 | As expected, both LC molecules 3N and 3N-1 yield PCE of 0.04% (Jsc=0.19mAcm−2, Voc=455.17mV, and FF=0.5057) and 0.08% (Jsc=0.31mAcm−2, Voc=478.14mV, and FF=0.5320), respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 53929 |
{
"text": [
"iodide/triiodide"
],
"answer_start": [
492
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.08.020 | The strong absorption in the visible region of the Ag-TNTs could provide the superior photocatalytic performance, and the SPR effect of Ag can be effectively stimulated to enhance the light-harvesting efficiency of the photoanode.To confirm the stability of the treated Ag-TNTs, UV–Vis absorption spectrum of the bare and treated Ag-TNTs in electrolyte were shown in , the absorption peak Ag NPs disappear after mixed with electrolyte after a period of time, which is due to the corrosion of iodide/triiodide redox couple. | What is redox couple? | 28898 |
{
"text": [
"P3HT"
],
"answer_start": [
139
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | In 2014, Ogomi and coworkers first fabricated a series of mixed Pb/Sn alloy MASnxPb1−xI3 perovskites in a FTO/bl-TiO2/mp-TiO2/MASnxPb1−xI3/P3HT/Ag/Au-based device. | What is FTO? | 13489 |
{
"text": [
"25.61mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
98
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.009 | This was followed by Cu2O, which showed high performance after CuSCN with a PCE of 25.97%, Jsc of 25.61mA/cm2, Voc of 1150mV and FF of 88.39%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 4338 |
{
"text": [
"0.95 V"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06152D | In comparison, the conventional CH3NH3PbIxCl3−x-based planar PSCs showed a PCE of 12.59%, with Voc of 0.95 V, Jsc of 18.67 mA cm−2, and FF of 71%. | What is the value of Voc? | 14426 |
{
"text": [
"0s"
],
"answer_start": [
49
]
} | 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.133 | However, when etching duration was longer than 270s, η showed an opposite trend as compared to that of pattern depth, and reached a maximum of 7.71% as pattern depth approximated to 180nm by the etching time of around 240s. | What is the value of time? | 35234 |
{
"text": [
"7.29%"
],
"answer_start": [
118
]
} | 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.05.019 | A combination of [Cu(46)2]+ with the phosphonate anchor 43 gives a very promising performance (η= 2.35% compared with 7.29% for N719); sealed cells were made using FTO/TiO2/dye photoanodes, FTO/Pt counter-electrodes and I−/I3− electrolyte. | What is the value of η? | 46596 |
{
"text": [
"743 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
92
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.06.008 | It is observed that the Jsc, Voc and η for the Zn2SnO4 NSs photoelectrode are 8.29 mA cm−2, 743 mV and 4.82%, respectively, which are much higher than those of 7.05 mA cm−2, 733 mV, 4.01% for the DSSC based on Zn2SnO4 NPs photoelectrode. | What is the value of Voc? | 42789 |
{
"text": [
"11.47mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
183
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.12.027 | Interestingly, the decreased Voc was overcompensated by a gain in Jsc, resulting in the superior performance, the optimized PCE of LP-6 reached to 6.14% with a Voc of 710mV, a Jsc of 11.47mAcm−2 and a FF of 0.74. | What is the value of Jsc? | 25492 |
{
"text": [
"624 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
123
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.09.148 | While a cell derived from nanoflakes achieved an overall energy conversion efficiency of 3.64% with Jsc= 11.6 mA cm−2,Voc= 624 mV, and FF= 50.2%, much higher than the performance of the cell derived from nanobullets. | What is the value of Voc? | 35708 |
{
"text": [
"13.80mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2013.11.050 | The DSSC sensitized by TPTDYE 2 without DCA offered maximum energy conversion efficiency (η) of 6.85% with a Voc of 0.73V, a Jsc of 13.80mA/cm2 and an FF of 0.68, while the DSSC sensitized by TPTDYE 3 without DCA gave a η of 2.63% with a Voc of 0.65V, a Jsc of 5.95mA/cm2, and an FF of 0.68. | What is the value of Jsc? | 57321 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
274
]
} | 10.1039/C2NR31954C | Photocurrent–voltage characteristics were measured via applying an external potential bias to the device under simulated AM 1.5 G illumination (Newport, 91192) with an intensity of 90 mW cm−2, which was calibrated by a Si photodiode, and the active area was controlled by a 0.25 cm2 mask. | What is the value of active area? | 63560 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
216
]
} | 10.1039/C5GC02814K | MTEC-2015M04).† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: 2D and 3D AFM images of CZT particle films and leaf-like CZTS plate arrays, FE-SEM images, Raman spectra of nano-rounded CZTS sheet arrays on the FTO substrate, and TEM images of the nano-rounded CZTS sheet, the HR-TEM image of a single nano-rounded sheet scraped from the films of CZTS arrays, the magnified FE-SEM image of a single CZTS plate with the rough pointed cone covering on the surface, and comparison with the photoelectrochemical performance of DSSCs using various counter electrodes (CEs). | What is substrate? | 72504 |
{
"text": [
"4.89%"
],
"answer_start": [
215
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.068 | The DSSCs sensitized by FWD7 and FWD8 exhibited good photovoltaic parameters: short-circuit current density (Jsc) 9.88 and 11.59mAcm−2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) 0.69 and 0.75V, and power conversion efficiency (η) 4.89% and 6.01%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 58705 |
{
"text": [
"17.62 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1016/j.joule.2018.06.012 | A significant improvement in photovoltaic parameters, from VOC= 940mV, JSC= 17.62 mA/cm2, and FF= 27.27% (for pristine Spiro-OMeTAD device) to 990mV, 21.69 mA/cm2, and 58.68% (5.3 mol% BMPyTFSI), respectively, was observed. | What is the value of JSC? | 10298 |
{
"text": [
"0.597 V"
],
"answer_start": [
328
]
} | 10.1016/j.crci.2012.10.015 | With the addition of the LiTFSI:LiI = 0.116:1 in the CPE, the performance of the DSSC at AM1.5 increased to 4.82% with Jsc= 11.78 mA/cm2, Voc= 0.603 V and FF= 0.67, better than the 3.6% of the original DSSC with Jsc= 8.75 mA/cm−2, Voc= 0.648 V and FF= 0.635 and the 4.32% of the LiClO4 modified CPE with Jsc= 11.18 mA/cm2, Voc= 0.597 V and FF= 0.647. | What is the value of Voc? | 44631 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.05.039 | Among the solar cell devices, spiro-MeOTAD shows the best PCE of 11.54% under AM 1.5G illumination of 100mW/cm2 intensity. | What is the value of illumination? | 11074 |
{
"text": [
"552mV"
],
"answer_start": [
193
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.04.028 | The DSSCs combining [Cu(1)(2)]+ and electrolytes E7c or E7g achieve the highest values of JSC (ranging from 6.01 to 6.16mAcm−2 for the duplicate cells) and consistently good values of VOC (547–552mV for the duplicate cells), leading to the highest values of η (2.10–2.27%); see for all data. | What is the value of VOC? | 30695 |
{
"text": [
"0.125%"
],
"answer_start": [
140
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.04.056 | CdSNPs-ZnO-PANI exhibits PCE, Voc and Isc of 1.35%, 0.51 V and 7.2 mA/cm2 respectively and ZnO-PANI exhibits the lowest PCE, Voc and Isc of 0.125%, 0.34 V and 1.10 mA/cm2 respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 59222 |
{
"text": [
"0.56 V"
],
"answer_start": [
198
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA16394C | Consequently, the DSSC based on the ZnTPP–LC dyad showed a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 5.27%, which is higher than the PCE value of the LC, based DSSC (2.45% with Jsc = 7.55 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.56 V and FF = 0.58). | What is the value of Voc? | 76827 |
{
"text": [
"11.18%"
],
"answer_start": [
151
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.171 | The champion device corresponded to the TiCl4 concentration of 200 mM, which yielded a Jsc of 19.16 mA/cm2, a Voc of 1.00 V, a FF of 59%, and a PCE of 11.18%. | What is the value of PCE? | 8561 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
46
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.10.001 | A dye was loaded on the film by immersing the TiO2 film in a 0.3 mM dye N719 (Deysol, Australian and Golden Innovation Business Co) ethanol solution for 18–24 h, finally a dye-sensitized photoanode was prepared. | What is photoanode? | 50318 |
{
"text": [
"6.22%"
],
"answer_start": [
342
]
} | 10.1039/C1EE01873F | By the incorporation of such C-PCBSD modified ZnO CBL into the ICBA:P3HT BHJ solar cells to modulate the interface properties, the fabricated inverted devices (ITO/ZnO/C-PCBSD/P3HT:ICBA/PEDOT:PSS/Ag) showed an improved Jsc and an increased FF due to the enhancement of the electron collection, thus boosting the PCE to a record high value of 6.22%, which is a 29% improvement over devices (ITO/ZnO/P3HT:ICBA/PEDOT:PSS/Ag) without using C-PCBSD to modify the ZnO layer (Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 61999 |
{
"text": [
"ZnO"
],
"answer_start": [
92
]
} | 10.1016/j.jlumin.2018.11.012 | In summary, this study provides a complete investigation of the inversion in efficiency for ZnO and TiO2 photoanodes upon choice of sensitizer and the mechanism has been justified by ultrafast carrier dynamics and device characteristics as well. | What is anode? | 44417 |
{
"text": [
"glass"
],
"answer_start": [
289
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2008.10.012 | Detailed experiments and the investigation of the interfacial charge transfer processes of these dyes are in progress aiming to further increase the performance of DSSCs fabricated with this new group of dyes.Nanocrystalline TiO2 films were deposited on the fluorine-doped SnO2 conducting glass substrate (15Ωcm−2) by screen-printing a TiO2 (Degussa P25) paste. | What is substrate? | 54693 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
153
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.04.042 | The thickness of the GaN–TiO2 composite was varied from 2.7 to 10.3 μm which was determined by FESEM (not shown).The above prepared photoelectrode had a 0.25 cm2 active area which was immersed in ethanol containing 0.5 mM N719 for 24 h. | What is the value of active area? | 55083 |
{
"text": [
"0.80 V"
],
"answer_start": [
60
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA00929A | With regard to Jsc and Voc, mean values of 26.3 mA cm−2 and 0.80 V were attained, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 21668 |
{
"text": [
"65.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
107
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA07359J | The performance is significantly better than that of 40 wt% (Jsc of 15.46 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.84 V and FF of 65.1% under reverse scan direction, Jsc of 16.01 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.79 V, FF of 60.1% and PCE of 7.67% under forward scan direction) and 45 wt% (Jsc of 18 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.88 V and FF of 71.8% under reverse scan direction, Jsc of 17.97 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.84 V, FF of 67% and PCE of 10.1% under forward scan direction) precursor concentration samples, as shown in Fig. | What is the value of FF? | 15799 |
{
"text": [
"P3HT"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1039/C5CS00113G | Spiro-OMeTAD is more active than some other organic HTMs, such as P3HT, etc. | What is HTM? | 21069 |
{
"text": [
"0.872V"
],
"answer_start": [
171
]
} | 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.03.023 | A reference device, prepared without adding DMSO to the perovskite solution, exhibits a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 10.98%, with an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.872V, short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 17.22mA/cm2, and fill factor (FF) of 73.09%. | What is the value of Voc? | 237 |
{
"text": [
"3.88%"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1039/C3RA42537A | The SPS-G3 and POR individually sensitized solar cells exhibit PCE values of 5.64% and 3.88%, respectively, while the POR/SPS-G3 co-sensitized solar cell shows a PCE value of 7.35%. | What is the value of PCE? | 71991 |
{
"text": [
"10.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
224
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA02281J | In accordance with the trends in EQE spectra, the DSSCs based on C272 in a tris(1,10-phenanthroline)cobalt(II/III) electrolyte ([Co(phen)3]2+/3+) displayed a higher JSC of 15.38 mA cm−2, a VOC of 908 mV and an efficiency of 10.4% compared with C271 (JSC = 10.18 mA cm−2; VOC = 844 mV; PCE = 6.7%) without the use of co-adsorbents. | What is the value of PCE? | 67046 |
{
"text": [
"53.63%"
],
"answer_start": [
223
]
} | 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.06.011 | As can be seen from a, the short circuit current density (Isc) of Ag-TNTs-8H was the largest, the current density reached 17.26mA/cm2, the open circuit voltage (Voc) were increased to 0.78V, the filling factor (FF) reached 53.63%, and the efficiency (η) were increased to 7.20%. | What is the value of FF? | 29694 |
{
"text": [
"49%"
],
"answer_start": [
77
]
} | 10.1039/C1EE01873F | This device showed a JSC = 1.27 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.70 V, FF = 0.556, and η = 0.49%, respectively when high molecular-ordering P3HT (Rieke Metals) was used.Another simple approach to enhance the efficiency of bilayer ZnO/organic HSCs is applying porous ZnO electrodes instead of dense ZnO films, making this device geometry similar to that of ZnO/organic HSCs based on vertically aligned ZnO nanowires. | What is the value of FF? | 61995 |
{
"text": [
"0.68 V"
],
"answer_start": [
189
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA05298F | 8 and Table 2, it can be seen that the Jsc, Voc, and FF for the DSSC fabricated using the TiO2 flowers photoanode of highly branched nanorods obtained at 210 °C (Jsc = 10.04 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.68 V, FF = 45%) show noticeable improvement over the DSSC fabricated using the TiO2 flowers photoanode of cactus-like nanostructures obtained at 180 °C (Jsc = 8.14 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.64 V, FF = 51%). | What is the value of Voc? | 72865 |
{
"text": [
"0.88V"
],
"answer_start": [
81
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.01.044 | The PCEs of Pero-SCs based on P0 was 12.8% with an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.88V, short current density (Jsc) of 19.75mA/cm2 and fill factor (FF) of 73.8%. | What is the value of Voc? | 11932 |
{
"text": [
"0.53 V"
],
"answer_start": [
210
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA05916K | The average Jsc, Voc, and FF of the device improved progressively with the addition of FASCN, reaching an optimized average PCE of 7.66% under reverse scan with 5 mol% FASCN additive (Jsc = 21.8 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.53 V, and FF = 66.5%). | What is the value of Voc? | 15432 |
{
"text": [
"0.542 V"
],
"answer_start": [
67
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112191 | Based on the results, the Voc and the Isc were varied from 0.35 to 0.542 V and 0.805 to 1.417 mA, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 38270 |
{
"text": [
"0.16 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
343
]
} | 10.1039/C5TC00860C | The transmittance and diffuse reflectance spectra of the photoanodes were also obtained using the UV-visible/NIR spectrophotometer.The corresponding power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of the assembled DSSCs were determined by a source meter (Model 2420, Keithley) under full sunlight (AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm−2) with an irradiated active area of 0.16 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 76879 |
{
"text": [
"17.20mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
256
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.208 | The DSSCs using the MoS2 and RGO CEs exhibit poor conversion efficiencies of 3.60% and 4.66% due to their poor electrocatalytic activity, while the DSSCs based on the MoS2@RGO CE has an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 660mV, a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 17.20mAcm−2, a fill factor (FF) of 0.60, and a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.82% higher than Pt film (6.44%). | What is the value of Jsc? | 50370 |
{
"text": [
"20.96mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
62
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.01.016 | After 5min of light illumination, the enhanced VOC=1.03V, JSC=20.96mAcm−2 and FF=64.09% are obtained, which result in a PCE=13.84%. | What is the value of JSC? | 2013 |
{
"text": [
"58.85%"
],
"answer_start": [
117
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.002 | When we measure the device with scan range of 2 to−0.1V, Voc (0.68V) and Jsc (9.48mAcm−2) slightly increase, but FF (58.85%) decreases slightly, leading to a moderate PCE of 3.84%. | What is the value of FF? | 53871 |
{
"text": [
"7.10%"
],
"answer_start": [
118
]
} | 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.12.099 | Whereas, the DSSC with the 3D hybrid H-GNs/GF CE exhibits a VOC of 0.74 V, JSC of 13.52 mA cm−2, FF of 0.70, and η of 7.10%, which is close to that of the cell with Pt CE (7.68%) and higher than that (6.81%) of the DSSC with graphene-based CE reported by Huang et al. | What is the value of η? | 56770 |
{
"text": [
"0.77 V"
],
"answer_start": [
215
]
} | 10.1016/j.mseb.2017.03.006 | The values of Jsc, Voc, FF and η are calculated and summarized in that the open-circuit voltage (Voc) values of all NiS(NPs)/PEDOT-PSS CE – based DSSCs are relatively close to one another, ranging between 0.74 and 0.77 V, whereas the short-current density (Jsc) based DSSCs are significantly increased from 14.02 mA/cm2 to 16.05 mA/cm2 with the increase of NiS(NPs) to 0.3 g. | What is the value of Voc? | 50095 |
{
"text": [
"9.59%"
],
"answer_start": [
50
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.035 | The DSSC with CoPt0.1 CE yields a remarkable η of 9.59%, Jsc of 17.92mAcm−2, Voc of 0.735V, and FF of 0.728, while the DSSC with pure Pt CE (300–400μm in thickness, purchased from Dalian HepatChroma SolarTech Co., Ltd) gives a η of 6.86%, Jsc of 14.51mAcm−2, Voc of 0.715V, and FF of 0.661. | What is the value of η? | 33722 |
{
"text": [
"4.90%"
],
"answer_start": [
357
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA02474F | On the whole, the DSSC with the TiO1.1Se0.9-3/CC shows the best performance and gives the best η of 9.47%, and this DSSC is therefore used for further comparison with those cells with the Pt/CC and TiO2/CC.The DSSC with the Pt/CC exhibits an η of 7.75% with a VOC of 0.70 V, a Jsc of 16.76 mA cm−2, and a FF of 0.66; the DSSC with the TiO2/CC shows an η of 4.90% with a VOC of 0.70 V, a Jsc of 14.53 mA cm−2, and a FF of 0.48 (Table 2). | What is the value of η? | 63225 |
{
"text": [
"7.58Ω"
],
"answer_start": [
157
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.086 | For DSSCs using Pt, P25-Cu/Pt and Cu/P25-Cu/Pt as counter electrodes, the values of Rs are 18.48, 21.97 and 19.90Ω and the values of Rct are 11.60, 9.12 and 7.58Ω for the DSSCs respectively. | What is the value of Rct? | 30535 |
{
"text": [
"0.16cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
34
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.01.021 | The active area of the devices is 0.16cm2.The morphology of TNTAs were observed by a field-emission scanning electron microscope (Merlin 1530). | What is the value of active area? | 44059 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
140
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.195 | Current-density versus voltage (J-V) curves of MAPbI3 solar cells were measured using a solar simulator (Keithley 2400) with a source meter 100mWcm−2, AM 1.5G illumination. | What is the value of solar? | 4492 |
{
"text": [
"720 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC03542C | After HTM deposition and an annealing step at 150 °C to improve film morphology, devices displayed a VOC of 720 mV, JSC of 11.37 mA cm−2, FF of 0.58 and PCE of 4.78%. | What is the value of VOC? | 70954 |
{
"text": [
"76.4±3.47%"
],
"answer_start": [
100
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.087 | The pristine PSC free of QDs achieves a PCE of 6.05±0.39% (Voc=1.23±0.026V, Jsc=6.44±0.69mAcm−2, FF=76.4±3.47%). | What is the value of FF? | 6797 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.