answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"1.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
225
]
} | 10.1016/j.poly.2014.10.026 | Compounds 7 and 10 have similar π conjugated structures, however, the η value of compound 10 sensitized cell was 1.8% (Jsc= 4.4 mA cm−2, Voc= 0.56 V and ff = 0.72), which was higher than that of the dye 7 sensitized cell (η= 1.4%, Jsc= 3.5 mA cm−2, Voc= 0.54 V and ff = 0.74). | What is the value of η? | 50927 |
{
"text": [
"12"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.096 | The inset of a represents the cross-sectional image of TiO2 film with a thickness of about 12 μm. | What is TiO2? | 38312 |
{
"text": [
"glass"
],
"answer_start": [
128
]
} | 10.1039/C0CP02704A | Symmetrical thin-layer dummy cells, sandwiched with two identical platinized counter electrodes fabricated on F:SnO2 conducting glass substrates, were used for the measurement. | What is substrate? | 74178 |
{
"text": [
"52.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
175
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.004 | The S-SnO2 DSSCs fabricated from short nanorods show a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 9.49 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 352 mV, and a fill factor (FF) of 52.9%, leading to an energy conversion efficiency (η) of 1.77%. | What is the value of FF? | 36355 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
202
]
} | 10.1039/C4CP03312D | A DSC based on the CZTS II CE shows almost the same lifetime as that of a Pt CE based DSC, which is quite significant.We have successfully prepared stoichiometric CZTS film by the spray technique on an FTO coated glass substrate by carrying out the post-annealing treatment in a N2 + H2S (5%) environment for one hour. | What is substrate? | 66106 |
{
"text": [
"9.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
63
]
} | 10.1016/j.cclet.2018.05.008 | The PCE of functionalized SWCNTs-based device was increased to 9.6%, compared to 7.1% of undoped one. | What is the value of PCE? | 5494 |
{
"text": [
"6.26 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
107
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.03.024 | The Jsc of In2O3-DSSC, which is 2.97 mA/cm2 when In2O3 IOs are uses as photoanode, is enhanced to 5.32 and 6.26 mA/cm2 as Tm and Yb ions are doped into In2O3 respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 37342 |
{
"text": [
"0.50V"
],
"answer_start": [
136
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.079 | In the case of UY2, the Jsc value (6.46mAcm−2) was higher than that of UY1 under the same condition and the Voc was further improved to 0.50V, corresponding to a η of 2.28%. | What is the value of Voc? | 26701 |
{
"text": [
"10.63%"
],
"answer_start": [
30
]
} | 10.1039/C4NR03900A | Interestingly, a maximum η of 10.63% (Jsc = 24.34 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.737 V, and FF of 59.3%) in Fig. | What is the value of η? | 71417 |
{
"text": [
"8.01mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1016/j.renene.2014.12.066 | As shown in , cell N-3 has a slightly broader light absorption range than N-1, resulting in greater JSC value for cell N-3 (8.01mAcm−2 compared to 7.07mAcm−2 for cell N-1), which is probably due to the more effective conjugation of double bond in N-3 with the porphyrin core than that of benzo group in N-1. | What is the value of JSC? | 53965 |
{
"text": [
"Au"
],
"answer_start": [
83
]
} | 10.1039/C9CS00059C | For the architecture FTO/cTiO2/mTiO2-SM/Csx(MA0.17FA0.83)(1−x)Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3/HTM/Au (with FA and MA standing for formamidinium and methylammonium cations, respectively) a record efficiency of 20.5% was obtained for a non-doped HTM layer prepared with a mixture of Co(II)Por and Co(III)Por in an optimized 4:6 molar ratio. | What is FTO? | 13703 |
{
"text": [
"0.84%"
],
"answer_start": [
110
]
} | 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.03.003 | Lower short-circuit current in RGO electrode lead to low power conversion efficiency (0.26%) compared to FTO (0.84%). | What is the value of efficiency? | 30436 |
{
"text": [
"0.714 V"
],
"answer_start": [
71
]
} | 10.1039/C9NJ01970G | In the I3−/I− electrolyte, MY-102 dye shows JSC = 10.44 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.714 V and fill factor (ff) = 0.68% with an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 5.07% as compared to TA-St-CA which shows JSC = 9.44 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.673 V and fill factor (ff) = 0.67% with an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 4.26%. | What is the value of VOC? | 67329 |
{
"text": [
"2.51%"
],
"answer_start": [
162
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.09.002 | The cells sensitized with Q3 and Q4 gave Jsc of 5.36 and 7.04mAcm−2, Voc of 0.48 and 0.52V, and ff of 0.68 and 0.69, finally leading to an overall η of 1.77% and 2.51%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 54127 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.02.001 | (a) clearly illustrates 2D graphene nanosheet with good coverage over the FTO substrate. | What is substrate? | 34306 |
{
"text": [
"0.5 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
28
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA02854C | Finally, as prepared DSSCs (0.5 cm2 in active area) were tested for photovoltaic characteristics (Scheme 2).Silane coupling agent VTES can be anchored on the surface of modified graphene (mGr) via condensation reactions between –COOH, –OH and epoxy groups present on the mGr surface and silanol groups formed by the hydrolysis of alkoxysilanes in VTES. | What is the value of active area? | 77107 |
{
"text": [
"12.20 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
176
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.002 | Alternatively, it may be due to defects at the counter electrode interface, and other interfacial behavior in the fabricated solar cells (The DSSC with SRGO CE exhibits JSC of 12.20 mA/cm2, VOC of 0.72 V and FF of 0.44. | What is the value of JSC? | 55434 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
147
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.12.002 | Generally, the semicircle in this range is attributed to the charge transfer across the photoanode/dye/electrolyte interface The CNTs incorporated TiO2 nanorods (CTNRs) and branched TiO2 nanotubes (BTNTs) have been successfully prepared. | What is photoanode? | 45370 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.01.002 | Though the thickness is high, the tri-layer structure exhibits a good adhesion to the FTO substrate, due to the compact layer. | What is substrate? | 42041 |
{
"text": [
"76.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
186
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.065 | Encouragingly, the PeSCs that were based on MFGO HTL exhibited a remarkable PCE of up to 14.7%, a VOC of 1.01 V, a short-circuit current (JSC) of 19.1 mA cm-2, and a fill factor (FF) of 76.2%, as shown in , which is far higher than for both PEDOT:PSS (10.1%) and MHGO (10.5%) devices. | What is the value of FF? | 10436 |
{
"text": [
"12.93%"
],
"answer_start": [
88
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.010 | As a result, the PCE of the PSC based on F4-TCNQ doped Spiro-OMeTAD can be optimized to 12.93%, which is much higher than that of device with dopant-free Spiro-OMeTAD (6.29%) and is comparable to that of 14.32% for device with Li-TFSI and tBP doped Spiro-OMeTAD. | What is the value of PCE? | 1088 |
{
"text": [
"41.37%"
],
"answer_start": [
265
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.12.033 | The UVO treated device exhibited an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.95 V, a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 16.11 mA/cm2, a fill factor (FF) of 47.89% and a PCE of 7.52%, whereas the cell without UVO treatment showed a Voc of 0.82 V, a Jsc of 12.77 mA/cm2, an FF of 41.37% and a PCE of 4.33%. | What is the value of FF? | 6066 |
{
"text": [
"ZnO"
],
"answer_start": [
100
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.06.015 | When the dye concentration exceeded this limit, aggregation of the dye took place on the surface of ZnO nanorods which led to the self quenching phenomenon among the dye molecules and thus inhibited the charge transfer in the nanohybrid assembly. | What is ? | 48832 |
{
"text": [
"4.63%"
],
"answer_start": [
90
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM16131A | The performance is superior to the DSSC with bare gel electrolyte (JSC = 9.6 mA cm−2, η = 4.63%). | What is the value of η? | 65701 |
{
"text": [
"6.03%"
],
"answer_start": [
177
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.09.011 | For the Co0.85Se/MoSe2/MoO3 hybrid CEs, the DSSC based on the electrode-C attains a PCE of 7.10%, which is increased by 18.08% compared to the DSSC with sputtered Pt electrode (6.03%), and 10.59% compared to that with Co0.85Se CE, 16.01% compared to that with MoSe2/MoO3 CE, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 39730 |
{
"text": [
"20.07 mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
43
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143646 | QSDSC-0 exhibited a PCE of 6.805% with Jsc=20.07 mAcm−2 and Voc=0.638V. | What is the value of Jsc? | 42345 |
{
"text": [
"19.51%"
],
"answer_start": [
53
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.195 | The device with 5vol% methanol has a champion PCE of 19.51%, with a Voc of 1.112V, a Jsc of 22.32mAcm−2 and a FF of 78.61% (). | What is the value of PCE? | 4499 |
{
"text": [
"Au"
],
"answer_start": [
345
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA07497A | 4(b)) show that the lifetime of the excitons can be prolonged, which also indicates the non-radiative recombination of the perovskite films can be suppressed due to the ITA treatment.To check the influence of the corresponding PSCs for the ITA treatment, perovskite photovoltaic devices with the structure, FTO/C-TiO2/M-TiO2/MAPbI3/Spiro-OMeTAD/Au, were fabricated using an ITA and TA treatment at 100 °C. | What is FTO? | 21198 |
{
"text": [
"RGO"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.07.120 | The excellent photovoltaic properties and excellent chemical stability suggest that In2.77S4 NP-doped RGO hybrids are promising alternatives to Pt CEs for DSSCs.Supplementary data to this article can be found online at | What is CEs? | 51958 |
{
"text": [
"16.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
59
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA00362E | As a result, using D-C60 as ETM, PSC devices reached up to 16.6%, PCEs, higher than those of PC61BM based devices. | What is the value of PCE? | 19095 |
{
"text": [
"10.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
17
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | Also, the PCE of 10.2% was the highest value in the reported flexible perovskite devices. | What is the value of PCE? | 13299 |
{
"text": [
"0.944V"
],
"answer_start": [
53
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtchem.2016.12.003 | The forward scan exhibits open circuit voltage (VOC)=0.944V, short-circuit current-density (JSC)=18.27mAcm−2, and fill factor (FF)=0.42%, with η=7.24% efficiency. | What is the value of VOC? | 7959 |
{
"text": [
"0.73V"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.070 | CL-OMe showed a greater power conversion efficiency of 5.50% with a Jsc of 12.9mA/cm2, Voc of 0.73V and FF of 57.99%. | What is the value of Voc? | 38726 |
{
"text": [
"2.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
259
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA00269F | E-mail: [email protected] the past few years, lead halide perovskites have emerged as a class of dominant semiconductor materials in the photovoltaic (PV) field with an unprecedented sharp enhancement of power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) up to 22.1%, as well as in other promising optoelectronic applications due to their extraordinary and unique properties. | What is the value of PCE? | 17140 |
{
"text": [
"6.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
171
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06987H | Under a long-term aging test for 200 hours, devices based on HTM 53 showed a 43.1% reduction from their initial PCE value, while devices based on HTM 52 suffered about a 36.4% decrease in their initial PCE value. | What is the value of PCE? | 13052 |
{
"text": [
"0.29%"
],
"answer_start": [
57
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.05.283 | % H3BO3 performs the highest JSC and η of 2.67mAcm−2 and 0.29%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 43564 |
{
"text": [
"12.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
82
]
} | 10.1039/C5EE03620H | As listed in Table 1, the device with a photoactive area of 25 mm2 gives a PCE of 12.9% (Voc = 0.92 V, Jsc = 19.4 mA cm−2 and FF = 72.3%) and the PCE for the device with a photoactive area of 100 mm2 is 10.8% (Voc = 0.93 V, Jsc = 18.9 mA cm−2 and FF = 61.7%), indicating that the quality of the perovskite film does not decline with the increase in the photoactive area. | What is the value of PCE? | 17040 |
{
"text": [
"763mV"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.09.138 | Compared with other three dyes, QX12 presented a highest Voc of 763mV, a largest Jsc of 15.8mAcm−2, and finally a highest PCE of 7.64%. | What is the value of Voc? | 26377 |
{
"text": [
"6.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
37
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA05057J | In a similar manner, a higher PCE of 6.0% was reached in Device E with a Voc of 0.76 V, a Jsc of 13.8 mA cm−2, and an FF of 57%. | What is the value of PCE? | 21119 |
{
"text": [
"40 s"
],
"answer_start": [
159
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.023 | Since the deposition rate for sputtering is 0.75 Å s−1, it can be calculated that the thicknesses of Pt ultra-thin films obtained by sputtering times of 10 s, 40 s, 80 s and 120 s are approximately 7.5 Å, 30 Å, 60 Å and 90 Å, respectively. | What is the value of time? | 25120 |
{
"text": [
"65.35%"
],
"answer_start": [
218
]
} | 10.1039/C9NJ00087A | The DSSC based on S1 showed PCE of 4.39% under AM 1.5G irradiation with Voc of 708 mV, Jsc of 9.39 mA cm−2, and FF of 65.99%; the DSSC based on S2 showed PCE of 2.96% with Voc of 664 mV, Jsc of 6.80 mA cm−2, and FF of 65.35%. | What is the value of FF? | 63827 |
{
"text": [
"18.47mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
92
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.017 | According to the obtained results, the PCBM material presents the lowest current density Jsc18.47mA/cm2 compared to the other materials and lowest quantum efficiency (QE) (). | What is the value of Jsc? | 5601 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
190
]
} | 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.06.039 | The second pair redox (leftmost) corresponded to the following reactionsThe first pair of reaction is due to the redox of I2 molecules To examine the chemical stability of PANI-27 CE in the I−/I3− redox mediator, CVs of the I−/I3− redox couples on PANI-27 CE with various scan rates in an MPN-based electrolyte are illustrated in presents a linear relationship between the peak current densities and square root of the scan rate for PANI-27 CE, indicating that the reduction reaction of the I−/I3− redox couples at such CE belonged to the diffusion-controlled transport and no specific interaction between the I−/I3− redox couple and the CE In this study, we have optimized the number of sweep segment in cyclic voltammetric synthesis to electropolymerize a PANI CE with an excellent electrocatalytic activity for I−/I3− redox reaction. | What is redox couple? | 24427 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
52
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.09.024 | A set-up comprising Oriel solar simulator (AM 1.5G, 100 mW/cm2) calibrated with a silicon cell covered with KG5 filter and attached to Keithley 2400 digital source meter was used for measuring photovoltaic parameters. | What is the value of solar? | 25995 |
{
"text": [
"0.73 V"
],
"answer_start": [
69
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM35447K | Among all DSSCs, the one assembled with MWCNT@MoS2 exhibits a Voc of 0.73 V, Jsc of 13.69 mA cm−2, and FF of 0.65, thus resulting in an impressive cell efficiency of 6.45%. | What is the value of Voc? | 74533 |
{
"text": [
"0.61V"
],
"answer_start": [
255
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.06.024 | The small and large semicircles, respectively located in the high and middle frequency regions, were assigned to the charge transfer at Pt/electrolyte and TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface DSSCs based on BSF and NSF produced higher Voc values than SF (0.52V<0.61V≈0.62V), which could also be explained by the electron lifetime. | What is the value of Voc? | 32279 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
35
]
} | 10.1039/C3CE41259H | A commercially available Pt-coated FTO substrate was used as the counter electrode. | What is substrate? | 75243 |
{
"text": [
"16.2mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
131
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.10.018 | As the electron-donor transformation from stronger HOTPA to TPA, a slightly attenuated Voc (848mV), but a remarkably enhanced Jsc (16.2mAcm−2) was obtained for the device based on W03, consequently attributing to the best PCE of 9.43% amongst these dyes. | What is the value of Jsc? | 44276 |
{
"text": [
"1.123V"
],
"answer_start": [
230
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.06.031 | Owing to the excellent optoelectronic properties of perovskite films, a PCE of 22.51% (22.38%) was obtained when measured under reverse (forward) scanning, with a JSC of 24.47 (24.48) mA/cm2, FF of 82% (81.3%), and VOC of 1.122V (1.123V). | What is the value of VOC? | 11694 |
{
"text": [
"0.25cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
18
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.185 | An active area of 0.25cm2 was used to measure the cell performance.The morphology of the CuO/TiO2 nanocomposite was studied by field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) (Model TE-SCAN-MIRA3) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Zeiss-EM10C-80KV with holey carbon coated Cu grid with 300 meshes). | What is the value of active area? | 24828 |
{
"text": [
"titania"
],
"answer_start": [
98
]
} | 10.1039/B916515K | The results obtained for efficiency are in the same range as those that can be obtained using P25 titania and therefore they are promising materials as semiconductors. | What is semiconductor? | 75161 |
{
"text": [
"0.723 V"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
} | 10.1039/C7EN00179G | The highest performance at 10% produced the following parameters: VOC of 0.723 V, JSC of 14.36 mA cm−2, and a FF of 50.8% giving a PCE of 5.27%, which was better than a plain PPy CE and was comparable to a Pt CE. | What is the value of VOC? | 12753 |
{
"text": [
"62.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
170
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.07.009 | By comparison, for other samples S2.5, S5.0, S7.5, S10, the VOC were 0.89V, 0.90V, 0.93V, 0.96V, the Jsc were 16.6mAcm−2, 17.0mAcm−2, 17.5mAcm−2, 16.1mAcm−2, the FF were 62.9%, 63.3%,63.9%, 63.4% and PCE were 9.3%, 9.7%, 10.4%, 9.8%, respectively. | What is the value of FF? | 1742 |
{
"text": [
"880 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
372
]
} | 10.1016/j.partic.2012.12.005 | The low Voc observed in the device also demonstrates the poor heterojunction formed, where the charge recombination between the holes in P3HT and the injected electrons in the TiO2 is strong compared to the poor electron injection in the interface.When the BzTCA dye was included between the P3HT and the TiO2 electrode, the device exhibited Voc, Jsc, FF, and η values of 880 mV, 8.22 mA/cm2, 0.44, and 3.21%, respectively, and the device with N3 dye produced a Voc of 628 mV, a Jsc of 6.29 mA/cm2, a FF of 0.43, and an η of 1.70%. | What is the value of Voc? | 25724 |
{
"text": [
"0.723 V"
],
"answer_start": [
313
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA06917C | Under illuminating to 100 mW cm−2 solar spectrum, the uncoated solar cell had a short current density (Jsc) of 11.43 mA cm−2, open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.730 V and a fill factor (FF) of 0.693 with an efficiency (η) of 5.791%, while for the solar cells with an upconversion layer, Jsc of 12.65 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.723 V, FF of 0.729 and η of 6.661% were obtained. | What is the value of Voc? | 75708 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
377
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.09.075 | The presence of two metal ions in Zn0.76Co0.24S and CoNi2S4 CEs results in high catalytic activity which effectively regenerates the I3− ions into I− ions, retards the electron back transfer from photoelectrode and enhances the device performance.Micro/nanostructured binary (CoS, NiS and ZnS) and ternary (Zn0.76Co0.24S and CoNi2S4) metal sulfide films that directly grown on FTO substrates by in-situ reaction in hydrothermal reactor were used as counter electrodes in DSSC devices. | What is substrate? | 54949 |
{
"text": [
"14.5mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
117
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.088 | As an example, cells N11 (x6=0.4M) and N12 (x6=0M) can be considered: in the presence of GuSCN, the Jsc dropped from 14.5mAcm−2 to 11.9mAcm−2, while the FF was reduced from 0.61 to 0.54.From these results, it is clear that our chemometric approach highlights the fact that adding GuSCN to the liquid electrolyte is counterproductive to photovoltaic performance. | What is the value of Jsc? | 45321 |
{
"text": [
"790 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
111
]
} | 10.1039/C2EE23263D | The state of the art I−/I3− electrolyte E3 rendered an efficiency of 5.6% with a JSC of 11.7 mA cm−2, a VOC of 790 mV and an ff of 0.61. | What is the value of VOC? | 63779 |
{
"text": [
"8.21%"
],
"answer_start": [
194
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA01383C | We then introduced a thin layer of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) on the top electrode of the device with the highest AVT, which improves the hole collection, resulting in a high PCE of 8.21% and an excellent AVT of 24.0%.CH3NH3I (MAI) and HOOC(CH2)4NH3I (5-AVAI) were synthesized as follows: hydroiodic acid (57 wt% in aqueous solution) was put to react with methylamine (33 wt% in methanol) or 5-aminopentanoic acid with a molar ratio of 1:1 in a round-bottom flask at 0 °C for 2 h. | What is the value of PCE? | 14368 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
41
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.045 | a shows the CV curves of various CEs for I−/I3− redox couples recorded at a scan rate of 50mVs−1. | What is redox couples? | 36897 |
{
"text": [
"0.25cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
452
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.012 | GS1 and GS2 sensitizer shows the excited-state oxidation potentials at −1.89 and −1.03V vs NHE via following equation (LUMO=HOMO-E0-0) and found to be more negative in comparison to the CB of semiconducting TiO2 electrode (−0.5V vs NHE), which implies that there is an electron transfer from the LUMO of the dyes to CB of TiO2 is more feasible (The GS1 and GS2 Ru (II) sensitizers were sensitized on active nanocrystalline TiO2 film having active area 0.25cm2 and liquid redox electrolyte (I−/I3−) was used as redox mediator which is composed of 0.5M 1,2-dimethyl propyl-imidazolium iodide (DMPII), 0.05M I2 and 0.1M LiI in acetonitrile: n-butanol (1:1). | What is the value of active area? | 26250 |
{
"text": [
"12.86%"
],
"answer_start": [
199
]
} | 10.1039/C8RA08946A | In the inverted p-i-n-type of PSCs (ITO/HTM/perovskite/PCBM/BCP/Ag), JW7 shows better photovoltaic performance than JW6 and JW8 under the same conditions, leading to a PCE of 11.43% (standard PEDOT, 12.86%). | What is the value of PCE? | 19229 |
{
"text": [
"14.72mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
189
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.031 | The DSSC model based on In2.77S4 nanoflakes/graphene composite CEs has a better performance, with FF=0.66, Jsc=14.92mAcm−2, which is superior to those DSSC models with Pt CEs (FF=0.58, Jsc=14.72mAcm−2), graphene CEs (FF=0.37, Jsc=13.89mAcm−2) or In2.77S4 microsphere CEs (FF=0.28, Jsc=12.10mAcm−2). | What is the value of Jsc? | 54554 |
{
"text": [
"0.946V"
],
"answer_start": [
104
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.047 | Interestingly, an even higher PCE of 14.04% was obtained in the device using 1:1 C60: C70 with a Voc of 0.946V, a Jsc of 21.01mAcm−2, and an FF of 70.64%, which is slightly higher than that of PC61BM device prepared by the same procedure. | What is the value of Voc? | 2925 |
{
"text": [
"0.65 V"
],
"answer_start": [
131
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA07893A | This enhancement is mainly attributed to the improvement in both Jsc (from 14.95 mA cm−2 to 18.26 mA cm−2) and Voc (from 0.59 V to 0.65 V).K-60 and Y1 dyes were synthesized following reported procedures. | What is the value of Voc? | 68055 |
{
"text": [
"6.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
207
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.06.005 | The TiO2 NF control devices achieved a short-circuit current density (JSC) of 15.8mAcm−2, an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 757.9mV, fill factor (FF) of 57.7% and overall power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.7%. | What is the value of PCE? | 48854 |
{
"text": [
"14.01%"
],
"answer_start": [
131
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.040 | The best TiO2-WOx solar cells have photovoltaic parameters of Jsc=21.55mAcm−2, Voc=0.86V and FF=0.76, generating an overall PCE of 14.01%, which is only 0.25% higher than the forward-scanned value. | What is the value of PCE? | 2017 |
{
"text": [
"0.65 V"
],
"answer_start": [
194
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.10.085 | A DSSC fabricated with aligned ZnO NTs photoanode achieved high solar-to-electricity conversion efficiency of ∼2.2% with short circuit current (JSC) of 5.5 mA/cm2, open circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.65 V and fill factor (FF) of 0.61. | What is the value of VOC? | 51769 |
{
"text": [
"8.62%"
],
"answer_start": [
146
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.082 | As a result, the ACSTS cell exhibits a much higher Jsc of 18.68mAcm−2 than that of HTS cell (11.96mAcm−2), thus leading to an enhanced η of up to 8.62%. | What is the value of η? | 25757 |
{
"text": [
"8.12mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1016/j.renene.2011.07.015 | It could be seen that, for a given Voc=0.715V, Jsc=8.12mAcm−2, and η=2.2%, the current density reduces with an increase in voltage, which is in line with the expected performance from DSSCs. | What is the value of Jsc? | 23727 |
{
"text": [
"0.80 V"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1039/C2NR31379K | In addition, the DSCs based on the Ni-CNT-CNF composite CE exhibited comparable photovoltaic performance (Jsc = 15.83 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.80 V, FF = 0.63, and η = 7.96%) to those based on Pt CE (Jsc = 15.01 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.83 V, FF = 0.67, and η = 8.32%).The study at SDSU was partially supported by the NSF/EPSCoR program (Grant no. | What is the value of Voc? | 61885 |
{
"text": [
"16.38%"
],
"answer_start": [
31
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.09.057 | The MAPbI3 cell achieved about 16.38% power conversion efficient (PCE), with a short-current photocurrent (Jsc) of 21.11mA/cm2, an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.08V and a fill factor (FF) off 0.72. | What is the value of PCE? | 11466 |
{
"text": [
"1.14 V"
],
"answer_start": [
167
]
} | 10.1039/C9NR02777G | Using the NPCG method, the highest performance of planar p–i–n PSCs (ITO/PEDOT:PSS/CH3NH3PbI3/PC61BM/BCP/Ag) with a PCE of 17.14% and an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.14 V has been achieved under 100 mW cm−2 (AM 1.5G) simulated light.The materials for the perovskite precursor and transportation layer, including CH3NH3I, PbCl2 (>99.99%), PbI2 (>99.99%), PEDOT:PSS (Heraeus-Clevios PVP Al 4083), PC61BM (>99%) and BCP (>99%), were purchased from Xi'an Polymer Light Technology Corp. | What is the value of Voc? | 12671 |
{
"text": [
"15.56mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
164
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.04.003 | For comparison, control groups sensitized by AZ360 or AZ362 were fabricated, which produce PCEs of 6.60% (Jsc=14.92mAcm−2, Voc=680.1mV, and FF=0.65) and 7.00% (Jsc=15.56mAcm−2, Voc=690.1mV, and FF=0.65), respectively.Next, different molar percentages of SE (10%, 30%, and 50%) were added into AZ362 for optimizing co-sensitized conditions, and corresponding devices exhibit PCEs of 7.46% (Jsc=15.91mAcm−2, Voc=700.0mV), 7.65% (Jsc=16.24mAcm−2, Voc=720.0mV), and 7.26% (Jsc=14.97mAcm−2, Voc=688.8mV), respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 56062 |
{
"text": [
"0.552 V"
],
"answer_start": [
93
]
} | 10.1039/B906596B | Under the same conditions, the II-sensitized cell gave a Jsc value of 4.48 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.552 V and an ff of 0.68, corresponding to the η value of 1.69%.The influence of more than 20 different benzimidazole (BI) additives on the performance of a Ru complex (N719) dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cell with an I−/I3−redox electrolyte in acetonitrile was investigated. | What is the value of Voc? | 64581 |
{
"text": [
"1.118 V"
],
"answer_start": [
216
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC06297H | While V950 shows a slightly lower Voc (1.081 V) than that of Spiro-OMeTAD (1.125 V), an increased number of enamine moieties leads to the highest drift mobility value of μ0 = 5.9 × 10−5 cm2 V−1 s−1 and a higher Voc (1.118 V). | What is the value of Voc? | 20670 |
{
"text": [
"0.65 V"
],
"answer_start": [
372
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.04.009 | The overall conversion efficiency (η) of a DSSC is determined by the short circuit current density (Jsc), open circuit voltage (Voc), fill factor (FF) of the cell, and intensity of incident light (Is) The DSSCs with TPA3T3A containing the tri-anchors/acceptors showed the highest photovoltaic performance among the DSSCs tested with Jsc, Voc and FF values of 13.6 mA/cm2, 0.65 V and 0.72, respectively, giving a η value of 6.3%. | What is the value of Voc? | 28311 |
{
"text": [
"13.26mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
62
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.12.025 | As seen in the results, the Jsc increases from 12.14mAcm−2 to 13.26mAcm−2 by increasing chain length from methylpentyl (K4) to octyl (K2) for K2–K4. | What is the value of Jsc? | 52093 |
{
"text": [
"13.5 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2003.11.014 | The Jsc of the DSSC before acetic acid treatment was 8 mA/cm2 which increased largely to 13.5 mA/cm2 after acetic acid treatment. | What is the value of Jsc? | 44301 |
{
"text": [
"0.55 V"
],
"answer_start": [
0
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA13623G | 0.55 V, indicating that there was no significant effect of morphology on the Voc of the DSSCs used in this study. | What is the value of Voc? | 60418 |
{
"text": [
"17.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
186
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06718B | The power conversion efficiency (η) of each cell was 14.7% (forward scan) and 15.2% (reverse scan) for the 10:0 sample; 16.7% (forward scan) and 17.2% (reverse scan) for the 9:1 sample; 17.8% (forward scan) and 18.3% (reverse scan) for the 8:2 sample; and 15.5% (forward scan) and 15.9% (reverse scan) for the 7:3 sample. | What is the value of η? | 18357 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
137
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.02.020 | The moderate PCE obtained with the Co-based electrolytes were attributed to the low current density values due to a mismatch between the TiO2 layer morphology and the bulky complexes. | What is ? | 31441 |
{
"text": [
"0.661V"
],
"answer_start": [
39
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.026 | DSSCs fabricated using N-719 gave VOC (0.661V) and ISC (2.657mA), reports an overall PCE of 1.13%. | What is the value of VOC? | 34484 |
{
"text": [
"9.32%"
],
"answer_start": [
17
]
} | 10.1039/C8QM00337H | A maximum PCE of 9.32% is obtained for the BT-BTH based CsPbBr3 PSC and the related parameters of Jsc, Voc, and FF are 7.56 mA cm−2, 1.50 V, and 81.9%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 18773 |
{
"text": [
"0.59 V"
],
"answer_start": [
85
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.01.009 | However, the η value of WD1 is only 1.48% when CDCA is added (Jsc= 3.71 mA/cm2, Voc= 0.59 V, FF = 0.67). | What is the value of Voc? | 46863 |
{
"text": [
"3.57%"
],
"answer_start": [
165
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.05.039 | The PSSC-1 made with CH3NH3GeI3 sensitized Er3+@TNPs photoanode shows the lowest PCE and its photovoltaic parameters as follows: Voc=920mV, Jsc=6.26mA, FF=62% and η=3.57%. | What is the value of η? | 11070 |
{
"text": [
"3.9"
],
"answer_start": [
281
]
} | 10.1039/C7TC04952H | Additionally, a SnS-based thin-film solar cell with the SnS structure of cubic crystalline was reported, achieving an energy conversion efficiency of 1.28%.SnS was preferentially crystallized in the structure of the orthorhombic phase, with lattice parameters of a = 11.210 Å, b = 3.987 Å and c = 4.334 Å. | What is ? | 17785 |
{
"text": [
"578mV"
],
"answer_start": [
175
]
} | 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.12.014 | As shown, the short circuit photocurrent density (Jsc), open circuit potential (Voc), fill factor (FF) and photoelectric conversion efficiency (η) of the DSC based on ILE are 578mV, 13.59mAcm−2, 0.53 and 4.18%, respectively, which are higher than those of the QS-DSC based on IGE (Voc=541mV, Jsc=12.25mAcm−2, FF=0.51 and η=3.38%). | What is the value of Voc? | 42310 |
{
"text": [
"4.66%"
],
"answer_start": [
312
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR08350E | The first report on the fabrication of photoanodes for DSSCs by vertically aligning anatase single-crystalline TiO2 nanostructure arrays (TNAs) decorated with octahedrons with exposed {001} facets and hierarchical TiO2 nanotubes (HNTs) on Ti-foil by a two-step hydrothermal technique showed a significant PCE of 4.66% for TNAs and 5.84% for HNTs. | What is the value of PCE? | 73147 |
{
"text": [
"0.06cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.199 | All devices were measured in a light-tight sample holder with an active area of 0.06cm2 for each cell fixed using an aperture metal mask. | What is the value of active area? | 9189 |
{
"text": [
"1.02 V"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
} | 10.1039/C6CC00522E | The best performing device fabricated with L-rod scaffolds exhibited a Jsc of 19.42 mA cm−2, a Voc of 1.02 V, a FF of 0.70, and a PCE of 13.91%. | What is the value of Voc? | 14986 |
{
"text": [
"0.746 V"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.02.121 | From the results, the two cells have a similar FF, but the TiO2 MS cell has a lower Voc (0.746 V) and a higher Jsc (17.62 mA cm−2) than NP-20 cell (0.753 V and 13.82 mA cm−2), which result in a higher efficiency (9.63%). | What is the value of Voc? | 45419 |
{
"text": [
"CA-C"
],
"answer_start": [
62
]
} | 10.1039/C9NR02903F | These results support the theory that low-cost and metal-free CA-C CEs are a promising electrocatalytic material to replace the expensive Pt/FTO/glass CEs in DSSCs.This work was financially supported by the “Advanced Research Center for Green Materials Science and Technology” from The Featured Area Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (107 L9006) and the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan (MOST 107-3017-F-002-001). | What is CE? | 63626 |
{
"text": [
"glass"
],
"answer_start": [
30
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2013.01.036 | A Pt sputtered SnO2/F layered glass substrate was employed as the counter electrode. | What is substrate? | 46307 |
{
"text": [
"631 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1039/C3RA42852D | The fabricated device based on the POX-th-CN dye exhibits a short circuit current density (JSC) of 7.4 mA cm−2, an open circuit photovoltage (VOC) of 631 mV, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.32%. | What is the value of VOC? | 74646 |
{
"text": [
"7mm2"
],
"answer_start": [
234
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.093 | Finally, the film was deposited with a thin layer of Au (5nm)/Ag (100nm) by thermal evaporation under a vacuum of 10−6torr in an Edwards Auto 306 vacuum evaporation system through a shadow mask to yield ss-DSCs with an active area of 7mm2.UV–vis absorption spectra were taken by a Jasco V-670 UV–Vis spectrophotometer. | What is the value of active area? | 56688 |
{
"text": [
"7.42%"
],
"answer_start": [
249
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA07967A | The results showed that AZ261 bearing an n-hexyl chain on the π-linker generated higher Jsc (16.02 mA cm−2) and Voc (739.4 mV) than AZ6 without a substituent on the bithiophene (Jsc = 15.89 mA cm−2, Voc = 729.2 mV, PCE = 7.20%), and a higher PCE of 7.42% was obtained from AZ261. | What is the value of PCE? | 69849 |
{
"text": [
"15.65mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
142
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.09.012 | In the DSSC device containing the dye N719, the value of Jsc decreased noticeably to 8.19mAcm−2 for a single-layer TiO2 thickness of 3μm from 15.65mAcm−2 for a double-layer thickness of 14μm. | What is the value of Jsc? | 53623 |
{
"text": [
"21.3 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
48
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.05.071 | However, short circuit current density (Jsc) of 21.3 mA/cm2 and open circuit voltages (Voc) of 704 mV have been observed from the DSSC making use of PEOBNPP. | What is the value of Jsc? | 36658 |
{
"text": [
"63.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
225
]
} | 10.1016/j.cap.2011.01.004 | The open-circuit photovoltage (Voc), short-circuit photocurrent-density (Jsc), fill factor (FF), and energy conversion efficiency (η) of the standard DSSC using a as-deposited carbon counter electrode were 0.73V, 7.85mA/cm2, 63.6%, and 3.65%, respectively. | What is the value of FF? | 23612 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.