Datasets:
tcapelle
/
kaggle-toxic-annotated-filtered

Dataset card Data Studio Files Community
1
text
stringlengths
6
5k
racial_origin
int64
0
3
gender_sex
int64
0
3
religion
int64
0
3
ability
int64
0
3
violence
int64
0
3
Cleanup I did another big cleanup. Removed personal commentary and rumours and added citations. Rewrote a lot of it to make a more formal style and remove emotive language. This is my first attempt at doing this so I hope its ok. If so, how do I get the warnings etc off the page???
0
0
0
0
0
Can you offer advice on how to get the kanji?
0
0
0
0
0
Re From coupon to groupon - please don't post original essays or analysis to Wikipedia. See WP:NOR.
0
0
0
0
0
You have no friends in real life, what makes you think anyone on the internet will like you? Take the hint, you're an a-hole.
0
0
0
1
2
" There are plenty of video game articles that need assistance in some form. What the admins are looking for is proof that you want to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. Ranting about a block and not finding one article (out of millions) that needs some form of constructive editing isn't very helpful to your cause. If what you say regarding the squid is true, then here's what I'd suggest ... identify the episode number of the show that contained that information. Televisions programs can be considered reliable sources, if the show is factual in nature, such as a documentary or news program. Take that section of the squid article, which admittedly is rather short, and expand upon it, just as the admins suggested. Note the number of brains, with the source information. Locate other articles on the web showing how the intelligence of the squid has been tested, and add that. Write that section here in your talk page, making sure to use proper grammar, spelling, etc. AU93 "
0
0
0
0
0
" Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - ✰✰ echo "
0
0
0
0
1
The first THREE were rejected out of hand and the following half a dozen where similarly ditched. I could produce ANOTHER fukkin half a dozen but it that wouldn't matter to a pure PoS paid scumbag would it?
0
0
0
0
1
I smell like octopus poo and wee
0
0
0
0
0
You did not ask for an answer. The article was promotional. Just because you don't work there doesn't mean it isn't promotional. If you want, I can restore the article to your userspace so you can work on it there, but in the state you created it, it was not suitable for main article space. ~
0
0
0
0
0
umm, its rock! I no that its sourced, but dont forget and here we go again are POP ROCK. not teen pop, yes it may be sourced but from what i see you go around changing all album genres. block me from wikipedia if you wish, but i now no that its not the right place to be when im looking for a genre of an album!!!!
0
0
0
0
0
I changed the date from 1965 to 1950. The reference is a Japanese site I can't read and the only other hits on Google all appear to be wikipedia mirrors. The date 1950 has at least been published, whereas I got nothing for 1965 on GoogleBooks. I was under the impression there were few bulls even over 55-57 ft in length by the mid-1960s, let alone 60+ feet. A better reference needs to be found for the length and date though.
0
0
0
0
0
Dora also caused 260 million dollars in damage. Remember, this is 1964 dollars.
0
0
0
0
0
And, many taxonomists classify T.durum as a subspecies of T.turgidum or T.aestivum. As a last straw, some modern T.aestivum selections are higher in protein than natural T.durum!
0
0
0
0
0
Religion and teenage pregnancy There is no mention of links between religion and teenage pregnancy in the article. It is a notable emission. There is plenty of studies and data on it. (talk - contribs)
0
0
0
0
0
of Hunley). Neiln has ignored/dismissed every complaint I have made, and made no attempt whatsoever to see my POV
0
0
0
0
0
The lead is quite unbalanced, as it is supposed to be a brief summary and introduction to the main text, and yet 1/3 is about historical-cultural-religious aspects of circumcision, which only occupies a small portion of the article itself. I agree that information in the lead should be in the article under the relevant section, perhaps as the opening paragraph, but given there are already articles for religious practices, it is unnecessary in the lead. It could be reduced to one, or two short sentences that state that there have been and still are historical, cultural and religious practices that involve circumcision - but without going into detail. This is a medical article, and the use of circumcision as an initiation ritual is a different subject to medical circumcision. Only where medical circumcision has itself become part of cultural practice should there be a focus on that manifestation of circumcision as cultural practice.
0
0
1
0
0
I am not sure about the necessity, but it is an odd integer in Weierstrass' original paper, and this does at least make the proof of the properties of this function a lot easier.
0
0
0
0
0
I understand quite well how evolution is supposed to work. I understand the capriciousness and contingencies in the workings of evolution. It is the paragraph in question, especially the example in that paragraph, which distorts the workings of evolution. The phrase “it need only increase at a rate of 0.005 cm per generation (= 50 cm/10,000)” easily gives the impression of progressive linear change. The anthropocentric notions of directionality and purpose often (I assume inadvertently) find their way into the writings of specialists who attempt to explain various forms of Darwinian evolution. From these I have often read how evolution “invents” various forms and functions. Carl Sagan, in my opinion one of the worst offenders in these matters, injected anthropocentric notions on a massive scale so as to justify his idea of a million highly advanced technological civilizations in the Galaxy. I read your paragraph as suffering from the same notions of directionality.
0
0
0
0
0
You know what? Don't offend other users , you are a jerk! I know you are correct, but you don't have to get so angry about it. 207.62.246.166
0
0
0
0
1
anti-Semitic crap the whole article is an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory cherished by aryan-supremacist rightists!
3
0
3
0
2
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of rulers named Henry. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "
0
0
0
0
0
Surely he should have been created Prince of Wales just after his grandfather died on 6 February 1952? ( )
0
0
0
0
0
" Hello, firstly I don't consider this to be biting: ""rv anon user's attempt to summarise a Labour MP's blog and insert unattributed ""most consider"" statement"" I referred to you as an anon user to distinguish you from Timrollpickering who had made the previous edit. Secondly, I didn't approach you; you approached me. You reverted me twice. You referred to me as a ""conservative supporter trying to put a gloss on a terrible issue"" and said ""the new person seems to be on a pro-tory edit spree"". If you're going to call me names I'm entitled to ask who you are and it's natural that I should look at your edits. What I saw was a blatant violation of WP:NFT at Chorley and a blatant violation of WP:NPOV at Guerrilla warfare‎ and I naturally reverted. I haven't insulted you and I haven't tried to remove anything from article except what is unacceptable according to Wikipedia guidelines. (T • C) "
0
0
0
0
1
Yeah. I concur - no one has ultimate control. And still, who would know more about a band than the lead singer? If you're worried about subjectivity, just watch out for it, and edit accordingly.
0
0
0
0
0
Please note that Sorenaaryamanesh is involved in an editing war by removing unbiased primary source material intended to remove POV of article.
0
0
0
0
0
I am attending a 'career college' online (SJVC)... it certifies you first in the human resources administration and then you can opt to go further into your A.S. degree in Human Resources Administration. The school offers other types of vocations that include liberal arts for the degree program. I think it all depends now a days as to which 'college' you attend. In high school i was in an actual vocational training center, TCOVE.
0
0
0
0
0
With respect, you seem to be mistaking references found in some online media sources to usage in a whole country. Getting off the subject a little, but it does have some relevance, the NZ Herald routinely refers to NZ'ers of European descent as 'Pakeha', where as there are plenty who find this pejorative and insulating .. although this attitude is softening. Of course I would not include this in any article (and defintely not this one) without suitable reference lest it be deemed original research, I note it here as an example that the language of the media does not necessarily fully represent that of a country. What is very important to note is the skewed statistics of quoting the number of 'hits' for rooster found in NZ media. Many of these hits will be refering to the Australian league club Sydney Roosters and not the poultry. Clearly rugby is of very considerable greater interest to the country's readership than poultry. Just stating both 'Cockerel' and 'Rooster' are used is factual, whereas attempting to define relative usage is reliant on imprecise data, and data that is distorted towards an unrelated subject. Also, I can see no value to the article in trying to rank relative usage when both 'Cockerel' or 'Rooster' are common.
1
0
0
0
0
" Unfair Accusation of Spamming? Moved from my talk page Hello I feel that my addition of external links to the Wikipedia pages ""Genesis creation narrative,"" ""Ibbur,"" and ""Gilgul"" have been unfairly flagged for inappropriate activity. The external links added are primary source texts directly related to the Wikipedia page subject . They are not commercial or ideological. Please advise. Thank you Jeangohile I removed them because they linked to a blog and blogs are not considered reliable sources for Wikipedia, if you feel they are a special case you could discuss on the article talk pages. This link may be helpful links normally to be avoided All good wishes Ok I understand and thanks for responding. I still feel my external links provide important primary source texts that are not available online. Yes they are presented on a blog but there is no writing of my own presented. Please reconsider. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) "
0
0
0
0
0
Welcome to Wikipedia! Let me say that Im glad youre here but youre edits on USM story arcs are uncalled for. 111 is part of the death of a goblin.
0
0
0
0
1
" Sorry for the late reply; if you are willing to say how this works (or direct me to a tutorial of some sort), that would be helpful, but I will by no means demand it. I just noticed you and one other user were creating the images, and wanted to take part in some way. I won't be able to do anything until tomorrow afternoon (CDT), though. Thank you for taking the time to respond.  (talk) "
0
0
0
0
0
" Summary of the AfD Debate Negative Votes delete - The original editor was User:Ivygohnair so it was marked as a vanity article for violating WP:AUTO. Mapetite526 Strong Delete - Ignorance of the rules is not a valid argument for keeping an article. Vyse Neutral Positive Votes Procedural nomination. Speedy A7 was applied, but was contested and this warrants a further look. I'm neutral for now (even though this article doesn't seem to be). ColourBurst Comment/Question:CSD A7 is ""Unremarkable people, groups, companies and websites."". Is that the reason for the AfD too? According to Wikipedia:Vanity_guidelines ""As explained below, an author's conflict of interest by itself is not a basis for deletion, but lack of assertion of notability is."" Edward Wakelin It is true that I have come into the fray to defend Ivy Goh Nair from speedy deletion and that her last page was actually uploaded by me. I think if you want to apply the ""vanity"" label because one person edits the other and vice versa, it would only be fair to examine each case on its own merit. Both user:ivygohnair and user:chandrannair are established figures in the field that is being discussed: ie Singapore literature and writing; secondly, it should be considered in their favour that they have used their own names and not fictitious names as user names; If this had been the case, the problem wouldn't have arisen. Therefore I think there is much merit in User: Edward Wakelin remarks above and that an author's conflict of interest is by itself not a basis for deletion. out by Wikipedia. Chandrannair (talk • contribs) . Comment: Let's be nice to newcomers, as per Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. This seems like a case where newcomers not knowing the ""rules"" here. An author of 1 bestseller may be notable enough to get an article in an encyclopedia. Perhaps this biography needs some fixing, as per Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Deleting is probably unnecessary. PFHLai I have read her book, though I'm not from Singapore and it's better than a lot of the stuff that makes it to the NY Times best seller list. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.91.147.159 (talk • contribs). –New to all this in wikipedia... I think the mood to delete is harsh. This is a user who seems to have made a definite impact in a small place, and is trying to popularise the creative energies of Singapore. Let us be more forgiving! Besides it looks there is actual published reviews as testament to the work. Mcporpington mcporpington Sorry I meant to add to my comment above that the article should NOT be deleted! Mcporpington mcporpington Hi - I am saddened to read such biting, petty comments and suggestions about deleting this article. This person has clearly contributed to Singapore literature and has also been cited by others. signed - Phillygal27 I did my military service in Singapore and I love the country. I vote to KEEP. I do not see any conflict of interest hereJean-Louis77 Retrieved from ""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ivy_Goh_Nair"""
0
0
0
0
0
" Yes let's berate the new editor with no experience and no idea by then relegating their arguments to a version of WP:OWN. Nice to have a comment that violates OWN and CIVIL in one fell swoop while also stating ""they're on a path to nowhere"" hence showing every reference to consensus was a sham because, despite your claims of arguing with me being pointless, you have admitted to have no interest at all to bringing the article in lines with wikipedia standards because hey, it's your article. –– ''''''(Talk) "
0
0
0
0
1
Tau Epsilon Phi I see you restored the chapter information. Would you concede, at least, to removing all the external links in the left hand column? This is the big concern that we have about these chapter lists is that they often just become a directory for the links of each chapter. Would you consider adding one external link in the external link section to the chapter page on the national website which has such a directory of links? Everything else is fine, it's just the directory of links that is believed to violate WP:NOT and WP:EL. Thanks,
0
0
0
0
0
Well, unless there's anything else on your mind you want to discuss, I can't do much else around here for the next 2 days. 18:33, 16 October 2006
0
0
0
0
0
" Fair use rationale for Image:Coffee and Cigarettes movie.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Coffee and Cigarettes movie.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "
0
0
0
0
0
" AN/I About your last edits and edit summaries: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:DracoEssentialis. talk "
0
0
0
0
0
wiki is non-commercial. so it is allowed to use maps of columbia university in wikipedia as sources and evidence. i just have got a positive answer from Columbia University for using of their maps. and sool i will do that. thank you for your message.
0
0
0
0
0
I think you just did ). I was conducting my own form of social research, that is I was prodding at him trying to find out if he actually has any respect for his own stated religious beliefs or if they're just a political tool. I got my answer alright.
0
0
1
0
0
" Tossgirl as best or only? you seem to think that she is the only female pro, but you are mistaken. there are many others such as: Berry, JongMi, Navy, January, tulip, sunhee, carot, 13etty, anna, d0d0, fish, kanghuny, precious, puzzle, vitamin, y""-""o, arima, gano and others. also, if she is the only pro, why do u think they still occasionaly hold all female SC events in korea? so yes, i will change it back"
0
1
0
0
0
closedmouth is a DICK-FUCK this guy is a jackass who sux cock 4 a fuckin job y the fuck does the trans do it?????cuz its into tht kinda shit >:(
0
3
0
0
2
GOOD LORD Chase are you kidding me? Let it go, and please see your talk page! (sorry Eik, I'll be on my way again)
0
0
0
0
0
Hugh G Rection Thanks for blocking me without explanation, and then editing and locking my user talk page to make it seem as though you had done so originally. As you are fully aware, you have left me unable to even request a username change now, nor to complain about your actions. Daniel Brandt is right.
0
0
0
0
1
God, I just hate them so much. Lets hope they die.
3
0
0
0
3
" thanks for all the ideas, I've added some categories and I'll do the rest later. chyte "
0
0
0
0
0
What does this Wikiproject years mean? You invited me.
0
0
0
0
0
You won't find any creditable citations because such claim is a load of racist horse shit.
3
0
0
0
1
": Er, no, that's not how it works. We do not filter our edits to this or any other article through individual editors. If you do not like an edit, it is your prerogative to do something about it. ... speak! ... "
0
0
0
0
0
No silly it isnt ITS UR MOMS and might I say quite the lovely page indeed. Oh and UR MEAN no im just kiddding but ur not all that nice either...cause u have a black black heart.=(
2
0
0
0
1
" You have evidence from ME! I presented you with tone of evidence, but you reject it because it goes against your fictional ideas of what New England is or should be. Even eastern(southeast anyway) CT is not into this New England thing, which actually shocked me! I have told you time and again, western CT does not think of ourselves in this NE thing. Go to a town meeting and see if Boston or NE comes up. CT and it's place in the NYC metro area is what comes up. You are doing nothing but telling lies and spreading propaganda. It has to be because you dismiss my actual facts and you make too many excuses that hold no water. In my CT, there are no signs that point to New England or Boston. Our signs point to New York state and city. Also, how you people are not on this guy's ass like you are on mine? ""I bet its cause we white folk from New England hate NYC Niggers, like this spick who posted above me. Go fuck yourself.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.162.110.60 (talk • contribs)."" I can only assume because he is one of you and he at least still believe in New England with Boston as it's capital. Get your head out of your ass. Watch you block me for those comments. If I get blocked, that guy (you? should be blocked. "
3
0
0
0
2
" But getting rid of the white stolen generation but keeping the stolen generations name is extremely hypocritical. The only reason the Aboriginal stolen generation is widely used is because it is widely known. Very few people know about the white stolen generations, that doesn't mean it is less valid it just means it is less known in the mainstream public. The ""Stolen Generations"" was where Aboriginal children were taken from their families and put into foster care or adopted. The ""White Stolen Generations"" was where white children were taken from their families and put into ""slave camps"" or adopted. Now you tell me how the white stolen generations is any less valid than the Stolen Generations? They were exactly the same, why can't you accept that?"
1
0
0
0
0
Lieutenant promotion I may have missed it, but where was it stated that Renji became a lieutenant when Rukia went missing in the human world? I never remember reading that. Please source, thanks. (Talk)
0
0
0
0
0
All I do is revert vandalism. It's all there is to do, since the admins are so incompetent. If anyone worth a shit paid attention to the SPI report(s) I've made about Pe de Chinelo, you dumbasses wouldn't need to waste time with your current ANI thread.
0
0
0
0
1
Put in the ban, lets be done with it.
0
0
0
0
1
REDIRECT Talk:Red Studios Hollywood
0
0
0
0
0
Week 6 of WIKISOO Hi ! Just checking in as we head into the final week of the Writing Wikipedia Articles class. You can look through last week's ether pad notes, check out your homework assignments from Week 5, and watch last week's lecture on YouTube - all right here. Check out my note from last week (above) if you're still diving into your Final Project... or head over to the course talk page to see if anyone else is having the same issues you are! Looking forward to seeing you in the last live webinar of the session tomorrow. Big WikiLove. -
0
0
0
0
0
And by the way, please take a look at the wiki on Alex Haley, who seems to be your source.
0
0
0
0
0
Whos the douche that deleated all of the info and crap I really want to curse them out right now.
0
0
0
0
1
shared IP, see notice at top of page I cant create the subpage but i will move all the old stuff there i've removed all the odl stuff not from this month and will place it int he archive as soona s unblocked
0
0
0
0
0
" DRMIES DELETED FRANKIE STEIN FROM MONSTER HIGH!!!! DRMIES IS THE ""F"" WORD!!!"
0
0
0
0
1
" Heinlein's works, all, should have gone into post-U.S.-Copyright-protection status 14 years after his death, current statute and the rhetoric of Jack Valenti not-withstanding. As the status of ""fair use"" and such is hotly contested and heavily, and expensively, litigated, it is best to only ever use ancient myth or one's own demonstrably original and derived from Fair Use Sources. YMMV || IANYL 75.142.56.188 "
0
0
0
0
0
Mine dispeared, somebody wax my ass.
0
0
0
0
1
" Eventually, I foresee some of ACORN's self serving, spin doctored crap getting into the article if it's prefaced by ""David Lagstein, spokesman for ACORN's Detroit office, said ..."" Surely you don't want their version to go unchallenged, do you? Moncrief worked for Project Vote, a closely-intertwined, symbiotic ACORN subsidiary, for three years - as long as Obama has been a senator. Call her ""fired ACORN worker Anita Moncrief,"" put the facts into the article and let the reader decide. I'd like to review what people in my profession call ""reliability indicators."" If she gets caught lying, she faces 5 years in prison on a perjury charge. If Lagstein gets caught lying, he faces ... no consequences whatsoever. Answer my GM analogy on the article Talk page. You've been carefully avoiding it. "
0
0
0
0
1
Good job... its wackamole time
0
0
0
0
0
stop leaving stupid harping messages for peopel that are nil to do with what you are talking about
0
0
0
0
1
If you doubt that it's verifiable, you haven't read enough ED. It would be much more productive to put in the fact tags as needed, since to seasoned readers of ED, most of this stuff is obvious just by checking out the page. It's either that, or every single sentence is going to have to be referenced, and that will make for one ugly article. (talk)
0
0
0
0
0
I was going to say the same thing, but you beat me to it. It only cost like a dollar or so to read the LA Times archives.
0
0
0
0
0
" JanetteDoe, I appreciate your finding and uploading the Rao articles. However, this can easily become an endless discussion. For some other Yadav-apologist will soon come along and find an even more obscure source than Rao, and then you—conscientious and rigorous to a degree that the Yadav apologists are not and have no intention, aware or unaware, of being—will go scurrying again for the article. After that we all will try to interpret it, weighing the pros and cons, again to a degree the apologists will not, for they will be busy looking for the next roadblock to toss in our path. I think we can't make the determination of whether Rao applies here or not, at least not yet. Let the secondary sources do that. We need to rely on recent scholarship, especially that in textbooks, published by academic presses and vetted both before and after publication by reviewers from a wide range of scholarly and journalistic backgrounds. Two such books, by Susan Bayly and Christophe Jaffrelot, both widely used in universities around the world, both reviewed extensively in the literature, are being used in the article. Let the article writing (or rewriting) proceed based on these (or similar) books. Once the article has been fleshed out, we can come back to the issue of Rao. Otherwise, nothing will get done, and those of us, who've taken time out from our other Wikipedia (not to speak RL) pursuits to attend to the article, will slowly walk away, out of touch and out of sympathy. «Talk» "
1
0
0
0
0
Disagree: It's been well established that lists of characters are appropriate for wikipedia. 75.148.25.169
0
0
0
0
0
" Speedy deletion declined: Naveen Sawhney Hello MuffledThud. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Naveen Sawhney, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. UK  "
0
0
0
0
0
" hey fuck you, who the fuck checks ""Phnom Nam Lyr Wildlife Sanctuary"" for vandalism. Get a fucking life you turd bag"
0
0
0
0
2
Proxy range block, possible collateral damage, you're call See User talk:Cubbieco. Since its your block, and I am not much help with proxies myself, I'll leave it up to you... .talk.contribs
0
0
0
0
0
Pulp Fiction Would you recommend it?
0
0
0
0
0
" RSA Labss (Now EMC), MIT, and ACM are wrong? VQuaker. I am used to accepting correction when it is due, but for the life of me I cannot understand why cited information from a primary source (RSA Labs) on the fourth factor of authentication is not worth knowing. I am confronted with the information that because it is not a legal requirement as far as you know, it must be spurious. Some people know that it's better to get their legal information from government sources, not Wikipedia. If you are holding up this resource as some type of CFR or USC guide, exposition, or sanctioned resource, then I believe the U.S. Government would like to hear your ideas. Further, ""someone you know"" (or knows you) is part of network administrationwhich is part of the brilliance. Needing a cohort or supervisor to provide a human factor is difficult to defeat. Though, I suspect you know this already. I'm not offended though, just immensely confused as to why this item of access control must be devoid of technical information and meet some arbitrary legal standard. I would ask you this: if a user loses their SmartCard (i.e. CAC) and forgets their password, with the premise being that biometric devices or other inherence factor methodologies are not deployed, in most situations does an administrator with knowledge of the user ask they be terminated, or do they reissue credentials based on knowing the person? There are organizations that will terminate you, but I couldn't have said that in my expounding of the 4th factor because it would mean citing information not available to the lay. (I do hope I can ""talk"" without citing what those in DF and IS would consider common knowledge.) When we set out, it was to provide reliable information, if the mission has changed, well who could tell? Consider me a non-contributor from now onwe aren't allowed to use Wikipedia anyway where I work, it is an anathema. Say what you want unless it surprises someone and then an ego check is issued. I should expect nothing less, after all, I teach. What changed the tone was your dumbing-down and use of nonsensical examples that could not be used to authenticate someone. Smell? Non-sequitur. You gave me things to read, but I'm still waiting for you to cite Wikipedia's policy that information be legally sanctioned and in the format expected by a barrister. I cited my sourcewhere is the citation that the language style, organization, and applicability be in-line with one or more regulatory bodies? Now a better way to be proactive would be to realize that academic databases (do you have access to them [Elsevier, JSTOR, EDAS, IEEE, SpringerLink], they can be pricey if you try and yet without them you're stuck in a Google funk, but I digress) are full of references to fourth factor. That cash register key the manager uses when you return something, yep, someone you know. An that's been around for decades! Sign up for an account with an ISP, there it is again! Take joy in knowing you have some sheriff star and are for the most part helpful. I just didn't realize you alone set these standards. I repent in ashes and wrend my sackcloth accordingly. "
0
0
0
0
0
Hello Shanks. I have seen you contribute a lot in sports, especially with Greek teams and sports. Can I ask you if you support Greece in all sports? Have you followed Women's Water Polo World Championships, when Greece have won the gold medal? And how many medals do you think Greece will win in London 2012? Let me know. Thanks! 151.75.37.16
0
0
0
0
0
" $1 Note I dont know, but I have a $1 banknote and it's green in colour and has a ram on it. Anyone know what it is? I'll scan it and upload it soon. -7 "
0
0
0
0
0
June 2006 (UTC) Ermm...I actually designed and built the shopfront, are you really telling me what I was thinking when I did it? Hiding the crack was the ORIGINAL reason, not the ONLY reason. Another thing, the shopfront only 'juts out' by 6 inches in a couple places and is mainly set back from the building line by up to 4 feet! This creates the impression that it hangs out over the pavement. I will dig out a picture of the shopfront from the side if it will make you happy. Chris Ostwald, 21:40, 6
0
0
0
0
0
Arghhh; can someone sort out its location?
0
0
0
0
0
Alright, I suppose can decide whether or not they want to remove the comment. '''''' (t / c / )
0
0
0
0
0
72.94.188.92 Yo what the fuck is your problem fucking around with my page! leave it the fuck alone!
0
0
0
0
2
Hi there, how can I help you? reply
0
0
0
0
0
and more details on his various positions in the oil industry
0
0
0
0
0
MfD Missed that, thanks. Zapped. Regards, Talk
0
0
0
0
0
Some that we know would claim that as OR, but I won't. As I said, if you want GB maybe find a source that says it?
0
0
0
0
0
Tuberculosis - pages on DOTS/RNTCP == I had recently started a Wikipage on RNTCP, and only later did i realise that you had contributed a lot towards Tuberculosis previously, and that had discussed about the need for including/integrating DOTS on the wikipage Tuberculosis treatment. Now it looks odd to have a separate page for RNTCP without one for DOTS. What shall i do ? ==
0
0
0
0
0
I would say this is bad form, but the whole dispute has tired me out, and I don't really feel like intervening.
0
0
0
0
0
" February 2008 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. (speak) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices."
0
0
0
0
0
No, taekwondo is in the first sem this year (or maybe in the succeeding years) due to the placement of volleyball in the second sem. I don't know the true results of the taekwondo tournament yet. Swimming details Please be informed that rankings in the swimming championships is based on total number of points accumulated by the team, not solely on medal standings. And if possible, please include all medals. It is suggested that the table be put with these headings: Team | Points | Gold | Silver | Bronze | Total
0
0
0
0
0
Backronym? I have a feeling I read somewhere that the name TARDIS is a backronym or apronym - the name came first, and what it stood for came later. Am I right? If so, surely that should be reflected in the article. (However, I've done a quick search on Google and can't find anything that indicates this, I might be wrong.)
0
0
0
0
0
Given name Is it a female or male given name?
0
0
0
0
0
" Sockpuppetry case Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr Karl fan for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ˜ [ talk | contribs ] "
0
0
0
0
0
Rails? I question that Rails is a shared nothing architecture. By default, it has file-based sessions, as well as a single process runner which doesn't get reset between requests. If you set a global variable in one request, it'll be there in the next (assuming you end up at the same backend).
0
0
0
0
0
The second project, Wikipedians against censorship is a cynical trolling campaign lead by Gorgonzilla, a well know problem user. It would be entirely inappropriate to merge the two. Erwin
0
0
0
0
1
":::I'm against merging the articles. I think part of the confusion is that 1028 is interpreting ""African-American"" as a purely ethnic label. If it were, 1028's arguments would make sense, but it isn't. It's a label that makes reference both to a person's ethnicity and to their nationality. "
0
0
0
0
0
Thankyou, Gareth, that's very kind. Is that mound really made of loose sand, I wonder? If so, how do they stop it slumping in the rain? (The designer in me is thinking of practicalities...)
0
0
0
0
0
" 1) Organisations also count as things. 2) The section you quote from WP:NAME is in the section titled ""Use English words"", which goes on to say ""Sometimes the usual English version will differ somewhat from the local form as in Franz Josef Strauss; and rarely, as with Mount Everest, it will be completely different."" This is clearly a case where the ""usual English version"" differs somewhat. 3) Wikipedia:Naming conventions (political parties) carries several exceptions: the third exception is ""Parties whose name is more commonly known by acronyms than their full name in international newsmedia."" Since GPV is more commonly known by its acronym, this naming convention does not apply. 4) There is no problem with ambiguity, since there are no other topics in Wikipedia that carry the name GPV. Even if there were, this article would then be named GPV (political party) to disambiguate them. In conclusion: please read naming conventions in full before quoting them to me. Also, please demonstrate that GPV is not the most commonly used name in English for this party, which you have not yet done. Thank you. "
0
0
0
0
0
Tangential Forces The tangential forces (Coriolis and Euler) can be applied to a system but they don't occur naturally apart from perhaps in electromagnetism, but that is off topic. During the last week there was quite a bit of discussion going on about the Euler force and the oriolis force along with false allegations that I was confused between the two. We can apply a Coriolis force or an Euler force to a system if we like. The Euler force will increase the angular acceleration and the Coriolis force will change the direction of a constrained co-rotating radial motion. In a rotating frame of reference with non-uniform angular acceleration there will be a fictitious Euler force acting tangentially. In a Keplerian orbit, there will be zero tangential acceleration, although it is possible to see that this zero is the sum of an ongoing equal and opposite Euler force and Coriolis force. Having said all this, tangential forces are not highly relevant to this article. They could be mentioned in passing but the article is about a radial force. The centrifugal force is an outward radial force. More attempts should be made by the editors here to concentrate on differential equations in the 'radial distance' variable. They they might begin to get a feel for waht centrifugal force is all about.
0
0
0
0
0
Thank you for pointing out why you did it. More than one user uses this account and I didn't know what edits they may have done. That's why I was confused about the message on my user page. Thanks.
0
0
0
0
0
Yes you're right, theologically Catholicism is very different to American protestantism which gave birth to the creationist movement and are certainly not interested in the sort of fundamentalist theocracy that most of them want. Sure, they use the teleological argument, but phrase it in theological language which is a lot different from scientific language and hence it isn't pseudoscience, which is what irks me as a scientist. But I don't understand theology (probably because I've been trained to think too scientifically). And the Catholic Church most of the time has better things to do than make statements on scientific issues. But Catholics are really into authority, so what the hierarchy says, goes. — Dunc|☺
0
0
1
0
0
Oh GWH, you truly are the worst admin at Wikipedia. May God have mercy on your poor, pathetic, overweight, ugly soul.
0
1
1
2
2
{{unblock|WHAT THE FUCK?!?!?! The article on Anne Kilkenny was poorly written, I rewrote it so it didnt look like shit, look at my final edit you fucking dumbass.}}
0
0
0
0
2