text
stringlengths 6
5k
| racial_origin
int64 0
3
| gender_sex
int64 0
3
| religion
int64 0
3
| ability
int64 0
3
| violence
int64 0
3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"
Album genre.
While stubbornness is based on poor sources, the war will not end, just a little study, attention, touch, ""Glam Metal '', please have mercy, is not there filter, are throwing everything in a common grave without any precept!" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
It appears that you two obviously should get along well together!. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Legal Action Pending ==
I urge you to read the long history records on the Ronald Ryan article and discussion pages. There have been defamatory and false edits against Ryan and his living family menbers. We know meatpuppets are using various fake IPs to add false material and to removal of factual material. In one of many recent disgusting edits by meatpuppet/s, Ryan was accused of having sexual relations with his own daughter. In another disgusting edit Ryan was accused of being born a homosexual. Ryan is dead but his family members are alive to take legal action against these meatpuppets.
Ryan’s surviving members of his family will continue to correct the distorted, manipulated opinions and views of one book author Mike Richards, whilst all other referenced material is ignored, vandalized and removed. The scapegoat/excuse being used by these meatpuppets is wrong as it is outrageous. Members of the Ryan family are alive and well.
Supporters of Ronald Ryan will forever unite on the facts of his case and execution. We will continue to contribute the facts, based on the hundreds of references that diagree with Richards personal views. Facts like: There is no scientific evidence whatsoever to prove Ryan fired a shot.
To put it bluntly, the meatpuppets refuse to allow any contributions on the facts of the Ryan case. Their hatred for Ryan is rather sick and disturbing to say the least.
216.24.206.155
== | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Peer review
I've spent the past six weeks overhauling the hip hop dance article and now that I've finished I posted it for peer review here. I decide to invite you to review it because you've edited this page in the past and based on you contribution history you tend to edit articles that have to do with music/entertainment. I would appreciate your feedback. Be forewarned that this is a long article. Not including refs/external links, templates, and categories it's 7 pages printed. If you accept my invitation to review you may want to print it first and make your edits that way. I found it easier to read and to correct when I did this. Although long, it makes for a good read during a lunch break, a bus ride, or pure boredom. I learned a lot myself while rewriting this article. If you like to learn, this could be an incentive for you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Thank you. ) Charge! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It's completely legal to shave my head, except I will not shave my head. Yet it's also completely legal to eat lasagna, and I WILL eat lasagna. Works out to the same end. I hope we're on the same wavelength here, because following rules is awesome. Hooray for proper discussion. Now, feel free to stay away from me (and my pages)! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Give me a little bit, and I'll look into this. SWATJester Son of the Defender " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The article could definitely use some refinement, but you are basing your edits on the work of fringe authors like Peter Korrel, Mike Ashle,y and Frank Reno; none of them are reliable sources and much of what they write is spurious nonsense. Another problem with your edits is that you are padding the article with too much tangential, fluffy details that do not need to be here. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
or any historical fact concerning current Armenia pertaining Wikiprojects.
Keep your pathetic winking marks to your antiturkish ass.
Dont delete talk page entries fucking asshole. You dont have to make yourself obvious as a criminial on the loose. Are not you supposed to be pimping your mother in L.A. downtown at this time of the night normally? | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
"
Speedy deletion of ""Danny DeGuire""
A page you created, Danny DeGuire, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:
Test pages. Testing is permitted in the sandbox and in users' own user space.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
LOL
LOL. Seriously, ""BryanFromPalatine"" ? My IP resolves to Cologne, Germany, where I happen to reside. I use no sockpuppets and when I edit per IP (which I do mainly because it's faster without all the monobook CSS gadgets) whenever I remember to, I include my only active username with the signature. But please, don't let me keep you from wasting your meagre brain ressources. I just fucked my hot girlfriend for two hours (she came 5 times, me just 3 times, life is unfair), so I'm really calm as a Hindu cow. I laugh in your face, POV pushing, encyclopedia-harming moron. 78.34.129.217 (Everyme logged out) " | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Both of those are now fixed. To use the , enter nn as the prod reason. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, D.C. Employment Justice Center, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, D.C. Employment Justice Center appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. D.C. Employment Justice Center has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:D.C. Employment Justice Center and send an email with the message to ""permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org"". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:D.C. Employment Justice Center with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:D.C. Employment Justice Center.
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Weasels as pets?
http://laughingsquid.com/ozzy-the-weasel-adorably-interrupts-his-humans-video-games-by-playing-with-his-thumb/ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I think I understand your position now. And that would certainly be effective at eliminating false credentials claims. However, it also would eliminate a great many true credentials claims, and the underlying premise of the proposal is that true claims are beneficial. You may disagree with that premise, but that's a different discussion. I would like to find a way to verify pseudonymous claims, while still generally preserving privacy. I do think that's possible within reason, although probably not in an absolutely fraud-proof way. As you point out in your opening contribution, the verifiers must be trusted since not just anyone could recheck (otherwise it wouldn't be preserve privacy). That's the main design challenge remaining, in my view. Derex | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
United States
I just bought one an hour ago, and I live in the United States, meanining it is obviously sold here. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
:ActiveRain
A tag has been placed on ActiveRain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks for figuring out how to locate the images; it's a good montage, worth keeping. I think you'd have to do fancy cropping and a more creative layout than this one for the montage to get a copyright for the compilation. Could you go ahead and add the attributions etc? I will remove the speedy deletion tag first. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Unclear Statement
The use of the phrase, ""It caught on fast"" is ambiguous. Someone might want to revise the sentence, making it more clear what ""it"" is. In it's current context, ""it"" can refer to the styles of the product, or the product in general.
75.26.188.64 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Red links
The following red links have been excluded from this article and are placed here for reference.
Horses
Akarlina
Artan
Astarabad
Bal de la Rose
Caesarion
Chopastair
Darly
Dayzaan
Doctor Dino
Flanaghan Cocktail
Grand Fleuve
Great Dane
Homeland
Kadance Ville
Laverock
Lowell
Marildo
Monjal
Oumnaz
Our Account
Parme
Partipral
Pylades
Right Wing
Sign of the Wolf
Starlish
Vaguely Pleasant
Valentino
Yaka
Zibimix
Jockeys, trainers and owners
Alain Badel
Peter Baumgartner
André Ben Lassin
Gregory Benoist
François-Xavier Bertras
Xavier Betron
Miguel Blancpain
Pierre Blazy
Georges Blizniansky
Antoine Boucher
Serge Boucheron
Philippe Bruneau
Alain Chelet
Nicolas Clément
Anthony Crastus
Andrew Crichton
John Cunnington, Jr.
Berend van Dalfsen
M. Delcher Sánchez
Arthur Dewez
Jean-René Dubosc
Philippe Dumortier
Ecurie Belles Provinces
Ecurie Mister Ess A S
Jean-Bernard Eyquem
Eduardo Fierro
Aliette Forien
Greenbay Stables Ltd
Guy Guignard
Geraldine Ivoula
Norbert Jeanpierre
Alain Junk
Jean-Luc Kessas
Denis Krief
Carlos Laffon-Parias
Thierry Lemer
Jean-Michel Lorca
Daniel Malingue
Javier Martinez Salmean
Ioritz Mendizabal
Charlie Milbank
William Mongil
Marquesa de Moratalla
Paul de Moussac
Xavier Nakkachdji
Dino Nanni
François Rohaut
Martin Rölke
Jean de Roualle
Salomon Sawicka
David Smaga
Stall Brandenburg
Egon Wanke | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RantMedia discussion
Thanks, you're awesome to help with the article, but your comment might be better heard here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RantMedia. ₪— (T·C) """ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
It looks like sources 34 and 35 in the article support it. (talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
My book on pre-1939 players gives it as 1911. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No thanks, I would prefer them to remain as a tribute to your Wikipedia editing dishonor. A sort of SkepticalRaptor award, lol. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Copyright violations
Answers in Genesis does not publish Creation ex nihilo. An ""acknowledgement"" is insufficient for copyright purposes: another party owns the copyright. Answers in Genesis would need to display proof that they hold a licence to duplicate the content owned by another body. They do not do this. Further, duplicating another body's ""opinions"" do not make them the opinion of the organisation. Copyright violation is serious business on wikipedia. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Untitled
Also see: infobox vote
Codes and ""minor"" state
Please stop Since there is no definition of a ""minor"" state, there is no need to put it there. Is Algeria ""minor?"" Iran? It's a nonsense phrase, so it should be deleted. As for making ""MA"" a country code for Western Sahara, it's not. MA is a code for Morocco, and so it is in Morocco's infobox. EH was created for Western Sahara, so that is its country code. As far as the territory being occupied, this is a clear fact and the position of the United Nations; it is also mentioned in the article in other places. -❤T☮C☺M☯
It does not need a definition to be in the article. A minor state is used as opposed to super-power states, permanent members of the security council, ... etc. As to the EH domain, it clearly states the .eh tld is intended for WS but it is not assigned, "".MA"" being the one used in the territory. The same thing applies for the currency, the MAD is the currency of Morocco, but that is also the currency you will find in use in the territory. The same thing goes for the IAC 212, the Time zone +0 UTC, etc. They are the ones used in the territory. These things have been a matter of hotted debate before and they settled on the way they have been before you started tempering with them. As to your ridiculous claim of the UN considering the territory as occupied, I already explained to you the difference between a UN position through the security council that is reiterated again and again, and a voting poll in 1979 of the Algerian-Cuban drafted document, that has no obligation on the UN. The ""Zionism=Racism"" example is the brightest one for you to understand it. I will revert to the version that was in use before the anon IP started this mess.
It does Since ""minor states"" doesn't mean anything, you can't use it in this article; it's nonsense. What states that "".ma"" is being used in the territory? Do you have any evidence of this at all? The same thing does not apply to currency, since there is no administrative body that assigns currencies to regions. To ask which currency is used in a region is different than to ask which top-level domain name has been assigned to the region; the former is defined entirely by usage, the latter is defined entirely by standards. Western Sahara is clearly occupied, as the article itself still states; I'm not going through this with you again. -❤T☮C☺M☯
Ah we're back to having fun again arguing about trivialities. Minor states is indeed a value judgement - although arguably the states recognizing are largely minor on the global arena (Algeria is not a big newsmaker per se). But in the interest of neutrality, merely noting ""African, Asian, and Latin American"" states seems reasonable. At the same time, if Koavf gets to bleat on about minor, it seems reasonable that controlled be used rather than occupied. Same standards on language. ( )
Evidence on .ma usage would be found with sites for entities ostensibly domiciled in Western Sahara provinces using .ma. It is trivially easy to find that. Koavf's immature partisanship notwithstanding. ( )
What is an example of a website with an .ma domain name which has the server in Western Sahara? « D. Trebbien (talk) 23:40 2008 May 5 (UTC)
Good question. Since effectively all internet service to the Western Sahara is via Maroc Telecom or other Moroccan operators, one would expect that most servers would be located in Moroccan territory (ex-WS provinces), largely in the Casa-Rabat area. Technically I am unaware of any way to determine where the physical server is actually located (versus the service). Presumably the Regional Investment Office of Laayoune (http://www.laayouneinvest.ma/fr/index.asp) may have its server physically in Laayoune. Other similar offices may also. It strikes me as useful for the article to indicate like country code, most sites use the Moroccan address (.ma). Polisario partisans may not like that, but its effective reality. ( )
Country codes I find it reasonable th | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(Kevin and Ben are Raw!!!!) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sir,
I compel you to treat me with good faith, and to cease this path of bigotry and condemnation you currently persue. I only want us to be capable of working together, and I will not stop until you submit - either through charity or shame - to my peaceful overtures. 86.40.207.29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Warnings?
Hey there is someone else on this IP. They are vandalizing. What do I do? -66.51.147.57 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Recent? You just a pussy. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
There is some confusion over Poniatowski's status. But no confusion over his gallantry, flamboyance or wothiness as a Marshal. Besides, his inclusion would further help to illustrate the GLA's international composition, especially post 1809. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Tread carefully and be certain you read the references correctly. It's a long history crammed into a month. (Also read the exchanges between the user and who has already complained about personal attacks.) I don't usu run to mommy, even if she is on my side (or, as the case may be, in my pocket). | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Try youtube for highlights from the matches pre-08/09. There's usually various clips around from people who recorded highlights programs.
I'll check the PST stuff and deliver comment later, when I have more time to properly check it. Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
View Askew
you are right, they should go OR there should be an out of universe section. That said, Vulgar also includes a number of actors from the view askew films and is not noted. Hope that helps, or at least makes some sense. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Sure, here: No personal attacks, Don't misrepresent other people. As I said, you're entitled to your opinions, but not your own facts. Whether I'm qualified or not to make ""philosophical arguments"" is not for you to say. Nor is it for us to say who can edit what or how. There is no policy against arguing over or editing topics on which one has no knowledge whatsoever. In fact, apparently many do. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
This requires a discussion? Silly indeed. The edit you prefer mentioned a right-handed model which the left-handed Iommi played upside down. Fine. Then it jumped immediately to ""the original left-handed SG guitar"". Don't you suppose the average reader might stop and think ""What original left-handed SG guitar is being referred to""? So I restored the original text which explains it. It's one sentence for God's sake, and it serves to provide some needed context. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
in the first sentence of the article | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
LAWL. Thanks for the untrue report. You have no evidence for your claim. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Do you have become a superstar in Bangladesh?
Well this is kind of Bangladesh's superstars and models and we didn't know how Pratyya could be the model for Bangladesh as of May 2015 in the world Pratyya Ghosh seems to be a little lonely and he guesses that he wants to be an actor Are you sure to want be a supermodel in Bangladesh? I hope you have starred in 100 films. 182.191.186.120 The 182 guy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SOCK PUPPETRY? IS USING ANY ACCOUNT WHATSOEVER CONSIDERED SOCK PUPPETRY? This site is a complete joke. I can't even edit using a *verifiable* account without being accused of violating some concocted offense. My address was censored because I was using an account which was apparently improperly named, so I am now using one that IS properly named (AFTER the probation period) and that in and of itself is apparently an offense. Logically, what is going on is that I am being unable to contribute in any way whatsoever because I am being repeatedly punished for a first offense spawned from ignorance. What kind of site are you people trying to run here?!
It's no wonder the main founder of wikipedia turned his back on it when it's become such a blatant travesty of the intellectual honesty it purports to espouse. I have continuously been censored for editing a biased article- an article which is continuously edited by self-avowed marxists and anti-zionists (the very same people whose POV the article unashamedly puts forward). What kind of encyclopedia has articles that put forward opinion verified by echo chamber sources? If any editor attempted to put that sort of trash in Britannica they would be quickly disassociated with the publication- but it's quite apparent that Wikipedia has no controls whatsoever and has chosen to let the patients run the asylum. There is no use in attempting to run an objective and educational publication when the very people who have discredited the internet as a source of information are allowed to manipulate the site by sourcing the same intellectually dishonest sites that people use wikipedia to avoid.
In short, explain yourselves- particularly Roland Rance, who has manipulated his position on this site to censor any points he disagrees with- all without explaining why. When you stop accepting the ridiculous assumption that senior members are beyond reproach, perhaps the site will gain some semblance of credibility. As it stands, wikipedia is just another example persistence winning over intelligence. | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
ok ok jeez you don't need to get worked up because I made your user page so much better | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Routes
A (Rockville Route) Metro Center - Shady Grove (red)
B (Glenmont Route) Metro Center - Glenmont (red)
C (Huntington Route) Metro Center - Huntington (blue/orange-blue-blue/yellow-yellow)
D (New Carrollton Route) Metro Center - New Carrollton (blue/orange-orange)
E (Branch Avenue Route) Gallery Place - Branch Avenue (green/yellow-green)
F (Greenbelt Route) Gallery Place - Greenbelt (green/yellow-green)
G (Addison Road Route) D junction - Largo Town Center (blue)
J (Franconia-Springfield Route) C junction - Franconia-Springfield (blue)
K (Vienna Route) C junction - Vienna (orange)
L (? Route) F junction - C junction (yellow)
Any idea what H and I were to be? Dulles and Columbia Pike branches? (talk - ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
yeah we sure could use some more POV pushers from ""Loseristan"". " | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mr. Caldwell is shown here wearing a numbers tag from a State Penitentiary, so apparently he was charged with other crimes, than just the one Federal charge we are being told about here. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
99.129.112.89 (posted 9:11 AM) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
OK, my mistake, so in that case, feel free to resubmit the AFC. (talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hey, tomorrow. If tony is happy lets celebrate. Get that PC under control and we'll talk then. ( ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I was not talking about monetary fine, I meant vandalism results in blocking. I thought that according to wikipedia if well sourced info is removed for ideological reason constitutes as vandalism. I am still of the opinion, that information should be allowed freely and not be censored. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia not the promotion page of Mirza's followers. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
(whether it was gambling on mortgages, which were mostly refinancings, or on other Synthetic CDOs). So, essentially, if a vast portion of the market is basically people gambling on home equity lines of credit and refinancings, is it really accurate to just call it 'subprime crisis'? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
December 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(T | C)
Owned
(T | C) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I didn't realize discussion was required to prevent dirsuption to the enyclopedia. Thanks for the note. –xeno talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
==Reference test==
Northern Agricultural Network.http://www.muratshrine.org/bios/burns.php
==References== | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Once again.... I'm SO glad that Wikipedia is not biased or filled with retarded children. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
My hog is size 10 soft 15 with a nice Chubb chubb | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Midwest Accent
I see that you are deleting my corrections regarding the General American accent, in the article ""Midwest,"" which quite wrongly implies that General American is owned lock stock and barrel by that region. It's nonsense. The General American accent is spoken all over the north, from Seattle to Connecticut. You are going to have to come up with some citations which realistically and accurately show that the northern accent originated in or is unique to the Midwest, before I'kk allow you continue deleting my writings without a fight. It certainly is not unique to the Midwest, a region which was not even settled by English speakers until barely 150 years ago, after the northern accent was known to exist in places like Pennsylvania and upstate NY, and Connecticut. It really bugs me to see the Midwest taking ownership of an accent which began in the Northeast. The original author blunders badly by lumping the accents of certain urban areas of the northeast in with the rural areas. Anybody from my region, the Syracuse, NY area, formerly Albany, NY, knows that our accent it totally indistinguishable from that of the Midwest. I challange anybody to put a group of Midwestern speakers side-by-side with upstate New Yorkers, and tell which is which. It's impossible, it's the same accent, utterly and completely the same. And we've been speaking this way since before the Midwest was even settled, so it's nonsense to say it's a Midwest accent." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Section blanking
On the article for the TV series The Blacklist, you blanked the whole cast section. Those who read the article after that blanking didn't get more information on east cast member. Your edits appeared to be disruptive and have been reverted. The next time you remove a section of an article, as you did with the aforementioned article, you will be reported to an administrator and be blocked from editing. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
It's not possible it was!!! All this bickering because two individuals want to sweep away 8 yrs of helping and research because they they enjoy the power WP gives them through its rules! THERE OUTTA BE A RULE AGAINST RULES!!! Your humble servant! Subwayjack | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"=Reliable sources===
Cheating:
""Barry Bonds:Cheater"" from CBS, yea I kinda think that is reliable.
""Dear Barry Bonds, You are either an outright cheater or very stupid"" from the USA Today
""Yes, Barry Bonds is a cheater. He is a cheater of the worst sort""
Lying:
""It's clear, Barry Bonds' a liar"" New York Daily News, another pretty freakin' reliable source.
""Barry Lamar Bonds is a bad man"" Baseball Digest
""but Bonds is a liar, a cheater, a whiner and a bad influence on America's youth"" Mark Barnes
==" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Adoption
Hi, I'm Rosalie. You seem like a great adopter for me, so, obviously, that's why I am posting this message. I am a friendly person, and know the basics of Wikipedia but would like to learn more. Feel welcome to check out my userpage for more information about me and what I like. If you want to adopt me, please leave a message on my talkpage at User:Rosalie Hale.
Thanks,
Rosalie | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2014 (UTC)
I agree with deletion. 13:57, 17 October | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ZEST
Uh.....hello....... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ZEST
Thanks for your help !!!! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"==Apocalypse Soon: The Making of 'Citizen Toxie'==
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Apocalypse Soon: The Making of 'Citizen Toxie', suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with . " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Your pretty special you know love all you guys. and girls | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I accept your apology. Let us just prey you don't slip up again. 69.76.161.36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Probably not. All manner of duct tape is inferior to fiberglass reinforced packaging tape. It's much stronger, has superior adhesion to smooth, clean surfaces and it leaves far less residue when removed. It's also vastly superior for creating hinges or tow ropes. 70.130.37.218 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
help
Pls help me on the Hasan Sami Bolak article. User Kibele and her puppets are trying to make the article deleted as they did after a long political campaign in the Turkish wikipedia. You have enough language skills in English to tell people the facts better than me. Pls tell about their lynch campaign that they want to carry into English wikipedia. Thank you. 212.156.67.30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
YOUR ARE FUCKING GAY WAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
CUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
CUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
CUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
CUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
CUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
CUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCU | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
"
Mario Party 4 is the fourth in a series of board game style video games for Nintendo platforms, featuring popular Nintendo characters. It was released on the Nintendo GameCube in North America on October 21, 2002 strangely before the Japanese release on November 8, 2002. It was released on November 29, 2002 in Europe, being heavily criticised for being 'Nintendo's big GameCube Game' for Christmas 2002 as Metroid Prime was delayed until March 2003.
Mario Party 4 was the first Mario Party that was released on the Nintendo GameCube. Each board had its own host, including Toad, Goomba, Shy Guy, Koopa, and Boo. Mario Party 4 also contains some characters new to the franchise; Thwomp and Whomp. Klepto, Dolphin, Lakitu, and Star, along with two completely new characters named Genie of the Lamp and Ztar, are included as well. Mario Party 4 retains the Story Mode found in Mario Party 3.
The game, as usual, contains a standard party mode in which up to four players play through a board, trying to collect as many Stars as possible. The Star Space would appear randomly on the board, and players would have to reach it before anyone else. However, the Stars carry a price tag of 20 coins, and player has to earn those coins by winning minigames, which take place at the end of each turn (after all the players have rolled the Dice Block, which will always roll a number from one to ten).
Battle minigames are like the 4-player games, but generally (with many exceptions) a little more elaborate. Battle games are usually tense because every player has to put a certain number of coins (from 5 - 50) into a pot. First place gets 70% of the pot, second place gets 30%, and a random player gets any coins lost in rounding.
Every Mario Party contains 60 to 80 minigames of a few different types. Four-player games are a free-for-all in which all players compete against each other. 2-on-2 and 1-on-3 minigames put players in groups, so they have to cooperate in the minigame to win, even though they are against each other in the main game. In most situations, winners of these games make 10 coins each.
A new addition to the Mario Party series was the Bowser mini-games. Players play in a very elaborate mini-game that ends when one player is eliminated in various ways. (See Bowser mini-game section below) The loser loses a pre-specified item, usually coins or items.
Gameplay
Boards
Toad's Midway Madness
Goomba's Greedy Gala
Koopa's Seaside Soiree
Shy Guy's Jungle Jam
Boo's Haunted Bash
Bowser's Gnarly Party (Clear Story Mode to unlock it)
Spaces
There is various spaces you can land in the game. The following is a list of them, and what they do.
Blue Space - You get three coins. Also, there is a special feature on this game called Hidden Blocks, in which a star or coins may be hidden on random blue spaces.
Red Space - You lose three coins.
Green Happening Space - A special board event takes place.
Warp Space - You are sent to the same space as an opponent. A spinner chooses which opponent's space you will warp to.
Mushroom Space - Two boxes will appear (one big and one small). Choose one, and you will be given either a Mini Mushroom or a Mega Mushroom. (Note: The Mega Mushroom is not always in the large box, and the Mini Mushroom is not always in the small box.)
Battle Space - A battle minigame will start in which players put a chosen amount of coins into a pot. The better you finish in the minigame, the more coins you will get back from the pot.
Bowser Space - Bowser may steal items from players or a Bowser minigame may begin.
Fortune Space - A reversal of fortune begins, in which players may have to give coins or stars to others. The player who landed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Aaron Swartz
Stop fucking reverting my goddamn edits!!! I think Aaron Swartz is a dumb-ass, and he should have been
killed a long time ago. I know where you live; I WILL KILL YOU IF YOU REVERT ANY MORE PAGES!!!!! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
"
It sounds like the message was not intended for you. Please check out the disclaimer at the bottom of your talk page, it reads: ""This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address."" Sorry for the the confusion. (talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps for not the first time, I find myself in complete agreement with Ottava. Caulde is a young editor, and in the interests of full disclosure he and I have had run-ins in the past, over his claiming credit for work that he had not actually done. He knew better than me how to play the system. He is now an administrator, and I will never be an administrator. Go figure. I bear Caulde no ill will; he learned how to play the system and I didn't bother to take the same trouble. Maybe that's why there's a unhealthy preponderance of kiddie-admins? Fatuorum 00:44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
continued discussion
Your new edit made it seem like demographic effects were only on early settlers. We're concerned with demographic effects throughout. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
AFD
Just thought you should know Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Avatar: The Last Airbender characters (2nd nomination). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Direktor, after all that we have been through, I believe that we can clearly see Ceha's nationalist bigotry. Here it goes again. What disturbes me the most is that he is claiming this much detail. One thing is to make a map, the other thing is to make a map that has such detail like his proposed map does. But, do not worry, yesterday I figured out how to make a nice map and am currently working on it. ( ). | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tom, I understand and you don't have to convince me of the similarities, it's just that WP requires citations to reliable sources, in this case where the author of a book or a music paper article or a professional website like AllMusic has made the connection. So those examples above, though worthwhile in themselves, don't solve the 'citation needed' issue. However I'm sure I've seen the ""Mona"" / ""How Soon Is Now"" connection made in at least one book on The Smiths so let me scout around and see if I can find it. Take care and tks for stopping by to discuss. Cheers, 03:20, 20" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I'm working on it. Thanks for the tip. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
(ec with Moni) Or that using say, Dictionary of National Biography articles is ""better"" than using Oxford Dictionary of National Biography articles, because the first is free to everyone and the second is only free to UK library subscribers. Never mind the 110 year difference in scholarship (and the turgid prose and Edwardian/Victorian POV), I've seen it argued that we should use the DNB before the ODNB. It's like competence isn't required to edit, merely civility, which is so wrong on so many counts it's not even funny. I took the latest Wikipedia Foundation survey today, and found it unsettling. More questions seemed aimed at ""how close is editing WP to FB, and what would make it cooler/more social media/etc to you?"". Does no one remember we're supposed to be writing an encyclopedia??? - Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" again, a so-called ""demographic prediction"" combined with a conspiratorial context. that's always the case." | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I wish to restate the AN thread as neutral and inviting community discussion. I realize that I went to far by characterizing IH as a dick. I apologize. 140.247.141.165 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Please stop adding an endless series of pointless tags to pages I have edited. Your conduct is now effectively stalking. As soon as the tags are dealt with, you just add other ones. Thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Oops sorry. See: It is not really ""Stone Age Civilization"", it is a ""Civilization of stones"", because they left us a lot of stones (ruins) and most of their work was on stones. Plz correct what's necessary. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
talk to me, Goebbels. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
""they should know immediately what it sounds like: it has highly-distorted guitars, shrieking vocals, etc"" - but what defines black metal apart from other forms of music that ALSO use distortion and screaming? punk rock and indie may well have ideologies, but black metals different values are easily identifiable and unique. you all seem intent on giving black metal a disservice by simply labelling it as angry music. if you cared about the genre, you wouldnt. and LOL at thinking burzum has no ideology, if you are the kind of person that thinks that then you don't know enough to edit this article (the problem with 80% of wikipedia)
""To someone who is a non-listener, the fact that black metal has an uncompromising ideology is rather useless as a description"" - why? wouldn't they want to know?
also nice to see the page locked. go listen to cradle of filth you complete tits, you're all untermensch
" | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
, tending to take its cue from it once it's been establish there, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Alli Reiter) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | Talk | " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
":Totally worth it -D YO 😜
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
trunkarchive.com
Hi, Daniel. I noticed you blocked User:Trunkarchive. I suspect this user's activities formed part of a concerted promotional effort on the part of trunkarchive.com, a media-licensing company, to create bio articles on as many of the photographers in their stable as possible. Here are the other accounts, neither currently active, who may have been involved:
Photofan76's contributions consist almost entirely of creating articles about photographers represented by trunkarchive.com. Several were deleted (see User talk:PhotoFan76), but a good many have survived. Perhaps some are speediable G11 or A7. Those that are not I could conceivably bulk-nominate to AfD with the exception of any that meet WP:CREATIVE. Even those that remain should probably have the ELs to trunkarchive.com removed under WP:ELNO 5: ""Links to web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services""
I've also added trunkarchive.com to the list of proposed additions at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist
Does this seem like a reasonable course of action? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Hie DVdm. I was writing what follows while you made your edit. I can't right now, but I will coming to review in detail your example.
Thanks Johnuniq for your advice and input. Concerning the actual statement, I had already thought that after clearing things up with DVdm, I would rephrase it into something in the lines of ""He is an iconic and inspirational reference for the generation growing up in the late 1970s, early 1980s."" Adding ""to some of the generation"" should clear your objection about the absence of stats. But that's not the really important issue here. The fact is that it is ethically improper from me and from Wikipedia to declare that the (you call it blog) site is not a reliable source here, but then find that the links and statements in ""Inertia Coupling"" or ""Alexander Abian"" are significant enriching contributions to the users of Wikipedia, and the sourced site is reliable there. BTW, in these two and the few other topics the source is mentioned, the statements leading to the source links would qualify as synthesis. It would be highly objectionable from Wikipedia to keep those links unchallenged for the time being, and when someone gets around to rewriting the original material in the specific blog posts, the links will be trashed out. At this point 1) The sentence being vague and inaccurate can be corrected. 2) It seems that if you articulate a sentence validated by some sort of source that is not a direct quote, in most cases some synthesis is involved. 3) There is still the issue of the site being a reliable source. It seems to me that the Wikipedia efforts to keep the wackos with weird theories at bay, is leading editors to substitute verifiability, intelligibility and common sense by arguments of authority. This would set me going into a long winded argument about what is happening to Wikipedia, once lauded as the place ""to come as you are,"" becoming stiff, purely factual and tight in such a way that it carries a lot of knowledge but no understanding. This in turn carries into a discussion about public education, and the work that Carl Sagan is known to the general public for. Cosmos was not about this marble statue said so but instead these are the reasons why we think so. To me the posts in the disputed site I linked to are interesting (but that maybe just my own personal opinion) and Wikipedia users having them available is positive, constructive and enriching for Wikipedia, and that's the reason I linked to them in the first place. Throwing them out, all of them, seems like excluding a whole plethora of good things, the baby with the bath water, because a Wikipedia directive says so, just because it does, not noticing the directives were written to prevent bad things from happening, it would seem to me, not to exclude good things by statute. So the reliable source rules are something I would like to discuss a bit more at length. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Let's see if I can answer in an orderly fashion:
Lead
The point is that it was very much his own style, his trade mark.
Looking at the sentence now, it makes perfect sense. Please do. )
I agree. That sentence was not ""hatched"" it was ""contrived"". Will think about it, suggestions welcome!
Why not? I was just afraid that the article would be ""top heavy"" with a longer lead. I'll just put it in my notes for tomorrow, it's too late for me to think right now.
General
Learned something new here. Thanks! )
Please do. I've ""gone blind"" on the article for the moment...
Early life
My usual errors, not combining words. Please correct. )
Thanks! -Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Janurary 6, 2015
Stop posting rumors about the rapper or his label | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Why the hell did you fucking write that?! I can vandalize Wikipedia whenever I want! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
English in this article?
Is it just me or is English really pretty bad in this article? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
hello sir yunshi,
sorry,i dont know sitush account used by multiple persons.please sir,for mutharaiyar articles i gave lot of reliable sources..please undo previous day deletion... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Summaries
Sorry bout that... I'll try to remember better. Mahalo. Psst... love the smiley> | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hi Robert..hv asked the author to give a proper copyright permission..in the format as required by wikipedia. Will get it in a couple of days and send it across to the relevant authorities...Ravi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(UTC)
I think these are some very good questions, and until they are addressed by a professional, the article needs to be in dispute. Are there 60 species, or 61? Could there only be 59? These are questions of significance. 18:43, 14 November 2008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Not done: It currently reads ""at least 5.5 million"", and in the section on The Holocaust, it reads ""5.5 to six million"", with references. I'm not sure what the issue is. (talk - contribs) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hi, 牛岩, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Introduction to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.
However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.
Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything.
ترجمة |
թարգմանություն |
tərcümə |
пераклад |
অনুবাদ |
превод |
翻译 |
თარგმანი |
μετάφραση |
અનુવાદ |
תרגום |
अनुवाद |
翻訳 |
ಅನುವಾದ |
បកប្រែ |
번역 |
ການແປພາສາ |
превод |
भाषांतर करणे] |
ترجمه |
перевод |
превод |
மொழிபெயர்ப்பு |
అనువాద |
การแปล |
переклад |
dịch |
|
יבערזעצונג | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
A tag has been placed on Beezwax, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Please don't remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you've created yourself; it's considered vandalism. You can use the tag as specified. If you have any questions, leave a note on my talk page. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.