text
stringlengths 6
5k
| racial_origin
int64 0
3
| gender_sex
int64 0
3
| religion
int64 0
3
| ability
int64 0
3
| violence
int64 0
3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 (UTC)
So what? Alaska was once part of Russia. Some states in the south USA were once not part of the current union, and some were once a part of Mexico. Borders change, and yes Tibetans is a nationality within the PRC. 01:09, 2 August | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
. Finally, an entity is not notable enough for Wikipedia unless it has it's own Wikipedia page? All due respect,that is just bizarre | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This article seems to be to specific about certain political parties. I think this article should be more about the political philosophy. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
the document links are not working.
195.229.242.54 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Copied reply to Wikipedia_talk:Article_alerts#AAlertBot. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
YOU ARE ONE SAD LITTLE INDIVIDUAL. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Sorry to disapoint. I've been reading http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Pisot-VijayaraghavanConstant.html and this stuff is way over my head. I just wanted to find other things to say about 4294967297 besides its being a nonprime Fermat number. I treid to see if maybe it was being some kind of figurate number (besides 4294967297-gonal) without any luck. Then I treid putting it in by itself to sloane lookup and the Pisot seqs were the only results that didn't have to do with it's Fermatness. 22:18, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Discussion boards are almost the lowest form of life on WP:RS, only just above comments sections on blogs. However if you can demonstrate that GLF has written this (and the fact that it has appeared under his name on a forum that he has moderating rights on may indicate this - although he does not use a ""stared"" account which means it could be an imposter). The Daily Mirror account seems to be totally derivative of the Guardian, and the Guardian does not say that GLF was a member of the BNP - just that their journalist contacted him and he said that he could not be active. The Daily Mirror could well have lost the subtelty of what the Guardian said - I wouldn't like to be their libel lawyer on that!
With all of this, and knowing GLF's propensity to sue I am going to cut this out. The fact that the CDA is to the right of the Conservative Party is pretty well established in the article. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"::It's 632 words as of this moment, so there's a fair amount of room to add details. Two tricks to trim without changing content are: 1) Remove that word ""that"" when you can β a sentence will often read the same without it. 2) Change passive voice to active voice: ""The cat was pick up by John"" > ""John picked up the cat"" saves two words and makes for a more dynamic sentence. Old writers' trick. Ahem, old writers' ""technique.""
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Intro
This is the intro which was on the Palpatine page for a very long time:
Once an ambitious Senator in the Galactic Senate, the blockade of his homeworld, Naboo, by the Trade Federation, saw him become Chancellor of the Galactic Republic. Palpatine is leader of the Galactic Republic at the time of the Clone Wars, and later is the man who becomes the Emperor. Ultimately, Palpatine is revealed to be the alter ego of Darth Sidious, a Sith Lord of immense power and immeasurable cunning.
yesterday, user Robeykr changed it to this:
Once an ambitious yet unassuming Senator in the Galactic Senate, the blockade of his homeworld, Naboo, by the Trade Federation, saw him become Chancellor of the Galactic Republic shortly before the time of the Clone Wars, and later became absolute leader of the most crushing totalitarian government in the history of the galaxy. Ultimately, it was revealed that Palpatine was the alter ego of Darth Sidious, a Sith Lord of enormous power and considerable cunning.
I changed it back, and tried to clean it up a little:
Once a Senator in the Galactic Senate, the blockade of his homeworld, Naboo, by the Trade Federation, saw him become Chancellor of the Galactic Republic. Palpatine is leader of the Republic during the Clone Wars, and later becomes Galactic Emperor. Ultimately, Palpatine is revealed to be the alter ego of Darth Sidious, a Sith Lord of immense power and immeasurable cunning.
I cited the need for reversion as a) the intro needs to be short b) it should be NPOV
I would like to know what people think about the changes so that hopefully we can resolve this. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
what businessis your one someone elses page. i do recall you and fconway have done this before , so once again it is ok for you to do but no one else., also will you refrain from being a vandal on the martin anderson page. thank you.
anynmous | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Nasib Mukhtarov
17:33, 15 September 2015β (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Appreciation
Hi there ACROTERION, from Portugal,
please read | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Clifford Algebra
Hi, I have't forgotten that you wanted to discuss a bit further. I'd like that too. I'm on sort of a semi-Wiki-break right now, but, in the meanwhile, could you elaborate on
By the way, I'm interested in seeing (if you have an example in mind) an illustrative example of leveraging basis elements of a complex space that square to -1. That sounds like an interesting benefit that might normally be passed over in pure math texts.
a bit. I'm not sure exactly what you mean, and there might be no mathematical significance, but there is surely physical significance to be extracted. The complexification is made partly for convenience, partly for the Clifford algebra to actually encompass the physicist convention for the Lie algebra, and partly to encompass transformations that come from , not . Actually, not even the full suffices. In order to encompass time reversal, one must have the set of all antilinear transformations as well. These are constructed using complex conjugation and an ordinary complex linear transformation. Best! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Donnot merge this page
The single has been comfirmed:
Proof:
([url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ob9KWtc78kA[/url]) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I don't think so per the precedent set at ""originality of expression is necessary for copyright protection, and a mere photograph of an out-of-copyright two-dimensional work may not be protected under American copyright law."" Β [talk] [majestic titan] " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted because...
..because it's nominator is a follower of a that is on a crusade to smear this person. Speedily deleting this makes zero sense, as it is a real product released 12 months ago to compete on the cloud front against Amazon EC2. Surely, you understand this. Being in beta doesn't make it any less of a usable product; I merely requested that the GS team share more functionality. If you get an invite, you'll see what I mean. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wait!
It's back the information never left. I needed that deletion sign put up, for the page is clearly a page on an unimportant person. Therefore it needs to be removed. I'm not a vandal, I just need to know how to put up those deletion signs. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Sammy
I added the referenced fact the bin Laden was known as ""Sammy"" in his youth. I accept that it might seem like vandalism that the arch super villain had a semi-westernised childhood, but this is an encyclopedic fact. I believe my original edit should be reinstated. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wikipedia_talk:Censorship
A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you knidly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much.
Flaccid and erect human penis.jpg
Haha... well done for contributing. WP needs people like you to illustrate those articles P | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OK I got you the first time. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I certainly could. But in February I decided to take a step away from Wikipedia, and I am no longer editing articles on some topics, including politics. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I was thinking about this last night, and came to two conclusions: First, focusing solely on this article is not the way to go. I need to go back to square one and add academic rigor (if possible) to global warming and denialism. [Don't tell me GW is FA and is therefore academically rigorous; the FA star does not even come within discus-throwing distance of establishing an article as ""academically rigorous.""]. Second, your system of defending this Wikipedia page (notice I didn't say ""article"") is completely airtight, because you hold control over all of the definitions. Join any high school debate team and they'll tell you, if you own the definitions, you own the debate. And the problem here is this: you define anyone who disagrees with AGW as a ""denialist""; and you define everyone who agrees with you as an ""expert."" Done! The page is impregnable. Take forex the quote by Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer. Using her comments as supporting evidence of the page's (not ""article's) thesis is a flagrant act of POV that proves this page (not ""article"") is an op-ed piece from start to end. Barbara Boxer is a politician. Every bit of power, money and prestige she has comes from her ability to do one thing and thing only: to characterize herself as a noble public servant, and stereotype her opponents as villains, buffoons or both. Even more β and this is important β Barabara Boxer is not a run-of-the-mill politician. It would be nearly impossible to find someone more unwaveringly partisan than she is. In short, the Boxer quote is another bit that does not come close to passing the ""so what?"" test. I intend to delete that one sometime soon too. I also wonder whether I should give one of those damn wikicookie templates as a thank-you to the editors who revert me, every time they do so. Or maybe a barnstar? I dunno; some token of gratitude or other. β’Β " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 31, 2015
Gerda was talking with me about the image, so I checked the description, which said: ""the work of the forger Van Meergeren"". If that's true, then it's a 20th-century work, but I don't have any idea whether it's true. - Dank (push to talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
How dare you block me without cause you had no right and are abusing your position. If you don't I will demand your immediate removal as an administrator. Tannim | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Camille Paglia: sex-positive feminist
Here are the supporting links you asked for, you stupid twit!
http://www.lotl.com/content/paglia.htm
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Sex-positive_feminism
If you are too lazy and full of yourself to read them in their entirety then I will just post the relevant sections here:
Camille Paglia: ""On the other hand Iβve been saying in public for five years ago, as someone whoβs endorsed prostitutes and strippers and that whole extreme of sex-positive experience, that Iβm concerned about the effect on young people β people growing up from 8, 10, 14 in a climate where itβs gone to the opposite direction. Iβm already out there concerned about this so Iβm really outraged to be stereotyped in that way by her because I am a career teacher and yes, when you have a situation where commercialised sex is being pushed without a true eroticismβ¦Iβve been saying this for years, that we have got to a point of meaningless exhibitionism without real eroticism. Iβm for eroticism.""
Camille Paglia is a major American social critic. Paglia's academic writing focuses on the role of vibrant dangerous sexuality in human history. Paglia's key importance to sex-positive feminism is not only her writings on sex, but her advocacy of ""traditional"" values like canon texts. Paglia is somewhat of an intellectual enigma, a conservative and academic feminist, who revels in low and high culture alike and celebrates sexualities disapproved of by mainstream Western culture. Paglia has, in many ways, presented a ""respectable"" face for pro-sex feminism to the world at large." | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
August 2006 (UTC)
I'd go beyond that and strongly suggest inclusion of Figure 1 of that paper in one of these articles, as it clearly shows why the IAU definition is dynamically sound. 14:07, 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
A cup of tea for you!
This is so fun! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Source everything (i.e., citations for all information). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I support the move of 'Ade (disambiguation) β Ade' but 'Ade β Ade (disambiguation)' surely can't be right? More accurate would be 'Ade β Ade (drink)'. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Short for the spanish word ""Cohete"", which means Rocket. Defines an explosive, hyperactive and restless individual.
Born in July 16th 1980, in Guatemala City, Central America." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Talkback
Blessed be!! Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This article needs referencing, per WP:CITE. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
On Sea World
Sorry mate, we're working out the kinks in the program. Its currently in V 0.0.6rc3 . Thanks for letting me know! We'll use this information to improve it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I guess it just depends on how much service he will be doing, but you never know he could get discharged from the army, or end up coming home with post traumatic stress disorder from all the intense stuff he saw in the army. He should come back because he was like a main ingredient until he left. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
"
Not happy
I am not happy with the tone of this comment, ""You seem to be confused"".
Firstly, are you seriously saying that as ""Product Manager, VisualEditor team"" you are completely unable to give a useful answer to a question about what the plans for mathematics rendering are or what progress has been made against those plans? Does mathematics rendering really have nothing whatsoever to do with Visual Editor? Or is there some other reason why you prefer not to answer the question?
Secondly, if you wanted to be helpful, instead of airily alluding to ""the volunteers who maintain that extension"" you might have said who they are. Who are the people to whom, in your opinion, I should address that question, please?
Thirdly, if you really wanted to be helpful, and I am finding it hard to avoid the conclusion that you do not, you might even have volunteered to pass the question on to the approriate people rather than batting it back so unhelpfully.
Once again, if you engage constructively with the volunteer mathematics editor community, it is likely to prove of benefit to the project. So far I'm seeing less of a serious attempt to engage and too much petty point-scoring. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
The goal.com article is simply a reprint of the Rund article which you have already suggested three times. I have explained above why it isn't in the article. The fact that she has written a testimonial for the website of a fashion designer she likes is neither noteworthy nor encyclopedic. Again, this is something for her personal website, not an encyclopedia article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Current source
I'm not sure what you're asking about the op-amp current. - 21:39, August 6, 2005 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
listen up, you narrow-eyed teacher living on minimum wage
you can keep on doing your ""buck buck"" chicken trash talk, or perhaps you might wanna consider moving back to lemuria - the land where your kind of scum roams." | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
"
A theory is comprised of research findings. You are talking about research findings and theory as if they were two separet things??? There is no distinction between research findings and theory.
What they (first two comments) are telling is that ""the research method"" and ""the theory"" should be split into two articles. ""The research method"" is called ""Social network analysis"", and the theory is called ""Social network theory"". A researcher uses ""Social Network Analysis"" to produce information about a phenomenon called ""Social Network"" and the sum of findings constitute ""Social network theory"".
Therefore there is no distinction between ""theory"" and ""research findings"". But there should be a distinction between ""a sepecific research method"" and ""a theory"".
Thus, the article whould be split into two articles as ""Social network"" and ""Social network analysis"".
76.31.236.91 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It doesn't matter what I think. I'm a big retarded antisemite. I'm-a go throw myself in front of an sixteen-wheeler with the grill covered in razor wire and video-tape it for you. People will find the lone tripod on the side of the road, see the video, think it's lulzy, then put it on YouTube for posterity. | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Apollo 13 (film) request for editing
Could you edit the Apollo 13 film article and crop the photos of the cast, tom hanks, bill paxton, and kevin bacon. thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You should familiarize yourself with the situation before blocking editors.
Under Wikipedia policy, under the 3RR rule, it states that leeway will be given to editors whose reverts undo vandalism and/or help improve the article. There is a solution to the edit warring that has been accepted by most editors. That is to leave the 3rd paragraph of the lede as is until objections/suggestions for improvements are proposed and approved by peers before edits are made to it, which is also according to Wikipedia guidelines for resolving conflict resolution. If you familiarize yourself with this from the Talk page, you'll observe that this is a case where certain editors continually make changes without discussion, without explanation, without stating their objections first, without submitting their proposed changes to peer review, and in direct defiance of the express will of most editors that this be done to resolve the warring. I am enforcing that majority will and implementing that solution, because despite my repeated requests for moderation and intervention from administrators, I have received absolutely no help to get this taken care of. If you would kindly just enforce policy and help the majority of editors to implement the agreed-upon solution by blocking those who continually edit the article while being completely unwilling to follow policy guidelines and make a reasonable effort to seek peer approval for changes. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I'm fed up with all this and the people here. The community here is dying and now I will now indefinitely and probably forever take my place amongst those who have also withdrawn from this project on similar principles, it is nothing but needless stress and over-consumption of time | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I can accept that the picture is not a good one, but claiming that the photo should be removed because it includes a swastika - the Finnish military insignia of the time, not the Nazi symbol (which by the way is inverted, rotated and another color...and adopted two years later than the Finnish symbol) is IMHO absurd. I suggest that you read this - it might be enlightning. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sshhh, don't tell them about Vitamin K. One way of doing it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wel,l here it is Verbal. The 2005-20006 Annual Report of the Prince's School of Traditional Arts. Here is the link [] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
""Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources.[3]"" This is what you have quoted me? Unfortunately that is not helpful. I appreciate your attempts but my point that is falling on deaf ears here is this is not a matter of personal opinion. My frustration is only with individuals who believe this is a view point. I have clearly laid out why this is not a POV piece, and still not a single user has proven otherwise, assuming it is a view point simply because it is too long? Is that really a legitimate argument or is Rjensen simply offended that I have challenged the careless lack of regard for scientific knowledge.
""Giving due weight and avoiding giving undue weight means that articles should not give minority views as much of, or as detailed, a description as more widely held view"" -
I am sorry you think I am in the minority. Is the same conclusion reached by the World Health Organization, AAP, CPS, Dermatology Associations worldwide, and anyone who has actually OBJECTIVELY reviewed the literature and the tactics used by the industry. For people to say that I am in the minority, perhaps in the court of public opinion, but isn't that how propaganda works? There is not even a shred of doubt based on scientific facts that what is transpiring is propaganda, this is not even open for debate. But these people are seriously compromising the integrity of this website by acting like gods, claiming they know more about propaganda than I, based on health information and an industry that they don't fully understand. I can, by the way, generalize about the industry as it is represented by the JCTA, which is the organization I cite in the article. On what basis cna they do this, I ask all of them? And they suddenly become sensitive and cite ""WP: ..."" and claim I am the one who is personally attacking them?
~~~~" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Many thanks for checking and investigating. It is a shame there's nothing more recent. From p23 of Curatolo(2003), ""Diagnosic Criteria"", I get:
The rate of occurrence of tuberous sclerosis at birth is unknown...(paragraph continues with stats trying to come up with a figure)... This indicates that the real incidence at birth may be as high as 1:6000 (Webb et al. 1993, Cardiac rhabdomyomas and their association with tuberous sclerosis, Arch Dis Child 68:367β70)
Earlier, when talking about Hunt and Lindenbaum's 1984 study, he says ""The scientists believed that the birth prevalence might be even higher than it is now considered to be."" I don't have that paper so don't have more details.
An editorial by Fryer (Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1991, 84:699) says ""... suggesting a birth incidence of 1:10000"". I don't have the Osborne paper you mention. I've seen 1:5800 mentioned but don't know its source at present.
My sources seem to use incidence and prevalence interchangeably wrt to birth. I'm happy to change it if you think it may be less ambiguous.
The list of prevalence figures throughout the years comes from Curatolo (2003), Table 2.6, page 22. This in turn is based on an earlier table by Shepherd in his short chapter ""The Epidemiology of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex"" in the book Gomez 1999. The earlier table doesn't have the O'Callaghan figure.
I'll see if I can get hold of some of the other papers, but it isn't easy. Β°Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Because so many Turkish-people today claim to be a descendant of Oghuz Khan, male members of the Amucalar, descendants of GΓΌndΓΌz Gazi, the older brother of ""Osman I, tested their Y-DNA. Genetic history of the Turkish people, shows that the common ancestor ""ErtuΔrul"", belonged to haplogroup: R1a=6.9% - Typical of Central Asian, Caucasus, Eastern Europeans and Indo-Aryan people.
http://www.ysearch.org/search_view.asp?uid=XWBWW&viewuid;=FTEMF&p;=1
" | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hey man I'm from Wyndham Vale and it's the crime capital of Australia. It is very deadly and rapes and murders happen there reguly. My next media production is CSI Wyndham Vale. The Worlds most dangerous town! | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
"
You the man give me an example, where I betray me Jews. I think that you are just a stupid person as long as the Wikipedia stands. Hans Rosenthal (ROHA) (hans.rosenthal AT t-online.de replace AT by @ ) PS: This is for the administrators: Please deleat ""Tvoz"", ""Seewolf"", and their likes. Thanks!
" | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
":The term ""Soviet Empire"" is an informal term of criticism. It is not a precise term, it is not meant to refer to a specific period in Soviet history with a clear beginning and end. It refers to Soviet actions during the Cold War in general.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|in=Democratic Republic of the Congo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
cause thats what this is all about, not slavery and being drained of all that you are. thats why people came to America, bro. the land of the FREE. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What are the numerical parameters used in the plot? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
28, 4 July 2013 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I tried to get some more of that in the article, there is really a lot of coverage out there about this. I had a hard time finding sources that talked about the differences between moderate PT and hard-core WOF theology. I'll keep looking though. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Globus cruciger
Greetings,
I took the liberty of moving your contribution regarding the globus cruciger down to the Earth#Cultural_viewpoint section, and added the requisite reference. The lead section is intended as a high-level summary of the article; I don't think it should include content that is not covered by the article body. Thank you. β (talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
To Blanchardb
You dumb motherfucker I am going to sue the shit out of you. Watch your back. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
195.64.95.116]] 11:53, 12 October 2005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I do agree that such an idea is easily abused. My main support for it comes from the fact that all progress in this thread seems to continuously 'restart' when particular individuals revert to more primitive arguing points and essentially reinforce the same points over and over again, without any real progress. If only such postings could be ignored rather than entertained by editors interested in resolution. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fair Use
Please be specific. Which of the ten were violated? Which images were not given rationales? What changes need to be made to allow the images to stay?
Sorry, but we're all busy. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
My Bad
Sorry about that i logged in at school and said remember me so yeah umm.... sorry ill change it belive me I do not vandilise so ill fix it? -_-' so embrassing hope u understand | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I also have a massive learning disability, so please excuse me. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
BTW, just for the sake of it, would you apply the same standards of quoting secondary sources here when statements by Indian PM Modi regarding Indian involvement and support to Mukti Bahini are not being allowed to be included at Wiki? | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I am looking at your edits with a certain amount of shock that you went ahead and made major adjustments while clearly in a state of confusion which you had not even worked out in your own mind. But what is the problem you are grappling with? All you need to do when reading these articles (Underhill, Sharma, etc) is read which mutations they tested. What is so difficult about that? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Johnny Test
I don't know whether it properly belongs there or not either, but it is in the ""Teletoon original series"" template and is listed at List of Teletoon original series β so if it is in fact wrong, then those have to be corrected as well, rather than just reverting the addition of a category that both the list and the template are indicating is correct. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
. ManInStone, Sept 2007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ha... atleast you surrendered... For full Hosur history feel free to check it at http://hosur.hosur online.com/aboutHosur.asp. Again, I beg you, don't use my contents. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Really now. Something I've written on my personal user space was nominated for deletion? Great job.. (T//e/c) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Conflict of interest
I note that your username bears a close resemblance to the name of the company that you have written about at Shoestores.com. If you are affiliated with this company, you should read Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines. In general, it is not considered a good idea to write about the companies, groups, clubs, bands, etc., that we are involved with, because it is difficult to maintain the required neutrality where such things are involved. ChatMe!ReadMe!! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Some tips for making your stubs a bit better
Apart from your over-reliance on Soccerway (which isn't always a WP:RS), I've noticed there are some other aspects of your created articles which need substantial improvement. Typing ""player who plays"" is poor English, try to put ""footballer who plays..."" or ""soccer player who represents..."" The word ""currently"" is pretty pointless too - I mean, they either play for the team or they don't, right? Also, try not to say they play for Bayern Munich in the Frauen-Bundesliga. Put of the Frauen-Bundesliga instead, because they play matches for their teams outside the league too. Please remember to always put the stub tags at the bottom of the article, this will draw attention to the fact that your creations require expansion and improvement. These are just small suggestions, but hopefully by taking this advice you will get better and eventually take some steps on the path to becoming a worthwhile contributor. Thanks, " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
-βββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββββ-
Suck my dick. Thank you. Β βtalk/hist " | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Specially tailored pink shorts if I can remember correctly! A character. talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Pete, what makes you think you can go around and spread insults and personal attacks? What makes you think that you can call me ""arrogant"" and ""rude"" or kick me while I'm down? I would report you for this ongoing behavior of yours if only I wasn't blocked. But maybe someone will see my page and do just that.
Further, my ""recruiting"" of other editors is irrelevant. If you read that post of mine on Yahoo, you'd see that I told everyone that, regardless of their position, I'd appreciate their presence. I was not trying to convince other people to come over and post with my POV in mind. The fact that someone did come over and post my POV was completely beyond my control.
Finally, I did discuss these edits. I discussed them on the talk page for a week. What all four editors WERE against was not the edit I DID make, but the original proposal which was for deleting the entire section. I, however, preserved the most critical points of that paragraph and moved it to ""reception of Steiner"" to get rid of the problem of ""undue weight."" " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Yes, you are certainly predisposed to support Sanchez, regardless of what's true. It is people like you who have made Wikipedia such a joke. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Horror Society
Their editorial staff is listed on their site. '''' Michael Q.'' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Your arbitration evidence
Thank you for taking the time to present detailed evidence in the arbitration case. However, your statement right now is very long and the arbitrators have indicated they prefer shorter presentations. I would request that you try to reduce your statement to an overall length of about 1000 words. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hmm, I have feeling I just failed at that. I added the text, but ... where would I find the actual template? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks for retracting your incorrect claim that one of the two sources doesn't exist. It's always ideal to provide valid information on Wikipedia. I wonder if your emotions caused you to be overly hasty (and careless) in your attempts to come up with some excuse to disparage ANY source provided (as some of us expected you might do). So, just to summarize, I provided two newspaper sources above, both of which really do exist. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
The intro isn't of quality.. name 2 or 3 members in the intro and others later on. not almost a dozen in the beginning and the end. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I am guessing, but is ""Predatory towing"" to do with vehicles being removed as part of parking enforcement? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Cleanup
I put the {{cleanup}} tag back on the page. Please do not remove it without reading the Wikipedia:Cleanup page first. 21:04, 2004 Aug 5 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Y o g u y s
M y n a m e i s H a n a t a r a s h (www.comgem.tk)
(www.myforum.co.nr) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I don't know about others, but after this RfC is complete, I plan to take a 'year' off, from this topic. The discussions of this article's name, are becoming repetative & thus boring. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
External Links
I've added the official (Bobby G) website as an external link. I was surprised it wasn't already in there so looked through history and saw that it had been deleted on 17/11/6 (Dawnhornby); prior to that, the link to their site had always been there. So not sure if it was removed on purpose (legal?) or by mistake...
Roger. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
That is not a good reason. It was an good article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MDY dates in CentOS article
Hello there! I've just the date formatting edits, re-establishing MDY dates in CentOS article so, please allow me to explain it a bit further. Manual of Style does say that existing date formats should be kept as-is, but before I came to edit that article, ISO dates prevailed and I've changed them to DMY dates. Thus, I see no problems about moving this time to MDY dates, which, FWIW, I find to be much more readable. Of course, I'm more than open to discussing this further. βΒ Β (talkΒ |Β contribs) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Did you poop in your pants? β | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
"
Please look at the original in page 197 of this link in case my copying made stupid jokes. Let's talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It is not a good idea to try to re-start this page by blanking the disambiguation page which is rightly titled 'Michael Anthony' and put in an article about this artist. If it should be there, it should be there at MA (artist). See WP:MOSDAB if you are unsure about disambiguation pages. Do not blank this page again. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
other POV: no Earth -> no people -> no wars 68.151.34.161 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Agreed, but how would you describe it ? It is not a design, but what is it ?
When you find the answer to that question, you'll find a great way to label the image. β 11:23, 25 Jun 2012 (UTC)" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
There is no evidence that this block has anything to do with sock accounts. My use of my accounts was completely legitimate. And contrary to what Rodhullandemu is trying to imply, the only accounts that I used in the police talk page are mr3003nights and this one (which is a completely legitimate practice). I was blocked for a discussion in the talk page of the article on the policenot for editing the actual article. Please read that discussion I linked to and see it for yourself that it was pure unjustified retaliation for offering evidence Rodhullandemu could not answer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Police#Why_reiterate_.22reduce_civil_disorder.22_instead_of_protection_of_property.3F 69.228.251.134 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sorry, V, nothing personal, but I have to correct your lies. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
I think the formula is correct as it stands. You can check it out on some test data eg: loan of 1 million for 20 years @ 10% monthly. Formula gives half life as 14.34 years: near as d.. to 172 months and using Excel's PV function for the remainder (68 months) we are a tad short of half way at 499401.52. With the minus sign in we get -5.66 years - oh dear! Derivation is from a 'continuous time mortgage model' where the balance on a mortgage P(t) is given by the equation:
r=interest rate, T=time period of loan and P0 is the original loan amount. Once again this is something I have derived for myself but no doubt also once again there are more authoritative sources. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I did not say that - I am saying that you deny that the people who retaliated were 'Lebanese' even theough they carried Lebanese flags... to be consitent and not racist, I would like you to deny that the people at the beach were 'Australian' even though they carried Austrlaian flags... It is just representive of your racist flexible logic and reason were you can apply principles inconsistently in a racist fashion without noting the contradictions - please stick to the facts - I never condoned acts of violence on this thread... I merely hold your racist one-sided contradicitons to account. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Non-involved people most definitely cannot understand Yeshivish. A nice example of Yeshivish is the English Yated Neeman, which can be found online at http://chareidi.shemayisrael.com . Many of their articles simply cannot be understood by a non-Jew or a non-Orthodox Jew. That is a simple fact. It is 99% English, but those few Hebrew (and Aramaic and Yiddish) words mixed in make many articles totally unreadable for the average person. I removed the disputed tag. It has been there for months and barely anything was done about the article since, so I presumed it was safe to remove it. | (talk) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Unless third-party sources have commented on it, the BNP's 'approval or disapproval' of something doesn't belong in any article, except possibly one on the BNP itself. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.