text
stringlengths 6
5k
| racial_origin
int64 0
3
| gender_sex
int64 0
3
| religion
int64 0
3
| ability
int64 0
3
| violence
int64 0
3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
It's a little bit too revisionist for my liking (the first two batches, anyway), but I can live with it. Probably ought to have a prominent link to them somewhere, though. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
the German version
I find a quite detailed article on this topic in the German wikipedia: de:Ugly-Duckling-Theorem, but I don't understand German. So it would be great if someone could translate that one into English. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
-Anonymous Anti-Vandalism Vigilant Vigilante | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Wrong licenses
I have corrected the licenses for the majority of the images you have uploaded. The exceptions are:
:Image:Wankhede Mumbai.jpg - On the flickr page the author has apparently agreed to license the image under one of the free Creative Commons licenses, but failed to actually change the licensing.
:Image:Dhoom2.jpg - Concern that the creator is in no position to submit the image under a Creative Commons license, as it depicts a billboard for a film and copyright to it is held by somebody else than the photographer. As such, the photo may not be used on Wikipedia, except perhaps under fair use policy (which probably doesn't apply), or under panorama freedom (depending on what the copyright law of India says on this topic).
:Image:Bipasha.jpg - Image description page implies that it is licensed for non-commercial use only (contradicting your copyright tag); such a restriction is not acceptable on Wikipedia. In addition, the link to the original source (which could clarify which condition is correct) of the image is missing.
:Image:Bom.jpg - The link to the original source at flickr is missing; author uploads images to flickr as ""all rights reserved"".
:Image:Chowpatti.jpg - To verify that the image is indeed under the license you claim, the author should probably e-mail the Wikimedia Foundation and confirm that it is indeed under that license.
:Image:Hydmall.jpg - The flickr page states that it is under a Creative Commons No-Derivative license; a license that prohibits the image to be modified/used in derivative works is not acceptable on Wikipedia, either.
:Image:Infobangalore.jpg - No evidence of the image being under a free license.
:Image:Brigaderoad.jpg - Flickr page states ""all rights reserved"".
:Image:Hoogly.jpg - The link to the original source at flickr is missing; author uploads images to flickr as ""all rights reserved"".
:Image:Haf.jpg - Flickr page states ""all rights reserved"".
:Image:Bangtemp.jpg - Creative Commons No-Derivative license.
:Image:Kolkahomes.jpg - All rights reserved.
:Image:Delhimall.jpg - Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No-derivative license (unacceptable on Wikipedia).
:Image:Yamun.jpg - All rights reserved.
:Image:Kolk.jpg - All rights reserved.
:Image:Myspalbang.jpg - All rights reserved.
:Image:Bangalore.jpg - The link to the original source is missing; no evidence that it is under the Creative Commons license.
:Image:Lalbagh.jpg - Taken from WikiTravel. Uploader ought to confirm that he is indeed under the author and that he has licensed it under the license indicated.
:Image:Nagpur.JPG - Who made this image?
There are several issues here. There are multiple Creative Commons licenses, not all of which are acceptable on Wikipedia. In particular, licenses that prohibit commercial use or making of derivative works are considered unfree and can't be used on Wikipedia, except as provided by the fair use policy; Creative Commons Atrribution, and Creative Commons Atrribution Sharealike licenses are okay. Also, there are multiple versions of the licenses; Creative Commons Atrribution Sharealike 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 are all distinct licenses. (The problem is that the upload dialogue only lists the 3.0 versions and not the earlier ones; when the image is under one of the older licenses, you ought to edit the image description page and correct the number. As far as I can see, Flickr only uses the 2.0 versions of the licenses.)
In addition, some of the Flickr authors have indicated that they allow the image to be used on Wikipedia, without making it clear that they release it under one of the acceptable licenses; a permission that only extends to Wikipedia is not sufficient, either. You should ask the authors to do one of the following:
Change the Flickr page to license the image under Creative Commons Attribution (or Attribution Sharealike) license (apparently, this would change the licensing for all images, and this may not be what they intend to do);
Post a message to the image page with a text similar to the following:
I, creator of the image, agree to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution license (link) [alternately: under the Creative Commons Attribution Sharealike license (link). This declaration overrides any statement to the contrary on this page.
E-mail the Wikimedia Foundation (permissions-en[AT]wikimedia[DOT]org) with a message similar to the above, also specifying which image (images) the user intends to release under the license. (This would be the best choice if the author doesn't want to reveal his identity on Wikip | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Based on abusive edit summaries, and pages he is editing at. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Lol dumb arabs and their ""you cant show my god, heres a bomb because I have sand in my vagina!"" fucking towelheads" | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
I know, i reaslised that music videos are themselves part of the legacy, and that the music videos and racial issue's should go together as they as linked strongly. Then i thought oh what the hell, lets put critical and commerical together. I shuffled paragraphs and pictures around and now it makes sense. We can get Thriller 25 sorted today, if people will allow it to have its own page, i dont mind what you do with it here on Thriller. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SHUT UP, YOU FAT POOP, OR I WILL KICK YOUR ASS!!! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
"
I agree. Her actual usage is ""of Russia"". I will revert now to the version that we have all consented to. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
i was telled it woul.d be a single don.t merge - pzzschool | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Israeli-Palestinian conflict protect?
Yesterday there were relevent and reliably-sourced casualty figures added to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict article, and some editors objected to this. It seems you were called in to quickly ""protect"" the page from editing, effectively blocking the inclusion of the figures. You cited ""edit warring,"" the more accurate term would be repeated reverts from those who did not like the figures for political reasons. There are casualty figures in all the conflict, war, battle etc. Wiki articles I have referenced, why not this one? Thanks
RomaC, the edits which you tried to make were a set of statistics for one year only, which you attemepted to place in the first paragraph of an article describing a conflict of over sixty years. This article covers an issue of extreme sensitivity and complexity. The fact that your edits sparked so much conflict and opposition speaks for itself. Here at Wikipedia, we value the ability to achieve consensus, and to be fair to many viewpoints. And believe it or not, we often do achieve that at the article Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It is not enough to disinegnuously claim that your figures were ""reliable,"" without addressing any of the underlying issues, or any of the conflicts which it clearly and immediately caused.
To repeat: statistics for just one year of the conflict do not belong anywhere in the article's lead. there are a wide variety of figures which either side could quote, all in the name of objectivity, which would clear and unacceptably attempt to create a slant towards one side or the other. please note, this is why we are careful when making edit to be sure that we actually have consensus, rather than simply telling others that they should provide consensus.
I strongly object to your calling me ""disinegnuous"" [sic]. You wrote on the article talk page that you agreed with Hertz1888, who argued that the statistics might be biased. Do you not regard Haaretz as a reliable source? Please explain more clearly why you feel that citing reliably-sourced and up-to-date civilian casualty statistics in an article about a war, battle or conflict is disingenuous. If you or any other editor want to add more statistics, covering a longer time period, then go ahead, but do not delete relevant content added by other editors. Yes, the edit ""sparked so much conflict and opposition"" but note also also that here at Wikipedia we do not determine what is ""fair"" through intimidation by numbers. There is a big difference between consensus and false compromise.
I apologize if you felt I was offending you in any way. i only meant to describe the appearance of your edits, not to describe you personally in any way. if other editors deleted some edits, it is because they genuinely felt there was a reason to do so, and that the material was not beneficial or fair to the article. I responded to your concerns and issues further at the article talk page. thanks.
Apology accepted, and I will also make my further comments on the article talk page. I am not a single-issue editor I get around a bit on Wiki, saw the Haaretz report and very much believe it is something very relevant to the article. I can't say I know for certain why other editors deleted the material, I try to assume good faith, we'll see.
""repeated reverts from those who did not like the figures for political reasons"" - motive doesn't really matter, its still edit warring, its still disruptive. Protection is not an endorsement of the current version. Z-man
The subject of this article is a deadly conflict, the lede is huge - and yet it contains no mention of the casualties. Clearly, there is something seriously wrong. As a result, your action here, while well-intentioned, looks highly partisan. Worse than that, it looks rather like like a cynical move to protect deniers, those who wish to cover up atrocities, the mass killings of (mostly) unarmed civilians, in many cases recognised by Western sources as war-crimes. If the events at this article really offend you, it would be a lot better to lock it at the alternative version. talk 10:39, | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Catarina
I don't get that, are you joking?
| Talk to Me | 1800 ''edits!!!'
P.S. This will be the last post for a few hours, I will reply by this afternoon." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
""Surely you know how to use those."" See what I mean? Its petulant points like these that prove what I'm saying. Yes you can get your point across, but dont insult and patronize someone else in the process. (talk • cont.) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Persian
Please don't remove all references to people being Persian without any explanation / sourcing. I almost blocked you for vandalism but then decided to place this on WP:ANB/I. Please stop or at least discuss this on talk pages. グレン | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Here are the sources http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1132475697364&pagename;=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull and http://www.israelnn.com/news.php3?id=94362 but those are both just saying she was going to. I can't find anything that says she has. I was wondering if anyone else knew. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thank you very much. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thank you for experimenting with the page Oil price increases of 2004-2006 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
70.167.75.215, I've already described the ways in which your case looks bad. Arguing isn't likely to convince me, considered everything that I've seen. Also, please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~). ~~~~ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
My comments are being left up to warn others, i have no idea what an SPI is nor wish to waste any more time with you. Its clear your only purpose here is to smear the BNP since you are politically from the far left (as your own page admits). I suggest you think long and hard why you post here - as this place should only be for those are neutral on politics. | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
No matter how many times I rethink it I cannot come to the conclusion that a creamery is a goddamn cheese. Categories sre for things of the same type and a category for Northern Irish cheeses should contain articles about Northern Irish cheeses, not about cheese farms or cheese factories or cheese shops or people who make cheese. How is this possibly open to interpretation? Creameries are not cheese. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Uh oh, somebodies got internet muscles.99.235.43.93 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
What ""links/content"" on what page?
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Birmingham
Sorry if the move was a Bad Thing. I forgot to check the article's talk page and didn't realize it was quite that popular. I've added a bit to the discussion page, if you'd like to give your opinion ) tus the " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
How did you decide that bukkake always implies a female subject?
Also, just because a word has a historical meaning doesn't mean that it can't ever mean anything else as culture develops. The word rap meant ""to knock, as on a door"" up until the late 70s for example. Would you deny the more modern use of the term? The English language has no board to regulate it, as French does with the L'Académie française, so you have no basis for defining what the word means. We have groups and documents that define the proper use of words like ""you're"" and ""your"", for example, but none such for words like bukkake. If it can be shown that it is used in a particular way, that is valid. My personal belief is that there is no need for the qualifier ""gay"", just as there is no need to call men having anal sex ""gay anal sex"", but that's really irrelevent.
I think it is important to make clear the historical implications, but not to deny that we are currently creating and modifying language. Even the fact that we have taken the word bukkake, ""splash"", from Japan and created this very specific connotation of splashing not just anything, but specifically semen and specifically onto a person's face shows that this term is elastic and subject not to rules that we impose on it, but by the meaning that it has to the people who use it.
" | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Provence and Nice
hello,
The deletion of the picture of Nice of the article was cancelled... But I absolutely don't see why Nice should be part of Provence. It is part of PACA, of course, but not of Provence itself. Historicaly speaking, Nice belonged to Provence during the Middle Age, however, Istanbul was still Byzantine Constantinople more recently, and on an article of Greece, no one will put a picture of Istanbul... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It may seem trivial but your consistent refusal to use ~~~~ to sign your comments suggests to me that you in fact have no desire to join the Church of Wikipedia - you merely wish to push one article through. I see no evidence of your resubmitting the article - did you save it? Did you check for it after saving? — RHaworth | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please avoid entering disagreements which were started by vandals
This user has a history of vandalizing references in articles. It took another user to tell him to stop removing cited material from a page, and using those links to float above his modification, though those links didn't back up his statement. This is the definition of a vandal. If you read his talk history, you will see disagreements with other users, where he removes cited material to impose his own uncited views 142.59.249.84 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
>
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Yep, the FPOC looks good ) I may be around at 07:00 BST (which, I understand, is evening here) - just ping me on here and see if I respond. I'll have a look-in at your editor review after I think up a couple of questions to ask, which I'll be interested to hear your responses to. Cheers, '''''' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It also said Porto's official website said the move was official. It is not a primary source. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dear editor,
kindly ask user abhishek to refrain from edit warring and vandalism, SP balsubrahmanya is from andhra pradesh and has significantly contributed to telugu film industry when compared to others, he has sung the maximum number of songs in Telugu.
( ). | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I hope others are around ( | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
personally I reckon this pretty much answered my original question. Jimbo and I feel it's not a good fit for a userpage, Jimbo suggests continuing to think about it - I agree. I've cheekily collapsed durova's comments about me above, per her request, because really they're a much better fit on my talk page, not this one. Everyone is, as ever, most welcome.... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
articles for deletion
Hi Orderinchaos, do you think it would be appropriate for me to add ""
{{subst:prod|Not notable enough to have sufficient neutral references from which to source information to make an article, suggest moving current content to another wiki (eg. [http://australia.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page Australia wiki])}}
"" to the following pages:
Grassroots Left
Australian Liberal Students' Federation
Independents (Australian NUS faction)
National Labor Students
National Liaison Committee
Socialist Alternative (Australia)
Student Unity
Australian Labor Students
Left Alliance (Australia)
Love and Rage (Australia)
National Broad Left
National Organisation of Labor Students
Non-Aligned Left
Small + Regionals
? Thanks, -(answering machine) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"==Recent Vandalism==
Look at the page history for the guy that keeps writing ""!!!!!!!!!!LINKIN PARK RULZ!!!!!!!!!!"" He's changed the first section to that repeatedly, no matter how many times we reverted it.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
can't seem to be bothered with actual fact. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Please do NOT delete my posts without explanation or warning
I notice that your user page has a tag that says ""This user prefers discussing changes on the talkpage rather than engaging in an edit war."" Evidently, this is a lie. 122.60.93.162 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
The only vandals are pathetic wiki administrators as encyclopediadramatica.com says right! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Regarding edits made during December 2 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Bendigo South East Secondary College page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make the edit(s) to which this warning refers. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
") (As well as Strom, ""Mr. Solid South"", himself," | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You made the second M in MacManus a small m, that is not how his name is written, can you please explain why you did this? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BTW the article looks good for now as most of the information from the anti-Jonathan sources are quite factual, but this heads-up is needed in anticipation of future BLP un-compliant additions. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Re: Sorry
Not your fault, no need to apologize. I do appericate you letting me know. I am not sure how I will let things be heard from now on but we will cross that bridge when we get there. Again, no worries. Take Care.... T:C " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
So far, I have these sources that I will use for William Kaye Estes's and his contribution to education.
Bush, R. R., & Estes, W. K. (1959). Studies in mathematical learning theory (Vol. 3). Stanford University Press.
dainaloo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Calling someone a consistent hypocrite is a personal attack, pointing out a specific and relevant act of hypocrisy is not. Some of the same 'contributors' accusing the journal articles associated with Go! as being of insufficient note were the same voting to keep the Go article in the absence of any such third party mention beyond 'news'y blog mentions. That is hypocrisy. Pointing it out, however exasperatedly, is not a personal attack. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Stop.
Stop redirecting the Teddygodzilla page to List of Code Lyoko episodes. Clearly, I'm in the middle of working on it. What you need is patience, man. And don't give me something like ""YOU HAD ENOUGH TIME"". How do you know I haven't been busy? What If I had to evacuate Hurricane Ike? As a matter of fact, My laptop charger decided to get fried, and I have a very small amount of time on a computer now. So my advice to you is to show some patience, or you will find me being a major asshole towards you. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
REDIRECT Talk:George Washington Carver Senior High School | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Catwoman reference material
T-man, looks like you have found some good reference materials to add to Catwoman. I encourage you to implement some of that information there... perhaps providing that level of detail in Enemies of Batman is not the best idea. (See how friendly I am being to you?) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
FA article
Please refrain from repeatedly adding the unsourced assertion that you are the only legal IP holder to Firearms. Not only is it incorrect, it is against our policies on no original research, verifiability, and conflict of interest. You've been warned before about it, further insertion of the material will result in blocks.SWATJester Son of the Defender " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Always good to have the ignorant and mentally defective getting together. Die soon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
"
Crimea/Ukraine articles
Hi HJ. In the message you left on my talk page (here), you explained your reasoning for not protecting the relevant articles. As my response there indicates I don't share your opinion, but I understand where you're coming from. In that comment you also said ""I'd really like to avoid protecting them for the duration if that can be avoided, but if you keep bringing issues to my attention, I'll do my utmost to make your life easier"". So this is the ""bring the issues to your attention"" on my part. See this 3RR request filed by User:Kudzu1. It's sort of gone past ""lots of disruptive anon IPs"" causing trouble on these pages, to pretty much full blown sock puppetry and abuse of multiple accounts by at least - though likely, more - one person. So. How can my life be made easier? SPI? I already filed one, on one sock master (though that's probably a different person) and some other users have filed others (for example ). The problem is - and notice that a CU has not even gotten around to the SPI I filed - that by the time the CUs get around to considering these cases, the person(s) behind these accounts have already thrown them away and moved onto new SPAs which keep doing the same thing. Not sure what the best course of action here is but it's helluva frustrating trying to deal with this. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
I understood it to be a term of art, not a literal enunciation of a belief that a disembodied deity had possessed the bodies of humans in eastern Virginia at the polling booth. Such a notion would be inconsistent with Brat's free will theology and none of the RS that includes this quote have indicated he meant it as anything more than a literary flourish. If they were unambiguous he intended to communicate he was in contact with God or some other super-being then we'd have something. But they didn't. Right now we're making a scrapbook, rather than an encyclopedia article. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
"
To add, The Belfast Telegraph (6 April 2012) states: ""After leaving Banbridge, Lewthwaite moved back to England, where she was born, along with her Ulster mother Christine and father Andrew, who had served as a soldier."" Sorbet " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I just went to the user page and cannot find this icon, nor is the connotation {Reviewer topicon} anywhere in my writing. What are you seeing that I am not? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks, that's nice of you to say. Good luck to you too. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
No! This is a GROUP EFFORT! Wikipedia is a collaborative COMMUNITY and there are no school essays here. The article needs to be more professional and adopt a better title besides the references. This is all that needs to be done, so get off your high horse and accomplish what you want to see done. If you have these goals, then put yourself to the test of solving this problem. That's what I do whenever something perturbs me. You're just looking for a fight about something you admittedly care nothing about. How about I come by your house and criticise your gardens? ""Why?"" You say. ""Because they are too fucking ugly and I don't like the way they don't blend in with the neighbours' yards. So tacky, but I'm only passing by and I've never been down this road before."" 15:24, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
"
I am not asking for unblock - but can someone clarify is my block forever? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please see the RM at Talk:Stawamus (village)#Requested move, and I could list a few RMs and CfDs about Squamish titles also i.e. Squamish BC vs Squamish people/Skwxwu7mesh likewise but for now, unfortunately, that's a DEADHORSE because of all the people not really familiar with either and not in a position to know what the PRIMARYTOPIC is, or just hostile to native names altogether. All were substantially authored as well as titled by | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Where the Hell is Kisame's Section?
Well? and dont bother telling me to sign my post, cuz i cant figure out how | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Wow, you really are taking this very personally. Calm down. Also, do you realize how racist your above comment is? Japanese are no more inherently docile than any other race. That you would suggest so genuinely offends me. 99.231.241.146 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
M!ssundaztood
Your recent contribution(s) to are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Regarding edits made during September 27 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this IP address is shared by multiple users and you have not made any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
V6FS Max Size
This may sound random, but Wikipedia led me astray on my home work and I should try to prevent it for others. The given max size in:
""The actual maximum was 8,847,360 bytes, with 7 singly-indirect blocks and 1 doubly-indirect block; PWB/UNIX 1.0's variant had 8 singly-indirect blocks, making the maximum 524,288 bytes or half a MiB.""
is incorrect.
According to the Version 6 Manual, http://wwwlehre.dhbw-stuttgart.de/~helbig/os/v6/doc/V/fs.html, the max size is 32, but cannot be larger than 16 bue to only storing 24-bits of filesize info in each inode rather than 25. The 8,847,360 number obtained above was the result of calculating it with 4 byte addresses, which is obviously incorrect given the definition in the manual. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
see no danger in this remaining a legal supplement, as it does work well for short periods of time, and has an awful sour taste to it, thus preventing any drugging of unsuspecting people. It takes hours to begin working anyway, so that wouldn't be an issue.
I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
As it has become apparent that your account will be used solely for unconstructive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} to this page. (talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"The navigation template goes into the article ==
Where the heck do you wantit to go? Bottom of the page? Not the ""standard format"", but it works for me, for now.
== " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
KISS MY DICK
...ALL 3 OF YOU | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Lol your edits
24.129.237.34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
RopeMarks bondage picture
Your recent move from Bondage (BDSM) to Bondage (sexual) has caused the image link to the picture of a female bondage model I took at BoundCon 2008 to break. The reason is that, because of frequent vandalism, this image was added to MediaWiki:Bad image list, where it was set that it can only be shown at Bondage (BDSM), Rope bondage and BoundCon. Your recent move requires a change to this list, but I'm not sure how to go about to request such a change. | Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Added a stub for article Duos II. (2¢) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The definition is extended so that it eats also functions. A function from M to R^n would still be a function and NOT a tangent vector. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Main Page
I think whoever is really writing this article should try to get it featured on the main page before the election, because after the election who cares? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"I'm back. I already created ID (occasionally forget to log in but you can see the same class C when I do) I collected a massive number of diff edits on Balkanfever who pretends to be neutral but is on record] getting blocked for saying this about Greeks under a previous handle. (not to mention his personal talk page is one big anti-Greek rant fest pointing to questionable FYROM news sources with highly exaggerated sensationalist titles)
""No, Assfuckers (has a nice ring to it D) use it as a pejorative term.
I was ready to pull the trigger on both him, admin Futper, and a few others (e.g. Macedoniaboy who says he is a ""proud fighter for united Macedonia on his talk page) with a detailed complaint about anti-Greek propaganda but since Futper managed a civil discussion with me and now seems to be sticking to debating articles (rather than threats of blocking) I'm going to avoid escalating this further for now. ns.
As for the current naming disputing article... I agree with you that some FYROM citizens honestly believe their claims but I don't think that reduces the existential threat to Greece. Communism fell 17 years ago in Yugoslavia and the FYROM government appears to be getting worse not better (imagine if in two hundred years they call themselves ""ethnic Athenians"" and the cycle continues until their is no Greece left).
There appear to be important quotes missing from the naming dispute article that clearly demonstrate that FYROM leadership are confused about their own national identity (and confusing their own citizens in the process unfortunately). I tried to add this to the talk page of the article but Futper deleted it (arguing ancient Macedon is unrelated to the article even though his own editing history shows him adding an edit arguing that ancient Macedon wasn't Greek) I didn't want to get into a revert war over simply a discussion of perceived facts but since I didn't think those facts should be censored either I thought perhaps you could add them to discussion on the naming dispute talk page. (assuming you see it as relevant yourself of course)
February 26, 1992: The FYROM's President Kirov Gligorov, at an interview by the Foreign Information Service daily report, Easten Europe, stated: '""We are Slavs, who came to the region in the sixth century. We are not descendants of the ancient Macedonians.'
""January 22, 1999: The FYROM's Ambassador in Washington D.C., Mrs. Ljubica Acevska, gave a speech on the present situation in the Balkans, she stated: '""We do not claim to be descendants of Alexander the Great. We are Slavs and we speak a Slavic language. Greece is The FYROM's second largest trading partner and its number one ""investor.""'
February 24, 1999: The FYROM.'s Ambassador to Canada, Gyordan Veselinov, in an interview with the ""Ottawa Citizen"", he admitted: '""We are not related to the northern Greeks who produced leaders like Philip and Alexander the Great. We are Slavs and our language is closely related to Bulgarian. There is some confusion about our identity.""'
I think the above needs to be compared to that of their current hard line prime minister's recent behavior. He directly contradicts FYROM's own government's previous comments about themselves (that apparently was unauthentically meant to assure foreigners that Greeks were imagining FYROM propaganda and to reduce the issue to a childish dispute over simply names.. in order to get recognition)
Prime Minister Gruevski officially meets Prince Ghazanfar of Pakistan] who claims to be related to Alexander the Great.. then uses it as an opportunity to suggest FYROM citizens are related to ancient Macedonians. (and don't get me started on that incident where Gruevski layed a wreath where a picture of ""United Macedonia"" was clearly present... which also seems to be missing from the existing article)
" | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Name
The college has changed its name to simply Collin College, and did that over a year ago. Furthermore they now have a program that is a venture with several major universities whereby they offer Bachelors, Masters, and Doctoral Degrees. This along with a student body of over 45K, should the 'community college' part of the name be removed? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Upcoming album, Screaming Bloody Murder
This seems legit. The catalog number seems real. See , found after I did a Google search using the catalog number from the Allmusic listing of the album. meh " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Too many parentheses.
It sounds to personal with all those parentheses. Can someone please clean that up? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Can you, or anyone, please tell me what's going on? Email me or something, whatever it takes. This is ridiculous. I don't care for games. ++: t/c | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
I contacted you, and only you, because you are currently the only one who has said that POV problems remain, but you have not chosen to elaborate on the talk page. I am therefore inviting you to return to the article talk page and enumerate those concerns so that we can discuss them. Given that the article has changed substantially since you made your original post regarding POV issues, it is even more necessary to be specific about what particular things you see as problematic. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Merit badge collecting FAC
I have put this article Merit badge collecting (BSA) up as a Featured Article Candidate. Many improvements have been made this week. I thought may like to look at it again and if so inclined, vote on it. Thanks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
The source clearly says or criticise it in any way. So where is the misunderstanding, I think it cannot be read in more then one way? According to the quote, general criticism of Soviet Union will become illegal. And I must say that I find this to be a truly sad day for Russia, when that happens. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Articles
Ive just deleted The Bug3r3r Team (or however that was spelled), and notice 2 other deletion requests on other articles here. I also read your note on that article's talk page, and think you may be misunderstanding the purpose of Wikipedia. We only allow articles on subjects that are notable; generally, this means that they have been discussed in detail in multiple, independent reliable sources. That means that a company that's just recently started, that has never produced a product, and that, by the way those were written, seem closer to a group of friends, is not a suitable subject for a WP article. Basically, if you can't find a number of newspaper (etc.) articles discussing the company, it shouldn't have an article. I hope this explains why these articles were deleted.
In connection to this, I need to ask you to stop creating articles on businesses of this type. Continuing to do so adds extra work for other editors and administrators, and these are clearly non-notable companies (so much so that we used the expedited Speedy Deletion Process). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hello friend
Just to tell you that I cannot tolerate wrong information on wikipedia.
You guys have to give all aspects of a information, be it good, bad, acceptable, unacceptable, or controversial, without hiding anything to make the information complete. Wikipedia is the information people trust upon, so it implies that has to be 100% true. Be bold, that is how you can bring a change, you are in the position to do just that.
One who fears, has a very good reason, that he cannot face the truth. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
By the way, what is meant by ""Unmet human needs""? - " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"::::::::There's another good section of WP:V, one of the three principal policy statements of the Wikipedia project. It's called WP:SOURCES:
Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. .... In general, the best sources have a professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments .... Material from reliable non-academic sources may also be used, particularly if it appears in respected mainstream publications. Other reliable sources include university-level textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and mainstream newspapers.
Please explain Trine Day's fact-checking process to me, and post a few links demonstrating their reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Prove to me that it's a ""respected publishing house.""
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
":::You just don't give up do you? Why don't you try doing something positive, ""stats section is unencyclopedic"". It's getting really stale. a couple of comments here and there, from the peanut gallery, doesn't dictate policy. How statisistics on eating disorders on an article on eating disorders is ""uncyclopedic"", is beyond me. This is being positive , contributing images and information that might actually be interesting or useful, at least I make the effort. As I understand personal attacks are a no no, but criticising the content is not, criticising the content is a bit hard to do in some cases, because there is little to no content to criticise. It also seems that does who criticise the most contribute the least. Like this,, oops there is nothing there. Just to reiterate a fact, there was no interest displayed by you in this article at all, despite the fact that you have been on Wikipedia for years, now it seems to be a pressing concern.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Condolences to you, your wife and family...my prayers are with you.. ☥ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You Need To Stop.
What difference does it make if the episodes of ANY show have their own articles? You're acting like a major geek. Will WP collapse within itself if it's not perfect? I think the Joker said it best when he said:
THE ONLY SENSIBLE WAY TO LIVE IN THIS WORLD IS WITHOUT RULES
And don't EVEN try to tell me that WP would be terrible without rules. You can have moderators to stop vandalism, JUST STOP FUCKING REDIRECTING. It's getting on my nerves, along with about 75% of WP users. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
REDIRECT Talk:1954–55 Mexican Primera División season | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I love Wikipedia
This place is hilarious! Why isn't the article protected? Is there a possibility that something special might happen in his life which would need to be include in the article? I imagine that this page is an absolute magnet for looney tunes without Wikipedia accounts. I'm not sure, but I think there are still some parts which say that he is ""supposedly"" dead, but these might have already been fixed by the recent revert. In case I've been logged out again (damn cookies!) I'm " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Vacuum_Insulated_Evaporator
Hello,
How would I go about seeking permission to use your image of the Vacuum Insulated Evaporator my an online e-course I am developing on medical gases please?
Thank you,
Rachelle 193.62.3.251 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This picture doesn't make sense.
That looks closer to Pluto being 18% of the size of Earth if they were both 2-dimensional objects. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
.
If one did leave out carbon atoms then that would not be correct. Example, what would methamphetamine be if you left out a carbon atom?
What are left out are hydrogen atoms and they should be, since it has been previously pointed out, they would unduly clutter the diagram and are unnescesary as being implyed anyway | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
GAN for 2013 Cotton Bowl Classic
Thanks for reviewing the American football GA - I've decided to review one of the articles you had for GA because that is a pretty significant game and would be a good GA if passed. Nidhiki05 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sorry: I went to the right page and provided an explanation there and above here in this talk page I thought (maybe it didn't get saved?), but the tag didn't look the way I thought it was going to look. I just wanted the graphic tag, not the whole page. I used didn't work the way I thought it was working. I'm trying to find the right tag. The explanation is in the talk page I thought. I'll look for the right link to it. I've run out of time for this, and I'm very tired at this point. So I don't know how soon I can find what is needed.NYScholar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Coming back to this issue I'd like to combine these into Oregon legislative elections, 2008. For one thing, it meshes better with the legislative session articles I've been working on between every two session articles is one election article, and vice-versa. For another, both these articles are pretty short, and combining them would make for a nice sized article. Finally, because of the nice clean structure you made, it would be a very easy merge to accomplish. OK by you? - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
There's nothing further to discuss. Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
(outdent) How about looking at it like this. RPG rulebooks are just that. The rulebook explains how to play the game, but it is not the game itself. The ISBN manual you reference below supports this; games ""SHALL NOT"" be given ISBNs. There may be some confusion in the matter, but one good example is found by harking back to AD&D; 2nd Ed. To play that game required (it being rules heavy, that really is pretty much true) a minimum of two books—the DM Guide and the Players' Handbook. Neither ""contained"" the game, and the game went far beyond what was in either. The game in all its entirety encompassed the contents of many books, magazine articles, supplements, pamphlets, online articles and what was in the head of the players. The book is about the game; it is not the game.
For that matter, a number of the articles you tagged did not list an ISBN, so you can't really claim that you claimed it was a book in ignorance because of the ISBN. A publisher doesn't mean it's a book, as board games, computer games, and any number of things are published and have publishers.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Wangi said>>> who are you Reswobslc, or stupidcupid?
Well now you show yourself in your true colours for all to see. Now you accuse me of being two users? You find that a worthwhile comment? Now your making yourself look stupid. Well done!
Wangi said>>> I'm sorry if you think pointing out that in fact I didn't do something you alleged me to is a ""weak response"",
If I quote another user, and then reply to that quote, forgive me for making this sound simple but..99% of users would know im addressing my remarks to the person being quoted. Of course if your saying you weren’t sure if those were your remarks or not, that you could read through a couple of paragraphs to refresh your memory as to whether you said that or not than of course its all my fault. I should have placed a 12 foot banner saying THIS QUOTE IS NOT FROM WANGI!....maybe I should do that for every post? Or maybe your saying you post as more than one user and you forgot which ID you used?
Wangi said>>> but I'm getting a little pissed off here with your lack of care for facts - if you're going to say I did or said something then please be careful enough to make sure I did do/say those things.
Well yes we see your use of the English language in all its glory once again here. If every post must specify whther its addressed at you or not I can see how frustrating it must be reading through wiki at all.
Wang said>>> Wikipedia is an encyclopedia: not a link directory, and not a tourist guide"" - makes plenty sense to me.
Yes it does make sense. Of course you left out the context of my question which relates not to the general point of wiki but to the bias of some users (you) to which links they want to see. We already know you alone claimed the first link was spam and you removed it on that basis. Even users who don’t think the link should have been there agreed it was not spam. So your poor judgment is not in doubt. Your following days of rant showed your true reason for not wanting the link, it was because you didn’t like the idea of the site also selling hotel rooms. The link to the visitor centre is still there by the way, which shows it was regarded as being a legitimate item to link to. My point still remains that if its worth linking to the first link was far more useful to the general public.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
ANI is a waste of time. That's where the school of piranha lives. And I'm not threatening you, so please don't distort what I'm saying. I'm protecting the Wikipedia project. That is my sole purpose for this inquiry. I believe your admin practices deserve review, and I believe there is a venue other than ANI or RFC where such complaints are heard. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.