text
stringlengths 6
5k
| racial_origin
int64 0
3
| gender_sex
int64 0
3
| religion
int64 0
3
| ability
int64 0
3
| violence
int64 0
3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"
Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the template. — Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Glossary templates question
Hi. I've recently been learning about and implementing the glossary templates at a few articles, and am greatly appreciative. So first off, thanks! (They've been happily received at Glossary of chess and Glossary of chess problems, and nobody has objected to them at Glossary of botanical terms.)
There's a complication at Glossary of ancient Roman religion, where, the editors are very receptive to the possibilities, but are wondering if it's possible to retain the per-entry [edit] links, that they currently enjoy from having each entry in a ====sub-header====. Any suggestions? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
WHO WAS EXECUTED BY HENRY VII??????? ANSWER ME NOW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
I found it on a personal blog website, you have my permission to delete it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
]] all link to [[WP:LEAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I think that Eric Corbett has been unfairly scapegoated to the extent that he has become an unwitting symbol of these kinds of problems on the encyclopedia. But he and many members of his ""fan club"" are largely to blame for this (though you are not one of them, to my knowledge), as they are the ones loudly obstructing attempts to deal with the problems not caused by Corbett, and a number of them harass anyone who even suggests that Corbett be held accountable for what he has actually done. (talk) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Rat (zodiac). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. (Talk | Contribs) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(Municipal solid waste vs. Litter, per my nomination rationale.) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
sorry mate
Sorry mate, but your meaasges on James May's talk page prove that you are a sad little prat. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Hesperian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ah, you are a great administrator. Thanks for your kind words. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Of course. I'll remove it now. It just looked suspicious because you did not explain why you were removing it (you can do so using an edit summary). Sorry if the generic warning I posted (saves time, etc., etc., especially when dealing with loads of bad faith additions when recent change patrolling) seemed a bit harsh. Hope you stick around ). Best, ✈ " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Talkback
~~ Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Communist or not is not the issue here, map clearly states ""the Soviet Union and its allies"" - in red, and ""Non-aligned and neutral countries"" in green. Yugoslavia was founder and member of Non-aligned movement and therefore the map is inaccurate." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Proposed Intervening Section on ""Controversial New York Times Story""
Rather than argue over the title or contents of the disputed second section regarding the pertinence of the controversial petition itself, I propose to insert an intervening section about the controversy stirred up by the appearance of Kenneth Chang's 2006 story in the NY Times, wherein Picard's name is mentioned. The reason I find it necessary to do this is because some elements of Chang's story, which report claims of the DI have been blithely elevated to facthood, without benefit of a critical examination of the reported claims.
Here is my initial draft for the new section, to appear below the biography and above the discussion of the controversial DI petition.
Controversial New York Times Story
In February 2006, the New York Times ran an investigative story Few Biologists but Many Evangelicals Sign Anti-Evolution Petition by Kenneth Chang of the New York Times Science Desk, reporting that the Discovery Institute had launched a new websiteDissent From Darwin to promote their expanded public relations campaign regarding how theories of evolution should be taught in public school. The new website included a list of signatories to an earlier petition which the Discovery Institute had termed ""A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism.""Signatories of 'A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism' The petition dated back to 2001 when it was first published by the Discovery Institute beneath an ad criticizing a forthcoming PBS series on evolution.2001 ""100 Scientists"" Ad] The headline on the Discovery Institute's 2001 ad was also ""A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism,"" although the petition itself, embedded at the bottom of the ad, did not carry that label (it bore no label at all). The untitled 2001 version of the petition simply read, ""We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.""
Chang's story disclosed that Professor Picard's name appeared on the petition cited by the newly launched Dissent From Darwin website, but the Times article did not distinguish which version she signed. Indeed, Professor Picard's name first appeared on the original 2001 untitled two-sentence petition and her name remained on the subsequent controversially yclept versions, including the most recent one appearing on the new website. Chang's story neither substantiated nor refuted the claims of the Discovery Institute that the two-sentence petition supported or endorsed DI's slant on its meaning, but the story did include a mixture of quotes from some of the people whose names appeared on the list at different times, including some quotes that cast doubt on the Discovery Institute's characterization of all the petition signers as variously ""dissenters from Darwinism"" or ""anti-evolution."" Chang's story, in conjunction with the Discovery Institute's website and its attached list of petition signers left a wake of confusion over who among the list of signers of the earlier versions of the petition agreed with or consented to the Discovery Institute's characterization of the petition signers as ""anti-evolution"" ""dissenters"" who presumably supported the emerging and evolving agenda of the Discovery Institute. It is at present unknown to what degree, if any, Picard agrees with or supports the Discovery Institute's controversial interpretation of the petition as ""dissent."" It is also unknown whether Picard has ever supported any or all of the ongoing political agenda of the Discovery Institute.
The last two sentences of the proposed new section reflect the absence of verifiable published information regarding the attitude of most of the original 103 signers. So far, Wikipedia has only managed to obtain a reliably sourced comment from Stanley N. Salthe, who disputed DI's characterization and supplied his own salty attitude, ""A plague on both their houses.""
Skip Evans of the NSCE similarly casts doubt on the DI's interpretation, saying
The Statement
The signatories appear to attest to a statement about the ability of natural selection to ""account for the complexity of life"" - in other words, a statement about how evolution t | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Talknic. NMMGG has removed the problematical terms, so for the moment, I think it best to concentrate on the other issues. Whether or not, in the future, near or far, this lead can be finessed to include nakba and the associated terms will depend on the progress generally in that and other articles, perhaps. 14:36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Just a question...
Talk about Lir, not to them:How do we know that these ""ban timer reset"" edits aren't just someone who hates Lir trying to get him in more trouble? 23:15, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FYI, the tool appears not to be counting properly. It's currently only updating to about 34 verified hooks when there are over 50 on the Suggestions page. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! | Talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dear Hal, what Mojoworker said, basically. You have been the most superb contributor here. Enjoy your retirement, and please feel free to pop back in any time! With my very best wishes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I added a link back to RHCP... What else needs to be done? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
}}
I did not do it on purpose this is so unfair.....how was I supposed to know you have to be logged on everytime to make edits?? as I said I am new here. I want someone to review this issue before blocking me!!! I have not made any personal attack on anyone! I said Dirty Jatt( he says hes a Jatt on his page) because the user is doing things in a dirty manner instead of providing more input n citations he blindly removes them.Again I have nothing to do with sockpupetry or anything as you can see I clearly admitted and said it was a mistake ! I am not hiding anything!! | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By the way, I like the way your user page used to look. It's your page; there's no reason not to have it a mess (as long as it's not in any real categories; it shouldn't be in the Yu-Gi-Oh category). 21:30, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I think I put what you needed on your talk page. DPetersontalk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
ATTENTION: Government Dis Info Agent. Flattery will get you no where with me . Copyright laws allow ""Free Use"" of material related to science and technlogy! Let the games begin!!!" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Maybe so, but I hate when conductors do this. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Help
Plz Help in Restoring Barelwi Article which is becoming Vitim of some Biased users. also i got this message that Shabiha must be thrown out on the discusion page of Barelwi [] y Abureem. Plz help.
(t • c) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
AfD nomination of Friends 'Til the End
I have nominated Friends 'Til the End, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friends 'Til the End. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
The difference between a first serialization and a reprint
The difference is that there's a difference.
It is as simple as anything to say that the relevant stories were published as first serializations in such and such a periodical on such and such a date. Badabing, badaboom, done. And that's how to put it accurately.
Specific words for specific rights mean specific things in any kind of intellectual property field.
In writing, if I have ""first serialization"" rights and I publish a ""reprint"" without owning the rights to ""reprint"" or having permission from the entity that does own the rights to ""reprint,"" I'm up a creek.
If I, as an author, sell my story as ""first serialization"" rights to a magazine (customarily, it would be something more limited like first serialization rights for North America), then I retain all other kinds of ""first"" rights to my story.
The distinction wouldn't matter if we were talking about Wolfowitz's or someone else's personal blog where they referred to whatever as a ""reprint."" That would be oh, whatever, he didn't know the difference and just used the wrong word.
Contracts for stories or books are real specific about exactly what rights are going to be owned by who, and under what conditions and for how long. That specificity is why the terminology matters.
This is not Wolfowitz's personal blog. This is an encyclopedia. In a personal blog, the distinction between ""first serialization"" and ""reprint"" don't matter. In an encyclopedia, it does.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Derivative Work
Please add the below text in derivative work.
Yajnaseni, wrote by Pratibha Ray is Mahabharata from perspective of Draupadi. This book won Moorti Devi Award in 1991 and has been translated from Oriya in many languages including Hindi and English. Yuganta written by Irawati Karve talks about characters of Mahabharata. The book written in Marathi was translated in English and won Sahitya Akademi Award in 1968. After Kurukshetra written by Mahashweta Devi is a reflection on what happened to some of Mahabharata characters after the great war. Mritunjay written by Shivaji Sawant is on the most enigmatic character of Mahabharata, Karna. Shivaji Swant also wrote Yugandhar which is a biopic of Krishna. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You're a jerk!
You're a jerk!
You're a jerk!
You're a jerk!
You're a jerk!
You're a jerk!
You're a jerk!
You're a jerk!
You're a jerk!
You're a jerk!
You're a jerk!
You're a jerk!
You're a jerk!
You're a jerk!
JACKASS!! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
I attempted some changes in punctuation and grammar. Hopefully I didn't change the meaning of the translation. Thanks for providing the reference. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Then again, why waste DRV's time when it can be dealt with on the talk page. — talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I stay in a hostel. If my terminal was used by somebody, then what i will do. I always log out. And i carefully type my password to check my any other students are behind me. Now i understand that can be a victim. At that time i was making comments against him on his talk page. I never knew i will face the same problem like him. And i want to know the accounts that you think were created through my terminal. Emperor
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
March 2015 (UTC)
I agree completely with Gudzwabofer. We cannot let drug companies take over the planet, Jytdog, and you, Jytdog, are obviously attempting to make people fall for allopathy. 13:38, 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Afudge
I'm pretty sure i didn't do that | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Oh by the way, the lede includes the same data on sex ratios in India's provinces 3 times over. Please be careful to avoid these kind of shortfalls. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"== Merge proposal ==
I would support a merge, but the current suggestion has Mergefrom ""Grosser . . . "" Mergeto ""Großer . . ."". Perhaps this should be the other way round. Although possibly disputed, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (standard letters with diacritics) appear to recommend not using ""ß"":
""For special-case characters such as þ, ð and ß, because of the limited geographic regions in which these letters are used, English-speakers in other parts of the world (especially those for whom English is a second language) often find these symbols incomprehensible and unpronounceable. Difficulties also arise in terms of how to alphabetize them, since most English speakers, even those for whom English is their native language, do not know where to place them in a standard alphabet. As a result, this guideline recommends that their use be avoided in article titles.""
I presume the Swiss would also use the ""ss"" spelling. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did at The Real Inspector Hound. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thank you and support
Thank you Niceguyedc for the edit on the Fresh Kid Ice page. It is appreciated, I am trying to make pages for all the 2 Live Crew Members and new single. I have been focusing on the Fresh Kid Ice Page but an overzealous user is trying to destroy what I built. Anyways nice to see you care keep up the good work. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(Basically, that he's a 192-pound Vegan with zero personality and a wrestler in a promotion attempting to distance itself from wrestling, and has no place ever sniffing the title!) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
I wasn't stalking user: Active Banana. If you go through my edits you will see that I asked him/her to discuss on the talk page of the articles and I barely got a chance to discuss the Rain article because I was blocked. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You have mail
Adler | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I'm a childish comment? Wow, that's pure genius, I must congratulate you on your ability to perpetuate a well known American stereotype. Can I also be so bold as to recommend that when you go to school tomorrow you ask your English teacher to teach you the difference between Your and You're Talk " | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Also see this edit summary for why I reverted you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hi World! Hows it going | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
2. The other at overbite.crewer (yada, yada) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I did just now see this, and was posting here when we were editing at the same time. I guess that maybe is all the evidence we need (though everyone else is just saying ""found dead Sunday""), and I won't contest a change back to Feb. 2. However, I should say that with an encyclopedia, I'm uncomfortable without some examiner saying, "" dead four hours"" or ""dead 12 hours"" — since without that, I don't see how the '""Times'' or anyone else can definitively say Sunday. What does everyone else thing? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Eastenders Images
Hi, I noticed you're updating a lot of Eastenders stuff, was just wondering whether giving Sid his own article is really necessary, he only appeared for like 5 minutes in one episode. ( ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Crime and poverty
Crime and poverty are indeed rated as major factors for mortality. I'm not sure if you were being serious or not on the CFD, but I found your comment slightly off the mark. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Written by?
I know Paul, in Miles' 'Many Years From Now' states that he doesn't remember John contributing to the writing of this song at all, although it is stated that he did in other sources(like in 'Revolution In The Head').
So far I haven't seen John ever commenting on this song, so what exactly is this co-credit based on?
Any ideas? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
pushing, advising, digging out sources, c/e-ing, fact checking, knocking me over the head whenn necessary | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Stupid fucking bitch rot in hell piece of shit | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
"
September 2008
Warning regarding your edit to Steely Dan.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -The'FortyFive' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Headmaster
Can you please revert the change to the headmaster article? The man is a headmaster of the school, that is totally appropriate. As of the moment the article choate rosemary hall does not have a link to its headmaster. For the 850 students and 16,000 alumni, plus numerous visiters, having a bio for the schools' headmaster is crucial. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Kate on 'Today' about Jon's alleged cheating
After that interview airs this morning on the east coast, it's on like Donkey Kong. You CAN'T NOT include their marriage troubles in her entry if *she* *herself* addresses them as an issue. Even if her bio states there was tabloid rumors of marriage problems but Kate has said everything's fine, it SHOULD be included in her bio. Nothing critical regarding the Gosselins has made it into the Wiki entries(even the possible child exploitation of them doing the show). Let's keep it fair and *not* an infomercial, shall we? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
[[Talk:Zondervan|Talk page Zondervan
Thank you very much for your input. However please review the financial issue again. Jsharpminor writes ""tens of millions."" You can't find that term in either source he supplied, unless I missed it which I'm willing to take lumps for. While the mention of financial issues has sourcing, the comment ""tens of millions"" doesn't. Again, he's trying to generate criticism for the sake of just generating it. Why exaggerate the source? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Currently the 2nd paragraph doesn't mention the countries of the inventors. So I would suggest: Uppsala (sweden) and Wiltshire (UK) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Until you provide relevant sources of academic quality there is no need for the section to exist in the article. Wikipedia is not a place where you put all kind of information you like. It is a reference encyclopedia which recognizes only reliable sources. Moreover the content should be removed from the article until a consensus is reached. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
United States home front during World War II. If there are no significant objections I'll move it accordingly in a day or two. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Just because the source is old, it doesn't make the information invalid. I doubt you can provide a source which back up your claims. On that basis, edits reverted. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Hmmm 44 minutes. May I have your permission to do the obvious experiment? SpielChequers " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
User categorisation
You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Italy page as living in or being associated with Italy. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Italy for instructions. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Up to you, sure. — '''''' | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
David line
so true, I will try if I have time to write some of the article but i am not making no guarantees i only have time to look at my messages and categorize some articles which i've been needing to do for a long time I may have a little but more time though | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It looks like you're actually a Russian or a Russia expert, so I'm probably going to loose this one, but well, let's hear why I'm wrong in any case -) 08:15, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
http://gall.dcinside.com/board/view/?id=arm&no;=375286&page;=1 These photos are all taken form the book I mentioned before. Yes, I was banned before. But does that matter? You are the one who doesn't know how to differentiate between a reliable source and an unreliable source. Learn to read English, and use your eyes. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You claimed I vandalized...
Yet I did not. Either you're an illiterate dumbass, or you're just a jerk. Which one is it? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Famous connections slot
I am interested in cleaning this part up. I am not an expert so I may not clean it up to Wikipedia hierarchy standards but I hope I can help clean up the drivel that exists which links anyone that is anyone that's ever breathed in Maghull. A number of the links are red and some are multiple people aswell. I will start of with a minor clean up of the text. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sorry to bother you a third time; this time I think will really be the last. I have old accounts that I want cleaned out that are already known to be me, and are well over a year old. Namely:
- delete the talk page, WP:OLDIP applies anyway aside from my request here.
- If anything on that talk page is of lasting value, blank it and redirect to User talk:Shalom Yechiel; otherwise just delete it. I leave it to your judgment; if you think it's a wash, just delete it. Again, nothing there is more recent than June 2007, a long long time ago. (Shalom) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I intentionally gave you a vandalism warning after an error in judgement on my part. I quickly realized my error, and tried to clean it up as soon as possible. But you had already received the ""You Have a new message (last change)"" banner, and had responded before I had a chance to fix it. Again, sorry. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Cram ==
Please stop reverting Cram, the book was used is Cram's Big Dumb Book of Stupid Lists!! Please stop it!!
== | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Using the conditional in place of the subjunctive is grating, too -) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hey, he's my sworn enemy...anything I can do to undermine his cause and get him banned I shall endevor upon. Do you have any ideas? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
"
Change my ways? I have been suspended 3 times and I have the same mind on things as I have always had. Blocking me will not ""change my ways"". I want the articles not to be put with unneeded and false information and it's wikipedians like you who try to stop me. And please do not spy and be noisey on me." | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
February 2008 (UTC)
It IS wikipedia, the infobase for EVERYTHING! 11:01, 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Question
Are you and Fram gay buddies per chance? You to seem to enjoy following each other around and you seem to do Fram’s bidding. Perhaps Fram is the more dominant one in your relationship? | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
its 1962 and change is in the air in baltimore. tracy turnblad, a girl with big hair and big dreams, has only one passion in life - to dance on the corny collins show. when her chance arrives , she grooves her way into instant stardom and the eyes of teen dream link larkin. but with the programs scheming stage manager against her, trend setting tracy will need the help of her best friends her big hearted mother and motormouth maybelle to show the world that all you need to make a dream come true is a toe tappin beat and a little hairspray! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Which three years did this run? 17:45, Jun 30, 2004 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thus I'm wondering if he faced any of the same controversy at the time. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
regarding milind kamat
you should not have deleted the comment. let the truth prevail. He has spoiled many lives due to his lustiness | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
it doesnt offend me about painful death or the war no, its unfortunately the way our world is today. Also | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
is also mean and blunt to other members. If, for example, user X said something like: Pinoy Big Brother's darlings, Eaglestorm would make a post like: PBB's darlings? How stupid. He | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Image
You`ve got it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
You appear to be new to Wikipedia. I apologize if I offended you; that was not my intention. However, what you did was improper in my opinion. A better option, rather than deleting my comment (which I imagine was embarrassing to you, as I exposed that you were trying to insert your own original research into Wikipedia), would have been merely to add a note that your ideas had been published elsewhere. Instead you chose to rewrite the history of the discussion page so as to remove your own dubious actions. This isn't appreciated, nor is attempting to call my edits ""vandalism,"" when it was you who was trying to cover your erroneous tracks. But that's all I have to say about it. Better luck next time. - " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Sorry for my vandalism
Sorry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Fair use rationale for Image:PEIFL_logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:PEIFL_logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~ Wikihermit " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Really? Name one edit where I harrassed him. And besides, the edit that I made today was for something completely different than that revert thing. I wasn't going to, nor will I, make any more edits to his user talk page. (talk | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Merry Christmas
I just wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas 25 December 2006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I've had feeback from WP UK Geog - Geog talk. You were quite right to change, but for a different reason. I can now get on with the task. Many thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Nationality of people from the United Kingdom
RE this page Wikipedia:Nationality_of_people_from_the_United_Kingdom
I'm finding the Irsish/ Northern Irish issue quite hard work. I thought your earlier version said the same things as mine (just was too technical throughout, which is the only reason I swapped mine back - I took a while trying to get it simple). ie that (in brief) a NI person can be British, dual or Irish, regarding their citizenship?
RE your new edit - I don't understand now how all Northern Irish are Irish full-stop. Surely you need a papers to be a citizen of any country? Can you explain it to me here, or ideally on the Biography MOS talk page, where I made this subsection on Northern Ireland. At the moment the words Northern Irish links to this anchor link on ""Citizenship and identity"" which talks about an 'entitlement' to 'claim' Irish citizenship.
If this is about pre-Stormont times, perhaps that fact can be written in - on top of the 'legal' details (about dual passports's etc)? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"And lets be frank, its not as if you give a toss about your ""collegues"". All you do is deleate, deleate, deleate, deleate, deleate and yeah more deleates! Hypocrite " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
" July 2006 (UTC)
Yes, only Sanandana was called and was thus given the name Padmapada. Also, thanks for copy-editing. I'll also follow up on it asap. Talk 13:52, 25" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
think you are a double headed breast!!!!!!!!!!!11111
i am t3h l337 , i love your porn sites!!! ftw love j + s <3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Your personal attacks
This is to advise you to refrain from posting false allegations about supposedly using sock-puppets or being someone's sock-puppet. I have removed these false allegations as they violate the Wikipedia policy of ""no personal attacks"".
22:07, 2004 Dec 30 (UTC)" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Its because thats what ZQ wants, and some wiki-editors have been in direct contact with her on social media, thats where the pictures on her personal wiki-page comes from.
It's because it's a shit photo of her. They're all terrible because none of them are a plain portrait but why does it matter to you that one of the ones she gave permission to the Wikimedia Commons to host were for the sole purpose of providing a new photograph for the press to use rather than the one where she's at the games conference?— (琉竜) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Fairly irrelevant claims to the point being discussed, I am afraid..
One final note, as it is appearantly you are here who is claiming that the LW losses were such in the Battle of Britain that they were irreplacable and the LW strenght decreased after the Battle, the burden is proof is upon you by showing us figures with references for the entire Luftwaffe. 20:39 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ycrVi3Av9c&feature;=related at 7:12 there is a shot of Kirk with the caption ""Noel's nephew.""" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I support listing Sealand - It meets the meaningful criteria. Poor Sealand has trouble fitting on any list since it is a non-traditional state. Nonetheless, it is sovereign, independent, and generally unrecognized. - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Received. I don't think there is anyway of protecting this address from autoblocking, though I may be wrong. Admins can't see the IP address of the user that is blocked. You might want to post at WP:VPT to see if they can help you. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.