text
stringlengths 6
5k
| racial_origin
int64 0
3
| gender_sex
int64 0
3
| religion
int64 0
3
| ability
int64 0
3
| violence
int64 0
3
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
"
I agree completely that content review processes need to be monitored for hasty nominations and other immaturity, but I believe that it isn't necessarily the fault of people below the age of 16 or 18. As a side note, the editor in question in the NYC meetup video appeared to behave in a very mature and professional manner. – '''Happy Holidays''' " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
There's a thorough analysis here but it's way too complicated for this article. The figure in Geert-Jan van Oldenborgh's article a few years ago would be good because it gives the cycle length in years, which I think is what we want for a layman-oriented article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I would add that L. Ron Hubbard is a person whose history is of great interest to many readers. This is not only a verifiable assertion, but also a notable, pertinent one. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Support This describes a particular historical event, not all revolutions that took place in Batavia or were of a Batavian character. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
To faithlessfaggotboy: Suck my dick you goddamn gay-lovin piece of shit liberal. If I ever met you on the street I'd knock your empty head off your shoulders. | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
"
Wikipedia:Ignore all rules
I'm not reverting, but I ask that you please perform a dummy edit (without labeling it ""minor"") to document the change's nature (and ideally affirm that you regard it as a legitimate improvement, not merely a social experiment).As explained at Help:Minor edit, ""a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute"" You noted an expectation of controversy, so that obviously isn't the case. — " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your , but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement ""I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later.""
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the ""Village pump"". You can also leave a message on my talk page. ... talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
lol ernie the grouch | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PLEASE HOW DOES THE Category:Requests for unblock THING WORK? I TIRED TO PUT IT ON THE RIGHT PAGE BUT WHAT AM I DOING WRONG?! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
For Jesus as a carpenter, see Bart Ehrman, Misquoting Jesus, chapter 7. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Adoption
Hell Suncatcher 13! I wanted to get back to you about adoption. Unfortunately, my work and school schedule does not allow me to spend as much time editing as I would like. I don't think I can really make a commitment to an adoptee. I don't want to go halfway and then quit because of my schedule. I am very sorry to turn you down. If you need any help with questions here and there, I am happy to answer them and should be able to do that in a timely manner. I just don't think I can sign up for a full adoption program. Again, I apologize. I hope to see your edits soon! Cheers! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FUCK OFF YOU CRYBABY SHIT OF A MAN | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Songs written by Morris Levy
I think your best course with Category:Songs written by Morris Levy would be to try to gather information to show in each article on a song that he was not the writer and then remove the songs from the category. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
glad i dont read your bible
you have a member of the kkk on your team. way to go, asswipe! | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
"
Criticism of Islam and Islamic extremist terrorism. On second thoughts, they don't work quite as well as I had thought, but they have a certain harmony, if criticism contains positive and negative points (because I don't think people should use the criticism section of slamming Islam. Maybe that guy linked to on Striver's page who's christian but likes islam a lot should be added?). But Islamophobia is I think a subject vague enough and thrown around so liberally it doesn't really warrant anything other than a mention in the criticism section. I also don't think the h2 should be ""Controversies"". It's naff. (Please vote here) " | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
I still think I need to create another unblock request to hopefully get the attention of an administrator who will give me a yes or no answer. Anyways, I haven't wronged a Wikipedian for 2 years now, so I think its time we hug each other and forgive one another and live in happiness. Please? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT
WIKIPEDIA IS THE OPPOSITE OF STRAIGHT | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Very nice work that! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"I don't think this article is particularly well written. It also pushes a non-fault POV. And the use of ""environmental"" is unusual! All that needs to be said is said already at obesity. Merge what needs to be saved into that article and delete would be my suggestion.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
These are round the edges of speculative theology. If you can find any statement that animals have immortal souls in a doctrinal statement (online would do) from any major church or Jewish or Islamic source, let's have it. Obviously the Dharmic regions have a completely different view. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
"== Bruce Campbell ==
U42 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to the James Weldon Johnson article. It's one that is close to my heart, and it's also always nice to see that not all anonymous editors are vandals! ) If you aren't already registered, you might read this information to learn a little about why registering is worthwhile, although not required. Best wishes, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
UPDATE: seems the article's suddenly in pretty good shape. It would still be nice if you watched it, however. I'm going to try to keep an eye on everything related to this disgraceful business, but it's not easy: this thing is spreading like an oil slick. 04:40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Is the Ellie Chronicals going to continue and why did he make it???
DEAR BMX GANG
i am very upset that John Marsdon the lawyer died and not the john marsdon that wrote the terrible tommorow series because it is simlply trash. Its a large episode of Mcleods daughters
It should be put into a cannon and shot into the sun | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
""How could it not be?"" This is an opinion. Frankly, some who are disfellowshipped are relieved, and some have already been ""gone"" so long it doesn't matter what action the elders take a point I would have thought you would jump on. But then again, you are only hearing from those that do have a problem with their experiences.
The scholarly back-up of doctrines is a separate issue, and really has no bearing on whether Witnesses believe something or not. After all, we believe that humans were created roughly 6,000 years ago, and a good number of scientists and anthropologists would hotly debate that in a New York minute (before the transit strike). The point is, the article is to present what Witnesses as a group believe, and what criticisms exist, and the extent of this criticism. There is a threshold as to what divergence is notable and worth mentioning, and how extensive coverage of it should be, and your views simply do not represent the percentage you seem to think or hope for.
You said, ""Maybe you should write to them ... and see what they say."" You are the one who seems to want/need the answer to this, so perhaps you should write to them yourself.
Watch Tower, 25 Columbia Heights, Brooklyn, NY 11201-2483 USA - " | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Thank you, I appreciate it. I'll try that out. Best regards, 19:41, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You used the term ZOG? Why does the left hate Jews, yet they love Muslims? The fact that you believe in a phoney Zionist Occupied Government and you believe they have secret police is very sad. Talk to a Jew. I have a cousin and some inlaws that are Jewish and they rock. (PS are you pro-terrorist Palestinian!? You seem so, you anti-semetic leftists!) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
February 2012 (UTC) | decline=I am delighted that you will never do anything wrong again. However, you have made 77 edits (not counting edits to this page following your block) and, looking through a large sample of them, I have not found a single one that was constructive. Under the circumstances a 48 hour block was surprisingly short: I would have expected an indefinite block. If you want the block to be reduced to an even shorter time then I suggest you indicate what constructive edits you plan to do, so as to show that unblocking you would lead to improvements in the encyclopaedia. 12:15, 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Nature of the holdings in Mimms and Miller/“Police” vs. “peace officer”
In carefully reviewing these cases, I cannot find support for the language I used several years ago, so I’ve revised it to strictly reflect what the Court actually said. Although the Court did not expressly require that a peace officer cite particularized concern for his safety, they did not expressly say that it was unnecessary, either.
The clarification of “federal law” is also important, because the Supreme Court, empowered under Article III of the US Constitution, cannot really grant “authority” to a peace officer; rather, they are limited to interpretation of laws and review for conformance with the Constitution, as they make quite clear in the citation from Mimms.
I’ve added a tag to the assertion that state law may not allow drivers or passengers to be ordered to exit the vehicle; though this assertion may be correct, it’s pretty sweeping, and needs support. It may be particularly significant in light of the Death of Sandra Bland. Many pundits have insisted that Ms. Bland’s failure to exit her car when so ordered provided cause for arrest, usually citing Mimms and Miller, and perhaps Texas Transportation Code §542.501. The Supreme Court holdings were of course limited to the Fourth Amendment, and did not (and could not) consider whether refusal to exit a vehicle after being so ordered violated state law; unless the Commerce Clause of Article I is somehow involved (and this seems unlikely), that would be a matter for state legislators to regulate, and state courts to interpret. Some states well may have done so; however, I have been unable to find anything close to dispositive, and have not seen anyone else do so. I am not going to make a project of running this down, but if someone else can provide this information, it would seem a great addition. Hopefully, any such reference would cite real decisional law that is unambiguous to the average reader, rather than a mere assertion by a third party (if the third party cannot cite authority, that party’s assertion is suspect).
“Police” vs. “peace officer”
I do not understand the suggestion that “peace officer” or “law enforcement officer” is strictly the proper term needs support; I think the linked WP article makes it quite clear that either of these terms—which refer to a superset of “police officer”—are the strictly correct usage. I used “police” simply because in some other articles, other editors—usually IP—kept changing it to “police officer,” and the bickering seemed a poor use of time. And I reasoned that if the Supreme Court can use “police”—correctly or otherwise—we cannot be faulted for doing so here. Whoever added that tag did not give a reason; absent some good reason to keep it (or perhaps a suggested rewording of the note), I’m inclined to remove the tag. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"! Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. — • T [13:53, 9 April 2006]" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Support per GHcool. ta | co | em | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
An appology is in order
Dear Colin,
I am not sure if you will have the chance to read this, or if you'll have a moment to respond, but I am a student in the University of Toronto and specifically one of the 1700 psychology students mentioned in the article. However before I go any further, may I express my most sincere and deepest appologies to you and everyone involved. I will not try to make excuses for my actions, nor will I try to do so for my fellow students as I do not speek for them. I realise (and no doubt others will too) that what we left behind was unbecoming of a sutdent at U of T. And most importantly, I realise that we did as future scholars was wrong.
I know that you and you colleagues are considering taking extreme measures to ensure the content of Wikipedia stays secure as a responce to our actions. Though I can understand where you are coming from, I do not believe that this will solve any of your problems and will only make things worse in the long-run. I see this situation as a systemic error on both of our sides, but as a first year student I have very little educational and social clout to enforce my statement. I am asking as both an avid reader of Wikipedia and as a lover of knowledge, please do not black-out our privaleges to use and edit articles. Let us both use this experience as a steping stone to learn how to go about doing this in a constructive manner benefits Wikipedia and my school.
Looking to make this a better place,
CivCodex | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Janice Rogers Brown
Thanks for your contributions to the article. I think it's important to get a good start on everyone on Bush's ""potential nominee"" list, as these pages will all get very hectic when Rehnquist actually shuffles off his mortal coil. thimk 22:06, 2005 May 3 (UTC)" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
hello gfoley4
i have 6 foot man in my basement | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Re:WestVirginia-geo-stub
yes, most places have the flags for the geo-stubs for consistency. I must admit with US states, it doesn't make them that easy to tell apart, since most of them are just blue with a coat of arms. Another option is to use a small outline map, like, say (WV's a pretty distinctive shape). Trouble is, unless a landscape is very distinctive, at that size one river looks a lot like another river (some of the NZ scenery pictures I've uploaded don't look that dissimilar when shrunk that small - the icon you had could just as easily have been my Image:Rangitikei.jpg). Unless the scenery is as distinctive as, say Mt Rushmore or Monument Valley, it'll just look like a generic landscape at that size. And if you make the images larger, they start to become too conspicuous in the article. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Anal sex
I am gay and actively engage in anal sex most nights. it doesnt hurt so whats wrong with it? | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Also bring back the brendle article you piece of shit. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
"""Would you agree there is nothing in your suggestions that justifies calling the article in its present state an ""advertisement""? I think we can continue to work on it, but the tag can be dropped."" - I don't agree with this statement at all. Right up until the article was locked, I was removing brochure language - see my edits. As Diana pointed out, there is more brochure language that needs to be removed. What concerns me is that if the article is unlocked, your ""team"" will try to undo all the edits that brought the article closer to a non-advertisement. There's a lot more to be done here not even counting reverting the edits I know are forthcoming from the Waldorf support POV lobbiests. Again, the brochure-like language of the article has been in question here for at least three months and the Waldorf project team was supposed to address this. The best way to address this, however, might be to have non-Waldorf people look at it instead of a project team populated with Waldorf people. Why not show some good faith and not force the removal of the tag while the necessary edits are taking place? Just a thought.
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/All Saints' Cathedral, Cairo. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:submitdraft}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Nicosia and discrimination against Greek contributors and the Greek character of the city
Dear Salvio,
You have accused me of abusive behaviour against other users and consequently blocked me from editing the article on Nicosia for a 24 hour period.
May I draw to your attention that it is fairly obvious that those three users namely Seb az86556 , Seric2 and Chesdovi) are clearly constantly creating a picture of Nicosia as a decadent muslim city that serves their religious beliefs and are all clearly hailing form Turkish backgrounds.
There is a constant undermining of the city´s Greek identity i.e. whenever a Greek flag, that is OMNIPRESENT in the Republic of Cyprus whether some people like it or detest it but this is the reality and an Encyclopedia that wishes to be UNBIASED should depict the REALITY and not the subjective views of a minority of readers that are furthermore based on extremist religious and nationalistic views. On the other hand, such users do find it appropriate to throw in pictures using the Turkish and the ILLEGAL, yes illegal according to United Nation referendums flat of the non-recognised internationally illegal self-proclaimed state of the so-called TRNC.
It is totally UNACCEPTABLE to have extremist nationalistic individuals, that strategically reached the level of administrators, deteriorating all the time the article on the city of Nicosia, promoting an unrealistic Turkish character and undermining the Greek character of the city AND at the same time having an ADDITIONAL article on ""North Nicosia"" that is depicting a totally FALSE picture w.r.t the city. The TRNC is illegal, not recognised by any state other than Turkey and some terrorist states that are non-democratic and yet Wikipedia has a page on Northern Nicosia by supposedly administrators that support the unification of Cyprus. This is clearly a major distortion of their intentions and a huge lie in that an individual that pretends to be a neutral aribtrator and a supoporter of reunification cannot have a separate page on Northern Nicosia stressing how Turkish it is and then go and literally destroy everything in the proper page for Nicosia and emphasize the Turkish character of the city, talk about the tension and the division of the city all the time and undermine the Greek character.
This is clear nationalistic and racial discrimination against the indisputable Greek character of the area controlled by the Republic of Cyprus and furthermore it is downgrading for the Republic of Cyprus the mere fact that Wikipedia has a site that is CONSTANTLY vandalised by several ethnic Turkish extremists and Wikipedia users support such discriminatory behaviour.
In the light of all of this, I shall stop contributing to Wikipedia as I consider it downgrading for my own self. Furthermore, I do not wish to participate in an ""encyclopedic"" project that is totally biased and discriminatory.
" | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
"
But note the essential feature: A debtor can force the acceptance of ""legal tender"" to discharge his debt ONLY if the debt is denominated in the SAME currency as the ""legal tender"" money is! To repeat myself AGAIN: If you owe me onions (and you could owe me onions!) then I can insist on repayment in onions.
All that legal tender is, is the ascribing to certain examples (coins, notes) of a particular money a special status. There is nothing to prevent two different monies being in circulation and each of them having coins & notes which are legal tender. That this is not common does not mean the contrary. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Your accusations of bad faith editing are as full of bullshit now as when you made them in the CFD. The disruptive one here is you, because you're flouting an editing consensus that has been in place for something like eight years and lying about another editor to do it. TV shows are not appropriately characterized by the people who appear on them. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Just wondering if EhuangZhang = Archaic_d00d simply based on EhuangZhang's appearance at Talk:Matthew Johns following on from their ""arguing"" at Talk:Sex and intelligence and their partiality to ""coward"" references and similar line of insult:
Are we becoming a nation of cowards?
snivelling little coward.
EhuangZhang's personal attack at Talk:Matthew Johns - and very first contribution to that article/talk page.
Of course, they may just be birds of a feather. florrie " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
OK I'll leave the note there then. I wish somebody else would wikify the page because frankly, I am not familiar enough with your tags. If you want, you can copy the photos to the page, I have no idea how to upload photos to Wikipedia. Jimmy gave the photos to me specifically so I could use them on the web site, he certainly will not object to free publicity on Wikipedia! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
asshole bastard motherfucker,even if you block me i fuckin dont care you could have moved the article to my talk page sandbox or atleast given me achance to improve it bastard!( ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
"
Your young age
I've figured out what makes you so ""interested"" in that donkey punch article. It's your age. You're a minor. A child, in other words. You're under one or both ages of majority in the United States, 18 or 21. I suspect you are a high school student under 18. Earlier, you claimed to be ""Steven Andrew Miller, a student living in Printer's Row, Chicago."" Most university students advertise their university affiliations. You didn't. Makes me think you're a child. So, just how young are you? People should know whom their dealing with, so they don't get in trouble for using profanity to a child or insulting a child or saying negative things to a child or whatever is illegal with children nowadays. It's problematic to deal with children on the internet, and you should put up a userbox indicating your age to avoid those problems. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
(which blurbs have a long history of being rejected by WP:RSN as unreliable sources) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This is absolute rubbish, I have been discussing these edits at length on the discussion page, please read it before making these ridiculous accusations! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
. Rest assured that it won't happen again | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
You are again getting me wrong. I just want all the facts to be represented. Anyway I am about to get banned from this topic very soon, so will make my points quickly. There are no Kshatriyas in the world as far as Nambuthiris are concerned. The so called ""Kshatriyas"" and ""Samantans"" which you find in Malabar and among Malabari immigrants to South Kerala, are Nairs who got elevated in caste system. As I have added many sources here, stating that all the Kshatriyas of Kerala are of Nayar origin. I just want to mention that. If you claim that they are not of Nair origin, then please tell me who they are. " | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I just moved some trivia into the main production section. Nice to help out. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
UFC 82
Seriously > Tuckdogg Faggot < ... stop being an uptight bitch... its ok for koschecks announced matchup to be on the ufc 82 page, first of all it isnt a rumor, you faggot, he confirmed it... and when Chuck liddell confirmed the UFC 79 fight, it was left TBD and second of all the ufc doesn have to announce it, the fighter does...
If Koscheck ever does end up fighting at ufc 82 im gomnna kick the shit out of you and make you suck my cock.. which is probably gonna happen since HE ANNOUNCED IT!!! FAG!!! | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Wikipedia is not a personal website
Nor a playground. I note that you have at present over 70 subpages to your userpage. This is unacceptable behaviour and contrary to the principles of Wikipedia. Please delete at least 65 of these within the next few days, or they are likely to be deleted for you; they do not benefit the WP project. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
PDP-11's Influence on the Design of C
At the top of the article, it is mentioned that the PDP-11's instruction set influenced the design of C. However, I do not see any evidence to support this claim given in the article. Could someone who knows what these alleged connections are possibly add a section about them? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Canada list
why was it deleted in the first place? it's encyclopedic. if it's not, then delete the ""list of stations in the United States that broadcast on channel 6"", too. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Vascular Parkinsonism
Vascular parkinsonism is produced by one or more small strokes that affect the basal ganglia. A stroke is the loss of activity of a discreet brain area (lesion) because of blockage of the blood supply to that brain region. Vascular diseases are associated with a higher prevalence of Parkinson's Disease [1]. There are three different pathologic states that produce Vascular Parkinsonism (VP), including multiple lacunar infarctions in the basal ganglia area [2,3], subcortical arteriosclerotic changes (Binswanger's disease) [2,3] and a single vascular lesion that present a clinical picture indistinguishable from Parkinson's disease [2,3,4]. Parkinson's Disease symptoms occur in Vascular Parkinsonism [5-12]. However, resting tremor is either reduced [5,6], or absent [7,8]. Only a minority, but a large minority, of people with Vascular Parkinsonism respond to L-dopa [9,10].
[1] Archives of Neurology [2006] 63 (5) 717-722 (E.D.Louis, J.A.Luchsinger)
[2] Journal of Neurology [2006] 253 (Supplement 3) iii16-iii21 (K.Fukimoto)
[3] Journal of Neurology [2004] 251 (5) 513-524 (I.Sibon, G.Fenelon, N.P.Quinn, F.Tison)
[4] Journal of Clinical Neuroscience [2001] 8 (3) 268-271 (S.Peters, E.G.Eising, H.Przuntek, T.Muller)
[5] Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao [2005] 25 (7) 868-870 (D.Q.Zhao)
[6] Archives of Neurology [1999] 56 (1) 98-102 (J.Winikates, J.Jankovic)
[7] Acta Neurologica Scandinavica [1992] 86 (6) 588-592 (C.M.Chang, Y.L.Yu, H.K.Ng, S.Y.Leung, K.Y.Fong)
[8] Stroke [1997] 28 (5) 965-969 (H.Yamanouchi, H.Nagura)
[9] Journal of Neurology [2005] 252 (9) 1045-1049 (LRampello, A.Alvano, G.Battaglia, R.Raffaele, I.Vecchio, M.Malaguarnera)
[10] Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Psychiatry [2004] 75 (4) 545-547 (J.C.Zijlmans, R.Katzenschlager, S.E.Daniel, A.J.Lees)
[11] Acta Neurologica Scandinavica [2001] 104 (2) 63-67 (M.Demirkiran M, Bozdemir H, Sarica Y.)
[12] Movement Disorders [1996] 11 (5) 501-508 (J.C.Zijlmans, P.J.Poels, J.Duysens, J.van der Straaten, T.Thien, M.A.van't Hof, H.O.Thijssen, M.W.Horstink) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Tropical cyclones left out of the database
I was wondering, can you show me any systems that look suspect? I've looked at pictures of the September 12,1992 storm, and I believe that it was a hurricane. John Hope said something about it when it happened. The CHC mentions two possible storms in the 2002 season, that brushed Newfoundland. There was one also in 1996, that looked as though it was a full bird TS that passed off of Newfoundland as well. Shearwater912 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
July 2009
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. — (|contribs) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Photos of Kentucky Governors
Any chance you could find a useable one for Edwin P. Morrow, or John L. Helm? I've been looking really hard online, but haven't been able to find anything. Thanks. ''''''talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Why was this paragraph removed? – 01:31, 2004 Jul 16 (UTC)
The highest seasonally cumulative precipitation of snow was measured on Mount Baker, U.S.A during 1998-1999 season when they received 28 meters or 1,140 inches; this surpassed the previous record holder, Mount Rainier, U.S.A which during 1971-1972 season received a thousand inches (25 m) of snow; and the highest daily precipitation was recorded in Colorado, U.S.A in 1921 (1.9 metres , 76 inches). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ok, so I need to find an online article that features her name in it? Do I put the article up on there?
Lastly, when you google Nikki Jane does anything on your computer come up about her being on the Noah's Arc: Jumping the Broom (soundtrack)? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Ok I'm going to reproduce part of my page here again to close this matter. Censoring images in any way is against Wikipedia policies. Any questions? Compromises on Wikipedia policies is not allowed, needless to say. Please stay firm with people who attempt to violate Wikipedia policies. (talk•contribs)
How Wikipedia policies/guidelines may apply to issue of Muhammad's pictures
Wikipedia:Profanity
Words and images that would be considered offensive, profane, or obscene by typical Wikipedia readers should be used if and only if their omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternatives are available. Including information about offensive material is part of Wikipedia's encyclopedic mission; being offensive is not.
Some editors argue that in the light of this guideline:
Typical Wikipedia readers do not find pictures of Muhammad offensive
Exclusion of such pictures would result in the article being less informative, relevant and accurate.
No suitable alternatives are available, as these pictures are historic
As the policy states, ""Including information about offensive material is part of Wikipedia's encyclopedic mission; being offensive is not."". Therefore, the primary mission of Wikipedia and its editors is to improve articles so they are more informative. Being offensive is not Wikipedia's mission.
In addition, there are no issues of copyrights as the copyrights for all these pictures have expired so the images can be used freely where relevant.
WP:NOT#CENSORED
This policy states:
Wikipedia may contain content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive.
Wikipedia cannot guarantee that articles or images are tasteful to all users or adhere to specific social or religious norms or requirements.
Printing Images of Muhammad: A minority tradition?
Some users (Itaqallah and ALM) have suggested that since printing of Muhammad's images has , therefore Wikipedia too should not print the images otherwise it will be a violation of WP:UNDUE. Cartoon images of Muhammad have been printed all over the World and this is not likely to change now:
List of newspapers that reprinted Jyllands-Posten's Muhammad cartoons
Printing of images is no longer a minority tradition and so UNDUE does not apply. (talk•contribs) " | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Idoit
you're a bloody moron. 122.57.32.65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Reason for deletion: page no longer will be needed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Polite to leave link to Larkin with Toads article
Despite the efforts of the anti-Larkin 25 lobby to take down Larkin with Toads, it would be polite (and good faith) to leave the wikilink to Larkin with Toads in the Larkin 25 article. It is still a viable article in its own right and a national art event discussed in the national media so it should not be deleted. It's a keep (as is Larkin 25). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I don't know but they need a current pic. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This is disgusting. They finally stopped harassing me and I thought everything was over then you BAN ME? What the hell are you doing? Why do you side with them? Are these your friends? Also what is the purpose of blocking me when I'm writing anything?????
Jesus fucking christ, wikipedia is getting lower and lower. 93.161.107.169 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Ahhhh
I worked it out, i was editing this page and clicked save instead of preview quite early on, so that error message appeared sayin page delete that page got deleted by the time i had finished but the error message was still in the one i was writing.
So its all fixed now cheers neway. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Well-spoken. But if Darwin had followed it where would we be? I will guard my speech as best I can. I was offended because a 69 year old woman had ridden horseback over a 13,777 foot pass in Kyrgyzstan to find this information and she was being characterized as a meddling dupe by these people whose rice bowl is obviously threatened by what she found. I believe that St. Francis himself would have slapped those people silly. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
I apologize for the above comment. It was not intended as anything other than a respectful request (with the ""Satanist"" comment as a bit of humor). We shall not trouble you further." | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
If you want to know how to do refs, take a look at Baichung Bhutia or one of the current GAs like Fernando Torres. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The list is certainly not all-inclusinve and is not intended to be that. Since your father uses the term, it's likely that others did as well. Often these things are started in or perpetuated by novels and comic books. At any rate, if you could establish that it is a noteworthy nickname, then it'd probably be appropriate to add. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A tag has been placed on Snake Net, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. If you plan to provide more notable material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately, and also put a note on Talk:Snake Net. An administrator should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 1 under Articles. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such material. – (talk) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hi SD, I've briefly looked at the evidence, and it certainly looks plausible. Could I ask you to file a SPI report? Thanks. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Before I revert the changes
I think that the commonscat box looks stupid. carol | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I think you'll appreciate that Breein1007 is infact harrassing me PBS. Please tell me how to file a wiki equivelent of a cease-and-desist/restraining order againt him. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
According to The Royal Shakespeare Company, this is pronounced [TRING-kyu-lo]. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Time to archive?
At 50KB (not including this new section), I was thinking we should probably archive this talk page and start afresh. WP:ARCHIVE suggests a consensus, so here it is. Yay or nay? (t • c)
Good article
Some of the boxes above list Twitter as a ""Start class"" article. Personally I think it's far beyond that. In the Peer review, said that making Twitter a Good article would ""certainly be possible and desirable"". That in mind, should we list Twitter as a Good Article candidate? Also, does anyone think we've missed the Good article criteria and need to do some specific tasks before nominating? (t • c) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
League leader/NFL record markers
Why were those removed from the stats tables? They're still there for, e.g., Peyton Manning. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
And as an addition King Dubya's regime is a fascist one. His take over can be easily compared to Hitler's takeover of the German republic. They are amazingly similar in many ways. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
All enjoyed by Stumbahnfuhrer Garage . as corrupt as you get.
I am not Welsh, nor do I live in Wales. Like reasonable people I don't like racists and neo Nazis like yourself who appear crushingly ignorant of European history and the UK legal system. I, as a former solicitor in the legal aid area, do not suffer such blind ignorance. You make all fair minded people feel sick. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Mr. DVdm, you are the rudest person I've dealt with in some time. Is that a personal attack? If so, report me. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
gay charver that no one likes | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
Gollum
Would you care to join the discussion about which version of English to use at Talk:Gollum. Cheers (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hi, I'm a gay ass guy name Nawlin and I'm a dicklicker that likes to delete stuff he has no business deleting. I really need to get laid. | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Re your message: That won't work. You can't use the existence of the Wikipedia article to establish the phrase's notability. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
That's just silly
my dear, but I promise you to respect this from now on, with a clear opinion about you on my mind: You should never ever represent a collaborative project in any way. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
HAVE THOUSANDS OF IPS, CAN DO THIS ALL DAY
KEBRON HOW IS PAMELA JONES AND BRUCE, IS IBM STILL PAYING YOU FOR LIBELING PEOPLE ONLINE? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
one question
What's with the ""THIS IS CORRECT"" right there in the middle of the article? I was going to remove it but I thought I'd better check it wasn't there for some strange reason....?" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- This is because the traditional view of suicide is one of religious immorality. Philosophy wants to at least explore the reasoning, and if it isn't very good, reject it. If philosophers don't want to advocate suicide they will (or should) come up with good arguments... and they do. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Support Based on what PatGallacher asserts, I can buy that more people are looking for a three-season TV series than for a just-launched comic strip or a TV episode, which are the only other uses with dedicated articles right now (and none of the other uses appear to be contenders, either). | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I think the original explanation was terrible. I also think that the explanation based on g* (E/c^2) makes no sense whatsoever. In effect, it encourages the people that claim that the photons have an equivalent mass m=E/c^2 which is totally wrong. Come to think of it, the whole page misses the fact that current experiments put a limit of 6*10^-17 eV on the photon mass (with newer experiments set to lower this limit). This limit is in total contradiction with any type of E/c^2 derivation. If you don't like my explanation of ""photon in the box"" could you please remove the entry altogether? It is very misleading and badly written as originally set. Thank you
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Good call, changed it but the whole article could use some work | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. talk | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Suggestion Maybe you should include the instructions on this page between tags. -❤T☮C☺M☯ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"==Celtic Language?==
It says in the article that after St. Patrick was captured he began to learn ""the Celtic language."" It is commonly agreed among Irish historians that the Irish are not actually Celtic (e.g. the Irish learned the Celtic style of art from communication with the European mainland, etc.). So did they speak the Celt language? I defer to an expert on this one.
To be more precise, what the article means is that he learned ""a Goidelic language"" or ""the Old Irish language"". Patrick would have already spoken a Brythonic language and some Latin. Depending on exactly where he came from in Britain, he might have known a Goidelic language as well. Celtic languages and Insular Celtic languages explain how Goidelic and Brythonic may have been related to each other and to other Celtic languages. (Talk)
Are you kidding? Please identify your source in claiming that ""is commonly agreed among Irish historians that the Irish are not actually Celtic."" Recent research has revealed that the Celts did not displace pre-celtic peoples but Celts did come to Ireland and the predominant culture remained celtic until English colonization. Second, Gaeilge is a celtic language of the Q-celtic branch of the Celtic language family, thus the Irish of Patrick's day spoke a celtic language and it is assumed that Patrick learned said language. Ergo, he learned a celtic language (though, as noted above, he probably already spoke a P-celtic brythonic language prior to his enslavement.
I have seen broken dates for specific invasions of the British Isles from mainland europe during the collapse of the Roman empire, these not only include Picts, Scots, Irish, Angles and Saxons and more bizzarely English! I will have to dig the book out with dates.
St. Patrick: Fact and Fiction
I have removed 'was captured by Niall Noigiallach' as it is an obvious error. I will try to come back some time in the future and help with citation and new material.
What are the sources for the following statments?
1 - ""born Patricius Magonus Sucatus""
2 - "" seems to have studied at the monastery of Lérins on the Côte d'Azur from 412 to 415 ...He spent the next 15 years at Auxerre were he became a disciple of Saint Germanus of Auxerre and was ordained possibly about 417.""
3 - ""Saint Germanus consecrated Patrick bishop about 431, and sent him to Ireland to succeed Saint Palladius, the first bishop, who had died earlier that year. ""
4 - ""There was some contact with the pope. Patrick visited Rome in 442 and 444. ""
5 - ""Popular devotion to Patrick began in France, long before Sucat received the noble title of Patricius""
These and other statments seriously mar what is otherwise a fairly good and reasonably well written article. Also the chronology implicit in them is all over the place. The fact of the matter is that no one know for sure what the dates of Patrick's life are; those of 461 (arriving in Ireland) and 491 (death) are estimates arrived at only after decades of discussion. Will whoever rewrote this article please show the basis for including these statments. Thank you.
I've re-revised the article again in line with what I wrote above, for the simple reason that Pcassidy reverted back to his version again without citing sources for statments I take issue with. I dislike doing this unilaterally because it is against the spirit of wikipedia, but it seems I have to draw attention to this in some manner other than being polite. , 18:52 pm, 18th April 2005.
I did? Where? I just checked through my edits and all I can find is reverts of blatant vandalism and one weird edit (documented below). I also reverted ""confession"" -> ""confessio"" in the last two weeks or so - is this what you are referring to? - (talk) 18:11, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hello Pete, glad to hear from you. The basic issues I have with the article as you wrote it - forgive me if I have mistaken you for another editor - are outlined above. I have no problem whatsoever with them being included in an article concerning Pat, so long as they are placed under some heading along the lines of ""Speculations about St. Patrick"". Because we know so very little about Patrick I really feel it is vital to seperate facts, speculation and hagiography. And - I mean no offense - much of what I have outlined above falls under the latter two categorys. Thank you for your time. , 22:08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
you will block me you filthy coward who thinks wikipedia is britannica encyclopaedia
in 4 months this site will be banned by US GOVT itself and you will ban me, i will fuck your mom extremely hard.122.161.78.118 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
"
==Baba Yetu==
Hey, thanks for your help! I would have never found out any more info without it. talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fuck You
Nigga, fuck you.
Flocka aint a gangster, so he's not Gangsta rap!
Kids these days are so fucking stupid and mainstream.. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Wikipedia:Peer review/Ananthabhadram
Can you take a look at the article Ananthabhadram put out for a peer review? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.