tcapelle/kaggle-toxic-annotated-filtered · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 6 5k	racial_origin int64 0 3	gender_sex int64 0 3	religion int64 0 3	ability int64 0 3	violence int64 0 3
REDIRECT Talk:Guerillas in the Mist (CSI: Miami)	0	0	0	0	0
'm reverting his edits so fast. He doesn't intend to stop, he's still doing it now. Oh, he's been blocked anyways. No worries. He's made a new account, Wolfgang The Second. No problem. I'll keep you updated. He'll (probably) be gone by 10:15 GMT, since that's when this period ends. Yes, we're in school. Wolfgang The Third is on its way, it seems. Not very original, is he? He's going for a new name, and he's turned his screen away from me....He's also reading everything I do. An idea occurs...Hehe, I just turned off his computer. )	0	0	0	0	1
Edit help on Azeris needed Hello. recommended you as a copyeditor for Azeris which is up for FA. I wrote the article and have also been copyediting it myself, but it's a slow process so I was wondering if you could help out? It shouldn't take long as the article is mostly okay, but there may be things I've missed that you could spot and that would help tremendously. Let me know if you can help. Ciao.	0	0	0	0	0
" Yeah, just saw that Less got him. Sorry I was afk. — ¿? ✍ "	0	0	0	0	0
" Agreed. I have most of my experience in book design (mostly history of ""book design"", pre-Gutenbergian period) and do consider myself only vaguely familiar with web design. But I understand that through history images have posed a problem to ""book designer"". If images exist there (on the page) in their own right and the page is as much an image as a carrier of the text, the layout can be (and usually is) ""creative"". But in such towards written information and legibility orientated enterprises as wikipedia this is not a sensible approach. Furthermore, the images are only thumbs (pointers) and only full size image gives the full impression. So I see no particular reason for playing around with incomplete images what serve only as reference marks. → "	0	0	0	0	0
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of Transformers: Energon episodes. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Talk "	0	0	0	0	1
" In a recent edit, SlimVirgin indicated that the article was ""already too long"", and that some information was ""already mentioned elswhere"". With the evident intent of correcting these problems, she has replaced this: The Israeli foreign ministry says that the West Bank barrier will cause no transfer of population and that none of the estimated 10,000 Palestinians (0.5%) who will be left on the Israeli side of the barrier (based on the February 2005 route) will be forced to migrate.""Humanitarian Aspects: Impact on Palestinians"", Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, July 24, 2006. The barrier has been presented as a reasonable and necessary security precaution to protect Israeli civilians from Palestinian terrorism. Supporters of the barrier consider it to be largely responsible for reducing incidents of terrorism by 90% from 2002 to 2005.Wall Street Journal, ""After Sharon"", January 6, 2006.Not an ""Apartheid Wall""Fence? Security barrier? Apartheid wall? Israel's foreign minister, Silvan Shalom, stated in 2004 that the barrier is not a border but a temporary defensive measure designed to protect Israeli civilians from terrorist infiltration and attack, and can be dismantled if appropriate.""Statement by Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom"", Israeli Foreign Ministry, March 17, 2004. The Supreme Court of Israel ruled that the barrier is defensive and accepted the government's position that the route is based on security considerations. The Supreme Court Sitting as the High Court of Justice Beit Sourik Village Council vs. The Government of Israel and Commander of the IDF Forces in the West Bank.(Articles 28-30) With this: The West Bank barrier, which has also been called the ""apartheid wall"" isolates Palestinian communities in the West Bank and consolidates the annexation of Palestinian land by Israeli settlements. ""Statistics"", B'Tselem, October 2005. The Israeli foreign ministry says that it will cause no transfer of population and that none of the estimated 10,000 Palestinians (0.5%) who will be left on the Israeli side of the barrier (based on the February 2005 route) will be forced to migrate. ""Humanitarian Aspects: Impact on Palestinians"", Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, July 24, 2006. The barrier has been presented as a reasonable and necessary security precaution to protect Israeli civilians from Palestinian terrorism. Supporters of the barrier consider it to be largely responsible for reducing incidents of terrorism by 90% from 2002 to 2005. Wall Street Journal, ""After Sharon"", January 6, 2006.Not an ""Apartheid Wall""Fence? Security barrier? Apartheid wall? Israel's foreign minister, Silvan Shalom, stated in 2004 that the barrier is not a border but a temporary defensive measure designed to protect Israeli civilians from terrorist infiltration and attack, and can be dismantled if appropriate.""Statement by Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom"", Israeli Foreign Ministry, March 17, 2004. The Supreme Court of Israel ruled that the barrier is defensive and accepted the government's position that the route is based on security considerations. The Supreme Court Sitting as the High Court of Justice Beit Sourik Village Council vs. The Government of Israel and Commander of the IDF Forces in the West Bank.(Articles 28-30) She has also replaced this: ''Israel has created separate roads for Israelis and Palestinians. Israeli human rights group B'Tselem said ""Palestinians are barred from or have restricted access to 450 miles of West Bank roads, a system with 'clear similarities' to South Africa's former apartheid regime"".{{cite web \|url=http://www.btselem.org/english/publications/summar	1	0	0	0	1
" You guys can't even agree on how to archive the page??? This is just unreal. I'm going to wait a while and see if I can compromise somehow and get the job done. Do we need to put this to a vote or a strawpoll, hmm?? - ✍ "	0	0	0	0	0
Nuff respect also from me - for your tireless work on the Sarah Palin page.	0	0	0	0	0
Hm...sorry to butt in, but following this logic also means that taking away links is similarly meaningless. If you were to be checking and editing our content, your contribution would be worthwhile - but if you're only removing added links regardless of content...	0	0	0	0	0
Bought Kamagra in the Uk for FREE yes you heard for FREE from http://www.uk-kamagra-viagra.co.uk	0	0	0	0	0
Firstly, the salute the Klan uses is no more 'Nazi' than the Bellamy Salute. Infact, Klansmen have been specifically told to salute with the left arm to further differentiate from the 'Nazi' salute. Furthermore, I have not uploaded photos of any salutes whatsoever! Show me where!	2	0	0	0	0
" No, he's agreeing with the fact that the singer and teh movie actreess are not given precedence over the religious figure and the historical figure based on movie/Cd consumption, and compraing to this debate here. '''' (cricket calendar poll!'') "	0	0	0	0	0
" Your block to the ""Rachael Ray"" editor UGH! How dare you block the sacred one who willingly and justly defames Rachael Ray. I have met Rachael Ray and she is the dark one! You must reconsider your horrid actions or the syncrogryph of the fifth apocryphal will reign down upon your hairs with the might of 1000 horses!"	0	0	0	0	2
This page is getting repeatedly changed by Bhramins( upper castes) who have an ulterior motive in covering up the opression of lower castes. I have reversed the anti quota POV and pro Bhramin POV from modern developments	1	0	0	0	1
Image requested\|people of Kansas\|American football people}} {{	0	0	0	0	0
, but everyone does hear things different!	0	0	0	0	0
" Nothing of the sort - Sumple and I are merely trading ""Quotes of the moment"". It just so happens that one of us was much more quote-worthy than the other. "	0	0	0	0	0
James Randi and truth. Sorry. That's like matter and anti-matter. But since we can't mass produce or yet mine anti-matter, and Randi will never be anywhere close to the truth, there will be no explosion. So his behind will still be there for you. Pucker up Randi-boy.	0	1	0	0	1
entitled to remove the comment which I have done so leave it be.	0	0	0	0	0
" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Killing Floor (2009 video game). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. clamation point "	0	0	0	0	0
":::: There should be some priomordial quality mandate. Wikipedia should want quality verifiable references. If [WP:VER] is intended to be weaponized then a bot could be made that deletes pages and sections based on whether the section contains an insufficiently prestigious reference. Treating WP:VER as an intentional algorithm would allow an attacker to delete perhaps as high as 90% of wikipedia without even needing to look at the content. No one could invoke any objection to the mass deletion if the literal interpretation of WP:VER is the most important rule on wikipedia. Vandalism becomes impossible if criteria for removal applied to a science page can be robotically applied to a philosophy page. The above attack would meet a common sense interpretation of vandalism. The only possible protection from the mass deletion attack is if [WP:VAN] is considered to have higher priority for literal interpretation than WP:VER. There should already be a common sense acceptance that Vandalism is more dangerous and objectively assessed than the quality of referenced material, and as shown above, rejecting the statement binds wikipedia to a suicide pact. Its my view that the recent deletions are indistinguishable from robotic vandalism and they deleted high quality and verifiable references based only on the content hosting platform. If Vandalism and Verifiability are to be equally considered in actions, then restoring the content and tagging it as needing better sources should be done. Also if there is to be a defense from robotic deletion of the majority of wikipedia, then ""deletors"" that have shown no previous contribution to the page should be treated more suspiciously than those who have helped build it. "	0	0	0	0	1
good find. I removed the part about MC Mystic's complaint but added that rolling stone article. I think someone should rephrase everthing now	0	0	0	0	0
" This is childlish: First of all, I am tired of people who show up to a page and think they have the right to add any modifications they feel like. Next time, before you have the intentions of modifying the alticle considerably (or the contents in this case) it would be wise to write down something in the discussion page, otheriwse you work might end up being in vane. Secondly, the tempalte for the content is BY FAR THE UGLIEST I have ever seen. It quite hard for a newcomer to realize he has got to look through the text. The old content probably wasn't the best possible, but was significantly better. Also, the old content is not occupied by history in more than 50%. I understand Romania has a rich history, but the notion of independence was not a huge idea before 1800s. India has existed as a 'culture' long before the Roman Empire, therefore there is no point in comapring the importance of the history section of the two countries. Check the Germany article to see the model I have edited the format of the history section. You are welcome to edit the history section, but do not add 20 entries about history in the contents section (i.e.: that is why national awakening, independence and union are in the same section; feel free to modify the name, but do not further split it). Also, for similar reasons, there is little point in expanding the section about Dacia. I might be worong, but you seem to play around a lot with the position of the images. Please do not. Right now they are placed where they are because of some specific reasons. I will add more comment later Now the answers: You are welcome. Next time you add about 30k+ of information to an article and somebody comes and starts freaking with the article, you will be really happy. Appearance and professional looking? Is that what you are calling the template for the contents section? Come on, try to be objective and agrre that even the contents section on the present page is really ugly. I have allready replied to this and I do not feel the need to throw away some of my time to add more reasoning to this rather retarded dispute. Note: The big size also has a real outcome, and that is the article is really annoying to edit because it takes almost 10secs between the press of the save button and the reloading of the page (and it is not my connection) Again I allready explained this. The issue was not the byte count but the length of the contents section that took several pages to scroll down (and I think more than hald of the contents were SMALL entries into the history section). The article is about Romania, not about the History of Romania. Again feel free to click this link and edit. The history is there, it happened, and therefore the history ARTICLE should be expanded. ""(some of us hate to change pages!)"" Some other readers hate to search stuff about Romania and have to scroll down through pages of history to get to some more present facts."" Putting links is not equivilent to giving a reader a recap of the era—in particular, I find the way you did it in that page to be poorly prioritized."" This is your opinion. The page has beeen previously reviewed by other users (check the article milistone) and they found it actually really aggreable and felt the need to specify the usefulness of the way it was 'prioritizied'. For exampel in Europa Yearbook (a kind of printed version of CIA Factbook that is printed yearly). Also, your example with journals is at least annoying. Journals are actually reviewed by professionals, which means that people who nt what is happening agree on those formalities. This is not Libertatea where you need to put catchy titles to make people buy your crap. This is an encyclopaedia and should have some professionalism in the way titles are given. I checked and decided the contents section is REAAAAALLY ""off-putting"". It is unfortunate, but I find it fair to undo edits from people who do not ask first, than to reedit their edits. IT IS UGLY!!!!!! Also, what browsers? Anything that is not Firefox or IE has no weight. (i.e. even Opera is a niche browser) Also, I did not get the joke about first of July. If you were refering to the date I have created this account, then... you are at least superficial to base your opinions on that. There are al least two possibilities that you cannot prove with this kind of research: 1) that I did not have another account before then. 2) that I did not do real publishing in real life (i.e. in real Journals, were people review your stuff before publishing) Cheers and have fun at not modifying the contents section in a way allready described why not to. "	0	0	0	0	1
Moving comment There was already a Warnings section with the date of your warning so I popped it in there for neatness and to group them together. Please move it back if you like.	0	0	0	0	0
What about use in other langueges? What about use in other langueges, i.e. in Chinese?	0	0	0	0	0
Template policy discussion You are invited to help consider a common template policy for all WP:SPORTS biography articles at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sports#Template_policy_discussion. (T/C//WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)	0	0	0	0	0
2007 (UTC) Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 17:43, 1 March	0	0	0	0	0
" You are featured on encyclopediadramatica I hope you don't shoot the messenger, but I thought you should know... I went to that site and your article on that site is now the front page article. Unfortunately, my dear Kirk, MONGO is well aware of it, just like we his friends are. Some people, like those who made that article at ED, should really get a life instead of insulting and ridiculing good people and valued contributors, don't you think... ♥ tell me - Thanks, Phaedriel. It never ceases to amaze me how people can be so rude from afar. I've removed the links to that site from my page. Ah, look at it this way; as long as whatever fool did this is busy with rubbish like this, they can't be vandalising our project. You know what's fun about ED articles about Wikipedia users? THey're good at keeping track of personal attacks, like the one I just reverted -) Happy editing! (Karwynn) "	0	0	0	0	0
" You might be interested in this Locked Article... ...and pro-RAO vandalism as noted on Talk page: [Talk:Recent_African_origin_of_modern_humans] (removal of {cn} request tags, etc...as I noted removing tags was a vandalism problem also in the [Multiregional] article) as well as possible POV reasons why it's not being updated to reflect sources showing Chris Stringer now doubting RAO more ...plus tonight I added that the SAME anthropologists' book, who were used in the lede because they USED TO BE saying that RAO is the ""mainstream"" hypothesis, is a book that now withdrew that claim and says multiregional gained ""support"" over the formerly-dominant RAO hypothesis. As it's a locked article, I can't edit it (I guess there's a waiting-period or I'd need to edit 10, 20, 50, or ??? articles before I get permission as a New USer to edit a Locked Article?). Thanks. 209.97.203.60 "	0	0	0	0	0
" Tajik, for the sake of constructiveness, give up on ""YOU"" in capital letters or insults/attacks. The same accusations that you bring up against me above of allegedly ""hating Persians"", I can say exactly about you towards Turks. The fact is, you have been arguing all along trying to remove every single reference to word Turkic in the article, and that's not the way it will be. Safavids were Turkic-speaking dynasty of Iran, that came to power with help of Qizilbash Turkic tribes, their founder wrote in Turkic language and used it as official language of his court. So, until you accept these basics, there will no consensus. "	1	0	0	0	0
Reversion Seat > See Reverted change of See to Seat: bishops properly do have a See ~ • Talk + new	0	0	0	0	0
, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Beja hey? Hotbed of football pride or just another city of SLB/SCP fans? 23:09	0	0	0	0	0
Why not just name the article Mega Drive which would support a world wide view on the subject instead of teaming up and being bias Americans? then the page would not need protecting as everyone would be happy, except you bias Americans... 82.41.107.134	2	0	0	0	0
Caribbean Assessments Oh, have I worked with assessments. About ten thousand or so. Yeah, I was anticipating that this project would do them as well. Right now, I'm trying to reorganize the Geographical section of the Project Directory for cleaner, smaller breakdowns, and will hopefully be setting up the assessment page either this afternoon or tomorrow.	0	0	0	0	0
" 1820 Map vs Globe The image in the infobox should be a geographic locator as well, showing where the state is within a larger context of the world. It doesn't seem consistent with map of other Chinese dynasty articles (e.g. Ming, Tang, etc). Geographic locator map is mainly used for current country map (not historical map), e.g. People's Republic of China, United States, etc The Qing Dynasty, although is a dynasty of the past, is also largely a modern political entity, and its history is intertwined with modern world history. That's why I think a geographic locator is better suited, as it also mirrors the Republic of China (1912-1949) article. Another thing to consider is that because there are so many contemporaneous maps of the Qing that's available (where as such maps are rare for prior historic dynasties, such as Ming and Tang), it is difficult to choose one that truly represent the whole article in the infobox. I agree that showing all the different maps of the Qing Dynasty at its various extent and time periods is informative to readers, but they don't have to be in the infobox; a general geographic locator is a good fit there. Plus, the maps of the Qing Dynasty at 1820 and 1833 are already in the article. 上海\沪\滬\Shanghai I am not going to respond in full at the moment, as I would like to sleep. I will, however, return to it when I feel like it (a few hours at the very least). so where should I respond? my page or yours? (TALK) Equal Standards TheLeopard, I thank your for your unending quest for the truth, and your campaigning for the integrity of Wikipedia. However, there are other areas of Wikipedia that would greatly profit from similar vigor. Take for instance the previously widely unknown National Capital Region (China). You rescued it from obscurity caused by a redirect. However, it must have escaped you that this article does not contain a single reference, and that there are several claims and outright speculations that deserve at least a dubious tag. A National Capital Region (China) is worthy of the same attention to detail as China’s capital, or other cities such as Shanghai. While it is the job of the author to provide these references (lest the author would risk a deletion), the lack of verifiable sources should at least have been pointed out. I have done so in the meantime. Thank you The only reason I rescued that article was because it was redirected to Bohai Economic Rim, which clearly is not the same thing as National Capital Region. The article needs to be tagged with ""unreferenced"" and a bunch of other tags. Beijing I know we've had some issues before, but I have to commend you for the Beijing edits. I wanted to make the same, but didn't dare. Thank you. You are now a Reviewer Hello. Your account has been granted the ""reviewer"" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010. Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Alternate term in lede section of Standard Mandarin Hi, TheLeopard, I hope you've seen by now the new section I opened in ar	0	0	0	0	0
" Made in the USA? http://rexcurry.net/wikipedialies.html There are some regular writers on Wikipedia who knowingly engage in personal attacks and deletions (even of links) of anyone who explains the connection between Edward Bellamy and his cousin Francis Bellamy (author of the pledge of allegiance) and National Socialism. It is behavior that breaks Wikipedia's rules. What kind of people cover-up for Nazis and that horrid ideology? Many regular writers on Wikipedia are lying liars and the lies they tell include the top media cover-ups. They cover up many historic photos of the Pledge of Allegiance http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html that reveal its original straight-arm salute. They cover up the fact that the author of the Pledge of Allegiance (Francis Bellamy), and his cousin and cohort (Edward Bellamy), were National Socialists and supported the ""Nationalism"" movement, the ""Nationalist"" magazine, the ""Nationalist Educational Association,"" their dogma of ""military socialism,"" and Edward inspired the ""Nationalist Party."" They cover up the Pledge's straight-arm salute as the origin http://rexcurry.net/pledge1.html of the salute of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazis). As part of the cover up, they perpetuate the myth http://rexcurry.net/pledgesalute.html that the straight-arm salute was from ancient Rome. They cover up discoveries by the historian Rex Curry. The Pledge began with a military salute that then stretched outward toward the flag. Historic photographs are at http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html and at http://rexcurry.net/pledge_military.html showing the evolution of the gesture. Due to the way that both gestures were used, the military salute led to the Nazi salute. The Nazi salute http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html is an extended military salute. A mnemonic device is the swastika (""Hakenkreuz"" in German). Although the swastika was an ancient symbol, it was also used sometimes by German National Socialists to represent ""S"" letters for their ""socialism."" Hitler altered his own signature http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-swastika.html to use the same stylized ""S"" letter for ""socialist."" Wikipedia's liars cover up for the swastika http://rexcurry.net/swastikanews.html and its use as a sick socialist symbol. Wikipedia's liars cover up for the National Socialist German Worker's Party http://rexcurry.net/swastikamedia.html by overuse of the hackneyed shorthand ""Nazi."" Many Wikipedia posters are liars in that there was no ""Nazi Party"" because it was actually the ""National Socialist German Workers' Party"" and the party members did not call themselves ""Nazis"" nor the ""Nazi Party."" The term ""Nazi"" developed from slang using the first syllable in the German pronunciation of the ""National Socialist German Workers' Party."" In that sense, the author of the Pledge of Allegiance was a ""Nazi"" too, in that the term means ""National Socialist."" The term ""Nazi"" is also used to hide the National Socialist dogma behind the Pledge of Allegiance, its original gesture, and the National Socialist German Workers' Party. Wikipedia's liars use the term ""Nazi"" and the misnomer ""Nazi Party"" to cover-up the horrors of socialism. Wikipedia's liars cover up the the socialist trio of atrocities and and their socialist Wholecaust (of which the Holocaust was a part): 62 million people were slaughtered under the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics; 35 million were slaughtered under the Peoples' Republic of China; 21 million were slaughtered under the National Socialist German Workers' Party. They cover up the fact that socialists helped start WWII with the National Socialist German Workers' Party and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics together http://rexcurry.net/socialistwar.html as allies in 1939. They cover up for and are deniers of the socialist Wholecaust, http://rexcurry.net/mediacoverup.html of which the monstrous Holocaust was a part. Liars on Wikipedia repeat common lies http://rexcurry.net/mediapledge.html of the media. http://rexcurry.net/socialistmedia.html Wikipedia should not be cited for support because it is no different than quoting various anonymous sources who have no knowledge of the topic http://rexcurry.net/wikipedialies.html or who have lies to spread about the topic. The Wikipedia article for the ""Roman salute"" used to be complete disinformation, deliberately maintained by liars who tried to perpetuate myths. Here is an excerpt of what Wikipedia used to carry: ""The Roman salute is a closed finger, flat-palm-down hand raised at an angle (usually 45 degrees) and was used by the Roman Republic. It was also the historical civilian salute of the United States, from 1787?-1934?, known since 1892 as the Bellamy salute. It was also the historical salute among armies of the Middle East and South America. When the Nazi party o	2	0	0	0	2
" Hello, , and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! talk Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility"	0	0	0	0	0
" Thanks Random. I agree that that is a better approach, because it lets us de-couple the link text from the link. But in this case I think the redirects are legitimate, and it is good to point into the list via them as they insulate the template against any change in target. i.e. if someone creates an article on an R-phrase, the redirect can be re-targetted. If we were linking directly into the list, we'd be stuffed. Bryan, if you prefer the tooltip to say ""Explosive when dry"" rather than ""R1: Explosive when dry"", you could change from [[{{{2}}}: {{{1}}}\|{{{2}}}]] to [[{{{2}}}: {{{1}}}\|{{{2}}}]] Hesperian "	0	0	0	0	0
" Fair use rationale for Image:Smurf1.gif Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Smurf1.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 1 != 2 "	0	0	0	0	0
Integration branch? Wha? I have no idea what you mean. talk - contribs	0	0	0	0	0
" question Usually there's a little infobox at the bottom of the page where I can rate & comment on the article's content. I found this to be a pretty informative article, so, naturally, I wanted to give it a solid 5 stars. Unfortunately, I was unable to find this application on this page, is this due to a technical error? _friend "	0	0	0	0	0
Huggle 3 Hey Deathlaser! I am Petrb, one of core developers of Huggle, the antivandalism tool, which you are beta testing (according to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers). I am happy to announce that Huggle 3 is ready for some testing. You can read more about it at WP:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta. Please keep in mind that this is a development version and it is not ready for regular use. That means you must: Watch your contribs - when anything happens you didn't want, fix it and report a bug Frequently checkout source code and build latest version, we change it a lot If you find any problem with a feature that is supposed to work perfectly, please let us know. Some features are not ready yet, it is listed in known problems on Huggle3 beta page, you don't need to report these - we know it! So, that's it. Have fun testing and please let us know about any problems, either using bugzilla @ http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/ or . Please respond to my talk page, I am not going to watch your talk page. Thank you	0	0	0	0	0
Yes, the article is great now, i'll change my vote. What a coincidence, I just finnished reading the article. 23:57, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
Go ahead and talk to the admins. You are a personal friend of Mitchell's and I can prove it. Stop editing the article per COI.	0	0	0	0	0
Well in this case the stuff he keeps deleting is not a direct copy, it is a paraphrase. Also articles that are direct copies and then just in quotes get speedy deleted. 23:38, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)	0	0	0	0	0
happy October 2014 everyone. hope its a good October 2014 for everyone.	0	0	0	0	0
" Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — talk "	0	0	0	0	0
Aside from that which anyone deserves, respect	0	0	0	0	0
" ""oo9"", if you have ANY actual evidence, show it. You claim something found on May 23, 2013 - I can find no links that back you up. Either come up with evidence or go away you trolling little tea retard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.236.94 "	0	0	0	2	2
Eric_Kandel I noticed you added content to the page of Eric_Kandel. I created a page on the neuropsyhotherapist Fred M. Levin. Levin is a fan of Kandel's work. Unfortunately, the page on Levin is up for deletion. I am not asking you to vote. But perhaps you can check the Levin page to add some info. mwalla	0	0	0	0	0
":::::Nope. That discussion some months ago reached the end of the consensus process (namely, ""Find a reasonable (if temporary) compromise"", which at that time was non-inclusion). We are now at the beginning of a new consensus cycle. '''''' [ contribs ] "	0	0	0	0	0
" I checked what links here and found Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive105#Block for review: ""I've preemptively blocked . See for background. I'd appreciate it if someone gave this a second look. ∇∆∇∆ ""Looks good to me. That's a hell of a find. talk ""Absolutely a good call. ""Appreciate that action "" (Brief WP:ANI discussion blockquoted above.) — ✉ "	0	0	0	0	0
"Thank you for the refs on Scott Owens (poet)! — X S G "	0	0	0	0	0
Thank you very much for the kind welcome. I've been reading Wikipedia as an unregistered user for a couple of years. At first I was a bit of an 'Encyclopedia snob'; over time, I've come to appreciate Wikipedia as a useful and enjoyable resource. I've been lurking as a registered user for a little bit, and after trying my hand at some small edits, felt it was time to contribute a bit more. I very much appreciate the references you provided. I'll read them as a first step in my education here. I'll also continue to look at existing pages for inspiration and example. Your user page is certainly impressive to me - I'll be sure to use it, and other such pages, as inspiration when I update mine in the future. Kindest regards,	0	0	0	0	0
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.	0	0	0	0	0
No such polls exist and there is nothing in Wikipedia policy to suggest they are necessary.	0	0	0	0	0
" Alright, I am willing to concede that the CIA allegations are flimsy at best, therefore, I will stop the edit warring. While you may not consider it too important, I think the issue of Assange as the founder to be another example of lazy journalism. Your source for Assange as founder of Wikleaks was MSNBC.com. I don't necessarily consider MSNBC to be a reliable source most of the time. Corporate news does not do ""real"" journalism. They copy news from one source or they make stories up. It seems to me that the idea of Assange as founder is a meme. I have never read a quote from Assange whereby he states that he founded Wikileaks. This idea seems to be mostly promulgated by the U.S. corporate media. Perhaps to vilify him in the minds of Americans, so that later he can be lynched. This seems like Propaganda 101 to me. The Wikileaks site does not identify Assange as the founder. Where is the evidence? THC Loadee 04:08, 4 MARCH 2011 (UTC)"	0	0	0	0	1
Phase two of the war on schumin We are entering into phase 2 of the war on Schumin. The Wikipedia Reform Trust is resolved to force user:Schuminweb to recognise me in an edit summary. We are issuing amnesty's to all innocent parties in the hope that they may persuade user:Schuminweb to come around to a reasonable settlement. You can help us achieve this. All he has to do is recognise me in an edit summary. Easy, innit! 86.40.214.4	0	0	0	0	1
What, I never agreed with you. You clearly know nothing about baseball or you do not understand English. I am just glad you don't live in this country because people like you don't belong. I am making your day? HAHA, you are a sad sad human being.	2	0	0	0	1
" On the subject of English National Opera, tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=en:English_National_Opera is reporting a lot of deadlinks, and I thought I'd try to fix them. Some might just be temporary problems (The Independent?) but the Gramophone ones seem to be dead permanently since they've switched to a new fee-based archive and retired their previous archive. A search for a few sample ones using the ""Wayback Machine"" brings no joy. Any thoughts? Talk "	0	0	0	0	0
We can agree on one thing: the numbers do speak for themselves. The fact that they seem to be saying something else to you than to me, and some sources, is irrelevant.	0	0	0	0	0
Hi alsion could you please explain the nessage you left ?	0	0	0	0	0
" A ""warning"" by another editor. But, who polices Blocking? Is it like grafitti? Anyone can do it? Can it be done on a whim? Can someone block another because Gamaliel, with the back of his hand to his forhead, claims harassment? Look before you leap Here is some examples of ""Gamaliel's"" editing work. Perhaps Bishonen should block Gamaliel: 2-26-2006 Gamaliel said an editor was ""pushing disproved chin nonsense AGAIN"" 2-24-2006 Gamaliel said ""oh lord not the mauser and the big chin nonsense again"" 2-17-2006 Gamaliel said another editor was being ""quite obnoxious."" 2-16-2006 Gamaliel said an editor was making ""an absurd claim."" 1-30-2006 Gamaliel said an editor wanted ""to insert conspiracy nonsense into the article."" 1-24-2006 Gamaliel called an editor's information ""rambling, barely coherent rants."" 1-19-2006 Gamaliel refered to an editor's position as ""your ridiculous objections."" 1-12-2006 Gamaliel said he was going to remove ""this Mauser nonsense."" 1-2-2006 Gamaliel said that a contribution ""is nuts."" 12-31-2006 Gamaliel decided someone's edits ""were a mess."" 9-21-2006 Gamaliel accused an editor of ""offensive amateur analysis."" "	0	0	0	0	2
you were wrong to delete Diahn williams. Acting in the Andy Griffin show and kissing Don Knotts makes her a notable person.	0	0	0	0	0
" Courtesy Hi, Malke ... in case you miss it, I left a note for you in my section at the Doc James arb case request. Best regards, (Talk) "	0	0	0	0	0
" Re Timbouctou You've been mentioned on an ANI thread I posted , hope you don't mind. It concerns (TALK) "	0	0	0	0	0
" Sir Henry Russell, 1st Baronet Suggest merging Sir Henry Russell, 1st Baronet here. No evidence that he meets WP:POLITICIAN or any other part of WP:BIO, or the WP:GNG. His claim to notability is having been chief justice of Bengal, and it may be that more sources can be found to establish his notability, but so far there is no evidence of the required significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. (talk) • (contribs) "	0	0	0	0	0
You know what he'll say. NOW this discussion is over. HA!	0	0	0	0	1
okay why not ask wil wheaton yourself.tell him about the uncyclopedia on wil wheaton	0	0	0	0	0
" Well, totaly diferent is that the term as it uses the name macedonia within it refers to Macedonian (as you want) political influence, and there is no need for a ""google site"", it refers to something macedonian, and implicating bulgarian POV makes the statements in the artical unrelevant, but if you want so, continue to do it, cose I give up, you have google here to be the smartest, congratulations. (not everithing is written ""on"" internet). 00:00,14 June 2006 (UTC)"	1	0	0	0	1
YOU TOO JEFF G, FUCKIN HOMOS.	0	3	0	0	1
create an account.	0	0	0	0	0
This message is regarding the page Christopher murt. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. t • @	0	0	0	0	0
" Apology accepted and no hard feelings! Regards, 13:58:33, 2005-08-24 (UTC)"	0	0	0	0	0
1. You are lying. Post the sentence where it says 33 million if you are not lying. 2. You are violating your topic ban by being here, and if you do not leave, I will report your malfeasance and have you permanently banned. 3. The Kleck study is 20 years old and based on discredited methodology. It honestly should not even be in the article. You are embarrassing yourself by fawning over it.	0	0	0	0	1
" I couldn't help noticing that Stucky and Stravinsky both start with ""St"" and end with ""ky"". Coincidence? Maybe. -) "	0	0	0	0	0
" Article name Why is it in Italics? It should be changed. Holla at me! "	0	0	0	0	0
":::: To User:Sennen goroshi: Well, you could have at least used terms such as bullcrap, horsecrap, cowcrap, or any other less offending words than ""bullst"", whatever the lame drama you witnessed. And you just said ""a single fking word""...Do you feel like a grown man when you use that kind of language? There could be some children refering to Wikipedia for his/her homework, and I don't want them to learn foul languages here. I do not know what this ""wikilawyering"" that I have supposed to be doing according to you. I only could find that it is a pejorative term. Could you explain to me, an ignorant user who is new to Wikipedia, that exactly what behavior of mine is ""wikilawyering""? Why do you have to say things like ""just to shut you up"", or ""you would waste so much of the other editors' time""? You are hurting my feelings. It is uncalled for. I am a delicate, sensitive guy -_-. ""Wikipedia articles are made by editors gaining consensus - this process is something that you do not seem to have any respect for"". - Have a look at the policy: Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion. You say ""this process is something that you do not seem to have any respect for"", but notice that I am the one who officially started a consensus-gathering effort at , and you have not even participated in it. Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars! What a valuable piece of information that I have not noticed. So what? I don't see this discussion included in that category. By saying that, you are not offending every editors who participated in and worked hard for this discussion, are you? "	0	1	0	0	1
Your disgusting personal habits aside,	0	0	0	0	1
Ancient Greek sites in Serbia Hi! I have two questions about Niš and Lebane. Regards,	0	0	0	0	0
":::::Reviewing your edit history, the words ""pot"" and ""kettle"" are the best I can come up with in response to that! "	0	0	0	0	0
":Hah. Actually, I think on topic. This is completely unfounded right now. From the page: ""As you know the Nintendo Wii is heavily based on the Gamecube. It's very easy already to run Linux under a Gamecube so it should also work on the Nintendo Wii. While is not ready yet, it should see the light very soon."" Yeah, all he has to do is break the copyright protection, find out how the hardware has changed from the Gamecube, compensate for said changes, and so on. It's non-new right now. "	0	0	0	0	0
Necrometics is run by a librarian, it is not a reliable source. The World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators Which issue? This has been in print since 1963. Rummel's book is not peer reviewed and his figures and methods are heavily critiqued. I will look at Obermeyer now, majority of sources I have read on this say 3million killed.	0	0	0	0	0
Not all languages have their proto- counterpart.	0	0	0	0	0
Oh shut up Bong, your deleting for your fun god damnit	0	0	0	0	1
" The web statistics are not that easy to interpret. Most visitors to his sites will be from academia, because non-academics are not interested in the intricacies of physics at an advanced level. Many of those visits are simply due to curiosity; e.g., I go to his website often to find out what more ""nonsense"" and fantastic claims he has put up there. Over a decade, I have told many colleagues about his activities, and they too must visit his websites occasionally. How do you think that knowledge about his research is so widespread that all reputable journals have shunned his work? Now, it is true that some B.Sc.'s would be impressed by him; however, for their doctoral degrees their work would have to satisfy at least academics with Ph.D.s. Note his insulting manner. He wrote four unsolicited e-mails to M.N.J. Singh. When Singh replied, he accused Singh of being a felon, etc. Just as an experiment, take up a false identity through Yahoo and then send amild note casting doubt on ECE theory to Evans. See how he blasts and insults your assumed persona, including calling you a ""cyber-terrorist"". "	0	0	0	0	1
I will deal with your input above but desist from calling me by that name. I understand you've been doing this on other sites in the Wikipedia system. You are a frustrated man and I think we should meet to discuss this problem you have with me as Pakhtun Tanoli. Is it because other Pakhtuns have been challenging you after my contributions to the debate regarding Pakhtun status of Tanolis. You've have been peddling this name about on different sites in Wikipedia and I've left it for proud Pakhtuns and others to challenge you. Get it into your ignorant head that Tanolis are Pakhtuns and Janjuas are kasbis (I know at least 3 families of Janjua origin who do not claim to rajputs but say they are of Maliyar caste. None of the historical sources link them with rajputs. Ghakhars use the title raja but are not rajputs as do the Turks of Hazara, in Manakrai,and they are not rajputs either - read about Raja of Mahmoodabad. Moreover, the real Rajputs of Rajputana use the universal title of Singh to denote their proud identity (the term raja is reserved for the rulers). As for the Gujjar issue it is well documented that Jat, Gujjar and the so-called rajputs of northern Punjab are the same people. This leads to the conclusion that maybe the Janjua claim to be rajput is suspect as I have said all along. Darbar-e-Akbari, Tuzuk-e-Jahangiri and other historical works do not mention Janjuas and Rajputs together and locate the former in Bhir far away from Hazara, and more importantly, from real Rajputs as well. I accept there are people who live in Tanawal and use Tanoli as their geographical origin but they do not fit into the clan system of the original Tanawalis. We know who the gujjar families are in Tanawal and they do not use Tanoli for themselves though they do say they reside in Tnawal. Other Gujjars in Hazara are either settled or are move about between Swat, Upper hazara and Azad Kashmir. Additionally, you seem to be on a mission to prove something that is not proveable. I know you are in the UK and I can meet you face to face to discuss this if you prefer. We can sort a number of things relevant to this debate as well as you can know who I really am. (User: Pakhtun Tanoli - 11:41	2	0	0	0	1
" RE: Apology, No worries I hope you didn't read my comment as rude, I certainly did not intend it as such, but simply a quick explanation for why I had removed your template, and reverted your changes. It is just that when an editor who has been established for many years finds a template threatening to block them on their page, it is not likely to get a good response. If my response was harsh, I apologize, but you should always check to see who you are templating if they are not an IP, and if they are established, it is always best to simply leave a note requesting more information, rather than a harsh template. I hope you understand, and no worries. Ariel♥Gold "	0	0	0	0	0
" Bladesmulti Dear you stated that the sources were unreliable. I have provided 6 books with verifiable tracking info: isbn, publishing house, date and author These l books are by Islamic scholars such as Sa'id Akhtar Rizvi, Abul A'la Maududi, Ehsan Elahi Zaheer and others I have also included an Islamic Encyclopaedia as reference: http://www.amazon.in/The-Everything-Understanding-Islam-Book-ebook/dp/B001OLRLAQ I have also included direct sources where the qutotations can be read such as: I will die either in Mecca or Medina.Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Tadhkirah, Page 784}} You stated that alislam.org ""unreliable"". The website ""alislam.org"" is the main and official page of the Ahamadi religion. References: 2, 7, 24, 30, 35, 37, 40, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55,69, 74, 80 are all from this website in the this article."	0	0	1	0	0
Is there a way to have a solid, progressive discussion concerning this article and once and for all get it resolved?	0	0	0	0	0
Health He was really fat. No shocker he died.69.243.42.251	0	0	0	1	0
" Erm, the lead image is supposed to be illustrative, which it is, as it illustrates a brassiere quite clearly, and it's not needlessly overly sexualized, consistent with the encyclopedic tone of the article. Whether or not the woman is ""good looking"" is irrelevant; the picture serves its purpose. ✽ "	0	2	0	0	0
Warnings from administrators can be listed on the bottom of the case page of the closed arbitration, along with blocks, bans, or restrictions, so that the admins on arbitration enforcement can keep track. Regards,	0	0	0	0	0
WikiProject Pennsylvania Thank you very much for your contributions, but in the future, could you please sign your messages with four tildes? You're talking to a robot.	0	0	0	0	0
Hi Sukh I've compacted the section to a appropriate size.	0	0	0	0	0
I'm still in the process of perfecting this page. I'll be adding footnotes tomorrow.	0	0	0	0	0
Recent changes In light of the most recent EastEnders episode, changes have to be made because the template has got mistakes. Firstly, Kirsty Branning is a new character (who is permanent) and needs to be on the template. Derek Branning needs to be removed and placed in 'past characters'. In addition, to that I would like to request that I have powers to change the family trees seeing as you seem not to be doing that role which means we have three inaccurate family trees and I have been reminding you about for a while. If you cannot do, I would be prepared to. Enjoy Boxing Day!86.169.235.148	0	0	0	0	0
Voice actors Voice actors do not appear to be listed. Anyone who knows any, please add them.	0	0	0	0	0
Pussy pelmet...I'm having this deja-vu feeling...	0	1	0	0	0

REDIRECT Talk:Guerillas in the Mist (CSI: Miami)

0

'm reverting his edits so fast. He doesn't intend to stop, he's still doing it now. Oh, he's been blocked anyways. No worries. He's made a new account, Wolfgang The Second. No problem. I'll keep you updated. He'll (probably) be gone by 10:15 GMT, since that's when this period ends. Yes, we're in school. Wolfgang The Third is on its way, it seems. Not very original, is he? He's going for a new name, and he's turned his screen away from me....He's also reading everything I do. An idea occurs...Hehe, I just turned off his computer. )

0

1

Edit help on Azeris needed Hello. recommended you as a copyeditor for Azeris which is up for FA. I wrote the article and have also been copyediting it myself, but it's a slow process so I was wondering if you could help out? It shouldn't take long as the article is mostly okay, but there may be things I've missed that you could spot and that would help tremendously. Let me know if you can help. Ciao.

0

" Yeah, just saw that Less got him. Sorry I was afk. — ¿? ✍ "

0

" Agreed. I have most of my experience in book design (mostly history of ""book design"", pre-Gutenbergian period) and do consider myself only vaguely familiar with web design. But I understand that through history images have posed a problem to ""book designer"". If images exist there (on the page) in their own right and the page is as much an image as a carrier of the text, the layout can be (and usually is) ""creative"". But in such towards written information and legibility orientated enterprises as wikipedia this is not a sensible approach. Furthermore, the images are only thumbs (pointers) and only full size image gives the full impression. So I see no particular reason for playing around with incomplete images what serve only as reference marks. → "

0

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of Transformers: Energon episodes. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Talk "

0

1

" In a recent edit, SlimVirgin indicated that the article was ""already too long"", and that some information was ""already mentioned elswhere"". With the evident intent of correcting these problems, she has replaced this: The Israeli foreign ministry says that the West Bank barrier will cause no transfer of population and that none of the estimated 10,000 Palestinians (0.5%) who will be left on the Israeli side of the barrier (based on the February 2005 route) will be forced to migrate.""Humanitarian Aspects: Impact on Palestinians"", Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, July 24, 2006. The barrier has been presented as a reasonable and necessary security precaution to protect Israeli civilians from Palestinian terrorism. Supporters of the barrier consider it to be largely responsible for reducing incidents of terrorism by 90% from 2002 to 2005.Wall Street Journal, ""After Sharon"", January 6, 2006.Not an ""Apartheid Wall""Fence? Security barrier? Apartheid wall? Israel's foreign minister, Silvan Shalom, stated in 2004 that the barrier is not a border but a temporary defensive measure designed to protect Israeli civilians from terrorist infiltration and attack, and can be dismantled if appropriate.""Statement by Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom"", Israeli Foreign Ministry, March 17, 2004. The Supreme Court of Israel ruled that the barrier is defensive and accepted the government's position that the route is based on security considerations. The Supreme Court Sitting as the High Court of Justice Beit Sourik Village Council vs. The Government of Israel and Commander of the IDF Forces in the West Bank.(Articles 28-30) With this: The West Bank barrier, which has also been called the ""apartheid wall"" isolates Palestinian communities in the West Bank and consolidates the annexation of Palestinian land by Israeli settlements. ""Statistics"", B'Tselem, October 2005. The Israeli foreign ministry says that it will cause no transfer of population and that none of the estimated 10,000 Palestinians (0.5%) who will be left on the Israeli side of the barrier (based on the February 2005 route) will be forced to migrate. ""Humanitarian Aspects: Impact on Palestinians"", Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, July 24, 2006. The barrier has been presented as a reasonable and necessary security precaution to protect Israeli civilians from Palestinian terrorism. Supporters of the barrier consider it to be largely responsible for reducing incidents of terrorism by 90% from 2002 to 2005. Wall Street Journal, ""After Sharon"", January 6, 2006.Not an ""Apartheid Wall""Fence? Security barrier? Apartheid wall? Israel's foreign minister, Silvan Shalom, stated in 2004 that the barrier is not a border but a temporary defensive measure designed to protect Israeli civilians from terrorist infiltration and attack, and can be dismantled if appropriate.""Statement by Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom"", Israeli Foreign Ministry, March 17, 2004. The Supreme Court of Israel ruled that the barrier is defensive and accepted the government's position that the route is based on security considerations. The Supreme Court Sitting as the High Court of Justice Beit Sourik Village Council vs. The Government of Israel and Commander of the IDF Forces in the West Bank.(Articles 28-30) She has also replaced this: ''Israel has created separate roads for Israelis and Palestinians. Israeli human rights group B'Tselem said ""Palestinians are barred from or have restricted access to 450 miles of West Bank roads, a system with 'clear similarities' to South Africa's former apartheid regime"".{{cite web |url=http://www.btselem.org/english/publications/summar

1

0

1

" You guys can't even agree on how to archive the page??? This is just unreal. I'm going to wait a while and see if I can compromise somehow and get the job done. Do we need to put this to a vote or a strawpoll, hmm?? - ✍ "

0

Nuff respect also from me - for your tireless work on the Sarah Palin page.

0

Hm...sorry to butt in, but following this logic also means that taking away links is similarly meaningless. If you were to be checking and editing our content, your contribution would be worthwhile - but if you're only removing added links regardless of content...

0

Bought Kamagra in the Uk for FREE yes you heard for FREE from http://www.uk-kamagra-viagra.co.uk

0

Firstly, the salute the Klan uses is no more 'Nazi' than the Bellamy Salute. Infact, Klansmen have been specifically told to salute with the left arm to further differentiate from the 'Nazi' salute. Furthermore, I have not uploaded photos of any salutes whatsoever! Show me where!

2

0

" No, he's agreeing with the fact that the singer and teh movie actreess are not given precedence over the religious figure and the historical figure based on movie/Cd consumption, and compraing to this debate here. '''' (cricket calendar poll!'') "

0

" Your block to the ""Rachael Ray"" editor UGH! How dare you block the sacred one who willingly and justly defames Rachael Ray. I have met Rachael Ray and she is the dark one! You must reconsider your horrid actions or the syncrogryph of the fifth apocryphal will reign down upon your hairs with the might of 1000 horses!"

0

2

This page is getting repeatedly changed by Bhramins( upper castes) who have an ulterior motive in covering up the opression of lower castes. I have reversed the anti quota POV and pro Bhramin POV from modern developments

1

0

1

Image requested|people of Kansas|American football people}} {{

0

, but everyone does hear things different!

0

" Nothing of the sort - Sumple and I are merely trading ""Quotes of the moment"". It just so happens that one of us was much more quote-worthy than the other. "

0

James Randi and truth. Sorry. That's like matter and anti-matter. But since we can't mass produce or yet mine anti-matter, and Randi will never be anywhere close to the truth, there will be no explosion. So his behind will still be there for you. Pucker up Randi-boy.

0

1

0

1

entitled to remove the comment which I have done so leave it be.

0

" Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Killing Floor (2009 video game). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. clamation point "

0

":::: There should be some priomordial quality mandate. Wikipedia should want quality verifiable references. If [WP:VER] is intended to be weaponized then a bot could be made that deletes pages and sections based on whether the section contains an insufficiently prestigious reference. Treating WP:VER as an intentional algorithm would allow an attacker to delete perhaps as high as 90% of wikipedia without even needing to look at the content. No one could invoke any objection to the mass deletion if the literal interpretation of WP:VER is the most important rule on wikipedia. Vandalism becomes impossible if criteria for removal applied to a science page can be robotically applied to a philosophy page. The above attack would meet a common sense interpretation of vandalism. The only possible protection from the mass deletion attack is if [WP:VAN] is considered to have higher priority for literal interpretation than WP:VER. There should already be a common sense acceptance that Vandalism is more dangerous and objectively assessed than the quality of referenced material, and as shown above, rejecting the statement binds wikipedia to a suicide pact. Its my view that the recent deletions are indistinguishable from robotic vandalism and they deleted high quality and verifiable references based only on the content hosting platform. If Vandalism and Verifiability are to be equally considered in actions, then restoring the content and tagging it as needing better sources should be done. Also if there is to be a defense from robotic deletion of the majority of wikipedia, then ""deletors"" that have shown no previous contribution to the page should be treated more suspiciously than those who have helped build it. "

0

1

good find. I removed the part about MC Mystic's complaint but added that rolling stone article. I think someone should rephrase everthing now

0

" This is childlish: First of all, I am tired of people who show up to a page and think they have the right to add any modifications they feel like. Next time, before you have the intentions of modifying the alticle considerably (or the contents in this case) it would be wise to write down something in the discussion page, otheriwse you work might end up being in vane. Secondly, the tempalte for the content is BY FAR THE UGLIEST I have ever seen. It quite hard for a newcomer to realize he has got to look through the text. The old content probably wasn't the best possible, but was significantly better. Also, the old content is not occupied by history in more than 50%. I understand Romania has a rich history, but the notion of independence was not a huge idea before 1800s. India has existed as a 'culture' long before the Roman Empire, therefore there is no point in comapring the importance of the history section of the two countries. Check the Germany article to see the model I have edited the format of the history section. You are welcome to edit the history section, but do not add 20 entries about history in the contents section (i.e.: that is why national awakening, independence and union are in the same section; feel free to modify the name, but do not further split it). Also, for similar reasons, there is little point in expanding the section about Dacia. I might be worong, but you seem to play around a lot with the position of the images. Please do not. Right now they are placed where they are because of some specific reasons. I will add more comment later Now the answers: You are welcome. Next time you add about 30k+ of information to an article and somebody comes and starts freaking with the article, you will be really happy. Appearance and professional looking? Is that what you are calling the template for the contents section? Come on, try to be objective and agrre that even the contents section on the present page is really ugly. I have allready replied to this and I do not feel the need to throw away some of my time to add more reasoning to this rather retarded dispute. Note: The big size also has a real outcome, and that is the article is really annoying to edit because it takes almost 10secs between the press of the save button and the reloading of the page (and it is not my connection) Again I allready explained this. The issue was not the byte count but the length of the contents section that took several pages to scroll down (and I think more than hald of the contents were SMALL entries into the history section). The article is about Romania, not about the History of Romania. Again feel free to click this link and edit. The history is there, it happened, and therefore the history ARTICLE should be expanded. ""(some of us hate to change pages!)"" Some other readers hate to search stuff about Romania and have to scroll down through pages of history to get to some more present facts."" Putting links is not equivilent to giving a reader a recap of the era—in particular, I find the way you did it in that page to be poorly prioritized."" This is your opinion. The page has beeen previously reviewed by other users (check the article milistone) and they found it actually really aggreable and felt the need to specify the usefulness of the way it was 'prioritizied'. For exampel in Europa Yearbook (a kind of printed version of CIA Factbook that is printed yearly). Also, your example with journals is at least annoying. Journals are actually reviewed by professionals, which means that people who nt what is happening agree on those formalities. This is not Libertatea where you need to put catchy titles to make people buy your crap. This is an encyclopaedia and should have some professionalism in the way titles are given. I checked and decided the contents section is REAAAAALLY ""off-putting"". It is unfortunate, but I find it fair to undo edits from people who do not ask first, than to reedit their edits. IT IS UGLY!!!!!! Also, what browsers? Anything that is not Firefox or IE has no weight. (i.e. even Opera is a niche browser) Also, I did not get the joke about first of July. If you were refering to the date I have created this account, then... you are at least superficial to base your opinions on that. There are al least two possibilities that you cannot prove with this kind of research: 1) that I did not have another account before then. 2) that I did not do real publishing in real life (i.e. in real Journals, were people review your stuff before publishing) Cheers and have fun at not modifying the contents section in a way allready described why not to. "

0

1

Moving comment There was already a Warnings section with the date of your warning so I popped it in there for neatness and to group them together. Please move it back if you like.

0

What about use in other langueges? What about use in other langueges, i.e. in Chinese?

0

Template policy discussion You are invited to help consider a common template policy for all WP:SPORTS biography articles at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sports#Template_policy_discussion. (T/C//WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)

0

2007 (UTC) Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. 17:43, 1 March

0

" You are featured on encyclopediadramatica I hope you don't shoot the messenger, but I thought you should know... I went to that site and your article on that site is now the front page article. Unfortunately, my dear Kirk, MONGO is well aware of it, just like we his friends are. Some people, like those who made that article at ED, should really get a life instead of insulting and ridiculing good people and valued contributors, don't you think... ♥ tell me - Thanks, Phaedriel. It never ceases to amaze me how people can be so rude from afar. I've removed the links to that site from my page. Ah, look at it this way; as long as whatever fool did this is busy with rubbish like this, they can't be vandalising our project. You know what's fun about ED articles about Wikipedia users? THey're good at keeping track of personal attacks, like the one I just reverted -) Happy editing! (Karwynn) "

0

" You might be interested in this Locked Article... ...and pro-RAO vandalism as noted on Talk page: [Talk:Recent_African_origin_of_modern_humans] (removal of {cn} request tags, etc...as I noted removing tags was a vandalism problem also in the [Multiregional] article) as well as possible POV reasons why it's not being updated to reflect sources showing Chris Stringer now doubting RAO more ...plus tonight I added that the SAME anthropologists' book, who were used in the lede because they USED TO BE saying that RAO is the ""mainstream"" hypothesis, is a book that now withdrew that claim and says multiregional gained ""support"" over the formerly-dominant RAO hypothesis. As it's a locked article, I can't edit it (I guess there's a waiting-period or I'd need to edit 10, 20, 50, or ??? articles before I get permission as a New USer to edit a Locked Article?). Thanks. 209.97.203.60 "

0

" Tajik, for the sake of constructiveness, give up on ""YOU"" in capital letters or insults/attacks. The same accusations that you bring up against me above of allegedly ""hating Persians"", I can say exactly about you towards Turks. The fact is, you have been arguing all along trying to remove every single reference to word Turkic in the article, and that's not the way it will be. Safavids were Turkic-speaking dynasty of Iran, that came to power with help of Qizilbash Turkic tribes, their founder wrote in Turkic language and used it as official language of his court. So, until you accept these basics, there will no consensus. "

1

0

Reversion Seat > See Reverted change of See to Seat: bishops properly do have a See ~ • Talk + new

0

, 29 July 2015 (UTC) Beja hey? Hotbed of football pride or just another city of SLB/SCP fans? 23:09

0

Why not just name the article Mega Drive which would support a world wide view on the subject instead of teaming up and being bias Americans? then the page would not need protecting as everyone would be happy, except you bias Americans... 82.41.107.134

2

0

Caribbean Assessments Oh, have I worked with assessments. About ten thousand or so. Yeah, I was anticipating that this project would do them as well. Right now, I'm trying to reorganize the Geographical section of the Project Directory for cleaner, smaller breakdowns, and will hopefully be setting up the assessment page either this afternoon or tomorrow.

0

" 1820 Map vs Globe The image in the infobox should be a geographic locator as well, showing where the state is within a larger context of the world. It doesn't seem consistent with map of other Chinese dynasty articles (e.g. Ming, Tang, etc). Geographic locator map is mainly used for current country map (not historical map), e.g. People's Republic of China, United States, etc The Qing Dynasty, although is a dynasty of the past, is also largely a modern political entity, and its history is intertwined with modern world history. That's why I think a geographic locator is better suited, as it also mirrors the Republic of China (1912-1949) article. Another thing to consider is that because there are so many contemporaneous maps of the Qing that's available (where as such maps are rare for prior historic dynasties, such as Ming and Tang), it is difficult to choose one that truly represent the whole article in the infobox. I agree that showing all the different maps of the Qing Dynasty at its various extent and time periods is informative to readers, but they don't have to be in the infobox; a general geographic locator is a good fit there. Plus, the maps of the Qing Dynasty at 1820 and 1833 are already in the article. 上海\沪\滬\Shanghai I am not going to respond in full at the moment, as I would like to sleep. I will, however, return to it when I feel like it (a few hours at the very least). so where should I respond? my page or yours? (TALK) Equal Standards TheLeopard, I thank your for your unending quest for the truth, and your campaigning for the integrity of Wikipedia. However, there are other areas of Wikipedia that would greatly profit from similar vigor. Take for instance the previously widely unknown National Capital Region (China). You rescued it from obscurity caused by a redirect. However, it must have escaped you that this article does not contain a single reference, and that there are several claims and outright speculations that deserve at least a dubious tag. A National Capital Region (China) is worthy of the same attention to detail as China’s capital, or other cities such as Shanghai. While it is the job of the author to provide these references (lest the author would risk a deletion), the lack of verifiable sources should at least have been pointed out. I have done so in the meantime. Thank you The only reason I rescued that article was because it was redirected to Bohai Economic Rim, which clearly is not the same thing as National Capital Region. The article needs to be tagged with ""unreferenced"" and a bunch of other tags. Beijing I know we've had some issues before, but I have to commend you for the Beijing edits. I wanted to make the same, but didn't dare. Thank you. You are now a Reviewer Hello. Your account has been granted the ""reviewer"" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010. Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Alternate term in lede section of Standard Mandarin Hi, TheLeopard, I hope you've seen by now the new section I opened in ar

0

" Made in the USA? http://rexcurry.net/wikipedialies.html There are some regular writers on Wikipedia who knowingly engage in personal attacks and deletions (even of links) of anyone who explains the connection between Edward Bellamy and his cousin Francis Bellamy (author of the pledge of allegiance) and National Socialism. It is behavior that breaks Wikipedia's rules. What kind of people cover-up for Nazis and that horrid ideology? Many regular writers on Wikipedia are lying liars and the lies they tell include the top media cover-ups. They cover up many historic photos of the Pledge of Allegiance http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html that reveal its original straight-arm salute. They cover up the fact that the author of the Pledge of Allegiance (Francis Bellamy), and his cousin and cohort (Edward Bellamy), were National Socialists and supported the ""Nationalism"" movement, the ""Nationalist"" magazine, the ""Nationalist Educational Association,"" their dogma of ""military socialism,"" and Edward inspired the ""Nationalist Party."" They cover up the Pledge's straight-arm salute as the origin http://rexcurry.net/pledge1.html of the salute of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nazis). As part of the cover up, they perpetuate the myth http://rexcurry.net/pledgesalute.html that the straight-arm salute was from ancient Rome. They cover up discoveries by the historian Rex Curry. The Pledge began with a military salute that then stretched outward toward the flag. Historic photographs are at http://rexcurry.net/pledge2.html and at http://rexcurry.net/pledge_military.html showing the evolution of the gesture. Due to the way that both gestures were used, the military salute led to the Nazi salute. The Nazi salute http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-pledge.html is an extended military salute. A mnemonic device is the swastika (""Hakenkreuz"" in German). Although the swastika was an ancient symbol, it was also used sometimes by German National Socialists to represent ""S"" letters for their ""socialism."" Hitler altered his own signature http://rexcurry.net/book1a1contents-swastika.html to use the same stylized ""S"" letter for ""socialist."" Wikipedia's liars cover up for the swastika http://rexcurry.net/swastikanews.html and its use as a sick socialist symbol. Wikipedia's liars cover up for the National Socialist German Worker's Party http://rexcurry.net/swastikamedia.html by overuse of the hackneyed shorthand ""Nazi."" Many Wikipedia posters are liars in that there was no ""Nazi Party"" because it was actually the ""National Socialist German Workers' Party"" and the party members did not call themselves ""Nazis"" nor the ""Nazi Party."" The term ""Nazi"" developed from slang using the first syllable in the German pronunciation of the ""National Socialist German Workers' Party."" In that sense, the author of the Pledge of Allegiance was a ""Nazi"" too, in that the term means ""National Socialist."" The term ""Nazi"" is also used to hide the National Socialist dogma behind the Pledge of Allegiance, its original gesture, and the National Socialist German Workers' Party. Wikipedia's liars use the term ""Nazi"" and the misnomer ""Nazi Party"" to cover-up the horrors of socialism. Wikipedia's liars cover up the the socialist trio of atrocities and and their socialist Wholecaust (of which the Holocaust was a part): 62 million people were slaughtered under the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics; 35 million were slaughtered under the Peoples' Republic of China; 21 million were slaughtered under the National Socialist German Workers' Party. They cover up the fact that socialists helped start WWII with the National Socialist German Workers' Party and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics together http://rexcurry.net/socialistwar.html as allies in 1939. They cover up for and are deniers of the socialist Wholecaust, http://rexcurry.net/mediacoverup.html of which the monstrous Holocaust was a part. Liars on Wikipedia repeat common lies http://rexcurry.net/mediapledge.html of the media. http://rexcurry.net/socialistmedia.html Wikipedia should not be cited for support because it is no different than quoting various anonymous sources who have no knowledge of the topic http://rexcurry.net/wikipedialies.html or who have lies to spread about the topic. The Wikipedia article for the ""Roman salute"" used to be complete disinformation, deliberately maintained by liars who tried to perpetuate myths. Here is an excerpt of what Wikipedia used to carry: ""The Roman salute is a closed finger, flat-palm-down hand raised at an angle (usually 45 degrees) and was used by the Roman Republic. It was also the historical civilian salute of the United States, from 1787?-1934?, known since 1892 as the Bellamy salute. It was also the historical salute among armies of the Middle East and South America. When the Nazi party o

2

0

2

" Hello, , and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! talk Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility"

0

" Thanks Random. I agree that that is a better approach, because it lets us de-couple the link text from the link. But in this case I think the redirects are legitimate, and it is good to point into the list via them as they insulate the template against any change in target. i.e. if someone creates an article on an R-phrase, the redirect can be re-targetted. If we were linking directly into the list, we'd be stuffed. Bryan, if you prefer the tooltip to say ""Explosive when dry"" rather than ""R1: Explosive when dry"", you could change from [[{{{2}}}: {{{1}}}|{{{2}}}]] to [[{{{2}}}: {{{1}}}|{{{2}}}]] Hesperian "

0

" Fair use rationale for Image:Smurf1.gif Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Smurf1.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 1 != 2 "

0

Integration branch? Wha? I have no idea what you mean. talk - contribs

0

" question Usually there's a little infobox at the bottom of the page where I can rate & comment on the article's content. I found this to be a pretty informative article, so, naturally, I wanted to give it a solid 5 stars. Unfortunately, I was unable to find this application on this page, is this due to a technical error? _friend "

0

Huggle 3 Hey Deathlaser! I am Petrb, one of core developers of Huggle, the antivandalism tool, which you are beta testing (according to https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers). I am happy to announce that Huggle 3 is ready for some testing. You can read more about it at WP:Huggle/Huggle3_Beta. Please keep in mind that this is a development version and it is not ready for regular use. That means you must: Watch your contribs - when anything happens you didn't want, fix it and report a bug Frequently checkout source code and build latest version, we change it a lot If you find any problem with a feature that is supposed to work perfectly, please let us know. Some features are not ready yet, it is listed in known problems on Huggle3 beta page, you don't need to report these - we know it! So, that's it. Have fun testing and please let us know about any problems, either using bugzilla @ http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/ or . Please respond to my talk page, I am not going to watch your talk page. Thank you

0

Yes, the article is great now, i'll change my vote. What a coincidence, I just finnished reading the article. 23:57, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

0

Go ahead and talk to the admins. You are a personal friend of Mitchell's and I can prove it. Stop editing the article per COI.

0

Well in this case the stuff he keeps deleting is not a direct copy, it is a paraphrase. Also articles that are direct copies and then just in quotes get speedy deleted. 23:38, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

0

happy October 2014 everyone. hope its a good October 2014 for everyone.

0

" Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — talk "

0

Aside from that which anyone deserves, respect

0

" ""oo9"", if you have ANY actual evidence, show it. You claim something found on May 23, 2013 - I can find no links that back you up. Either come up with evidence or go away you trolling little tea retard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.236.94 "

0

2

Eric_Kandel I noticed you added content to the page of Eric_Kandel. I created a page on the neuropsyhotherapist Fred M. Levin. Levin is a fan of Kandel's work. Unfortunately, the page on Levin is up for deletion. I am not asking you to vote. But perhaps you can check the Levin page to add some info. mwalla

0

":::::Nope. That discussion some months ago reached the end of the consensus process (namely, ""Find a reasonable (if temporary) compromise"", which at that time was non-inclusion). We are now at the beginning of a new consensus cycle. '''''' [ contribs ] "

0

" I checked what links here and found Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive105#Block for review: ""I've preemptively blocked . See for background. I'd appreciate it if someone gave this a second look. ∇∆∇∆ ""Looks good to me. That's a hell of a find. talk ""Absolutely a good call. ""Appreciate that action "" (Brief WP:ANI discussion blockquoted above.) — ✉ "

0

"Thank you for the refs on Scott Owens (poet)! — X S G "

0

Thank you very much for the kind welcome. I've been reading Wikipedia as an unregistered user for a couple of years. At first I was a bit of an 'Encyclopedia snob'; over time, I've come to appreciate Wikipedia as a useful and enjoyable resource. I've been lurking as a registered user for a little bit, and after trying my hand at some small edits, felt it was time to contribute a bit more. I very much appreciate the references you provided. I'll read them as a first step in my education here. I'll also continue to look at existing pages for inspiration and example. Your user page is certainly impressive to me - I'll be sure to use it, and other such pages, as inspiration when I update mine in the future. Kindest regards,

0

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

0

No such polls exist and there is nothing in Wikipedia policy to suggest they are necessary.

0

" Alright, I am willing to concede that the CIA allegations are flimsy at best, therefore, I will stop the edit warring. While you may not consider it too important, I think the issue of Assange as the founder to be another example of lazy journalism. Your source for Assange as founder of Wikleaks was MSNBC.com. I don't necessarily consider MSNBC to be a reliable source most of the time. Corporate news does not do ""real"" journalism. They copy news from one source or they make stories up. It seems to me that the idea of Assange as founder is a meme. I have never read a quote from Assange whereby he states that he founded Wikileaks. This idea seems to be mostly promulgated by the U.S. corporate media. Perhaps to vilify him in the minds of Americans, so that later he can be lynched. This seems like Propaganda 101 to me. The Wikileaks site does not identify Assange as the founder. Where is the evidence? THC Loadee 04:08, 4 MARCH 2011 (UTC)"

0

1

Phase two of the war on schumin We are entering into phase 2 of the war on Schumin. The Wikipedia Reform Trust is resolved to force user:Schuminweb to recognise me in an edit summary. We are issuing amnesty's to all innocent parties in the hope that they may persuade user:Schuminweb to come around to a reasonable settlement. You can help us achieve this. All he has to do is recognise me in an edit summary. Easy, innit! 86.40.214.4

0

1

What, I never agreed with you. You clearly know nothing about baseball or you do not understand English. I am just glad you don't live in this country because people like you don't belong. I am making your day? HAHA, you are a sad sad human being.

2

0

1

" On the subject of English National Opera, tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/webchecklinks.py?page=en:English_National_Opera is reporting a lot of deadlinks, and I thought I'd try to fix them. Some might just be temporary problems (The Independent?) but the Gramophone ones seem to be dead permanently since they've switched to a new fee-based archive and retired their previous archive. A search for a few sample ones using the ""Wayback Machine"" brings no joy. Any thoughts? Talk "

0

We can agree on one thing: the numbers do speak for themselves. The fact that they seem to be saying something else to you than to me, and some sources, is irrelevant.

0

Hi alsion could you please explain the nessage you left ?

0

" A ""warning"" by another editor. But, who polices Blocking? Is it like grafitti? Anyone can do it? Can it be done on a whim? Can someone block another because Gamaliel, with the back of his hand to his forhead, claims harassment? Look before you leap Here is some examples of ""Gamaliel's"" editing work. Perhaps Bishonen should block Gamaliel: 2-26-2006 Gamaliel said an editor was ""pushing disproved chin nonsense AGAIN"" 2-24-2006 Gamaliel said ""oh lord not the mauser and the big chin nonsense again"" 2-17-2006 Gamaliel said another editor was being ""quite obnoxious."" 2-16-2006 Gamaliel said an editor was making ""an absurd claim."" 1-30-2006 Gamaliel said an editor wanted ""to insert conspiracy nonsense into the article."" 1-24-2006 Gamaliel called an editor's information ""rambling, barely coherent rants."" 1-19-2006 Gamaliel refered to an editor's position as ""your ridiculous objections."" 1-12-2006 Gamaliel said he was going to remove ""this Mauser nonsense."" 1-2-2006 Gamaliel said that a contribution ""is nuts."" 12-31-2006 Gamaliel decided someone's edits ""were a mess."" 9-21-2006 Gamaliel accused an editor of ""offensive amateur analysis."" "

0

2

you were wrong to delete Diahn williams. Acting in the Andy Griffin show and kissing Don Knotts makes her a notable person.

0

" Courtesy Hi, Malke ... in case you miss it, I left a note for you in my section at the Doc James arb case request. Best regards, (Talk) "

0

" Re Timbouctou You've been mentioned on an ANI thread I posted , hope you don't mind. It concerns (TALK) "

0

" Sir Henry Russell, 1st Baronet Suggest merging Sir Henry Russell, 1st Baronet here. No evidence that he meets WP:POLITICIAN or any other part of WP:BIO, or the WP:GNG. His claim to notability is having been chief justice of Bengal, and it may be that more sources can be found to establish his notability, but so far there is no evidence of the required significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. (talk) • (contribs) "

0

You know what he'll say. NOW this discussion is over. HA!

0

1

okay why not ask wil wheaton yourself.tell him about the uncyclopedia on wil wheaton

0

" Well, totaly diferent is that the term as it uses the name macedonia within it refers to Macedonian (as you want) political influence, and there is no need for a ""google site"", it refers to something macedonian, and implicating bulgarian POV makes the statements in the artical unrelevant, but if you want so, continue to do it, cose I give up, you have google here to be the smartest, congratulations. (not everithing is written ""on"" internet). 00:00,14 June 2006 (UTC)"

1

0

1

YOU TOO JEFF G, FUCKIN HOMOS.

0

3

0

1

create an account.

0

This message is regarding the page Christopher murt. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. t • @

0

" Apology accepted and no hard feelings! Regards, 13:58:33, 2005-08-24 (UTC)"

0

1. You are lying. Post the sentence where it says 33 million if you are not lying. 2. You are violating your topic ban by being here, and if you do not leave, I will report your malfeasance and have you permanently banned. 3. The Kleck study is 20 years old and based on discredited methodology. It honestly should not even be in the article. You are embarrassing yourself by fawning over it.

0

1

" I couldn't help noticing that Stucky and Stravinsky both start with ""St"" and end with ""ky"". Coincidence? Maybe. -) "

0

" Article name Why is it in Italics? It should be changed. Holla at me! "

0

":::: To User:Sennen goroshi: Well, you could have at least used terms such as bullcrap, horsecrap, cowcrap, or any other less offending words than ""bulls**t"", whatever the lame drama you witnessed. And you just said ""a single f**king word""...Do you feel like a grown man when you use that kind of language? There could be some children refering to Wikipedia for his/her homework, and I don't want them to learn foul languages here. I do not know what this ""wikilawyering"" that I have supposed to be doing according to you. I only could find that it is a pejorative term. Could you explain to me, an ignorant user who is new to Wikipedia, that exactly what behavior of mine is ""wikilawyering""? Why do you have to say things like ""just to shut you up"", or ""you would waste so much of the other editors' time""? You are hurting my feelings. It is uncalled for. I am a delicate, sensitive guy -_-. ""Wikipedia articles are made by editors gaining consensus - this process is something that you do not seem to have any respect for"". - Have a look at the policy: Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion. You say ""this process is something that you do not seem to have any respect for"", but notice that I am the one who officially started a consensus-gathering effort at , and you have not even participated in it. Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars! What a valuable piece of information that I have not noticed. So what? I don't see this discussion included in that category. By saying that, you are not offending every editors who participated in and worked hard for this discussion, are you? "

0

1

0

1

Your disgusting personal habits aside,

0

1

Ancient Greek sites in Serbia Hi! I have two questions about Niš and Lebane. Regards,

0

":::::Reviewing your edit history, the words ""pot"" and ""kettle"" are the best I can come up with in response to that! "

0

":Hah. Actually, I think on topic. This is completely unfounded right now. From the page: ""As you know the Nintendo Wii is heavily based on the Gamecube. It's very easy already to run Linux under a Gamecube so it should also work on the Nintendo Wii. While is not ready yet, it should see the light very soon."" Yeah, all he has to do is break the copyright protection, find out how the hardware has changed from the Gamecube, compensate for said changes, and so on. It's non-new right now. "

0

Necrometics is run by a librarian, it is not a reliable source. The World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators Which issue? This has been in print since 1963. Rummel's book is not peer reviewed and his figures and methods are heavily critiqued. I will look at Obermeyer now, majority of sources I have read on this say 3million killed.

0

Not all languages have their proto- counterpart.

0

Oh shut up Bong, your deleting for your fun god damnit

0

1

" The web statistics are not that easy to interpret. Most visitors to his sites will be from academia, because non-academics are not interested in the intricacies of physics at an advanced level. Many of those visits are simply due to curiosity; e.g., I go to his website often to find out what more ""nonsense"" and fantastic claims he has put up there. Over a decade, I have told many colleagues about his activities, and they too must visit his websites occasionally. How do you think that knowledge about his research is so widespread that all reputable journals have shunned his work? Now, it is true that some B.Sc.'s would be impressed by him; however, for their doctoral degrees their work would have to satisfy at least academics with Ph.D.s. Note his insulting manner. He wrote four unsolicited e-mails to M.N.J. Singh. When Singh replied, he accused Singh of being a felon, etc. Just as an experiment, take up a false identity through Yahoo and then send amild note casting doubt on ECE theory to Evans. See how he blasts and insults your assumed persona, including calling you a ""cyber-terrorist"". "

0

1

I will deal with your input above but desist from calling me by that name. I understand you've been doing this on other sites in the Wikipedia system. You are a frustrated man and I think we should meet to discuss this problem you have with me as Pakhtun Tanoli. Is it because other Pakhtuns have been challenging you after my contributions to the debate regarding Pakhtun status of Tanolis. You've have been peddling this name about on different sites in Wikipedia and I've left it for proud Pakhtuns and others to challenge you. Get it into your ignorant head that Tanolis are Pakhtuns and Janjuas are kasbis (I know at least 3 families of Janjua origin who do not claim to rajputs but say they are of Maliyar caste. None of the historical sources link them with rajputs. Ghakhars use the title raja but are not rajputs as do the Turks of Hazara, in Manakrai,and they are not rajputs either - read about Raja of Mahmoodabad. Moreover, the real Rajputs of Rajputana use the universal title of Singh to denote their proud identity (the term raja is reserved for the rulers). As for the Gujjar issue it is well documented that Jat, Gujjar and the so-called rajputs of northern Punjab are the same people. This leads to the conclusion that maybe the Janjua claim to be rajput is suspect as I have said all along. Darbar-e-Akbari, Tuzuk-e-Jahangiri and other historical works do not mention Janjuas and Rajputs together and locate the former in Bhir far away from Hazara, and more importantly, from real Rajputs as well. I accept there are people who live in Tanawal and use Tanoli as their geographical origin but they do not fit into the clan system of the original Tanawalis. We know who the gujjar families are in Tanawal and they do not use Tanoli for themselves though they do say they reside in Tnawal. Other Gujjars in Hazara are either settled or are move about between Swat, Upper hazara and Azad Kashmir. Additionally, you seem to be on a mission to prove something that is not proveable. I know you are in the UK and I can meet you face to face to discuss this if you prefer. We can sort a number of things relevant to this debate as well as you can know who I really am. (User: Pakhtun Tanoli - 11:41

2

0

1

" RE: Apology, No worries I hope you didn't read my comment as rude, I certainly did not intend it as such, but simply a quick explanation for why I had removed your template, and reverted your changes. It is just that when an editor who has been established for many years finds a template threatening to block them on their page, it is not likely to get a good response. If my response was harsh, I apologize, but you should always check to see who you are templating if they are not an IP, and if they are established, it is always best to simply leave a note requesting more information, rather than a harsh template. I hope you understand, and no worries. Ariel♥Gold "

0

" Bladesmulti Dear you stated that the sources were unreliable. I have provided 6 books with verifiable tracking info: isbn, publishing house, date and author These l books are by Islamic scholars such as Sa'id Akhtar Rizvi, Abul A'la Maududi, Ehsan Elahi Zaheer and others I have also included an Islamic Encyclopaedia as reference: http://www.amazon.in/The-Everything-Understanding-Islam-Book-ebook/dp/B001OLRLAQ I have also included direct sources where the qutotations can be read such as: I will die either in Mecca or Medina.Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, Tadhkirah, Page 784}} You stated that alislam.org ""unreliable"". The website ""alislam.org"" is the main and official page of the Ahamadi religion. References: 2, 7, 24, 30, 35, 37, 40, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55,69, 74, 80 are all from this website in the this article."

0

1

0

Is there a way to have a solid, progressive discussion concerning this article and once and for all get it resolved?

0

Health He was really fat. No shocker he died.69.243.42.251

0

1

0

" Erm, the lead image is supposed to be illustrative, which it is, as it illustrates a brassiere quite clearly, and it's not needlessly overly sexualized, consistent with the encyclopedic tone of the article. Whether or not the woman is ""good looking"" is irrelevant; the picture serves its purpose. ✽ "

0

2

0

Warnings from administrators can be listed on the bottom of the case page of the closed arbitration, along with blocks, bans, or restrictions, so that the admins on arbitration enforcement can keep track. Regards,

0

WikiProject Pennsylvania Thank you very much for your contributions, but in the future, could you please sign your messages with four tildes? You're talking to a robot.

0

Hi Sukh I've compacted the section to a appropriate size.

0

I'm still in the process of perfecting this page. I'll be adding footnotes tomorrow.

0

Recent changes In light of the most recent EastEnders episode, changes have to be made because the template has got mistakes. Firstly, Kirsty Branning is a new character (who is permanent) and needs to be on the template. Derek Branning needs to be removed and placed in 'past characters'. In addition, to that I would like to request that I have powers to change the family trees seeing as you seem not to be doing that role which means we have three inaccurate family trees and I have been reminding you about for a while. If you cannot do, I would be prepared to. Enjoy Boxing Day!86.169.235.148

0

Voice actors Voice actors do not appear to be listed. Anyone who knows any, please add them.

0

Pussy pelmet...I'm having this deja-vu feeling...

0

1

0