inputs
stringlengths 124
2.83k
| targets
stringclasses 12
values | _template_idx
int64 0
9
| _task_source
stringclasses 1
value | _task_name
stringclasses 1
value | _template_type
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: ADFG is not scientific but a federal court is? Who's playing politics?
A: | No | 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example is below.
Q: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
A: Yes
Rationale: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: The real benefit of an income tax will not be in the money raised: what it will do is make people begin pointing out the wasteful expenditures of state government and demand these be eliminated. Right now with nobody paying, these expenses get paid with no negative input.
A: | No | 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Native: It's affirming to read such a positive post.
My background is 28 years of teaching/counseling dysfunctional adolescents. So I've been called most everything you can imagine and many things you can't. Each of those exchanges was a opportunty to discuss both the source of the anger and, at the same time, consider other ways of dealing with issues.
While it's probably presumptuous of me, I'd like to be able to help Boozer deal with his anger involving the Markets. It "eats you away", both figuratively and literally, to spend your days with intense unresolved anger.
Thank you for your supportive words....regards, Gary
answer:
No
question:
not mentioned it was a pot luck - I brought brownies! such sweet old ladies... did ya see me? I waved (and winked) at the camera! soo..yeah....unh..unh..it'll come back to me...ummmp? darn..CRS. . unh.... so tell us more about the free samples....
answer:
Yes
question:
"Other peoples’ lives are of no consequence to either of the Clintons." I'm sure the people of Rwanda would agree with that statement as well.
answer:
| No
| 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Reason: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this instance: Yes, Larry. You have complete contempt for actual facts. Reagan started supporting Republicans, not in "1962," a six year error, but in 1950, an 18-year actuality, when he supported the Trickster for Senate. Are you contending that all those school shooter lunatics who have been so helpfully aided by the NRA are "paragons of law abiding citizens?" The Panthers hadn't carried "fully loaded" (or partially loaded, I suppose) firearms often before their famous visit to the CA state capitol. Many were limited capacity shotguns, in fact. Most of the Blue Dogs were not gone by 2000. I gave you an actual list. There were EIGHT. Are you dense? One blue dog became a Republican after he left office and joined the Bush II administration. In fact, a member whom I had a major part in getting elected in 2006 was rejected for membership because they had reached their limit.
Mark Twain was right when he said, "Faith is believing what you know ain't so," Larry.
Student: | Yes | 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: And then, there are those who will sinfully and without just cause attack other human beings; many I've known in Alaska
who hide behind their Bible and Flag, are like bullies who will do whatever they wish so long as they come out on top.
Character assassinations and the whole ego power trip, to include labeling others who are no less Christian (or often moreso, that's the rub) as gay, liberal, or any number of odd things to distract from their own imperfections, lies, hateful and ungodly unchristian acts of vulgar mean-spirited spite.
I'm one of those closet christians whose life has been forever muddied by your 'faithful bigot Christ R US' materialistic gain society. OK to rob us of dignity, huh?
Call me gay or queer, and sell the idea to keep me from a full life in a small population state. Can I class-action sue all of you Posers in Christ? I won't because God is watching. LOL :)
Solution: | Yes | 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example solution: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: Notice the crime scene tape around the campus. This payroll tax proposal is criminal as is the collusion that PDC, the city and Dr. Weiwel concocted to use urban renewal dollars to create a real estate portfolio of commercial spaces for PSU. Just say no to these criminals all around.
| Solution: Yes | 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: At first I was afraid this article might piss me off, like most articles about Astoria by a non local do. But for me, it didn't. It's a short read. She didn't out any of my favorite local spots by name. She speaks to Astoria's grittiness, admits it's potential for full on gentrification (already happening) because of outsiders like herself and about how people here really do accept you as long as you show up authentically and accept others just the same. As an Astoria native I am, surprisingly, not pissed off at all. But I would like Willamette Week to let me have a crack at writing an article about Astoria from my perspective.
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: Or move out of the LIO and into a building that the state already owns.
Example Output: No
Example Input: Sorry, Bernie fans. His health care plan is short $17,000,000,000,000.
Front Page of todays WP
Example Output: | Yes
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: The news is people fall for this stuff.
Answer: Yes
Question: Government can't make a true economy. If I take $10 from my right pocket and put it in my left pocket, I still have $10. That's all they are doing. Yes, they infuse lots of money into the economy. That money came from the economy. They didn't make it. There is no new money. They produced nothing. Right now they have some money they removed from the economy years ago. When that's gone, they can only take a dollar and spend a dollar. The economy would have the exact same. When they take 3 billion from the PFD, that's 3 billion less for Alaskians to spend in the economy, but 3 billion more for government to spend. So the question is who do you want spending the money? Some corrupt politician in Juneau or thousands of Alaskans?
Answer: Yes
Question: Yes, Larry. You have complete contempt for actual facts. Reagan started supporting Republicans, not in "1962," a six year error, but in 1950, an 18-year actuality, when he supported the Trickster for Senate. Are you contending that all those school shooter lunatics who have been so helpfully aided by the NRA are "paragons of law abiding citizens?" The Panthers hadn't carried "fully loaded" (or partially loaded, I suppose) firearms often before their famous visit to the CA state capitol. Many were limited capacity shotguns, in fact. Most of the Blue Dogs were not gone by 2000. I gave you an actual list. There were EIGHT. Are you dense? One blue dog became a Republican after he left office and joined the Bush II administration. In fact, a member whom I had a major part in getting elected in 2006 was rejected for membership because they had reached their limit.
Mark Twain was right when he said, "Faith is believing what you know ain't so," Larry.
Answer: | Yes
| 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Why? The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input: Someone sired by a wildlife biologist would do well not to embarrass him by proclaiming her abysmal ignorance of the natural world and ecological systems and their functions. And one's chosen dietary perversity has no relevance to this topic.
I have presented facts. May I suggest this individual either counter my facts with some which disprove them, or stop wasting my and other readers' time.
Better yet, invite said wildlife biologist father to contribute to the discussion. I would expect him to give a better showing than his bombastic offspring--shrieking and flailing contribute nothing worthwhile to the debate.
Solution: | Yes | 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[Q]: Your charges are ridiculously absurd stupidity. The casino has boosted Florence economy bringing more tourists to that town, and the meth heads were there long before the casino showed up.
[A]: Yes
[Q]: Anyone legislator that gets toddler arithmetic wrong, 1+1=3 cannot be taken seriously. It is no wonder that the complexity of the oil tax credit system may be above her cognitive ability to understand the immense problems with them.
[A]: Yes
[Q]: Someone sired by a wildlife biologist would do well not to embarrass him by proclaiming her abysmal ignorance of the natural world and ecological systems and their functions. And one's chosen dietary perversity has no relevance to this topic.
I have presented facts. May I suggest this individual either counter my facts with some which disprove them, or stop wasting my and other readers' time.
Better yet, invite said wildlife biologist father to contribute to the discussion. I would expect him to give a better showing than his bombastic offspring--shrieking and flailing contribute nothing worthwhile to the debate.
[A]: | Yes
| 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
If they were acquiring the A320s they could turn around and sell them, if they don't want to operate a mixed fleet. At least they'd get some of their $2.6 billion back. So it certainly makes sense to factor in the planes.
If they go to an all Boeing fleet, all the Virgin employees are going to have to be trained on the 737, from pilot training to ground logistics. It's going to be expensive, no matter which way they go.
answer:
No
question:
What kind of a person knows what’s good for others?
Not to start a fight, but LTD and Eugene's city council have a history of telling others what they think is best for them, and passing regulation without any added input from others.
And supposedly they all work for us.
answer:
No
question:
Notice the crime scene tape around the campus. This payroll tax proposal is criminal as is the collusion that PDC, the city and Dr. Weiwel concocted to use urban renewal dollars to create a real estate portfolio of commercial spaces for PSU. Just say no to these criminals all around.
answer:
| Yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example solution: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: diversity baby, diversity.
| Solution: No | 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Part 2. Example
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Answer: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Part 3. Exercise
I lived for many years in Tok and Barrow, where one might think it would have been difficult to be a vegetarian. No problem at all.
Answer: | No | 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: Sir, I am a Korean veteran and a libertarian. And I dislike wimps who
post under false names. If you read my short piece more carefully, we
agree. But I don't want folks like you on my side, ever.
A: Yes
****
Q: How many aliases have you used, Travis? You can run but you can't hide. Yeah, then quit trying to harass. I flag you every time.
A: No
****
Q: Hey look, not that many years ago we were afforded the opportunity to vote whether to keep the annual dividend or take a one time buy out. I voted for the buy out....but no, keeping the annual check passed and here we are. I recall each eligible person would have received somewhere between 25-40k each. Don't ya wish ya could turn back that clock now?
A: | No
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Let me give you an example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
The answer to this example can be: Yes
Here is why: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
OK. solve this:
hey, y'all still there? i'm not liking the limited character feature. I know some posts get overly long - surely some of mine do - but let people just pass on it if they choose. to want to add truly 3 or 4 more words, or even letters, to a post and be stopped, stinks. and still not liking the peer review stuff - I think it is most likely a click click reaction from most users by now.
Answer: | No | 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
You're a day late and a dollar short, many agencies have seen 30 percent cuts. Keep up will ya?
No
Please explain why this event requires an endorsement for any kind of protest. Campaign visits to Eugene by presidential candidates Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were met here with lollipops and rainbows (and in the latter case, ice cream cones and a basketball jersey). Upon each's somber return in the wake of the Thurston and UCC shootings, protestors were derided for not respecting the office; you were near the front of that parade of criticism last fall.
I'm not 73, have never protested anything and have never believed telling others how to live is being a good neighbor, never mind a responsible citizen. However, I've long had a fascination with successful people, regardless of their political stripe, who somehow possess the mettle to move mountains. That includes Clinton and Obama, among many others.
Like it or not, Trump has accomplished something quite remarkable. That flaccid guarantee of contentiousness for his visit is not.
No
diversity baby, diversity.
| No
| 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[EX Q]: Howdy Boozer. I see you are earning your troll dollar again today. You're off your game though, just screaming they are all liars may appeal to some of your cheer squad, but to most thinking people it shows the last desperate efforts at denial. A guy has to wonder what kind of special soul defends indiscriminate broadcasting of toxins into the wind then calls them liars when people become ill?
[EX A]: Yes
[EX Q]: If I remember right when Sarah Palin was running for V P did not try and tell the America what Obama was all about? McCain told her to not say any thing, She knew Obama's history Muslim born and raised, look he has done to our country. Destroyed every way he can he hates America, Read the history on this Muslim family of Obama Winston Churchill put Obama grandfather in prison he was a Muslim and killing people.
[EX A]: Yes
[EX Q]: Reviewing Alaskan reality shows is pretty much like reviewing dog poop...It's the same ol' ......
[EX A]: | Yes
| 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: "This was really brought home to me once when an officer wrote on the back of a ticket right in front of me that the perpetrator admitted her offense when she was sitting down saying nothing. "
Really? Because I've never seen a ticket filled out in a courtroom before, nor have I ever seen a defense attorney show up at the side of the road on a traffic stop.
You say "...a policeman lied in every one of my cases..." in 20 years? That is a lie in and of itself. It seems I've caught you in two lies in a single paragraph. Hmm....
A: | Yes | 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Why? The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input: Is this you?
http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2015/09/brian_owendoff_broker_who_made.html
Solution: | No | 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Part 2. Example
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Answer: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Part 3. Exercise
The last time we had a little violence in an election year it was Mayor Daley's thugs beating protester's during a Democratic Convention in Chicago.
"Outside the official convention proceedings, anti-war demonstrators clashed with 11,900 Chicago police, 7500 Army troops, 7500 Illinois National Guardsmen and 1000 Secret Service agents over 5 days."
These are just scuffles.
You can't have a Real riot without Democrats.
Answer: | Yes | 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: Stating a fact is not censorship. Denigrating people in such an insulting manner is, in fact, a form of censorship since you and others posting like comments hope to silence anyone who does not believe as you do. Tolerant? Not hardly.
Solution: | No | 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: That's what makes Wasilla so special.
Example Output: No
Example Input: Test on humans. We're animals too. But oh, right, we're "special" animals because ... why?
Example Output: No
Example Input: Is this you?
http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2015/09/brian_owendoff_broker_who_made.html
Example Output: | No
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: You had my support until you made your comment about Muslims.
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: Move to Texas if you like the death penalty. I'm sure Texas won't disappoint you, Jacobson.
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: The last time we had a little violence in an election year it was Mayor Daley's thugs beating protester's during a Democratic Convention in Chicago.
"Outside the official convention proceedings, anti-war demonstrators clashed with 11,900 Chicago police, 7500 Army troops, 7500 Illinois National Guardsmen and 1000 Secret Service agents over 5 days."
These are just scuffles.
You can't have a Real riot without Democrats.
Example Output: | Yes
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example is below.
Q: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
A: Yes
Rationale: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: In order to understand the limits of science, one must be a scientist. To lay folks, science may appear to be firmly based and capable of explaining virtually everything in our universe. A scientist, or at least some scientists, see that our understanding of many things is shallow and based on massive extrapolation from what we do know. It pays for all to keep open minds. Our scientific understandings of origins is muddy. The understanding only appears clear when viewed from a distance without detail. There are many mysterious that science still has no testable understanding of.
A: | No | 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
There is no reason to change anything but to use the CBR as it is meant to be used. To take from the people now is nonsense. Instituting a Tax of any kind is unrepresented of keeping with a smaller government. What is really happening in Juneau is another shell game designed to steal from the people without justification just scare tactics and greed.
answer:
No
question:
Sounds like he feels he can "help" himself to others property. Theft of firearms is a serious charge and a huge mistake. He should be held just as accountable as any other thief, no matter what the circumstances that motivated him. It'll be hard to enjoy his good fortune in life from a penitentiary cell.
answer:
No
question:
We've witnessed dirty presidential Republican Party politics in past elections. I'll bet that the Republican Party elite may say that they won't endorse Trump, they'll be rolling around on the ground like their demon possessed just to get his attention or have his shadow cast in their direction. Watch and see. I love it that Trump is daringly cheery picking which Republican elite he'll let kiss his middle finger.
answer:
| Yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Ex Input:
If I recall the details correctly, Reynolds was an applicant for the job Gissiner got, then she stayed on in her former position, subsequently being fired by Gissiner.
Now, is it any surprise that the person who got the job would find some reason to fire his main potential rival? No, not at all, nor is it a surprise that she'd sue.
The sensible procedure for the City would have been to recognize the all too common political and personal dynamics in Reynolds's firing, and compensate her, without throwing away even more money in fighting what was almost a slam dunk on Reynolds part.
Ex Output:
No
Ex Input:
She listen to one side and makes her mind up. hahahahaha
Ex Output:
No
Ex Input:
Why are Frats still a thing? How can one defend the existence fraternities anymore? They do nothing for the community, and only seem to revolve around binge drinking, dangerous hazing and other stupid, dangerous, toxic behavior.
Ex Output:
| Yes
| 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[EX Q]: Ahh you're right. I had my bored activists mixed up. I had forgotten how important an arctic cat jacket is amongst the issues of the day.
[EX A]: Yes
[EX Q]: Most of us are sick of your inane scribbling.
[EX A]: Yes
[EX Q]: In order to understand the limits of science, one must be a scientist. To lay folks, science may appear to be firmly based and capable of explaining virtually everything in our universe. A scientist, or at least some scientists, see that our understanding of many things is shallow and based on massive extrapolation from what we do know. It pays for all to keep open minds. Our scientific understandings of origins is muddy. The understanding only appears clear when viewed from a distance without detail. There are many mysterious that science still has no testable understanding of.
[EX A]: | No
| 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Why? The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input: Nutter!
Solution: | Yes | 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example solution: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: To costly. Just shoot em I say.
| Solution: No | 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Islamic terrorism. They don't care if your tolerant, they just care that your American.
Answer: Yes
Question: I don't begrudge anyone who makes a good salary in whatever field they work in...even if its much higher than mine. I also sympathize with anyone that looses their job, whether they be a government employee or oil industry worker.
Then there is the comment from the conservative which goes something like: If oil industry workers get laid off then all state workers should have their pay cut or loose their jobs altogether because I hate government employees and want them to suffer. Real classy those conservatives are.
If the conservative thinks government employment is so lucrative, he or she had ample opportunity to obtain one of those "high paying, awesome benefits" jobs. The fact they never did is their problem. Instead the rag-a-colic conservative does the bidding of the 1%ers by attacking other middle class Americans and thus demonstrating they are too ignorant to know who they should be mad at. The result is Donald Trump.
Answer: Yes
Question: Nutter!
Answer: | Yes
| 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: Because its hate against White people. Only works if you are a minority, gay ect....ever hear of the WET (White entertainment tv) nope, not politically correct but its ok to have the BET (Black entertainment tv). How about the NAAWP( national association for the advancement of White people) nope, not politically correct but the NAAACP (national association for the advancement of Colored people) is OK. How about the congressional Black caucus...OK but its a no no to have a congressional White caucus. Its politically correct to hate White people, nothing racist about it.
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: Yes, and then cut oil subsidies - all of them.
Example Output: No
Example Input: To costly. Just shoot em I say.
Example Output: | No
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: And you don't pay anything for state government and services either.
A: No
****
Q: not mentioned it was a pot luck - I brought brownies! such sweet old ladies... did ya see me? I waved (and winked) at the camera! soo..yeah....unh..unh..it'll come back to me...ummmp? darn..CRS. . unh.... so tell us more about the free samples....
A: Yes
****
Q: What a load of GARBAGE TUCK! Seriously? Tuck: "i'm not coming because you won't give us A,B, and C". There are cuts across the board and Tuck is acting like a fool, Walker is all "keep on keeping on" while he sits by sipping a margarita watching building renovations. What a bunch of hypocritical, greedy, unintelligent, waste of space people. I too elect to write some columns, a 10-part column about recalling these failures of Alaska. You're paid to do a job and they screw around. Guess what tuck, programs and benefits will be cut...sorry, welcome to the real world. And Walker...just leave. Anyone else not wanting to do their part? I'll draw you a map to the border.
A: | Yes
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Why? The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input: Like I said, even if she is a tramp, *that* has nothing to do with the crimes. But when trying to converse with someone who reverts to schoolyard name calling, it's a futile conversation.
Solution: | Yes | 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: We could gather up the panhandlers and bus them to the fields. They'd have meaningful employment and could get back on their feet. I don't know how we'd go about assigning work. You - out to the field! You - wade through the entrails! You - clean those toilets!
No complaining!
Solution: | Yes | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: Trump could erase half this shortcoming by cross dressing.
A: | Yes | 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Native: It's affirming to read such a positive post.
My background is 28 years of teaching/counseling dysfunctional adolescents. So I've been called most everything you can imagine and many things you can't. Each of those exchanges was a opportunty to discuss both the source of the anger and, at the same time, consider other ways of dealing with issues.
While it's probably presumptuous of me, I'd like to be able to help Boozer deal with his anger involving the Markets. It "eats you away", both figuratively and literally, to spend your days with intense unresolved anger.
Thank you for your supportive words....regards, Gary
Answer: No
Question: Sounds like EverBank is trying to bully the state with its threats. They have probably been in cahoots with Pfeffer all along and this is their last ditch scare tactic.
Answer: No
Question: What? The PFD is income. Unearned income, granted, but still income. So let's do some math. Family A. 4 people. 30k earned income, 6k (modest average) PFD unearned income. Taxing the PFD, and that is what it is. (Webster defines taxes as a compulsory contribution to state revenue) 2k or a 5.5% income tax. Family B. 4 people. 100k earned income, 6k pfd. Same 2k pfd tax 1.8% income tax. The pfd TAX targets those that have the least. "Whatever you do unto the least of these, you do unto me."
Answer: | No
| 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Reason: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this instance: only have of the voting age population votes in any given election. That has been the case for decades. It hasn't affected anything. We still get crap. Blame the lame stream media. They give soft ball questions to the left giving us Hillary and attack the right until there is only a buffoon left.
Student: | Yes | 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: This is just further proof that the Malheur occupiers are all mentally ill people. These are clearly the acts of an unbalanced person. They need to all either be locked up in prison, or become a patient at a secure mental hospital.
Just look at this image of Scott Willingham taken during the occupation. Just look at all of the powerful weapons that he is armed with. And take a look at the absolutely crazed look on his face. That is clearly the face of a very dangerous insane maniac.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CZs_cRHWEAE0-4Q.jpg
Willingham is homeless, and has been living out of his pickup truck for a long time. He was still in his home state of Texas when the occupation started. Although only 48, he admitted to the news media during the occupation that he had not worked in a long time.
SOLUTION: Yes
PROBLEM: We could gather up the panhandlers and bus them to the fields. They'd have meaningful employment and could get back on their feet. I don't know how we'd go about assigning work. You - out to the field! You - wade through the entrails! You - clean those toilets!
No complaining!
SOLUTION: Yes
PROBLEM: A courageous man, in and out of the ring. When few would speak out, he risked his life's work to correctly point out the misguidedness of the Vietnam War. Certainly, he joined a Muslim religion, but this must be looked at in context of the black struggle of its day. I'm amazed at the conservatives who hate him for his belonging to a group seeking rights for its minority members, and doing so in a forceful way, yet these same white folks have no problem in strongly supporting idiots like the Malheur vigilantes whose only goal is to personally profit from land that belongs to all of us.
SOLUTION: | Yes
| 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
I think this article chooses to ignore the more common sense complaints made by those of us who don't like the way this city is currently being developed. We can accept that some houses will be torn down and replaced with apartments in the name of density, but too often these numbers are used to justify wasteful and short-sighted building practices. For instance, in the case of the Eastmoreland sequoia lots (a story I imagine developers and sympathizers of this article scoffed at), the neighborhood offered a very viable plan to build two smaller houses on the property without clearcutting the land, along with compensation for preserving the trees. Such houses would have been more affordable, and saved a valuable public resource: big trees. This option was rejected because the developer didn't have kit houses of the right size and shape available. A little creativity, common sense, and smarts could solve both the issue of density and destruction of the things we like about PDX.
answer:
No
question:
Unless your one of those with a straw at the public trough, you are certainly no better off today than you were 8-9 years ago. Obama was less qualified to answer the call than any of the crop offered up this season. Hillary offers up what ever is appropriate for the audience she is addressing, often in conflict with the next stop, i.e. She is an issue whore. Bernie is in only as a planted transition player for the ultimate socialism play by the party.
Trump would be at least entertaining and maybe, just maybe a dagger in both establishment parties that have been playing the people for years. Quit being a sucker people, $9 billion for an election? That's why the establishment is freaking out, they are losing control of and the $$$$$'s. It's a rip and it's time time say enough.
answer:
Yes
question:
Full Definition of perverse
1 a : turned away from what is right or good : corrupt b : improper, incorrect c : contrary to the evidence or the direction of the judge on a point of law <perverse verdict>
2 a : obstinate in opposing what is right, reasonable, or accepted : wrongheaded b : arising from or indicative of stubbornness or obstinacy
3 : marked by peevishness or petulance : cranky
A fellow poster has stated "vote for diversity. vote for Trump." In the context of Mr. Trump's demonstrated and enunciated personal values and attitude toward others, may I suggest that slogan should be "VOTE FOR PERVERSITY. VOTE FOR TRUMP."
answer:
| Yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Reason: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this instance: "...the government has more than honored woman on our money already."
Three women.
That's how little our government has honored women.
And a Native American has already been featured on U.S. paper money.
Student: | No | 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: AP reported they have contacted all of the Democratic Superdelegates last week and all but 45 will vote for Clinton.
"She has 520 currently right now. Almost 70% of her current Super delegate count came before the Primary even began. She has gained 161 super delegates since voting began.
Bernie has 39. He has gained 31."
I was very concerned with the report Bernie supporters are harrassing these delegates. They aren't changing and Sander's campaign guy Jeff Weaver just said--"none contacted will vote differently."
Answer: No
Question: Sitting on your behind wondering what to do next is worse.
Answer: Yes
Question: only have of the voting age population votes in any given election. That has been the case for decades. It hasn't affected anything. We still get crap. Blame the lame stream media. They give soft ball questions to the left giving us Hillary and attack the right until there is only a buffoon left.
Answer: | Yes
| 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: Addicts steal no matter if drugs are legal or not. No job and still want drug= illegal activities.
Solution: | Yes | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example solution: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: If I were a city planner, I'd say your behavior is bordering on criminal. Watching squirrels run after corn cobs ... sounds perverted. ;-)
| Solution: Yes | 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Reason: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this instance: Ahh you're right. I had my bored activists mixed up. I had forgotten how important an arctic cat jacket is amongst the issues of the day.
Student: | Yes | 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Why kill those who are supporting the state's economy? Most all money comes from the oil and gas, why kick them when they are down with HB 247?
The state AND the people have received decades of free income to pay for 90% of Government, plus a free fat bank account with almost $ 60 billion in it that also provides free money ( PFD check) to everyone each year!!
All this with no income tax, thanks to those people that risk money to drill and pay massive amounts daily in Royalty for the state and PFD!!
Sad that Rep GARA fails to write about it!
All this oil and gas money comes from land given to the state in 1959 not allowing the people to own the land which has lead to harsh rules that keep Alaskans and smaller competitors out of the business so the majors can have a monopoly!!
Now with oil prices having crashed and the oil industry is being killed off by Saudi's plan to stop US production we have this crazy HB 247 that is Hell Bent to run the oil companies out of business!! Why?
SOLUTION: Yes
PROBLEM: The GOP leadership has been hijacked by anti tax extremists, bought and sold by the oil industry. Meanwhile the ship is slowly sinking. I am afraid there is no real hope until these turkeys are removed from office.
SOLUTION: Yes
PROBLEM: All ivory trade should be banned
2015 25 walruses found dead near Cape Lisburne. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service determined the laughter was human caused. 1992 – A two year federal undercover operation interrupted one of the biggest wildlife slaughters in modern Alaska history; a grisly massacre of protected walruses providing ivory for the tourist trade. 2007 - Commentary by Paul Watson Founder and President of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society: Headless walrus are washing up on Alaskan beaches and narwhals are being pumped full of lead. Arctic wildlife is under assault in the quest for ivory and few dare question the losses for fear of being labeled racist. Additional stories, www.adn.com, search “ivory”. Alaska ivory poaching is on a par with African elephant ivory poaching.
SOLUTION: | Yes
| 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: It took Bin Ladin ten years to plan his attack in NY and DC. The CIA and FBI received plenty of tradecraft warning that Bin Ladin was going to reign terrorism on American soil and he did. Killing Bin Ladin obviously wasn't going to end Islamic extremism. Americans are foolish for blaming each other out of bigotry, racism, and good old fashion fear-mongering. A nation divided will indeed fuel the flames of terrorism. I don't believe for a moment that Mateen carried out his assault in Orlando because of Allah. He carried out his assault due to extreme mental illness and self-hatred. The Mateen's of this world will gun down or set off explosives and take as many innocent people with them. That's the reality. We're watching it unfold and appear helpless to stop it.
Solution: | Yes | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: Sounds like he feels he can "help" himself to others property. Theft of firearms is a serious charge and a huge mistake. He should be held just as accountable as any other thief, no matter what the circumstances that motivated him. It'll be hard to enjoy his good fortune in life from a penitentiary cell.
Example Output: No
Example Input: This driver, no doubt, was driving with a Class A CDL. CDL's manual required that drivers must look at least a quarter mile down the road and be aware of the environment and anticipate unexpected condition in the road or sides of the road. Unless the woman ran out in front of the truck, the drive should've slowed down and avoided hitting her.
Example Output: No
Example Input: It took Bin Ladin ten years to plan his attack in NY and DC. The CIA and FBI received plenty of tradecraft warning that Bin Ladin was going to reign terrorism on American soil and he did. Killing Bin Ladin obviously wasn't going to end Islamic extremism. Americans are foolish for blaming each other out of bigotry, racism, and good old fashion fear-mongering. A nation divided will indeed fuel the flames of terrorism. I don't believe for a moment that Mateen carried out his assault in Orlando because of Allah. He carried out his assault due to extreme mental illness and self-hatred. The Mateen's of this world will gun down or set off explosives and take as many innocent people with them. That's the reality. We're watching it unfold and appear helpless to stop it.
Example Output: | Yes
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: Of course, you wouldn't want to send a person to someplace where they might gain reasons to not drink. No, instead, we'll just suck them dry financially, physically, and spiritually by sending them to jail and then to a treatment program that teaches them that life has no meaning beyond this moment and that the only thing in life that matters is staying sober.
AA and other spiritually-based 12 Step programs are effective. That's why they're court-ordered. Medical and psychological "treatment" programs have huge failure rates -- almost double that of 12 Step programs. Having experience with the treatment programs through working in mental health, I believe its because they don't give the addict anything to replace the drugs with except will-power and cognitive exercises. It promotes hopelessness.
That said, not every program works for every addict. Diversity of choices is a good thing.
Solution: | Yes | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: I bet I could save a whole bunch of money if I privatized the management of the Marine Highways System. I might even hire some managers who gave a damn what it cost to run the Blue Canoes.
Answer: No
Question: “I think if you look at dinners and votes, there is no correlation.” "didn’t know who bought his tickets and didn’t ask."
Two politicians elected to represent all of their constituents who claim never to be influenced by the perks they receive from paid lobbists. Both claim to be above corruption and outside influence. Hmmm Somehow I find that very hard to believe!
I know what happens in the business world where business decisions are based on cost and effective return to the business, ie; profits and low cost operations which keep the business alive. A successful business does not pay $4 million a year rent when they can be successful paying $1 million.
The facts and events of the past 5 years of our legislative financial largess suggest that either our legislators are totally inept and short sighted or have been corrupted by those special interests supported by large $um$ of 'perks'. But since they don't care to ask?.......
Answer: Yes
Question: I hope my fellow civil readers, many of whom I disagree with on many issues, will join me in flagging your posts. This one and the one above suggesting Trump "have a fatal coronary," are completely uncivil.
I'm not racist, and nothing in my post even suggests that.
It's my country. I don't need to leave when I can work to make it better.
I don't smoke, and I rarely drink beer. I've never been on food stamps.
The elementary schools will soon be adding counselors to help kids like you.
Answer: | Yes
| 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Ex Input:
ADFG is not scientific but a federal court is? Who's playing politics?
Ex Output:
No
Ex Input:
The reasonable share that Norway receives is 78%. Not zero like us....they told the oil companies that was the cost and if they didn't like it they could go someplace else....and lo and behold the oil companies DIDN'T leave. But I guess Alaskans are more gullible than Norwegians.
Ex Output:
Yes
Ex Input:
early school start times have been shown to prove a negative for young bodies. yet we continue with same old same old. we'd have never built the al-can with that attitude. and please stop spending tax payer's money on advertising.
Ex Output:
| No
| 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: I do applaud the Register Guard for taking this step. Over the long haul it might lead to a more relaxed and fun forum for discussion. For a long time I called for the same policy online as in the paper itself, make people use their real names, as anonymity seemed to foster bullying. But I came to understand that wouldn't allow a city employee to call out dumb behavior by government, without their getting fired.
I do have some questions going forward, regarding just what is civil and what is not. I recognize bullying when I see it, as it strives to humiliate a fellow human. But if I call someone a nincompoop for tricking my country into a war, is that civil? How do I criticize dangerous behavior without going too far? Maybe a little more guidance as to what is considered civil would help. While civility is essential, so is honesty and clear language. Sometimes civility is just impossible. Would Michael Moore's movie, "Where to Invade Next", be seen as civil?
Hugh Massengill, Eugene
Solution: | Yes | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[EX Q]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ijaO8XBwMg&feature=youtu.be&app=desktop
[EX A]: No
[EX Q]: Excellent piece. People don't realize that it is ultimately the consumer who is pinched by these so-called business-only taxes; they are more or less pass-thru charges that hurt businesses (impairing their ability to compete with companies not exposed to the same taxes), workers (when costs of being in business go up, companies lay off workers), and consumers who pay higher prices for the same stuff as they did before. Enough is enough. Perhaps the hostile tax environment may be part of the reason that the economy is so services oriented in Oregon. A lot of the Fortune 500 companies have left. The problem with such a services-oriented economy is that it is not very flexible. So, when economic downturns come around every 8 years, or so, the Oregon and other services-oriented economies (e.g. Arizona) is hit harder than the national average; a lot of the money used to pay for those services is sourced from discretionary income. In recessions, people have less discretionary consumption.
[EX A]: No
[EX Q]: And the Louisiana Purchase? I suppose you studied in detail that long overnight meeting with Edward de Stoecki and William H. Seward, an expert in the Republican principals of Thomas Jefferson. Or would you like to steal it, as the democratic party did with New Mexico.
4 cents? http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=18
2 cents? http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=41
[EX A]: | No
| 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Part 2. Example
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Answer: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Part 3. Exercise
For NY and CA to raise their minimum wages does the rest of the country a favor. Business now concentrated in those states will move production and other functions to states suffering from lack of local opportunity.
Answer: | No | 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example solution: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: I'm not going to deny that there are some crazy-a**ed Mormons, but they're an insignificant minority. There was a reason the US put some serious restrictions on Utah's admission to the Union and some Mormons haven't accepted that. That said, they're a miniscule minority. Oh, and I'm not a Mormon, I'm not even a Christian.
| Solution: Yes | 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Disgusting......
Yes
I doubt Sowell dismisses the agency of African-Americans in the fight to end slavery. Next thing you'll say is the civil war was about states' rights and not slavery.
No
"They ignore the plain evidence of dozens of campuses in several states with combined decades of experience of legal carry on campus not producing -any- of the “fears and concerns” they state."
So why are negligent discharges up on campuses who've allowed concealed carry? Were you the "responsible gun owner" who left his shooting iron in the crapper last year at UAF? Or maybe 1/3 who've left unsecured firearms around in the past 3 months, also at UAF?
| No
| 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[EX Q]: Bravo, Wyatt! Some people have their heads in the clouds, when it should be here attending to reality.
[EX A]: Yes
[EX Q]: Hillarious ItsMe. I lived in Chicago for 8 years and never heard one gun shot and that was back in the mid to late 70s when the murder rate was double what it is now. I've lived in Anchorage for 11 years and have heard more gunshots within the city limits (excluding the gun range) than I can count on my fingers and toes.
[EX A]: No
[EX Q]: All people had to do was read the pamplet that was mailed out explaining SB21 before it was voted on to see it was terrible. Get rid of SB21 now! Dont take it personal big oil, its just bad business. Its very ignorant to put it bluntly.
[EX A]: | Yes
| 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Ex Input:
Maybe take away some TV shows, such as one where you take a pill and suddenly you're the all-powerful wizard, or some video games that advocate to kill in any way possible. Even cartoons are violent. But hey, I'm glad to know kids are eating seaweed! My Grandkids love it.
Ex Output:
No
Ex Input:
Once a caldera of foul wind, always a caldera of foul wind.
Ex Output:
No
Ex Input:
I think you don't have a firm grasp of reality. Sure it was nice to reward your oil company cronies with sb21, but the good days are over for them and for us. Before you come after our PFD and raid the CBR, you had better reestablish a fair tax system for the oil companies operating and still taking big profits from our state. We know we are going to have to pay an income tax to help sustain government and we know that is not enough and that you will need to access the PF, but you must begin to tax the oil companies in a fair and transparent manner. In the 36 years I have been a resident, I have never seen a more corrupt bunch than this current legislature. You Republicans have proven beyond any doubt that you are there to line your pockets and you seem to be beyond shame in doing so.
Ex Output:
| Yes
| 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: Hey...AK folks, almost same move the US government made on our Social Security funds...It is your money they are taking...What don't you understand
about they are (Taking) your $MONEY$....they are doing nothing to reduce the cost of Government...Read the (Purpose & Intent) of the Perm-Fund...Again it is (YOUR MONEY) IT IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE...YOU ARE
BEING ''SCREWED'' FOLKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A: No
****
Q: I agree that Trooper should have been fired. I suspect Monegan did to. However, the union would have filed a wrongful termination suit against the state, and that Trooper would have made a ton of money off being fired. Is that what you want? The union has rules on how and when Troopers can be fired. If that state doesn't follow those rules, the employee ends up winning, even if they suck.
A: Yes
****
Q: Yes.
Why would you even ask such a question? Have you ever considered that ramp-up in conjunction with the known outcome of SB 21 combined with foreign policy moves in the MidEast, Ukraine and Russia point at a contrived, i.e. engineered scheme with Alaska and other states as pawns to international intrigue?
A: | No
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: 1 in 9 have not been the victim of an assault. According to the survey, 1 in 9 have been victims of sexual misconduct or sexual assault. About 1 in 20 has been the victim of sexual assault.
Answer: Yes
Question: Those is charge now must then be representative of Criminal Defense Attorneys, because all they do now is lie about the outright crimes they're committing.
Answer: Yes
Question: I am home. So your view is that advocating elimination of feral CATS for the sake of public health makes me 'a beast and a murderer', but advocating the elimination of feral MOSQUITOES for the sake of public health doesn't? How do you figure, and on what basis?
Answer: | Yes
| 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Reason: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this instance: I remember Meyer being asked about the perceived conflict of interest with him voting on SB21 while being employed by Conoco Phillips. He said that there was no conflict of interest. That he wasn't management and wouldn't gain anything based on his vote.
He also stated that he was treated like any other employee at Conoco Phillips.
On the first point, his employer does influence his vote. If he doesn't think so, he should try promoting the repeal of SB21 and see how his employer reacts. I bet budget cuts would unfortunately result in his position being cut.
And the statement that he's just like any other employee at Conoco Phillips, I beg to differ. What other line employee at Conoco takes three or more months off a year? How necessary is your job if your employer can afford to have you gone for three or more months months a year. Do any of his coworkers get to do this? I really doubt it.
So, surprise, surprise. He is hugely influenced by his employer regardless of what he says.
Student: | No | 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Output: Yes
The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input case for you: And since she is more than three years younger than he is AND is under age 16, he can be adjudicated as a sex offender for life. That's on top of it being a Class C Felony.
Maybe our high schools need to have classes in avoiding stupidity.
Of course, if you consider how many high schools have 'educators' doing the same things or worse, (including Thurston High School just this year) maybe we would have to bring in a non-educator to provide the instruction.
Output: | Yes | 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[EX Q]: Garland supported the D.C. gun ban in 2007, thereby showing he opposes self-defense and opposes the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms. This exposed Garland as a left-wing loon activist unworthy of sitting in judgment on any court bench. I will support the GOP on saving tax payer funding on hearings blocking such left wing activist lunatics. No shame in this. Besides Harry Reid and the democrats Obstructionism set a model in place to follow.
[EX A]: Yes
[EX Q]: Exactly. We can't change the price of oil, but we can change our legislators.
Perhaps some day we'll look back and realize that the oil crash was the best thing to happen to us, since it exposed the legislators for who they really are. Not having money is a bad thing. Not having ethical leaders is a terrible thing.
[EX A]: No
[EX Q]: I remember Meyer being asked about the perceived conflict of interest with him voting on SB21 while being employed by Conoco Phillips. He said that there was no conflict of interest. That he wasn't management and wouldn't gain anything based on his vote.
He also stated that he was treated like any other employee at Conoco Phillips.
On the first point, his employer does influence his vote. If he doesn't think so, he should try promoting the repeal of SB21 and see how his employer reacts. I bet budget cuts would unfortunately result in his position being cut.
And the statement that he's just like any other employee at Conoco Phillips, I beg to differ. What other line employee at Conoco takes three or more months off a year? How necessary is your job if your employer can afford to have you gone for three or more months months a year. Do any of his coworkers get to do this? I really doubt it.
So, surprise, surprise. He is hugely influenced by his employer regardless of what he says.
[EX A]: | No
| 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Smith, you do realize that you are talking to people who came here only to have a bowel movement and not learn anything?
SOLUTION: Yes
PROBLEM: Thank you for your letter-Jayme...it needed to be said.
Many are very concerned about what is happening to our city
and want accountability to the taxpayers.
SOLUTION: No
PROBLEM: So now will the owner of the building come back with a huge discount on the rent or a deal on a buyout that includes the land?
SOLUTION: | No
| 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Let me give you an example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
The answer to this example can be: Yes
Here is why: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
OK. solve this:
Nice article photo. Give the editor and the photographer credit.
Answer: | No | 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: Thank you ADFG for protecting our hunting rights
A: | No | 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[Q]: Brian, thanks for very well written, but also disturbing, piece. You defend yourself very well against protestors and some iconic straw-man "the left" who accuse you, ironically, of believing what your candidate says he believes.
Will your vote determined by some angry protestors and "the left?" I certainly don't call you racist, sexist, or ignorant. But I do ask, will you vote for a man who says what Mr. Trump says about Mexicans, Muslims, blacks, and women? Who ignores decades of foreign policy, and jumps to dangerous conclusions repeatedly? Who promises to deport 11 million people? Who would exclude immigrants on the basis of religious beliefs? You redefine him as "a fighter." Do you just disbelieve everything he says?
And I'd join you, whole heartedly, in objecting to the name calling, polarizing, demeaning, common-enemy tactics of those protesters. ... if you weren't using them to defend a man whose campaign has ridden those same tactics to unprecedented levels.
[A]: Yes
[Q]: You would rather have Faux News?
[A]: No
[Q]: The military system, unlike the academic side of the U of O, more closely approaches a meritocracy. There are conditions, tasks and standards which must be met to succeed. The sports side also has that sort of system. One is required to meet or exceed standards or you lose your position, whether as a player or as a coach. The academic standards are subject to less rigor and certainty, based on my experience as a student. They more closely match with the rest of societies' concept of 'sucking up'. To get a good 'grade' one is required to parrot the information nearest and dearest to the heart of the instructors involved. I am given to understand that there is also a thing known as 'grade inflation' which is a corollary of the Lake Woebegone Principle that 'everyone is above average'. Those who successfully parrot the appropriate information are all then found to be in the highest percentile. These tendencies are most prevalent in the squishy 'sciences', of course.
[A]: | Yes
| 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example is below.
Q: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
A: Yes
Rationale: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: Good point cate arriola. I cant wait til they play videos of her claiming to be under machine gun fire in bosnia and then show the factual video. Amazing liar she is
A: | Yes | 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: OK, Jake, let's form a committee and sign me up. I'm serious. I want to leave my political action legacy. I'd love to go knowing that I help stop the Republicans and any other future majority in their corrupt tracks.
Example Output: No
Example Input: The last time we had a little violence in an election year it was Mayor Daley's thugs beating protester's during a Democratic Convention in Chicago.
"Outside the official convention proceedings, anti-war demonstrators clashed with 11,900 Chicago police, 7500 Army troops, 7500 Illinois National Guardsmen and 1000 Secret Service agents over 5 days."
These are just scuffles.
You can't have a Real riot without Democrats.
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: I guess I am just so proud of our congressional delegation…Three elected officials dan muk cow sky, liza sullivan and ding young. They haven’t held back helping any corporation in need, supporting the fossil fuel industry, full speed ahead with tax cuts for the wealthy, and corporations. Never a consideration for human rights, workers’ rights, public safety or even the environment. Maximum profit and no accountability just like their bosses the koch brothers preach, and for them to come together unanimously in support of trump, well it’s just another great moment in amerikan history.
Example Output: | No
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: Major colleges do because they draw over 50,ooo people per game for many football games and they get huge amounts of TV money. UAA hockey used to bring in enough to cover their costs and supply some money for other sports as well. They no longer bring in big money. On top of that , even with UAA students given free tickets and transportation to many events , around 90 percent don't even attend to support their own school. The UAA sports budget is around 10. 5 million a year , and they are trying to cut around 1.7 million. The ski team , track team , and gymnastic's teams should be cut without delay---for starters . The Shootout should be canceled after this year . My guess , and it's only a guess---is that all of UAA's sports teams draw around 500 grand total from all ticket sales from all the sports. Put another way---concerts held at the new sports arena do ten times better than all of UAA's sports teams put together .
Example Output: No
Example Input: I guess I'm still missing the part about he Republicans being exposed after the Garland nomination.
Example Output: No
Example Input: How many aliases have you used, Travis? You can run but you can't hide. Yeah, then quit trying to harass. I flag you every time.
Example Output: | No
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Part 2. Example
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Answer: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Part 3. Exercise
" Hi-Fi Music Hall, Broadway Metro, the WOW Hall and the McDonald Theater not only offer entertainment for millennials, but art that inspires. Groups like Harmonic Laboratory integrate dance and multimedia..." this is laughably pawned off as high tech jobs paying 50% better wages. Eugene can have a thriving economy based on finger painting and dancing!
Answer: | Yes | 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: And of course being so ethical you opted to keep the overage remaining after you bought your three squares a day and loved that TDY because you generally increased your take home three or four hundred a week.
Right?
A: No
****
Q: Once again less than 100 people in all the United States of America died from spice in 2014 meanwhile one person n the U.S. dies every 19 minutes from prescription meds. Where are you priorities? It's apparent that if you walked into your home and discovered a fire in the attic and a leaky faucet you'd grab a wrench and start working on the leak.
A: No
****
Q: RR: Crime of passion? You think this was about passion? Did you read his statement? She had asked him to put gun away cause he was drinking and come to bed. He then pointed the gun and pulled the trigger. Crime of passion denotes reason, he had none.
A: | No
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: A weirdo in a suit is still a weirdo
Solution: | Yes | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: More laws are needed to ensure homeschooling is conducted in a way that meets state educational standards, period. This nonsense about letting people do what ever they want is absolute idiocy. Of course, looks who's controlling Alaska state laws. THE IDIOTS
Solution: | Yes | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: I would like to see his phone....Texting?
Solution: | No | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Input: Consider Input: Native: It's affirming to read such a positive post.
My background is 28 years of teaching/counseling dysfunctional adolescents. So I've been called most everything you can imagine and many things you can't. Each of those exchanges was a opportunty to discuss both the source of the anger and, at the same time, consider other ways of dealing with issues.
While it's probably presumptuous of me, I'd like to be able to help Boozer deal with his anger involving the Markets. It "eats you away", both figuratively and literally, to spend your days with intense unresolved anger.
Thank you for your supportive words....regards, Gary
Output: No
Input: Consider Input: Mark Begich and Joe Murdey are your heroes.
Output: No
Input: Consider Input: As the saying goes - some people get so lost in the trees that they can't see the forest. Such is the case with Mr. Haycox. The reason politicians and most Alaskans not employed by local, federal or state government (as Mr. Haycox is) are anti-tax is not due to some allegiance to an idealist doctrine. It's because they understand what is going on. Low oil prices have resulted in massive carnage for the oil companies. Thousands of people have lost jobs. Budgets have been cut by billions. But at the same time our oil-fueled state government is non-responsive. A few symbolic cuts have been made. But absolutely nothing compared to the oil companies. Until the massive carnage of head and budget cuts is realized by the state government, there is no need to look at taxes. Mr. Haycox needs to pull his academic head out of the past and get in touch with the current reality in Alaska.
| Output: Yes
| 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Do you own a shotgun? Excellent. Take it out. Load it with one round, any shot will do. Now point it square at your TV. Release the safety. Pull the trigger.
Now doesn't that feel better?
No
The new math... 24 is equal to 12......again an embarrassment!
Yes
This article should be on the wedding announcements page. Who cares what she will be serving at her wedding?
| Yes
| 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: Now you are debating like a coward. It was an attack claiming privilege. I only went to school in England for 3 months than had to return due to finances. I dropped out at 14 rather than subject myself to the gross incompetence of Oregon public schools. I taught myself as poverty is no excuse, and it disgusts me to no end when people use poverty as an excuse for their failures. I never went to high school and yet I scored 79% higher on the GED than the national high school graduate taking the same tests. Furthermore, this forum does not allow me to post on everything you stated, you would understand that if you gave thought before speaking. (to be continued)
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: If I found a phone I'd call a recently dialed number or commonly dialed number and ask the person who answers who the phone belongs to. My own phone screen locks so I'm just out of luck if I leave it on the bus, although I never ride the bus in part because I'd be in close quarters with pervs like this.
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: "Political reality" is much more than just reverting to a rhetorical slogan. I would've figured that you knew that already based on most of your comments relating to things you that you support. There is over 85 synonyms for 'incongruent.' Take your pick, they are all correct.
Example Output: | No
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Sounds like he feels he can "help" himself to others property. Theft of firearms is a serious charge and a huge mistake. He should be held just as accountable as any other thief, no matter what the circumstances that motivated him. It'll be hard to enjoy his good fortune in life from a penitentiary cell.
answer:
No
question:
You really have zero idea how the rating agencies work.
answer:
No
question:
"Leave your entitled attitude behind when you leave anchorage. Drivers out here are not accustomed to this and are not expecting it."
"We are constantly ran off sidewalks by riders speeding by. The entitled attitudes are not endearing."
Seems that everyone believes that bicyclists are behaving "entitled". I side with the sidewalk pedestrians. Bikes are vehicles that belong on the roads. The car drivers should leave their entitled attitudes at home. Better yet, they should get their fat butts on a bicycle since most of them need the exercise.
answer:
| Yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Funny, an unconfirmed rumor story that's only been cited by you... Nice try, champ. The only place my handgun has ever been is with me. It is, after all, for my protection.
Answer: No
Question: Bet ya she can pronounce "Tanzania" and knows where it is and can even spell it. Trump is still looking on the map for Africa!
Answer: No
Question: Ooof. Probably needed but let's get the horrible tenants under control as well.
Answer: | Yes
| 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
The problem with too many lawyers is, they get paid as winners or losers. Why do you think the whole Nations in the toilet.
http://www.sheilajeffreys.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/toilet-article.pdfpublished-version.pdf
answer:
No
question:
These people are profoundly stupid. Lone Pine is an excellent example of what I am addressing. This local grower is not welcomed in downtown Eugene as they are openly discriminated against. LCFM prevents any and all growers from vending downtown Eugene who do not rip off the community gouging $1.50 for a single ear of corn.
answer:
Yes
question:
potluck anyone?
answer:
| No
| 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: only have of the voting age population votes in any given election. That has been the case for decades. It hasn't affected anything. We still get crap. Blame the lame stream media. They give soft ball questions to the left giving us Hillary and attack the right until there is only a buffoon left.
A: Yes
****
Q: Common sense and patriotism for your state and country went out the door when Money became the New Republican Jesus. Abolish the Party System and let's go back to being Americans. One person, one vote. Let `em all raise their own money for media and travel. Make this law for Alaska and watch the other states fall like dominoes.
A: No
****
Q: Lord knows running a city isn't a technical specialist, it's a professional bull&^%$er.
A: | Yes
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Like I said, even if she is a tramp, *that* has nothing to do with the crimes. But when trying to converse with someone who reverts to schoolyard name calling, it's a futile conversation.
answer:
Yes
question:
I'm not following. If he said there will not be a reduction to the general fund, and the county has in fact increased spending $5 million from the GF...how is that a reduction?
answer:
No
question:
Cowards on both sides of the aisle. The House Ds and Rs are equally to blame.
No wonder folks are voting for Trump.
answer:
| Yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Reason: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this instance: my problem is with the dumb headline. the man apparently died? no he did die- he was dead. man found dead in springfield duplex fire....doesn't say how or why. he was found dead. in springfield . in a duplex on fire. . it may have truly been grisly - not knowing....but my first thought was spontaneous human combustion. OHH - they added a sub header to the story ? regarding the cig? or did I miss that all together?
Student: | Yes | 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[Q]: Bill Boyd says that people are confused about rail. He also says that population along the route is already "above $600,000." Who's confused? Rail assumes that 15,000 people will walk to it. That's a joke because there is very little housing along the rail line. Mufi said that rail will be impossible to stop once it gets far enough along. In my opinion, the Final Environmental Impact Statement, which included the 15,000 projection, was the first step. Too much of it was fabricated. It was designed just to get the project started.
[A]: No
[Q]: Islam is synonymous with homophobia. They also treat their women like camel dung. Why are you coddling and protecting Islam?
http://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2016/06/12/orlando-night-club-attack-by-known-wolf-terrorist-previously-investigated-by-fbi/
[A]: Yes
[Q]: Speaking of hysteria did you happen to notice.
[A]: | No
| 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: Notice the crime scene tape around the campus. This payroll tax proposal is criminal as is the collusion that PDC, the city and Dr. Weiwel concocted to use urban renewal dollars to create a real estate portfolio of commercial spaces for PSU. Just say no to these criminals all around.
A: Yes
****
Q: Very Good APD ~ !
A: Yes
****
Q: When you consider yourselves above the law, you may do some really stupid things. The Bundy crew both did and did, and it's not working out real well for them. Papa Cliven and his buddies aren't doing well either.
There are ways to oppose the government w/o breaking the law. When individuals (on the right or the left) decide to use illegal means to "make their point", they need to be aware they may face the legal consequences of their acts.
A: | Yes
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: Send him to KPC, then.
Solution: | No | 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: What does the rest of the Trump cheerleading squad have to say about this?
http://www.adn.com/politics/article/donald-trump-campaign-unveils-alaska-supporters-including-treadwell-mcguire/2016/05/16/
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: Just make sure that not one watt goes to mining, not one public penny either. Never. Donlin Gold
(Barrick and Nova Gold) will use appoximately the same amount of natural gas (for instance) as Anchorage. Check the really awful human rights and environmental record of such companies who would come here to mine and use hydroelectricity. They would make a large take-home-out-of-Alaska profit if they could use hydroelectricity (at our land, water and state budget expense). Tell them to repair the lives, lands and waters they've damaged before they ever come here. Why was Jim Bowles, a Conoco Phillips executive on the board of the Nature Conservancy in a time of climate change? There should be an adversarial relationship between those trying to save the earth and those whose activities would destroy it. Are there mining executives on the board now?
Example Output: No
Example Input: Exactly. We can't change the price of oil, but we can change our legislators.
Perhaps some day we'll look back and realize that the oil crash was the best thing to happen to us, since it exposed the legislators for who they really are. Not having money is a bad thing. Not having ethical leaders is a terrible thing.
Example Output: | No
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[Q]: Just make sure that not one watt goes to mining, not one public penny either. Never. Donlin Gold
(Barrick and Nova Gold) will use appoximately the same amount of natural gas (for instance) as Anchorage. Check the really awful human rights and environmental record of such companies who would come here to mine and use hydroelectricity. They would make a large take-home-out-of-Alaska profit if they could use hydroelectricity (at our land, water and state budget expense). Tell them to repair the lives, lands and waters they've damaged before they ever come here. Why was Jim Bowles, a Conoco Phillips executive on the board of the Nature Conservancy in a time of climate change? There should be an adversarial relationship between those trying to save the earth and those whose activities would destroy it. Are there mining executives on the board now?
[A]: No
[Q]: Major colleges do because they draw over 50,ooo people per game for many football games and they get huge amounts of TV money. UAA hockey used to bring in enough to cover their costs and supply some money for other sports as well. They no longer bring in big money. On top of that , even with UAA students given free tickets and transportation to many events , around 90 percent don't even attend to support their own school. The UAA sports budget is around 10. 5 million a year , and they are trying to cut around 1.7 million. The ski team , track team , and gymnastic's teams should be cut without delay---for starters . The Shootout should be canceled after this year . My guess , and it's only a guess---is that all of UAA's sports teams draw around 500 grand total from all ticket sales from all the sports. Put another way---concerts held at the new sports arena do ten times better than all of UAA's sports teams put together .
[A]: No
[Q]: Agree,except the driver might have been texting (as opposed to drunk or drugged). Distracted driving kills.
The body cams are not a bad idea.
[A]: | Yes
| 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Ex Input:
What a pathetic waste of taxpayer dollars on this nonsensical criminalization of marijuana. Statistically alcohol causes many greater social problems. This man is not a threat to society. If they are determined to keep it illegal, then impose fines or something along those lines rather than locking people up. These arcane "lock 'em up" policies are simply fuel for the industrial prison complexes and those who profit from them. I personally choose not to use any intoxicants but I'm disgusted by the hypocrisy that some mind-altering drugs, like alcohol, can be openly promoted and sold, while others, like marijuana, are selectively enforced as a criminal substance.
Ex Output:
Yes
Ex Input:
Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail.
+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+ http://www.22moneybay.com
Ex Output:
No
Ex Input:
But if the government shuts down, how will your oily masters keep getting the giveaways that they in turn use to pay you to make ADN comments? Not that I wouldn't love to see you in line for the dole. Now THAT would be entertainment.
Ex Output:
| Yes
| 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: This would be a great addition to downtown and allow for housing that isn't targeted towards students, but instead towards townies. Although the rent seems high, anywhere in the urban core is pretty high nowadays.
SOLUTION: No
PROBLEM: I'm not saying anything. I'm trying to understand your question. If you'd like to audition to be a regular contributor, that's great. Drop us a line at the above address so we can get in touch about it. But know that you don't have to be a regular to send us a submission. We often publish commentary from members of the public.
SOLUTION: No
PROBLEM: Perhaps. All I know is that when I talk to Sanders supporters, they don't usually mention the "free stuff" and when they do, it's as a side remark, not their main point.
The media, however, went to town on the "free stuff" lines, but what the media or pundits say doesn't count.
SOLUTION: | No
| 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: You really have to learn something about the topic. Way back when they tried using testosterone. It didn't do anything (other than produce the sort of results that steroids generally do).
And every peer reviewed study I've ever seen on the subject has concluded that the hormone levels of transgendered individuals are completely normal (for their biological sex). So, unless you know something that medical researchers don't ....
Solution: | No | 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: Ian - actually the third reading clarified for me that the only folks winning in this are the attorneys and the Governor. We will end in the weeds looking for who said whom could ask for what long before any valid action, like a judge recusing himself or the 'right' person having authority, is fully addressed.
A: Yes
****
Q: J
Agreed...
these white welfare Sovereign Citizens brazenly breaking the law is sheer stupidity
the earth is really not owned by anyone anyway...we are just occupying it temporarily
is the east coast any better off with les govt. controlled land...no way!
A: Yes
****
Q: X, it's the choice of the individual and not yours .
The only effect on your life is what you chose to make it.
A: | No
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Addicts steal no matter if drugs are legal or not. No job and still want drug= illegal activities.
Answer: Yes
Question: Bingo!!
Answer: No
Question: As history have shown. Pre-K schooling does not determine a person's success in life.
Answer: | No
| 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: OK, Jake, let's form a committee and sign me up. I'm serious. I want to leave my political action legacy. I'd love to go knowing that I help stop the Republicans and any other future majority in their corrupt tracks.
Solution: | No | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Let me give you an example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
The answer to this example can be: Yes
Here is why: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
OK. solve this:
Your posts don't bother me, Donkel!
From the ridiculous, scary, baseless hyperbole to the UNNECESSARY CAPITALIZATION, I THINK you should KEEP ON DOING what you're DOING.
Answer: | Yes | 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: You do mean how well the economy did after republicans took control of the house after 40 some odd years? I thought you were. Republican obstructionism under Obama? I absolutely am grateful, that is why the deficits have come down and the debt is not at 25 or more trillion. Thank you republicans.
A: | No | 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example is below.
Q: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
A: Yes
Rationale: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: They cannot get the job done in Alaska or Washington with seniority. We elect the same people and expect different results. I am tired and frustrated of our leaders. Where are the statesmen????? Citizen legislators and not lifetime politicians are what we need.
A: | No | 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[EX Q]: The truth became arrogance at the dawn of political correctness: May 7th, 1994.
[EX A]: Yes
[EX Q]: If your idol Don Trump makes it to the White House, he'll hold the record for presidents with multiple divorces, bankruptcies, verbal insults, and vile attacks on women.
[EX A]: Yes
[EX Q]: They cannot get the job done in Alaska or Washington with seniority. We elect the same people and expect different results. I am tired and frustrated of our leaders. Where are the statesmen????? Citizen legislators and not lifetime politicians are what we need.
[EX A]: | No
| 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: Actually, I kind of like Trump.
A: | No | 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: You've tried to run a campaign several times, Fluetsch. Why don't you organize a write-in campaign and unseat your district's incumbent? Put up or shut up.
Solution: | Yes | 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Subsets and Splits