Dataset Viewer
inputs
stringlengths 124
2.83k
| targets
stringclasses 12
values | _template_idx
int64 0
9
| _task_source
stringclasses 1
value | _task_name
stringclasses 1
value | _template_type
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[Q]: Your posts don't bother me, Donkel!
From the ridiculous, scary, baseless hyperbole to the UNNECESSARY CAPITALIZATION, I THINK you should KEEP ON DOING what you're DOING.
[A]: Yes
[Q]: If I found a phone I'd call a recently dialed number or commonly dialed number and ask the person who answers who the phone belongs to. My own phone screen locks so I'm just out of luck if I leave it on the bus, although I never ride the bus in part because I'd be in close quarters with pervs like this.
[A]: Yes
[Q]: They are already blaming others, the hypocrisy is pathetic.
[A]: | Yes
| 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: You're right, it could. However, I'd still have more control as an end user.
A: No
****
Q: Talking to the homeless, alcoholics, addicts and anyone that presented with a diagnosed psychological or neurological disorder and writing an after report was only part of what a post grad psychologist did to relieve the case backlog around 116th St in Manhattan in 1970 at Columbia. The problems people present today are the manifest same as their parents. Whatever they are or are doing isn't subject to your approval for public funding. You may not give, grant nor award public funds to be used for anything with any qualifying exception of any otherwise acceptable or legal behavior that you or any group don't happen to approve of. Nick, this isn't a primer on alcohol or drugs in shelters. It's about addressing homelessness and we don't have to solve all societies ills before we start. It's about civic responsibility.Lastly, I know the Catholic church has stepped forward and picked up the responsibility that should be the states. The state should take the lead.
A: No
****
Q: it is amazing that someone, somehow, did not step in and "stop" this guy. with PTSD he should not have been living by a park, had access to a gun or just plain walking the streets. hate to say it, but jails are made for people like this - menaces to everyone else. the system did fail us.
A: | Yes
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: Unbelievable! Tell him to keep his kids off your property or you might have to defend it.
Solution: | No | 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Let me give you an example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
The answer to this example can be: Yes
Here is why: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
OK. solve this:
please resign from School Board Pat, you are not focused on kids anymore, or the Board.
Answer: | No | 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Ex Input:
Who is " quiet and effective"? This anonymity lacks transparency which I thought was a Civil Beat goal.
Ex Output:
No
Ex Input:
It's been my observation that our Air-Force pilots aren't arrogant, thinking that ground-support is beneath them, but rather, that it is a lot more dangerous than air-to-air combat. And the infantry holds the A-10, and its pilots in high esteem. 15's, 16's, Tornado's, all were too vulnerable below 10k. A-10s were so low and slow, they could give the enemy a haircut, and come home with holes in the wings big enough to almost drive a compact car through. most important though, was that the A-10 pilots were able to fly low and close enough, to see who was enemy, and who was friendly.
Ex Output:
Yes
Ex Input:
please resign from School Board Pat, you are not focused on kids anymore, or the Board.
Ex Output:
| No
| 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[Q]: A state GOP politician has been 'reprimanded' for attempting to 'seek bipartisanship?' Does anybody find that odd?
[A]: No
[Q]: Stupid crap. Spend the money on more bridges over the ala wai. Oh no... Maikiki might get pissed. WEAK governing rules!!!
[A]: Yes
[Q]: You write like you're the one that wrote Lynn Gattis' talking point about doing away with the senior citizens, Gay. How much did you get paid for that script?
[A]: | Yes
| 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example is below.
Q: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
A: Yes
Rationale: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: This article should be on the wedding announcements page. Who cares what she will be serving at her wedding?
A: | Yes | 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Ex Input:
Nah, if pharmacists and bar tenders can figure it out, so can dispensaries.
Ex Output:
No
Ex Input:
What a load of GARBAGE TUCK! Seriously? Tuck: "i'm not coming because you won't give us A,B, and C". There are cuts across the board and Tuck is acting like a fool, Walker is all "keep on keeping on" while he sits by sipping a margarita watching building renovations. What a bunch of hypocritical, greedy, unintelligent, waste of space people. I too elect to write some columns, a 10-part column about recalling these failures of Alaska. You're paid to do a job and they screw around. Guess what tuck, programs and benefits will be cut...sorry, welcome to the real world. And Walker...just leave. Anyone else not wanting to do their part? I'll draw you a map to the border.
Ex Output:
Yes
Ex Input:
You cant be a student athlete without being a student, Vernon had to be in a graduate program of some kind, same for Dakota
Ex Output:
| No
| 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: WW deleted all the peoples comments defending Voodoo. This is a smear campaign. Working at Voodoo is awesome!
SOLUTION: No
PROBLEM: Once again less than 100 people in all the United States of America died from spice in 2014 meanwhile one person n the U.S. dies every 19 minutes from prescription meds. Where are you priorities? It's apparent that if you walked into your home and discovered a fire in the attic and a leaky faucet you'd grab a wrench and start working on the leak.
SOLUTION: No
PROBLEM: Good luck selling a spring fur to anyone but another cheechako. I'm currently writing a book on Alaska Native fur clothing. Years of research. How about you?
SOLUTION: | No
| 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: Or move out of the LIO and into a building that the state already owns.
SOLUTION: No
PROBLEM: All people had to do was read the pamplet that was mailed out explaining SB21 before it was voted on to see it was terrible. Get rid of SB21 now! Dont take it personal big oil, its just bad business. Its very ignorant to put it bluntly.
SOLUTION: Yes
PROBLEM: Pete Kelly is a low life. He gives politicians a bad name.
SOLUTION: | Yes
| 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Why? The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input: Good luck selling a spring fur to anyone but another cheechako. I'm currently writing a book on Alaska Native fur clothing. Years of research. How about you?
Solution: | No | 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: potluck anyone?
A: | No | 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Why? The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input: Mr. Haycox, your op-ed hit the nail on the head, but I think you were too generous not to identify that Trump may very well be the anti-Christ and that's why he has the following that he does. The anti-Christ will dazzle and promise his followers everything they ask for but won't deliver. Yep. That's Trump alright. Naysayers posting their thoughts on this op-ed feel the sting because they know what you wrote is the truth. Denial is everything. Ha
Solution: | Yes | 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: "Blindly supporting someone because of party affiliation..............skills". She would be a disaster in the White House.
A: Yes
****
Q: Are you kidding me ? How does saying Obama is incompetent translate into " hatred " ? Obama is clearly our worst president of all time---saying that doesn't mean I hate the guy. Heck , I even showed up to watch his car drive past when he visited Anchorage. Wearing my Trump T-shirt of course. It's sad that just because a person disagree's with one's thoughts on an issue---they are called a hater.
A: Yes
****
Q: Yeah, like law-abiding citizens who over react and shoot their neighbor' dog? To tell the truth, at his point, and as a gun owner myself, I'm actually more afraid of the law abiding "good guy with a gun" than I am of the "bad guy" with a gun.
A: | Yes
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: Speaking of hysteria did you happen to notice.
Solution: | No | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: But if the government shuts down, how will your oily masters keep getting the giveaways that they in turn use to pay you to make ADN comments? Not that I wouldn't love to see you in line for the dole. Now THAT would be entertainment.
A: | Yes | 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Alaska Citizens to Senate: Why did you waste all your time on stuff like guns on campus instead of THE ISSUE, the Budget!!!!!
answer:
No
question:
I guess I am just so proud of our congressional delegation…Three elected officials dan muk cow sky, liza sullivan and ding young. They haven’t held back helping any corporation in need, supporting the fossil fuel industry, full speed ahead with tax cuts for the wealthy, and corporations. Never a consideration for human rights, workers’ rights, public safety or even the environment. Maximum profit and no accountability just like their bosses the koch brothers preach, and for them to come together unanimously in support of trump, well it’s just another great moment in amerikan history.
answer:
No
question:
OK, what is with this screwy part of this new comment system: I replied to my2cents with "No, it would have to be some modification of a hot air balloon to qualify.: and I get an endless loop of responding to the same post to rate that doesn't allow my post to enter the lineup. What's up with that? It's happened several times and you can NEVER get out of it.
answer:
| No
| 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[EX Q]: I've been gone, when do think we last had a beautiful city?
A thousand free weed whackers circulating in Eugene would go a long way in most neighborhoods. So much of what I see is simple decay of older structures.
And I would add a lot of individual decisions on property care that goes with very lax standards. Would asking a person to cut down weeds be a violation of their freedom of choice?
[EX A]: Yes
[EX Q]: Guestsquared: It's really too bad you can't manage to discuss an issue without inserting one or more personal insults. Again, may I suggest disagreeing with you on this issue or any other does make a person, ipso facto, "ill-informed." I could reply with a like comment and we could waste time and energy exchanging insults. I'm not interested in doing that.
We know, although you and the others who support this law will never acknowledge it, that it was specifically written to "discourage" panhandling by punishing anyone who donats to panhandlers from a car. This ban, of course, eliminates the primary source of contributions to panhandlers. It's designed to give Springfield panhandlers the "bum's rush", while hopefully passing the test of its Constitutionality. It may be supported by the Courts, it may not be. As I've repeatedly said, that is the Courts' responsibility. We'll likely get to see how it "plays out."
[EX A]: Yes
[EX Q]: Send him to KPC, then.
[EX A]: | No
| 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: OK, what is with this screwy part of this new comment system: I replied to my2cents with "No, it would have to be some modification of a hot air balloon to qualify.: and I get an endless loop of responding to the same post to rate that doesn't allow my post to enter the lineup. What's up with that? It's happened several times and you can NEVER get out of it.
Solution: | No | 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Let me give you an example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
The answer to this example can be: Yes
Here is why: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
OK. solve this:
Perhaps. All I know is that when I talk to Sanders supporters, they don't usually mention the "free stuff" and when they do, it's as a side remark, not their main point.
The media, however, went to town on the "free stuff" lines, but what the media or pundits say doesn't count.
Answer: | No | 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
If they were acquiring the A320s they could turn around and sell them, if they don't want to operate a mixed fleet. At least they'd get some of their $2.6 billion back. So it certainly makes sense to factor in the planes.
If they go to an all Boeing fleet, all the Virgin employees are going to have to be trained on the 737, from pilot training to ground logistics. It's going to be expensive, no matter which way they go.
answer:
No
question:
" everything that's old is aew again"
That's a classic symptom of Alzheimer's.
answer:
No
question:
Not that this has anything to do with taxes, or unions, but – since Boozer brought it up – aren't we all pretty sure that educated is better than ignorant? And that people who run businesses are more likely to be educated than ignorant? If you'd like data on that one, The Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurship (kauffman.org), probably the most respected non-government source for information on entrepreneurship, has studies showing that 91% of successful entrepreneurs have college degrees. Although, like another commenter here, I like the irony of "educated morons." And I'd never argue that there aren't a lot of ignorant people with degrees.
answer:
| Yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[Q]: All ivory trade should be banned
2015 25 walruses found dead near Cape Lisburne. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service determined the laughter was human caused. 1992 – A two year federal undercover operation interrupted one of the biggest wildlife slaughters in modern Alaska history; a grisly massacre of protected walruses providing ivory for the tourist trade. 2007 - Commentary by Paul Watson Founder and President of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society: Headless walrus are washing up on Alaskan beaches and narwhals are being pumped full of lead. Arctic wildlife is under assault in the quest for ivory and few dare question the losses for fear of being labeled racist. Additional stories, www.adn.com, search “ivory”. Alaska ivory poaching is on a par with African elephant ivory poaching.
[A]: Yes
[Q]: HOW in the heck can anyone from Alaska even begin to think there is no global warming? I live in the same town, Wasilla, and we are having one heck of an early spring. Beyond anything I've seen in my 38 years in Alaska. It is really nice outside and as for global warming and living in Alaska, bring it on! lol....
[A]: Yes
[Q]: How lame. Oh I didn't know my husband had a gold mine!
[A]: | No
| 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Output: Yes
The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input case for you: X, it's the choice of the individual and not yours .
The only effect on your life is what you chose to make it.
Output: | No | 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: ahh. see, your being obtuse. you're obtuse a lot.
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: Does Imago Dei allow women to preach when they are menstruating?
There's a ton of stuff about a woman's period in the Bible.
“When a woman has a discharge, and the discharge in her body is blood, she shall be in her menstrual impurity for seven days, and whoever touches her shall be unclean until the evening. And everything on which she lies during her menstrual impurity shall be unclean. Everything also on which she sits shall be unclean. And whoever touches her bed shall wash his clothes and bathe himself in water and be unclean until the evening. And whoever touches anything on which she sits shall wash his clothes and bathe himself in water and be unclean until the evening. Whether it is the bed or anything on which she sits, when he touches it he shall be unclean until the evening. ...
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: I wish people would understand that "worshiping" or following a deeply held religious faith, regardless of the sect, denomination, etc. is more than just what happens on Sunday morning from 11am-noon. Religious faith and religious life is not a suit one wears one day in a week, and then one puts on a different suit for the remainder of the week. True faith affects a person's every action. It forms one's view of the world. Requiring Christians to help facilitate something their faith strongly condemns, e.g. baking a wedding cake, photographing a wedding, counseling a same-sex couple etc., is in the same vein as forcing a conscientious objector to go to war. We don't force C.O.'s into the Army, many of whom have religious objections; why do we force other people of faith to go against their religious objections? If the First Amendment is to be anything more than feel-good legislation, then people of faith must be allowed to live that faith every day-even if it isn't popular with others.
Example Output: | Yes
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: "Duplicitous criminal?"
Sorry, friend, but one doesn't get to make up charges. I'm unaware of any charges, much less convictions, of our former Secretary of State.
I am also unaware of any grandiose promises she has made that are unreachable, assuming we don't have a continuance of our "No!" congressional Republican leadership.
As for that 1% thing: I applaud a person that is willing to sacrifice for the general good. You aren't envious of her wealth, are you?
Far more disturbing is a billionaire like Trump saying this country sucks and who wants to give himself and his cronies unprecedented MAJOR tax cuts.
Hillary may be a somewhat jelly-like centrist, but she's no hate-filled greed ball like Trump.
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: This article should be on the wedding announcements page. Who cares what she will be serving at her wedding?
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: In my opinion, these charges are based on unfounded accusations and lies. Sad that this can lead to a person getting charged with a crime and having it show up in the paper. Hopefully WW will post again when she is proved innocent.
Example Output: | No
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: In my opinion, these charges are based on unfounded accusations and lies. Sad that this can lead to a person getting charged with a crime and having it show up in the paper. Hopefully WW will post again when she is proved innocent.
Solution: | No | 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Let me give you an example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
The answer to this example can be: Yes
Here is why: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
OK. solve this:
Not that this has anything to do with taxes, or unions, but – since Boozer brought it up – aren't we all pretty sure that educated is better than ignorant? And that people who run businesses are more likely to be educated than ignorant? If you'd like data on that one, The Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurship (kauffman.org), probably the most respected non-government source for information on entrepreneurship, has studies showing that 91% of successful entrepreneurs have college degrees. Although, like another commenter here, I like the irony of "educated morons." And I'd never argue that there aren't a lot of ignorant people with degrees.
Answer: | Yes | 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Input: Consider Input: Boozer: I'm guessing the Courts will eventually decide if this ban is a "traffic safety matter" or a blatant attempt to circumvent the Constitutional Protections provided by the First Amendment.
I've yet to read of a single incident of a traffic accident being caused by someone passing spare change to a panhandler. I've yet to read of a single incident of a panhandler being struck by a vehicle.
If you follow the "traffic safety" logic, Springfield should make it completely illegal for pedestrians to cross main street. Why don't you tally the number killed crossing that street and compare it to the number of panhandlers struck by vehicles.
The proposed ban is, indeed, that "end run" I suggest. I don't expect the City or any supporters of the ban to acknowledge this (although a few posters on this site have done so). I don't expect the Police Chief to acknowledge it. I don't expect the City Council to acknowledge it. I don't expect Springfield's attorneys to acknowledge it
Output: No
Input: Consider Input: The news is people fall for this stuff.
Output: Yes
Input: Consider Input: You really have to learn something about the topic. Way back when they tried using testosterone. It didn't do anything (other than produce the sort of results that steroids generally do).
And every peer reviewed study I've ever seen on the subject has concluded that the hormone levels of transgendered individuals are completely normal (for their biological sex). So, unless you know something that medical researchers don't ....
| Output: No
| 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: Common sense and patriotism for your state and country went out the door when Money became the New Republican Jesus. Abolish the Party System and let's go back to being Americans. One person, one vote. Let `em all raise their own money for media and travel. Make this law for Alaska and watch the other states fall like dominoes.
A: No
****
Q: Damn, Celia! Seems EVERYBODY is out to get you! You must be really important!
A: Yes
****
Q: My cat objects. There is nothing like putting a strip of gorilla tape over a tic on a cat.
Forgiveness isn't part of it. :)
A: | No
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Ex Input:
Yes.
Why would you even ask such a question? Have you ever considered that ramp-up in conjunction with the known outcome of SB 21 combined with foreign policy moves in the MidEast, Ukraine and Russia point at a contrived, i.e. engineered scheme with Alaska and other states as pawns to international intrigue?
Ex Output:
No
Ex Input:
Jade: "modesly" is actually an innovative contraction peculiar to discussion of housing patterns, urban demographics and inner-city residential development. Its etymology is traced to discussion of "more densely" developed urban centers especially in reference to residential units. In today's usage you might read "modesly" devloped city centers generally promote more affordable urban residential tenancy. Indeed, it is an esoteric term and it's not surprising it causes some confusion.
You may be thinking of "scrupub", which, in contemporary use, refers to policies and legislation designed to benefit a small special interest group by "screwing the public."
Ex Output:
No
Ex Input:
Weird. I hear a koo-koo clock, but I don't own one.
Ex Output:
| No
| 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Output: Yes
The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input case for you: No, THE PEOPLE don't elect the Senate. THE PEOPLE elect the President. But I suspect you already know that.
Output: | No | 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Part 2. Example
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Answer: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Part 3. Exercise
How many US military died in Iraq during W's presidency, compared to Obama's?
Answer: | No | 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Output: Yes
The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input case for you: Thomas R. Wilson - Your argument could be expanded to justify the legislature being in continuous session. Don't scoff. That is exactly why the US Congress is in nearly perpetual session. They weren't supposed to be and it has had far ranging consequences. We shouldn't want to go there.
The Alaska Leg session was originally only supposed to be 90 days, according to the State Constitution. Some other states have much shorter sessions and manage to get things done.
The length of session is not the problem. The legislators need to prioritize. Constitutionally, the ONLY job they have is passing a budget. They could do that in 90 days if they concentrated. Watch 360 North's Gavel to Gavel sometime and you'll see a lot of wasted time. If they started with the budget and, then, if they had time, they did these other things ... that would solve the problem right there. Lengthening the session would only encourage them not to get the work done.
Output: | No | 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[EX Q]: What's the matter Kylie? Are women's opinion's a threat to your ilk? Bet you're a supporter of the Un-Americans for Disparity and the Alaska Policy Forum who's trying to gut Alaska's public school system. I'll be women have bigger jewels than you. Right?
[EX A]: No
[EX Q]: HOW in the heck can anyone from Alaska even begin to think there is no global warming? I live in the same town, Wasilla, and we are having one heck of an early spring. Beyond anything I've seen in my 38 years in Alaska. It is really nice outside and as for global warming and living in Alaska, bring it on! lol....
[EX A]: Yes
[EX Q]: No, THE PEOPLE don't elect the Senate. THE PEOPLE elect the President. But I suspect you already know that.
[EX A]: | No
| 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Too bad Jolly is getting so little support. Even worse, I would guess a majority of the voting public is unaware of the time their representatives spend fund raising.
Very few people would argue that large private institutions have influence on legislation. At best, money donations provide very unequal access to those who guide legislation through congress. At worst, it's a legal bribe.
We've put our legislators and in a position of begging, not leading, Sadly, it is the professional leadership of The Party that makes sure it's members play nice and cooperate - or they don't get their share of the booty.
My hat is off for the brave few, like Jolly and Nolan, who are trying to shed the light on a corrupt process.
answer:
No
question:
only have of the voting age population votes in any given election. That has been the case for decades. It hasn't affected anything. We still get crap. Blame the lame stream media. They give soft ball questions to the left giving us Hillary and attack the right until there is only a buffoon left.
answer:
Yes
question:
"Her most powerful message against Trump might be a non-ideological one: His lack of knowledge, seriousness and impulse control make him too dangerous to put in the presidency."
This is actually a better description of Clinton. Plus of course her sense of entitlement and belief that laws don't apply to her coupled with her dishonesty. Yeah, disqualified!
answer:
| Yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Reason: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this instance: Thank god the university has piles of spare money sitting around. Now if we could only give them guns to pass out to students....
Student: | No | 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Let me give you an example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
The answer to this example can be: Yes
Here is why: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
OK. solve this:
Just think,he is still 10000 times better a choice than bullary. Put that in your bong and hit it
Answer: | Yes | 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
How is it impractical (aka unfair) to expect communities to take responsibility for themselves? It sounds like some of these communities in question are, in and of themselves, impractical if they can't survive without handouts from the government. The obligation is theirs. It sounds pretty ridiculous to claim that "forcing the obligations" of their own existence upon them is somehow wrong.
Yes
Democratic counterpart has not presented him with a list of specific demands and “needs to come to the table and talk.” What if your counterpart said,"DON'T BUY THAT DAMN GLASS BUILDING. ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR RABBIT ASS MIND." What if he said that?
Yes
Just think,he is still 10000 times better a choice than bullary. Put that in your bong and hit it
| Yes
| 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: Homeless camp. Shocking. My wife and I walk the trials all summer and winter. Geocachers. I could show you so much crap......trash. dangers it is unreal. Of course they saw nobody. they bail. Who and how else would this have started
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/04/17/is-veganism-good-for-everyone/meat-is-brain-food
Example Output: No
Example Input: Read this and tell us the same thing. http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/10/us/stanford-rape-case-court-documents/
Example Output: | No
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[Q]: The last time we had a little violence in an election year it was Mayor Daley's thugs beating protester's during a Democratic Convention in Chicago.
"Outside the official convention proceedings, anti-war demonstrators clashed with 11,900 Chicago police, 7500 Army troops, 7500 Illinois National Guardsmen and 1000 Secret Service agents over 5 days."
These are just scuffles.
You can't have a Real riot without Democrats.
[A]: Yes
[Q]: Xavier: It's interesting that some folks (including, it seems, you) are blaming Mr. Clark's loss on his running a lackluster campaign. From all I saw and read, he campaigned quite hard. I saw about 10 to 1 more Clark signs and only Clark billboards. I think he also worked to present himself as a rightg-of-center candidate. There's also the possibility that Ms. Vinis, campaigning as a progressive who would follow the same general philosophy as Mayor Piercy, was simply more to the liking of the voters.
[A]: Yes
[Q]: Wiewel ought to have a REMAX jacket on. He's great at playing footsie with the real estate weasels.
[A]: | Yes
| 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[EX Q]: "SWAG" stands for Scientific Wild-Assed Guess. It's what passes for science when the science doesn't truly exist.
I chose a random date because no one can give an answer to my question whether I suggest a date of tomorrow, 5 years from now, 10 years from now or any other date. The science to answer that question does not exist!
Nor does the science to answer my second question. Why should the society write a multi-billion dollar blank check for something which not only doesn't currently exist but for which a theory hasn't even been developed?
As an agnostic, I resent your attempt to knock my argument down by labeling my response as 'sinful religious conservatism'.
I am a conservative; I will not pay for a pig in a poke when you can't even tell me the size of the poke or the gender of the pig or anything else about this alleged pig which no one has ever seen. Try selling me a unicorn; you will get the same response.
[EX A]: Yes
[EX Q]: The only people attacking are the religious right, this issue has been to the supreme court and yet these superstitious legislators cant stop attacking civil liberties.
[EX A]: No
[EX Q]: Save your money Trump, Eugene is a leftist hotbed, and they would vote for Karl Marx before they would vote for you.
If you do come, let's pray the residents don't get violent and burn the town down.
[EX A]: | Yes
| 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Output: Yes
The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input case for you: You would rather have Faux News?
Output: | No | 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Test on humans. We're animals too. But oh, right, we're "special" animals because ... why?
No
ya know ...I think that is a pretty accurate, concise assessment. it is why the campaign agenda/promises are never fully carried out if at all.
No
Makes you wonder how many feds were involved in permitting Shell. Or maybe they all just are having drugs and prostitution with industry? Where were Alaska reporters when Shell Oils illegal lease sales were being manipulated by corrupt DOI federal officials? I'm sure Pebble Partnership likes to wine and dine officials that only permit industry projects, not support science-based permitting decisions. Maybe Pebble needs to learn from Shell Oil company to make permits and leases go industry style.
http://www.wyofile.com/specialreport/feds-gone-wild-part-1/
| Yes
| 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Reason: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this instance: Or move out of the LIO and into a building that the state already owns.
Student: | No | 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
The Pope should concern himself with issues surrounding his faith, and keep his nose out of OUR problem of illegal immigration.
Yes
Native: It's affirming to read such a positive post.
My background is 28 years of teaching/counseling dysfunctional adolescents. So I've been called most everything you can imagine and many things you can't. Each of those exchanges was a opportunty to discuss both the source of the anger and, at the same time, consider other ways of dealing with issues.
While it's probably presumptuous of me, I'd like to be able to help Boozer deal with his anger involving the Markets. It "eats you away", both figuratively and literally, to spend your days with intense unresolved anger.
Thank you for your supportive words....regards, Gary
No
Or move out of the LIO and into a building that the state already owns.
| No
| 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: Does Imago Dei allow women to preach when they are menstruating?
There's a ton of stuff about a woman's period in the Bible.
“When a woman has a discharge, and the discharge in her body is blood, she shall be in her menstrual impurity for seven days, and whoever touches her shall be unclean until the evening. And everything on which she lies during her menstrual impurity shall be unclean. Everything also on which she sits shall be unclean. And whoever touches her bed shall wash his clothes and bathe himself in water and be unclean until the evening. And whoever touches anything on which she sits shall wash his clothes and bathe himself in water and be unclean until the evening. Whether it is the bed or anything on which she sits, when he touches it he shall be unclean until the evening. ...
Solution: | Yes | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: The "man bites dog" story has evolved into "man shoots dog"---A comment on our heavily armed 2nd Amendment society.
Condolences for the loss of your dog, a family member. Condolences also to the man who felt he had to shoot it. Bear in mind that no one planned this---It was an unfortunate convergence of circumstances involving a small child, an aggressive dog, and a man with a gun; one that all parties have to now move forward on, as neighbors. Let APD do their jobs, and try to work toward forgiving each other
A: No
****
Q: If I recall the details correctly, Reynolds was an applicant for the job Gissiner got, then she stayed on in her former position, subsequently being fired by Gissiner.
Now, is it any surprise that the person who got the job would find some reason to fire his main potential rival? No, not at all, nor is it a surprise that she'd sue.
The sensible procedure for the City would have been to recognize the all too common political and personal dynamics in Reynolds's firing, and compensate her, without throwing away even more money in fighting what was almost a slam dunk on Reynolds part.
A: No
****
Q: The truth became arrogance at the dawn of political correctness: May 7th, 1994.
A: | Yes
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: Thank you for your letter-Jayme...it needed to be said.
Many are very concerned about what is happening to our city
and want accountability to the taxpayers.
Solution: | No | 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[Q]: Funny that the cake case should be brought up by this writer. Local and state laws force religious dissenters who don't want their product in a homosexual ceremony that their genuine religious beliefs find disgusting and abhorrent, and against their beliefs but the Obama EEOC just ruled that Muslim Somali drivers who took jobs as delivery drivers can refuse to carry liquor based on the very religious beliefs the States, and local laws deny the religious dissenters.
So one set of rules for Muslims and another for Christians here in freedom loving America founded by peoples seeking religious freedom?
No double standard here?
[A]: Yes
[Q]: There they go trying to buy elections. They see the writing on the wall and of course their underhanded tendencies will continue; it's all they have left...money #koch brother mentality. Oh, and watch someone pull Soros out of their butt.
[A]: Yes
[Q]: Thank you for your letter-Jayme...it needed to be said.
Many are very concerned about what is happening to our city
and want accountability to the taxpayers.
[A]: | No
| 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: Is your real name Dick Cheney?
A: | Yes | 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: Well said Paul, you made your point clear. With all the complaining about "government regulations" we forget that most rules are designed to protect property owners and users from unwanted intrusions. Just as theaters have every right to tell Mister Kahle to turn off his cell phone and stop chatting.
A: | No | 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Let me give you an example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
The answer to this example can be: Yes
Here is why: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
OK. solve this:
But killing a cyclist when you are drunk, high and driving backwards down a road is not an "accident". So Ellis getting 3 months for killing a person is obscene when this dude gets 15 years for 8600 dollars worth of fraud. A human life is at least a thousand more times as valuable as $8600. So a thousand times 15 years is 15,000 years. That would be a sentence more appropriate for Ellis. 3 months is a freakin' joke.
Answer: | No | 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Reason: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this instance: Rivers Need Water! What will EWEB do to offset or mitigate the environmental impact of removing this water from the Wilamette? Fish mortality and water temperature and turbidity is already a problem, and removing 1% of the flowrate, although small, could have consequences that have not yet been realized. I hope the Macauley family trust holds on to the land and challenges eminent domain with environmental logic.
Student: | Yes | 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: The fact that some children get a poor education is indisputable -- that goes for homeschooled and public schooled kids. What checks and balances could actually prevent this? Public schools have gone to more and more and more standardized tests (most AK homeschoolers aren't independent and also take these) and attempts to legislate that everyone score well. How well does that work? As for homeschoolers, you could add more paperwork. Some states do. Someone willing to hide their kids in the basement is probably cool with fudging or skipping the paperwork. Internet forums abound with instructions on how to get through paperwork hoops. Do we send inspectors to every home? Whose standards do they use? "Checks and Balances" is a good idea, truly, but only if we think through what checks are effective, practical, and don't cause more harm than they prevent. Ideas?
Example Output: No
Example Input: Clowns
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: I meant to spell "invested" in my comment above - but "infested would have worked too! :>)
Example Output: | No
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: It is still a research university. The review is if it should still be one of the 62 AAU member universities. Oregon State is not AAU, but is a research university. If Oregon was booted out of the AAU it too would remain a research university.
I don't think Oregon is excellent. There are pockets that are. It's an average state university. But like any school, it is mostly up to the student as to what they get out of it.
Solution: | No | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Output: Yes
The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input case for you: Are you not afraid of a bad guy with a gun because you know the idiot is not likely trained in how to use it ? That would make sense. The Idiot is not going to hit you from any distance greater then point blank.
As opposed to a trained gun owner that could take out a dog trying to attack his child.
BTW I'd much rather read a story about a dead dog then a 3 year old kid having it's face tore up by the some dog.
Output: | Yes | 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: BAM! Reading the comments below, I see there are a lot of pervert advocates in here, and not a one of them addressed Marcia's Billary point. Maybe it's time for Donald to change his name to Donna and watch the hate ooze from the pores of the thin skinned left.
Answer: Yes
Question: Wow. And human society has endured for how long since the first theaters opened?
I guess you could wear gloves, a germ mask, and sit far from others if you're that terrified of a theater.
Answer: No
Question: Back when your granddaddies went a lynching? That was democrats back then. never was republicans and still isn't.
Answer: | Yes
| 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Why? The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input: Ask the kids whose dad murdered thier mom while they slept in Fairbanks?
Solution: | No | 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Let me give you an example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
The answer to this example can be: Yes
Here is why: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
OK. solve this:
Read the article again. He wasn't staring him down, anymore, he had gotten out of his vehicle and was approaching the guy...who then shot him. Clearly self-defense.
Answer: | No | 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: Or move out of the LIO and into a building that the state already owns.
A: No
****
Q: One comment below you, "The primary system should replace the antiquated caucuses."
A: No
****
Q: Read the article again. He wasn't staring him down, anymore, he had gotten out of his vehicle and was approaching the guy...who then shot him. Clearly self-defense.
A: | No
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: We cant trust people who change ethical positions to stay in power. #whichjulesbailey #whichtedwheeler We would have wasted $10 Billion as estimated by Joe Cortright who is quoted as an expert on this. ODOT also used the endless lies used by Bailey. All the lies and roll vall listed here.. http://tinyurl.com/csatalking
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: Pete Kelly is a low life. He gives politicians a bad name.
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: BS - not "mostly" outsiders on the slope
Example Output: | No
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: Karl, even if they took the entire PFD, it is all spent already and they still have not closed the gap completely. they will implement a tax(s), at which point people will begin to evaluate the costs of living in Alaska to greener pastures in the South. I for one love Alaska, but if they steal to much of my income, I am not apposed to relocating elsewhere where my hard earned dollar will go farther. the state MUST cut and then cut some more before asking us to cut our standard of living. does it seem fair that they will require us to cut our budgets but do nothing meaningful with theirs?
Solution: | No | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Why? The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input: Boozer: tompaine2 makes a very good point here. Often the "rich and successful" believe they're really special.....some would use the phrase "Hot S@#$" . The MW's on-line dictionary reads.. "Simple Definition of hubris : a great or foolish amount of pride or confidence" You take two parts Anger, combine them with one part Hubris, and it often produces really "stupid" actions.
Solution: | Yes | 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example Input: YES !! Governor--YOU are on the right track !! BUT remember--THE PEOPLE keep saying !! NO touch the PF--THE legislative branch MUST follow suit--YES BUDGET cuts and broad based TAX-is the ONLY WAY to GO--NOT -NEW TAX--the fools dropped the state income TAX-during flush oil times--RE-INSTITUTE the STATE INCOME TAX---the BEST SOLUTION
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: Pete Kelly is a low life. He gives politicians a bad name.
Example Output: Yes
Example Input: It's not her practice to comment.... BUT......... she's going to comment..... "we do not anticipate charges". I wonder why Amy? I am sure money, ego and other tactics have a part to play. What a joke to call this law. And nice non-comment comment. Slimey layers, fraud lobbyists and sucker politicians. Yep, the white colony version of cannabis in Oregon sucks like the rest of the country thanks to people like this.
Example Output: | Yes
| 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: So what's with the "homosexual agenda"
remark? My parents were strictly anti-gay, but they had me. Everyone in my family and everyone I dealt with as a child was straight. I didn't fit the frggin mold! Uh-oh! My parents hate me! My Sunday school teacher hates me! I'm evil, a sinner, going to hell-oh no! Maybe if I pretend! (This is where a lot of gay youth turn to drug or suicide.) Lucky me, I met some people who were like me. I even fell in love. I want to marry that person, but it doesn't suit ---- you??? Because I won't have children? Thr human race won't perish if a few of us don't reproduce. The Bundys and Duggars of the world will see to that.
Answer: Yes
Question: Good shooting? 5 shots? Sounds like spraying lead and hoping it hits something to me -- far from what I'd call good shooting.
And as I've said before, if everybody shot every dog who came running at them barking the bodies would be piled high and friendly neighbors few and far between.
Answer: Yes
Question: Sounds like EverBank is trying to bully the state with its threats. They have probably been in cahoots with Pfeffer all along and this is their last ditch scare tactic.
Answer: | No
| 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Ex Input:
And if they take action BEFORE a criminal conviction they set themselves up for a lawsuit brought on by those that they have taken adverse action against while lacking "the training the skill the resources to do it in-house" to do a proper investigation. Such an approach is and will be a disaster for universities and colleges.
Ex Output:
No
Ex Input:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ijaO8XBwMg&feature=youtu.be&app=desktop
Ex Output:
No
Ex Input:
Are these producers receiving state money to create this junk that just makes Alaskans look like a bunch of idiots?
Ex Output:
| Yes
| 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Input: Consider Input: True enough. Alas, for many conservatives the world can only be black or white, and Mr. Trump is Dubya on steroids. Not only are you "against me" if you're not "for me," you're a loser and stupid and (choose your Trump invective here). Hyperbole should no longer be tempered: Mr. Trump is a "leader" in the same vein as Hitler and Mussolini. Consistently deprecating (and increasingly openly violent toward) to those who not only disagree with him, but are doing their jobs (or not) as journalists. Not simply a cartoonish narcissistic blowhard, but a rallying point for the ignorant, angry and uninformed. There will be violence, and worse, coming from the Trump camp, I fear. The Republican party created this monster in 50 years since Nixon (both their racist, misogynist, homophobic "core" and the individual now leading them), and when you sleep with dogs, you get fleas. They have no idea where to scratch, which is both gratifyingly hilarious and frightening.
Output: Yes
Input: Consider Input: Let the liberal-shaming process begin!
Output: Yes
Input: Consider Input: Those is charge now must then be representative of Criminal Defense Attorneys, because all they do now is lie about the outright crimes they're committing.
| Output: Yes
| 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Input: Consider Input: Karl, even if they took the entire PFD, it is all spent already and they still have not closed the gap completely. they will implement a tax(s), at which point people will begin to evaluate the costs of living in Alaska to greener pastures in the South. I for one love Alaska, but if they steal to much of my income, I am not apposed to relocating elsewhere where my hard earned dollar will go farther. the state MUST cut and then cut some more before asking us to cut our standard of living. does it seem fair that they will require us to cut our budgets but do nothing meaningful with theirs?
Output: No
Input: Consider Input: Your posts don't bother me, Donkel!
From the ridiculous, scary, baseless hyperbole to the UNNECESSARY CAPITALIZATION, I THINK you should KEEP ON DOING what you're DOING.
Output: Yes
Input: Consider Input: Where are the 1 in 7 addicts, that Kevin Sabet keeps pointing to? Please wake up, and use a search engine to enlighten yourself, instead of looking for more bad quotes. You have never been addicted to pot, and if you were, it must have been doctored with PCP or something. Not knowing what you're getting in that baggie, is a serious problem with black market drugs, as there is NO mandatory testing, to make sure you are getting what you pay for, not nasty chemicals you don't want. Tell me, what dangerous poisons are there in cannabis that can hurt you? This plant can only kill you, if a couple hundred pounds fall on your head.
| Output: No
| 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Why? The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input: One of the plaintiffs in this lawsuit is Jim Crawford, former head of the Republican party when the CBC held sway. If memory serves me, Mr Crawford got trounced in a primary race by a challenger he out spent 10-1. Maybe, if he had out spent his challenger 20-1, he would have gone to Juneau and continued the fine traditions of the CBC. Over 500 years ago, Machiavelli wrote, "All power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely." The oil coalition in Juneau has had close to absolute power with predictable results. In Juneau, money corrupts. Oil money corrupts absolutely. There is no lack of ethically challenged people from both parties. Make no mistake, this lawsuit is about controlling the political process with a big dash of sour grapes from Mr. Crawford.
Solution: | No | 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Q: Boozer: I'm guessing the Courts will eventually decide if this ban is a "traffic safety matter" or a blatant attempt to circumvent the Constitutional Protections provided by the First Amendment.
I've yet to read of a single incident of a traffic accident being caused by someone passing spare change to a panhandler. I've yet to read of a single incident of a panhandler being struck by a vehicle.
If you follow the "traffic safety" logic, Springfield should make it completely illegal for pedestrians to cross main street. Why don't you tally the number killed crossing that street and compare it to the number of panhandlers struck by vehicles.
The proposed ban is, indeed, that "end run" I suggest. I don't expect the City or any supporters of the ban to acknowledge this (although a few posters on this site have done so). I don't expect the Police Chief to acknowledge it. I don't expect the City Council to acknowledge it. I don't expect Springfield's attorneys to acknowledge it
A: No
****
Q: Arrogance run amok. And we, the sheeple, are so disallusioned that we continuously tolerate it without even batting an eye.
Hey, George, we're not constituants, we're subjects...make sure that new office has a pillory.
A: Yes
****
Q: They're stalling.
A: | No
****
| 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[Q]: Running out of money to waste?
[A]: No
[Q]: Or move out of the LIO and into a building that the state already owns.
[A]: No
[Q]: Communication with strangers always seems iffy and more of a gamble. Damn-he was a lucky guy! Surely phone technology must improve to show access to nearest help!!?
[A]: | Yes
| 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Output: Yes
The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input case for you: Fishermen are already taxed, the raw fish tax is by all means an income tax on the municipal level. Either way let's not forget that Alaskans pay the least per capita in state services than any other in the union. It's not fun but if we want the services we need to pay for them somehow.
Output: | No | 1 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Let me give you an example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
The answer to this example can be: Yes
Here is why: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
OK. solve this:
Stop the negativity *love *peace *happiness
Answer: | No | 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: I've been gone, when do think we last had a beautiful city?
A thousand free weed whackers circulating in Eugene would go a long way in most neighborhoods. So much of what I see is simple decay of older structures.
And I would add a lot of individual decisions on property care that goes with very lax standards. Would asking a person to cut down weeds be a violation of their freedom of choice?
Solution: | Yes | 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Garland supported the D.C. gun ban in 2007, thereby showing he opposes self-defense and opposes the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms. This exposed Garland as a left-wing loon activist unworthy of sitting in judgment on any court bench. I will support the GOP on saving tax payer funding on hearings blocking such left wing activist lunatics. No shame in this. Besides Harry Reid and the democrats Obstructionism set a model in place to follow.
Answer: Yes
Question: https://www.muni.org/Departments/Fire/Wildfire/Documents/ANCHORAGE_WILDFIRE_May_2004_Program_Report.pdf.
Here is a long winded study the city published. If you read this closely, you will see many notations in regards to the "Fuel" problem on the HillSide. It will also show how we are not truly prepared to address the situation. Yes, there has been some correction, but nothing compared to what needs to be done. It's not, if it happens, it's when will it happen? Until we take major steps to reduce the fuel up there, it's a future killing field. I no longer have the numbers at my finger tips, but there was another study which identified just how much total fuel was up there. It compared it to "Powder Kegs".
Answer: Yes
Question: I've been gone, when do think we last had a beautiful city?
A thousand free weed whackers circulating in Eugene would go a long way in most neighborhoods. So much of what I see is simple decay of older structures.
And I would add a lot of individual decisions on property care that goes with very lax standards. Would asking a person to cut down weeds be a violation of their freedom of choice?
Answer: | Yes
| 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example solution: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: Bunch of hype created by Nate Herz and ADN. Can't imagine anyone fearfull of such a failure as Mark Begich.
| Solution: Yes | 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Input: Consider Input: Hey...AK folks, almost same move the US government made on our Social Security funds...It is your money they are taking...What don't you understand
about they are (Taking) your $MONEY$....they are doing nothing to reduce the cost of Government...Read the (Purpose & Intent) of the Perm-Fund...Again it is (YOUR MONEY) IT IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE...YOU ARE
BEING ''SCREWED'' FOLKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Output: No
Input: Consider Input: How is it impractical (aka unfair) to expect communities to take responsibility for themselves? It sounds like some of these communities in question are, in and of themselves, impractical if they can't survive without handouts from the government. The obligation is theirs. It sounds pretty ridiculous to claim that "forcing the obligations" of their own existence upon them is somehow wrong.
Output: Yes
Input: Consider Input: People that have friends or family members that sexually abuse a child most often hate the offender's behavior but still manage to love the friend or family member offender. To each their own choice, Rhyner. Yeah, it's too bad Dalton chose to use the Internet to find a lover. But he did it with eyes wide open knowing full well the big fat lie that he was living amongst the stage cast that were his true friends. Dalton betrayed that trust. The cast must move on without Dalton.
| Output: Yes
| 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Part 2. Example
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Answer: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Part 3. Exercise
That's what makes Wasilla so special.
Answer: | No | 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Input: Consider Input: Good shooting? 5 shots? Sounds like spraying lead and hoping it hits something to me -- far from what I'd call good shooting.
And as I've said before, if everybody shot every dog who came running at them barking the bodies would be piled high and friendly neighbors few and far between.
Output: Yes
Input: Consider Input: That's actually an awesome idea. We'll call it the idiot tax.
Output: Yes
Input: Consider Input: Horrible argument. Fool.
| Output: Yes
| 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
Ok Dermot, we get it...you went home with the last girl in the bar and when you woke up in the morning it was Harriet Drummond, we get it.
answer:
No
question:
But the thing is...she couldn't have said anything else. If you are a musher and you say anything bad about the Iditarod, they can ban you. It's the new gag order on mushers, which I think is incredibly newsworthy. She couldn't say that she wasn't "satisfied with how the ITC was handling it," in fact she was specifically obligated to say that she WAS satisfied, because she's not allowed to say anything bad. Medred decided that this wasn't OK and went ahead with the story, a decision I think was right.
I guess he could have left her name out of it, but perhaps the info was already out there and telling the story with no name attached would have been weird.
answer:
No
question:
Would individuals be required to provide proof of income when they sign up for a library card in your proposed two tier fines system? Is this to become another public service where low income families would be forced to admit poverty and ask for help? Is this a real argument against taking down barriers that prevent kids from access to reading? The library's proposal is a progressive and great idea. If you're worried about kids learning responsibility look to the parents that can afford this high and mighty shit. Life lessons are not the responsibility of the libraries, their responsibility is to provide access to books to the community and they have found a great way to do a better job of this. Why construct a flawed argument against this move?
answer:
| Yes
| 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example is below.
Q: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
A: Yes
Rationale: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: With all the EMX construction, will anyone be able to get in and out of Wendy's in a timely matter?
A: | No | 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
According to Wikipedia, Ted Cruz is a Southern Baptist, not a Conservative Baptist.
No
There are enough natural earthquakes in the Cook Inlet area.........why are they inviting more with fracking?
No
I'm sure she will have a staffer write you a very generically written reply and send it to you on a fancy congressional letterhead.
After all, she is very busy trying to fix this very important issue.
LOL, yeah right. This is the republicans new ANWR, they will trot this out for every election cycle they can get out of it.
| Yes
| 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[EX Q]: The layoffs are minor, and mostly just not filling unbudgeted positions. they aren't real cuts like the 30-40% occurring in the oil business. Or the 100% when a rig gets laid down
[EX A]: No
[EX Q]: Trump sad person but what is even sadder is persons that support this train wreck.
[EX A]: Yes
[EX Q]: Translation: Trump may win the Republican nomination. There is even a small chance he will be the next President. He hates much of the present Republican establishment and would demolish it. He isn't totally on board as far as unthinking support of Israel. He is bringing on board the thoughts and needs of the very low income blue collar Republicans, people who are not regarding highly by the super rich. He supports those in border states.
Bush is out, Rubio is in charge.
Sure, what is said here in this article is rational and reasonable. Saying "Trump’s GOP is a rear-window party pining for a white America that never is coming back" pretty much tosses those blue collar workers under the bus.
I will be voting for Bernie, but even I recognize what is happening.
The billionaire vote is terrified of their own base, who could cost them both the Senate and the Presidency. So that base is now fair game. The support for Rubio is now mandatory.
Hugh Massengill, Eugene
[EX A]: | Yes
| 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: To continue... ppl who are upset about a homeless person living in a tent should try it for a year. Figure out how you are gonna eat, sleep safely, go to the bathroom without getting in trouble, stay warm, avoid trouble with the police (some cops really do just want to fuck with ppl,) deal with the rain, snow, cold, heat, all the weather in every form... among many other things. And the tell me how privileged you thing they are after. Remember... you don't ever really understand someone else's situation until you've walked in their shoes. Sometimes those shoes are full of rocks, the sock is slipping down, they are giving you blisters and there is a hole in the bottom eating your sock! Do not judge lest ye be judged!
A: | Yes | 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Part 1. Definition
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Part 2. Example
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Answer: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Part 3. Exercise
Start holding Legislators responsible for their behavior. Go to twitter and follow @jmlhsieh, retweet everytime a rule is broken and make sure to include @aklegislature
Answer: | No | 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
TASK DEFINITION: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
PROBLEM: "Additionally, the report found that forests in Southeast Alaska will capture more carbon going forward, though it is only a small region of the state."
Why? How?
"going forward?" Please, let's kill this nonsensical and completely redundant idiom now.
SOLUTION: Yes
PROBLEM: Clark has my vote. I've not been impressed with the direction that the Kitty Cabal has taken recently, eschewing sound management in favor of a progressive moonbat agenda that simultaneously fails to confront the city manager and his developer pals. Mike Clark will be a welcome change from the status quo. The city has lost my trust and will need strong, experienced leadership to win it back if they expect me to ever vote for another tax levy - period.
SOLUTION: No
PROBLEM: Feck off with your pretentious review of Gramma's Corner in Milwaukie as some quaint piece of "Americana". I'm a year late to this review, but geezus, local dinguses like you live in a vacuum. The food is good, cheap, and their gravy is something to behold.
SOLUTION: | Yes
| 8 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example solution: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: Yes, lets move into the old Carr's store a bit closer to your store.
| Solution: No | 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[EX Q]: My Uncle Henry got a 2013 Mercedes SLS AMG Convertible from only workin part-time on a home computer..........
www.worknow88.com
[EX A]: No
[EX Q]: Maybe take away some TV shows, such as one where you take a pill and suddenly you're the all-powerful wizard, or some video games that advocate to kill in any way possible. Even cartoons are violent. But hey, I'm glad to know kids are eating seaweed! My Grandkids love it.
[EX A]: No
[EX Q]: Huh. Rather sounds like the playbook of those promoting imposition of a carbon tax ... :-/
[EX A]: | No
| 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Detailed Instructions: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
See one example below:
Problem: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: This would be a great addition to downtown and allow for housing that isn't targeted towards students, but instead towards townies. Although the rent seems high, anywhere in the urban core is pretty high nowadays.
Solution: | No | 4 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: Ahh you're right. I had my bored activists mixed up. I had forgotten how important an arctic cat jacket is amongst the issues of the day.
Answer: Yes
Question: This driver, no doubt, was driving with a Class A CDL. CDL's manual required that drivers must look at least a quarter mile down the road and be aware of the environment and anticipate unexpected condition in the road or sides of the road. Unless the woman ran out in front of the truck, the drive should've slowed down and avoided hitting her.
Answer: No
Question: Something you may be missing, Elmore. If a dog charges, people react differently depending on circumstances like whether they are accompanied by defenseless children, who can be eviscerated in an instant. Any parent who would trust their child's welfare to the goodwill of an agitated animal is not a fit parent. Interjecting yourself into the scenario, and claiming you would slam the door, or kick the dog is nothing more than Monday-morning quarterbacking, since you did not witness the circumstances. There are a lot of hysterical commenters here who would rather see you face down a grizzly bear empty-handed, then blame you for smelling like food, or not following their bear-wise precautions. I'm talking about the backwards-thinking people who commend killing the unborn, then over-compensate through fanatical defense of animals: a cowardly position which costs them nothing, and still lets them feel like Gandhi.
Answer: | Yes
| 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Why? The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
New input: Howdy Boozer. I see you are earning your troll dollar again today. You're off your game though, just screaming they are all liars may appeal to some of your cheer squad, but to most thinking people it shows the last desperate efforts at denial. A guy has to wonder what kind of special soul defends indiscriminate broadcasting of toxins into the wind then calls them liars when people become ill?
Solution: | Yes | 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
--------
Question: If you can't tell from the name, it's a troll account. Hopefully it will be banned quickly. These kind of people are the scum of the earth!
Answer: Yes
Question: What? The PFD is income. Unearned income, granted, but still income. So let's do some math. Family A. 4 people. 30k earned income, 6k (modest average) PFD unearned income. Taxing the PFD, and that is what it is. (Webster defines taxes as a compulsory contribution to state revenue) 2k or a 5.5% income tax. Family B. 4 people. 100k earned income, 6k pfd. Same 2k pfd tax 1.8% income tax. The pfd TAX targets those that have the least. "Whatever you do unto the least of these, you do unto me."
Answer: No
Question: and the feverish hand-wringing continues. as if it's gonna change how peeople here have been growing, eating smoking, and transporting their pot for the flast 40 years WITHOUT ANY HELP from the state. In fact, in many case's the state's own stupidity has only aided the "criminals" we would have a tome filled with legends of yore, heralding our own successes against these bumbling sheriff of knottingham types.
Answer: | Yes
| 7 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example input: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example output: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Q: "Facts" can totally be racist. They can leave out important information, they can be gathered in questionable ways, they can be presented in a biased manner. To pretend like there is some impeachable "truth" and that somehow, magically, that truth helps you maintain your place of privilege is dangerous, but it's what the dominant group has always done to help them stay in power. You can call me a "social justice warrior" and a "progressive leftist" if that makes you feel better, but it doesn't make you any more right or any less bigoted.
A: | Yes | 3 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Example solution: Yes
Example explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Problem: outsider77: "DG - I rarely venture an opinion on whether a claim of sexual abuse is valid or not." baloney. ** outsider77: "If we presume that female and male are equal in all respects... " actually, they're not, in any way, and in this instance the female was very young - she was a freshman - a student . he is close to 3X her age, soon to be her instructor? on what planet do you see equality there? **outsider77: "If you think the female should always be believed, say so and defend your position in a world where humans should be treated equally." I have said in many posts, most likely somewhere in every story of this nature, it is always a possibility the victim is lying. I know there are ugly motives for doing this to someone...BUT, I read every story...what is said, how, by who and what motive might they have had to say it. what she says, how she acted rings more true than the rush into the police station..omg - I've been raped! that is the one for sure I will be skeptical of
| Solution: Yes | 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Teacher: Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Teacher: Now, understand the problem? If you are still confused, see the following example:
This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution: Yes
Reason: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this instance: They want blood. Don't give it to them!
Student: | Yes | 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
[Q]: Clark has my vote. I've not been impressed with the direction that the Kitty Cabal has taken recently, eschewing sound management in favor of a progressive moonbat agenda that simultaneously fails to confront the city manager and his developer pals. Mike Clark will be a welcome change from the status quo. The city has lost my trust and will need strong, experienced leadership to win it back if they expect me to ever vote for another tax levy - period.
[A]: No
[Q]: Well, not exactly. The tax is meant to offset public health costs. The tax revenue rises and falls with the degree of consumption. If the tax reduces consumption, it's been successful, and the public health costs are decreased.
[A]: No
[Q]: I advocated his actual suicide, motleycrew. If someone were to assassinate him his groupies would start a religion to deify him. His suicide would be much more poetic.
[A]: | Yes
| 5 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
instruction:
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
question:
ahh. see, your being obtuse. you're obtuse a lot.
answer:
Yes
question:
Thanks, Les Jordan. This map of US military bases surrounding Iran supports your hunch that Israel’s paranoia may be a little bit hysterically overblown, comparatively. http://www.juancole.com/images/2012/02/bases3.png
answer:
Yes
question:
Former HGEA Executive Director, Russell Okata used the same phrase; it could be him.
The new HGEA leader does not care about others opinions.
answer:
| No
| 9 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
One example: This is what I read when it comes from an EWEB commish, 'Shut up and take it!'
Solution is here: Yes
Explanation: The comment has term 'commish' which is an insult, also the phrase 'shut up and take it' is insulting as well. The comment is classified to be insulting. Hence, it is a positive example
Now, solve this: What gifts of voice and narrative and oh what heart! I'll teach Geek Love till I yeah no more.
Gratitude, Dreamlet. 😈
Solution: | No | 6 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Input: Consider Input: This would be a great addition to downtown and allow for housing that isn't targeted towards students, but instead towards townies. Although the rent seems high, anywhere in the urban core is pretty high nowadays.
Output: No
Input: Consider Input: X, it's the choice of the individual and not yours .
The only effect on your life is what you chose to make it.
Output: No
Input: Consider Input: Xavier: It's interesting that some folks (including, it seems, you) are blaming Mr. Clark's loss on his running a lackluster campaign. From all I saw and read, he campaigned quite hard. I saw about 10 to 1 more Clark signs and only Clark billboards. I think he also worked to present himself as a rightg-of-center candidate. There's also the possibility that Ms. Vinis, campaigning as a progressive who would follow the same general philosophy as Mayor Piercy, was simply more to the liking of the voters.
| Output: Yes
| 2 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
Categorize the comment on the basis of insult. If the comment is insulting output Yes, otherwise output No.
Trump is going to change all that and give vets and their families everything they deserve . These hero's have been short changed far too long .
No
Depends on who and where you are.....
No
Actual reality politics in this country aside (i.e "It's never going to happen"), the Parliamentary systems of Britain, Israel, Japan, Germany etc. where multiple political parties exist and can have an actual 'piece of the action' to the extent of sometimes getting to be in charge of a portion of the actual Governmental Administration or at least real input on some pending legislation or governmental policies is at least superficially attractive.
The ability to hang up everything to get your own way by one or more minorities is both the strength and the weakness of those systems, however.
Just as the 2/3 Senate super-majority requirement for some things is for our system.
| No
| 0 | NIv2 | task1724_civil_comments_insult_classification | fs_opt |
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 66