text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
Southwestern University.
"Neil Mann" <[email protected]> on 02/27/2001 12:26:58 PM
Please respond to <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE:
What is SU? What can I do from this end so you can print it?
I set it as my wallpaper also. Wow!!
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 11:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re:
I set it as my new wallpaper. The file was too big - SU wouldn't let it
come in.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
deal has been changed
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/07/2001 11:07 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: apb checkout
the deal that sean entered (516073), the term is incorrect. the broker has
the 8th.
thanks
Kate Symes @ ECT 02/07/2001 10:39 AM
To: Kerri Thompson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: apb checkout
Checked with EES - Bob Badeer's deals are off peak. They've been changed.
515040 - changed last night to 275
Sean Crandall is entering the last deal right now. I'll let you know the deal
number in a minute.
Thanks,
Kate
Kerri Thompson@ENRON
02/07/2001 07:27 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: apb checkout
do you know the status on the trades? apb is calling.
Thanks
Kerri Thompson
02/06/2001 04:20 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: apb checkout
514918
514919
514920
514921
broker has all these deals as off peak
515040 broker has 275.00
missing deal for dianna
buy pudget
475.00
25 mw
8th
mid c
on peak
thanks
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Diane,
I will have it for you shortly.
Vince
-----Original Message-----
From: Fellers, Diane R.
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:02 AM
To: Kaminski, Vince J; Thode, Eric; O'rourke, Tim; Alvarez, Irma; Knudsen, Sheila A.; Skinner, Cindy; Walton, Sheila; Davies, Neil
Subject: 2002 Plan Headcout
Importance: High
Cost Center Managers:
I must turn in preliminary headcount numbers for the 2002 plan no later than tomorrow. Could each of you please return your plan headcount spreadsheets or let me know your expected headcount for 2002? Please keep in mind that these numbers can be adjusted later as necessary.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Thanks,
Diane
X5-7996
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Way down below is an attachment that shows a revised schedule for the AS work
that will cause us to shut in Calpine Clear Lake.
Thanks
Lee
---------------------- Forwarded by Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001
08:41 AM ---------------------------
Kenneth W Kaase on 03/14/2001 08:43:32 AM
To: Lee L Papayoti/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Channel A/S Line
Revised A/S Line Schedule Phase 2
---------------------- Forwarded by Kenneth W Kaase/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001
08:35 AM ---------------------------
James McKay
03/14/2001 07:59 AM
To: Kenneth W Kaase/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Channel A/S Line
---------------------- Forwarded by James McKay/HOU/ECT on 03/14/2001 07:58
AM ---------------------------
"Weir, Gordon R." <[email protected]> on 03/13/2001 03:39:56 PM
To: "Cole, Robert" <[email protected]>, "Choate, Dan"
<[email protected]>, "Logan, Jimmy" <[email protected]>, "Carter,
John" <[email protected]>, "Bradley, Stephen"
<[email protected]>, "Davis, Pat" <[email protected]>, "Earl
Tisdale (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "James McKay (E-mail)"
<[email protected]>, "Gary Hanks (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc: "Zimmer, Harry I." <[email protected]>, "Coffey, Ryan K."
<[email protected]>, "Veloz, Corina R." <[email protected]>
Subject: Channel A/S Line
Here is the first shot at a time table for Phase II from MLV 812 to Lomax.
The same time table from Phase I was used. 2 days between the phases was
allowed & 1 day for a pipeline repair. This time table seems to be early
but we need to notify our customers of the dates of this maintenance as soon
as possible. They need to find alternate sources of gas or plan maintenance
around these dates. Please review & notify me of any discrepancies that you
find.
Gordon
505-599-2118
<<PhaseII-812toLomax.rtf>>
******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the
El Paso Corporation are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error
please notify the sender.
******************************************************************
- PhaseII-812toLomax.rtf
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I have attached the proposed amendment to the Agency Agreement for your review.
Sara, subject to comments, I would appreciate it if you could also coordinate signatures.
Note that I will be out of the office until 13 August. Please contact Janine if you have any questions/comments.
Kind regards,
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Glover, Sheila
Sent: 27 July 2001 11:24
To: Juggins, Janine; Shackleton, Sara
Cc: Jacobson, Stephen
Subject: EISL Agency Agreement, Amendment Proposal
Janine and Sara,
The attached memo supports the proprosal to amend the Agency Agreement to July 1st, 2001 for compensation purposes.
Please advise.
Sheila
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Sorry
I didn't realize it was Good Friday. I took the day off. Let's hook up in the next couple of weeks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Suarez, John
Sent: Fri 4/13/2001 11:38 AM
To: Lavorato, John
Cc:
Subject: Squash
John,
If you are still interested in playing today, let me know what time so that I can reserve a court.
John D. Suarez
Enron Broadband Services
Phone: (713) 853-5267
Mobile: (713) 443-5267
< <mailto:[email protected]>>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Brother Strobel,
I'm sorry you feel that way. I'm sending the announcement out to everyone on the list.
Hopefully you will decide to opt back in. Remember, you can always go to the Yahoo site to read the history.
Perge'
Bob Boccaccio
BP '81
"Not for College Days Alone"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BPFIJI
http://www.boccaccioproductions.com/
----------
From: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 16:41:10 EST
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FW: Chapter Days and Nights
Hi: I'm sorry, but I can't find the time to read the e-mails. Please take me off the list.
Thanks,
Don Strobel
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
You have been subscribed to enl-dailyupdate-txt with the email address
"[email protected]"
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI, Burlington is still on the trading floor for VP signature. I just
called and should get same this PM.
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
whaddya mean, you think so?
Nancy Sellers <[email protected]>
05/09/2001 11:04 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Can you be home
i think so
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:58 PM
To: Nancy Sellers
Subject: RE: Can you be home
I'm serious. Are you referring to the proposal that no one knows about
that everyone knows about? We going to celebrate?
Nancy Sellers
<Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo To:
"'[email protected]'"
ndavi.com> <[email protected]>
cc:
05/08/2001 06:27 PM Subject: RE: Can you
be home
har har - don't tell though - I want it to be a surprise
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:22 PM
> To: Nancy Sellers
> Cc: 'Jeff Dasovich'; Prentice Sellers; Prentice @ Berkeley
> Subject: Re: Can you be home
>
>
> What's Sunday? Would that be "frog gras?"
>
>
>
>
> Nancy Sellers
>
> <Nancy.Sellers@RobertMo To: "'Jeff
> Dasovich'"
> ndavi.com>
> <[email protected]>, "Prentice @ Berkeley"
>
> <[email protected]>, Prentice Sellers
> 05/08/2001 04:29 PM <[email protected]>
>
> cc:
>
> Subject: Can you
be
> home
>
>
>
>
>
> for Sunday's dinner? I think I will order some foie for myself!
>
> Nancy
> (707) 251-4870 (phone)
> (707) 265-5446 (fax)
> "Plus je bois, mieux je chante"
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Stephanie, we have a Forecast Services Agreement between ENA and WSI ready
for signature. WSI has already signed. I am forwarding the copies to you --
can you get the two copies signed tomorrow and returned to WSI? Thanx.
Sara, Do you think we need to note this account in lotus notes? Let me know.
Cheryl Nelson
Senior Counsel
EB3875
(713) 345-4693
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
JM,
Is the contract for this deal still valid? I want to roll the deal for Sep
and Oct.
D
---------------------- Forwarded by Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000
02:29 PM ---------------------------
Mark McCoy@ENRON
10/17/2000 01:34 PM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: meter 5892 South Katy Gas Unit 2- Allocation
Daren---
I need some help with meter 5892 for September 00 due to a feedback error.
Deal 133196 (purchase from Duke on gathering contract) is erroring out due to
it's expiration date of 8/31/00......however it still showed up in POPS (w/o
a nom) on 9/1. Volume management allocated volume to it according to the
allocation statement. Should this deal be extended? I noticed it is not out
there for October either. I have the feedback error sheet & allocation if
you want to see them.
Let me know,
Mark
x33396
p.s. Fred Boas said you used to handle this and you were very wise in the art
of allocation......so I am expecting big results Grasshopper!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
> Hi John,
>
> I will be in London sometime next week and was hoping to look at the knox
> cup, or experience the miracle of your finding the little dresser 3 legged
> conical bowl I want. In any event, I'd like to have the option of getting
> the 7800 pounds back if nothing materializes. As you know, Enron is
> undergoing very hard times, and I have a lot of loose ends that I'd like to
> manage. I'm off for the Thanksgiving holiday for the next few days, and
> hope you have a great weekend.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jeff
>
Hi Jeff,
Let me know when you are coming to London, so that I can be sure to be here
to show you the Knox cup and the new book by Steve Martin.
Since September 11, business has really dried up, mostly because my main
outlet is to Americans who are not travelling much at the moment. So I
propose to send you a cheque for ?2800 within the next few days, or give it
to you when you come here, followed by a cheque for ?2500 in December and
one for ?2500 in January. Total ?7800. The last thing I was expecting
was you calling in your credit, and like all dealers I'm always trying to
keep my balance on the tightrope. Let me know what you think.
In the meantime I have heard about the troubles at Enron, and I hope all
goes well for you.
--
Regards
John
Email: [email protected]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: john jesse <[email protected]>@ENRON
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:44 AM
> To: Shankman, Jeffrey A.
> Subject: Re: Re Venini
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Hope your weekend was good. I have not heard back from you regarding
> the
>> knox piece, and was curious about it. Also, you know I'm still
> interested
>> in a dresser coniod bowl with the three bent legs.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: john jesse <[email protected]>@ENRON
>> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 10:11 AM
>> To: Shankman, Jeffrey A.
>> Subject: Re Venini
>>
>> Hi Jeff
>> The world certainly has changed, and everything seems so down at the
>> moment. I tried returning your call earlier but you were in a
> meeting.
>> So maybe when you are free, give me a call on 207 229 4790, I should
> be
>> there from 6pm English time.
>> Meanwhile have a look at these two attachments. A silver Knox cup
> and a
>> Christopher Dresser vase . . . .just recently acquired
>> The Venini vase is a very generous gift. . They are lucky to have
> you!
>> Speak to you later
>> --
>> Regards
>> John
>> Email: [email protected]
>>
>> - Knox Cup.JPG << File: Knox Cup.JPG >>
>> - DresserAult.JPG << File: DresserAult.JPG >>
>>
>>
>>
>> **********************************************************************
>> This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant
> affiliate and
>> may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> the
>> intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
> others
>> is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> authorized
>> to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply to
> Enron
>> Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
> copies of the
>> message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not intended to
> be an
>> offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a binding and
>> enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its affiliates)
> and the
>> intended recipient or any other party, and may not be relied on by
> anyone as
>> the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise. Thank you.
>> **********************************************************************
>
>
>
> Just after your email someone came to my shop and expressed
> interest in
> the Knox Cup. . .so I didn't reply until interest waned. This Knox cup
> is a
> variant of the cup that is on the cover of Steve Martin's book. Steve
> has
> now brought out a new book on Knox and this cup is illustrated in it.
> You
> might be able to get the book from Amazon.com. Full title is:
> Archibald
> Knox by Stephen A Martin. Artmedia Press.
> --
>
> Regards
> John
> Email: [email protected]
>
>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Stan:
Attached is a redraft of the organization announcement, incorporating
mention of Bob Hall's departure and including Danny McCarty's rewrite of the
second paragraph.
I also am including a draft of an announcement to Omaha and Houston
employees regarding the meetings you have scheduled on the 17th and 18th,
respectively. We would propose to send it out, via e-mail, Thursday
afternoon for deliver Friday morning. I'd like your approval of the wording
of the annoucement as well as the timing associated with sending ti.
Finally, fyi, I've included what I propose to send out Friday, via e-mail,
to all vice presidents of GPG companies and divisions, inviting them to your
staff meeting Monday morning.
d.s.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Colleen, thank you so much for your very prompt attention to this. I
definitely had the wrong version of the agreement.
Jeff confirmed by voice mail this morning that even though we already
included the 5.4 language in the draft we sent him back in March, he does
find it objectionable and will want to modify it, so he will be very
interested in seeing your suggested language too.
Please send your attachment "CalpineO&M 10-18-00 edits to draft03-20-00".
Again, thank you so much for your help with this. (Calpine has finally woken
up and realized they want this in place Nov. 1...)
I will let you know how negotiations are shaping up.
Colleen Raker
10/18/2000 07:35 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Draft- Operating Agreement
Attached below is Jeff Fawsett's 3/22/00 note to Calpine with TW's 3/20/00
draft of the Operating Agreement . What changes if any did Calpine require
to this draft? Please note that Section 5.4 of the attached 3/20/00 draft is
substantively identical to my further-revised Section 5.4 (with subsections A
and B) that I forwarded to you a few days after Jeff's note to Calpine.
From our meeting this morning I understand that Jeff appears adverse to
Transwestern's claiming zero financial responsibility for damages to
Calpine's Measurement and Control Facilities that result from TW's O&M
Services. Consequently, I made some modifications to Articles 4 and 5 of the
3/20/00 draft for TW management's consideration. These changes are noted in
the attached document marked "CalpineO&M 10-18-00 edits to draft03-20-00".
With my 10-18-00 revisions, TW places a limit on its liability to Calpine for
loss or damage incurred by Calpine due to TW's Services, including loss or
damage to the existing M&C Facilities, if and to the extent damage is caused
by TW's negligent acts or omissions. To complete my modification to Section
5.3, TW is to insert the maximum aggregate amount of financial liability it
is willing to assume in any contract year. This amount could be the amount
of Calpine's deductible on its property insurance coverage or a lesser
amount. Whatever the amount chosen, please remember that TW is self-insured
for the first $2M, each occurrence. Therefore, what is the amount of risk
that TW is willing to pay out of its earnings if Calpine claims damage to its
existing Facility due to TW's negligent operations? That is the amount to
insert in the blank space in Section 5.3.
FYI, the changes in Sections 3.1 and 4.1 (b) and (c), and the striking of
Section 4.1 (d) do not create any substantive changes to the 3/20/00 draft.
I made the latter changes for stylistic reasons and to correct typos and
redundancies. Please call me if you have any questions and to let me know
the status of this document. I have lost track of my notes on the status of
TW Operations' review and approval of the list of Services included in
Exhibit B; this needs to be determined by Jeff (or his designee) before the
final definitive agreement is prepared for signing.
---------------------- Forwarded by Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron on 10/18/2000
06:34 PM ---------------------------
Jeffery Fawcett
03/22/2000 12:26 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: (bcc: Colleen Raker/ET&S/Enron)
Subject: Draft- Operating Agreement
Chad,
Sorry it took so long to get back with you, but we've had some folks out
(including me) on Spring Break with their kids. Attached is a draft of the
Operating Agreement covering TW's operation of the metering station. It's
pretty much a standard form agreement for TW, with the possible exception of
the exhibit defining the operating parameters of the South Point plant. As I
mentioned to you in our meeting in Pleasanton, the operating parameters
exhibit is a useful tool for both companies to assist in identifing some of
the operating conditions the plant might encounter and the ability of TW to
load follow those conditions. I made a number of assumptions regarding the
burn rates for your facilities, especially the base rate and minimum rates.
You'll likely have to fine tune those numbers. Also, I've yet to ask our
engineers to secure the documentation necessary to complete Exhibit "A" from
your 3rd party engineers. We'll include it in the final version. Please
give me a call after you and your team has had a chance to review. Thanks.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Thanks! You guys are adorable. When I become technologically advanced enough
to get a picture of myself onto the computer, I promise to send it over. In
the meatime, just picture me as a Cindy Crawford type, only thinner. :-)
And on the subject of the BPA deal - I just spoke with Val Sabo, who's
working with Greg Wolfe and Tim Belden to get this deal done. Apparently it's
a good deal; it was put into the system and calculated, then taken out and is
currently being re-negotiated. When Greg and Tim come to an agreement with
BPA, they will most likely send you a revised confirmation. So in the
meantime, Val says to hold off doing anything. We'll keep you posted.
Thanks for checking up on this.
Kate
From: Kimberly Allen 01/05/2001 08:28 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Hey
Just thought it would be a nice idea if you knew who you were talking to in
the Houston office.
Left to right: Kimberly Hundl, Stephanie Piwetz, Kimberly Indelicato, not an
EPMI employee & Amy Heffernan
Have a great day!
KI
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hi,
Previously I forwarded an email to you which contain a list of options products we are considering making markets in.
Many of you have asked for more details on these (exotic) options products.
In response to this request, I will be periodically forward modules to your attention which give further details on these options products.
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions, comments, etc.
Regards,
Iris
Power Options Trading Desk
x3-6711
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Fyi -More articles on the Senate Pipeline Safety Hearing held in Bellingham
Washington
---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Terraso/OTS/Enron on 03/14/2000
07:30 AM ---------------------------
"Terry D. Boss" <[email protected]> on 03/14/2000 10:01:29 AM
To: "Dave Johnson (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Mike Terraso
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Articles on Yesterday's hearings from Seattle Papers
State wins OK to inspect pipelines
by Brier Dudley
Seattle Times staff reporter
[IMAGE]
BELLINGHAM - Federal regulators yesterday agreed to allow Washington state
to inspect all interstate pipelines within its borders, as requested by Gov.
Gary Locke and the state Legislature.
"We've got it - we've just got to work out the fine details," Locke said.
State officials think they'll do a better job inspecting the 2,500 miles of
pipelines in the state than the federal Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), an
agency that's been harshly criticized since Olympic Pipe Line's June 10
explosion in Bellingham that killed three people.
Other states have tried unsuccessfully to take control of pipeline
inspections from the OPS, which has only 13 inspectors for the West Coast,
but only four states now have that authority.
Still unresolved, however, is whether the state will be allowed to impose
safety standards stricter than federal standards.
The state's authority could also be short-lived if the OPS and the oil
industry persuade Congress later this year to reduce states' role in
pipeline oversight.
Mixed messages about the safety office's position were delivered yesterday
at a special Senate field hearing on pipeline-safety concerns.
Locke announced that the state was given testing authority, based on a faxed
letter he received just hours earlier from the top administrator for
pipeline safety.
The fax said the state could take over inspections on condition that only
one state agency were responsible. A state law approved last week would have
divided the task between two.
But later in the hearing, OPS' deputy administrator, Richard Felder,
acknowledged under questioning that he would prefer that inspection
authority remain with his office.
To sidestep that debate, U.S. Sen. Slade Gorton, R-Wash., proposed amending
the federal law that gives the OPS authority over pipelines that cross state
lines.
Because Olympic Pipe Line is almost entirely in Washington - its 400-mile
system parallels Interstate 5 and ends in Portland - Gorton suggested that
states be allowed to regulate pipelines that are over 90 percent within
their borders.
Olympic, a Renton-based subsidiary of Shell, Texaco, Arco and oil shipper
GATX, testified that it would prefer federal oversight.
"Having a unified set of regulations is important for a smooth operation,"
said manager Carl Gast.
Gorton and U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., hosts of the hearing, both want
the state to have more authority over interstate pipelines.
They're backing legislation that would give states authority and funding to
inspect pipelines themselves and require better collection and sharing of
data about pipelines' condition.
They also want the stricter standards on pipeline testing, monitoring and
operations.
Murray, whose twin sister teaches at a Bellingham school near the explosion
site, noted that pipelines have spilled 5,700 times and killed 325 people in
the U.S. since 1986. She also said they leak 6 million gallons of hazardous
material a year, or the equivalent of the Exxon Valdez spill every two
years.
During the hearing at Bellingham City Hall, the senators also heard
emotional pleas for stricter regulations from victims' parents. Two
10-year-old boys and an 18-year-old fisherman died after Olympic spilled
277,000 gallons of gasoline into a city park.
"There needs to be a zero-spill policy, not `we only kill two or three kids
a year,' " said Frank King, whose 10-year-old, Wade, died in the explosion.
Katherine Dalen, mother of 10-year-old victim Stephen Tsorvias, said the
accident made people realize their neighborhoods may not be safe because of
the poorly regulated underground pipelines. Also testifying were city
officials from Renton, SeaTac and Bellevue. Like Bellingham, those cities
are trying to get Olympic to provide more information and testing to assure
residents that the pipeline is safe.
Olympic's Gast noted that the company will use two devices to internally
inspect its entire pipeline later this year.
The cause of the accident is still being investigated by the National
Transportation Safety Board, which has been hampered by Olympic employees'
refusal to testify and by a federal criminal investigation into the
accident.
Copyright , 2000 The Seattle Times Company
Pipeline blast still evokes anger
Grieving parents urge senators to pass tough safety bill
Tuesday, March 14, 2000
By SCOTT SUNDE Mail Author
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER
BELLINGHAM -- Nine months have passed since Bruce Brabec's stepson died in a
horrific pipeline accident here. But the memories haven't faded.
Photo ?
Mary King weeps as her husband, Frank, testifies yesterday at a Senate field
hearing in Bellingham on pipeline safety. Their son, Wade, died in the June
pipeline explosion.
Dan DeLong/P-I ?
The smell of gasoline when Brabec fills the family car reminds him of the
fumes that killed Liam Wood, who was 18 and out for a day of flyfishing on
June 10.
The sound of the newspaper hitting the front porch every morning reminds
Brabec of when police arrived to tell him and his wife that Liam had been
overcome by fumes from leaking gasoline and drowned.
"Imagine going home tonight, and your child isn't home -- and never will
be," Brabec told U.S. Sens. Slade Gorton and Patty Murray during a Senate
field hearing on pipeline safety yesterday.
?
Getting involved
The public may mail written comments on improving pipeline safety to the
Senate Commerce Committee, 508 Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington,
D.C. 20510.
Anger and anguish mixed freely at the hearing, which Gorton, a Republican,
hopes will bolster efforts to win approval for a tough pipeline safety bill
introduced by Democrat Murray.
The hearing in Bellingham's Depression-era City Hall attracted an overflow
crowd. Townsfolk were forced to huddle around television sets and watch the
proceedings in the lobby. Their frequent applause at the angry words drifted
up the stairs and into the crowded hearing room.
State and local officials blasted the federal Office of Pipeline Safety as
ineffective. It regulates interstate pipelines such as the one owned by
Olympic Pipe Line Co. that ruptured and caught fire in Bellingham last
June.
There was anger, too, at Olympic. Officials from cities through which the
pipeline runs said the company had resisted supplying them with data from
pipe inspections, then agreed by providing "X's and O's" that no one could
understand.
"We have no confidence," said Connie Marshall, Bellevue's deputy mayor,
"that the Olympic pipeline is safely maintained and operated within our
city."
The company, however, pledged a safer pipeline, pointing to a plan
instituted in October to add valves, test pressure, strengthen computer
processing and make sophisticated internal inspections. The company is
trying to improve any system that may have been at fault in the June 10
accident, said Carl Gast, Olympic vice president and manager.
"We are not waiting until after the investigation (by the National
Transportation Safety Board) is complete to take action," Gast said.
Gast, who has worked in the pipeline industry for 31 years, called the
company's safety plan "the most far-reaching with which I've ever been
involved."
Olympic runs a 400-mile system that takes petroleum products from refineries
north of Bellingham and at Anacortes to Portland. The system runs near the
Interstate 5 corridor, including through the suburbs east of Lake
Washington.
The victims:
Wade King: The 10-year-old burned to death while playing in Whatcom Creek
when it erupted in a fireball June 10.
Stephen Tsorvias: Also, 10, he was playing with Wade when gasoline ignited
after spilling from a ruptured Olympic Pipe Line fuel line.
Liam Wood: The 18-year-old was flyfishing on the creek when he was overcome
by leaking gasoline fumes and drowned.
The anguish at the hearing came from the parents of Wood and parents of two
10-year-old boys -- Wade King and Stephen Tsorvias -- who burned to death as
277,000 gallons of spilled gasoline ignited and a fireball roared down
Whatcom Creek.
At times, "sadness tears our hearts apart and drowns our spirits," said
Katherine Dalen, Stephen's mother.
Marlene Robinson, Liam's mother, said softly: "I no longer have children to
protect."
They, too, were angry at Olympic and at the Office of Pipeline Safety.
The boys' families have filed wrongful-death lawsuits against Olympic. Frank
King, Wade's father, made it clear yesterday whom he blames for the tragedy.
"The company is an outrage. It needs to be shut down," King said. "Olympic's
gross, wanton recklessness killed my little man."
King said he has evidence that Olympic had a chance in July 1997 to dig up
the pipe where it would later rupture to check for possible problems, but
decided not to because the excavation would be too difficult. Bellingham has
a water plant near the site of the rupture and numerous water pipes are
above the pipeline.
In an interview, King produced an Olympic document gathered for his lawsuit
that he said indicated that the company decided not to dig up the pipe. In
1996 and 1997, Olympic did an internal inspection of its pipeline.
Possible defects were identified in the inspections near where the pipe
would later rupture. But Olympic has said the possible defects did not seem
serious enough to dig up the pipeline near the water plant.
Olympic Pipe Line spokeswoman Maggie Brown said King's testimony marked the
first time she had ever heard the claim that the company was prepared to dig
up that section of pipe in 1997 but decided not to.
King's wife, Mary, erupted in frustration that the accident was allowed to
happen.
"If this is properly maintained, regulated, whatever, it won't happen
again," she said tearfully. "Anything is going to be better than what went
on in the past, which was nothing."
In fact, pipeline regulation may be changing.
The Washington Legislature passed a bill this year that sets up a state
pipeline safety program and asks the federal government for the power to
police interstate lines like Olympic's.
Gov. Gary Locke told Gorton and Murray yesterday that the federal government
may be willing to give the state the authority to inspect interstate
pipelines. Four states currently have that authority, but the federal
government still retains the right to punish pipeline companies over
problems found in inspections.
A top official of the U.S. Transportation Department told Locke in a letter
yesterday that the federal government may give Washington inspection
authority.
Locke, however, also wants the state to have the authority to regulate
pipelines and to use tougher standards than the federal rules to do so.
Murray's bill would give the states more authority.
Richard Felder, head of the Office of Pipeline Safety, admitted that his
regulators have had problems. "We worked to restore public confidence,"
Felder said, "but clearly we have a long way to go."
Felder said the office's proposed budget would provide it with more money
for regulation. He also said his office will propose a new regulation by the
end of the month to require companies to test the safety of their
pipelines.
Gorton and Murray, however, seemed unconvinced that federal regulators will
get tough. So was Bob Chipkovitch, who runs the pipeline program at the
National Transportation Safety Board. The NTSB, which has no regulatory
authority, has repeatedly recommended tougher rules, only to see nothing
happen in the Office of Pipeline Safety, he said.
For example, 12 years after the NTSB recommended that regulators require
periodic inspections, no such rule has been adopted.
"I hope Bellingham has made a difference," Chipkovitch said. "No, we haven't
seen a change yet (by regulators). But I hope this accident does provide the
impetus to do that."
The NTSB has yet to determine the cause of the June 10 accident. But
Chipkovitch said the investigation so far has shown "significant performance
failures" by pipeline controllers.
He noted that the pipeline rupture began at 3:30 p.m. June 10 after a pump
failure near Woodinville, computer problems at the company's Renton
headquarters and a valve closed near Anacortes. But 45 minutes later,
refineries north of Bellingham resumed putting gasoline in the line.
Controllers only started shutting down the pipeline for good at 4:30.
At the point where the pipeline ruptured, there may be evidence of external
damage, Chipkovitch said. Olympic contends that construction at the water
plant in 1994 damaged the pipe.
But investigators have yet to fully test the damaged pipe. A federal
criminal investigation into the accident has kept them from doing so. At the
same time, several Olympic officials have refused to talk to the NTSB,
fearing they would incriminate themselves.
Chipkovitch said the investigation also focuses on the valve near Anacortes
that closed June 10, increasing pressure in the pipe upstream. The valve
closed 50 times in the six months before the Bellingham accident, he said.
Pipeline accidents
Some of the country's largest pipeline accidents in recent years:
June 10, 1999: The Olympic Pipe Line Co.'s pipeline in Bellingham ruptured
and 277,000 gallons of jet fuel spilled into Whatcom Creek, then ignited
(above), killing two 10-year-old boys and an 18-year-old fisherman. It was
the 43rd reported spill on the line since it was opened in 1965.
November 1996: Propane from a leaking gas-service pipe exploded in downtown
San Juan, Puerto Rico, killing 33 people and injuring 69 others.
August 1996: A pipeline carrying liquid butane ruptured in Lively, Texas,
sending a butane vapor cloud into a residential area. Two residents tried to
escape, but their vehicle's ignition started a fire that killed them.
June 1996: A fuel oil line ruptured near Fork Shoals, S.C., spilling 958,000
gallons into the Reedy River.
May 1996: A gasoline pipeline near Gramercy, La., ruptured and spilled
475,000 gallons of fuel into wetlands and a river.
February 1994: A natural-gas pipeline exploded in Edison, N.J., destroying
three apartment buildings and leaving 1,500 people homeless.
August 1989: Soil tests result in the discovery of a decades-long spill in
an Avila Beach, Calif., pipeline which Union Oil Co. had used for almost 90
years. The entire commercial center of the town was razed in the cleanup
effort, which is continuing (left). Another pipeline nearby was found to
have leaked more than 9 million gallons of crude oil over a 50-year period.
Unocal has agreed to pay more than $48 million in cleanup costs.
May 1989: A gasoline pipeline ruptured in San Bernardino, Calif., killing
two people and destroying 11 homes.
December 1980: A corroded line carrying naphtha ruptured in Long Beach,
Calif. The flammable substance sprayed 20 feet into the air, then ignited,
injuring 5 and destroying or damaging 12 homes.
?
P-I reporter Scott Sunde can be reached at 206-448-8331 or
[email protected]
Confidential: INGAA Member Use only
Terry D. Boss
VP Environment Safety and Operations
INGAA
[email protected]
?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Did this get taken care of?
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT on
04/05/2000 10:13 AM ---------------------------
From: John M Singer @ ENRON 04/04/2000 01:38 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Citygate Production
Yes, CES Retail did take this gas for Jan, Feb & March. The Canonsburg
office was responsible for the noms.
Yes, the deal needs to be input into Sitata. Maybe, Terry can input. Wade
has copies of the monthly invoices from T & F Operating for all three months.
Deal details:
Volume = 10,000 MCF per month
Price for Jan, Feb & Mar = $3.465 / MCF
I would not worry about the Mcf issue here. Just put the volumes and price
in and pay the bill.
John
Chris Germany@ECT
04/04/2000 01:08 PM
To: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Theresa
Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Citygate Production
Hey John, did CES take this gas for Jan, Feb, and Mar? Wade would like to
see this deal in the system.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000 01:06
PM ---------------------------
Chris Germany
04/04/2000 12:02 PM
To: Colleen Sullivan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Breese/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve
Jackson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: John M Singer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Theresa Franklin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dick
Jenkins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Oliver/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joan
Veselack/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Robert Allwein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joann
Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Wade R Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Citygate Production
T&F Operating has sent ENA a "breach of contract" letter and is requesting to
terminate the contract effective 4/1/2000.
Colleen, I will give you a copy of the letter that was faxed to John Singer.
CES did a buy/sale behind Penn Fuel on CGAS for 1 year starting Nov 1, 1999.
T&F is the supplier and Glenn Gary was the market. The market went away
effective 4/1/2000 and ENA/EES has no other market behind this part of Penn
Fuel's system. We checked with the Penn Fuel asset management deal and
according to Penn Fuel, they can't take it either.
T&F is looking for their payment for Jan, Feb, and Mar, and T&F will waive
any and all "cover" cost that ENA would otherwise be liable for subsequent to
April 1, 2000.
John Singer wants to make sure we address the hedges in the books - will this
need to be included in the CES true-up? Also, John wants to know if he
should sign the letter?. Colleen, I told John you would anwser that question.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached is the revised facts section for your opinion letter. Please call
me if you wish to discuss. Also, can you provide an estimate for delivery of
the revised draft opinion. As allways, we need it last week.
Jim
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
z/f trading 4
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
While I am out, a list of files I am currently working on and status can be
found in my directory in "2000 status". Also files are on my desk in alpha
order for GISBs, Master Agreements and others.
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dave will continue to have the Friday afternoon "Budget Meetings" with one
change: effective April 21, 2000 the time will change from
4:00 pm to 3:00 pm.
Date: Fridays This Friday, Aril 14, 2000 remains at 4:00 pm
Time: 3:00 pm - 4:00 pm
Location: 3321
Topic: Budget Meeting
If you have any questions/conflicts, please feel free to call me or Bev
(5-7857).
Thanks,
Kay 3-0643
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Will do. I will be in touch shortly.
-MIR
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:54 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: NW escrow agreement
Hi there,
I believe Chris should be back today, so I wanted to follow up on this.
I don't have any recollection of where we left the escrow agreement with
NW. Please get with MKahn or Jerry DeBerry to see if we can get consensus
on the current form of escrow agreement. Once we have that, Enron (Chris)
will make contact with Citibank.
Thanks,
Kay
Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Amy's latest comments. Can you pls review.
Thanks
Craig
---------------------- Forwarded by Craig Breslau/HOU/ECT on 10/17/2000 02:16
PM ---------------------------
"Mike Cesario" <[email protected]> on 10/17/2000 10:04:11 AM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Fwd: revisions to Ormet contract with Enron re: Burnside
Received: from raptorfw.ormet.com by hanemail; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:30:55 -0400
Received: from [207.247.159.141] by raptorfw.ormet.com via smtpd
(for [10.10.0.3]) with SMTP; 13 Oct 2000 21:24:09 UT
Received: by LK_MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id <SZKZ6VLS>;
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:19:52 -0500
Message-ID: <300EE719F281D311B27E006097742B35661947@LK_MAIL>
From: "Amy L. Baird" <[email protected]>
Sender: Mimi Grisoli <[email protected]>
To: "Mark Kleinginna (E-mail)" <[email protected]>, "Mike Cesario
(E-mail)" <[email protected]>
Subject: revisions to Ormet contract with Enron re: Burnside
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:19:51 -0500
Return-Receipt-To: "Amy L. Baird" <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C0355B.53027B60"
THIS EMAIL IS SENT ON BEHALF OF AMY BAIRD:
Attached is Amy Baird's memo proposing changes to the contract with Enron
for Burnside:
<<LK_227614_1.DOC>> Mimi Grisoli, assistant to Amy Baird
(-:
ATTENTION -- PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY WORK-PRODUCT
This electronic message transmission contains information from the law firm
of Lemle & Kelleher, L.L.P. that may be confidential or privileged. The
information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual or
entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that
any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic
transmission in error, please delete the message and notify the sender
immediately, either by telephone (504) 586-1241 or by electronic mail.
- LK_227614_1.DOC
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I am OK on selling these packages on EOL. This approval is based on my
understanding that all of this capacity is currently posted, or, if not
currently posted, will be posted for the appropriate amount of time prior to
sale. Additionally, this approval is contingent on use of the webtext we
have been using for other EOL deals (I feel the need to say the obvious
because I don't believe Law will see anything on these packages again). I
also assume that these will be short term deals--i.e., less than one year.
Any long term discounted deals raise concerns that our "standard discount
language" is designed to address, such as what is the effect of a new rate
design or reduction in the max rate on the discounted deal. I think we can
live without that language in short term deals for now, but we need to
revisit this issue and come up with a solution before we sell any long term
deals on EOL. ONe last thing, it is marketing's decision whether to include
in the webtext the provision that says Northern gets the $$ if the shipper
releases the capacity at a rate higher than the discounted rate. I think our
approach in negotiated deals has been to get that agreement if we could (a
basis run up could make it a very valuable right). If you have any
questions, call me. DF
From: Craig Buehler 02/12/2001 02:50 PM
To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kent
Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Craig
Buehler/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ranelle Paladino/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Jo
Williams/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steve Kirk/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Linda
Trevino/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: EOL Routing/Approval - Urgent
*** EOL ROUTING ***
Please send your approval by return email, to Craig Buehler, for the EOL
packages listed on
the attached spreadsheet. Each of the packages (22 in total) shows the path,
sustainable capacity
and proposed rate for each product. The rates are estimated to provide a
measure for the dollar
amount of the discount (per our current discount policy). These 22 products
are the initial deals
being offered; subsequent packages will be routed as they are developed.
Please call Craig, at
713-853-6964, if you have questions. After approval by Legal, Reg Affairs
and Marketing, the
approvals and/or comments will be forwarded to Danny McCarty for review.
Thanks,
Craig
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I will be leaving the office early today and will not be here after lunch. I
will be available for urgent issues by cell phone if necessary. Have a great
weekend.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Both the master matrix and EnronOnline datamanager have been updated as per
the note below.
Frank
Leslie Hansen
04/19/2000 10:57 AM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kathy M Moore/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Rhonda L Denton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: San Diego Gas & Electric Company
Please revise the profile for San Diego Gas & Electric Company so that this
CP (i) can both purchase and sell US Western power products and (ii) can
neither purchase nor sell US Eastern power products via EOL.
Rhonda: I'm pretty certain that the matrix already designates the WSPP for
this CP but if it does not, please revise the matrix.
Call me with any questions.
Leslie
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dan,
Westport Oil and Gas Company Inc has agreed to terms for Enron providing
gathering from the inlet of screw compression to Glenrock.
I am faxing to you a term sheet so that we can get Westport a gathering
agreement asap. You can use the latest Quantum agreement as a start.
We are NOT purchasing the gas.
Call me with questions,
Mike
303-575-6488
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
fyi
-----Original Message-----
From: wgramm [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:26 PM
To: Steve Kean
Subject: FERC
Hi, the folks at Koch Industries are BIG fans of Jerry Ellig and would be
willing to work for him for FERC -- they have especially good relationships
with Murkowski, Tauzin, Barton. Wendy
Wendy Gramm, Regulatory Studies Program
Mercatus Center
George Mason University
703-993-4884
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
CERA Alert: Dcember 13, 2000
Title: California on the Brink
CERA Knowledge Areas: Western Energy, N. American Power, N. American Gas
CALIFORNIA ON THE BRINK
The California Stalemate
California moved closer to the brink of an outage today as concerns over
credit-worthiness of buyers brought the possibility that generators would
avoid selling to the California market. While numerous factors have
contributed to the high cost of power incurred by California's utilities, the
root cause of the current crisis is a lack of new generation. The current
credit crisis and its threat to supplies could spark state action to address
the situation. The collective efforts of all market participants should be
focused on increasing generation capacity as quickly as possible.
Western power prices have skyrocketed well beyond the record levels set this
summer. Perhaps because frozen rates insulate the majority of California
consumers and companies from tangible effects of the market crisis,
regulators have been able to postpone meaningful market reforms and
significant rate increases. The California Public Utilities Commission denied
the requests of Pacific Gas & Electric and Southern California Edison to end
their rate freezes, forcing these utilities at least temporarily to finance
the costs of higher wholesale energy. This has created an unsustainable
accumulation of costs and a loss of faith in the California market.
The current credit crisis and the potential for blackouts may become the
galvanizing events that provide state regulators with a public mandate to
address the underlying structural problems in the industry. However, there is
no guarantee that these regulatory actions will expedite an effective
solution for customers and the industry as a whole. Wholesale and retail
markets that emerge from regulatory intervention are likely to remain
muddled. In the necessarily political process that will follow, it is
possible that-as has largely been the case so far-the steps taken will fail
to move the California power market toward a more enduring solution and will
instead continue to mask the underlying structural flaws.
In the six months since California's supply shortfall began plaguing Western
markets, regulators have done little to address the underlying problem.
Rather than addressing the cause of the supply shortage-establishing a market
environment that encourages timely additions of new generating capacity and
demand side responses-efforts are instead directed at trying to lay blame for
the crisis and lessen the immediate financial impact on customers. Indeed,
several actions taken thus far have served more to compound the problem by
discouraging new power plant additions. These include price caps, repeated
changes to market rules, attempts to seize generator profits, and a
challenging siting and permitting process.
Medicine Worse than the Illness
Several years of electricity demand growth and low prices in California were
accompanied by very few additions to the supply base. Regulators did not pay
adequate attention to the looming supply shortfall. The void of consensus
over the cause of the current crisis has instead been replaced by a series of
bandaid remedies that address the symptoms, but not the cause, of
California's electric market woes.*
* Challenging siting and permitting. Despite state action to better
coordinate the siting and permitting process for new power plants, power
plant developers still face high hurdles. Local community opposition alone
has struck down some key proposed facilities.
* Price caps discourage investment. State and federal proposals to cap prices
limit the attractiveness of the California wholesale power market, especially
for developers who have the option of channeling scarce capital and equipment
to more stable or more attractive markets outside the state.
* Repeated rule changes. Frequent rule changes in the ISO markets (including
the price caps) confound attempts by developers to estimate profits from new
plant development.
* Calls for refunds. Despite reports by the Power Exchange, the ISO, and the
FERC that no pattern of abuse could be found from their examination of the
California markets, state officials continue to accuse power providers of
gaming the market. Calls by state officials for refunds of generator profits
are a threat to new plant development.
* Facility inspections. Recent inspections of power plants by state officials
to verify that operators are honestly reporting the operational status of
their generating units accentuates the atmosphere of mistrust.
CERA's recent analysis suggests that merchant plant developers in the West
are not guaranteed? to make a profit. Prospects of new plant profitability
are affected by the timing and quantity of new plants, decommissioning of
older units, demand growth, and numerous other difficult-to-forecast factors.
California's regulatory actions only further cloud the assessment of
financial viability and degrade the political environment for developers
considering entering the state.
Despite efforts by the California ISO to stimulate new capacity additions in
the state with a special, limited-term capacity payment, CERA estimates that
demand growth will continue to outstrip supply additions in the West in 2001.
In addition, the existing siting and permitting process will prevent a
sufficient quantity of capacity from entering the market until 2003 at the
earliest. Therefore, three years remain before a sufficient quantity of
capacity enters service to significantly dampen prices and decrease the risk
of an outage.
The Road to Recovery
There are a number of actions that can be taken to help relieve the capacity
shortfall:
* Encourage new build. Supply must be part of the answer. This requires a
series of steps that can help facilitate new supply build. While in principal
some have been taken, such as new fast track approval, the success of these
actions can only be measured by the build itself. For now, there is still not
enough new supply coming on until 2003 to relieve supply tightness.?
* Stabilize investment climate. Utilities must have assurance that they will
ultimately be allowed to recover market costs for power. This provides the
credit worthiness needed by sellers to produce energy and to stimulate new
build.
* Move toward more balanced utility supply portfolios. One of the reasons the
pressure on customers has been so intense in California has been the absence
(and even discouragement) of diverse supply portfolios among the utilities in
the state-particularly for residential and small commercial customers. With
the market at a peak, however, now is in one sense a sub-optimal time to move
toward term contracting. Yet these contracts provide the foundation for a
series of actions-including new supply build and demand side investments. If
they end up above market, they will at least have achieved the desired effect
of knocking down prices, a fact which by itself should provide sufficient
justification for recovering the cost of these commitments.
* Encourage market mechanisms that elicit a demand response. Although
originally a feature of California's market design, most consumers are
insulated from price spikes through capped or frozen retail rates. Exposing
customers to at least some of the market price signals would encourage a
demand response.
* Encourage market mechanisms that dampen the "Boom Bust" characteristic of
the market. Whether in the form of a capacity payment, a reserve requirement,
or a minimum term portfolio requirement, the California power market needs to
move to a structure that encourages investment in new capacity when the
market is in balance rather than waiting for a shortage and price shock to
elicit new investment. Such a structure can help dampen (but not eliminate)
future price volatility.
* Avoid continuously tinkering with the market. While the market does need to
be restructured as described above, it also needs to be stable and reliable
to encourage the development of new supply as well as a robust long-term
contractual market for power in California. Continually tinkering with the
market structure-such as the three times the price cap has been shifted since
July-only serves to undermine confidence in the market. California needs to
do its best to develop a long-term solution and then let the market run its
course.
* Allow for greater environmental flexibility. The state should explore a
more balanced solution to emissions restrictions in the face of a supply
shortfall that has been exacerbated by generators that cannot operate due to
emissions restrictions.
* Free PURPA power plants to generate. Relief should be granted to PURPA
power plants that are operational, but are restricted by contract from
operating to generate only power.
**end**
This CERA Alert will be available in PDF format within 24 hours.
**********************************************************************
This electronic message and attachments, if any, contain information
from Cambridge Energy Research Associates, Inc. (CERA) which is
confidential and may be privileged. Unauthorized disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the contents of this message or any attachments,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited.
Terms of Use: http://www.cera.com/tos.html
Questions/Comments: [email protected]
Copyright 2000. Cambridge Energy Research Associates
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 09/26/2000
02:00 PM ---------------------------
From: David Parquet on 09/25/2000 11:03 AM PDT
To: Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Andrew Kelemen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Don
Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: PG&E Questions
My responses to one set of PG&E questions would be as follows. Dean is
answering the other one and will send back to you directly.
* What is Enron's intent re: continuing involvement? PG&E is
concerned about any potential requirements that they might be required to
either purchase fuel from Enron or engage Enron as the power marketer.
RESPONSE: Enron is very flexible re continuing involvement: scheduling
coordination, fuel supply, power marketing, etc. We are also flexible re the
time period and the terms of the continuing involvement. Whatever
arrangement is developed would be mutually beneficial.
* What is status of EPC negotiations. Will they be required to engage
NEPCO as the EPC contractor? Does the EPC contractor have control over the
turbines?
RESPONSE: o EPC negotiations are complete with NEPCO. Contract has not been
executed, but has been "put on the shelf" awaiting decision on successful
bidder for the purchase of the Pastoria project from ENA. Successful bidder
and NEPCO will each have the option of executing the EPC agreement.
o Successful bidder is under no obligation to engage NEPCO.
o West LB has control of the turbines. They can be assigned either to the
LLC or to ENA. (If assigned to ENA, it was because the successful bidder for
the Pastoria project did not want the turbines with the acquisition.) If
assigned to the LLC as part of the acquisition, the LLC can then assign the
turbines to the ultimate EPC contractor.
* They also questioned whether there would be any "agricultural
restrictions"?
RESPONSE: The project site is presently under a Williamson Act contract to
maintain agricultural use in exchange for lower taxes. Last week, the Kern
County Board of Supervisors voted to cancel the Williamson Act contract to
allow for industrial use, which started a 180 day public comment period.
However, the Governor has on his desk a bill for signature that would reduce
the public comment period for the cancellation to the same time frame as the
request for rehearing period for the CEC Final Decision. (The Governor has
until 9/30 sign the bill and is expected to do so because of the overwhelming
support of the bill in the Assembly and the Senate.) The cancellation will
be contingent upon a successful CEC decision and a payment of a Williamson
Act cancellation fee.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 04/17/2001 03:03 PM -----
"Weller, Andrea" <[email protected]>
04/17/2001 03:01 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc: "'Fairchild, Tracy'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: SENATORS CALL FOR INVESTIGATION INTO EFFECTIVENESS OF FEDERAL
ENERGY REGULATION
I thought you should all be aware that this call is out there....
Andrea Weller
Market Strategist
Strategic Energy, LLC
949.230.3404
[email protected]
SENATORS CALL FOR INVESTIGATION INTO EFFECTIVENESS OF FEDERAL ENERGY
REGULATION
Senators Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., and Jean Carnahan, D-Mo., have asked the
General Accounting Office (GAO) to inquire into whether the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) is carrying out its responsibilities to ensure
that wholesale electricity sales throughout the country are reasonable and
that interstate natural gas pipelines are fulfilling their obligations to
customers. "Under federal law, FERC has the responsibility to ensure just
and
reasonable prices for interstate wholesale transmission," the Senators said
in a letter to GAO, "but there is mounting evidence that FERC may not have
fulfilled this role in the California situation." Following is text of the
letter:
April 12, 2001
Mr. David M. Walker
Comptroller General of the United States
U.S. General Accounting Office
441 G Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20548
Dear Mr. Walker:
We have been watching with dismay as the state of California suffers
sporadic
rolling blackouts with impacts on electricity supplies and prices throughout
the western United States, a situation that may get worse this summer when
the demand for electricity increases. We understand that there are many
factors that have contributed to the current situation, and few short term
options to create more electricity for this market. At the same time we are
extremely troubled that California's Independent System Operator (ISO)
recently asserted that suppliers of electricity in California have allegedly
been charging many times more than what it actually costs to generate the
electricity, an overcharge amounting to $6.8 billion according to the
operator. Some experts believe that these high prices reflect a
non-functioning market that has, in turn, exacerbated the state's
electricity
shortage.With the possibility of electricity deregulation occurring soon in
additional states such as Missouri, we are concerned whether there is
adequate federal oversight to guard against potential abuse of market power
by suppliers. Without such oversight, the nation may not progress towards
achieving what many see as the promise of deregulation: lower consumer
prices, greater reliability, increased choice, and more efficient
generation.
Deregulation legislation being considered in Missouri would transfer the
oversight authority from the Missouri Public Service Commission (PSC), which
works closely with the utilities to provide direction if there are capacity
or reliability concerns and sets appropriate customer rates, to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Under federal law, FERC has the
responsibility to ensure just and reasonable prices for interstate wholesale
transmission, but there is mounting evidence that FERC may not have
fulfilled
this role in the California situation. FERC Commissioner William Massey
recently said: "Ensuring just and reasonable prices in wholesale markets
requires that we clearly define market power, and aggressively intervene
when
the markets are not producing reasonable prices. The commission's actions to
date have been insufficient." (March 20, 2001 testimony to the House Energy
Committee's Subcommittee on Energy and Air quality).We are requesting that
the General Accounting Office (GAO) assess whether FERC is properly
exercising its role to enforce reasonable electricity rates. Specifically,
we
ask GAO to answer the following questions:
1) Has FERC fulfilled its mandate to ensure just and reasonable rates? Is
FERC adequately monitoring and appropriately regulating based on its
statutes
power supply, demand, and pricing in California? In other Western states? In
the Central Midwest and in the Northeast?
2) Has FERC devoted sufficient resources to carry out its oversight
obligations in a timely and effective manner? And does FERC have the
necessary resources to carry out its future oversight role?
3) Does FERC need additional authority to carry out its mission of ensuring
just and reasonable prices given that widespread partial deregulation is now
occurring in so many states?
4) As we understand the situation from some experts, the number of
transactions in electricity that occur in the deregulated wholesale market
place is voluminous. This situation may increase the difficulties of
guarding
against market abuse. Is there a role for another agency or independent
organization to exercise an oversight role with respect to these
transactions? If so, what would be an appropriate oversight role?
5) We have been advised by some experts that greater transparency of prices
relating to the buying and selling of electricity in a deregulated market
would help guard against market abuses. We understand the need to keep
prices
confidential for a period of time to ensure against collusion. After this
appropriate period of time has passed, would greater transparency be
beneficial?
We are also concerned about recent allegations by the California Public
Utility Commission (CPUC) that market power has been abused in the
transmission of natural gas, which has in turn contributed to the spiraling
cost of electricity generation in the state. The CPUC maintains that the
price of natural gas transmitted by the El Paso pipeline has been
manipulated
so that prices in California over the last year have been up to five times
the national average. Because an increasing number of states, including
California, rely heavily on natural gas fired power plants, any manipulation
of that commodity can have severe consequences. Additionally, because such a
large percent of our future nationwide generation capacity will use natural
gas, we are concerned that these types of alleged market abuses will have
even more profound effects. Therefore, we ask GAO to answer the following
questions:
1) Has FERC fully met its responsibilities to adequately regulate interstate
pipelines? If not, what areas require improvement?
2) Is there a continuing role for FERC to play in ensuring equal access to
the limited amount of space in our current natural gas pipelines? Should
this
role be enhanced or clarified, and if so, how?
3) Is there the possibility of this same type of alleged abuse in other
parts
of the country, aside from California, where the natural gas pipeline
capacity is similarly limited? Please provide any details.We appreciate all
the good work that GAO does and we look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,J
oseph I. Lieberman
Jean Carnahan
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Bob,
Sally is out all day w/ UT recruiting function. She will not be back into the office until 8:00 Thursday for CommodityLogic meeting. I am forwarding this to Bob Hall - please check with him regarding how he would like this handled.
Thanks,
PT
Robert Superty
03/27/2001 05:14 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Material for Commodity Logic meeting
Sally, I have attached a brief document with the material you requested for Thursday's Commodity Logic meeting.
Let me know if you would like to hand this out or just have me discuss without handouts.
Tks - Bob Superty
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Complimentary copies of the recently published Special Issue of the
California? Management Review, the Haas School of Business's management
journal, are now available for Haas students in the student lounges and
program offices.?
The contents of this Special Issue on Health Care are:
"The Business of Health Care Concerns Us All:An Introduction"Sara L. Beckman
and Michael L. Katz
"Deregulation and Regulatory Backlash in Health Care"James C. Robinson
"In Loco Parentis?The Purchaser Role in Managed Care"Linda Bergthold, Suzanne
Olson Koebler, and Sara J. Singer
"Structural Problems of Managed Care in Californiaand Some Options for
Ameliorating Them"Sara J. Singer and Alain C. Enthoven
"Managing Organizational Transformations:Lessons from the Veterans Health
Administration"Gary J. Young
"Structural and Organizational Issues In Patient Safety:A Comparison of
Health Care to Other High-Hazard Industries"David M. Gaba
"The President and the Power of the Purchaser:Consumer Protection and Managed
Care in the United State"sDaniel P. Gitterman
--
__________________________________
California Management Review
University of California
F501 Haas School of Business #1900
Berkeley, CA 94720-1900
phone: (510) 642-7159
fax: (510) 642-1318
e-mail: [email protected]
web site: http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/cmr/
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dear E204-1,2 students,
Please find attached the Excel files used as examples in lecture.
Also, remember to form your project teams (4 or 5 members)
if you haven't already -- sign-ups next week.
--Tom McCullough
- E204_OrangeMicroCptr.xls
- E204-Harrus Feeding.xls
- E204_TransGlobalAir_LP.xls
- E204_Transshipment.xls
- E204_TempLeasing.xls
- MERTON1A.xls
- MERTON3A.xls
=======================================================================
Tom McCullough
Senior Lecturer
Haas School of Business
University of California at Berkeley
==========================================================================
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Just so you know, I spoke with the group this morning about contracting
practices and they agreed to do the Christine/Susan/dealmaker huddle prior to
sending any contracts out. It helps that I have Kevin's support on this. I
think it will work fine.
TK is going make sure Tenaska gets credited. The difference between actual
and billed amounts is very little.
Thanks for your attention to this last week.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Anyone interested in PAINTBALL ... on the 13th May (Sunday) ?
I was thinking that could either go to:
http://home.houston.rr.com/houstonpaintball/paintball-fields.html#TWISTED
or
http://home.houston.rr.com/houstonpaintball/paintball-fields.html#AVILLAGE
... you can get an idea of the costs etc.
Forward this to anyone who you think would like to go.
Please let me know before COB Thursday so I can gauge the numbers.
-Colin
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
[IMAGE] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]
Market Watch [IMAGE] Largest Short Postition Decreases [IMAGE] Largest Short Postition Increases [IMAGE] Lock-up Expiry Dates [IMAGE] IPO Quiet Periods Expiries [IMAGE] IPO Withdrawals [IMAGE] Analyst EPS Change - Upside [IMAGE] Analyst EPS Change - Downside [IMAGE] Highest Analyst Activity [IMAGE] Earnings Calendar - This Week [IMAGE] Upcoming Splits [IMAGE] Stock Splits [IMAGE] Coverage Initiation [IMAGE] Coverage Re-Iteration HelpDesk [IMAGE] Unsubscribe [IMAGE] Update my Membership / Profile [IMAGE] Forgot Username / Password [IMAGE]Add / Edit Alerts [IMAGE]View My Alerts [IMAGE] As requested, your News Alert for BRCM follows from EquityAlert.com. Broadcom Updates Second Quarter 2001 Financial Outlook; Conference Call Scheduled Thursday, June 7, 8:45 a.m. Eastern Time IRVINE, Calif., Jun 6, 2001 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Broadcom Corporation (Nasdaq:BRCM) today updated the outlook for its financial performance for the second quarter ending June 30, 2001. "The continued weakness in the technology sector requires that we lower expectations for second quarter revenue to a decrease of between 32% and 35% from the first quarter," said Dr. Henry T. Nicholas III, Broadcom's President and CEO. "Although current demand conditions continue to be soft, we are starting to see some signs of stabilization in the business for the second half of the year. We also continue to introduce new market-leading products and to gain important design wins with customers that position us well to compete effectively in our markets as the economy recovers." "In response to the numerous acquisitions made in the last two years and the current more challenging economic climate, we are taking steps to streamline our business," Nicholas continued. "Accordingly, in the first quarter earnings conference call on April 18, we indicated that we were conducting a thorough review of all of our business units with the intent of making reductions in some areas and increasing the level of strategic investment in others. We are beginning to implement these plans during the current quarter. This will result in business unit re-alignment, net staffing reductions, facility consolidations, and other actions that will result in an associated charge to be taken during the second quarter." Conference Call Broadcom will conduct a conference call with analysts and investors to discuss its updated second quarter outlook tomorrow (Thursday June 7) at 8:45 a.m. Eastern Time (5:45 a.m. Pacific Time). The company will broadcast the conference over the Internet. To listen to the call, please visit the Investor Information section of the Broadcom Website at www.broadcom.com/investor or go to www.streetfusion.com. The Webcast will be recorded and available for replay until 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time on June 14, 2001. About Broadcom Broadcom Corporation is the leading provider of highly integrated silicon solutions that enable broadband communications and networking of voice, video and data services. Using proprietary technologies and advanced design methodologies, Broadcom designs, develops and supplies complete system-on-a-chip solutions and related applications for digital cable set-top boxes and cable modems, high-speed local, metropolitan and wide area and optical networks, home networking, Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), carrier access, residential broadband gateways, direct broadcast satellite and terrestrial digital broadcast, digital subscriber lines (xDSL), wireless communications, System I/O(TM) server solutions and network processing. Broadcom is headquartered in Irvine, Calif., and may be contacted at 949-450-8700 or at www.broadcom.com. Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: This release and our comments during the conference call may contain forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, and reflect management's beliefs and certain assumptions made by us based upon information available to us at this time. Words such as "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "may," "will" and variations of these words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements that refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date hereof. Such information is subject to change, and we will not necessarily inform you of such changes. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Important factors that may cause such a difference for Broadcom include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions and specific conditions in the markets we address, including the recent significant economic slowdown in the technology sector and semiconductor industry; the timing, rescheduling or cancellation of significant customer orders; the loss of a key customer; the effectiveness of our expense and product cost control and reduction efforts; changes in our product or customer mix; results of changes in our accounting for performance-based warrants; our ability to specify, develop or acquire, complete, introduce, market and transition to volume production new products and technologies in a timely manner; the timing of customer-industry qualification and certification of our products and the risks of non-qualification or non-certification; the rate at which our present and future customers and end-users adopt Broadcom's technologies and products in our target markets; delays in the adoption and acceptance of industry standards in those markets; the volume of our product sales and pricing concessions on volume sales; the qualification, availability and pricing of competing products and technologies and the resulting effects on sales and pricing of our products; intellectual property disputes and customer indemnification claims and other types of litigation risk; the availability and pricing of foundry and assembly capacity and raw materials; the risks inherent in our acquisitions of technologies and businesses, including the successful completion of technology and product development through volume production, integration issues and costs, and contractual, intellectual property and other issues; fluctuations in the manufacturing yields of our third party semiconductor foundries and other problems or delays in the fabrication, assembly, testing or delivery of our products; the risks of producing products with new suppliers and at new fabrication and assembly facilities; problems or delays that we may face in shifting our products to smaller geometry process technologies and in achieving higher levels of design integration; the effects of new and emerging technologies; the risks and uncertainties associated with our international operations; our ability to retain and hire key executives, technical personnel and other employees in the numbers, with the capabilities, and at the compensation levels needed to implement our business and product plans; the quality of our products and any remediation costs; the effects of natural disasters and other events beyond our control; the level of orders received that can be shipped in a fiscal quarter; and other factors. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, recent Current Reports on Forms 8-K and 8-K/A, and other Securities and Exchange Commission filings discuss some of the important risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason. Note to Editors: Broadcom(R), the pulse logo(R), and SystemI/O(TM) are trademarks of Broadcom Corporation and/or its affiliates in the United States and certain other countries. All other trademarks mentioned are the property of their respective owners. CONTACT: Broadcom Corporation, Irvine Bill Blanning or Eileen Algaze (business press) 949/585-5555 or 949/585-5971 Corporate Communications [email protected] [email protected] or Nick Kormeluk, 949/585-6932 (investor relations) Director, Investor Relations [email protected] URL: http://www.businesswire.com Today's News On The Net - Business Wire's full file on the Internet with Hyperlinks to your home page. Copyright (C) 2001 Business Wire. All rights reserved. -0- KEYWORD: CALIFORNIA INDUSTRY KEYWORD: COMPUTERS/ELECTRONICS TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKING INTERNET EARNINGS CONFERENCE CALLS [IMAGE] ***IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER REGARDING THIS COURTESY EMAIL*** At your request, as a subscriber to our service, this email alert is being sent to you as a courtesy and is for information purposes only. We are a financial news re-distributor. We are not an investment advisory and do not purport to tell or suggest which companies you should monitor or which securities you should purchase or sell. In addition to the information regarding the company you are monitoring (the "Monitored Company"), this email contains advertisements describing products, services or companies for which we receive fees from the advertising companies. In the case of Global Acquisitions Inc. we received $5,750. In the case of Micron Enviro Systems, Inc. we received a fee of three hundred and sixty thousand free trading shares of Micron Enviro Systems, Inc. from Clarion Investments, Inc. We reserve the right to sell all or part of these shares at anytime, either before, during or after the advertisement period. In addition, not withstanding our policy of prohibiting employees from buying or selling securities of an advertising company for a period of 20 days following dissemination of the advertisement, we may not be able to effectively monitor our employees to ensure compliance with the same. Consequently, there may be sales and/or purchases of such securities by our employees prior to, during and immediately following the dissemination of the advertisement. Please note that (1) this email may not contain the full text of the press release issued by, or the research or other reports regarding, the Monitored Company; and (2) the text of the advertisement, the press release and/or reports were obtained from third party sources and were not written, generated or edited by us; accordingly, we make no representations or give any assurance as to the accuracy or completeness, nor have we conducted any independent investigations of, the disclosures regarding the subject matter of such releases and reports. Please note that links to the advertising company and/or Monitored Company are provided for your convenience. We assume no obligation for the content of such sites. All information contained herein should be independently verified by you with the advertising company or with Monitored Company or any other sources you prefer. [THIS IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO, THE "EQUITYALERT SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT AND DISCLAIMER." PLEASE VISIT http://www.equityalert.com/home/disclaim.asp FOR ACCESS TO OUR COMPLETE DISCLAIMER] [IMAGE] [IMAGE]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Eric,
This is to update you on the current situation with the OSTRIP function in Exotica. After some lengthy analysis of the function, its inputs and the documentation associated with it, it was brought to our attention in the Research Group that the OSTRIP function was being utilized in different manners by different people within Enron. In order to remedy this situation, the documentation of Exotica was revised and more details were added, so as to make explicitly clear the distinctions between the fixed price options and forward start options. (You will find attached a copy of the most recent version of the Exotica documentation.)
In addition to discussions with Santiago Garcia in structuring, it was seen to be important to ensure that those responsible for booking the options in ERMS (specifically, Jeremy Wong) be updated on the changes. By pure coincidence, the two ways that inputs were made for fixed price options gave the same values for the premiums. However, one methodology is really incorrect as far as the documentation is concerned, and the attempt has been made to rectify this. The forward start option pricing has not changed in any way.
I would like to arrange a meeting tomorrow afternoon (Thursday) between all those parties concerned to ensure uniformity of pricing across the board. If you are available, I would appreciate it if we could meet at around 4:00 PM.
Regards,
Tom Barkley
Manager, Research
Enron Wholesale Services
Houston, TX
(713) 345-7317
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
i think it would be a good idea because sounds like they want to sue to
collect.
Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX 77002
Tel: (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
Dan J Hyvl
07/24/2000 10:18 AM
To: Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cage Gas
No. Do you want me to?
Lisa Mellencamp
07/24/2000 10:13 AM
To: Russell Diamond/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S
Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Cage Gas
dan have you talked to richard sanders about this??
Lisa J. Mellencamp
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith St.
Houston, TX 77002
Tel: (713) 853-7986
Fax: (713) 646-3393
Russell Diamond
07/21/2000 05:32 PM
To: Dan J Hyvl/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Mellencamp/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Cage Gas
Dan,
Lisa,
I am assuming we have not heard anything from Cage, and it has been 12 days
since we sent them the letter notifying of the amounts they owe us.
I guess we can move on to the next step.
Please advise,
Russell
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
This email confirms that you sent an auction payment for $44.00 to
[email protected] for item# 1013259638.
View the details of this transaction online at:
https://www.paypal.com/vst/id=6N5301245K300360V
------------------------------
Auction Information
------------------------------
Auction Site: eBay
Item URL: http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1013259638&ed=1002300969
Auction Title: item# 1013259638
Item Number: 1013259638
Close Date: October 05, 2001
------------------------------
Jason Wolfe's CONFIRMED Address
------------------------------
Jason Wolfe
2300 W. Alabama
Apt. 6
Houston, TX 77098
USA
Thank you for using PayPal!
The PayPal Team
Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address
cannot be answered. For assistance, login to your PayPal
account and choose the "Help" link in the footer of any page.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The report named: CE P/L by Location <http://trv.corp.enron.com/linkFromExcel.asp?report_cd=24&report_name=CE+P/L+by+Location&category_cd=3&category_name=CENTRAL&toc_hide=1&sTV1=3&TV1Exp=Y¤t_efct_date=11/19/2001>, published as of 11/19/2001 is now available for viewing on the website.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Long conference calls make me happy about having email.
Do you want Brian/Lisa/anyone else commercial?
Kay
From: Sheila Tweed@ECT on 09/18/2000 11:03 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: GE Meeting/ premeeting
Good morning! I'm on a lenghthy conference call but I think we should rally
the troops. Steve Swift has confirmed that al;l at GE are prepaared for a
call tomorrow at 1:30pm Houston time. Could you get our guys assembled? I
have one meeting for 30 minutes at 3pm. Otherwise I'm available. Thanks!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Please print out the attached on my letterhead & bring it over to me. Thank
you!!
---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 01/11/2000
03:03 PM ---------------------------
Lorraine Lindberg
01/11/2000 02:32 PM
To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Red Cedar Letter
Here it is.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Unfortunately, Ken Lay will be out of the country during this time.
Rosalee
"Adell Ervin" <[email protected]> on 05/09/2001 10:19:46 AM
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Board Trip to Washington, D.C. -- June 6 & 7, 2001
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
May 9, 2001
?
?
TO:
Kenneth Lay
ENRON
?
?
FROM:
Anne Culver, Government Affairs
Greater Houston Partnership
?
?
SUBJECT:
Board Trip to Washington, D.C. -- June 6 & 7, 2001
?
The purpose of this memo is to invite you to participate in the Partnership,s
annual Board lobby trip to Washington, D.C.? This year,s trip, to be led by
the Partnership Chairman Bruce LaBoon and Government Relations Advisory
Committee Bill Wise, will occur Wednesday, June 6 and Thursday, June 7.? The
delegation will leave Houston at approximately 3 p.m. on the 6th and return
to Houston around 9 p.m. on the 7th.
?
You are likely familiar with the format for these trips.? We expect to secure
use of Partnership-member corporate planes for air transport.? The
Partnership will book hotel rooms for June 6, with participants responsible
for hotel charges (approximately $300-$350); ground transport and meals will
be arranged by the Partnership.
?
We,ll spend the full day the 7th in meetings.? The itinerary is in
development.? We are planning a breakfast meeting with the full Houston area
delegation and meetings with our two Senators, EPA, DOT, DOE, House
Transportation Appropriations Chairman Rogers of Kentucky, and with the
President,s staff at the White House.? We,ll end the day with a reception at
the Capitol to which we will invite the entire Texas delegation, Houstonians
in the Administration, the Texas Office of State-Federal Relations,
Washington-based staff of Partnership-member companies, and so forth.
?
As you can imagine, it is easier for us to secure meetings when we can
confirm the names of those who will be in our group.? Please indicate your
ability to join the trip by checking the form below and returning it as soon
as possible either by return email or fax to 713-844-0257.? Detailed briefing
books and a final itinerary will be provided to you before your departure.
?
Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions you may have, at
713-844-3624.? These trips have always proven to be substantive, informative,
educational . . . and sort of fun, too!? I do hope you can join the Board
delegation and will return the RSVP right away.? Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------
____? ????????????? YES, I will go on the June 6 & 7 trip.? I understand the
time commitment is ???????? 3 p.m. June 6 through 9 p.m. June 7.? I
understand that I am responsible for ??? all my hotel charges for the night
of the 6th (Partnership will book the hotel ??????????????????????? for
you.)? My social security number, for White House clearance purposes is
??????????????????????? _______________________________.
?
____??????????????? NO, cannot participate.
?
- header.htm
- image001.wmz
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dear Vince:
It was great talking to you on Friday. Thank you very
much for the opportunity and your time.
After having talked with you and other people in the
group, I was very impressed by Enron research group's
deep insights, high professionalism, and the friendly
attitude. I really wish that I could have the
opportunity to join the group and contribute to the
future success of the research group with my solid
background in finance and econometrics.
If you have any questions, please feel free to let me
know. I look forward to hearing from you soon, thank
you very much.
sincerely,
Charles
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE.
http://im.yahoo.com/
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
praise for Bush from Andrew Sullivan, prominent liberal. interesting.
Andrew Sullivan in the London Times
No eloquence can match the impact of their evil. Americans' critical
weakness in the past two decades has been their reluctance to shed blood
for their goals. They believed they could construct a huge military and
never have it fight real wars and suffer real casualties. They thought they
could alter history and advance their interests from the air alone. With
the exception of the Gulf War, which they hesitated to finish, they have
shrunk from the fight. When the current enemy struck again and again
throughout the 1990s, Bill Clinton responded without real credibility,
struck back without real endurance, enraged the terrorists without truly
hurting them. We are now living with the consequences of his appeasement,
and of his refusal to challenge Americans beyond what the polls said they
already wanted to do. Whoever launched this war on Americans has now
accomplished the task Clinton didn't dare embark on. America has been
bloodied as it has never been bloodied before.
I would be a fool to predict what happens next. But it is clear that Bush
will not do a Clinton. This will not be a surgical strike. It will not be a
gesture. It may not even begin in earnest soon. But it will be deadly
serious. It is clear that there is no way that the United States can
achieve its goals without the cooperation of many other states - an
alliance as deep and as broad as that which won the Gulf War. It is also
clear that this cannot be done by airpower alone. As in 1941, the neglect
of the military under Bill Clinton and the parsimony of its financing even
under Bush must now not merely be ended but reversed. We may see the
biggest defense build-up since the early 1980s - and not just in weaponry
but in manpower. It is also quite clear that the U.S. military presence in
the Middle East must be ramped up exponentially, its intelligence
overhauled, its vigilance heightened exponentially. In some ways, Bush has
already assembled the ideal team for such a task: Powell for the diplomatic
dance, Rumsfeld for the deep reforms he will now have the opportunity to
enact, Cheney as his most trusted aide in what has become to all intents
and purposes a war cabinet.
The terrorists have done the rest. The middle part of the country - the
great red zone that voted for Bush - is clearly ready for war. The decadent
Left in its enclaves on the coasts is not dead - and may well mount what
amounts to a fifth column. But by striking at the heart of New York City,
the terrorists ensured that at least one deep segment of the country
ill-disposed toward a new president is now the most passionate in his
defense. Anyone who has ever tried to get one over on a New Yorker knows
what I mean. The demons who started this have no idea about the kind of
people they have taken on.
But what the terrorists are also counting on is that Americans will not
have the stomach for the long haul. They clearly know that the coming
retaliation will not be the end but the beginning. And when the terrorists
strike back again, they have let us know that the results could make the
assault on the World Trade Center look puny. They are banking that
Americans will then cave. They have seen a great country quarrel to the
edge of constitutional crisis over a razor-close presidential election.
They have seen it respond to real threats in the last few years with
squeamish restraint or surgical strikes. They have seen that, as Israel has
been pounded by the same murderous thugs, the United States has responded
with equanimity. They have seen a great nation at the height of its power
obsess for a whole summer over a missing intern and a randy Congressman.
They have good reason to believe that this country is soft, that it has no
appetite for the war that has now begun. They have gambled that in response
to unprecedented terror, the Americans will abandon Israel to the
barbarians who would annihilate every Jew on the planet, and trade away
their freedom for a respite from terror in their own land.
We cannot foresee the future. But we know the past. And that past tells us
that these people who destroyed the heart of New York City have made a
terrible mistake. This country is at its heart a peaceful one. It has done
more to help the world than any other actor in world history. It saved the
world from the two greatest evils of the last century in Nazism and Soviet
Communism. It responded to its victories in the last war by pouring aid
into Europe and Japan. In the Middle East, America alone has ensured that
the last hope of the Jewish people is not extinguished and has given more
aid to Egypt than to any other country. It risked its own people to save
the Middle East from the pseudo-Hitler in Baghdad. America need not have
done any of this. Its world hegemony has been less violent and less
imperial than any other comparable power in history. In the depths of its
soul, it wants its dream to itself, to be left alone, to prosper among
others, and to welcome them to the freedom America has helped secure.
But whenever Americans have been challenged, they have risen to the task.
In some awful way, these evil thugs may have done us a favor. America may
have woken up for ever. The rage that will follow from this grief and shock
may be deeper and greater than anyone now can imagine. Think of what the
United States ultimately did to the enemy that bombed Pearl Harbor. Now
recall that American power in the world is all but unchallenged by any
other state. Recall that America has never been wealthier, and is at the
end of one of the biggest booms in its history. And now consider the extent
of this wound - the greatest civilian casualties since the Civil War, an
assault not just on Americans but on the meaning of America itself. When
you take a step back, it is hard not to believe that we are now in the
quiet moment before the whirlwind. Americans will recover their dead, and
they will mourn them, and then they will get down to business. Their
sadness will be mingled with an anger that will make the hatred of these
evil fanatics seem mild.
I am reminded of a great American poem written by Herman Melville after the
death of Abraham Lincoln, the second founder of the country:
"There is sobbing of the strong,
And a pall upon the land;
But the People in their weeping
Bare the iron hand;
Beware the People weeping
When they bare the iron hand."
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 09/04/2000
11:10 AM ---------------------------
Scott Neal
08/30/2000 10:45 AM
To: Brad McKay/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fletcher J Sturm/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas A
Martin/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Arnold/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sandra F
Brawner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike Maggi/Corp/Enron@Enron, Larry May/Corp/Enron@Enron,
Peter F Keavey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: API and API Crude, Distillate & Unleaded Stocks Graphs
---------------------- Forwarded by Scott Neal/HOU/ECT on 08/30/2000 10:44 AM
---------------------------
John Griffith@ENRON
08/30/2000 09:45 AM
To: Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jared Kaiser/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: API and API Crude, Distillate & Unleaded Stocks Graphs
---------------------- Forwarded by John Griffith/Corp/Enron on 08/30/2000
10:30 AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 08/29/2000 05:42:49 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: API and API Crude, Distillate & Unleaded Stocks Graphs
The information contained herein is based on sources that we believe to be
reliable, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete. Nothing
contained herein should be considered as an offer to sell or a solicitation
of an offer to buy any financial instruments discussed herein. Any
opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author. As such, they
may differ in material respects from those of, or expressed or published by
on behalf of Carr Futures or its officers, directors, employees or
affiliates. , 2000 Carr Futures
The charts are now in the most recent version of Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and they
should print clearly from Adobe Acrobat Reader 3.0 or higher. Adobe Acrobat
Reader 4.0 may be downloaded for FREE from www.adobe.com.
(See attached file: UnleadedStocks.pdf)(See attached file: CrudeStocks.pdf)
(See attached file: HeatingOilStocks.pdf)(See attached file:
PADDIIstocksCL.pdf)(See attached file: PADDIstocksHO.pdf)(See attached
file: PADDIstocksHU.pdf)(See attached file: API.pdf)
- UnleadedStocks.pdf
- CrudeStocks.pdf
- HeatingOilStocks.pdf
- PADDIIstocksCL.pdf
- PADDIstocksHO.pdf
- PADDIstocksHU.pdf
- API.pdf
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Susan,
Sara Shackleton is wondering if you are going to call her back today or do I
need to schedule a new conference call for tomorrow?
Kaye Ellis
Assistant to Sara Shackleton
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Leslie, I'll follow up with Mike McGowan. Is there an invoice or something
floating around that you are aware of? Shall we just send to you Tom and
have you get it to the right place? I'm not sure anyone has been hired yet
to fill Tim's position, but I know that is in progress. Mike--please give me
a call re: this. Thanks. DF
Leslie Lawner@EES
08/21/2000 09:13 AM
To: Tom Rutherford <[email protected]> @ ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Richardson dinner
Drew, Tom has informed me that Enron has never paid for the table that Tim
Aron got for the Secretary Richardson fundraiser (last April) and the tab is
$2500. I know in hindsight we may not want to give Richardson any money
since he blew his chance at becoming VP (just joking) but we do need to pay.
Tom's email address is above and perhaps he can tell you where to mail the
check.
I also have a couple of other obligations that Tim Aron undertook that I need
to follow up on, has someone been hired, or should I go through you?
Thanks.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
it was ok. we went to the lsu game and lsu lost so we came home that night. what did you do this weekend?
-----Original Message-----
From: Erin Richardson <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 9:30 AM
To: Lenhart, Matthew
Subject:
i didn't get your message until late last night. what's going on? did you
have a good weekend
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Due to some technical issues, ERCOT is 5 days behind on the following
extracts:
- Settlements & Billing
- Load
- Generation
We are working to get caught up by Wednesday.
ERCOT Client Relations
[email protected]
512-248-3900
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Andrea Truppin
New York, NY 10024
[email protected]
To Mr. Ken Lay,
I'm writing to urge you to donate the millions of dollars you made from selling Enron stock before the company declared bankruptcy to funds, such as Enron Employee Transition Fund and REACH, that benefit the company's employees, who lost their retirement savings, and provide relief to low-income consumers in California, who can't afford to pay their energy bills. Enron and you made millions out of the pocketbooks of California consumers and from the efforts of your employees.
Indeed, while you netted well over a $100 million, many of Enron's employees were financially devastated when the company declared bankruptcy and their retirement plans were wiped out. And Enron made an astronomical profit during the California energy crisis last year. As a result, there are thousands of consumers who are unable to pay their basic energy bills and the largest utility in the state is bankrupt.
The New York Times reported that you sold $101 million worth of Enron stock while aggressively urging the company's employees to keep buying it. Please donate this money to the funds set up to help repair the lives of those Americans hurt by Enron's underhanded dealings.
Sincerely,
Andrea Truppin
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Your approval is required for William Smith to attend the following class.
To grant approval, send a reply to "[email protected]" (NotesMail: LeRea
Pharr/HOU/ECT@ECT).
Be sure to include employee's name and class number in reply.
Excel 97, Range Names and Database Features
Session Dates & Times:
4/11/2000 8:30:00 AM-11:30:00 AM
Location: EB572
No Show/Participant Fee: $ 110.00
If you have any questions, please call the Technology Training Coordinator at
713-853-1816.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Chris--Sheet2 of the attached spreadsheet contains projections of our March
'00
gas needs. This format was designed by Noel Bartlo, who thought that it
would
be easier for you and for us to keep track of our day-to-day transactions
under
our agreement. (Sheet1 is just a copy of Exhibit 1, I believe.) The numbers
are final with the following exceptions which we will address with you in the
morning, since some of the issues relate to contract interpretation (ours vs.
yours) as it pertains to storage. The exceptions are noted below:
*LDCs for whom the scheduler is Novsek. (I need to verify that she included
volume requirements for Major Accounts being retained by CES thru March.)
*COH choice requirements are total daily requirements. We need to resolve how
this total will break out between flowing gas and storage withdrawals.
*AGL requirements are not included because we also need to resolve some
storage
issues there.
*In some cases, I see that the schedulers have shown a total monthly volume
requirement in lieu of a set of daily requirements. We need to discuss how
we
want to (have to?) handle these under the contract.
If nothing else, you'll be able to give us your opinion of this spreadsheet
format.
Doug Kinney
Ph: 703-561-6339
Fax: 703-561-7317
- 03 00 SUPPLY NEEDS - ALL LDCS (MASTER).xls
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490
----- Forwarded by Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2001 04:43 PM -----
Bob Bowen
06/01/2001 04:19 PM
To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Citation
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I figure buying stuff for me and making myself happy is just like making you happy :)
"Immer, Ingrid" <[email protected]> on 04/24/2001 11:07:54 AM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: RE: FW
When is that very last one going to kick in?
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 10:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FW
The truth is out there!
--
-------
Subject: FW: A Little Humor to Start Your Day
Computer Gender
An English teacher was explaining to the students
the
concept of gender
association in the English language; noting how
hurricanes at one time were
given only female names, and how ships and planes
were
usually referred to
as "she." One of the students raised her hand and
asked,
"What gender is a
computer?"
The teacher wasn't certain and divided the class
into two
groups: males
in one, females in the other, and asked them to
decide if
a computer should
be masculine or feminine. Both groups were asked
to give
four reasons for
their recommendations.
The group of women concluded that computers
should be
referred to as
masculine because:
1. In order to get their attention, you have to
turn them
on.
2. They have a lot of data but are still clueless.
3. They are supposed to help you solve your
problems, but
half the time,
they ARE the problem.
4. As soon as you commit to one, you realize that,
if you
had waited a
little longer, you could have had a better model.
The men, on the other hand, decided that
computers
should definitely be
referred to as feminine because:
1. No one but their creator understands their
internal
logic.
2. The native language they use to communicate
with other
computers is
incomprehensible to everyone else.
3. Even your smallest mistakes are stored in
long-term
memory for later
retrieval.
4. As soon as you make a commitment to one, you
find
yourself spending half
your paycheck on accessories for it.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dave
I hate to make the management committee too big but how about Scott Tholen.
He is very high quality.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Encina has some tru ups.
Meter
Vance New March
AVG.
4353
54
53
5631
40 35
5625
20 25
6832
225 276
270 TO 280
9731
325 290
300 TO 308
9720
6750 6500
6030 TO 6895
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
_________________________________________________________________
B R E A K F A S T W I T H T H E F O O L
Tuesday, November 21, 2000
[email protected]
_________________________________________________________________
REGISTER TO BECOME A FOOL -- GET FREE STUFF!
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205552
_________________________________________________________________
Sponsored By: Ameritrade
You're headed to Wall Street in style. Get 2 round-trip
tickets to Hawaii, Mexico or London when you open a cash
account with just $500. Click here for Ameritrade.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=205553
"It is human nature to think wisely and to act in an absurd
fashion." -- Anatole France
AGILENT EARNS ITS "A"
Agilent tops estimates and moves to the head of the class.
By Rick Aristotle Munarriz
If there were truth in ticker symbols, Agilent (NYSE: A) would
be holding up its "A" report card proudly. With quarterly
estimates pegged at $0.53 a share, the electronics testing
equipment maker powered up expectations with a $0.69-a-share showing.
That was a 77% surge in bottom-line growth before charges on
$3.4 billion in revenues for the September period. That's
welcome news for a company that has seen its shares fall sharply
since peaking at $162 back in March.
However, a slowdown in microchip testing equipment as well as
weakness in the wireless market has the company warning of
slower growth ahead. With a healthy backlog of orders, Agilent
still expects to meet estimates of $0.45 for the current
quarter.
Spun off by Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HWP) last year, Agilent will
be deploying new capital into areas where it sees higher growth:
communications and life sciences. I guess that gives the company
an "A" for effort too.
_________________________________________________________________
NEWS TO GO
Chipped off the old block, semiconductor distributor Avnet
(NYSE: AVT) announced that earnings for the current quarter
would come in between a nickel to a dime below the $0.85-a-share
forecast. While acknowledging the cyclical ways of the chip
industry, the company believes that earnings for the rest of the
year will remain on track.
Attention holiday shoppers, Nieman Marcus (NYSE: NMG.A) reported
stronger-than-expected profits but warned of slow action at the
registers so far this month. That's critical as the upscale
department store chain heads into the important buying season.
Nobody wants to see the Grinch steal Christmas (well, OK, it did
top the box office this past weekend, but that's another story).
EDGAR Hoovered? The Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC)
site for electronic financial filing and data retrieval will go
down on Friday for a "major upgrade." The Electronic Data
Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system -- thankfully better
known as EDGAR -- will be back up on Monday morning.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=205554
Has Ozzy Osbourne bitten off more than he can chew -- again? The
legendary showman is suing Hughes Electronics (NYSE: GMH) and
MCY.com (Nasdaq: MCYC) for broadcasting an Ozzfest 2000 concert
tour stop to Hughes' DirecTV subscribers. Osbourne claims that
tour sponsor MCY.com only had rights to a Web cast of the rock
event. Mr. Crowley will not be his legal counsel.
Deere (NYSE: DE) John? An epic Novell (Nasdaq: NOVL)? Hit the
Fluor (NYSE: FLR)? These questions and more will be answered as
the companies get set to release earnings today.
Check out yesterday's Foolish market wrap-up with just one click.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205555
_________________________________________________________________
EDITORS' PICK
Matt Richey explains the Fool's new, free My Accounts service
that drastically simplifies how you manage all of your online
accounts.
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205556
_______________________________________________________________
-News & Commentary
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205557
-Fool Community
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205558
-Post of the Day
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205559
-Latest Fribble
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205560
-Latest Market Numbers
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205561
____________________________________________________________
My Portfolio: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205562
My Discussion Boards: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205563
My Fool: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205564
Fool.com Home: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205565
My E-Mail Settings: http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205566
Sponsored By: Ameritrade
You're headed to Wall Street in style. Get 2 round-trip
tickets to Hawaii, Mexico or London when you open a cash
account with just $500. Click here for Ameritrade.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=205567
17 INDUSTRIES WORTH A LOOK
See which industries our writers think
will be hot next year with Industry Focus 2001.
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=205568
ARE YOU ENROLLED IN WIRELESS 201?
Don't miss the sequel to the best-selling
report on Soapbox.com
http://www.lnksrv.com/m.asp?i=205569
FOOL DIRECT E-MAIL SERVICES
Need to change your address or unsubscribe? You
can also temporarily suspend mail delivery. Click here:
http://www.fool.com/community/freemail/freemaillogin.asp?email=benjamin.rogers
@enron.com>
Have ideas about how we can improve the Fool Direct or new
e-mail products you'd like to see? Try our discussion board:
http://www.fool.com/m.asp?i=205570
____________________________________________________
(c) Copyright 2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This
material is for personal use only. Republication and
redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool.
.
MsgId:
msg-7420-2000-11-21_9-09-44-3298457_2_Plain_MessageAddress.msg-09:14:31(11-21-
2000)
X-Version: mailer-sender-master,v 1.84
X-Version: mailer-sender-daemon,v 1.84
Message-Recipient: [email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Thank you for your patience with us in regards to this meeting. It has now been rescheduled for tomorrow, November 29, at 1:30 to 2:00PM in ECN 5020. Please confirm your attendance with me.
Thanks!
Cindy Stark
Executive Assistant to Stan Horton
Tel: 713/853-6197
Fax: 713/345-7047
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Karen Jones (in Portland) and Sheila Tweed have been working on just the same
thing, so I'm forwarding your request to them.
Kay
From: David Leboe @ ECT 10/26/2000 04:45 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Herman Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Roger Ondreko/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Standard EPC contract
Next week, Herman and I will be working on a generic 97-10 compliant EPC
contract.
Could you forward electronic versions of 1) basic fixed price EPC contract
and 2) basic Cost Plus EPC contract.
Call me if you have any questions.
Thanks.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The newly consolidated GPG Solution Center has arrived at our new location!
We are now happy to announce that:
the new telephone number for the GPG Solution Center is
713-345-GPG5
(713-345-4745)
and our new toll-free number is
888-465-GPG5
We also have a new mailbox (GPG Solution Center). Please use this address to
request security setups and changes, Notes setups, etc. To find the id when
addressing a message, type GPG S, press ENTER, and select the id from the
resultant pick list.
You will be receiving a gift today or tomorrow that will help you remember
our new numbers. If you don't receive a reminder by Monday, August 21,
please let us know at the number above.
As a reminder, you will continue to contact us for:
Desktop, laptop and peripheral repair.
Desktop configuration and installation.
Password security administration.
Security setup and modification (rights to LAN and application access).
Answers on Microsoft Office Products.
Support of GPG-specific applications.
Assistance with Notes Mail.
Assistance with remote access (dial-up).
Anything else you're unsure of!
Important Notes:
We're trying to make these changes as transparent as possible to you! The
old help desk numbers (37307 and 35352) will automatically be transferred to
the new number.
Contact the Hottap Help Desk at 713-853-6063 for Hot Tap issues only.
Omaha and field users will continue to call their current support groups.
ET&S Marketing (Houston, Minneapolis and Omaha) will continue to contact the
Omaha Helpdesk.
If you have any questions, please call us!
GPG Solution Center
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Pls print for me--Mike, thanks for offering me a copy but I had it on the
computer after all. Thanks. df
---------------------- Forwarded by Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron on 03/20/2001
03:42 PM ---------------------------
Stanley Horton
03/20/2001 02:02 PM
Sent by: Cindy Stark
To: John R Keller/OTS/Enron@Enron, John Shafer/OTS/Enron@Enron, James
Saunders/FGT/Enron, Jerry Peters/NPNG/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron,
Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dave Neubauer/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Hayes/FGT/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Dorothy
McCoppin/FGT/Enron, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Robert
Kilmer/FGT/Enron, Dan Pribble/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Michel Nelson/ET&S/Enron,
Randy Rice/OTS/Enron, [email protected]
cc: Bill Cordes/NPNG/Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron, Steve
Hotte/Corp/Enron, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Danny
McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron,
Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron,
Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron, Rick
Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Virginia O'Neill/NPNG/Enron, Ruth Mann/ET&S/Enron,
Rita Houser/GPGFIN/Enron, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron, Amelia
Alder/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anne
Jolibois/FGT/Enron, Emily Sellers/ET&S/Enron, Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron, Ricki
Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Janice Hogan/GPGFIN/Enron, Carolyn Perry/OTS/Enron
Subject: Re: ETS HALF DAY STAFF MEETING AGENDA - MARCH 21, 2001
I apologize in advance for the short notice, but Stan has indicated that you
are certainly welcome to start attending all of his 2001 calendar year half
day staff meetings and that your attendance would be appreciated but is NOT
mandatory. Please see the below attached agenda for the details regarding
tomorrow's meeting.
Please note on your respective calendars the remaining scheduled half day
staff meetings (which all take place via video conference) as follows:
May 16 8:30AM-1:00PM
(Summer Break)
August 15 8:30AM-1:00PM
October 24 1:00PM-5:00PM
December 12 8:30AM-1:00PM
Don't hesitate to call me if you have any questions or concerns.
Thanks,
Cindy
Stanley Horton
03/13/2001 01:25 PM
Sent by: Cindy Stark
To: Bill Cordes/NPNG/Enron, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron, Steve
Hotte/Corp/Enron, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron, Phil Lowry/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Danny
McCarty/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Rockford Meyer/FGT/Enron, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron,
Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James
Prentice/GPGFIN/Enron, Gary P Smith/OTS/Enron@ENRON, Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron,
Margaret Carson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lorna Brennan/ET&S/Enron, Rick
Dietz/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc: Virginia O'Neill/NPNG/Enron, Ruth Mann/ET&S/Enron, Rita
Houser/GPGFIN/Enron, Kathy Campos/GPGFIN/Enron, Amelia Alder/OTS/Enron@ENRON,
Julie Armstrong/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Anne Jolibois/FGT/Enron, Emily
Sellers/ET&S/Enron, Martha Benner/ET&S/Enron, Ricki Winters/ET&S/Enron@Enron,
Janice Hogan/GPGFIN/Enron, Carolyn Perry/OTS/Enron
Subject: ETS HALF DAY STAFF MEETING AGENDA - MARCH 21, 2001
Please reference the attached agenda. If you have any questions or concerns,
do not hesitate to call me.
Please be sure to advise me if you are UNABLE to attend!
Thanks,
Cindy
X36197
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Team,
Attached is a very rough draft of a book to be put together describing the
potential Crescendo purchase of the Wildhorse South Gathering System. There
are still a lot of holes, and I would appreciate you adding your knowledge to
improve it.
Please call me with your suggestions.
Thanks,
Mark
x31709
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 11/28/2000 09:57 PM -----
Richard B Sanders
11/28/2000 09:56 PM
To: Cheryl Marshall/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Shanghai
I am sending you a letter from their atty. Call me to discuss.
Cheryl Marshall
11/27/2000 10:25 AM
To: Ann Elizabeth White/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Joanie H Ngo/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Shanghai
As of today, we have not received payment in full as requested in Richard
Sanders' letter dated November 16, 2000. We did receive a payment for
$3,202.61 on 11-20-2000. Richard - please let me know what we need to do
next to file suit.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Kay, please book 9:00 am to 2:00 pm with me Mike Miller & Don Miller with
Mike Childers (Entergy) (actually 10 am to 1pm not including travel time to
their shop in the Woodlands) on September 5, 2000.
Regards
Delainey
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Aruna,
I shall be available next week, except for Friday.
Vince
-----Original Message-----
From: "Aruna Inalsingh@Reval" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Aruna+20Inalsingh+40Reval+22+20+3CAruna+5FInalsingh+40Reval+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 12:30 PM
To: Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: Follow-up
Hi Vince -- I hope all is well and that you have recovered from the
flooding!
Just want to follow-up on a couple of things:
Firstly I haven't received your packet of information yet, which I'm looking
forward to reviewing.
Secondly, I just found out that a couple of our business guys may be coming
to your area. So thought it may be interesting for them to meet up with
you. Would you be interested/available?
Regards, Aruna
-----Original Message-----
From: Aruna Inalsingh@Reval
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 7:27 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Thanks for your time this morning.
I'm sorry, Vince. It's been another very hectic day.
Thanks again for your help.
Regards,
Aruna
Ms Aruna Inalsingh
VP of Marketing
Reval
100 Broadway, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10005
212-937-8358 (p)
212-937-8383 (F)
[email protected]
www.reval.com
This communication is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain
information that is privileged and/ or confidential. Recipient of this
correspondence should not construe any information furnished herein as any
legal, tax, accounting, investment or risk-management opinion,
recommendation, strategy or advice.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 2:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Thanks for your time this morning.
Aruna
No address was attached.
Vince
-----Original Message-----
From: "Aruna Inalsingh@Reval" <[email protected]>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Aruna+20Inalsingh+40Reval+22+20+3CAruna+5FInalsingh+40
[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 8:34 AM
To: Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: Thanks for your time this morning.
Hi Vince --
It was a pleasure speaking to you this morning. Please find below my
address, to which you can send the information on the energy commodities
market. I'll look forward to following up with you, once I have a
chance to
digest the information.
Regards, Aruna
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
January 26, 2001
Vince Kaminski
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street
30th Floor, Rm. 3036B
Houston, TX 77251-1188
1 713-853-3848
Dear Vince Kaminski,
This is to inform you of the release of @ENERGY 2.0. FTP download
instructions are available immediately. The download instructions are
included at the end of this email. Your CD's and manuals will be shipped to
you within 2 weeks. Please see below for more information regarding this new
release.
Please confirm that you are the correct recipient for this shipment and your
address above is correct by clicking reply and send. If any changes need to
be made, please make the changes above and reply.
**WARNING: PLEASE NOTE THAT IF YOU DID NOT RECEIVED A LICENSE KEY FOR
@ENERGY AFTER JUNE 2000, YOU WILL NEED TO CONTACT [email protected] OR CALL
510.548.6200 TO OBTAIN A NEW LICENSE KEY TO ENABLE THE NEW VERSION.**
**Swing users: @ENERGY/Swing now replaces the "SWING" product. See the
@ENERGY user manual for a discussion of the changes. Contact FEA for the
necessary license keys. You will be able to run both the new and old SWING
simultaneously.
Heres an overview of the new and changed features since version 1.6:
@ENERGY (Forward Curve)
Jump parameters are now calibrated for use in other @ENERGY functions.
Inputs and outputs to POWERCALIB and COMCALIB have changed. See the
corresponding function syntax in the User Guide for additional information.
35-40% speed improvement. The module is now out of beta.
@ENERGY (Basics)
Different interpolation schemes on forward prices are now supported. If you
use INDEXSWAP , EXOTICSWAP, or OPTINDEXSWAP with floating price linked to a
series of futures dates, such futures dates need not be close to dates
specified in the forward curve input. A new utility function, PATHUTIL,
allows you to simulate and visualize price paths consistent with the models
supported by @ENERGY. 25-30% speed improvement.
@ENERGY (Advanced)
Different interpolation schemes on forward prices are now supported. If you
use OPTDIFFSWAP or DIFFSWAP with floating price linked to a series of
futures dates, such futures dates need not be close to dates specified in
the forward curve input. CALSPREADOPT now allows for the specification of
two different mean reversion rates. 30-35% speed improvement.
@ENERGY (Swing)
SWINGOPT and STRIPSWINGOPT now allow for valuation of swing straddle
contracts with overall load constraints. 65-70% speed improvement. The
module is now out of beta.
@ENERGY (Weather)
30-35% speed improvement.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact us. We appreciate this
opportunity to be of continuing service to Enron North America Corp..
Regards,
Michelle Mendoza
[email protected]
+1-510-548-6200
Financial Engineering Associates, Inc. (FEA)
****************************************************************************
*****************************
To download @ENERGY 2.0 via FTP, follow the following instructions:
NOTE: Using EXPLORER leads to unpredictable results, so we suggest using
NETSCAPE or a DOS shell.
USING NETSCAPE:
In the Location box type: ftp://[email protected]
Password: 2rbzxgv5
energy-2.0-win32.exe is for Windows 95/98/2000/NT. Download and run on
a local drive.
USING A DOS SHELL:
At a DOS prompt type: ftp ftp.fea.com
User: energy
Password: 2rbzxgv5
Type "binary" and hit 'return'.
Type "ls" for a list of available files.
Type "get" energy-2.0-win32.exe and and wait for the ftp> prompt.
Type "quit".
The file will be downloaded into the directory at which you entered the ftp
site.
Double click on the exe and follow the instructions on the screen.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 04/23/2001
04:33 PM ---------------------------
"Btu" <[email protected]> on 04/20/2001 04:47:41 PM
To: "Btu Weekly" <>
cc:
Subject: Btu Weekly
Attached is the latest issue of Btu Weekly.
e-mail: [email protected]
phone: 732-758-8222
fax: 732-758-8286
- wg042301.pdf
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Pete,
Could you call Bill and discuss?
Thanks,
Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 04/09/2001 07:45
PM ---------------------------
Bill Williams@ECT
04/09/2001 07:19 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT, [email protected], Sheila
Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Bills/Enron@EnronXGate, Roseann
Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate
Subject: Re: LV Cogen Turbine Agreement
Kay - sorry I have taken so long to review the attachments to your e mail.
I have comments that I would like to address in a conference call with GE
(Lee Johnson), Peter Thompson of AKLLP (history of changes - especially in
the guarantees for HR and MW output).
Basically, the figures for HR and Output should remain as was struck.
(Trivial - but Lee knows what I have gone through with the EPC contractor on
HR and MW (kW) guarantees.)
Electrical Output should stay at 43,994 kW rather than change to 43,988 kW.
Same goes for the specific value, and H/R guarantee (8969 btu/kWh) and
specific value.
What is really puzzling is when I went back to a December BO contract, I had
a kW guarantee over 48 MWs each, at an 8800 + HR. This is with conditions as
set in the existing version. Where did the MWs go?
I need to understand the history of changes to the BO contract, and be sure
we are not leaving value on the table. That is why Kay, if possible _ I'd
like a quick conference call that would include the party making the changes
to HR and MW output guarantees.
Also - I did not see the addition of 4 more HMI's as needed for LVCII. The
power system stabilizers were in the scope of supply - but I could not find
additional HMI's (whatever that entails).
I believe we can knock this out by tomorrow to meet the April 10 date listed
in your e mail.
Please call me should you have any questions.
Regards
Bill W.
(503) 464-8958
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
On my way bak
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Shelley -- I'm going to the game but should be back in the office after 5 pm
today if you want to chat. x30596.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Could you please take care of my application for Enron Online
Thanks,
Larry
---------------------- Forwarded by Larry May/Corp/Enron on 03/05/2001 10:16
AM ---------------------------
From: Justin Rostant@ECT on 03/02/2001 03:25 PM
To: Larry May/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Stack Manager Training
I have reserved EB 27C2 for 2:30 pm on the Wednesday, the 7th of March. Make
sure when you put in your eRequest for the EnronOnline applications you
specify that you want access to both the "production environment" and the
"test environment"
Let me know if you have any questions
jr
3-6460
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
no. they told us yesterday was the last day and that only the eol traders would be getting lunch. i tell you that we are peons down here. not a big wig like yourself.
-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:39 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:
actually i hate it, are you guys still getting lunch up here
-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:38 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:
i take it that you don't like it?
-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:37 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:
some crap from pappadeaux
-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:37 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject: RE:
oh ya probably. i will continue to freak out myself. :) what are you eating piglet?
-----Original Message-----
From: Maggi, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:36 AM
To: Nelson, Michelle
Subject: RE:
sorry i went to get lunch, i think people are freaking out because of ken lays email this morning
-----Original Message-----
From: Nelson, Michelle
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 11:34 AM
To: Maggi, Mike
Subject:
why are you ignoring me?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
No problem Jeff. Jennifer, could you please call me at (510) 981-3215 to
reschedule? Alternatively, my cell phone number is (510) 919-0042.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Opt4 Discussion/demo
Hi Laura,
I was just called into a meeting with Ken Lay, and Greg Whalley, the CEO
and President, respectively, of Enron at 3:00 pm central time.
Unfortunately we will have to reschedule our call. I am copying my asst,
Jennifer Burns, on this, so she can facilitate our rescheduling the demo.
Thanks for understanding, and I look forward to speaking with you.
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Laura Craft <[email protected]>@ENRON
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:00 PM
To: Shankman, Jeffrey A.
Cc: Robert Verratti
Subject: Opt4 Discussion/demo
Hi Jeff. Thanks to Jenne for the introduction. Bob Verratti tells me
that
we are confirmed for a call and web-ex demo at 1:30 Pacific tomorrow,
Wednesday, November 14. I will call you at (713) 853-1761 and the demo
will
be directed to your email address. We have had extensive discussions
about
the Opt4 platform with Greg Whalley, Greg Piper, Jay Webb and a number
of
others at Enron and I look forward to having the opportunity to
demonstrate
it for you. Although the Opt4 platform can be used for many purposes,
its
unique application is in the trading of customized (OTC style)
derivatives
for any underlying market. The platform itself allows an infinite
amount of
deal customization which we have chosen to constrain through the use of
"smart templates" each of which reflects a structure recognized and
traded
on the OTC. Traders then specify all terms within the template and post
bids, offers or RFQ's to the site. All activity on the site (both
postings
and trade match) are constrained by our "pre-permissioning" system which
checks in real time the trade specific and portfolio VaR to assure head
room
limits would not be exceeded. We have spent a year building out with
BOTCC
the first ever clearing interface capable of handling this level of
trade
customization. All standard clearance and settlement services are
available
through our strategic partnership with BOTCC. The end result is a
fully
integrated solution bringing transparency and credit support to OTC
markets,
whether in emerging markets such as chemicals, weather, or steel, or in
established commodity and financial markets. Our target customers fall
into
three categories: 1) established exchanges wanting to expand into
customized trades linked to their existing product lines, 2) dealers or
market makers seeking to automate and expand their phone business, 3)
B2B's
wanting to offer risk management products to support their cash market
trading. The attached documents are quite high level but may help to get
you
oriented before our call tomorrow. They include a brief description of
the
Company, product summary, a synopsis of platform functionality and
hosting
services and a white paper on our proprietary permssioning and risk
management systems. I'll look forward to speaking with you tomorrow.
<<Trading Engine.pdf>> <<Hosting and Ops.pdf>> <<What is Opt4.pdf>>
<<Risk White Paper.pdf>>
- Trading Engine.pdf << File: Trading Engine.pdf >>
- Hosting and Ops.pdf << File: Hosting and Ops.pdf >>
- What is Opt4.pdf << File: What is Opt4.pdf >>
- Risk White Paper.pdf << File: Risk White Paper.pdf >>
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at [email protected] and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Please see the attached letter to Feinstein.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Guys, can you gather up the signed employment offers and bring them to me - I'm getting pressured to get these signed - so far, I've only got two returned to me (and one is mine).
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Angie, would you go into Unify on July 31st and change the pathed volume to
Clinton from 430 to 651 please - this should make the total volume = 13,551.
Change the supply from Phillips to balance out the transaction.
From: Donnie Myers @ ENRON 08/22/2000 01:43 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Peoples deal with Clinton
Chris,
I just finished talking with you about a deal that we sold to Clinton Energy
Management (Deal #320094). The volume that we have in our system has a
volume of 13,330 MMBtu and it should be 13,551 MMBtu @ 4.56 (We only need to
change the volume). Could you please change this as soon as possible so that
I can get a corrected invoice to them? Let me know if you have any
questions. Thanks...
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Don't forget that Global Finance is supposed to review these. They have the
turbine contract.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hi everyone!!
I made it and my bags finally showed up... almost had to do a shopping trip.
My apartment is right across from the office and is very nice. Maryland is
beautiful and the weather is great... nice and cool... in the 60/70's! I
need my sweaters already.... who would have thought.
TCO (the pipeline I scheduled) is taking us to the Orioles game Friday.
Please note my e-mail has changed slightly... I know... I said it wouldn't.
Gen changed to neg. Neg is for National Energy Group. It was gen for US
Generating.
[email protected]
My Phone numbers:
301-280-6177 work
301-654-0508 home (still need to change my voicemail)
My address:
The Metropolitan
7620 Old Georgetown Road
Unit #214
Bethesda, MD 20814
Looking forward to hearing from y'all and your visits!!!
PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility. Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission. Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I have further placed the Core / Non-core pricing (Core & non-core tab) per
the CPUC's March 01 calculation. I also began building an analysis of the
core cost under a scenario where we attempt to examine the cost in the
utility. At this point, the following are not modeled or need refinement:
1. The load figures for PGE are suspect in the MOU.
2. T&D is not split by class. Total CPUC revenue was used and I subtracted
the total gen portion ($'s) derived from the MOU. This was apportioned pro
rata across load. The residential customer should have higher T&D per unit
consumed. Perhaps Robert has some figures and can also validate the
reasonableness of this total dollar plug figure.
3. No value or loss was ascribed to the utility's open short or long position
4. No allocation of the value or loss on future DWR contracts was made.
Based on the DWR forward price path they would have positive MTM value
(remember their contracted price is below their projected spot price path).
Using our or Henwood's curves these would be way out of the money in 02/03.
I am unfortunately out an this seminar I have to go to on Monday and
Tuesday. This is bad timing.
Jeff S. and Kortney can you further read the ancillary MOU materials and see
if we can refine some of the assumptions? This is a priority task. Also
please check the mathematical integrity of our figures. Also Robert, has
there been any revised rate filings indicating different pricing for each of
the categories in Loretta Lynch's March 01 attachment that we used to
populate the spreadsheet?
Regards,
Michael
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hi guys,
This is an article that ran yesterday in the L.A. Times, and I believe on
Sunday in the New York Times by Rod Smith on Chardonnay. D-G gets a nice
mention so I thought I'd try to pass it along.
Let me know if this comes through since it's the first time I've attempted
to forward an aritcle.
Dan
-------------------
Chardonnay Breaks the Butterscotch Barrier
--------------------
Rod Smith
February 27 2002
I used to be a staunch ABC man. "Anything But Chardonnay" (and Cabernet) was
my motto. I was simply bored with the sameness of the oak-flavored grape
syrups so many California vintners were producing from the state's two
predominant varieties.
The complete article can be viewed at:
http://www.latimes.com/la-000014782feb27.column
Visit Latimes.com at http://www.latimes.com
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Please arrange - hopefully for Tuesday since Wed. may be hectic.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT on 10/19/99 10:53 AM
---------------------------
Nicola Beales
10/19/99 10:35 AM
To: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey
T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Corbally/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lynda
Clemmons/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ted Murphy/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Jenny Helton/HOU/ECT@ect, Taffy Milligan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Carol
Kincannon/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject:
Paul Simons will be attending the legal conference in Houston on 28th/29th
October. Paul has asked if it would be possible to have some time with you
during his visit. Would it be possible to meet sometime on Tuesday 26th or
Wednesday 27th October? I would be grateful if you could let me know when
would be convenient (assuming you are in the office on those dates).
FYI, I have already booked meetings as mentioned below:
Tuesday 26th October @ 2.00 p.m.
Wednesday 27th October @ 4.00 p.m.
Thank you.
Regards,
Nicola
Tel: 44 171 970 7279
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I will be in Dallas from Tuesday, August 29 through Thursday, August 31 at an
offsite session hosted by Rick Causey to review the SAP implementation and
next steps. The linkage of Unify and our Global Databases to SAP is a
critical one, and decisions around next steps can impact these operating
systems and our processes. Therefore, Rick has asked that I attend. Patti
Thompson, my assistant (x39106), has telephone numbers where I can be reached
if needed. In my absence, please contact the following persons in Houston
with questions. Peggy Hedstrom is the appropriate contact in Calgary.
Natural Gas Operations Steve Jackson x37070
Power Operations Stacey White x31870
DPR Mike Moscoso x35242
MPR David Maxwell x36983
I will be back in the office on Friday, September 1.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I am in need of several more contract copies. Could you please forward me
contract:
96037261
96049419
96001003
96045391
Also, you had mentioned earlier that GISB contracts should not have been used
on some of the contracts I earlier received. Are the appropriate contracts
going to be sent out, or are we stuck with the ones in place.
Call with questions. 3-7151
Sincerely
Tom Donohoe
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I don't know what list you are working from for your approval of credit
derivatives, but attached is the list EOL sent me. Many of the
counterparties on the list are London based credit counterparties, and I will
not be reviewing those, but I thought you might want to take a look at this
to see if it's jiving with what you're looking at. When I'm done (probably
some time at end of the day since I just got the list yesterday and it's due
today!), I will be emailing my approvals to Mark Dilworth in London.
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2000 10:02 AM
---------------------------
Frank L Davis
03/06/2000 03:56 PM
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Revised counterparty list
Tana,
Attached is the new list with "country" added for each counterparty.
Frank
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Greg Whalley will be in attendance at both meetings.
Liz
Enron North America Corp.
From: Sherri Reinartz @ ENRON 01/12/2000 03:30 PM
To: James M Bannantine/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Cliff
Baxter/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sanjay Bhatnagar/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Rick Buy/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Causey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Diomedes
Christodoulou/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James V Derrick@Enron,
Andrew S Fastow/HOU/ECT@ECT, Peggy Fowler/Enron@Gateway, Mark
Frevert/LON/ECT@ECT, Kevin P Hannon/HOU/ECT@ECT, Ken Harrison/Enron@Gateway,
David Haug/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Joe Hirko/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Stanley Horton/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kurt S
Huneke/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Larry L
Izzo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Mark
Koenig/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Kenneth Lay/Corp/Enron@Enron, Rebecca P
Mark/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Mike McConnell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Rebecca
McDonald/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey McMahon/HOU/ECT@ECT, J
Mark Metts/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cindy Olson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Lou L Pai/HOU/EES@EES,
Kenneth D Rice/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey Sherrick/Corp/Enron@Enron, John
Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT, Jeff Skilling/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joseph W
Sutton/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT@ECT, Thomas
E White/HOU/EES@EES, Brenda
Garza-Castillo/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Marcia
Manarin/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Susan Skarness/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Stacy Guidroz/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Beena
Pradhan/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Karen K Heathman/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Sharron Westbrook/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Molly
Bobrow/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Rosane
Fabozzi/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Stephanie
Harris/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Bridget Maronge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Shelby
Earle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Shelby Earle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary
Trosper/Enron@Gateway, Nicki Daw/LON/ECT@ECT, Carol Ann Brown/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Dolly Henrici/Enron@Gateway, Ann Joyner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Elaine
Rodriguez/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Nancy Young/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Ann Joyner/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Cindy
Stark/Corp/Enron@Enron, Sherryl Stone/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT,
Mary E Garza/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Maureen
McVicker/HOU/EES@EES, Joannie Williamson/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rosalee
Fleming/Corp/Enron@Enron, Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marsha
Lindsey/HOU/AZURIX@AZURIX, Cathy Phillips/HOU/ECT@ECT, Loretta
Brelsford/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Sue Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dolores
Fisher/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Owens/HOU/EES@EES, Dorothy B Dalton/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Christina Grow/Corp/Enron@Enron, Lauren Urquhart/LON/ECT@ECT, Sherri
Reinartz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Katherine Brown/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Pam
Benson/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Liz M Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy G
Smith@EES, Bobbie Power/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Joe Witherspoon/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rodney Keys/Corp/Enron@ENRON, DeMonica
Lipscomb/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Vanessa Groscrand/Corp/Enron@Enron, Suzanne
Danz/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Keith Dziadek/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETINGS - MONDAY, JANUARY 17
Please respond regarding your attendance at the following events:
Executive Committee Breakfast
Date: Monday, January 17
Time: 7:30 a.m.
Location: EB50M
Please indicate below whether or not you will attend the breakfast.
Yes, I will attend __X__
No, I will not attend _____
* * *
Executive Committee Weekly Meeting
Date: Monday, January 17
Time: 11:00 a.m. (CDT)
Location: 50th Floor Boardroom
Video: Connections will be established with remote locations upon request.
Conf call: A conference call bridge has been reserved. The dial in number
713/853-3233.
Please contact Sherri Sera (713/853-5984) or Katherine Brown (713/345-7774)
for the weekly passcode.
Please indicate below whether or not you plan to attend this meeting and
through what medium.
Yes, I will attend in person ____X___
By video conference from _______
By conference call _______
No, I will not attend _______
* * *
Please return this e-mail to me with your response by 12:00 p.m., Friday,
January 14.
Thank you,
Sherri
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Start Date: 1/4/02; HourAhead hour: 8; No ancillary schedules awarded. No variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010408.txt
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I can' t thank you enough for organizing my business cards. I know it's a
pain and I really appreciate it. Thank you so much. Also, I've got an entry
in my bank account (EDI payment) for abou $5700. Do you have the paper for
that? Do I have any other expense thing-ees coming?
Thanks,
Jeff
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
When would you like to get together to go through the comments to the specs?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS
Weather Group
On Wednesday, December 6th, The Weather Channel aired an episode of their
show "Atmospheres," which included a fifteen minute segment focusing on
Enron's Weather Risk Management business. Mark Tawney, Steven Vu, Gary
Taylor, and Steve Bennett were featured. The Weather Channel has aired the
episode periodically since then. The parts that make it through the Enron
cutting room floor will be coming soon to an elevator near you! If you would
like to view a copy of the episode in its entirety, please contact Yvette
Simpson at ext. 3-9595.
The Weather Risk Management group completed the first ever Power Demand
transaction this week. The transaction was a swap based on the PJM demand
index. Power Demand contracts use average peak power demand as an index and
allow power market participants (generators, btu distributors, marketers,
etc...) to mitigate volumetric exposures. Weekly swaps are available on
EnronOnline and the desk has placed option contracts on this index in the
broker market. Inquiries regarding this product should be directed to
Claudio Ribeiro, product manager ext. 3-7313, Gary Taylor ext. 3-1511, or
Valter Stoiani ext. 3-6906.
West Power Trading
It,s been a wild and crazy holiday season in the West. Electricity prices
have remained extremely bullish throughout the entire WSCC, due in large part
to below-normal temperatures, &less than stellar8 river flows in the
Northwest and Northern California, tremendously volatile natural gas prices,
and a number of generating plants down for both planned and unplanned
maintenance. Recently, the Federal Regulatory Energy Commission (FERC) has
stepped in to implement several orders in an effort to try to correct this
&extremely flawed market.8 Stay tuned sports fans; some have the feeling
that the best is yet to come.
HAPPY HOLIDAYS
Seasons Greetings from ENA PR. The EnTouch newsletter will be on holiday
break next week. If you have information for future issues of EnTouch,
please send it to Michelle Vitrella. We hope you have a wonderful and safe
holiday. See you next year!
WELCOME
New Hires ENA/EIM/EGM
ENA ) Kimberly Hardy, Adam Johnson, Daniel Lisk, William Fleenor, Stacey
Wales, Jason Fischer, Aparna Rajaram
LEGAL STUFF
The information contained in this newsletter is confidential and proprietary
to Enron Corp. and its subsidiaries. It is intended for internal use only
and should not be disclosed.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
No credit support annex. Enron Corp. guaranty capped at $25 million. That's
the latest (for Lehman, etc.)
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 05/31/2000 12:42 PM -----
Rod Nelson
05/31/2000 09:54 AM
To: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: ENA as cp
Let's use ENA as the Enron entity on all of these new contracts.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
My apologies. Thank you very much.
Best,
Jeff
Diane Dimeff <[email protected]>
11/13/2000 12:14 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Registering for Classes
HI Jeff,
Actually, you were supposed to sign up by friday, but I'll get you on the
list now.
Cheers,
Diane
At 10:12 AM 11/10/2000 -0600, you wrote:
>
>Greetings Diane:
>
>Well, the TeleBears on the Web seems to be experiencing some "technical
>difficulties" and I've thus far been unable to register. I'll keep trying!
>
>In the meantime, I want to make sure that I don't miss any deadlines for
>the 1-unit courses. I intend to sign up for the E291-B course (Speaking
>for Management). When do I need to sign up by? Thanks.
>
>Best,
>Jeff
>
>
>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Did you see these pictures?
- Allison_Houston_devastation.pps
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Can send you me a copy of the 2000 plan for the East Desk?
Paula Harris
10/03/2000 03:57 PM
To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott Neal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fred
Lagrasta/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip K Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris
Gaskill/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: 2001 Margin Plan
As you are already aware, Suzanne Nichole has moved on and I am the new team
reporting accountant for Gas Trading. I am in the process of working on your
plans for 2001. Dealiney and Lavarato communicated that 2001 margin plans
are to be initiated by each team and the minimum increase expected is 20%
over each of your 2000 plans. Please send me your margin expectations so
that I can update the templates and forward you revised copies which will
include your direct expense plan dollars.
Given that the deadline for turning this information in to the Office of the
Chair is approaching soon, please send me your estimates as soon as you can.
Thanks, Paula.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/03/2000 11:18 AM -----
EIS Billing
11/03/2000 10:42 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: SEPTEMBER 2000 EIS BILLING / s100105.xls
PLEASE E-MAIL ALL BILLING ISSUES TO "[email protected]" OR TO THE
SPECIFIC SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM(S) AS DETAILED BELOW: Year 2000 changes:
Phone charges: Phones are being charged to the person's company and cost
center where possible, otherwise to the rent location. The description will
start with People\ or Room\ unless it was entered manually at the source.
Data connections: One connection is being charged for each room instead of
one connection for each port in a room.
Attached are spreadsheets with the detail supporting the expenses for all
the various services provided by Enron Information Services.
EIS billings for items attached to the room, such as phones and data ports,
and people specific services for contractors, such as LAN ID's and AT&T
calling cards, are billed to the same company and cost center as room rent in
EB, 2AC, 3AC, or JF. For Omaha, EIS uses a phone database maintained by
Tammy Anderson for this purpose.
People-specific services are billed to the company and cost center
corresponding to the employee's SAP company and department. Video conference
usage, data circuits, Ardmore usage, EDI, and web site billings are based on
a company and cost center furnished by the resource using the service.
EIS bills services on a one month lag. We take a snapshot of the Corporate
Administrative Services rent file for each room in EB and 3AC, of the Omaha
phone database for each room in Omaha, and of the SAP company and cost center
for each employee. This snapshot is taken about the 21st of each month for
use as a source for billing information.
Please examine these billings for accuracy. If the billings are incorrect,
generally speaking either the rent should be corrected by contacting
Corporate Administrative Services or the person should be moved to the
correct SAP department by contacting the HR representative. If the room
number is incorrect on the phone or long distance billings, this may be
corrected by sending the room number along with the telephone number to Notes
Mail ID "Move-Team".
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/03/2000 11:18 AM -----
EIS Billing
11/03/2000 10:42 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: SEPTEMBER 2000 EIS BILLING / s100061.xls
PLEASE E-MAIL ALL BILLING ISSUES TO "[email protected]" OR TO THE
SPECIFIC SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM(S) AS DETAILED BELOW: Year 2000 changes:
Phone charges: Phones are being charged to the person's company and cost
center where possible, otherwise to the rent location. The description will
start with People\ or Room\ unless it was entered manually at the source.
Data connections: One connection is being charged for each room instead of
one connection for each port in a room.
Attached are spreadsheets with the detail supporting the expenses for all
the various services provided by Enron Information Services.
EIS billings for items attached to the room, such as phones and data ports,
and people specific services for contractors, such as LAN ID's and AT&T
calling cards, are billed to the same company and cost center as room rent in
EB, 2AC, 3AC, or JF. For Omaha, EIS uses a phone database maintained by
Tammy Anderson for this purpose.
People-specific services are billed to the company and cost center
corresponding to the employee's SAP company and department. Video conference
usage, data circuits, Ardmore usage, EDI, and web site billings are based on
a company and cost center furnished by the resource using the service.
EIS bills services on a one month lag. We take a snapshot of the Corporate
Administrative Services rent file for each room in EB and 3AC, of the Omaha
phone database for each room in Omaha, and of the SAP company and cost center
for each employee. This snapshot is taken about the 21st of each month for
use as a source for billing information.
Please examine these billings for accuracy. If the billings are incorrect,
generally speaking either the rent should be corrected by contacting
Corporate Administrative Services or the person should be moved to the
correct SAP department by contacting the HR representative. If the room
number is incorrect on the phone or long distance billings, this may be
corrected by sending the room number along with the telephone number to Notes
Mail ID "Move-Team".
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/03/2000 11:18 AM -----
EIS Billing
11/03/2000 11:03 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: OCTOBER 2000 EIS BILLING / s100105.xls
PLEASE E-MAIL ALL BILLING ISSUES TO "[email protected]" OR TO THE
SPECIFIC SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM(S) AS DETAILED BELOW: Year 2000 changes:
Phone charges: Phones are being charged to the person's company and cost
center where possible, otherwise to the rent location. The description will
start with People\ or Room\ unless it was entered manually at the source.
Data connections: One connection is being charged for each room instead of
one connection for each port in a room.
Attached are spreadsheets with the detail supporting the expenses for all
the various services provided by Enron Information Services.
EIS billings for items attached to the room, such as phones and data ports,
and people specific services for contractors, such as LAN ID's and AT&T
calling cards, are billed to the same company and cost center as room rent in
EB, 2AC, 3AC, or JF. For Omaha, EIS uses a phone database maintained by
Tammy Anderson for this purpose.
People-specific services are billed to the company and cost center
corresponding to the employee's SAP company and department. Video conference
usage, data circuits, Ardmore usage, EDI, and web site billings are based on
a company and cost center furnished by the resource using the service.
EIS bills services on a one month lag. We take a snapshot of the Corporate
Administrative Services rent file for each room in EB and 3AC, of the Omaha
phone database for each room in Omaha, and of the SAP company and cost center
for each employee. This snapshot is taken about the 21st of each month for
use as a source for billing information.
Please examine these billings for accuracy. If the billings are incorrect,
generally speaking either the rent should be corrected by contacting
Corporate Administrative Services or the person should be moved to the
correct SAP department by contacting the HR representative. If the room
number is incorrect on the phone or long distance billings, this may be
corrected by sending the room number along with the telephone number to Notes
Mail ID "Move-Team".
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/03/2000 11:18 AM -----
EIS Billing
11/03/2000 11:03 AM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: OCTOBER 2000 EIS BILLING / s100061.xls
PLEASE E-MAIL ALL BILLING ISSUES TO "[email protected]" OR TO THE
SPECIFIC SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM(S) AS DETAILED BELOW: Year 2000 changes:
Phone charges: Phones are being charged to the person's company and cost
center where possible, otherwise to the rent location. The description will
start with People\ or Room\ unless it was entered manually at the source.
Data connections: One connection is being charged for each room instead of
one connection for each port in a room.
Attached are spreadsheets with the detail supporting the expenses for all
the various services provided by Enron Information Services.
EIS billings for items attached to the room, such as phones and data ports,
and people specific services for contractors, such as LAN ID's and AT&T
calling cards, are billed to the same company and cost center as room rent in
EB, 2AC, 3AC, or JF. For Omaha, EIS uses a phone database maintained by
Tammy Anderson for this purpose.
People-specific services are billed to the company and cost center
corresponding to the employee's SAP company and department. Video conference
usage, data circuits, Ardmore usage, EDI, and web site billings are based on
a company and cost center furnished by the resource using the service.
EIS bills services on a one month lag. We take a snapshot of the Corporate
Administrative Services rent file for each room in EB and 3AC, of the Omaha
phone database for each room in Omaha, and of the SAP company and cost center
for each employee. This snapshot is taken about the 21st of each month for
use as a source for billing information.
Please examine these billings for accuracy. If the billings are incorrect,
generally speaking either the rent should be corrected by contacting
Corporate Administrative Services or the person should be moved to the
correct SAP department by contacting the HR representative. If the room
number is incorrect on the phone or long distance billings, this may be
corrected by sending the room number along with the telephone number to Notes
Mail ID "Move-Team".
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
A reminder of today's presentations (even if you didn't sign-up,
please come if interested):
Digitas - 12:30PM, Howard Lounge of the Faculty Club
Nortel Networks - 6:00PM, Great Hall of the Faculty Club
Rich
************************************************************************
A word from Digitas:
DIGITAS - Leading Internet Consulting Company at Berkeley Oct.23rd!
Take A New Direction
You've survived the routine, the classes, and lectures. Now it's time
for a new direction and to do stuff nobody's ever tried before. At
Digitas, not only will your colleagues get your ideas, but they'll also
get your jokes. Even your parents have heard of our clients. Our unique
ebusiness model integrates technology, marketing, creative and strategy
for the world's top companies. You will be challenged with new
technologies - and inspired by people who are trailblazing, genuine and
accountable. So take a new direction that is passionate and
intelligent. Visit Digitas' Information Session on Monday,
October 23, 2000 at 12:30 p.m. at the Faculty Club to learn more about
the company that was ranked #2 among eCommerce integrators by The
Forrester Report and #1 among interactive agencies by Advertising Age.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.