text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
-----Original Message-----
From: "Fuller, Holly" <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Fuller+2C+20Holly+22+20+3CHolly+2EFuller+40ElPaso+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 3:29 PM
To: Benson, Robert
Subject: RE: What up ?
Hey Rob, sorry if I sounded a little weird on the phone the other night. My
boyfriend and I were in the middle of a really heavy discussion when you
called. He was standing right by me, (upset with me), so it was a little
awkward. It was great to hear from you and I'd still like to meet you for a
drink sometime after work. Take care, Holly
[Benson, Robert] Hey Holly, sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you, I went back to Calgary for 10 days. Finally toke a vacation, I'm glad you wrote back, I shouldn't have called on a Friday night. I hope every thing worked out with your boyfriend. I'd love to get out with you, how's next wed or thurs ? Talk to ya later, Rob
******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso
Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the
sender.
******************************************************************
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Notice No. 00-338
October 3, 2000
MEMORANDUM
TO: ALL NYMEX AND COMEX MEMBERS
FROM: Neal L. Wolkoff, Executive Vice President
DATE: October 3, 2000
RE: Notice of CFTC Approval of New NYMEX Rule 6.40C: ("Average Price
Calculations by Futures Commission Merchants")
Please be advised that the CFTC has approved new NYMEX Rule 6.40C ("Average
Price Calculations by Futures Commission Merchants"), which is attached and
is now in effect.
New NYMEX Rule 6.40C, which is consistent with a recent CFTC "Advisory,"
permits FCMs, under certain conditions specified in the rule, to use their
own internal, proprietary systems to generate average price ("AP")
calculations when multiple prices are received on an order or series of
orders. AP calculations are not being provided by the Exchange for NYMEX
Division contracts.
New NYMEX Rule 6.40C is applicable only to NYMEX Division contracts. A
similar proposal for COMEX Division contracts remains pending with the CFTC.
The conditions specified in NYMEX Rule 6.40C include the following:
1. The customer has requested average price reporting;
2. Each individual trade is submitted to and cleared by the Exchange at the
executed price;
3. The FCM calculates and confirms to its customers a weighted mathematical
average price;
4. The FCM possesses the records to support the calculations and the
allocations to customer accounts and maintains all such records pursuant to
CFTC regulations and further makes such records available for inspection by
affected customers upon request; and
5. The FCM identifies each trade to which an average price is assigned as
having an average price on each confirmation statement and monthly statement
on which the trade is reported to the customer.
If you have any questions, please contact Tom LaSala, Vice President,
Compliance Department, at (212) 299-2897, or Brian Regan, Senior Associate
General Counsel, at (212) 299-2207.
Approved New NYMEX Rule 6.40C
("Average Price Calculations by Futures Commission Merchants")
(Entire rule is new.)
Rule 6.40C Average Price Calculations by Futures Commission Merchants
(A) Eligible Accounts. An FCM, subject to compliance with the conditions
specified in this rule, may report and/or confirm to customers an average of
multiple execution prices and may use its own proprietary system to make such
average price calculations, regardless of whether the Exchange also provides
a service for average price calculations for the applicable NYMEX Division
contract, provided:
(a) that such prices were obtained as the result of the execution of an order
or series of orders to purchase or sell the same futures and/or the same
option series for the same account or group of accounts; or
(b) that such prices were obtained as the result of the execution of trades
to purchase or sell the same futures and/or the same option series for the
FCM's proprietary account(s), provided further however, that trades for such
a proprietary account are not averaged with trades for any other account.
For purposes of this rule, eligible accounts may include multiple accounts
that are part of a managed account program or other common investment
program. Eligible accounts may include individual non-discretionary
accounts, except that prices for non-discretionary accounts may not be
averaged with prices for other non-discretionary accounts. Eligible accounts
also may include individual discretionary accounts consistent with the
provisions of Exchange Rule 6.41.
(B) An FCM may use its own system to calculate average prices for contracts
executed on the Exchange provided that the following conditions are met for
all such transactions:
1. The customer has requested average price reporting;
2. Each individual trade is submitted to and cleared by the Exchange at the
executed price;
3. The FCM calculates and confirms to its customers a weighted mathematical
average price, as calculated pursuant to the requirements of Section (C)
below;
4. The FCM possesses the records to support the calculations and the
allocations to customer accounts and maintains all such records pursuant to
CFTC regulations and further makes such records available for inspection by
affected customers upon request; and
5. The FCM identifies each trade to which an average price is assigned as
having an average price on each confirmation statement and monthly statement
on which the trade is reported to the customer.
(C) Calculation of Average Price. The weighted mathematical average price
shall be computed by FCMs by:
(a) multiplying the number of contracts purchased or sold at each execution
price by that price;
(b) adding the results together; and
(c) dividing by the total number of contracts.
For a series of orders, the average price may be computed based on the
average price of each order in that series.
FCMs may confirm to customers either the actual average price or the average
price rounded to the next price increment, provided however, that in
confirming the average price rounded to the next price increment, the FCM
must round the average price up to the next price increment for a buy order
or down to the next price increment for a sell order, and must pay any
residual thus created to the customer, except that any residual amount of
less than one cent may be retained by the FCM.
__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.
"http://208.206.41.61/email/[email protected]&
refdoc=(00-338)"
Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
-----Original Message-----
From: Symms, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 1:44 PM
To: Black, Tamara Jae
Subject: Web site down
TJ,
can you let everyone know that the webserver will be down tonight from 7pm until around 8:30pm. This is for a server move requested by the server team
Thanks
Mark Symms
Intranet Team Lead
Sr. Specialist - East Power
713-853-3105
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I have just asked the CPUC for time to speak on Edison's behalf. I am
still drafting our response (just got permission/instructions from my
management) We intend to support the settlement, but suggest that, in light
of the delays which have occurred in implementation, and the drastic
changes which have occurred in California's energy markets, and the
infrastructure proceeding that is on-going, in particular, how much
additional take-away capacity is required to support the proposed
interstate pipeline expansions, it may be appropriate to renegotiate some
of the details of the settlement and/or for the Commission to take
additional testimony/evidence.
--
Michael S. Alexander
Southern California Edison
Energy Supply and Management (ES&M)
626-302-2029
626-302-3254 (fax)
Jeff.Dasovich
@enron.com To: Tom Beach <[email protected]>
cc: [email protected], [email protected],
05/15/2001 [email protected], [email protected],
08:51 AM [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: Commission OII Hearings
Enron will very vigorously support the CS and I would hope that we could
get as many people as possible to do the same. Let's face it, California's
gas industry is a mess for the same reasons the electricity industry is a
mess (despite, and perhaps contrary to, the substantially more narrow
reasoning offered by the Brattle Group). The CS is a well-thought-out,
well-designed program for moving forward; unlike the "interim," which takes
two steps back. Can we split up the names of all the people who signed on
and call them and try to get them to show up in support?
Best,
Jeff
Tom Beach
<tomb@crossbordere To:
[email protected],
nergy.com> [email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
05/14/2001 11:37
[email protected],
PM [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Commission
OII Hearings
Watson has asked for time to speak. I'm planning to continue to support
the
CS. It brings some greater stability and certainty to SoCalGas' noncore
rates. The allocation of backbone capacity might improve shippers'
certainty of being able to move gas through Topock and Wheeler Ridge. In
the short term, it's hard to say how much that might help prices, but I
doubt that it would make them worse. In the longer term, if new generation
on the PG&E and Kern / Mojave systems, plus the North Baja and Questar
lines, actually reduce SoCalGas' throughput, then a SoCalGas city-gate
market might be pretty competitive. Finally, the CS removes SoCalGas'
favorite argument in favor of the peaking rate.
So what are Edison and Enron going to do?
Tom
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 7:26 PM
Subject: Commission OII Hearings
> I was just wondering what any of you guys are thinking about doing at the
> Gas OII meeting next Tuesday. Are any of you planning on making a
> presentation? If so, do you intend to support the settlement as filed,
or
> are there modifications you think are appropriate given the way SoCalGas
> has handled its system in the past few months?
>
> Michael
>
> P.S. FYI, I am out of town, so I am not available by phone until Monday.
>
> --
> Michael S. Alexander
> Southern California Edison
> Energy Supply and Management (ES&M)
> 626-302-2029
> 626-302-3254 (fax)
>
>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Here is the clean and red-lined version of section 1.
Ben
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
When: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 4:00 PM-5:00 PM (GMT-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada).
Where: 3567
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
As you may know, we are trying to schedule an interview for Alex Tartakovski
in Houston this week. I am copying everyone involved because i wont be able
to coordinate this tomorrow. we just brought our new daughter home today and
my wife is yelling at me to get out of my office.
I just found out that Thursday & Friday are bad days for him, so Wednesday is
the only day to do it this week. he would come down tuesday night and fly
out wednesday evening. it's probably easiest for him to arrange his flight,
but he will need a hotel and transportation from the airport. i gave him
donna's phone number for help. i assume the hyatt would be best. his home
number is 215-702-3705 and during the day his cellular is 267-981-5425.
by way of background, i plan to bring in 3 people from outside the company to
fill in some of the "vacants" in my group's org chart. the 3 areas of
specialization that are needed to execute the business plan are (1)
coordination of origination, (2) deal pricing and underwriting, and (3)
modeling and portfolio management. alex is the perfect person for #3. he
has the deepest knowledge of probability of anyone i know and is efficient at
building analysis models, which will be a big job in this business because
portfolio management needs to be redefined in real time due to the lumpiness
of insurance contracts and the lack of any historical methods for evaluating
these risks. development of pricing models will be a joint effort between
"my" group and the research dept because this will need to draw on the
expertise in research as well as being a realtime activity as new deals are
being structured. i want to encourage joint work between vasant / amitava
and alex because his background and expertise is compatible with research.
over the past 2 years, alex and i spent a lot of time developing new
electricity spot pricing methodology and this is one area where he excels. i
would expect that he would be a valuable resource in research as well, and so
i would like for him to be able to meet with vince is possible. (this could
possibly be done when vince is in philadelphia next week if there is time -
(?)) depending on what work needs to be done in the future, i could see him
working both on pricing research and this specific business unit.
i have attached alex's resume. i assume he would be manager level, but i'm
not sure of this.
this doesnt necessarily come across in the resume, but the skills that are
useful to us are:
probability / statistical model development
development of theoretical pricing methodology
excellent computer programming skills
database development and data analysis
he has the best understanding of the NERC reliability data format outside of
Mike Curley, the NERC data manager.
designed and wrote the code for the pricing model used by Ace Power Products
for deal pricing and porfolio mgmt.
excellent understanding of options pricing methodology and its application to
hedging insurance portfolios.
if you want to get into superconductor trading, he can design the standards.
can beat me at Atari Battlezone (as well as being able to navigate a real
tank through a minefield).
one objective of this meeting in houston is to make him feel comfortable with
the organization (with which you did such a good job for me) and to give him
confidence that he will be able to do state-of-the-art pricing research in
the most innovative company in the world. he is also interviewing for a job
in morgan stanley's equity dept.
we will also arrange a meeting with Per in NY, but i would like to be in the
office for that, so we can do that next week.
please call me @610-996-2522 if there are any questions. i may not pick up
but i will reply to voicemail promptly. i'm up 24 hours this week anyway.
thanks,
-- Dave
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hi -
please complete time sheets by Noon Wed. 11/15.
Thanks everyone !
Remember covered dish tomorrow too!
S.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hi Kate, what's the status of this deal?
Kate Symes @ ECT 03/12/2001 10:57 AM
To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Missing deal?
this deal is contingent on credit - he'll let me know later today whether or
not it's a good trade.
thanks,
Kate
Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/12/2001 09:00 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Missing deal?
sorry Friday, 3/9
Kate Symes @ ECT 03/12/2001 10:52 AM
To: Evelyn Metoyer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Missing deal?
what was the trade date on this?
Evelyn Metoyer@ENRON
03/12/2001 08:58 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Missing deal?
Prebon sent over a confirm for a deal where:
Enron (Mike Swerzbin) buys from PPL Montana Cal'04-Cal'06 25 mw of Mid-C at
$45.00 off-peak hours.
They did not tell me about this deal during checkout. Can you please check
with Mike.
Thanks!!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Jennifer Rudolph/HOU/EES on 06/01/2001
04:21 PM ---------------------------
Susan J Mara@ENRON
06/01/2001 03:15 PM
http://www.latimes.com/news/state/20010601/t000045783.html
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I guess my new address is [email protected]
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/24/2000 07:29
AM ---------------------------
From: ECT Notes Admin on 03/24/2000 01:07 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: @ect.enron.com email notification!
We are one @enron.com!
Please be aware of the following senders were automatically notified to (a).
stop sending internet mail to your @ect.enron.com address and to (b). send
future internet communications to [email protected] :
[email protected], [email protected]
REMINDER :
Your @ect.enron.com address should not be used any longer and will be
deactivated soon. So please make sure these contacts switch to your new
@enron.com address. If you have subscribed to mailing lists, please make
sure to update your addresses there as well.
AND
Your [email protected] address (i.e. [email protected]) will continue to
work, even though your formal address is [email protected] (i.e.
[email protected])
Please do not reply to this message as it was automatically generated.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
have you taken any finance courses yet? what's good?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached is the credit worksheet for the above-referenced Counterparty.
Samantha M. Boyd
Sr. Legal Specialist
Enron North America, Corp.
1400 Smith, EB3802A
Houston, TX 77002
Phone: (713) 853-9188
Fax: (713) 646-3490
email: [email protected]
----- Forwarded by Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron on 08/22/2000 03:33 PM -----
Nidia Mendoza@ECT
08/21/2000 03:28 PM
To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Voest-Alpine Intertrading U.S.A. Inc.
Here is a revised ISDA worksheet.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Nidia
x3-4868
---------------------- Forwarded by Nidia Mendoza/HOU/ECT on 08/21/2000 03:27
PM ---------------------------
From: Nidia Mendoza
08/21/2000 03:00 PM
To: Susan Bailey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samantha Boyd/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary Tudon/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Voest-Alpine Intertrading U.S.A. Inc.
Attached is a ISDA worksheet for Voest-Alpine Intertrading U.S.A. Inc.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Nidia
x3-4868
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I sure wish you would send me the excel worksheet for this. I'm such a lazy
butt.
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Ogy
He requested 7000 for today, but then his shedule only addsa up to about a
6425 burn???
Looks like they will still be a little long by end of run.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Start Date: 3/6/01; HourAhead hour: 9; No ancillary schedules awarded. No
variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001030609.txt
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
A copy of the final, filed answer by PGE/Sierra in response to the protests
filed in the FERC merger proceeding is attached. Please let me know if you
have any questions or comments, or if you have trouble accessing the document.
Sarah
---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron on 05/25/2000
09:19 AM ---------------------------
"Matthew Estes" <[email protected]> on 05/25/2000 07:57:51 AM
- 287821_3.wpd
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Sorry - I guess I forgot to attach what I have. Here it is.
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams III, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 12:33 PM
To: Symes, Kate
Subject: RE: Weather Database - PLEASE READ
Kate,
I would be glad to look at anything you had...
B
-----Original Message-----
From: Symes, Kate
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:09 AM
To: Williams III, Bill
Subject: Weather Database - PLEASE READ
Bill -
Could you take a look at what I've put together? Conceivably, this spreadsheet would link to a web page that we (or I) could maintain, which would include a WSCC map with hot buttons in or near the areas we trade that would give traders the most recent weather information. I talked to Cara about setting up an intranet site, as she had previously mentioned wanting us to do that, and she said she was working on setting something up with Fundamentals and Volume Management. That's a whole different subject - maybe we could chat about that briefly if you get a free moment. At any rate, this is a rough draft, but I thought I'd show it to you to make sure I'm heading in the right direction.
Kate
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I've just spoken with Christian Yoder, who said he's got the confirmation
letters for these deals on his desk. He's also planning to call you to
discuss this further - these deals and several others entered as part of an
EES acquisition will all be confirmed differently than usual. I'm not
completely clear on the subject, so I'm going to defer to Christian's legal
expertise.
But if you have any other questions, please let me know. I can certainly sit
down with Christian and maybe we can all conference call on the subject.
Thanks,
Kate
From: Sharen Cason 01/02/2001 08:38 AM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc: Kimberly Hundl/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Avista deals
There are two deals for Avista the are marked not to be confirmed. Can you
check into these, and if they are not to be confirmed, put a little note as
to why or who said not to confirm them, so 6 months from now when someone
says "Why didn't you confirm this deal!" I'll have something to jog my
memory. (Because I will have slept between now and then!)
Deal Numbers #487050 and 487054
Thanks!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Please review the following discrepancy and let me know what the price should
be.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 03/29/2000 09:58
AM ---------------------------
Stephanie Sever 03/27/2000 04:51 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff A Crook/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FirstEnergy Trading Services, Inc. - 0002 - Rate Discrepancy
Chris,
Per my phone message, please see below.
Thanks,
Stephanie x33465
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT on 03/27/2000
04:50 PM ---------------------------
Jeff A Crook
03/27/2000 12:39 PM
To: Dana Daigle/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Stephanie Sever/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mechelle Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: FirstEnergy Trading Services, Inc. - 0002 - Rate Discrepancy
Customer is short paying on deal 157848. ENA billed 72,500 @ $2.76 and
customer is paying at rate of $2.649. As per Dcaf and Sitara rate should be
IF-CGAS-Appalachia-MI which is equal ot $2.76. Please confirm rate for this
deal.
Thank you,
Jeff
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hi Nancy,
I need to bring you up-to-speed on where we are, and share some comments from
Virginia Power. Please let me know a good time to visit.
Thanks,
Kay
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Yes, it did. With many thanks to Scott and Tracy.
Sue Nord
10/23/2000 02:35 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Donald Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected]
Subject: Re: ETI's Quarterly Fee Statement in California Due the 15th
Do we know if this got filed?
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
10/11/2000 05:05 PM
To: [email protected] @ ENRON, Sue Nord/NA/Enron@Enron, Donald
Lassere/Enron Communications@Enron Communications
cc:
Subject: ETI's Quarterly Fee Statement in California Due the 15th
Just following up to make sure that accounting knows that ETI's quarterly fee
statement needs to be turned in by the 15th.
Best,
Jeff
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Are you or a designate going to this?
GP
-----Original Message-----
From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON
[mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Lite Bytz@ENRON
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2001 8:10 PM
To: ENW-Employees_Houston@ENRON
Subject: Lite Bytz RSVP
This week's Lite Bytz presentation will feature the following APPZ speaker:
Hal Elrod
CommodityLogic
Thursday, April 26, 2001
If you have not already signed up, please RSVP via email to
[email protected] by the end of the day Tuesday, April 24, 2001.
*Remember: this is now a Brown Bag Event--so bring your lunch and we will
provide
http://home.enron.com:84/messaging/revisedhalelrod.ppt
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I'm sorry to hear that, but it's better to figure that out now rather than
after you get married.
?-----Original Message-----
From: ? [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent:?? Tuesday, May 15, 2001 2:30 PM
To:???? Denney, Monica [CTH:RE81:EXCH]
Subject:??????? RE: Birthday party for Bryan
Nothing really wrong, but Jenn and I decided to go our separate ways.? I
still talk to her, and I think she's a great girl.? Its just that something
wasn't there.? I don't really know what my deal is, but I guess when we got
to the same city finally, we didn't quite have the same passion anymore.
It is actually very sad.? Like I said, she is a great girl, and I still
care about her a lot.? She is in Laredo right now for work, and I think we
are going to Galveston together on Sunday.
"Monica Denney" <[email protected]> on 05/15/2001 01:32:58 PM
To:?? [email protected]
cc:
Subject:? RE: Birthday party for Bryan
I'm still on a leave of absence.? I will probably go back to work in August
or September.
I had a feeling something was wrong because we hadn't heard from you in so
long.
I hope to talk to you soon.
Monica :-)
?-----Original Message-----
From:?? [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent:?? Tuesday, May 15, 2001 1:04 PM
To:???? Denney, Monica [CTH:RE81:EXCH]
Subject:??????? Re: Birthday party for Bryan
201 S. Heights #2721
Houston, TX 77007
I know its been awhile since we talked.? Are you back at work?? I thought
you were home now?? There is a lot that has gone on in my life lately.? I
will tell you everything a little later.
"Monica Denney" <[email protected]> on 05/15/2001 12:52:14 PM
To:?? Clint Dean <[email protected]>, Jenn Dickinson
????? <[email protected]>, Trent York
????? <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject:? Birthday party for Bryan
What is your address?? I need to send you an invitation to Bryan's birthday
party.? It will be at our house on May 27(superscript: th) from 8 pm until
whenever.
Thanks,
Monica Denney
Nortel Networks
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
ESN??????? 450-9595
v???? 512-418-0095????????????????????????????????????? 8310 N. Capital of
Tx. Hwy.
f????? 305-422-8485????????????????????????????????????? Suite 405
c???? 512-773-0095????????????????????????????????????? Austin, TX 78731
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 04/06/2001 12:01 PM -----
- Yahoo - Pacific Gas and Electric Company Files for Chapter 11
Reorganization.htm
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYI:
Praveen will be available on Thursday, May 4 at 10:00 AM Houston time.
Call him at 301/422-0889.
Thanks!
---------------------- Forwarded by Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT on 04/28/2000
08:05 AM ---------------------------
Mellacheruvu Venkata Praveen <[email protected]> on 04/27/2000 08:58:47 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: Telephone Interview with the Research Group
Dear Ms. Crenshaw,
The interviewers can call me at (301) 422 0889. Please do inform
them accordingly. Thank you for setting up the interview.
Regards,
Praveen Mellacheruvu.
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000 [email protected] wrote:
>
> Praveen:
>
> I have scheduled the conference call for Thursday, May 4 at 11:00 AM (EST)
> 10:00 AM (Central). It will be better if they can call you. Please le me
> know
> what number you can be reached at.
>
> If this is not allright, please let me know.
>
> Thanks and have a great day!
>
> Shirley Crenshaw
>
>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Dear HBS Alumni:
Who is going to be the next mayor of Houston?
How does local government contribute to the fostering and enhancement of key factors that contribute to Houston's economic vitality and quality of life? Who's the right person to lead and direct the government for the next two years? Houston residents will be pondering these and other related issues when they vote this November for the next mayor.
Join the HBS Club on October 8th as the mayoral candidates share their views on the future of Houston. Houston is facing major issues and each candidate will present his thoughts on what needs to be done to continue Houston's growth as a premier city. Following a fifteen-minute presentation by each candidate there will be a short question and answer period.
SPEAKER: Mayor Lee Brown, Council Members Chris Bell and Orlando Sanchez
DATE: Monday, October 8, 2001
TIME: 11:30 am Check in, 11:50 am Lunch, 12:10 pm Presentation
PLACE: Houston Club, 811 Rusk in downtown Houston
COST: Platinum Members: No charge Guests: $30
Gold Members: No charge Guests: $30
Silver Members: $25 Guests: $30
No shows will be charged.
RSVP: RESERVATIONS REQUIRED By 5:00 pm on October 4, 2001
email [email protected], phone (281) 424-3084,
fax (281) 424-4770 or at www.hbshouston.org
Mayor Lee P. Brown (Attendance is Pending) was first elected to office in 1997 and became the city's first African-American Mayor. He is currently serving a second term as Mayor of Houston. He earned a masters and doctorate in criminology from the University of California at Berkley and a bachelors in criminology from Fresno State University. He also earned a masters in Sociology from San Jose State. Mayor Brown has been appointed to several high profile positions in law enforcement and public safety which include the following: Public Safety Commissioner of Atlanta (1978-1982), Houston Police Chief (1982-1990), New York Police Commissioner (1990-1992) and Nation's Drug Czar under President Clinton (1993-1996). Throughout his career, Mayor Brown has also served as a professor at several universities: Texas Southern University, Rice University, Portland State University and Howard University. In the coming election, Mayor Brown will be seeking a third and final term as Mayor.
Council Member Chris Bell was first elected to city council in 1997. He is currently serving a second term on city council. Council Member Bell is an attorney with Beirne, Maynard, and Parsons. He is a graduate of the University of Texas and South Texas College of Law. Prior to his career in law, he worked as a reporter for KTRH Radio and was awarded Best Radio Reporter by the Texas Associated Press in 1991. Chris is also a very active member of the community. He serves on the boards of the Houston Chapter of the American Diabetes Association and Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Chris serves as an Advisory Board Member for the Houston Parkinson Society, an organization for which he holds his annual "Birthday for a Cure" fund-raiser to honor his late mother and raise money for Parkinson research.
Council Member Orlando Sanchez was first elected to city council in 1995. He is currently serving his third and final term on city council. He earned a bachelors in political science from the University of Houston. Councilman Sanchez has served as president of the Westwood Civic Association, managing director of Nexo Latino, a Hispanic marketing and communications company, and is a veteran of the U.S. Air Force and the Texas National Guard. In the coming election, Councilman Sanchez will be attempting to become the first Hispanic-American Mayor of Houston.
I hope you will be able to join us at this event.
Best Regards,
Sean Daichman
President
****************************************************************************************************
Reservation
Monday, October 8, 2001 Luncheon
Houston Mayoral Candidate Panel
Member Name:
Guest Name:
Platinum Members: No charge Guests: $30
Gold Members: No charge Guests: $30
Silver Members: $25* Guests: $30
No shows will be charged.
* Cost is $30 for members without reservations.
Payment Method (Check one)
1. _____ Credit card on file
2. _____ Credit Card (Visa, MC) Number: ________________ Exp Date: ______
3. _____ Cash or Check enclosed
RESERVATIONS REQUIRED. Reservations accepted until 5:00 pm on October 4,
2001. Fax this form to (281) 424-4770, e-mail [email protected], or call (281) 424-3084.
Upcoming Events
September 27 - Monthly Mixer
October 2 - Ambassador Djerejian Luncheon
October 4 - Breakfast Club Meeting at River Oaks Country Club
October 6 - Star Cruiser Social Event
October 11 - HBS Recruiting Mixer at St. Regis Hotel
October 18 - Breakfast Club Meeting at River Oaks Country Club
October 25 - Monthly Mixer
October 30 - Gerald Glenn, CEO Chicago Bridge & Iron Luncheon
November 29 - Bob Beauchamp, CEO BMC Software Luncheon
***************
Dottie Kerr ([email protected])
Administrator for Harvard Business School Club of Houstonhttp://www.hbshouston.org/
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
We need to input as planned originally, assuming Steve will hold those costs flat. Danny needs to understand that this is a $350,000 in EOL charges. I would not discuss the rest of the EIS with Danny.
-----Original Message-----
From: Barnes, Caroline
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:22 PM
To: Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: RE: 2002 Plan Assessments as of 9/19/01 for ETS - Transwestern Pipeline Co.
Here is a spreadsheet I have put together to show the 2001 budget vs the 2002 budget. Steve Hotte will be getting with Danny and ENW on the charges. We will be inputting the ENW numbers into Adaytum, and will change once Steve has had a chance to renegotiate. cvb
<< File: EIS 2002 ETS Allocation.xls >>
-----Original Message-----
From: Geaccone, Tracy
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Barnes, Caroline
Subject: RE: 2002 Plan Assessments as of 9/19/01 for ETS - Transwestern Pipeline Co.
Do we really have a choice on EOL. What is the total cost for ETS compared to what we orginally had in 2002? I need to discuss with Danny.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Barnes, Caroline
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:13 PM
To: Geaccone, Tracy
Subject: RE: 2002 Plan Assessments as of 9/19/01 for ETS - Transwestern Pipeline Co.
We have this line on the functional income statement and are handling it. Please note that the costs have more than doubled and Steve Hotte is preparing to discuss with ENW as to why? TW EOL charge is $113291 for 2002. Will Steve Harris want to continue using EOL for that amount?? Since you should have put $35,000 in commercial for EOL, I am reflecting the difference in the ENW line. cvb
-----Original Message-----
From: Geaccone, Tracy
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 2:09 PM
To: Barnes, Caroline
Subject: FW: 2002 Plan Assessments as of 9/19/01 for ETS - Transwestern Pipeline Co.
I assume you are handling for all of ETS?
-----Original Message-----
From: Yparraguirre, Jay
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:10 AM
To: Geaccone, Tracy; Barnes, Caroline
Subject: 2002 Plan Assessments as of 9/19/01 for ETS - Transwestern Pipeline Co.
Attached is the updated version of the 2002 plan assessments from ENW for your business unit. This intercompany billing invoice now includes pass throughs. Consistent with 2001, pass through billings (long distance, market data, WAN, etc.) will not be included in the standard assessments ("8xxxxxxx" accounts). They will be posted directly to direct expenses ("5xxxxxxx" accounts) at the cost center level. This pass through number is only a high level place holder and is not intended to replace the dollars already being budgeted for by each cost center owner.
If you have any questions, you can contact Kevin May at x52508 and he will answer any questions or direct you to the correct person.
If you are not the correct person to receive these assessments or if there is someone else that you would like to include in this process, please reply back to me with this information and I will add them to the contact list for future correspondence.
Thanks,
Jay
x53813
<< File: ETS - Transwestern IC 0914.xls >>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
This request has been pending your approval for 40 days. Please click http://itcapps.corp.enron.com/srrs/auth/emailLink.asp?ID=000000000057285&Page=Approval to review and act upon this request.
Request ID : 000000000057285
Request Create Date : 8/30/01 5:59:30 PM
Requested For : [email protected]
Resource Name : Market Data Kobra Power
Resource Type : Applications
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I want to make sure we're on the same page concerning the Asset Management Deal. Please review and let me know what you think!
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I think you have picked the two most interesting industries. Because energy
and telecom both have natural monopoly characteristics, the government gets
involved in economic regulation (not just the usual environment, safety,
labor and other types of regulation which all businesses are subject to).
That means that there is constant interplay between policy makers and the
business community and that policy makers have alot to say about which
business strategies will be successful.
Rob Wilson@ENRON
07/24/2000 04:44 PM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Mike McGowan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
Subject: Doctoral studies
Steve,
Vince Kaminski suggested I contact you, I'm the Gov't Affairs rep for NNG in
Omaha and begin a doctoral studies program this fall at NU. I plan a research
emphasis in regulatory politics, specific to energy and telecom market
convergence and the public interest. I'd welcome any advice or suggestions
you have regarding other potential area's of research, based on your
professional experience in the public policy arena.
I appreciate any guidance, I'm in the earliest stages of forming my advisory
committee and curriculum of study. My supervisor, Mike McGowan, sends his
regards.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
In case you all don't already have this, Pete gave me the rotating pager
number for his group. Hopefully this will enable us to get in contact with
someone on a weekend if the need arises.
713-515-1826.
I would only use this number on the weekends as we SHOULD be able to contact
someone during the week.
Thanks!
Brenna
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Next Tuesday, December 19th, the 50th floor will be open to all employees for
the Annual Holiday Open House from 3:00pm until 5:00pm. Similar to last
year, we will provide food, beverage and musical entertainment and will also
decorate eight executive offices to reflect the Festival of Lights. Our goal
is to expose our employees to different celebrations around the world and
simultaneously demystify the 50th floor.
For your reference, the offices that will be decorated are listed below:
St. Lucia - Ken Lay
Kwaanza - Jeff Skilling
Los Posadas - Rob Walls
Chinese New Year - Cindy Olson
Hanukkah - Andy Fastow
Ramadan - Rick Buy
Devali - Rick Causey
Christmas - Jim Derrick
We would welcome Executive Committee members to volunteer to greet employees
in the 50th floor elevator lobby or serve punch. Time slots are available
in 15-minute increments from 3:00pm to 5:00pm. Please reply to this e-mail
if you would like to volunteer for this event and I will provide additional
information for your reference at that time.
This annual affair is an employee favorite and you may contact me with any
comments or questions.
Charla Reese
Manager, Community Relations
x35202
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached for your review and comments is an amendment to the Compression
Services Agreement which, rather than extending the lock-in deadline,
clarifies the parties' original intent.
I understand we are meeting at 9:30 a.m. this morning in Rob Kilmer's office.
(EB 3991) to discuss.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Just to save you from having to call me, my husband Thomas Burton and I will
attend the dinner on May 13. Just let me know what to bring.
Andrea J. Preisinger
Employee Relations
Methodist Health Care System
713-394-6685 (office)
713-790-5099 (fax)
713-404-8302 (pager)
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
(1) Empire District Electric Company - Physical Power East only.
(2) AES Eastern Energy L.P. also open initially for Physical Power East only.
(3)Otherwise, Ditto Credit.
Tana Jones@ECT
05/17/2001 04:22 PM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey T Hodge/HOU/ECT@ECT, Marcus
Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON, Harry M Collins/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Minns/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Marie Heard/Enron
Communications@Enron Communications, Robbi Rossi/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, John Viverito/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jane McBride/AP/Enron@Enron,
Andrea Calo/SA/Enron@Enron, Peter Keohane/CAL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-17-01
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/17/2001 04:22 PM -----
Wendi Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate
05/17/2001 04:15 PM
To: Karen Lambert/ENRON@enronXgate, Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel
Schott/ENRON@enronXgate, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant
Reves/ENRON@enronXgate, Debbie R Brackett/ENRON@enronXgate, David
Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, Lesli Campbell/ENRON@enronXgate, Cynthia
Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, Enron Europe Global CounterParty/LON/ECT@ECT,
Stephanie Sever/ENRON@enronXgate, Tom Moran/ENRON@enronXgate, Claudia
Clark/ENRON@enronXgate, William S Bradford/ENRON@enronXgate, Lisa
Lees/ENRON@enronXgate, Juana Fayett/Corp/Enron@Enron, Jana
Morse/Corp/Enron@Enron, Trang Le/HOU/ECT@ECT, Paul Maley/LON/ECT@ECT, Sonya
Clarke/LON/ECT@ECT, Tim Davies/LON/ECT@ECT, Karen O'Day/ENRON@enronXgate,
Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Kelly Lombardi/ENRON@enronXgate, Brian
Lindsay/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, EOL Call Center@ECT, Bill
D Hare/ENRON@enronXgate, Amy Heffernan/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Molly LaFuze/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Danny
Clark/Enron Communications@Enron Communications, Stephanie
Panus/NA/Enron@Enron, Teresa Mandola/ENRON@enronXgate, Bill
Kyle/ENRON@enronXgate, Amber Ebow/ENRON@enronXgate, Wendi
Lebrocq/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:
Subject: EOL Approvals: 05-17-01
Please see attached
Regards,
Wendi LeBrocq
3-3835
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
FYR
Jim Derrick
-----Original Message-----
From: Walls Jr., Rob <[email protected]>
To: Derrick Jr., James <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu Nov 01 17:56:02 2001
Subject: FW: ENRON EUROPE
fyi
-----Original Message-----
From: Evans, Mark (London Legal)
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:49 PM
To: Haedicke, Mark E.; Walls Jr., Rob
Subject: ENRON EUROPE
Mark, Rob
My apologies for adding to your burden at this difficult time. However hopefully this might clarify our discussions of yesterday and enable us all to move on quickly.
Enron Europe and its directors are facing two related issues:
1. Continuing to trade
The directors of EEL and its subsids have to be satisfied that there is a reasonable prospect of avoiding an insolvent liquidation. This is a fairly low hurdle to pass and, in our situation, calls made on Corp. for cash have been promptly met and we have read the news today of a new confirmed facility so we already have a fair degree of comfort.
The directors meet with independent counsel tomorrow but I believe that they will probably come out of that session asking for nothing more than a confirmation, by email to say Michael Brown, but from the top - Jeff or Greg, of where they currently see things, ie a positive prognosis for the future. That piece of electronic paper should be enough to enable the directors to reasonably conclude that we are not hurtling into Chapt 11 and to continue to trade. It would also be very helpful if that email could confirm that Michael would be promptly informed if things took a downward turn.
I would be happy to draft a note but wonder whether the best way of quickly putting this to bed might be for a conversation to be had with Jeff/Greg to see what they would be prepared to say. That could then be drafted up and sent over.
2. Filing accounts
The directors of Enron Europe and its subsids cannot file accounts on a going concern basis unless they are comfortable they will have adequate funds in the medium term to run their businesses. The hurdle here is higher than in point 1 above as prospective cash shortages would require the accounts to be qualified long before the directors would have to stop trading under point 1 above. So more comfort will probably be required here, which could include further details of the new facility (drawdown conditions and maturity periods) and prospects for further facilities being signed. This would back up the usual support letter.
I should add that we have not actually received this year the usual support letter from Corp. addressed to Enron Europe and its subsids. I don't know if it has been formally requested but we will definitely need to see that document this time around. Could you please point me in the right direction for that?
We now have until the end of January to file the accounts so point 1 above is definitely the immediately crucial issue. We would however like to resolve the accounts issue as soon as possible. Perhaps we could liaise with Joel to get a letter drafted and then signed by Jeff or Greg?
That's it. It really boils down to requiring a bit more information from Corp. There is absolutely no desire to cause problems here, just a desire to put in place the right pieces of information (which we are sure are out there but we need to collect them in) which will safeguard the European directors personally and enable them to move on from these concerns to the more pressing business of Q4.
Many thanks.
Mark
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached is a revised Credit Watch listing as of 4/23/01. Please note that
NUI Utilities, Inc. has been placed on "No Trades".
If there are any personnel in your group that were not included in this
distribution, please insure that they receive a copy of this report.
To add additional people to this distribution, or if this report has been
sent to you in error, please contact Veronica Espinoza at x6-6002.
For other questions, please contact Bill Bradford at x3-3831, Russell Diamond
at x5-7095, or Brant Reves at x3-9897.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Enclosed is new language for offer letters regarding the AESOP.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Michelle
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------
Michelle Cash
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3823
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 853-6401
[email protected]
This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the
attorney-client and/or work product privileges.
----- Forwarded by Michelle Cash/HOU/ECT on 06/23/2000 05:14 PM -----
[email protected]
06/21/2000 10:55 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: AESOP Language
Michelle,
The new program still needs final approval by the Enron Corp. board of
directors. The design was tentatively approved last month, subject to final
review. The following revised provision should serve you well in the
meantime:
All-Employee Stock Option Program
Enron Corp. has previously awarded stock options to full time and part-time
regular employees in designated domestic and international locations through
the All Employee Stock Option Program (AESOP). Stock option grants were made
under this program to eligible employees hired prior to January 1, 2000. The
grants represented value for the time period of 12/31/94 through 12/31/00 or
a pro-rata portion if hired after 12/31/94. Subject to final approval by the
Enron Corp. board of directors, a one time award of non-qualified stock
options under a replacement program is proposed to be made to eligible
employees as of December 29, 2000, in value equal to 25% of annual base
salary (5% of annual base salary for a 5-year period; salary valuation and
value may vary in some international locations). Program awards are subject
to and effective upon the approval by the Compensation and Management
Development Committee of the Enron Corp. Board of Directors. Such stock
awards will be made pursuant to the appropriate Enron Corp. Stock Plan as
determined by the Committee. The exercise price for grants of stock options
will be determined according to the provisions of the Stock Plan under which
the award is granted. The program may or may not be offered in certain
domestic and international locations based upon management discretion and/or
local labor and employment laws.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Tracy:
Good morning. Attached below is the Weekly and my explanations for Steve. Let me know if you are OK with it.
Thanks!
Jan
X53858
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Per the request of Lorna, attached is a blackline of that legal opinion.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Please send a list of corporate types who could act a executor. I will get
back ASAP. Thank you.
[email protected] on 04/26/2001 10:54:38 AM
To: [email protected]
cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: important - something for you to ponder, and then respond please
David Hill put us in touch with Marco Crespi, who is at Morgan Stanley Dean
Witter Trust FSB in New Jersey. There is no local office of MSDW Trust, and
by local I mean in the State of Texas (not just Houston). Marco assures us
that MSDW Trust has authority to conduct trust business in all 50 states and
is sending us evidence of same. I am not worried about their authority to
do trust business here, but I am worried a bit about what I explain below.
Marco has informed us that, since MSDW Trust has no local presence, they
will not accept appointments to the more personal or high contact positions,
such as agent (attorney-in-fact) under a Statutory Durable Power of Attorney
and executor under a Last Will and Testament. Basically, all they take at
this point are trustee appointments.
This obviously puts a kink in your plans as outlined at our meeting in your
office on April 3 with David Hill and in our follow-up e-mails. We have
rough drafts of your documents in process and expected to send you some
first drafts by mid-week next week, but all those drafts name MSDW Trust to
the various positions you had in mind, some of which we now know are not
feasible.
If you want to name MSDW Trust as co-trustee on all the trusts, whether
created now or under your Will, that will work fine. However, you will not
very well be able to bridge the gap during any period of incapacity (under a
Power of Attorney) or during any period of estate administration (under a
Will) with another corporate fiduciary as co-agent or co-executor who then
is expected to hand off to MSDW Trust as trustee. In other words, if you
really want MSDW Trust in there for the long haul as co-trustee on all the
trusts (both now and after your death), your best bet is probably to have
only an individual serve as agent or executor (say your wife, for example),
as those jobs are temporary, to bridge the gap until the trusts are fully
funded after your estate administration is completed.
If you have any reticence about naming only an individual as agent or
executor (again, say your wife), you might consider having two individuals
named together as co-agent and co-executor to ameliorate your concerns (say
Caron with your wife?).
Of course, if you want to shop around town a bit for a corporate fiduciary
who could and would serve as co-agent and co-executor, we can provide a list
of several banks and trust companies and introduce you to most in the city.
Baker Botts has no horse in this race other than you and Debbie, of course,
and we will not favor MSDW Trust or any other trust company, one over
another. You favor MSDW, though, and I'd like to help you work out a plan
that uses them.
Please let me know your thoughts, as I know you are eager to put at least
some of this to bed soon, and Adam Schucher (here at Baker Botts) has
prepared first drafts that require only my review and revisions prior to
sending them to you. It just looks now like there may be more revisions
than we originally anticipated.
Sorry for the news. Please advise. I'll be out today after 11:15 but will
be in tomorrow and next week.
SD
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Here are details of the problem we're having with the Tagg IQ Reports:
Three Mid-Columbia futures trades were executed by Matt Motley, Long Term
Southwest Desk, on 2/5, 2/6, and 2/7.
Trades pulled into Tagg IQ Reports -
All three pull into Future Daily Transaction Report (RSX0245F.IQR)
Only two pull into Future Net Position Summary (RXSNSUMF.IQR)
All three pull into Tagg Exchange Capture search - transaction IDs are
980362/983837/987050
All three pulled into Tagg Metacalc (Meta ID 77771 - Post ID 1035917 - Post
ID 77880 - Post ID 1037269) until 2/9 - NOW GONE
Because today is the Nymex Electricity Futures exercise date, we need to know
as soon as possible for our calculations whether or not these deals are in
the system, and if not, where they went. My confusion lies in the fact that I
can find these deals when I do a search in Tagg for any futures deals traded
at the Mid-C settlement index, and yet the Risk group can no longer see
anything for Mid-C in their calculation. Please let me know what you find.
Thank you,
Kate
503-464-7486
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE ENRON STOCK FUND IN THE ENRON CORP. SAVINGS AND ESOP PLANS
On Friday, January 11, trading of Enron stock was suspended on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). All Savings and ESOP Plan transactions, including 401(k) payroll contributions, involving this fund were placed in a pending status until trading resumed.
As announced by Enron's Office of the Chair on Wednesday, January 16, Enron stock would now be traded Over The Counter (OTC). Upon receiving this information, work began immediately to develop a process that allows for OTC trades in the plans.
On Thursday, January 17, Enron initiated a process to facilitate OTC trades of Enron stock inside the 401(k) and ESOP and all pending transactions were processed using Thursday's closing price.
Now that trading has resumed, we urge you to review your investment elections to ensure that they are consistent with your investment goals.
As things change, we will continue to update you.
Enron Benefits Department
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Kim,
Crazy as a fox in a mini-skirt and heels.
Laird
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached is a draft of a Master Agreement for Markwest. To whom do I send
the draft to? Or do you want to forward same to Markwest? Please advise.
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 01/29/2001 01:27
PM ---------------------------
From: Alisha Guerrero @ ECT 01/29/2001 01:26 PM
To: Mark Bernstein/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gail Tholen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Kay
Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mark Lian/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Herman
Manis/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Co-op City Meeting
This is to confirm the Co-op City Meeting that has been scheduled for Tuesday
1/29/2001 at 2:00 PM in EB3394. If you have any questions or need any
further assistance please give me a call at x36355.
Thank you,
Alisha Guerrero
x36355
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Jeff:
CERA just informed me that as a CERA member, we will receive one copy of this
report. He will forward me a copy in the next day or so. I know you are
interested in it, and will get you a copy as soon as I receive it.
Jennifer
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Stock price?
--------------------------
Rick S.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Marcelo,
Evidently, there has been some discussion regarding the use of Enpower for
Natural Gas basis options. As a result I've been advised to hold off on any
meetings until further notice. Thanks again for all of your help and I will
be in touch with you as soon as I know how we are going to progress.
Susan
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I have attached the resume of LeShawn Edwards who has worked in a contract position in our group since July of this year. I want to recommend her to you for any openings you may have now or in the future. She is still actively working in our area, but is seeking permanent employment. Also, if you know of other groups within Enron that might be interviewing for financial team members, please forward her resume.
The experience LeShawn has gained with the Enron organization and with SAP would be a huge loss if she were to leave Enron. She has been an great asset in our group and is a diligent and professional individual. If we had a opening at this time I would not hesitate about hiring LeShawn. You can see by her resume she has had a very stable work background while also attending the University of Houston, where she graduated last December with a BBA - Finance.
If you would like to meet LeShawn, she is located at 3AC-3321. Her extension is 5-6271.
If you would like more information, please don't hesitate to contact me at 3-5292 or Amy Villasenor, who has worked closely with LeShawn, at 5-5512.
Thanks.
Lee Baker
Manager Financial Planning
ETS Operations Financial Planning
(713) 853-5292
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I was just wondering if there was any more information available regarding
the upcoming Super Saturday events. I would be glad to help out in any
capacity.
Thanks,
Susan
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Oh now you're teasing me! I went riding last night. I think I need some
winter motorcycle gear. My brother and I are taking a biking trip in
November - don't know where we are going yet.
How's the new job? What do you do with yourself in the evenings now?
Alicia Perkins@EES
10/11/2000 03:12 PM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject:
Long time no talk. How have you been? Have you been riding your motorcycle
a lot? Maybe we can go to Barnaby's next week.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Who needs to participate from Calgary and Portland so I can email them the AT&T conference call number and participant code.
-Ina
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Today, Enron hosted a conference call to give investors a current overview of the company. Here's an update of what we discussed during the call.
We told investors that we're doing everything we can to protect their interests and to regain their confidence. Our focus remains on our credit quality, balance sheet and liquidity, which are essential for our continued success and expansion of our wholesale businesses.
It took more than a few weeks to get where we are today. Here's a snapshot of significant events that led to our current situation:
-- In hindsight, we definitely made some very bad investments in our non-core businesses over the past several years. Those include investments in Azurix, India and Brazil. They have performed far worse that we could have ever imagined when we made these investments;
-- Because of these bad investments, we've become over-leveraged as a company. The negative impact of those investments was exacerbated through the extensive use of debt capital both on and off our balance sheet;
-- We also entered into related party transactions that led to a loss of investor confidence, which has been very damaging;
-- We've been criticized for our lack of transparency and our hard-to-understand financial and operating disclosures; and
-- On top of it all, we discovered errors in our financial statements, as discussed in our 8-K filing last week, that required a restatement of previously reported earnings.
We've taken a new look at our businesses and have separated them into three areas: core businesses, non-core businesses, and businesses under review.
Core Businesses
Our core businesses remain strong and consistent sources of significant earnings and cash flows for the company. They're our competitive advantage. These include:
-- Natural gas pipeline businesses;
-- Gas and power businesses in North America and Europe;
-- Retail businesses in North America and Europe; and
-- Coal businesses in North America and Europe.
The events of the past few weeks have had a temporary negative impact on our projected fourth quarter profitability. It's too early to tell at this time what impact this might have on our operating results. We are considering these actions now so that we can quickly return to normal business in 2002.
I also remain optimistic that the actions we've taken over the past couple of weeks have addressed our customer and counterparty credit and liquidity concerns. According to our business unit leaders, we have definitely seen improvement in our counterparty relationships.
Non-Core Businesses
Our non-core businesses include our global assets group and our broadband division. We have invested more than $8 billion in these businesses, and the return from them has been dismal.
We have an aggressive program in place to exit these businesses and expect that the sale of these businesses will generate billions of dollars in cash that we can use to repay debt and reinvest in our core businesses. We already have more than $800 million in assets contracted for sale this year. They include CEG Rio, a gas LDC in Brazil; EcoElectrica, a power plant and LNG receiving terminal in Puerto Rico; and asset sales of offshore oil and gas properties in India. The approximately $2.9 billion Portland General sale is also on target to close in late 2002 pending regulatory approvals.
Businesses Under Review
These businesses are comprised of those operations outside our power and gas wholesale businesses and include global and industrial markets. While several of these businesses have very strong future prospects, we need to determine if their capital requirements and near-term growth prospects are sufficient enough in terms of earnings and cash generation.
Reviewing our businesses this way will help determine where we need to make reductions to our work force. More information will follow as soon as it becomes available.
Credit Rating/10-Q Filing
We continue to meet regularly with credit rating agencies and believe that our liquidity enhancements and scheduled asset sales will strengthen our balance sheet and maintain our investment grade credit rating. Our current credit ratings by the three major rating agencies are as follows:
-- Moody's at Baa3 "Under Review for Further Downgrade"
-- Fitch at BBB- "Evolving Status"
-- S&P at BBB- "CreditWatch Negative"
We also discussed our existing financial vehicles, including Osprey, Marlin and Yosemite, in further detail. We told investors that we will file our 10-Q five days late due to our current activities. It will be filed on Nov. 19.
We will continue to have updates with investors over the coming weeks as well as our frequent updates with you. The full transcript of our conference call will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in the next few days. It will also be posted on our web site at www.enron.com/corp/investors under "SEC Filings."
In connection with the proposed transactions, Dynegy and Enron will file a joint proxy statement/prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors and security holders are urged to carefully read the joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding the proposed transactions when it becomes available, because it will contain important information. Investors and security holders may obtain a free copy of the joint proxy statement/prospectus (when it is available) and other documents containing information about Dynegy and Enron, without charge, at the SEC's web site at www.sec.gov. Copies of the joint proxy statement/prospectus and the SEC filings that will be incorporated by reference in the joint proxy statement/prospectus may also be obtained for free by directing a request to either: Investor Relations, Dynegy Inc., 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5800, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 507-6466, Fax: (713) 767-6652; or Investor Relations, Enron Corp., Enron Building, 1400 Smith Street, Houston, TX 77002, Phone: (713) 853-3956, Fax: (713) 646-3302.
In addition, the identity of the persons who, under SEC rules, may be considered "participants in the solicitation" of Dynegy and Enron shareholders in connection with the proposed transactions, and any description of their direct or indirect interests, by security holdings or otherwise, are available in an SEC filing under Schedule 14A made by each of Dynegy and Enron.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Bilateral
---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 12/07/2000
13:48 ---------------------------
Louise Kitchen
12/07/2000 13:48
To: Tana Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: [email protected]
Subject: Confidentiality Agreement
Please can you send a confidentiality agreement to Mark as we have a meeting
tomorrow morning at 9am.
Thanks
Louise
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Total Trades for Day 629
EOL Deals From: 11/01/2001 To: 11/13/2001 EnPower From: 11/01/2001 To: 11/13/2001
Desk Total Deals Total MWH Desk Total Deals Total MWH
EPMI Long Term California 373 5,787,856 EPMI Long Term California 36 1,256,554
EPMI Long Term Northwest 177 2,456,200 EPMI Long Term Northwest 76 2,553,393
EPMI Long Term Southwest 236 5,578,466 EPMI Long Term Southwest 201 7,778,128
EPMI Short Term California 1,036 1,262,040 EPMI Short Term California 375 935,081
EPMI Short Term Northwest 602 776,640 EPMI Short Term Northwest 249 495,213
EPMI Short Term Southwest 813 1,193,952 EPMI Short Term Southwest 404 1,674,462
Real Time 769 19,525 Real Time 271 26,026
Grand Total 4,006 17,074,679 Grand Total 1,612 14,718,858
EOL Deals From: 11/13/2001 To: 11/13/2001 EnPower From: 11/13/2001 To: 11/13/2001
Desk Total Deals Total MWH Desk Total Deals Total MWH
EPMI Long Term California 50 792,400 EPMI Long Term California 3 42,800
EPMI Long Term Northwest 24 474,600 EPMI Long Term Northwest 8 447,831
EPMI Long Term Southwest 41 1,090,821 EPMI Long Term Southwest 4 65,930
EPMI Short Term California 104 112,328 EPMI Short Term California 33 38,576
EPMI Short Term Northwest 76 72,400 EPMI Short Term Northwest 26 28,952
EPMI Short Term Southwest 112 148,200 EPMI Short Term Southwest 40 133,428
Real Time 77 1,925 Real Time 28 2,250
Grand Total 484 2,692,674 Grand Total 142 759,767
EOL Deals From: 11/13/2001 To: 11/13/2001 EOL Deals From: 11/13/2001 To: 11/13/2001
Long Term West Management Total Deals Total MWH Short Term West BOM Total Deals Total MWH
Daily 0 0 Daily 0 0
Month-to-Date EOL 9 2,200 Month-to-Date EOL 0 0
Enpower daily deals 0 0 Enpower daily deals 0 0
Month-to-Date Enpower 2 2,003 Enpower daily deals 0 0
EOL Deals From: 11/13/2001 To: 11/13/2001
EPMI California Services Total Deals Total MWH
Daily 0 0
Month-to-Date 0 0
Enpower daily deals 0 0
ICE Volumes From: 11/13/2001 To: 11/13/2001
Delivery Point Total MWH EPMI MWH Price
Cob (OP, Next Day) 400 0 $ 18.50
Cob (P, Next Day) 800 0 $ 24.00
Mid C (P, Next Day) 6,000 400 $ 23.67
Mid C (OP, Next Day) 600 0 $ 17.67
Mid C (OP, Bal Month) 13,200 8,800 $ 19.38
Mid C (P, Bal Month) 15,600 0 $ 24.42
Mid C (P, Dec-01) 110,000 0 $ 33.53
Mid C (P, Jan-02) 31,200 0 $ 34.27
Mid C (P, Mar-02) 41,600 0 $ 32.90
Mid C (P, Apr-02) 31,200 0 $ 28.80
Mid C (P, May-02) 10,400 0 $ 25.80
Mid C (P, Jun-02) 10,000 0 $ 28.00
Mid C (P, Jul-02) 20,800 0 $ 42.70
Mid C (P, Aug-02) 10,800 0 $ 50.40
Mid C (P, Q1 02) 30,400 0 $ 33.20
Mid C (P, Q2 02) 92,400 0 $ 27.37
NP-15 (P, Next Day) 4,000 400 $ 26.60
NP-15 (OP, Next Day) 2,800 600 $ 20.38
NP-15 (P, Bal Month) 15,600 0 $ 26.83
NP-15 (OP, Bal Month) 4,400 0 $ 21.00
NP-15 (OP, Dec-01) 8,600 0 $ 27.20
NP-15 (P, Dec-01) 60,000 0 $ 33.73
NP-15 (P, Jan-02) 20,800 0 $ 33.68
NP-15 (P, Mar-02) 10,400 0 $ 32.50
Palo (P, Custom) 10,000 0 $ 24.10
Palo (P, Next Day) 11,600 0 $ 22.22
Palo (OP, Next Day) 1,800 0 $ 12.42
Palo (P, Bal Month) 83,200 5,200 $ 23.02
Palo (OP, Dec-01) 25,800 0 $ 19.25
Palo (P, Dec-01) 90,000 10,000 $ 28.07
Palo (P, Jan-02) 10,400 0 $ 30.20
Palo (P, Feb-02) 19,200 0 $ 29.63
Palo (P, Apr-02) 10,400 0 $ 31.20
Palo (P, Jul-02) 10,400 0 $ 55.50
Palo (P, Aug-02) 10,800 0 $ 61.30
Palo (P, Sep-02) 38,400 0 $ 47.49
Palo (P, Q1 02) 60,800 0 $ 30.05
Palo (P, Q3 02) 30,800 0 $ 55.00
Palo (P, Q4 02) 30,800 0 $ 36.80
SP-15 (HE 1200) 25 0 $ 26.50
SP-15 (HE 1300) 25 0 $ 25.25
SP-15 (HE 1400) 25 0 $ 25.25
SP-15 (HE 1500) 25 0 $ 25.25
SP-15 (HE 1600) 25 0 $ 25.25
SP-15 (OP, Next Day) 2,200 0 $ 18.27
SP-15 (P, Next Day) 6,800 400 $ 25.93
SP-15 (P, Bal Month) 36,400 0 $ 26.20
SP-15 (P, Dec-01) 20,000 0 $ 32.75
SP-15 (P, Jan-02) 20,800 10,400 $ 32.75
SP-15 (P, Q1 02) 60,800 0 $ 32.58
Grand Total 1,143,525 36,200 $ 1,488.76
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Has this been set? Who is coming? What is the agenda?
"Barrett H. Reasoner" <[email protected]> 05/25/2001 02:36 PM To: "'Sanders, Richard'" <[email protected]> cc: Subject: meeting with experts
What looks better for you: June 11-12 or 12-13?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I assigned Candis detention for tomorrow afternoon. She walked into class this morning and announced that she was leaving to go to the restroom without waiting for my response and then was tardy to class.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Marianne, i increased the 33dth to 800dth for 1/30-31. i will forward this
email to Chris Germany and let him discuss the price with Brian. is that OK
with you???
k64231/126 was=33 now=800
---------------------- Forwarded by Joann Collins/Corp/Enron on 01/30/2000
11:48 AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 01/30/2000 09:44:25 AM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: " - *Perrone, Brian" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: CKY 1/27 and 1/28
There is a later one also than came back undeliverable and I resent which I
will forward. And also per Brian we needed it through the end of month
also.
It does get confusing. There are numbers flying around from everywhere. I
guess there is nothing you can do today. I really need this through the end
of month. There are huge penalties involved here.
[email protected] on 01/30/2000 10:34:35 AM
Please respond to [email protected]
To: Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas@COLUMBIAGAS
cc:
Subject: Re: CKY 1/27 and 1/28
Marianne here is the email you sent that said only for 27&28th.
---------------------- Forwarded by Joann Collins/Corp/Enron on 01/30/2000
09:31 AM ---------------------------
(Embedded Enron North America Corp.
image moved
to file: From: Joann Collins
pic27304.pcx) 01/27/2000 11:20 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Re: CKY 1/27 and 1/28 (Document link: Joann Collins)
K64231
[email protected] on 01/27/2000 10:19:32 AM
To: Joann Collins/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: " - *Swogger, Joanne"
<[email protected]>, " - *Perrone,
Brian" <[email protected]>
Subject: CKY 1/27 and 1/28
Just talked to Brian..... I need the additional 767 dth for the above two
days
going to CKY (18-12). Please let me know the contract number.
- pic27304.pcx
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
----- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 05/22/2001 02:17 PM -----
Mary Cook
05/22/2001 01:34 PM
To: Tiffany Williams/NA/Enron@Enron, Jay Epstein/Enron@EnronXGate
cc: Cheryl Nelson/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Paper Pulp Confirms: corrections
See attached revised language per the request of Jay Epstein that interest
not be inlcuded in the calculation.
Cordially,
Mary Cook
Enron North America Corp.
1400 Smith, 38th Floor, Legal
Houston, Texas 77002-7361
(713) 345-7732 (phone)
(713) 646-3490 (fax)
[email protected]
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The plan was to hit the issue twice -- once in the short format of Ebiz and
at greater length in the longer format of the October issue of Enron
Business. Please let Paul know.
---------------------- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/HOU/EES on 08/14/2000 08:46
AM ---------------------------
Elizabeth Linnell
08/11/2000 11:54 AM
To: Elizabeth Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON@ECT,
Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Politics and Enron
Just as a matter of interest, I looked up this guy and he's in London, not in
the US.
From: Elizabeth Labanowski@ECT on 08/11/2000 11:50 AM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES@ENRON, Elizabeth
Linnell/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: Politics and Enron
I understand that there is a longer, more involved piece coming out - don't
know where exactly. We need to respond to this guy with that info.
Karen Denne@ENRON
08/11/2000 11:32 AM
To: Steven J Kean/HOU/EES@EES, Elizabeth Labanowski/EPSC/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Politics and Enron
FYI -- seems that employees want more info....
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 08/11/2000
11:31 AM ---------------------------
Sarah Palmer@ECT
08/11/2000 11:26 AM
To: Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeannie Mandelker/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mary
Clark/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Erin A Rice/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Politics and Enron
Not so good PAC feedback...
---------------------- Forwarded by Sarah Palmer/HOU/ECT on 08/11/2000 11:24
AM ---------------------------
Paul Sharp@ECT
08/11/2000 03:35 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: politics and Enron
"Everything You've Wanted to Know About Enron and the Presidential Campaign
But Were Afraid to Ask" ?????
Far from everything!
Your "Where the money is spent" section tells us nothing about specific
contributions to the Election 2000 campaigns, nor Soft money corporate
donations to things such as party conferences.
Scared of alienating employees?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Thanks, Sara. Any luck on getting the LC form?
Jordan
From: Sara Shackleton on 12/06/2000 04:20 PM
To: Jordan Mintz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joseph Deffner/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sarah Wesner/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: (00-414) Margin Rate Change for Natural Gas
Here is the latest margin rate change -
----- Forwarded by Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT on 12/06/2000 04:19 PM -----
[email protected]
12/04/2000 02:08 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: (00-414) Margin Rate Change for Natural Gas
Notice No. 00-414
December 04, 2000
TO:
ALL NYMEX MEMBERS AND MEMBER FIRMS
ALL NYMEX CLEARING FIRMS
ALL NYMEX OPERATIONS MANAGERS
FROM: Neal Wolkoff, Executive Vice President
SUBJECT: MARGIN RATE CHANGE
Effective Date: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 (close of business)
Futures Contract: Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures
Contract Months: All Months
Rate Change:
NYMEX Division Margins on Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contracts
Effective Date: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 (close of business)
Clearing Member (Maintenance Margin): Old: $7,500 New: $10,000
Member Customer (Initial Margin): Old: $8,250 New: $11,000
Non-Member Customer (Initial Margin): Old: $10,125 New: $13,500
Should you have any questions regarding these changes, please contact Arthur
McCoy at (212) 299-2928 or Joe Sanguedolce at (212) 299-2855. This notice
supersedes all previous notices regarding outright margins for the NYMEX
Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures Contract.
__________________________________________________
Please click on the link below to indicate you have received this
email.
"
http://208.206.41.61/email/[email protected]&r
efdoc=(00-414)"
Note: If you click on the above line and nothing happens, please copy
the text between the quotes, open your internet browser,
paste it into the web site address and press Return.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]@ENRON [NOTES:[email protected]@ENRON]
To: Kitchen, Louise <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue Jan 22 23:20:37 2002
Subject: Expense Reports Awaiting Your Approval
The following reports have been waiting for your approval for more than 4 days. Please review.
Owner: Timothy N Belden
Report Name: Belden HOU Trip 011402
Days In Mgr. Queue: 4
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Yahoo! News Edit Breaking News Alerts - Yahoo!
Breaking News Alert edit
WASHINGTON _ Bush to name Pitt to head SEC, official says.
Click here!
[IMAGE]
If you no longer wish to receive this alert, click here to unsubscribe.
If you have questions, send us feedback.
Copyright , 1994-2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Yahoo Privacy Policy
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Anthony Duenner@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 12/15/99 01:46:35 PM
To: Mark Ruane@ECT, Zimin Lu@ECT
cc:
Subject: Presentation in Seoul
Better late than never -- I again wanted to thank both of you for taking the
time and making the effort to make the RAROC and Real Options presentations
in Seoul earlier this month. Both presentations were well received and I had
a number of favorable comments and expressions of thanks form our hosts after
the presentations. I know you both have very busy schedules -- especially
around this time of year -- and very much appreciate your help. Regards.
Anthony Duenner
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
January 31, 2002
DETERMINATION OF CASHOUT PRICES BY ZONE ($/MMBTU)
January, 2002
. 5 Week Avg High Low
STX Zone $2.288 $2.450 $2.220
ETX Zone $2.315 $2.520 $2.170
WLA Zone $2.310 $2.540 $2.080
ELA Zone $2.323 $2.550 $2.090
MARKET AREA $2.309 $2.515 $2.145
*******************************************************************
NOTE:
Duke Energy Gas Transmission respects your online time and privacy.
You have received this email because you elected to subscribe. To
unsubscribe, login to the E-mail Notification Subscription page at
http://www.link.duke-energy.com/script2/Notification.asp
uncheck the appropriate checkbox, and click the Submit button.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
It was.
[email protected] wrote:
> Was it an emergency bill?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Reminder!
The Alexis de Tocqueville Breakfast is just a few days away. Please RSVP if you have not already done so.
Date: Tuesday, July 31
Time: 7:30-9:00 a.m.
Location: The Center for the Retarded, 3550 W. Dallas, between Waugh Dr. and Shepherd
RSVP: Please call or e-mail Zulie Flores, ext. 3-3908
Transportation:
A bus will depart from the Andrews St. side of the Enron Building at 7:20 a.m. Please let Zulie know if you plan to take the bus. If you prefer to drive, directions to The Center are below.
Leadership Campaign
Enron's Leadership Campaign kicked-off on July 23 and is well underway. As you know, participation by Enron's executive team is vital to the success of the campaign. To make your contribution, please click on http://cr.enron.com/unitedway. Thank you for making a difference.
We look forward to seeing you next week! Please call Kathy Mayfield at ext.3-3264 if you have any questions.
Directions to The Center for the Retarded, 3550 W. Dallas, between Waugh Dr. and Shepherd:
From the Enron Building
? Take W. Dallas and turn RIGHT on Marston St.
? Follow the signs to parking
or you can?
? Take Allen Parkway from Downtown
? Turn LEFT on Tirrell St.
? Turn RIGHT on W. Dallas
? From W. Dallas, turn RIGHT on Marston St., which is the entrance to The Center
? Follow the signs to parking
From the Galleria Area
? Take 610 North to the Woodway/Memorial exit
? Exit and turn RIGHT on Woodway
? Woodway turns into Memorial - take Memorial to the Shepherd exit
? Exit and turn RIGHT on Shepherd
? Make a LEFT on to Allen Parkway at the light
? Turn RIGHT on Tirrell St.
? Take a RIGHT on W. Dallas, and then turn RIGHT on Marston St., which is the entrance to The Center
? Follow the signs to parking
From North of Downtown
? Take 45 or 59 SOUTH to I-10. Go WEST on I-10
? Take the Shepherd/Durham exit
? Take a LEFT (South) on Shepherd
? Take Shepherd to the light at Allen Parkway/Kirby
? Make a LEFT on to Allen Parkway at the light
? Turn RIGHT on Tirrell St.
? Take a RIGHT on W. Dallas, and then turn RIGHT on Marston St., which is the entrance to The Center
? Follow the signs to parking
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
The main issue that I see with the description you sent me is the same one
that we spoke about a few weeks ago.
What should the consistent market convention for determining the first
tranaction be? If we use the current NG trading convention we will quote the
premium swap as the "first transaction" and the discount as the second.
This will present consistency problems if we are trading near parity in the
calendar with different months changing position in the curve. You just have
to look at some of the summer spreads to see the confusion that may result.
Having the near dated swap as the first transaction in all cases would
eliminate that issue but will not match the current trading convention. I
will check with John to see if he has any opinion on the matter. The product
description would have to be written such that any customer would be easily
be able to determine the correct direction to trade.
I will discuss this and the entire description with John on Tues. and get
back to you .
Thanks
Pete
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I can't believe you're leaving! I hope wherever you go next brings you joy
and fulfillment, but you'll definitely be missed here. Thanks for all your
help. Good luck!
Kate
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
BLACKOUT BUSTERS, BUSINESS CONTINUITY AND ENERGY COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
the following documents were submitted to the PUC as indicated below.
Please open and review per Barbara Barkovich. Thanks. Laura
############################################################################
#####################
Tuesday, April 24, 2001, Pacific Gas & Electric Company filed Advice
Letter 2106-E with the CPUC.
Electric Interruptible Load Programs
<<2106-E AL.doc>> <<2106-E TS.doc>>
Advice 2106-E is being sent electroniclly to parties to R. 01-10-002.
Thank You,
Nel Avendano ([email protected])
Rates (415-973-3529)
- 2106-E AL.doc
- 2106-E TS.doc
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Was down $10mm in Q3 - did you know?
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Start Date: 4/8/01; HourAhead hour: 16; No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001040816.txt
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
Details: (Hour: 16 / Preferred: 12.00 / Final: 11.98)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTRT
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/8/01
TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BEAR
ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Garrett,
Recognizing that Ontario does not open until Mar 02, and recognizing that we have positions starting then, and recognizing that the curve doesn't have prices posted for reference dates prior to Mar 02, the value-at-risk engine is getting errors in it's simulations due to lack of prices thereof.
Can you do either of the below?
? Post prices for dates up to Mar 02? (realize their isn't market?.tough issue)
o If you post a price, I'm not sure it will mean much other than letting VAR run, primarily because there isn't position prior to Mar 02. Perhaps you can fill in hole with a realistic price so prompt month correlations don't go wacko?I guess.. Stacey help.
? Recommend a "like" curve to map R20 to so that we can get around zero price issues? Realize that mapping will include entire term structure and not just for the reference dates with zero price.
? Other ideas?
I appreciate your help in working toward a solution.
Thanks,
Frank
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Joe,
In April last year we submitted a copy of the attached work plan to your
office. I believe your office forwarded the plan on to your Austin office for
review. The scope of the work plan has been completed. Please let me know if
you have any further questions regarding this issue.
Thanks, George
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe H. Guerra Jr. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, May 07, 1999 3:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Pecos County # 6 Compressor Station-Northern Natural Gas Company
George,
I have a slight dilema. Are you working a site by the name of:
Pecos County # 6 Compressor Station-Northern Natural Gas Company
If so, is their a possibility of obtaining a copy of the lastest report.
The Austin office indicates we took in to our reception a report on May 7,
1998. But, for some reason we (Midland) do not have anything relating to
this. Can you please advise either way. I would appreciate it. Thanks
George.
Joe H. Guerra Jr.
Site Remediation Coordinator
Texas Railroad Commission
Midland District 8/8A
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached please find the EES positions as of March 22 with both PV and Nominal positions. We are working on updating to reflect positions as of March 26th.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mills, Scott
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 11:44 AM
To: McMichael Jr., Ed; Parks, Joe; Dicarlo, Louis; Chilkina, Elena
Cc: Ratliff, David; Draper, David
Subject: EES Price, Basis and Index Positions (as of 03.22.01)
Attached is the information that we discussed last evening.
Please note the following -there are separate tabs for price, basis and index.
The tabs that indicate "OXY II Only" are exactly that -the deals associated with the potential second bid from OXY for additional activity.
The tabs that DO NOT indicate OXY II consolidate both the base keeper list + the OXY II activity.
If there is any doubt as to what you are looking at, check the first four lines or the worksheet. There will be a designation of what is and is not included.
SRM
<< File: 03.22.01 Nesco (txt).xls >>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Kam and Jeff,
I updated all of the indexes changes on my end, but I cannot get a clear confirmation that Tagg has updated them on their end. Can you please find out and let me know? I would appreciate it.
Thanks,
Dawn
-----Original Message-----
From: Keiser, Kam
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:35 PM
To: Kenne, Dawn C.
Cc: Sweitzer, Tara
Subject: index name changes
Please see attached. There is a before and after column for those products that will have index name changes.
Thanks
KK
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I didn't know where to ask, so here goes. Please advise me of whom I need to contact. I recently was going thru My dad and mother's belongings, I found a life insurance policy for my dad. It was issued by Northwestern National Life Insurance Company, thru Northern Natural Gas Company to Lawrence Maitland Rowden in October of 1952. I am trying to find out if it is still in affect, as my dad passed away in 1999. Any help or guidance would be greatly appreciated. Michael Rowden ( surviving son) 7000 Millennium Dr. Fort Smith, AR 72916 (501-788-8907) Work #
____________________________________________________[IMAGE] IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Greg,
Transport Deals/Transport Model
OA
Relationships between systems (Tagg, Sitara, Portcalc, MetaCalc, Curveview,
Excel, Access, Pub Posting, TDS)
These are mostly basic.
DG
Greg Couch
04/17/2001 01:16 PM
To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Revival of the Risk brown bag sessions
Just a reminder to each of you that I requested this info by tomorrow. I've
received only one response so far.
Let me know if you have questions.
Greg
---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Couch/HOU/ECT on 04/17/2001 01:13 PM
---------------------------
Greg Couch
04/10/2001 05:36 PM
To: Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phillip M Love/HOU/ECT@ECT, Darron C
Giron/HOU/ECT@ECT, Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON, David
Baumbach/HOU/ECT@ECT, John Valdes/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martha Stevens/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Russ Severson/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Revival of the Risk brown bag sessions
I have decided to revive the risk brown bag training sessions.
I need, from each of you, a list of the topics you would like to see
covered. I would like to see topics ranging from the most basic, up -
whatever you feel is necessary for your group. Please provide these to me no
later than 04/18. Feel free to offer anything. Think about the concepts in
the training modules while you are compiling your lists.
Once I have the topics, I will work with you to arrange a logical order to
cover them in. After that Irena and I will set up a calendar, with
approximately one session per month. I am targeting mid-May for the first
session.
The format of each session is up to the presenter, but a couple of
suggestions are: a short presentation followed by Q&A, or an open forum.
Each session will be led by one of you, a suitable substitute, Jeff, or I,
depending on the topic. I will schedule, with your input and cooperation,
who will present each topic.
I am also sending this note to John and Russ.
John, I ask that you think about OA concepts that you feel will benefit the
risk group, help our personnel work better with your group, and help us
understand your duties better. I would like for you to present at least a
couple of topics to us.
Russ, if you think there are Sitara issues that would benefit the group,
please let me know.
I am open to whether these sessions are mandatory or not. My feeling is that
some should be and others (the ones of a more basic nature) should only be
mandatory for those people you feel need that month's subject matter. Let me
know your opinion on this.
With a small investment of your time, I believe this will be an excellent
vehicle to get (and keep) topics of interest and training in front of your
people.
I look forward to receiving your lists. Let me know if you have any
questions.
Greg
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
To those who do not have counsel (Ray, Greg, and Dave):
The company has retained Mike Levy with Swidler & Berlin to represent officers and employees subpoenaed in any of these investigations. Mike will be in the office next week. Please call me and I can set up a meeting (ext. 5-2402). In addition, Bob Bennett and Carl Rauh with Skadden and Britt Davis with the Enron Litigation Unit will be working on responding to these subpoenas.
Thank you for your cooperation.
-----Original Message-----
From: Zikes, Becky
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:50 PM
To: Lay, Kenneth; Williams, Robert C.; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Derrick Jr., James; Horton, Stanley; Koenig, Mark; Whalley, Greg; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Delainey, David W.; Haedicke, Mark E.; McMahon, Jeffrey; Olson, Cindy; Metts, Mark
Cc: Davis, Britt
Subject: Service of Congressional Subpoenas
Importance: High
Please be advised that a copy of a Congressional Subpoena issued January 9, 2002, and accepted for you by Robert S. Bennett on January 11, 2002 is being hand delivered to your office. In the event you are represent by counsel, please provide a copy of this Subpoena to your counsel.
Please be advised that responsive documents are due by February 1, 2002.
Becky Zikes
(713) 853-1843
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
For more information about accessories, useful add-on software, and replacement parts, please visit www.palm.net.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
You are enrolled in the following,
What: Working Styles
When: February 8, 2000
Where: EB560
Time: 1:00 - 5:00 pm (Please be prompt)
If you cannot attend, please let me know immediately.
Gracie
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Ray, I am not sure how this reasonable and prudent request could in any way be interpreted as a threat, and therefore do not understand. On the contrary, to sweep the accounts without the input of the Directors of these companies threatens the individuals with substantial personal liability. Further, to simply request the agreement of the three individuals who are the Directors of these companies is not onerous, and is consistent with their good faith attempts to discharge their fiduciary obligations as Directors. Unfortunately, these fiduciary obligations do not recognize the administrative efficiencies of Enron's cash management systems. If this remains unsatisfactory, please let me know by return.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bowen Jr., Raymond
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 5:34 PM
To: Keohane, Peter; Delainey, David W.; Lavorato, John; Milnthorp, Rob
Cc: Haedicke, Mark E.
Subject: FW: Debt Funding to Enron Corp.
Peter,
Be assured that I am extremely sensitive to the issues affecting board members in Canada. We also have similar issues in the UK. We will endeavor to communicate as best we can. However, all behavior with respect to your concerns must be practical in light of Enron's cash management systems. We cannot always hold a board of directors meeting in order to effect a wire transfer. I am choosing not to interpret your memo as some sort of threat, but as an effort to highlight a reasonable concern.
Regards,
Ray Bowen
-----Original Message-----
From: Crawford, Sharon On Behalf Of Keohane, Peter
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:01 PM
To: McMahon, Jeffrey; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Perkins, Mary
Cc: Delainey, David W.; Lavorato, John; Milnthorp, Rob
Subject: FW: Debt Funding to Enron Corp.
For similar reasons, no funds are to be withdrawn in the future from any of the bank accounts of Enron Energy Services Canada Corp. or Enron Direct Canada Corp. without first obtaining the consent of Dave Delainey, Rob Milnthorp and me, who are the Directors of those two companies.
-----Original Message-----
From: Crawford, Sharon On Behalf Of Keohane, Peter
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 9:45 AM
To: McMahon, Jeffrey; Bowen Jr., Raymond; Perkins, Mary
Subject: Debt Funding to Enron Corp.
Please see attached memo:
<< File: memo.bowen.debt funding to Enron Corp.doc >>
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Lizzie,
We have a new customer that needs the billing and payment address and contacts for the new gas purchase and sales contract that we are working on.
Can you please em-mail that information to:
[email protected]
when you have a minute.
Thank you very much
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Tana:
The following CPs are not authorized to trade US power products:
EEX Corporation - restricted by credit
Town of Braintree - trades through Braintree Power and Light
Vastar Resources, Inc. - not a current CP/not FERC approved
**********************
If Town of Braintree calls us about their power access, I'll talk to them --
I don't expect any comment, though.
Leslie
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I am going to copy Phillippe Bibi (Chief Technology Officer) and Cindy Olson
(EVP-HR). Please put someone in touch with Chris. Thanks
From: Chris Long 09/12/2000 04:09 PM
To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Maureen McVicker/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: ACTION ALERT -- ELECTRONIC MONITORING
Steve - Can you please direct me who in Houston should be notified about this
legislation...my guess is someone in HR.
Thanks - Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Stephen D Burns/Corp/Enron on 10/12/2000
02:14 PM ---------------------------
Larry Fineran <[email protected]> on 09/12/2000 02:06:44 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: ACTION ALERT -- ELECTRONIC MONITORING
URGENT ACTION REQUESTED
On Thursday, September 14, the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the House
Committee on the Judiciary is slated to consider H.R. 4908, the Notice of
Electronic Monitoring Act. H.R. 4908 is sponsored by Subcommittee Chairman
Charles Canady (R-FL-12) and cosponsored by subcommittee member Bob Barr
(R-GA-7). The bill would require employers to notify employees about
electronic monitoring. The National Association of Manufacturers urges its
members to notify their employees about internal monitoring practices.
Nevertheless, H.R. 4908 is being placed on a fast track that could allow for
many unintended consequences. The NAM urges you to contact the Subcommittee
on the Constitution at (202) 226-7680 and subcommittee members (see below)
to urge postponement.
Message:
The September 6 hearing on H.R. 4908 was not well advertised and did not
include the views and concerns of employers.
Because of the nature of computers and other electronic equipment, any
"electronic monitoring" bill has to be carefully written so that it does not
interfere with other fiduciary and legal responsibilities of employers.
This is far too important an issue to "rush through" the process.
For more information, call Larry Fineran at (202) 637-3174 or e-mail him at
[email protected].
Subcommittee Members:
Charles Canady (R-FL-12), Chair -- (202) 225-1252
Henry Hyde (R-IL-6) -- (202) 225-4561
Asa Hutchinson (R-AR-3) -- (202) 225-4301
Spencer Bachus (R-AL-6) -- (202) 225-4921
Bob Goodlatte (R-VA-6) -- (202) 225-5431
Bob Barr (R-GA-7) -- (202) 225-2931
William Jenkins (R-TN-1) -- (202) 225-6356
Lindsay Graham (R-SC-3) -- (202) 225-5301
Mel Watt (D-NC-12), Ranking Member -- (202) 225-1510
Maxine Waters (D-CA-35) -- (202) 225-2201
Barney Frank (D-MA-4) -- (202) 225-5931
John Conyers (D-MI-14) -- (202) 225-5126
Jerry Nadler (D-NY-8) -- (202) 225-5635
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Attached for your review and comment is the proposed TW handout for the CPUC workshop on gas infrastructure on Tues. April 17. I've been told by the Energy Division staff that with the significant amount of data they're expecting to receive during the workshop and with the expected interest/participation, Transwestern may not have an opportunity to speak. However, they have encouraged us to produce any handouts we'd like to distribute on Tuesday.
Since I'm out of the office on Monday, please call me and leave me a voice mail message indicating whether changes or modifications to the handout are needed. If so, please return email your changes and I'll stop by Monday before I leave and incorporate them into the handout. If not, I'll ask Audrey to prepare approx. 80 copies that I'll pick-up on my way to the airport Monday p.m. Thank you.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
December 1, 2000
Teco Tap 35.000 / Enron ; 105.625 / HPL IFERC
December 2, 2000
Teco Tap 30.000 / Enron ; 120.000 / HPL IFERC
December 3, 2000
Teco Tap 30.000 / Enron ; 120.000 / HPL IFERC
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I'm there.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Power Indices - IntercontentalExchange
IntercontinentalExchange
Firm Power Price Bulletin
For Power Delivered on Monday, November 19, 2001
(Trade Date of Friday, November 16, 2001)
Click here to access index history
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
current 5170
tenn -6 200
ny -4 200
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Stinson,
N o problem.
Vince
Stinson Gibner
01/07/2000 10:51 AM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Shirley Crenshaw/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melissa Jones/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications, Zimin Lu/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jean Mrha/Enron Communications@Enron
Communications
Subject: Stinson vacation in Feb.
Vince:
I would like to take four days of vacation time in February, from Feb. 22
through 25th.
thanks,
--Stinson
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I quickly reviewed the draft and didn't see anything troubling about it. I'll defer to Greg on whether its OK from Legal's perspective as my review was brief. Gracias. DF
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Jeff,
We have been working to try and get the crude products available in yen, but have not had much luck after Darren left. You can see the general summary of the situation below. We'd like to get the product up and believe that with some basic publicity it could be quite successful. Any ideas on how to overcome these points?
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: Anai, Rousseau
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 12:08 PM
To: Hirl, Joseph
Subject: FW: George Update - FX
-----Original Message-----
From: Anai, Rousseau
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 5:42 PM
To: Hirl, Joseph
Cc: Bekeng, Jan-Erland
Subject: George Update - FX
Joe
After spending some time with Houston and London people over the past 2 weeks, the conclusion is that George cannot be up and running within the next 2-3 months. Obtaining live FX quotes is the major issue. Options that we considered were:
(a) Connect up to a bank's FX online system
Shane Dallman (UK) identified potential issues with this, the main one being technical issues associated with the EOL application. After consulting with EOL people, it appears the FX manager application is not suitable for linking to an external party at the moment. They are working on these issues as part of a larger development project but I cannot get a clear timetable out of them
(b) Get Thomas Cheng to run the FX manager
Issues include:
* Thomas doesn't feel comfortable having to watch the FX market on a real time basis and update prices accordingly, given most of his time is spent on metals
* In that case, FX group would like automatic updates of the FX price from the market so he would not have to watch it all the time (we then get back to IT issues which Shane is checking out)
(c) Get a FX trader in Japan
The FX group is currently considering their staffing requirements but Pushkar Shahi (Director, FX Houston) said that there are no immediate plans to get someone out here.
I will keep monitoring the FX situation. Perhaps if you have time next week, you could speak to Gary Hickerson to get his thoughts.
Regards
Rousseau
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
In anticipation of potential litigation involving TW's operational
activities, please prepare an analysis for me of the reasons for TW's sale of
excess natural gas at the California border. I am aware of several of these
sales and have been informed that excess pressure at the border is the basic
reason for them. I'd like a more specific explanation that includes the
following information:
1. What are the specific pressures and volume considerations that could make
it operationally necessary to sell gas at the California border?
2. What is the process that is followed to make such a determination?
3. Which individuals or groups are involved in determining whether an
operational sale is necessary?
4. In what way have system operations changed since last year and how do
those changes contribute to the increased frequency of such sales compared to
previous years?
5. What alternatives to operational sales are considered before the decision
to make a sale is reached?
Thanks for your attention to this request. Please give me a call to discuss
and please designate your response as "Privileged and Confidential, Attorney
Client Privileged."
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Great!! DF
From: Paul Cherry 02/13/2001 11:23 AM
To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: PG & E Creditworthiness
Drew,
I received a call from my contact at PG &E and they have accepted our
changes. With your approval we will clean up the draft and get Rod to execute
and forward to PG & E for their execution.
Thanks.
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Cherry/GPGFIN/Enron on 02/13/2001
11:21 AM ---------------------------
From: Paul Cherry 02/06/2001 02:39 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: Ted Chavez/GPGFIN/Enron@ENRON
Subject: PG & E Creditworthiness
Chris,
I have attached our most recent revisions to the Letter Agreement.
I will be out of town Wednesday and Thursday returning Friday.
If you need assistance, please contact my associate, Ted Chavez at
713-853-7952.
Regards.
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Start Date: 4/13/01; HourAhead hour: 12; No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041312.txt
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
Details: (Hour: 12 / Preferred: 20.00 / Final: 19.97)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTRT
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/13/01
TIE_POINT: FCORNR_5_PSUEDO
INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_BUNNY
ENGY_TYPE: FIRM
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Stinson,
No problem.
Vince
Stinson Gibner
02/15/2001 06:41 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Vacation in March, April
Vince,
If possible I would like to take some vacation time in March and April.
Specifically the week of HISD spring break, which is March 12-16. Also, I
would like to take March 21-30.
Please let me know if this is OK.
Regards,
Stinson
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Hi Charlotte,
Just confirming that you will be picking Michael up today, and I will pick
him up at your place around 615. He has clean clothes to change into.
Thanks,
Kay
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
I've got Bilas's "winter of discontent." What a buffoon. It takes more guts
than a train robber to, on one hand, propose a spineless, ineffective
approach to dealing with what are now recognized as serious flaws in the
current regulatory structure, and in the same breath, go to the court of
public opinion and whine about a gas market spinning madly out of control.
Apparently, he's also setting the table for possible intervention in the
market by state lawmakers or regulators if we get any more "out of whack."
Are you going over to see Bilas today with Mike Day, et al.? Are we to
assume by Bilas's wishy-washy statements to the media that the Comprehensive
Settlement is still on the table? Thoughts, please.
Natural Gas Intelligence, Wednesday, December 6, 2000
CA Officials See Potential Gas Supply Problems
Some state officials already are dubbing the upcoming heating season as
California's "winter of discontent" as continued high wholesale natural gas
prices are driving up consumer bills and state regulators look at options for
unbundling Southern California Gas Co.'s transmission and storage system.
According to other state energy officials he talks with, Richard Bilas,
commissioner at the California Public Utilities Commission, said, "We could
have some real problems." Bilas, the former energy commissioner and
immediate-past president of the CPUC, has proposed a modest unbundling of
SoCalGas' system, given the current energy price volatility, in a proposed
settlement decision now being reviewed. Action on the proposed decision could
come Dec. 21, but observers predict alternate orders will be offered by some
of Bilas's colleagues on the five-member CPUC, and that could push into next
year final action.
If gas prices continue at their precedent-setting levels, California likely
will be intervening at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as it already
has been doing regarding last summer's electricity price spikes, Bilas said.
"There are a lot of things the state can do, but whether they are done is a
matter of philosophical and political judgment," he said. "If gas prices get
totally out whack in the view of a number of state decision-makers, there is
likely to be intervention on behalf of the state into gas pricing. And I
don't know if any of that serves the public well in the long run, but this is
a short-run political problem."
As for his proposed decision on settlement for the unbundling of the
SoCalGas's system, Bilas is unsure at this point if it will stimulate a more
robust core aggregation market --- now almost a decade old --- with added
volumes and marketers. He said he needs to hear from participants in the
market in response to the proposed decision, which basically adopts the more
modest compromise of three different settlements filed with the CPUC.
"I'll know better where this proposed decision is going in another two weeks
after I have talked with the other commissioners and some of the parties,"
said Bilas, noting that the pending gas settlements should be the last major
changes in California's gas market for awhile, unless the state legislature
decides to get involved as it has on several occasions in the past three
years.
"Everything to do with gas matters statewide is on the table and I am not
going to make any predictions," Bilas said during a telephone interview in
which he expressed concerns about both natural gas and electricity issues in
California in the coming year. He said the supply-demand imbalance for the
state's electricity market needs long-term solutions, but he thinks
short-term political answers will win out.
Bilas said the recent state energy commission conclusion that California's
electricity needs can be met with the existing plants underway or proposed
could pan out, but only if an unlikely combination of three factors converge:
all the plants now on the drawing board actually get built, no major electric
or gas transmission bottlenecks occur, and energy prices stabilize.
"Even if all of the proposed plants came on line in two years rather than
three, I think we still would have problems," he said. "Let's face it, demand
for electricity in the Pacific Northwest and California is growing like
crazy. So, until there is something done on the demand side, so we get some
demand responsiveness, just attacking the supply side I don't think is going
to do it."
|
{
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.