text
stringlengths 1
1.59M
| meta
dict |
|---|---|
As part of our Accounts Receivable/Accounts Payable audit, we worked with
Julia Murray in order to obtain the applicable Statute of Limitations in
which the different commodities should review their AR/AP balances for
potential write-off amounts. Based on our communications with legal, we
have aggregated the following Statute of Limitation timeframes for the
following jurisdictions. Please review this information and based upon
your knowledge, update us on any differences or changes to which you are
aware.
Statutes of Limitations
Texas 2 or 4 years (A)
New Jersey 6 years
New York 6 years
Alberta 2 years
Quebec 3 years
Ontario 6 years (B)
England 6 years (C)
Delaware 3 years
(Embedded image moved to file: pic02995.pcx)
As we are in the process of closing out our AR/AP audit, your attention to
this matter would be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions or
need clarification, please call met at x6-6335 or Sharon Smith at x6-6209.
Thank you.
Tatiana
*******************Internet Email Confidentiality Footer*******************
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
- pic02995.pcx | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 12/21/2000
05:33 PM ---------------------------
Li Sun@ENRON
12/21/2000 01:36 PM
To: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Total Return Swap
Hi, Vince,
Please see attached the updated Total Return Swap deals.
All the best!
Li | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
It was actually Stuart Zisman.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dobler, Mark
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 8:25 AM
To: Presto, Kevin M.
Subject: RE: Our favorite of them all
I'd be putting Don Miller up for "Eskimo ice cream salesman" of the year!
From: Kevin M Presto/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/29/2001 07:20 AM
To: Mark Dobler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: RE: Our favorite of them all
Can you believe Duke paid book value. Wow! They even accepted all the risk associated with the Power Systems BS.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dobler, Mark
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 7:01 PM
To: Delainey, David; Pagan, Ozzie; Bob Virgo@ENRON; Kevin M Presto/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Our favorite of them all
I honestly never thought I'd see the day when ol' New Albany was in the rear view mirror............
Enron Corp (ENE) (48.34 +1.62)
DUKE ENERGY CORP. said it agreed to buy a 400-megawatt natural
gas-fired power plant in Mississippi from ENRON CORP. subsidiary
Enron North America. The sale is expected to close in early
October 2001, Duke Energy said in a statement. The company
declined to disclose the terms of the sale.
(Reuters 02:35 PM ET 06/28/2001) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Vince,
I appreciate your inquiry regarding an extra spot in the summer associate
pool. I am looking forward to hearing from you soon.
Best regards,
---------oOOo-----oOOo----------
Cantekin Dincerler
Doctoral Candidate
The University of Texas at Austin
Graduate School of Business
Department of Finance
office: (512) 471-1676
fax : (512) 471-5073
home : (512) 472-5356
http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~cantekin
-------------oooO-----Oooo----------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince J Kaminski [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 8:34 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Vince J Kaminski; Vasant Shanbhogue
> Subject: Re: summer internship
>
>
>
>
> Cantekin,
>
> The summer associate program has closed but I shall check to see
> if I can get one extra place.
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Cantekin Dincerler" <[email protected]> on 03/28/2000
> 11:48:53 AM
>
> Please respond to [email protected]
>
> To: [email protected]
> cc: (bcc: Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT)
> Subject: summer internship
>
>
>
> Hi Vince,
>
> I am writing you at this time to inquire as to the potential
> of renewing my
> internship at Enron for the Summer of 2000.
>
> While the date of my request is later than I would have
> wished, the reason
> is that I had originally planned to go back to Turkey this
> summer and get
> my mandatory military duty done. However, I now realize I can
> put it off to
> a further date. That left me wondering if you believe there
> is a project
> that I can get involved in this summer and be useful. If that were the
> case, I would be more than happy to postpone my military duty
> and spend the
> summer with the research group. I discussed this with Dr.
> Ronn, and he is
> very supportive of this idea.
>
> I apologize again for bringing up this issue late, and look forward to
> hearing from you.
>
> Best regards,
>
> ---------oOOo-----oOOo----------
> Cantekin Dincerler
>
> Doctoral Candidate
> The University of Texas at Austin
> Graduate School of Business
> Department of Finance
> office: (512) 471-1676
> fax : (512) 471-5073
> home : (512) 472-5356
> http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~cantekin
> -------------oooO-----Oooo----------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
05:59 PM ---------------------------
Kathy Mayfield
12/13/2000 05:02 PM
To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift
---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Mayfield/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000
04:38 PM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 12/13/2000 04:34:58 PM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift
Thank you for the Charity Gift Card. I decided to donate the gift to the
Depelchin Children's Center. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: Kapoor, Sumant
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:08 AM
To: Arora, Harry
Subject: Chemist Request in Delhi
Hi Harry,
The Chemist in Delhi (Kuber Chemist ) has requested for the phone number for New Jersey address. I presume that is required by the courier service in India. He also mentions that the medicines will take about a week to arrive from the date of departure.
Regards,
Sumant | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
no problem. Likewise, I would like to be kept in touch with what you guys are up to as well.
Thanks,
Doug
-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:45 AM
To: Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject: FW: FW: UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs
Doug --
Please do not send anything out to the PUC until my team has reviewed.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Presto, Kevin M.
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Steffes, James D.; Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject: RE: FW: UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs
OK - Doug can have Smith Day and Jeff Miller work to get the retail certification.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 3:11 PM
To: Presto, Kevin M.; Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject: RE: FW: UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs
We need to have everything in 30 days. I know that.
The question is given everything else - FERC MBR, gas pipelines, PJM, etc. - isn't it better to move into ERCOT at the wholesale level and then come back after getting the rest of the market moving along?
From a resource standpoint, I need to understand how to get PUCT counsel for UBS to start the REP process anyway.
JIm
-----Original Message-----
From: Presto, Kevin M.
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:47 PM
To: Steffes, James D.; Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject: RE: FW: UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs
We need it w/in the first 30 days.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steffes, James D.
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:33 AM
To: Presto, Kevin M.; Gilbert-smith, Doug
Subject: Re: FW: UBS Sign-Off on ERCOT Docs
But do we need it immediately? Can we file later for retail authority?
--------------------------
Jim Steffes
Enron | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here's what's happening on the QF negotiations through the Treasury Dept.
----- Forwarded by Susan J Mara/NA/Enron on 01/16/2001 11:11 AM -----
"Steven Kelly" <[email protected]>
01/15/2001 07:50 PM
Please respond to "Steven Kelly"
To: "Wayne Kawamoto" <[email protected]>, "Ward Scobee"
<[email protected]>, "Tony Wetzel" <[email protected]>,
"Thomas Heller" <[email protected]>, "Steve Ponder" <[email protected]>,
"Steve Iliff" <[email protected]>, "Ross Ain" <[email protected]>,
"Robert Frees" <[email protected]>, "Pete Levitt" <[email protected]>, "Paula
Soos" <[email protected]>, "Paul Wood"
<[email protected]>, "Nam Nguyen" <[email protected]>, "Milt
Schultz" <[email protected]>, "Marty McFadden"
<[email protected]>, "Ken Salvagno" <[email protected]>, "Ken
Hoffman" <[email protected]>, "Jonathan Weisgall"
<[email protected]>, "Joe Ronan" <[email protected]>, "Joe Greco"
<[email protected]>, "Jack Pigott" <[email protected]>, "Hap Boyd"
<[email protected]>, "Frank Misseldine" <[email protected]>,
"Ed Tomeo" <[email protected]>, "Ed Maddox"
<[email protected]>, "Duane Nelsen" <[email protected]>, "Doug
Levitt" <[email protected]>, "Doug Fernley" <[email protected]>, "Dean
Gosselin" <[email protected]>, "Bob Escalante"
<[email protected]>, "Bob Ellery" <[email protected]>, "Bill
Woods" <[email protected]>, "Bill Carlson" <[email protected]>, "Bill Adams"
<[email protected]>, "Alex Sugaoka" <[email protected]>, "Lucian Fox"
<[email protected]>, "Rich Dyer" <[email protected]>, "Ted
Cortopassi" <[email protected]>, "William Hall"
<[email protected]>, "Sue Mara" <[email protected]>, "Roger Pelote"
<[email protected]>, "Rob Lamkin" <[email protected]>, "Kent
Palmerton" <[email protected]>, "Jeff Dasovich"
<[email protected]>, "Greg Blue" <[email protected]>, "Eric Eisenman"
<[email protected]>, "Curt Hatton" <[email protected]>, "Cody
Carter" <[email protected]>, "Carolyn Baker"
<[email protected]>, "Mark Smith" <[email protected]>
cc: "Jan Smutny-Jones" <[email protected]>, "Katie Kaplan" <[email protected]>,
"Carol Hudson" <[email protected]>, "Steven Kelly" <[email protected]>, "Andy
Brown" <[email protected]>, "Doug Kerner" <[email protected]>, "Kent Burton"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Fw: PG&E QF Forbearance and Energy Pricing Principles
Attached are the PG&E QF Forbearance and energy pricing principles developed
in the PG&E/QF-Gas Working Group. This principles will be discussed
tomorrow, Tuesday;
----- Original Message -----
From: Diane Fellman <[email protected]>
To: Carol Hudson (E-mail) <[email protected]>; Steven Kelly (E-mail)
<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 7:55 PM
Subject: FW: PG&E QF Forbearance and Energy Pricing Principles
> Dear Carol,
>
> Steven asked me to forward this to you. He asked to forward this to the
> Restructuring Task Force and the QF Contract Task Force. Call him on his
> cell phone if you have any questions.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Diane I. Fellman
> Energy Law Group LLP
> 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2700
> Oakland, CA 94612
> Telephone: (415)703-6000
> Facsimile: (415)703-6001
> email: [email protected]
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manheim, William (Law) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 7:21 PM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: FW: PG&E QF Forbearance and Energy Pricing Principles
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Alcantar [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 7:16 PM
> To: Kugelman, Richard; Hapner, Dede; Manheim, William (Law); Reid, Alice
> (Law); Steve Greenwald
> Cc: Joe Karp; Doug Kerner; Jerry Bloom; Evelyn Kahl Elsesser; James A.
> Ross
> Subject: PG&E QF Forbearance and Energy Pricing Principles
>
>
> Attached is our draft for further discussion. The draft is in
> Wordperfect format.
>
>
>
- 01-15-01 PG&E & QF Energy Pricing Principles for DC Summit.wpd | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Alan Kurzer, President
TFS Energy, LLC
680 Wahsington Blvd.
Stamford, CT 06901
203-351-1590
[email protected]
Thanks,
-Dan
x39673 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
gngr
713-853-7751
----- Forwarded by Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron on 05/11/2001 01:13 PM -----
Sarah Novosel
05/11/2001 12:34 PM
To: Ginger Dernehl/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Supreme Court Briefs
Ginger:
Would you please circulate the attached briefs to the Government Affairs
group as an FYI. These are Enron's briefs filed in the Supreme Court case
regarding FERC's Order No. 888 open access proceeding.
Thanks
Sarah | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is the draft letter in .doc (Word) format, as indicated in the
previous email. Thanks, Rae
- req for comments for DOE meeting.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Howard, Kevin A.
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 12:57 PM
To: Harris, Steven
Subject: Call at 1:15
I will call you at your office and patch in Yuan. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
PGE is currently working on a problem with the inability to call international numbers. If you need to make an international call you can use 10 10 555 then the number. For example: 10 10 555 011 44 207 375 8762
If you have any questions give Chip a call at x8916. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Alan, here is a link to the Interim Settlement. Mike Day
-----Original Message-----
From: Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 5:23 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: FW: Report on meeting with Comm. Bilas re GIR Proposed Decision
Mike, per your telephone request for an electronic version of the Interim
Settlement.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sullivan, Glen J.
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 8:31 AM
To: Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL
Cc: Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW
Subject: RE: Report on meeting with Comm. Bilas re GIR Proposed Decision
Here is the link to the PUC's website that has posted on it electronic
versions of the Interim, Post-Interim, and Comprehensive, including
appendices.
http://nic.cpuc.ca.gov/gas_strategy/r9907003/docs.htm
<http://nic.cpuc.ca.gov/gas_strategy/r9907003/docs.htm>
-- Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 6:33 PM
To: Sullivan, Glen J.
Cc: Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW
Subject: RE: Report on meeting with Comm. Bilas re GIR Proposed Decision
Glen, do you have an electronic copy of the Interim Settlement? Mike Day is
looking for one and I only have a hard copy.
I talked with both Mike Day and Mark Pocta today (both of which called
me)and have some further insights. I will call you tomorrow to discuss.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sullivan, Glen J.
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 4:21 PM
To: Freeman, Kimberly; Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW; Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL
Subject: FW: Report on meeting with Comm. Bilas re GIR Proposed Decision
I'm not going to hunt to see if you were copied, I'm just forwarding it.
So, who's the 4th Commissioner??
-- Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: MBD [ mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 3:41 PM
To: 'Pocta, Robert M.'; 'Counihan, Rick'; '[email protected]';
'John Burkholder'; 'Mike Alexander'; 'Craig Chancellor'; 'Colin
Cushnie'; 'Jeff Dasovich'; MBD; 'Paul Amirault'; 'Doug Porter'; 'Tom
Beach'; 'Amirault, Paul'; 'Craig Chancellor, Calpine'; 'How-Downing,
Lindsey'; 'Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary'; '[email protected]'; 'Jeff
Fawcett, Transwestern'; 'Michael Rochman'; 'Rick Counihan,
Greenmountain.com'; Bayless, David@Utility; Dingwall, Brian@UEM;
Elsesser, Evelyn@aelaw; Johnson, Pamela@REMAC; Jun, Christine@aelaw;
Karp, Joseph@Whitecase; McCrea, Keith@CIG/CM; Paul, Joe@Dynegy; Pocta,
Mark@ORA; Scott, Susan@TW; Worster, Gerard@TXU; Wright, Gillian -
TP1GXW; Sullivan, Glen J.; 'Angeles, Zenee G. - TPZGA'
Subject: Report on meeting with Comm. Bilas re GIR Proposed Decision
This communication is intended for signatories of the Comprehensive
Settlement Agreement, and is confidential under Rule 51 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure. Please do not forward this e-mail to other
parties.
During a meeting with Comm. Bilas today, he confirmed what we had been
previously advised, namely: He did not communicate with any of his
colleagues regarding the PD, he is very disappointed at the limited scope of
the PD, and knows it does not go as far as it should; he would support an
alternate offered by another commission which adopted more or all of the
CSA. He strongly urges parties to take their concerns about the PD to the
other commissioners. He acknowledges it will be a tough sell. However, he
does not have any communication from the Democratic commissioners on this
issue either way, so he cannot predict their reaction with any certainty.
The main reason for his issuance of the PD in this form appears to be that
he felt that a more aggressive PD issued by a Wilson appointee would attract
attacks simply because it was not offered by the new commissioner.
Additional data points: Other key CPUC staff with access to President Lynch
that I spoke with today urged us to meet with her, and to emphasize that the
CSA does not result in a reduction in CPUC jurisdiction or regulatory
control (like AB 1890 did) and to take our best shot at convincing her and
Comm. Wood that customers, including core customers, may far much worse
under the interim than under the CSA (particularly in view of the interstate
capacity issues--as described by Mark Pocta of ORA on our recent conf.
call). In addition, a fourth Commissioner (who will be around to vote next
year) suggested similar tactics and offered support for such an effort.
In light of this information, I suggest that we proceed to issue the letter
as planned, and ask that all parties, including SoCalGas, quickly review the
next draft to see if they can sign on. We would like to have as many of the
CSA signatories as possible on the letter. I hope to get the new draft out
today or early tomorrow. Please respond by COB Thursday or early on Friday.
Next, I have asked for a meeting with Pres. Lynch. I would like other
parties to attend as well (or schedule their own meetings). As soon as I
get a date, I will advise.
Bottom line: We urge parties to sign the letter and to file comments
supporting adoption of the CSA. We need to meet with Lynch, and until and
unless we get a firm "no", we should not assume the settlement is dead. We
should file comments on the PD on Monday which at least list our objections
to the PD and open the door for discussions on how to revive the CSA.
If possible, we will try to arrange a conference call on Friday.
Please call if you have any questions.
Mike Day | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Lee, after I put in the deals, the system went down and I was not able to get
them to calc. So they are not in these numbers. They will be tonight. See
you guys later today.
DG | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Robin,
Actually, the relocation department will give you the option to receive the
funds by credit card, check, or wire. You will not have to submit an expense
report.
Thanks,
ib
Robin Rodrigue@ECT
02/23/2001 09:05 AM
To: Ivonne Brown/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: Relocation to Chicago
Ivonne,
Thanks for the information. Will I receive the $3,500 automatically on my
paycheck, or do I need to submit an expense report to be reimbursed for any
expenses I incur? If I do need to submit an expense report, who should I
turn it in to?
Thanks,
Robin
Enron North America Corp.
From: Ivonne Brown @ ENRON 02/23/2001 08:56 AM
To: Robin Rodrigue/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Relocation to Chicago
Robin,
You will be receiving a cost-of-living adjustment of 20% when you relocate to
Chicago plus an additional $1,000 per month. In addition, we will provide
relocation assistance for your household goods and car transportation.
Allowance
$3,500 will cover expenses which are outside the movement of your household
goods. (This amount is before taxes.)
Household goods move
Option 1 - Full service of household goods
Option 2 - Self move / $1,500 (This amount is before taxes.)
Please let me know if you need additional information.
Thanks,
Ivonne Brown | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
How did the pattened move work?
cd | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We need to keep in mind the 30 day deadline to provide notice. We don't want
to give them any room to wiggle. We can always send another notice later.
Kay
Enron North America Corp.
From: Mark Dobler 07/28/2000 11:48 AM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL
Mitch/Kay -
I would include reference to two (2) major issues, the one stated on the unit
non-performance at varying ambient temperatures and second being excessive
vibration. The rest of the letter looks fine.
MSD
Enron North America Corp.
From: Mitch Robinson 07/28/2000 11:09 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Mark Dobler/NA/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL
Kay -
Not yet. I wanted to wrap up the repairs on unit 1 first to see if we should
add that to the mix. Now that Mark is back, I'd like him (vice Mike Miller)
to be the signer.
Mark, thoughts on the attached?
Mitch
Enron North America Corp.
From: Kay Mann 07/28/2000 11:02 AM
To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL
Mitch,
Has the letter gone out?
Kay
From: Richard B Sanders@ECT on 07/23/2000 09:24 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL
If this letter has not yet gone out, we should include the kitchen sink of
perceived problems. I agree that the letter should be short, but lets
eliminate their argument that we did not give complete notice.
Kay Mann@ENRON
07/13/2000 12:13 PM
To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL
Mitch,
Here's a first draft. Please suggest any additional complaints/shortfalls
which we need to raise. It is better to be all inclusive than leave
something out.
Richard, any ideas or comments?
Kay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Modified to include $40 per transaction for the pipelines.
Dave | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 4/18/01; HourAhead hour: 15; No ancillary schedules awarded. No
variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041815.txt | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/15/2000 11:39 AM -----
Karen Denne
11/14/2000 04:20 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J
Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: GOVERNOR DAVIS CALLS ON FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION TO
ORDER CONSUMER
fyi... transcript of Gov. Davis' remarks in San Diego today.
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 11/14/2000
04:19 PM ---------------------------
"sandra" <[email protected]> on 11/14/2000 04:02:48 PM
Please respond to "Sandra Yamane" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, [email protected],
[email protected]
cc:
Subject: GOVERNOR DAVIS CALLS ON FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION TO
ORDER CONSUMER
- GOVERNOR DAVIS CALLS ON FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION TO ORDER
CONSUMER REFUNDS AND PRICE CAPS.htm | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks for the update. Just want to add that 1) if we're uneasy about
wearing the full requirements risk, then focusing on offering a purely
wholesale deal can still be very attractive, given SDG&E's blunders w.r.t.
procurment wholesale power on behalf of its customers. And 2) the CPUC has
been beat up pretty well for tying the IOUs hands in attempting to hedge, so
they'll be subject to a considerable amount of pressure to pre-approve if a
deal is offered that can be show to shield San Diegans from volatility and
that looks"attractive."
Appreciate being kept in the loop on the details. Thanks.
Best,
Jeff
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Greg Wolfe/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
Subject: Re: SDG&E Requirements Deal
J
I think we could get below $60 on a 5 year deal with a bell shaped load
profile at SP-15. I do not think we can get there for the SDG&E zone. In
fact, I don't think Tim will want to sell the SDG&E zone at all. If we offer
it, it will be at a significant premium to SP-15.
We just showed SCE $58 for a 5 year peak (By the way, like the SDG&E RFP, the
SCE RFP resulted in no transactions because they did not get pre-approved
reasonableness review and they were too chicken to do it at shareholder
risk. The PG&E RFP for essentially the same deal structure is due tomorrow
and we will be responding. With the PG&E RFP, prices can be changed oon
October 11 so the prices we will show them now are indicative only).
Get me that load profile data and I will put together a deal structure. I
wil also be working with the traders to address this "new zone" issue as it
exists for all three utilities, not just SDG&E.
C
James D Steffes@EES
09/12/2000 07:39 AM
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: thane twiggs
Subject: SDG&E Requirements Deal
Chris --
I agree with you on the difficulty of a "true" full requirements deal. I
assume what you are talking about is some pre-agreed to 100% load factor
energy delivery that could be different for each hour during the year (a sort
of "load profile solution"). SDG&E would be responsible for +/- around this
delivery? Maybe offer SDG&E an option on wide variations.
The other key issue I guess that is important is transmission congestion
risk. Would EPMI be willing to agree to deliver the energy into the SDG&E
load zone or just to SP15? It is my understanding that there is a
significant economic difference the SP15 and specific load zones? Am I
correct in my thinking?
We probably need to beat $60/Mwh and leave $5/Mwh for the load following. We
may need to go even lower (if possible) to give SDG&E room to recover this
summer's high cost of power with the retroactive retail ratemaking back
through July 1, 2000.
On your issue of CPUC approval, that is exactly the play. We need to walk
into the CPUC with an offer that it can't pass up (with or without SDG&E).
I've asked Thane Twiggs to get you the appropriate 8760 load profile for
SDG&E residential customers. While the rate deal was broader, we could just
supply this customer group.
I'll call when we have the information.
Jim
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES
cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: SDG&E Bilateral Authority Delay
Jim:
A couple thoughts...
I don't think Tim would be interested in a true "Full Requirements" deal that
would put us at risk for actual load. If we could define "Full Requirements"
as a load profile that has been set ahead of time, and have SDG&E be at risk
for deviations from that profile, then I think we would be interested. With
this structure, we could offer a fixed price equal to the weighted average
price of their load profile. If that fixed price was lower than the SDG&E
embedded generation cost in rates we might have an angle. "Winning" such a
deal still seems like a pretty low probability event, given SDG&E's desire to
RFP everything. However, SDG&E's (and SCE's) main objective seems to be
pre-approved reasonableness review. Since they can't make money on
commodity, at least they don't want to lose money. Maybe we could get the
approval of the CPUC? SDG&E wouldn't mind buying from us if this is what it
took to get pre-approved reasonableness review.
If someone could get me that load profile information, I would be willing to
price it up.
Let me know what you think.
C
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000
01:09 PM ---------------------------
James D Steffes@EES
09/11/2000 01:12 PM
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, David
Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES, Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron,
Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Richard Shapiro/HOU/EES@EES
Subject: Re: SDG&E Bilateral Authority Delay
Chris --
Given this development, now may be the right time for Enron to come in and
make a "public" offer to SDG&E. We may be able to put some pressure on the
CPUC to approve a full requirements offer that works with the legislative
rate cap.
I'll be in contact with you to discuss.
Jim
To: James D Steffes/HOU/EES@EES, Christopher F Calger/PDX/ECT@ECT, Tim
Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/SFO/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: SDG&E Bilateral Authority Delay
Surprise, surprise.
SDG&E is afraid to do anything without the pre-approved reasonableness from
the CPUC which I don't think will be obtained.
Chris
Chris
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT on 09/11/2000
05:59 AM ---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: "Firooz, Sharon" <[email protected]>
09/08/2000 05:32 PM
To: "Hart, Dana" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: SDG&E Bilateral Authority Delay
SDG&E would like to inform you that we did not gain authority from the
commission on 9/7 and cannot enter into bilateral trades at present; (2) we
anticipate receiving that approval on September 21; we will solicit new
proposals between now and then and look forward to your continuing
participation, as well as your assistance in gaining the necessary
regulatory approvals. Thanks | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Chris Germany is responsible for all the retail volume. I was only given
Dayton STORAGE positions to book. If there are other dayton positions I do
not have them.
Mark
x36446
---------------------- Forwarded by Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99 11:57
AM ---------------------------
Tricia Bowen
12/27/99 10:54 AM
To: Mark Friedman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: JANUARY 2000 NEEDS
HELP!!
Kathy just received these retail volumes from CES for a number of pipes.
The Texas gas deals at the end of this email are nowhere in sitara. Are
these deals suppose to be entered by Chris since they are "retail" or is the
Dayton Power and Light deal suppose to be entered by you guys under that
Desk? Are you guys done entering the Dayton Desk deals??
Thanks
Trish
---------------------- Forwarded by Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99 10:49 AM
---------------------------
From: Katherine L Kelly 12/27/99 10:12 AM
To: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dan Junek/HOU/ECT@ECT, Judy
Townsend/HOU/ECT@ECT, George Smith/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward Terry/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Tricia Bowen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victor Lamadrid/HOU/ECT@ECT, Beverly
Beaty/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita K Patton/HOU/ECT@ECT, Victoria Versen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Meredith Mitchell/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jesse Villarreal/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: JANUARY 2000 NEEDS
I just received this memo from Phil at CES. It appears to be from their
retail group in Pittsburgh. I'm looking into this, but from what I'm hearing
we are supplying this gas to the retail group and need to make sure that it
is scheduled. Please check on these immediatly since the LDC deadlines start
today.
---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT on 12/27/99
10:08 AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 12/27/99 09:29:42 AM
To: Katherine L Kelly/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: JANUARY 2000 NEEDS
Here is some more info concerning 1/1/2000.
Phil
---------------------- Forwarded by Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas on
12/27/99
09:35 AM ---------------------------
KIM NOVSEK BIZIK
12/27/99 08:43 AM
To: Morgan Sharifi/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Dale Ray
East/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Phil Villagomez/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Darren Espey/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc: Marianne Stiles/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Joanne
Swogger/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Noel Bartlo/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas,
Paul Drexelius/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
Subject: JANUARY 2000 NEEDS
Good Morning. I have listed my needs below for all but Peco.
The red can be off Anr or Tgt. Please advise.
The green is done - just need the activity number.
I have also included my nom deadline - I have a nom due today - LILCO. Please
advise.
ANR
CG&E- deliveries to Springboro 1550 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is
12:30 on the 30th - note this can be served off TGT
Tetco
BUG 145 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the
29th
Con Ed 261 dth/day (estimate ONLY) LDC Nom Deadline is 2
pm on the 30th
PECO
PA Gas
PSEG 1696 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 10 pm on the 29th
Etown 23 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the
29th
NJN 7528 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 12:30 est on
the 30th
CNG - PA gas for PECO /day (If we have a problem flowing this much,
please let me know as soon as possible so we can buy delivered gas to PECO's
gate from one of the other suppliers)
Transco
LILCO 382 dth/day (capacity release is also for
382) LDC Nom Deadline is noon on the 27th
PSEG 189 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 10 pm on the
29th
S Jersey 113 dth/day Transco nom must show Enduser # 012224 to
be confirmed- LDC Deadline is 12:30 on the 30th
Piedmont 1113 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline was 10:30 est on
the 22nd - just need activity number now
PSNC 190 dth/day (CES will get the capacity release for
this from PSNC)
The supply will be from PSNC's pool #7620 (this is
their station 85 pool)
Texas Gas
DP&L 1298 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is
12:30 est on the 30th
CG&E 1550 dth/day LDC Nom Deadline is 12:30 on
the 30th - note this can be served off TGT | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please check your calendars as soon as possible and let me know if
Wednesday, February 16th will work for our Off Site Meeting. We will have
lunch at 11:30 and begin the meeting at approximately 1:00. We are planning
to have cocktails around 5:00 pm.
Tentative reservations have already been made for this day so PLEASE RSVP
back this morning.
Thank you!
Yvette
x3.5953 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: Shapiro, Richard
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 5:48 PM
To: Kean, Steven J.
Subject: FW:
didnt keep it
-----Original Message-----
From: Shapiro, Richard
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 5:48 PM
To: Kean, Steven J.
Subject:
Did you have Bob Long's resume? | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Wednesday, April 25 at 10 a.m. Houston time, join Sherri Sera, executive
assistant to Jeff Skilling, on eSpeak. Sherri will answer questions about
how her job has changed since Jeff became CEO.
If you can't make the live event, post your questions on eSpeak now. Sherri
will answer them during her eSpeak, and you can find the answers in the
transcript later.
Have you been wondering what happened to the information about Enron's
severance pay policy? Would you like to see an innovation suggestion for
the Saturn's ring that will connect the two Enron buildings? Read the new
postings in the "Office of the Chairman" category in eMeet.
Thanks for the great response to the new "Cost Reduction" category in the
Idea Vault! Visit the ThinkBank today and read the suggestions for cutting
costs; and, while you're there, add your own. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Catch the Wave! Join the Enron/MDA Beach Bowl!!
Help us "strike a blow" against ALS at the 3rd annual Enron/MDA Beach Bowl!
This year's event will be held on July 14th at Palace Lanes in Bellaire.
Come have a great time while raising money for ALS (Lou Gehrig's disease)
research. It doesn't matter if you bowl a 50 or a 300, as long as you have
fun! Call Lindsay Meade at ext. 34551 or Geriann Warner at ext. 35036 for
more information!
Make a donation to the Peru Earthquake Relief Fund!
Peru is beginning reconstruction after a powerful earthquake devastated the
southern region of the Andean highlands last Saturday. The 8.1-magnitude
earthquake, that has been recently upgraded to the "great" quake category -
the most powerful according to the U.S. Geological Survey- triggered a
tsunami that crashed into the seaport town of Camana destroying more houses
and raising the death toll. Up to now, the earthquake has left over 100
people dead, 1,374 injured and 47,696 homeless. The people who lost their
homes have been forced to sleep on the ground in Peru's frigid Andes
highlands, tents provided by the army and by some help organizations does not
provide sufficient insulation against winter temperatures in that region.
Help is urgently needed. If you would like to contribute to this cause please
send your donations to:
American Red Cross
2700 Southwest Freeway
Houston TX 77098
(In the memo line of your check please write: Earthquake-Peru)
In order to get Enron to match your donations dollar for dollar please go to
http://home.enron.com/cr/ and click on Gifts, Grants and Giving. Once there,
click the Matching Gifts link and you will be able print the Matching Gift
form. If you have any questions regarding the Matching Gift program please
email [email protected].
Join Enron,s Preferred Hotel Vendors July 10 in the Enron Building Lobby
Join Enron,s Preferred Hotel Vendors Tuesday, July 10th from 10:30 - 2:30 in
the Enron Building Lobby for &Your Passport to Hotel Savings8 brought to you
by Enron Global Strategic Sourcing. It,s your chance to learn about savings
opportunities, see clicktrip.com demos and register to win fabulous door
prizes including the GRAND PRIZE, a trip for two to London with airfare and
hotel accommodations.
Enron Night with the Astros Enron Field Gift Package Winner!!
The winner of the Enron Field Gift Package is Andrea Dulany. Andrea was one
of the first 200 employees to purchase tickets to Enron Night and was
selected at random to win this exciting prize courtesy of the Signature
Shop.
Thank you to everyone who purchased tickets and see you at the game on
Friday, July 20th!
Kuumba House Dance Theatre Presents Harambee African Heritage Arts Festival,
Saturday, July 21, 2001
Sam Houston Park @ Bagby and McKinney
10:00 am - 8:00 pm
For More Information Call 713-524-1079 or www.kuumbahouse.org
The event will include: African World Market
Artifacts
Clothing
Jewelry
Children's Activity Corner
Arts
Games
Prizes
Youth Talent Competition
Enron Travel Club - Monthly Meeting, July 10
The Enron Travel Club will hold it's monthly meeting on Tuesday, July 10th in
room EB5C2 from 12:00pm - 1:00pm.
Credit Union Offers Flood Relief Loans
EFCU is offering two special Flood Relief Loans to Enron employees and their
families who have been affected by the flooding.
o Signature Loans* at a 5.00% Fixed APR, single pay plan, and $10,000
maximum.
o Auto Loans** are available at 6.49% Fixed APR on all conventional loan
terms, with a 90-Day No Payment Option.
Apply on-line, 24 hours a day at enronfcu.com, then select Anytime Loans and
the loan type. Please type Flood Relief in the Purpose of Loan Field. Or,
call Anytime Loans at 800.235.8763 and reference our Flood Relief Loan. For
more information, please e-mail [email protected] or call our Lending Department
at x30578.
*Must be a Credit Union member to apply. Unpaid loans must pay interest due
after 6 months, and renew on monthly payments at the regular lobby rate at
time of renewal. **Term will be extended and finance charges will continue to
accrue during the 90-day period. Subject to normal underwriting requirements.
Auto Balloon Notes and current loans are excluded from this offer. No other
discounts apply. EFCU is an Equal Housing Lender & NCUA Insured. Loans will
mature on March 1, 2002. Offers end July 15, 2001.
ENRON WELLNESS BLOOD DRIVE
Two M. D. Anderson Blood Center mobile coaches will be parked on Andrews
Street on Thursday, July 12, from 7 a.m. until 4 p.m. for the Enron Wellness
Department's 3rd quarter blood drive. If you were unable to make the special
blood drive held June 14, here's your chance to donate. Call the Enron
Health Center at ext. 3-6100 or mailto:[email protected] to schedule an
appointment. Let's continue the spirit of giving!
Have News to Share?
To post news or events in Enron In Action, please e-mail your information to
[email protected]
no later than 12:00 noon the Thursday prior to the next Monday,s mailing. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please take a look at this.
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490
John M Singer@ENRON
10/25/2000 05:14 PM
To: Debra Perlingiere/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Cutter Oil Company
Debra,
Is there a different contract for the purchase of "metered production". If
so, would you please email to me.
Thankd,
John | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Before we take this on, let's talk about how it fits into our priorities. What will be happening that we must cover?
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Perrino, Dave
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 12:29 AM
To: Alvarez, Ray; Walton, Steve; Steffes, James D.
Subject: RE: WSCC BOT Meeting announcement - Dec 5-6 Phoenix
Ray,
I will be happy to attend the WSCC BOT meeting in December. I spoke to Steve about the issues to be covered, so we should be all set. I will contact WSCC and register next week.
Kind Regards,
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Alvarez, Ray
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:45 AM
To: Perrino, Dave; Walton, Steve; Steffes, James D.
Subject: RE: WSCC BOT Meeting announcement - Dec 5-6 Phoenix
Dave, Steve and I talked and due to our schedules and distance from Phoenix, we think it would be most effective if you could represent the company at this BOT meeting. This is assuming your schedule allows and Jim is on board with one of us attending. It will be an important meeting with approval of WECC and next year's budget on the agenda. I am making hotel reservations for you, since today is the deadline. I think you also need to fill out a form for WSCC; Jenny Remington is the meeting planner. I will send Dennis Eyre a delegation after I hear from you and Jim. Ray
-----Original Message-----
From: Perrino, Dave
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:20 PM
To: Alvarez, Ray; Walton, Steve
Subject: WSCC BOT Meeting announcement - Dec 5-6 Phoenix
FYI
<< File: DEC 2001 ANNOUNCE.doc >> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please call me.
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 3:12 PM
To: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Subject: RE:
Kim -
Tomorrow morning after 9:30 is OK for me.
JRW
-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 3:08 PM
To: Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Subject: RE:
we need to do it sooner than later - would today or tomarrow morning work for you? I am really curious about Frank Vickers and when he is avail. Can I let you know when I hear from him?
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Jason R (Credit)
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 3:07 PM
To: Ward, Kim S (Houston); Vickers, Frank W.; Taylor, Craig
Subject: RE:
Kim -
Can we set up the call for 3:30 p.m. instead?
JRW
-----Original Message-----
From: Ward, Kim S (Houston)
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 3:02 PM
To: Williams, Jason R (Credit); Vickers, Frank W.; Taylor, Craig
Subject:
Guys,
I am trying to set up a conference call with Steve Snyder, (etal) of HESCO to determine once and for all if we can do business with them, what it will take to do business with them, and what kind of business we can do with them. If we can't do business with them, we need to say so with an explanation. How does Tuesday afternoon at 1:30 sound? Let me know ASAP so I can set it up.
Thanks,
Kim | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The deal has been fixed. I'm so sorry about that - when I changed the dates
at the top, the computer asked if I'd like it to copy the changes into the
strips. I should have checked to make sure it did this correctly!
And I will definitely add notes in the comments section of deals I change
from now on. Thanks for the tip.
Kate
From: Sharen Cason 12/19/2000 03:44 PM
To: Kate Symes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: #482593
Whatever you changed on this deal, it now reads that it flows 32 hours a
day! You have five strips in, each flowing for 16 hours.
Also, when you change a deal, if you could make small note about what you
changed in the comment section of deal entry, if really makes things go
faster. We know what change to look for when we make the revision.
Let me know when it is fixed.
Thanks! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 1/8/02; HourAhead hour: 2; No ancillary schedules awarded. Variances detected.
Variances detected in Load schedule.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002010802.txt
---- Load Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblLoads.
Details: (Hour: 2 / Preferred: 13.84 / Final: 13.81)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
LOAD_ID: PGE4
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 1/8/02
SC_ID: ENRJ | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I inadvertently missed the awards / dinner, I WILL attend.
Thanks.
Debra Perlingiere
Enron North America Corp.
Legal Department
1400 Smith Street, EB 3885
Houston, Texas 77002
[email protected]
Phone 713-853-7658
Fax 713-646-3490 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI
DON
----- Original Message -----
From: "donreid1" <[email protected]>
To: "Quilkey, Paul" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 7:55 AM
Subject: Re: APEL
> Paul,
>
> Thanks for your email.
>
> I sent various emails since I did not know who should be contacted given
the
> various changes in the Enron organization.
>
> The project is progressing. APEL was wondering whether Enron would have
an
> interest in marketing the output of the 1,000 MW plant and the low sulfur
> diesel under a long term contract at a fixed price.
>
> Paul, could you email me your telephone number and address. We will keep
> you posted on progress.
>
> Regards,
>
> Don Reid
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Quilkey, Paul" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Kitchen, Louise" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 6:47 PM
> Subject: APEL
>
>
> Don
> I am aware of multiple emails circulating within Enron regarding this
> project. We have previously met with Alan Blood et.al. in Sydney
> regarding this project and expressed our level of interest by letter
> (attached). Should you feel that there has been significant progress
> since our last meeting, then we welcome an updated presentation.
>
> Regards
>
> Paul Quilkey
>
> <<APEL Letter 12 February 2001.doc>>
>
> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Did Sheila want Scott to participate? Looks like the call will be too late
for him. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
What's up?
Alexandra Saler@EES
12/14/2000 08:18 AM
To: Jeffrey A Shankman/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re:
what??????????
To: Alexandra Saler/HOU/EES@EES
cc:
Subject: Re:
oh.................my...............god.............. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Sue,
I thought there was a extra rate component for SCE undercollection that the
MOU would add.
If so, that extra rate should not be allowed to go forward until (a) the
legislation passes the MOU; and (b) the CPUC agrees how to levy it.
does anyone have clarity on this rate adder?
Thanks,
Tamara.
Susan J Mara@ENRON
05/11/2001 12:28 PM
To: Tamara Johnson/HOU/EES@EES, Scott Stoness/HOU/EES@EES, Harry
Kingerski/NA/Enron@Enron, Robert
Neustaedter/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, James D
Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron,
Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: SCE Plans to Implement billing and balancing account aspects of MOU
as of June 3
I learned at the AReM meeting today:
SCE has informed ESPs that it will implement its advice letter on the MOU
(don't recall the number) beginning with the new rates on June 3. We are
planning to protest that AL. Do we care? IF we do, Jeanne, can we stop them?
Also, SCE has informed people that it is calculating the PX Charge/Credit
based on its AL that was rejected by the CPUC. Do we care on that one?
Sue Mara
Enron Corp.
Tel: (415) 782-7802
Fax:(415) 782-7854 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please review the attachment and let me know if you have any changes. The final document will provide a starting place for the year end review process. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
EnronOnline
Putting the energy into ecommerce
and now
Taking the big deal out of the big deal.
Did we TM these?
Paul was doing all of this before he left. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
yes, I would be interested
fletch | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Yes!!! We are facing more margin requirements in Canada and need to increase
our flexibility in acceptable forms of margin.
-----Original Message-----
From: Keohane, Peter
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 7:02 PM
To: Taylor, Mark; Shackleton, Sara; Hendry, Brent; Cook, Mary; St Clair,
Carol; Jones, Tana; William S Bradford/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Russell
Diamond/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Cc: Johnston, Greg; Powell, Mark; Gaffney, Chris
Subject: Cash Collateral
Greg Johnston may have a solution to the limitation on Canadian cash
collateral. Without getting into detail, a security interest in an
"instrument" can be perfected by possession under the Personal Property
Security Act, and an "instrument" includes a bank draft. If counterparties
were to provide bank drafts on the same terms as they provide LCs we could
rely on perfection by possession. Is this something we should investigate
further? Peter. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
UBS has organized an important meeting for all employees in Canada and the United States.
The meeting starts at 9:00 am (Mountain) and will last until approximately 12 pm. It will be presented by senior managers from UBS on the firm and it's strategy.
I'm sorry for the short notice on this - please call out to anyone who should be attending who will not get this message in time
Kelly McMillan
on behalf of UBS HR | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by Tana Jones/HOU/ECT on 03/02/2000 08:43 AM
---------------------------
Molly Harris
03/01/2000 05:55 PM
To: Frank L Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT, Karen Lambert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tana
Jones/HOU/ECT@ECT, Samuel Schott/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Sheri Thomas/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bernice
Rodriguez/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Moran/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brant Reves/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie
R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brian Hunter-Lindsay/LON/ECT@ECT, Coenraad
Basson/LON/ECT@ECT, Bhautik Patel/LON/ECT@ECT, David Hardy/LON/ECT@ECT, David
Weekes/LON/ECT@ECT, Carrie Southard/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Gillette/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Linda S Bryan/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: EOL Credit Responses 3/1
Please find attached Credit's EOL responses for 3/1/00.
Regards
Molly | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Good afternoon Barry.
Please advise to the organizational attachment below.
In addition, if you have any further questions or comments, please feel
free to contact myself, or Scott Pleus.
Regards,
Inga Latson
Enron Broadband Services
Administrative Assistant II
Office# 713-853-3540
Scott Pleus
Enron Broadband Services
Office# 713-853-6577
Hm# 281-261-0499
Pgr# 713-761-4808
Mobile# 281-300-8286 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 12/26/2000 11:08 AM -----
JMB <[email protected]>
12/22/2000 06:28 PM
To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'"
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: FW: RULING FOR HEARINGS ON 12/27 AND 12/28
-----Original Message-----
From: Minkin, Angela K. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 4:07 PM
Subject: RULING FOR HEARINGS ON 12/27 AND 12/28
Parties, attached is the promised ruling that provides procedural guidance
for the hearings on 12/27 and 12/28. The ruling will also be posted on the
web site as quickly as possible.
Thank you for your patience and I hope you can take a few moments to enjoy
the holidays.
--Angela Minkin
Administrative Law Judge
<<1%P701!.doc>> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
They restored the wrong file. I called him to restore Modelgriffith.xls.
Thanks.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Turcich, Charles
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:15 PM
To: Griffith, John
Subject: file restored
John,
The file services team has restored your file. The information is below.
Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:56:53 PM dmayeux
O:\GlobalTrading\Financial\Trading\Historicals\History.xls
File is for a trader, need it restored ASAP. Thanks!
Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:03:45 PM mwolf
File has been restored and renamed as ~0History.xls
Charles Turcich
Work - 713.345.3280
Enron Corp. - ECN3278B
Desktop Analyst - Trader Support | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The plans are up in the air. The first weekend that everyone can make it | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
So?
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 11/17/2000 08:10
AM ---------------------------
"Keffer, John" <[email protected]> on 11/16/2000 05:10:37 PM
To: "Smith, Reggie" <[email protected]>, "Mann, C. Kay" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>, "Treistman, Carlos"
<[email protected]>, "Dimitroff, Sashe" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject:
It's time to renew the season tickets for the Astros. There are 81 home
games next season and the cost for the four seats is $9,628, or $118.86 per
game. The location of the seats is as last year.
Let me know how many games you're in for. I'll need checks payable to the
Houston Astros by December 15.
Thanks!
Confidentiality Notice
This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or
confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the
named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or
disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete
all copies of the message. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
As of 10/26/01:
Glad to discuss...
Steve | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
>
>
> Dr. Levine:
> I found this article quite useful in understanding the evolution of
> the U.S. monetary policy. Do you think this is appropriate for the
> entire class?
> Thanks,
>
> -Jay Iyer
>
> http://www.frbsf.org/econrsrch/wklyltr/wklyltr99/el99-04.html
>
>
> Economic Research
>
>
>
>
>
>
> FRBSF Economic Letter
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Number 99-04; January 29, 1999
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------
>
> <../index.htm>Economic Letter Index
>
> The Goals of U.S. Monetary Policy
> * The evolution of the Fed's legislative mandate
> * The debate about the Fed's current mandate
> * References
>
> ----------
> The Federal Reserve has seen its legislative mandate for monetary policy
> change several times since its founding in 1913, when macroeconomic policy
as
> such was not clearly understood. The most recent revisions were in 1977 and
> 1978, and they require the Fed to promote both price stability and full
> employment. The past changes in the mandate appear to reflect both economic
> events in the U.S. and advances in understanding how the economy functions.
> In the twenty years since the Fed's mandate was last changed, there have
been
> further important economic developments as well as refinements in economic
> thought, and these raise the issue of whether to modify the goals for U.S.
> monetary policy once again. Indeed, a number of other countries--notably
> those that adopted the Euro as a common curency at the start of this
> year--have accepted price stability as the new primary goal for their
> monetary policies.
>
> In this Letter, we spell out the evolution of the legislation governing U.S.
> monetary policy goals and summarize the debate about whether they could be
> improved.
>
> The evolution of the Fed's legislative mandate
>
> The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 did not incorporate any macroeconomic goals
> for monetary policy, but instead required the Fed to "provide an elastic
> currency." This meant that the Fed should help the economy avoid the
> financial panics and bank runs that plagued the 19th century by serving as a
> "lender of last resort," which involved making loans directly to depository
> institutions through the discount windows of the Reserve Banks. During this
> early period, most of the actions of monetary policy that affected the macro
> economy were determined by the U.S. government's adherence to the gold
> standard.
>
> The trauma of the Great Depression, coupled with the insights of Keynes
> (1936), led to an acknowledgment of the obligation of the federal government
> to prevent recessions. The Employment Act of 1946 was the first legislative
> statement of these macroeconomic policy goals. Although it did not
> specifically mention the Federal Reserve, it required the federal government
> in general to foster "conditions under which there will be afforded useful
> employment opportunities ... for those able, willing, and seeking to work,
> and to promote maximum employment, production, and purchasing power."
>
> The Great Inflation of the 1970s was the next major U.S. economic
> dislocation. This problem was addressed in a 1977 amendment to the Federal
> Reserve Act, which provided the first explicit recognition of price
stability
> as a national policy goal. The amended Act states that the Fed "shall
> maintain long run growth of the monetary and credit aggregates commensurate
> with the economy's long run potential to increase production, so as to
> promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and
> moderate long-term interest rates." The goals of "stable prices" and
> "moderate long-term interest rates" are related because nominal interest
> rates are boosted by a premium over real rates equal to expected future
> inflation. Thus, "stable prices" will typically produce long-term interest
> rates that are "moderate."
>
> The objective of "maximum" employment remained intact from the 1946
> Employment Act; however, the interpretation of this term may have changed
> during the intervening 30 years. Immediately after World War II, when
> conscription and price controls had produced a high-pressure economy with
> very low unemployment in the U.S., some perhaps believed that the goal of
> "maximum" employment could be taken in its mathematical sense to mean the
> highest possible level of employment. However, by the second half of the
> 1970s, it was well understood that some "frictional" unemployment, which
> involves the search for new jobs and the transition between occupations, is
a
> necessary accompaniment to the proper functioning of the economy in the long
> run.
>
> This understanding went hand in hand in the latter half of the 1970s with a
> general acceptance of the Natural Rate Hypothesis, which implies that if
> policy were to try to keep employment above its long-run trend permanently
> or, equivalently, the unemployment rate below its natural rate, then
> inflation would be pushed higher and higher. Policy can temporarily
reduce the
> unemployment rate below its natural rate or, equivalently, boost employment
> above its long-run trend. However, persistently attempting to maintain
> "maximum" employment that is above its long-run level would not be
consistent
> with the goal of stable prices.
>
> Thus, in order for maximum employment and stable prices to be mutually
> consistent goals, maximum employment should be interpreted as meaning
maximum
> sustainable employment, referred to also as "full employment." Moreover,
> although the Fed has little if any influence on the long-run level of
> employment, it can attempt to smooth out short-run fluctuations.
Accordingly,
> promoting full employment can be interpreted as a countercyclical monetary
> policy in which the Fed aims to smooth out the amplitude of the business
> cycle.
>
> This interpretation of the Fed's mandate was later confirmed in the
> Humphrey-Hawkins legislation. As its official title--the Full Employment and
> Balanced Growth Act of 1978--clearly implies, this legislation mandates the
> federal government generally to "...promote full employment and production,
> increased real income, balanced growth, a balanced Federal budget, adequate
> productivity growth, proper attention to national priorities, achievement of
> an improved trade balance . . . and reasonable price stability..." (italics
> added).
>
> Besides clarifying the general goal of full employment, the Humphrey-Hawkins
> Act also specified numerical definitions or targets. The Act specified two
> initial goals: an unemployment rate of 4% for full employment and a CPI
> inflation rate of 3% for price stability. These were only "interim" goals to
> be achieved by 1983 and followed by a further reduction in inflation to 0%
by
> 1988; however, the disinflation policies during this period were not to
> impede the achievement of the full-employment goal. Thereafter, the
timetable
> to achieve or maintain price stability and full employment was to be defined
> by each year's Economic Report of the President.
>
> The debate about the Fed's current mandate
>
> The Fed then has two main legislated goals for monetary policy: promoting
> full employment and promoting stable prices. With this mandate, the Fed has
> helped foster the exceptional performance of the U.S. economy during the
past
> decade. Still, some have argued that the Fed's mandate could be improved,
> especially in looking ahead to future attempts to maintain or
> institutionalize recent low inflation. Much discussion has centered on two
> topics: the transparency of the goals and their dual nature.
>
> The transparency of goals refers to the extent to which the objectives of
> monetary policy are clearly defined and can be easily and obviously
> understood by the public. The goal of full employment will never be very
> transparent because it is not directly observed but only estimated by
> economists with limited precision. For example, the 1997 Economic Report of
> the President (which has authority in this matter from the Humphrey-Hawkins
> Act) gives a range of 5 to 6% for the unemployment rate consistent with full
> employment, with a midpoint of 5.5%. Research suggests that there is a very
> wide range of uncertainty around any estimate of the natural rate, with one
> prominent study finding a 95% probability that it falls in the wide range of
> 4 to 7-1/2 % (see Walsh 1998).
>
> Price stability as a goal is also subject to some ambiguity. Recent economic
> analysis has uncovered systematic biases, say, on the order of 1 percentage
> point, in the CPI's measurement of inflation (see Motley 1997). In this
case,
> actual price stability would be consistent with measured inflation of 1%. In
> addition, at any point in time, different price indexes register different
> rates of inflation. Over the past year, for example, the CPI has risen about
> 1-1/2%, while the GDP price index has risen about 1%. Still, a transparent
> price stability goal could be specified as a precise numerical growth rate
> (or range) for a particular index (which could take into account any
biases).
> However, economists have also suggested other ways to enhance the
> transparency of policy. For example, publishing medium-term inflation
> forecasts might help to clarify the direction of policy (Rudebusch and Walsh
> 1998). Because the central bank has some control over inflation in the
medium
> term, its forecasts would contain an indication of where it wanted inflation
> to go.
>
> A second recent proposed modification to the Fed's goals involves focusing
to
> a larger extent on price stability and de-emphasizing business cycle
> stabilization. Some economists have argued that having dual goals will lead
> to an inflation bias despite the Fed's best attempts to control inflation.
> This argument stresses that the temptation to engineer gains in output in
the
> short run will overcome the central bank's desire to control inflation in
the
> long run. As a result of elevated inflation expectations of the public,
> inflation will end up being higher than the central bank intended, despite
> its best efforts. This "time-inconsistency" argument, as economists call it,
> coupled with the pain incurred in the 1970s as inflation skyrocketed and in
> the early 1980s as inflation was reduced to moderate levels, persuaded many
> that the primary goal of the central bank should be to stabilize prices.
>
> This view is embodied in the charter for the central bank in the new
European
> Monetary Union: "The primary objective of the European System of Central
> Banks is to maintain price stability. Without prejudice to the objective of
> price stability, the ESCB shall support the general economic policies in the
> Community." Among these latter policies are "a high level of employment" and
> "a balanced development of economic activities."
>
> Economists remain divided on the importance of the time inconsistency
problem
> and on the need to put primary emphasis on price stability at the expense of
> output stabilization. Some stress the fact that the central bank is the only
> entity that can guarantee price stability, and that this goal is not likely
> to be attained for long unless price stability is designated as the primary
> goal. Others find the arguments for time inconsistency implausible because
> policymakers, who are aware of the arguments about an inflationary bias and
> see the implications for inflation, can conduct policy without an
> inflationary bias (McCallum 1995). Still others argue that the abdication of
> other goals is irresponsible (Fuhrer 1997). Also, a good deal of empirical
> research using simulations of models of the U.S. economy suggests that a
> focus on dual goals can reduce the variance of real GDP (i.e., smooth the
> business cycle) while achieving an inflation goal as well (Rudebusch and
> Svensson 1998).
>
> While these issues are not yet resolved, the experience of the past two
> decades provides some support to those who think dual goals that lack
> transparency can function successfully. It is true that some countries
around
> the world have reduced inflation over this period while putting primary
> emphasis on explicit inflation targeting. But at the same time, with its
> current legislative mandate, the Fed also has had success in reducing
> inflation, while maintaining the flexibility of responding to business cycle
> conditions.
>
> John P. Judd
> Vice President and Associate
> Director of Research
>
> Glenn D. Rudebusch
> Research Officer
> References
>
> Fuhrer, Jeffrey C. 1997. "Central Bank Independence and Inflation Targeting:
> Monetary Policy Paradigms for the Next Millennium?" New England Economic
> Review January/February, pp.20-36.
> Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and
> Money. Harcourt, Brace, and Company: New York.
>
> McCallum, Bennett. 1995. "Two Fallacies Concerning Central Bank
> Independence." American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, vol. 85,
no. 2
> (May), pp. 207-211.
>
> Motley, Brian. 1997. "Bias in the CPI: Roughly Wrong or Precisely Wrong."
> <../el97-16.htm>FRBSF Economic Letter<../el97-16.htm> 97-16 (May 23).
>
> Rudebusch, Glenn D., and Lars E.O. Svensson. 1998.
> <http://www.iies.su.se/data/home/leosven/papers/rs.pdf>"Policy Rules for
> Inflation Targeting." NBER Working Paper 6512.
>
> Rudebusch Glenn D., and Carl E. Walsh. 1998. "U.S. Inflation Targeting: Pro
> and Con." <../wklyltr98/el98-18.htm>FRBSF Economic
> Letter<../wklyltr98/el98-18.htm> 98-18 (May 29).
>
> Walsh, Carl E. 1998. "The Natural Rate, NAIRU, and Monetary Policy."
> <../wklyltr98/el98-28.htm>FRBSF Economic Letter
> <../wklyltr98/el98-28.htm>98-28 (September 18).
>
> ----------
> Opinions expressed in this newsletter do not necessarily reflect the views
of
> the management of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or of the Board
> of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Editorial comments may be
> addressed to the editor or to the author. Mail comments to:
>>
>> Research Department
>> Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
>> P.O. Box 7702
>> San Francisco, CA 94120
>
>
David I. Levine Associate professor
Haas School of Business ph: 510/642-1697
University of California fax: 510/643-1420
Berkeley CA 94720-1900 email:
[email protected]
http://web.haas.berkeley.edu/www/levine/ | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This warning is sent automatically to inform you that your mailbox is approaching the maximum size limit.
Your mailbox size is currently 80202 KB.
Mailbox size limits:
When your mailbox reaches 75000 KB you will receive this message.To check the size of your mailbox:
Right-click the mailbox (Outlook Today),
Select Properties and click the Folder Size button.
This method can be used on individual folders as well.
To make more space available, delete any items that are no longer needed such as Sent Items and Journal entries.
You must empty the Deleted Items folder after deleting items or the space will not be freed.
To turn Journaling off,
click Tools | Options | Journaling Options and de-select all items.
See client Help for more information. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
LTV Steel's Northern Ohio Energy Conference, in Cleveland Ohio
You will be on a panel with reps from Centerior, Ohio Edison, Cinergy
Audience will be between 400-500 ppl
Per Terrie James | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here's that video of Marty McSorly hacking that guy...
---------------------- Forwarded by Mike Curry/HOU/ECT on 03/09/2000 01:01 PM
---------------------------
[email protected] on 02/25/2000 02:55:05 PM
To: "McRae AP (Andrew)" <[email protected]>
cc: "'ARNOTT, Kyle'" <[email protected]>, "'Chabot, Paul'"
<[email protected]>, "'COUGHLIN, Tim'" <[email protected]>, Mike
Curry/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'LIVINGSTONE, Brian'" <[email protected]>,
"'LUSSIER, Geoff'" <[email protected]>, "'MARKS, Robert'"
<[email protected]>, Mike Dyck <[email protected]>, "'PURCELL, Eric'"
<[email protected]>, Robert Scheuer/HOU/ECT@ECT, "'WHITE, Jim'"
<[email protected]>, "'WILSON, Jeff'" <[email protected]>, "'ZIMMERMANN,
Scott'" <[email protected]>
Subject: Mitchsorely
(See attached file: mcsorley.avi)
- mcsorley.avi | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Greg,
I know this has been a tough couple of weeks for you but I thought I would drop you a line and share my impressions:
1). This deal is an ideal opportunity to merge back and mid office support platforms. We have discussed this many times and EnronNetworks was practically set up for this (CommodityLogic et al...)
2). I don't know what you folks have in mind but I could see leaving ENE's market making and trading structure intact and having DYN's asset-based trading be just another business unit like EES was. but the key is the tremendous cost savings of the common support platform.
I don't mean to be presumptuous but I hadn't talked to you in a while and wanted to get it off my chest.
Good luck,
Andy | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
To signatories to the Comprehensive Settlement for SoCalGas & SDG&E:
A few more "errata" I plan to make, absent objection:
A. Creditworthiness Sections (1.2.3.2 and 2.2.3.2):
In 1.2.3.2 on p.21, under b., subitem ii. should have "or" inserted at the
end of the subitem and the "or" at the end of subitem iii. should be
stricken (so that the reports or forms listed in i., ii., and iii. are
alternatives to each other (customer only has to provide one of the three)
and subitems iv. and v. are additional required items).
In 2.2.3.2 on pp.36-37, make parallel changes in the "or"s as stated above.
On p.22, under h., subitems i. through v. should be indented more than h.
and then items j), k) and l) should be renumbered i., j., k. (this will then
match section 2.2.3.2, which has the correct spacing/alphanumbering).
On p.22 and p.37, we'd like to drop the reference to "U.S." in the reference
to a letter of credit issued by a major "U.S." financial institution.
SoCalGas has realized that it has already had dealings with Canadian or
other foreign-owned customers where it was reasonable to rely on letters of
credit from major financial institutions of the parent's country. (This
should be ok with Paul Amirault, eh?)
B. Btu content
On pp.10 (twice) and 31, the settlement says we are assuming 1,016 Btu/mcf
for the heating value of gas (subject to revision by Commission during term
of settlement). We have the wrong units. It is 1,016 Btu per cubic foot,
not per thousand cubic feet. We'd propose to change the number to 1,016
Btu/cf (not "1,016 Btu/mcf") On p.33, we got the units right the first time
and don't need to change them on that page.
Again, I'd appreciate you getting back to me or Brian Cherry by noon Friday
if you have any problem with the above changes.
-- Glen Sullivan
-----Original Message-----
From: Sullivan, Glen J.
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 12:58 PM
To: 'MBD'; 'Leslie, John'; 'Elsesser, Evie'; 'McCrea, Keith'; 'Pocta, R.
Mark'; 'Dasovich, Jeff'; 'Beach, Tom'; 'Burkholder, John'; 'Amirault,
Paul'; 'Alexander, Michael'; 'Chancellor, Craig'; 'Dingwall, B.';
'Douglass, Dan@SES'; 'Fawcett, Jeff'; 'Porter, Doug'; 'Rochman,
Michael'; 'Counihan, Rick'; 'Bayless, David'; 'Paul, Joe'; 'Jimison,
John'; 'Foss, Robert'; McVay, Nancy W - TPNWM; 'Scott, Susan'; 'Karp,
Joe'; 'Johnson, Pamela'; 'gileau, patrick'
Cc: Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL; Nelson, Eric B. - TPEBN; Morrow, Rick - TP3RMM;
Follett, B. David - TPDBF; Brill, Thomas R.; Van Lierop, Jan - TP2JXV;
Harrigan, James P. - TP1JPH; Sakarias, Wayne P.; Purves, Ralph A.;
Teeter, James S.; Watson, Steven - TP2SAW; Cherry, Brian - TPBKC;
Whitaker, Sue
Subject: RE: Gas Industry Settlement
To signatories to the Comprehensive Settlement:
ALJ Biren has given us until Friday of this week (April 28, 2000) to file
"errata" to the Comprehensive Settlement.
So far, I am planning to make the following non-substantive changes:
1. The table of contents was seriously messed up by an "automatic update"
feature in Word just before we duplicated and filed. I will be putting it
back to the state you saw in the final draft.
2. On p.7, section 1.12, put a period at the end of the last sentence.
3. On p.9, section 1.1.3.1, two thirds of the way down the page, I will be
changing "subject to adjustment annual by the base rate PBR formula" to
"subject to adjustment annually by the base rate PBR formula".
4. On p.27, section 1.5.4, in the third full paragraph on the page, I will
be changing "If only one customer has an OFO day" to "If only one customer
class has an OFO day".
5. Also on p.27, section 1.5.4, bottom line on the page, I will be filling
in the blank with "C" (so it reads "Appendix C")
In the category of "maybe substantive",
1. On p.10, section 1.1.3.2, three lines from the bottom of the page, the
date "October 1, 2000" would be changed to "October 1, 2001". This sentence
refers to including the cost of backbone transmission for core customers
buying gas from SoCalGas in the "procurement" rate. Obviously, our intent
was to do that only once we had unbundled backbone transmission, which
happens on October 1, 2001.
In the category of "substantive":
1. Our capacity term sheet had said that we would unbundled "additional"
(non-reliability) storage for CTAs effective upon implementation of the
settlement (See p.4). The filed settlement managed to drop the section that
provided for this option for CTAs prior to the principal storage change on
April 1, 2001. (The filed settlement is ok for the period starting April 1,
2001). So, to be consistent with the term sheet, we need to insert
something back into the settlement to allow CTAs to opt out of
non-reliability storage in the period from the effective date (90 days after
approval) to April 1, 2001. Obviously, this may not be a very long period.
John Leslie has suggested inserting at the very beginning of Section
5.4.4.3: "In the partial storage year beginning on the effective date of
this Settlement Agreement, and....[continue with current text]." We would
need to cover as part of implementation filings the exact mechanism/pricing
for SoCalGas purchasing gas in storage owned by CTAs if they opt out of
nonreliability storage prior to April 1. 2001. SoCalGas and SDG&E are ok
with John's language and want to make sure it is ok with other signatories.
If you have any problems with any of these changes, please contact me or
Brian Cherry by noon on Friday, April 28. My email is [email protected]
and my phone is (619) 699-5162. Brian's email is [email protected] and
phone is (213) 244-3895.
We are looking at the possibility of two or three additional changes, and
Brian may send you a follow-up message.
-- Glen Sullivan
Sempra Energy Law Dept. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Prentice ever get back to you regarding logistics about tomorrow nite? What
time is dinner by the way. I'm supposed to do something from 3-4, but could
come up directly thereafter. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Greg,
just a note to let you know I will be out of the office Wed(3/21) until
Thurs(3/23). The kids are on spring break. I will be in San Marcos and you
can reach me on my cell phone 713-410-4679 or email [email protected].
I was planning on stopping by to see Hugo Elizondo on Thursday to drop off a
check and give him the green light to file for replatting. What will change
if we want to try and complete the project in phases. Does he need to change
what he is going to submit to the city.
I spoke to Gordon Kohutek this morning. He was contracted to complete the
soils study. He says he will be done with his report by the end of the
week. I don't know who needs this report. I told Gordon you might call to
inquire about what work he performed. His number is 512-930-5832.
We spoke on the phone about most of these issues.
Talk to you later.
Phillip | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Can you join me at this meeting? I plan to talk with Tom Gros tomorrow to
let him know that you will be the liasion with CommodityLogic for Energy
Operations. Then I thought that we could both attend this next meeting as a
transition. Then it's on your calendar after that ! --Sally
---------------------- Forwarded by Sally Beck/HOU/ECT on 08/14/2000 05:29 PM
---------------------------
08/14/2000 03:13 PM
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
Brenda Flores-Cuellar@ENRON
08/14/2000 03:13 PM
08/14/2000 03:13 PM
To: Sally Beck/HOU/ECT@ECT, D Todd Hall/HOU/ECT@ECT, Brent A
Price/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tommy J Yanowski/HOU/ECT@ECT, Leslie Reeves/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Thresa A Allen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jennifer deBoisblanc Denny/HOU/ECT@ECT, Alan
Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Debbie R Brackett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Simon
Sear/Corp/Enron@ENRON, John Norden/HOU/ECT@ECT, John
Pavetto/Corp/Enron@Enron, Chris Schomer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jeff
Blumenthal/HOU/ECT@ECT, Susan Harrison/HOU/ECT@ECT, John P
Tollefsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Todd Ballengee/NA/Enron@ENRON, Andrew
Cole/NA/Enron@ENRON, Brad Romine/NA/Enron@Enron, Patti Thompson/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lynn Tippery/HOU/ECT@ECT, Xochil Moreno/HOU/ECT@ECT, Joya Davis/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Yolanda Ford/HOU/ECT@ECT, Irena D Hogan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chantelle
Villanueva/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dorothy Youngblood/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sheila
Graves/Corp/Enron@Enron, Terry Furches/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc:
Subject: Re: CommodityLogic Team Mtg. 8/16
REMINDER :
Our weekly CommodityLogic Team meeting will be held in EB 21C2 on Wednesday,
August 16th. from 10am - 11am. If you have any questions or will be UNABLE to
attend, please feel free to send me an e-mail or call me.
Thanks,
Brenda
x31914 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI: Set up a meeting with Kari Dohn for next Wednesday.
Steven J Kean
11/27/2000 09:22 PM
To: Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT, Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@Enron, Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@Enron, Mary
Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@Enron, [email protected],
Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@Enron, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, David Parquet/SF/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Options the Governor's Considering
Jeff Dasovich and I, along with several IEP members, met with Gov Davis'
staff today, including his Chief of Staff, his Staff Director and two policy
advisors on energy issues. They made the following points:
The Governor is personally spending a great deal of time on electricity
issues (and is forcing them to spend their time on it as well).
The Governor recognizes that part of the problem is a supply shortage, but
they put special emphasis on the view that in addition to supply shortfalls,
a big part of the problem is a "dysfunctional market" -- a thinly veiled
reference to price manipulation by people sitting in the room.
The Governor's view is that all participants (regulators, utilities,
customers and generators) must "behave responsibly".
Everyone must "share the pain".
The legislative battles are likely to start as soon as the legislature
returns next week, and the Governor will be putting forth several legislative
proposals in the next couple of weeks.
While staff went out of its way to say that the list of proposals (in the
attached e-mail) were unofficial and for discussion purposes only, it was
fairly clear that they defined much of what the governor plans to propose.
The meeting was not very encouraging nor did it provide much in the way of
new information. The IEP group was on message, making the usual arguments
about the need for forward contracting, expedited generation and transmission
siting, a real retail market to promote demand side responses, etc. The
staff is clearly focussed on forward contracting as part of the solution but
remains committed to the idea that generators have to cough up some money and
remain subject to rate caps, possible restrictions on sales outside the state
(at least at peak times), etc. One approach they appear to be toying with is
a "share the pain" proposal which would have utilities absorbing some of the
deferred costs and consumers absorbing some of the deferred costs in the form
of higher rates. That leaves generators ... who they might want to either
agree to some refunds or provide power at lower going-forward prices.
The staff says that they remain open to proposed solutions, but the Davis
administration appears unwilling to spend any political capital to fix the
problem.
I think we are in for a lengthy legislative and PUC fight. We should, as
always, provide consistent and reasonable solutions. I think we should
prepare a document for distribution to staff, legislators (and anyone else)
that takes the factual background and proposed solutions we have put forward
(eg in Belden's presentation and the Seabron Adamson whitepaper) and wraps
them in a more political context. In other words, we have already
articulated the right answers; we now need to put a political rationale
around our proposals -- a set of arguments which responds directly to the
political opposition those answers are likely to encounter. Jeff will follow
up with one of the staff members in particular (Kari Dohn) and I would
suggest that Jeff and Sandi work together on putting the necessary political
rhetoric around the solutions we have proposed.
Jeff Dasovich
Sent by: Jeff Dasovich
11/22/2000 04:00 PM
To: [email protected], Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul
Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L
Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Susan J Mara/NA/Enron@ENRON, Joe
Hartsoe/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Mary Hain/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sarah
Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, [email protected], Karen Denne/Corp/Enron@ENRON,
Alan Comnes/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Options the Governor's Considering
Steve: FYI. Don't worry about the conference call, but thought it might be
useful to review the proposals prior to Monday's meeting.
See you Monday.
Happy Thanksgiving to all.
Best,
Jeff
******************************************************************************
**************************************
Several IEP companies have been invited to a meeting with the Governor,s
staff next Monday, November 27th.
The following are some options, which the Governor,s office is considering.
IEP is doing some preliminary research on some of these topics. IEP would
like to arrange a teleconference call around noon on Monday, November 27th to
discuss the Governor,s meeting. Please advise us as to whether your have
been invited, and who you are sending.
California,s electricity supply situation has two inter-related problems )
(1) high wholesale electricity costs, and (2) marginally adequate supply of
generation ) both have combined to create a dysfunctional wholesale
electricity market. The goals should be:
To assure reliable electricity to California consumers for the lowest
reasonable cost.
o Consider requiring that all in-state generation be sold in state.
o Consider re-asserting state authority over the operation, maintenance and
safety practices of all in-state generating facilities, for public health and
safety purposes.
o Consider developing a state power authority to build generation and
own/operate transmission.
o Consider requiring utilities both to retain existing and to build new
generation.
o Consider providing utilities with authority to stabilize retail prices to
be paid by consumers through development of an energy portfolio that reduces
exposure to spot markets, including contracting forward for much more of
their unmet power needs.
o Consider extending consumer rate freeze.
o Consider centralizing power plant dispatch like the other ISOs in the rest
of the country.
o Consider eliminating the ISO and assigning its functions to either a state
or private entity that can acquire the transmission facilities, and control
the electricity transmission grid (MUNIs have proposed this).
o Consider sponsoring/supporting legislation to change the ISO and PX boards
to increase accountability.
o Expand energy conservation programs focused both on immediate peak demand
reduction and on longer term, broader-based programs.
o Aggressively work to site new generation and transmission facilities, to
streamline permitting, and to develop renewable resources.
o Call for/sponsor federal FERC reform legislation that would:
o Impose a regional price cap that varies by time of day and year;
o Set requirements for FERC to use its retroactive refund authority;
o Improve FERC enforcement over price gouging practices;
o Affirm the role of states to protect their customers from unjust prices.
o Pressure the FERC to do its job to (1) bring about responsible seller
behavior in wholesale electric markets through price controls and other
market interventions as necessary, and (2) provide refunds to affected
consumers.
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 11/22/2000 03:44 PM -----
Susan J Mara
11/22/2000 03:05 PM
To: "CHUDSON" <[email protected]>
cc: "Andy Brown \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, [email protected], "Curtis
Kebler \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Delaney Hunter
\(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Greg Blue \(E-mail\)"
<[email protected]>, "Jack Pigott \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Jeff
Dasovich \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Joe Ronan \(E-mail\)"
<[email protected]>, "John Stout \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], "Katie Kaplan \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], "Kelly Norton \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Lynn
Lednicky \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, [email protected],
[email protected], "Bob Weisenmiller \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Bob
Escalante \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Rob Lamkin \(E-mail\)"
<[email protected]>, "Jan Smutny-Jones \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>,
"Steven Kelly \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Susan J Mara \(E-mail\)"
<[email protected]>, "McNally Temple Assn. Inc. \(Business
Fax\)"@mail.cwo.com
Subject: Re:
Jeff Dasovich and Steve Kean are attending. Someone can be on a call -- me
if no one else -- if Jeff and Steve are travelling at the time. Hey, does the
Governor have to fly coach?
"CHUDSON" <[email protected]>
11/22/2000 12:47 PM
To: "Katie Kaplan \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Jeff Dasovich \(E-mail\)"
<[email protected]>, "Kelly Norton \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>,
"John Stout \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Curtis Kebler
\(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Rob Lamkin \(E-mail\)"
<[email protected]>, "Bob Weisenmiller \(E-mail\)"
<[email protected]>, "Susan J Mara \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Andy
Brown \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Bob Escalante \(E-mail\)"
<[email protected]>, "Greg Blue \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Jack
Pigott \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Jan Smutny-Jones \(E-mail\)"
<[email protected]>, "Joe Ronan \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Lynn Lednicky
\(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "McNally Temple Assn. Inc. \(Business
Fax\)"@mail.cwo.com, "Steven Kelly \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, "Susan J
Mara \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, "Delaney Hunter \(E-mail\)"
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
cc:
Subject:
Jan Smutny-Jones, Exec Dir
Independent Energy Producers Assn.
1112 I Street, Suite 380
Sacramento, CA 95814
PH: 916-448-9499
FX: 916-448-0182
[email protected]
- Govs meeting Conf Call.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I may not have been clear yesterday, but with the passage of time and no challenge from a taxing authority, we should get all of it back. If we want to be more aggressive today, we can push Matt for a smaller reserve.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: RE: Tax reserve on Allegheny Peakers
Looks like we can get it back if we need it
---------------------- Forwarded by Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT on 05/01/2001 07:33 AM ---------------------------
From: Stephen H Douglas/ENRON@enronXgate on 04/30/2001 08:32 PM
To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: RE: Tax reserve on Allegheny Peakers
The reserve referred to relates to Sales and Use tax ("Sales/Use tax") liability related to the purchase and use by the Peaker project companies of various equipment (i.e., turbines in Illinois and transformers in Tennessee and Indiana) used to construct the Peaker facilities in Illinois, Indiana and Tennessee. Enron bears this tax obligation under the Sales Agreement pursuant to which we sold the Peakers to Allegheny (effectively, this tax liability is a "pre-acquisition date" tax liability that we, as the seller, are responsible for). Typically, the equipment used to construct the Peakers would be assessed Sales/Use tax when purchased by the Project company that built the respective Peaker and that tax would effectively be passed on to the buyer in a sale such as that to Allegheny. The EWS Tax Department structured the acquisition of the respective equipment to either avoid the Sales/Use tax or to spread the cost of such tax over time (for example, a sales-leaseback strategy was employed in Illinois to spread the cost of the Sales/Use tax over many years as lease payments are made rather than pay it up front). Ultimately, we benefitted from this since we did not use as much cash in constructing the Peakers and earned more from the disposition of the Peakers than we otherwise would have since the counterparty would have (and we believe did in the specific case of Allegheny) modelled the cost of the Peakers as including the full current payment of such Sales/Use tax. That said, we have requested that a portion of the disposition proceeds from the sale of the Peakers be reserved until the applicable statute of limitations related to the types of strategies that were employed to achieve the above described results expires since there is risk that our position could be challenged and, if challenged, there is a risk that we would not prevail. Matt is out until May 8 (he is a recent father of a baby girl) but upon his return is available with me to discuss this matter with whomever you would like. Matt has worked closely with Don and others in the Generation Asset group and has assured me that the suggested reserve is a sound (not overly conservative nor liberal) position. Best regards. Steve.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kitchen, Louise
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 3:18 PM
To: Matthew F Gockerman/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Cc: Stephen H Douglas/HOU/ECT@ENRON; Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ENRON
Subject: Tax reserve on Allegheny Peakers
I notice that our gain has substantially decreased due to a tax reserve increase of $5m. Why has this been added and why so recently?
Regards
Louise | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
I'll attend in person. Tx Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: Fleming, Rosalee
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 7:06 AM
To: Bowen Jr., Raymond; Buy, Rick; Causey, Richard; Delainey, David W.; Derrick Jr., James; Dietrich, Janet; Fallon, Jim; Haedicke, Mark E.; Horton, Stanley; Hughes, James A.; Koenig, Mark; Lay, Kenneth; McMahon, Jeffrey; Sherriff, John; Whalley, Greg
Cc: Blackwood, Connie; Chapman, Kay; Elbertson, Janette; Ford, Sue; Harris, Stephanie J ; Heathman, Karen K.; Marshall, Lucy; Mendez, Yorleni; Schiller, Marsha; Stark, Cindy; Taylor, Liz; Valencia, Laura; Wells, Tori L.; Westbrook, Sharron
Subject: Enron Management Committee Meeting, Monday, January 7, 2002 @ 11:00 a.m.
Importance: High
Please let me know as soon as possible if you can attend this meeting in person or if you want to call-in. I will provide the call-in number.
Thanks.
Rosie | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
APRIL 13, 2001: We have received the executed EEI Master Power Purchase and
Sale Agreement dated 4/10/01 from the referenced CP. Copies will be
distributed to Legal and Credit. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
eSource presents free Dow Jones Interactive training
Attend one of our Dow Jones Interactive Personalizing/Customizing DJI and
Custom Clips Clinics:
April 13 9:00 - 10:00 PM EB564
10:00 - 11:00 PM EB564
11:00 - 12:00 PM EB564
Seats fill up fast! To reserve a seat, please call Stephanie E. Taylor at
5-7928
The cost is $25.00 Per Person
No Shows will be charged $50.00
* Please bring your Dow Jones Interactive login ID and password. If you don't
have one, a guest ID will be provided.
Check the eSource training page at http://esource.enron.com/training.doc for
additional training sessions and vendor presentations
http://esource.enron.com | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Thanks for the note, that was very sweet of you. I always believe in helping
wherever I can, b/c the next day it'll be me! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
If you need it, I've got a contract brief that lists the transport cost and
fuel from each location (there numerous receipt points). It is possible that
we may need to purchase extra gas for the plant on occasion. In that case,
we can use the same transport contract on Lone Star and transport on other
pipes also. Any expense we incur to deliver gas to the plant will be passed
on to the plant.
If you have any questions, let me know.
D
Katherine Benedict
11/22/2000 11:23 AM
To: Daren J Farmer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cornhusker
Hi Darrin,
This is what Mark McCoy sent me about the Cornhusker Deal. Please review and
if there is anything else that Rita Wynne or I need to know about this deal,
just shoot me an e-mail!
Thanks for calling me back!
Happy Thanksgiving,
Kathy
---------------------- Forwarded by Katherine Benedict/HOU/ECT on 11/22/2000
11:19 AM ---------------------------
Mark McCoy@ENRON
11/22/2000 08:12 AM
To: Katherine Benedict/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cornhusker
Kathy-----Here is what I know about Cornhusker:
Our supply comes from Apache & Williams
Our market typicially is the plant (Tenaska IV Partners)
If the plant is down, Brazos Utility has the right to the gas if they want it
If Brazos does not call for the gas, then we will sell off to whomever we can
We just get a flat fee on this gas per MMBtu, whether it goes to the plant or
not
Daren Farmer knows the specifics about the deal
Hope this helps, call with any questions.
Mark
x33396 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Kate
please check. still missing:
PREBON:
Richter:
Enron buys Aquila
236.00
May np 15
25mws
Enron Sells pget
may np 15
25 mws
237.00
Enron Sells aquila
june np 15
25 mws
275.00
please ch price on deal 551260.01 to 227.00
Amerex:
still missing:
Richter
Enron sells Mirant
apr np 15 170.00 off peak
Enron sells aquila
june peak np 15
275.00
Enron sells mirant
25 mws
3/19-3/31
265.00
np15 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from rly-yg05.mx.aol.com (rly-yg05.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.5]) by
air-yg04.mail.aol.com (v76_r1.23) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:12:50 -0400
Received: from postmaster.enron.com (outbound5.enron.com [192.152.140.9]) by
rly-yg05.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 18:12:42 -0400
Received: from nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com ([172.28.10.39]) by
postmaster.enron.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/postmaster-1.00) with ESMTP id RAA23489 for
<[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:12:42 -0500 (CDT)
From: [email protected]
Received: from ene-mta01.enron.com (unverified) by
nahou-msmsw03px.corp.enron.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP
id <[email protected]> for
<[email protected]>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:12:45 -0500
Subject: Re: INFORMS National conference at San Antonio
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 17:12:41 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ENE-MTA01/Enron(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21
March 2000) at 10/27/2000 05:08:55 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Unknown
---------------------- Forwarded by Vince J Kaminski/HOU/ECT on 10/27/2000
05:19 PM ---------------------------
Shijie Deng <[email protected]> on 10/16/2000 11:00:46 AM
To: Fernando Alvarado <[email protected]>, Vince Kaminski
<[email protected]>, "John R. Birge"
<[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected]
cc: Shijie Deng <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: INFORMS National conference at San Antonio
Hi,
Details of our session info. at the INFORMS conference can be found at the
following link. It'll be in the afternoon of 11/6 (Monday).
http://www.informs.org/Conf/SanAntonio2000//TALKS/MD29.html
Since we have 5 speakers, I expect each of us will have no more than 20
minutes to present. Please keep that in mind and e-mail me if you have
any questions. Please also inform me if there will be any changes. Look
forward to seeing you all in San Antonio.
Best regards,
Shijie
Shi-Jie Deng
Assistant Professor
School of ISyE
Georgia Institute of Technology
Office Phone: (404) 894-6519
E-mail: [email protected]
Home page: http://www.isye.gatech.edu/~deng | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 4/26/01; HourAhead hour: 17; No ancillary schedules awarded. No
variances detected.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001042617.txt
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
*** Final schedule not found for preferred schedule.
Details:
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTRT
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/26/01
TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
INTERCHG_ID: CISO_EPMI_DESERT
ENGY_TYPE: NFRM | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
This meeting should be on Geoff's calendar too.
---------------------- Forwarded by Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT on 03/12/2001
12:37 PM ---------------------------
From: Richard Tomaski@ENRON on 03/12/2001 12:09 PM
To: Hunter S Shively/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Gregg Penman/Corp/Enron@Enron, Laura Luce/Corp/Enron@Enron
Subject: Re: ENA supply contract
Lets do it tomorrow at 10:30
Hunter S Shively@ECT
03/12/2001 12:03 PM
To: Richard Tomaski/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Re: ENA supply contract
ASAP - Tomorrow mid-morning would probably best for me but let me know | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Kay and Reagan,
I've gone through the MDEA contract and have some comments. Do you want to
get together tomorrow and go over the contract and hear how Reagan's meeting
went?
Let me know.
Heather | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi Don,
It was great meeting you this morning and I look forward to working with you!
I wanted to follow-up on the two most critical outstanding issues currently
and get an idea on when you expect to have some information.
(1) City counsel (Anthony Hall?) - Would I be exempt from access by the
public and be considered a private entity similar to executive recruitment
firms?
(2) List of names and telephone numbers of Fire Department personnel we
should speak to
The telephone message I left for you earlier today was also regarding this
matter.
Thanks,
Lisa Connolly
713-345-4840
713-569-9563 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 1/19/02; HourAhead hour: 13; HourAhead schedule download failed. Manual intervention required.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final Schedules\2002011913.txt
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
!!!Unknown database.
Alias: dbCaps97Data
Error: dbCaps97Data: Cannot perform this operation on a closed database | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
July 23, 2000
Previous Numbers :
Teco Tap 50.000 / HPL IFERC ; 10.000 / Enron
LS HPL LSK IC 30.000 / Enron
Corrected Numbers:
Teco Tap 45.000 / HPL IFERC ; 10.000 / Enron
LS HPL LSK IC 30.000 / Enron
July 28, 2000
Previous Numbers:
Teco Tap 10.000 / Enron ; 61.250 / HPL IFERC ; 8.750 / HPL Gas
Daily
LS HPL LSK IC 30.000 / Enron
Corrected Numbers:
Teco Tap 10.000 / Enron ; 66.250 / HPL IFERC ; 3.750 / HPL Gas
Daily
LS HPL LSK IC 30.000 / Enron | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Brent,
Attached is the confirmation for serving Smurfit's plants in southern California for December 1, 2001 through March 31, 2002. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Kim Ward
Manager, West Gas Origination | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We look forward to seeing everyone!
- don's birthday invitation.exe | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is a memo regarding the above-referenced meeting. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Today we announced the appointment of Jeff McMahon as Enron's chief financial officer. In my continued discussions with the financial community yesterday and today, it became clear that this move was required to restore investor confidence. Jeff has unparalleled qualifications and a deep and thorough understanding of Enron. He is already on the job and hard at work on the issues before us. Andy Fastow will be on a leave of absence from the company.
Jeff had been serving as chairman and CEO of Enron Industrial Markets. He joined Enron in 1994 and spent three years in the London office as chief financial officer for Enron's European operations. Upon returning to the U.S., Jeff was executive vice president of finance and treasurer for Enron Corp. In 2000, he was named president and chief operating officer of Enron Net Works.
I know all of you are concerned about the continuing decline in our share price. I am too, and we are working very hard to turn it around. Appointing Jeff as CFO is one important step in that process. But most of the solution involves just continuing to do our jobs with excellence. The fundamentals of our business are strong, and I think the market will begin to see that as we continue to perform.
Please join me in giving Jeff your full support, and thank you for all of your continued hard work. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Brenda
It strikes me that the planning documentation could be enormously useful to
us in backtesting our existing processes and determining any potential
overlaps
Is there any obstacle to access to this information ?
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: Brenda F Herod 23/01/2001 23:40
To: Andrew Cornfield/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Wallace/LON/ECT@ECT, John
Jacobsen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Roy Lipsett/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael E Moscoso/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Kristen J Hanson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Yvette G Connevey/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jill
Lafave/ENRON@enronXgate, Delmar Davis/ENRON@enronXgate, Daniel
Hamilton/ENRON@enronXgate
Subject: Re: Metals
Andy,
Thanks so much for your message. I had you on my "To Do" list today to
follow-up from our conversation last week. I appreciate your responses, and
will follow-up as needed.
Just to recap EIM's current inititives.
PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PWC) was engaged in 10/00 to develop a business plan
for tactical and strategic solutions for the projected growth in the physical
business. In 11/00, AA was engaged to develop a "Blueprint" of EIM major
processes (Deal Execution, Deal Capture, Risk Management, Logistics,
Settlements and Financial Reporting), down to level 2 processes. The
initiatives have been combined into one team focused on delivering the
"Blueprint", a gap analysis of Enron systems to business needs and
recommended systems. A complete "roadmap" should be laid out with a
0-3months, 4-6months, 7-9 months and 10-12months timeline. The plan
addresses tactical also.
Our overall objective: Build an infrastructure (people, processes and
systems) that is scalable and supports the trading business of EIM. The
current industries are Forest Products and Steel. However, additional
industries may be added. The targeted infrastructure would require little
change to support new industries.
The delieverable is expected by the end of 2/01. We'd be happy to visit with
you all (video conference or Houston,....) to give you more information. Let
me know how to proceed.
Thanks again for your time. Since I wasn't able to attend the Controllers'
Conference last 10/00, I'm glad I got to meet you last week. Stay in touch.
Brenda
To: Brenda F Herod/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Mike Jordan/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Wallace/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Metals
Brenda
As discussed at our meeting last week there are a few areas of commonality
between Enron Metals and EIM that should allow leverage off common goals.
In particular I promised info on a few areas:
Project Q assessment
A lot of the issues raised in the report are particular to Enron Metals
(being to do with interfaces with our AS400 ysstem) however high level issues
which formed part of the decision to not develop this for Enron metals were:
Q is over specified for metals. Traffic / logistics for metals is less
complex than oil & coal.
Metals process tends towards Buy>Store>Sell whereas for liquids the storage
is not as prevelant
Metals logistics typically involves trucks whereas liquids is ship/barge
2. Inventory Controls
Again the reports produced here have been very specific to Enron Metals. Paul
Wallace a manager in the co-ordination function is working extensively on
developing the controls in this area. I would suggest that you contact Paul
directly if you wish to discuss specific areas or inventory controls in
general.
3. Funding of inventory
We have a structured finance facility here in London. The deal is specific to
Enron Metals markets in that it works by reference to LME prices as these are
the base index for all the positions placed in the facility. If structured
financing is sort for EIM then it would be appropriate to talk to either
David Tregar (Metals Commercial) or Bill Appleby (Global Finance) as an intro
to the issues faced.
4. Curve Management Process
The markets in which our merchanting division trades are based on the LME
curves but are linked to a large number of basis curves for quality and
location. Given the vast number we have opted to break down the markets by
brand group and port location. E.G. for Copper this means we have a grid with
5 brand groups and 3 sets of port groups (13 for europe, 7 for the US and 6
for the Far East). The maintaince & price testing of the grids is made
manageable by the fact the premiums only need be entered for brand and port
groups by the traders yet prices can be tested by reference to node points
i.e. price of specific brand at a given location which can be checked to a
market quote.
5. Re recruitment of paper traders
I haven't been able to contact him but I recall that the brother of David
Rosenblum, one of the metals traders in Chicago, is a trader of recylced
paper.
I'll keep you posted on long term system development plans here in London.
I'd appreciate same for EIM.
Regards
Andy | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
We had our daily phone call with NW. I don't know that we really have
significant points of disagreement. They understand that we are working
some accounting issues, and they have a general idea of what we want to do.
I suggested that we come up with the work arounds with our accountants, and I
will think about it this weekend. I have a couple of ideas but I really want
to mull it over.
They look forward to receiving the turbine contract. Chris, could you
forward the draft change orders with it?
One point they raised is that they want the ability (with GE consent) to have
us refund the future payment due to GE (less 7% for time value of money),
retaining the payment obligation. All of this is post closing. They are
putting up a full blown parent guaranty to GE for the turbine contract, and
since the payment should only be around $4mm, that would probably be
acceptable to GE.
Keffer et al will issue revised documents tonight. There are no calls
scheduled tomorrow or this weekend, giving everyone "quiet time" to review
the contract. Other than the accting issues, this should be about it.
We deferred discussions about an extension until Monday.
Kay | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 11/08/2000
11:50 AM ---------------------------
[email protected] on 11/08/2000 11:19:27 AM
To: [email protected]
cc:
Subject: Approval for reviewer
JOSEY,SCOTT D has suggested reviewers and submitted them for your approval.
You may review/modify this list of reviewers by logging on to PEP at
http://pep.corp.enron.com and going to Supervisor Services. Please
remember, no feedback can be completed on JOSEY,SCOTT D until you have
approved the list. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: Mayeux, Gay
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:01 AM
To: Palmer, Mark A. (PR); Denne, Karen
Subject: CC Script Final Draft
_________________________
Gay Mayeux
Vice President, Investor Relations
Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street, EB 4931a
Houston, Texas 77002
Phone: 713-853-9905
Cell: 713-416-8821
Fax: 713-646-3002
email: [email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Congrats on your promotion. It was well deserved! | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The attached model has the RAROC and COS model in the various spreadsheet.
The rates I gave on the matrix and the COS rate track for the 500 MMBTU/d
expansion at the $613,500M unleveraged. We would experience negative
depreciation for the first five years of the project. Under the 70/30 debt
equity scenario we would have a rate about $.58 and that tracks with the DCF
model, and we would have escalating depreciation rates over the term of the
project. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Attached is the final version. Please forward to Black Hills. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The next US Regulatory call is scheduled for Friday, November 9, 2001 at 10
am.
Agenda
Bankruptcy Reform - strategy discussion
Call Details
DIAL IN #: (888) 904-9318
PASSCODE: USREG
LEADER: Stacy Carey
Stacy Carey
Policy Director
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
600 5th Avenue, 27th Floor
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY 10020
(212) 332-1202 ph
(212) 332-1212 fax
(917) 543-9622 cell
[email protected] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Icon Information Consultants
2424 W. Loop South
Ste. 525
Houston, Tx 77027
713-438-0919
713-438-0930 (fax)
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
1. Enron response to various PG&E gas matters (see Mike Day attachment below)
Gas Receivables request of PG&E
TURN/ORA Petition Diversion
2. Legislative Update
3. CRA On-Site Generation Language
4. Enron's Reponse to CDWR RFB (see attachment) [Other Parties Comments]
5. Cal PX Security / Collateral Update - Travis McCullough update
6. Bankruptcy News
7. Other
Please feel free to send me any updates or additions.
Jim | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
FYI.
Jim
----- Forwarded by James D Steffes/NA/Enron on 03/14/2001 08:22 AM -----
"Ronald Carroll" <[email protected]>
03/13/2001 05:08 PM
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc: "Andrea Settanni" <[email protected]>, "Jeffrey Watkiss"
<[email protected]>, "Kimberly Curry" <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: Status of California Cases
Jim/Richard:
Per your request, I have attached a memo that describes the status of Enron's
participation in cases concerning the California investigation and related
market issues established since FERC's December 15, 2000 order, including
cases for which the date for intervention has not yet passed. Please call me
if you wish to discuss or have any questions.
Ron
- 0139365.01 | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
bought 2700/d cal 03 hcs flat from aes new market through tradition | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Here's the last shot of Hef's present to Cameron when she was born. I think
you all have seen it at the Dome at some point in your visits there. It
lasted almost thirty-two years.
.
- teddybear2.jpg | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Theresa,
Attached is the revised reconciliation with the corrected variable rate.
John
John A. Cogan
The Johnco Group, LLC
3629 Lake Kristin Drive
Gretna, LA 70056
(504) 392-7557 Home/Office
(504) 491-2874 Cell
(208) 730-4713 Fax | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Jinbaek,
Great, I look forward to working with you.
Please, call me during the next few days
(713) 853 3848 and we can chat about the projects.
Please, contact Molly Magee to talk about the first day
orientation program. Her E-mail address
is [email protected], and her phone number is
(713) 853-4804.
Vince
-----Original Message-----
From: Jinbaek Kim <[email protected]>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-Jinbaek+20Kim+20+3Cjinbaek+40ieor+2Eberkeley+2Eedu+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 8:07 PM
To: Kaminski, Vince J
Subject: Hi,
Dr. Kaminski
How are you?
The process for starting summer work is going well,
and there will be no problem we start work
on May 30.
I got a place to live, and reserved a flight.
I'm going to leave for Houston on May 29
(expected time to arrival is around noon)
I am very much excited to have opportunity
to join the project making an exchange platform.
I think it's time I'd better remind you
of scheduling a meeting with me,
sometime on May 30.
I hope you let me know what to to
after I arrive at Houston.
And please let me know if you have anything
you think I prepare, to get better outcome
from the summer work.
If you give me a brief on the work,
it would be a great help for me to decide
which material I should carry from here to Houston.
I look forward to the date we meet,
Warm regards,
Jinbaek
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jinbaek Kim
Ph.D Candidate
Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
U.C.Berkeley
http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~jinbaek
Go Bears!
:"'._..---.._.'"; `. .' .' `.
: a a : __....._
: _.-0-._ :---'""'"-....--'" '.
: .' : `. : `,`.
`.: '--'--' :.' ; ;
: `._`-'_.' ;.'
`. '"' ;
`. ' ;
`. ` : ` ;
.`. ; ; : ;
.' `-.' ; : ;`.
__.' .' .' : ; `.
.' __.' .'`--..__ _._.' ; ;
`......' .' `'""'`.' ;......-'
`.......-' `........' | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
-----Original Message-----
From: Tripp, Garrett
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:25 AM
To: Zufferli, John; Milnthorp, Rob
Subject: Ontario overview
To continue getting familiar with Ontario, please review the document OEFC_demandSupp_UBS.ppt on your I:/common/OEFC directory. It is a presentation we gave to OEFC in the fall.
Here is a spreadsheet with additional information.
Some intertie information may vary from source to source. This is due to the IMO's regular small adjustments to the capacity numbers.
GT | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please sign me up for the garage sale.
Thank you.
Debbie Foster 908 Bomar
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>. | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Start Date: 4/17/01; HourAhead hour: 9; No ancillary schedules awarded.
Variances detected.
Variances detected in Energy Import/Export schedule.
LOG MESSAGES:
PARSING FILE -->> O:\Portland\WestDesk\California Scheduling\ISO Final
Schedules\2001041709.txt
Error retrieving price data (Record/Key deleted.
Record is deleted.
Table) - process continuing...
---- Energy Import/Export Schedule ----
$$$ Variance found in table tblINTCHG_IMPEXP.
Details: (Hour: 9 / Preferred: 12.00 / Final: 11.98)
TRANS_TYPE: FINAL
SC_ID: ECTRT
MKT_TYPE: 2
TRANS_DATE: 4/17/01
TIE_POINT: PVERDE_5_DEVERS
INTERCHG_ID: EPMI_CISO_ERNIE
ENGY_TYPE: WHEEL | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Hi. I will not be able to attend because I'm dislocated my ankle and I'm
crutchin it now.
[email protected] on 03/03/2000 12:17:47 PM
To: [email protected]
cc: (bcc: Chris Germany/HOU/ECT)
Subject: Spring Meeting
Hello all - sorry for the delay in the agenda. We've had some discussions
here
about what to include and it has changed several times!!!
I will attach it and also cut/past it to the end of this e-mail. I have
already
heard from some of you - but if you have not, please let me know if
you will be able to attend. Thanks!! I'm looking forward to seeing everyone.
Twyla
(See attached file: Board Agenda 3-00.lwp)
E-SCRIPT Customer Advisory Board
AGENDA
March 21, 2000
Pittsburgh, PA
I. E-SCRIPT Capacity Release Web Update
II. E-SCRIPT Changes
a. Changes in reservation billing
b. Daily Volumes Tab
III. Order 637
IV. Delivery Point Operator
V. Customer Access to Pool Imbalance Reports
VI. New Organization
VII. Open Discussion - Issues, Problems, etc.
Lunch will be provided. Attire is business casual.
Please call Twyla Strogen at 304-623-8581 with
questions.
- Board Agenda 3-00.lwp | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
itsImazing Network Thank you for your continued participation in the itsImazing Network. We hope you are finding our offers valuable. As part of our corporate initiatives, we strive to provide other exciting opportunities for our membership, like the one below.
Free College Money! Need money for college? Use FastWeb's FREE Scholarship Search! Click Now! http://itsimazing.net/Link/1/976E3AC7-7875-431C-841E-D85197DEB2EB Search over 600,000 scholarships worth over $1 Billion. FastWeb is recommended by over 3,000 colleges and 13,000 high schools. Let FastWeb help you find scholarships to help you pay for college. Completely Free. Search Now! http://itsimazing.net/Link/1/976E3AC7-7875-431C-841E-D85197DEB2EB Best Wishes, The FastWeb Scholarship Team
This offer is brought to you as a member of the itsImazing Network. If you do not wish to receive future promotions from itsImazing, click on the link below to unsubscribe. http://itsimazing.net/remove/976E3AC7-7875-431C-841E-D85197DEB2EB
[IMAGE] | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
----- Forwarded by Jeff Dasovich/NA/Enron on 10/25/2000 12:22 PM -----
Mary Hain@ECT
10/25/2000 11:01 AM
To: James D Steffes/NA/Enron@Enron, [email protected], Mona Petrochko,
Susan J Mara/SFO/EES@EES, Sarah Novosel/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Joe Hartsoe@Enron,
Dennis Benevides, Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Cooper Richey/PDX/ECT@ECT, Robert
Badeer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Richter/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Draft response to CMUA paper
The attached draft answers the California Municipal Utilities Association
complaint that California markets are not workably competitive and therefore
FERC should establish cost-based rates. In its complaint, CMUA argued that
the market isn't workably competitive because the prices were higher this
summer than in previous years even in hours where demand was no higher.
Seabron's paper shows that high prices have resulted from a number of
unrelated structural and market design factors and increasing attempts at
regulatory intervention. Our answer is due at FERC tomorrow so please get me
your comments ASAP.
---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 10/25/2000 08:48 AM
---------------------------
Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
From: "Sabine Schnittger" <[email protected]>
10/25/2000 08:23 AM
To: "Mary C Hain" <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: Draft response to CMUA paper
Mary:
Please find attached a first draft of Enron's response to the CMUA, please
let us know your comments.
Seabron can be contacted on his cell-phone (617 513 5904) this morning, but
will be in the office at noon. Alternatively, you could pass on comments to
me.
Are you or is one of our staff able to assist us with a reference to the
claim that hydro water levels were low in California this year?
Best wishes,
Sabine.
------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me at
(617) 354-0060 and permanently delete the original and any copy of any
e-mail and any printout thereof.
Sabine Schnittger
Managing Consultant
Frontier Economics
Two Brattle Square
Cambridge, MA 02138
Office tel: (617) 354-0060
Office fax: (617) 354-0640
Mobile: (617) 480-5992
Email: [email protected]
http://www.frontier-economics.com
- 00-10-26-SA-SS draft.doc | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
The weekly conference call will take place at 1:30 p.m. CDT on Wednesday,
June 6, 2001. EB38C1 has been reserved for those of you in Houston.
Dial In: 1-888-285-4585
Participant: 536220
Host: 121970 (Sheila) | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Please read the attached invitation and RSVP to Sherryl Stone (Ph:
713-646-7601 or [email protected]). | {
"pile_set_name": "Enron Emails"
} |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.