chunk_id
stringlengths 3
9
| chunk
stringlengths 1
100
|
---|---|
9858_73 | previously, had not been in the same analytical grouping. According to the scholar of esotericism |
9858_74 | Wouter J. Hanegraaff, the term provided a "useful generic label" for "a large and complicated group |
9858_75 | of historical phenomena that had long been perceived as sharing an air de famille." |
9858_76 | Various academics have emphasised that esotericism is a phenomenon unique to the Western world. As |
9858_77 | Faivre stated, an "empirical perspective" would hold that "esotericism is a Western notion." As |
9858_78 | scholars such as Faivre and Hanegraaff have pointed out, there is no comparable category of |
9858_79 | "Eastern" or "Oriental" esotericism. The emphasis on Western esotericism was nevertheless primarily |
9858_80 | devised to distinguish the field from a universal esotericism. Hanegraaff has characterised these |
9858_81 | as "recognisable world views and approaches to knowledge that have played an important though |
9858_82 | always controversial role in the history of Western culture". Historian of religion Henrik Bogdan |
9858_83 | asserted that Western esotericism constituted "a third pillar of Western culture" alongside |
9858_84 | "doctrinal faith and rationality", being deemed heretical by the former and irrational by the |
9858_85 | latter. Scholars nevertheless recognise that various non-Western traditions have exerted "a |
9858_86 | profound influence" over Western esotericism, citing the prominent example of the Theosophical |
9858_87 | Society's incorporation of Hindu and Buddhist concepts like reincarnation into its doctrines. Given |
9858_88 | these influences and the imprecise nature of the term "Western", the scholar of esotericism Kennet |
9858_89 | Granholm has argued that academics should cease referring to "Western esotericism" altogether, |
9858_90 | instead simply favouring "esotericism" as a descriptor of this phenomenon. Egil Asprem has endorsed |
9858_91 | this approach. |
9858_92 | Definition |
9858_93 | The historian of esotericism Antoine Faivre noted that "never a precise term, [esotericism] has |
9858_94 | begun to overflow its boundaries on all sides", with both Faivre and Karen-Claire Voss stating that |
9858_95 | Western esotericism consists of "a vast spectrum of authors, trends, works of philosophy, religion, |
9858_96 | art, literature, and music". |
9858_97 | Scholars broadly agree on which currents of thought fall within a category of esotericism—ranging |
9858_98 | from ancient Gnosticism and Hermetism through to Rosicrucianism and the Kabbalah and on to more |
9858_99 | recent phenomenon such as the New Age movement. Nevertheless, esotericism itself remains a |
9858_100 | controversial term, with scholars specialising in the subject disagreeing as to best define it. |
9858_101 | Esotericism as a universal, secret, inner tradition |
9858_102 | Some scholars have used Western esotericism to refer to "inner traditions" concerned with a |
9858_103 | "universal spiritual dimension of reality, as opposed to the merely external ('exoteric') religious |
9858_104 | institutions and dogmatic systems of established religions." This approach views Western |
9858_105 | esotericism as just one variant of a worldwide esotericism at the heart of all world religions and |
9858_106 | cultures, reflecting a hidden esoteric reality. This use is closest to the original meaning of the |
9858_107 | word in late antiquity, where it applied to secret spiritual teachings that were reserved for a |
9858_108 | specific elite and hidden from the masses. This definition was popularised in the published work of |
9858_109 | nineteenth-century esotericists like A.E. Waite, who sought to combine their own mystical beliefs |
9858_110 | with a historical interpretation of esotericism. It subsequently became a popular approach within |
9858_111 | several esoteric movements, most notably Martinism and Traditionalism. |
9858_112 | This definition, originally developed by esotericists themselves, became popular among French |
9858_113 | academics during the 1980s, exerting a strong influence over the scholars Mircea Eliade, Henry |
9858_114 | Corbin, and the early work of Faivre. Within the academic field of religious studies, those who |
9858_115 | study different religions in search of an inner universal dimension to them all are termed |
9858_116 | "religionists". Such religionist ideas also exerted an influence on more recent scholars like |
9858_117 | Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke and Arthur Versluis. |
9858_118 | Versluis for instance defined "Western esotericism" as "inner or hidden spiritual knowledge |
9858_119 | transmitted through Western European historical currents that in turn feed into North American and |
9858_120 | other non-European settings". He added that these Western esoteric currents all shared a core |
9858_121 | characteristic, "a claim to gnosis, or direct spiritual insight into cosmology or spiritual |
9858_122 | insight", and accordingly he suggested that these currents could be referred to as "Western |
9858_123 | gnostic" just as much as "Western esoteric". |
9858_124 | There are various problems with this model for understanding Western esotericism. The most |
9858_125 | significant is that it rests upon the conviction that there really is a "universal, hidden, |
9858_126 | esoteric dimension of reality" that objectively exists. The existence of this universal inner |
9858_127 | tradition has not been discovered through scientific or scholarly enquiry; this had led some to |
9858_128 | claim that it does not exist, though Hanegraaff thought it better to adopt a view based in |
9858_129 | methodological agnosticism by stating that "we simply do not know - and cannot know" if it exists |
9858_130 | or not. He noted that, even if such a true and absolute nature of reality really existed, it would |
9858_131 | only be accessible through "esoteric" spiritual practices, and could not be discovered or measured |
9858_132 | by the "exoteric" tools of scientific and scholarly enquiry. Hanegraaff pointed out that an |
9858_133 | approach that seeks a common inner hidden core of all esoteric currents masks that such groups |
9858_134 | often differ greatly, being rooted in their own historical and social contexts and expressing |
9858_135 | mutually exclusive ideas and agendas. A third issue was that many of those currents widely |
9858_136 | recognised as esoteric never concealed their teachings, and in the twentieth century came to |
9858_137 | permeate popular culture, thus problematizing the claim that esotericism could be defined by its |
9858_138 | hidden and secretive nature. Moreover, Hanegraaff noted that when scholars adopt this definition, |
9858_139 | it shows that they subscribe to the religious doctrines espoused by the very groups they are |
9858_140 | studying. |
9858_141 | Esotericism as an enchanted world view |
9858_142 | Another approach to Western esotericism treats it as a world view that embraces "enchantment" in |
9858_143 | contrast to world views influenced by post-Cartesian, post-Newtonian, and positivist science that |
9858_144 | sought to "dis-enchant" the world. That approach understands esotericism as comprising those world |
9858_145 | views that eschew a belief in instrumental causality and instead adopt a belief that all parts of |
9858_146 | the universe are interrelated without a need for causal chains. It stands as a radical alternative |
9858_147 | to the disenchanted world views that have dominated Western culture since the scientific |
9858_148 | revolution, and must therefore always be at odds with secular culture. |
9858_149 | An early exponent of this definition was the historian of Renaissance thought Frances Yates in her |
9858_150 | discussions of a Hermetic Tradition, which she saw as an "enchanted" alternative to established |
9858_151 | religion and rationalistic science. However, the primary exponent of this view was Faivre, who |
9858_152 | published a series of criteria for how to define "Western esotericism" in 1992. Faivre claimed that |
9858_153 | esotericism was "identifiable by the presence of six fundamental characteristics or components", |
9858_154 | four of which were "intrinsic" and thus vital to defining something as being esoteric, while the |
9858_155 | other two were "secondary" and thus not necessarily present in every form of esotericism. He listed |
9858_156 | these characteristics as follows: |
9858_157 | "Correspondences": This is the idea that there are both real and symbolic correspondences existing |
9858_158 | between all things within the universe. As examples for this, Faivre pointed to the esoteric |
9858_159 | concept of the macrocosm and microcosm, often presented as the dictum of "as above, so below", as |
9858_160 | well as the astrological idea that the actions of the planets have a direct corresponding influence |
9858_161 | on the behaviour of human beings. |
9858_162 | "Living Nature": Faivre argued that all esotericists envision the natural universe as being imbued |
9858_163 | with its own life force, and that as such they understand it as being "complex, plural, |
9858_164 | hierarchical". |
9858_165 | "Imagination and Mediations": Faivre believed that all esotericists place great emphasis on both |
9858_166 | the human imagination, and mediations—"such as rituals, symbolic images, mandalas, intermediary |
9858_167 | spirits"—and mantras as tools that provide access to worlds and levels of reality existing between |
9858_168 | the material world and the divine. |
9858_169 | "Experience of Transmutation": Faivre's fourth intrinsic characteristic of esotericism was the |
9858_170 | emphasis that esotericists place on fundamentally transforming themselves through their practice, |
9858_171 | for instance through the spiritual transformation that is alleged to accompany the attainment of |
9858_172 | gnosis. |
Subsets and Splits