chunk_id
stringlengths
3
9
chunk
stringlengths
1
100
9858_73
previously, had not been in the same analytical grouping. According to the scholar of esotericism
9858_74
Wouter J. Hanegraaff, the term provided a "useful generic label" for "a large and complicated group
9858_75
of historical phenomena that had long been perceived as sharing an air de famille."
9858_76
Various academics have emphasised that esotericism is a phenomenon unique to the Western world. As
9858_77
Faivre stated, an "empirical perspective" would hold that "esotericism is a Western notion." As
9858_78
scholars such as Faivre and Hanegraaff have pointed out, there is no comparable category of
9858_79
"Eastern" or "Oriental" esotericism. The emphasis on Western esotericism was nevertheless primarily
9858_80
devised to distinguish the field from a universal esotericism. Hanegraaff has characterised these
9858_81
as "recognisable world views and approaches to knowledge that have played an important though
9858_82
always controversial role in the history of Western culture". Historian of religion Henrik Bogdan
9858_83
asserted that Western esotericism constituted "a third pillar of Western culture" alongside
9858_84
"doctrinal faith and rationality", being deemed heretical by the former and irrational by the
9858_85
latter. Scholars nevertheless recognise that various non-Western traditions have exerted "a
9858_86
profound influence" over Western esotericism, citing the prominent example of the Theosophical
9858_87
Society's incorporation of Hindu and Buddhist concepts like reincarnation into its doctrines. Given
9858_88
these influences and the imprecise nature of the term "Western", the scholar of esotericism Kennet
9858_89
Granholm has argued that academics should cease referring to "Western esotericism" altogether,
9858_90
instead simply favouring "esotericism" as a descriptor of this phenomenon. Egil Asprem has endorsed
9858_91
this approach.
9858_92
Definition
9858_93
The historian of esotericism Antoine Faivre noted that "never a precise term, [esotericism] has
9858_94
begun to overflow its boundaries on all sides", with both Faivre and Karen-Claire Voss stating that
9858_95
Western esotericism consists of "a vast spectrum of authors, trends, works of philosophy, religion,
9858_96
art, literature, and music".
9858_97
Scholars broadly agree on which currents of thought fall within a category of esotericism—ranging
9858_98
from ancient Gnosticism and Hermetism through to Rosicrucianism and the Kabbalah and on to more
9858_99
recent phenomenon such as the New Age movement. Nevertheless, esotericism itself remains a
9858_100
controversial term, with scholars specialising in the subject disagreeing as to best define it.
9858_101
Esotericism as a universal, secret, inner tradition
9858_102
Some scholars have used Western esotericism to refer to "inner traditions" concerned with a
9858_103
"universal spiritual dimension of reality, as opposed to the merely external ('exoteric') religious
9858_104
institutions and dogmatic systems of established religions." This approach views Western
9858_105
esotericism as just one variant of a worldwide esotericism at the heart of all world religions and
9858_106
cultures, reflecting a hidden esoteric reality. This use is closest to the original meaning of the
9858_107
word in late antiquity, where it applied to secret spiritual teachings that were reserved for a
9858_108
specific elite and hidden from the masses. This definition was popularised in the published work of
9858_109
nineteenth-century esotericists like A.E. Waite, who sought to combine their own mystical beliefs
9858_110
with a historical interpretation of esotericism. It subsequently became a popular approach within
9858_111
several esoteric movements, most notably Martinism and Traditionalism.
9858_112
This definition, originally developed by esotericists themselves, became popular among French
9858_113
academics during the 1980s, exerting a strong influence over the scholars Mircea Eliade, Henry
9858_114
Corbin, and the early work of Faivre. Within the academic field of religious studies, those who
9858_115
study different religions in search of an inner universal dimension to them all are termed
9858_116
"religionists". Such religionist ideas also exerted an influence on more recent scholars like
9858_117
Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke and Arthur Versluis.
9858_118
Versluis for instance defined "Western esotericism" as "inner or hidden spiritual knowledge
9858_119
transmitted through Western European historical currents that in turn feed into North American and
9858_120
other non-European settings". He added that these Western esoteric currents all shared a core
9858_121
characteristic, "a claim to gnosis, or direct spiritual insight into cosmology or spiritual
9858_122
insight", and accordingly he suggested that these currents could be referred to as "Western
9858_123
gnostic" just as much as "Western esoteric".
9858_124
There are various problems with this model for understanding Western esotericism. The most
9858_125
significant is that it rests upon the conviction that there really is a "universal, hidden,
9858_126
esoteric dimension of reality" that objectively exists. The existence of this universal inner
9858_127
tradition has not been discovered through scientific or scholarly enquiry; this had led some to
9858_128
claim that it does not exist, though Hanegraaff thought it better to adopt a view based in
9858_129
methodological agnosticism by stating that "we simply do not know - and cannot know" if it exists
9858_130
or not. He noted that, even if such a true and absolute nature of reality really existed, it would
9858_131
only be accessible through "esoteric" spiritual practices, and could not be discovered or measured
9858_132
by the "exoteric" tools of scientific and scholarly enquiry. Hanegraaff pointed out that an
9858_133
approach that seeks a common inner hidden core of all esoteric currents masks that such groups
9858_134
often differ greatly, being rooted in their own historical and social contexts and expressing
9858_135
mutually exclusive ideas and agendas. A third issue was that many of those currents widely
9858_136
recognised as esoteric never concealed their teachings, and in the twentieth century came to
9858_137
permeate popular culture, thus problematizing the claim that esotericism could be defined by its
9858_138
hidden and secretive nature. Moreover, Hanegraaff noted that when scholars adopt this definition,
9858_139
it shows that they subscribe to the religious doctrines espoused by the very groups they are
9858_140
studying.
9858_141
Esotericism as an enchanted world view
9858_142
Another approach to Western esotericism treats it as a world view that embraces "enchantment" in
9858_143
contrast to world views influenced by post-Cartesian, post-Newtonian, and positivist science that
9858_144
sought to "dis-enchant" the world. That approach understands esotericism as comprising those world
9858_145
views that eschew a belief in instrumental causality and instead adopt a belief that all parts of
9858_146
the universe are interrelated without a need for causal chains. It stands as a radical alternative
9858_147
to the disenchanted world views that have dominated Western culture since the scientific
9858_148
revolution, and must therefore always be at odds with secular culture.
9858_149
An early exponent of this definition was the historian of Renaissance thought Frances Yates in her
9858_150
discussions of a Hermetic Tradition, which she saw as an "enchanted" alternative to established
9858_151
religion and rationalistic science. However, the primary exponent of this view was Faivre, who
9858_152
published a series of criteria for how to define "Western esotericism" in 1992. Faivre claimed that
9858_153
esotericism was "identifiable by the presence of six fundamental characteristics or components",
9858_154
four of which were "intrinsic" and thus vital to defining something as being esoteric, while the
9858_155
other two were "secondary" and thus not necessarily present in every form of esotericism. He listed
9858_156
these characteristics as follows:
9858_157
"Correspondences": This is the idea that there are both real and symbolic correspondences existing
9858_158
between all things within the universe. As examples for this, Faivre pointed to the esoteric
9858_159
concept of the macrocosm and microcosm, often presented as the dictum of "as above, so below", as
9858_160
well as the astrological idea that the actions of the planets have a direct corresponding influence
9858_161
on the behaviour of human beings.
9858_162
"Living Nature": Faivre argued that all esotericists envision the natural universe as being imbued
9858_163
with its own life force, and that as such they understand it as being "complex, plural,
9858_164
hierarchical".
9858_165
"Imagination and Mediations": Faivre believed that all esotericists place great emphasis on both
9858_166
the human imagination, and mediations—"such as rituals, symbolic images, mandalas, intermediary
9858_167
spirits"—and mantras as tools that provide access to worlds and levels of reality existing between
9858_168
the material world and the divine.
9858_169
"Experience of Transmutation": Faivre's fourth intrinsic characteristic of esotericism was the
9858_170
emphasis that esotericists place on fundamentally transforming themselves through their practice,
9858_171
for instance through the spiritual transformation that is alleged to accompany the attainment of
9858_172
gnosis.