chunk_id
stringlengths
3
9
chunk
stringlengths
1
100
9858_173
"Practice of Concordance": The first of Faivre's secondary characteristics of esotericism was the
9858_174
belief—held by many esotericists, such as those in the Traditionalist School—that there is a
9858_175
fundamental unifying principle or root from which all world religions and spiritual practices
9858_176
emerge. The common esoteric principle is that attaining this unifying principle can bring the
9858_177
world's different belief systems together in unity.
9858_178
"Transmission": Faivre's second secondary characteristic was the emphasis on the transmission of
9858_179
esoteric teachings and secrets from a master to their disciple, through a process of initiation.
9858_180
Faivre's form of categorisation has been endorsed by scholars like Goodrick-Clarke, and by 2007
9858_181
Bogdan could note that Faivre's had become "the standard definition" of Western esotericism in use
9858_182
among scholars. However, in 2013 the scholar Kennet Granholm stated only that Faivre's definition
9858_183
had been "the dominating paradigm for a long while" and that it "still exerts influence among
9858_184
scholars outside the study of Western esotericism". The advantage of Faivre's system is that it
9858_185
facilitates comparing varying esoteric traditions "with one another in a systematic fashion."
9858_186
However, many scholars have criticised Faivre's theory, pointing out various weaknesses. Hanegraaff
9858_187
claimed that Faivre's approach entailed "reasoning by prototype" in that it relied upon already
9858_188
having a "best example" of what Western esotericism should look like, against which other phenomena
9858_189
then had to be compared. The scholar of esotericism Kocku von Stuckrad (born 1966) noted that
9858_190
Faivre's taxonomy was based on his own areas of specialism—Renaissance Hermeticism, Christian
9858_191
Kabbalah, and Protestant Theosophy—and that it was thus not based on a wider understanding of
9858_192
esotericism as it has existed throughout history, from the ancient world to the contemporary
9858_193
period. Accordingly, Von Stuckrad suggested that it was a good typology for understanding
9858_194
"Christian esotericism in the early modern period" but lacked utility beyond that.
9858_195
Esotericism as claims to higher knowledge
9858_196
As an alternative to Faivre's framework, Kocku von Stuckrad developed his own variant, though he
9858_197
argued that this did not represent a "definition" but rather "a framework of analysis" for
9858_198
scholarly usage. He stated that "on the most general level of analysis", esotericism represented
9858_199
"the claim of higher knowledge", a claim to possessing "wisdom that is superior to other
9858_200
interpretations of cosmos and history" that serves as a "master key for answering all questions of
9858_201
humankind." Accordingly, he believed that esoteric groups placed a great emphasis on secrecy, not
9858_202
because they were inherently rooted in elite groups but because the idea of concealed secrets that
9858_203
can be revealed was central to their discourse. Examining the means of accessing higher knowledge,
9858_204
he highlighted two themes that he believed could be found within esotericism, that of mediation
9858_205
through contact with non-human entities, and individual experience. Accordingly, for Von Stuckrad,
9858_206
esotericism could be best understood as "a structural element of Western culture" rather than as a
9858_207
selection of different schools of thought.
9858_208
Western esotericism as "rejected knowledge"
9858_209
Hanegraaff proposed an additional definition that "Western esotericism" is a category that
9858_210
represents "the academy's dustbin of rejected knowledge." In this respect, it contains all of the
9858_211
theories and world views rejected by the mainstream intellectual community because they do not
9858_212
accord with "normative conceptions of religion, rationality and science." His approach is rooted
9858_213
within the field of the history of ideas, and stresses the role of change and transformation over
9858_214
time.
9858_215
Goodrick-Clarke was critical of this approach, believing that it relegated Western esotericism to
9858_216
the position of "a casualty of positivist and materialist perspectives in the nineteenth-century"
9858_217
and thus reinforces the idea that Western esoteric traditions were of little historical importance.
9858_218
Bogdan similarly expressed concern regarding Hanegraaff's definition, believing that it made the
9858_219
category of Western esotericism "all inclusive" and thus analytically useless.
9858_220
History Late Antiquity
9858_221
The origins of Western esotericism are in the Hellenistic Eastern Mediterranean, then part of the
9858_222
Roman Empire, during Late Antiquity. This was a milieu that mixed religious and intellectual
9858_223
traditions from Greece, Egypt, the Levant, Babylon, and Persia—in which globalisation,
9858_224
urbanisation, and multiculturalism were bringing about socio-cultural change.
9858_225
One component of this was Hermetism, an Egyptian Hellenistic school of thought that takes its name
9858_226
from the legendary Egyptian wise man, Hermes Trismegistus. In the 2nd and 3rd centuries, a number
9858_227
of texts attributed to Hermes Trismegistus appeared, including the Corpus Hermeticum, Asclepius,
9858_228
and The Discourse on the Eighth and Ninth. Some still debate whether Hermetism was a purely
9858_229
literary phenomenon or had communities of practitioners who acted on these ideas, but it has been
9858_230
established that these texts discuss the true nature of God, emphasising that humans must transcend
9858_231
rational thought and worldly desires to find salvation and be reborn into a spiritual body of
9858_232
immaterial light, thereby achieving spiritual unity with divinity.
9858_233
Another tradition of esoteric thought in Late Antiquity was Gnosticism. Various Gnostic sects
9858_234
existed, and they broadly believed that the divine light had been imprisoned within the material
9858_235
world by a malevolent entity known as the Demiurge, who was served by demonic helpers, the Archons.
9858_236
It was the Gnostic belief that people, who were imbued with the divine light, should seek to attain
9858_237
gnosis and thus escape from the world of matter and rejoin the divine source.
9858_238
A third form of esotericism in Late Antiquity was Neoplatonism, a school of thought influenced by
9858_239
the ideas of the philosopher Plato. Advocated by such figures as Plotinus, Porphyry, Iamblichus,
9858_240
and Proclus, Neoplatonism held that the human soul had fallen from its divine origins into the
9858_241
material world, but that it could progress, through a number of hierarchical spheres of being, to
9858_242
return to its divine origins once more. The later Neoplatonists performed theurgy, a ritual
9858_243
practice attested in such sources as the Chaldean Oracles. Scholars are still unsure of precisely
9858_244
what theurgy involved, but know it involved a practice designed to make gods appear, who could then
9858_245
raise the theurgist's mind to the reality of the divine.
9858_246
Middle Ages
9858_247
After the fall of Rome, alchemy and philosophy and other aspects of the tradition were largely
9858_248
preserved in the Arab and Near Eastern world and reintroduced into Western Europe by Jews and by
9858_249
the cultural contact between Christians and Muslims in Sicily and southern Italy. The 12th century
9858_250
saw the development of the Kabbalah in southern Italy and medieval Spain.
9858_251
The medieval period also saw the publication of grimoires, which offered often elaborate formulas
9858_252
for theurgy and thaumaturgy. Many of the grimoires seem to have kabbalistic influence. Figures in
9858_253
alchemy from this period seem to also have authored or used grimoires.
9858_254
Renaissance and Early Modern period
9858_255
During the Renaissance, a number of European thinkers began to synthesize "pagan" (that is, not
9858_256
Christian) philosophies, which were then being made available through Arabic translations, with
9858_257
Christian thought and the Jewish kabbalah. The earliest of these individuals was the Byzantine
9858_258
philosopher Plethon (1355/60–1452?), who argued that the Chaldean Oracles represented an example of
9858_259
a superior religion of ancient humanity that had been passed down by the Platonists.
9858_260
Plethon's ideas interested the ruler of Florence, Cosimo de Medici, who employed Florentine thinker
9858_261
Marsilio Ficino (1433–1499) to translate Plato's works into Latin. Ficino went on to translate and
9858_262
publish the works of various Platonic figures, arguing that their philosophies were compatible with
9858_263
Christianity, and allowing for the emergence of a wider movement in Renaissance Platonism, or
9858_264
Platonic Orientalism. Ficino also translated part of the Corpus Hermeticum, though the rest was
9858_265
translated by his contemporary, Lodovico Lazzarelli (1447–1500).
9858_266
Another core figure in this intellectual milieu was Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (1463–1494), who
9858_267
achieved notability in 1486 by inviting scholars from across Europe to come and debate with him 900
9858_268
theses that he had written. Pico della Mirandola argued that all of these philosophies reflected a
9858_269
grand universal wisdom. However, Pope Innocent VIII condemned these ideas, criticising him for
9858_270
attempting to mix pagan and Jewish ideas with Christianity.
9858_271
Pico della Mirandola's increased interest in Jewish kabbalah led to his development of a distinct
9858_272
form of Christian Kabbalah. His work was built on by the German Johannes Reuchlin (1455–1522) who