id
stringlengths 33
45
| content
stringlengths 95
98.7k
| url
stringlengths 18
263
|
|---|---|---|
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1356464049#8_2847740068 | Title: Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant?
Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant?
6 Answers
Content: Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant? I am...
...Show more
Source (s): suddenly lactose intolerant: https://trimurl.im/a14/can-you-suddenly-become-lac...
Anonymous
1 decade ago
Thetakeover83,
Lactose is a larger sugar that is made up of two smaller sugars, glucose and galactose. In order for lactose to be absorbed from the intestine and into the body, it must first be split into glucose and galactose. The glucose and galactose then are absorbed by the cells lining the small intestine. The enzyme that splits lactose into glucose and galactose is called lactase, and it is located on the surface of the cells that line the small intestine. Lactose intolerance is caused by reduced or absent activity of lactase that prevents the splitting of lactose (lactase deficiency). Lactase deficiency may occur for one of three reasons, congenital, secondary or developmental. It is important to emphasize that lactase deficiency is not the same as lactose intolerance. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081101052747AAkGeL6 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1356464049#9_2847741419 | Title: Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant?
Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant?
6 Answers
Content: The glucose and galactose then are absorbed by the cells lining the small intestine. The enzyme that splits lactose into glucose and galactose is called lactase, and it is located on the surface of the cells that line the small intestine. Lactose intolerance is caused by reduced or absent activity of lactase that prevents the splitting of lactose (lactase deficiency). Lactase deficiency may occur for one of three reasons, congenital, secondary or developmental. It is important to emphasize that lactase deficiency is not the same as lactose intolerance. Persons with milder deficiencies of lactase often have no symptoms after the ingestion of milk. For unclear reasons, even persons with moderate deficiencies of lactase may not have symptoms. A diagnosis of lactase deficiency is made when the amount of lactase in the intestine is reduced, but a diagnosis of lactose intolerance is made only when the reduced amount of lactase causes symptoms. It would appear that you have taken the correct steps because the most obvious means of treating lactose intolerance is by reducing the amount of lactose in the diet. Which is what you have done. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081101052747AAkGeL6 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1356464049#10_2847742942 | Title: Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant?
Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant?
6 Answers
Content: Persons with milder deficiencies of lactase often have no symptoms after the ingestion of milk. For unclear reasons, even persons with moderate deficiencies of lactase may not have symptoms. A diagnosis of lactase deficiency is made when the amount of lactase in the intestine is reduced, but a diagnosis of lactose intolerance is made only when the reduced amount of lactase causes symptoms. It would appear that you have taken the correct steps because the most obvious means of treating lactose intolerance is by reducing the amount of lactose in the diet. Which is what you have done. Fortunately, most people who are lactose intolerant can tolerate small or even moderate amounts of lactose. It often takes only elimination of the major milk-containing products to obtain sufficient relief from their symptoms. Thus, it may be necessary to eliminate only milk, yogurt, cottage cheese, and ice cream. You would be advised to seek advise from your doctor. ALL ANSWERS SHOULD BE THOROUGHLY RESEARCHED, IN ANY FORUM AND ESPECIALLY IN THIS ONE. - | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081101052747AAkGeL6 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1356464049#11_2847744365 | Title: Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant?
Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant?
6 Answers
Content: Fortunately, most people who are lactose intolerant can tolerate small or even moderate amounts of lactose. It often takes only elimination of the major milk-containing products to obtain sufficient relief from their symptoms. Thus, it may be necessary to eliminate only milk, yogurt, cottage cheese, and ice cream. You would be advised to seek advise from your doctor. ALL ANSWERS SHOULD BE THOROUGHLY RESEARCHED, IN ANY FORUM AND ESPECIALLY IN THIS ONE. - MANY ANSWERS ARE FLAWED. The information provided here should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed physician should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. I add a link with details of this subject
http://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Lactose_intolerance
Hope this helps
matador 89
...Show more
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081101052747AAkGeL6 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1356464049#12_2847745676 | Title: Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant?
Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant?
6 Answers
Content: MANY ANSWERS ARE FLAWED. The information provided here should not be used during any medical emergency or for the diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition. A licensed physician should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions. I add a link with details of this subject
http://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Lactose_intolerance
Hope this helps
matador 89
...Show more
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer. Dyoza
1 decade ago
yes. i had it when i was 19! Anonymous
1 decade ago
as you age, i know you do. maybe it's just the veggies you are eating. sometimes veggies do weird things. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081101052747AAkGeL6 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1356464049#13_2847746710 | Title: Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant?
Can you suddenly become lactose intolerant?
6 Answers
Content: Dyoza
1 decade ago
yes. i had it when i was 19! Anonymous
1 decade ago
as you age, i know you do. maybe it's just the veggies you are eating. sometimes veggies do weird things. give it a month or 2
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now. Ask Question | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081101052747AAkGeL6 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1357886379#0_2851141616 | Title: What are disease-causing organisms known as? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What are disease-causing organisms known as?
What are disease-causing organisms known as?
10 Answers
Anonymous
Content: What are disease-causing organisms known as? | Yahoo Answers
Jocelyn
Jocelyn
asked in Science & Mathematics Biology · 1 decade ago
What are disease-causing organisms known as? A- pathogens
B- bacilli
C- cocci
D- archaebacteria
...Show more
10 Answers
Relevance
sweetgal2301
Lv 5
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
Answer is A - Pathogens. They can be bacteria, fungus etc etc. Your other three answers could be examples for pathogens, though without the species name you cannot identify any of those micro organisms as a disease causing organism. Since there are cocci and bacillus bacteria that are good freindly bacteria in our gut and are essential for our digestive system ... without a specific species name you cannot identify whether they are friendly or unfriendly bacteria. ...Show more
Source (s): PhD candidate in Stem Cell biology and Immunology
Erika
Lv 4
4 years ago
Disease Causing Organisms
Source (s): https://shrink.im/bacKd
Kathleen
Lv 4
5 years ago
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/ax4SG
A living disease causing organism is known as pathogen. atcblue05
Lv 6
1 decade ago
Definitely pathogens, A.
Pathogens can consist of bacteria, parasites, fungi, etc. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081115104430AAsY0wb |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1357886379#3_2851146517 | Title: What are disease-causing organisms known as? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What are disease-causing organisms known as?
What are disease-causing organisms known as?
10 Answers
Anonymous
Content: Without ever popping a single pill, getting any dreaded needle, prescriptions of any kind. Even sidestepping alternative therapies that never seem to work. Ineffective supplements that waste time and frustrate you to no end. Not to mention tear a hole in your wallet...
...Or even put you in an early grave. Think of how you felt today - http://reversediseasetoday.info/young-again-188.ht...
...Show more
Anonymous
5 years ago
Forget anything you have ever been told about Diabetes. And get this - it has nothing to do with insulin, exercise, diet or anything else you've heard in the past. It's all based on latest breakthrough research that Big Pharma is going Stir Crazy to hide from you. Visit here : https://tinyurl.im/aH1si to find out what all the fuss is about. ...Show more
FiguringOutLife
1 decade ago
Archaebacteria, it can cause Lyme disease
Bacilli can cause meningitis's
Cocci can cause scarlet fever. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081115104430AAsY0wb |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1357886379#4_2851147833 | Title: What are disease-causing organisms known as? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What are disease-causing organisms known as?
What are disease-causing organisms known as?
10 Answers
Anonymous
Content: And get this - it has nothing to do with insulin, exercise, diet or anything else you've heard in the past. It's all based on latest breakthrough research that Big Pharma is going Stir Crazy to hide from you. Visit here : https://tinyurl.im/aH1si to find out what all the fuss is about. ...Show more
FiguringOutLife
1 decade ago
Archaebacteria, it can cause Lyme disease
Bacilli can cause meningitis's
Cocci can cause scarlet fever. But a disease causing organism is A, pathogen. B, C, D are all pathogens.....
So the answer is A
...Show more
Source (s): Minor in Bio. Thomas E
Lv 7
1 decade ago
A.
People who are social diseases are called sociopaths. Human cancers. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081115104430AAsY0wb |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1360972392#1_2858536003 | Title: Is it normal for antibiotics to make me feel sick? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Is it normal for antibiotics to make me feel sick?
Is it normal for antibiotics to make me feel sick?
11 Answers
Content: I feel queasy and feel like I have to vomit. I've been going to the bathroom constantly and have a constant headache. I feel like these antibiotics are hurting me as opposed to helping me. Has anyone ever experienced this while being on antibiotics? ( Serious responses only)
...Show more
11 Answers
Relevance
yoohoo
Lv 6
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
YES! They're well known to cause stomach upset, nausea, etc. Just ask for another type or if not, take them with some food to buffer your tummy. Anonymous
5 years ago
For the best answers, search on this site https://smarturl.im/aDH4x
Anana's right, but I'll add something more. You might find them easier to take if you eat some food at the same time. Also, let your pharmacist know about the aching muscles. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081217064508AAxc4hR |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1360972392#2_2858537171 | Title: Is it normal for antibiotics to make me feel sick? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Is it normal for antibiotics to make me feel sick?
Is it normal for antibiotics to make me feel sick?
11 Answers
Content: They're well known to cause stomach upset, nausea, etc. Just ask for another type or if not, take them with some food to buffer your tummy. Anonymous
5 years ago
For the best answers, search on this site https://smarturl.im/aDH4x
Anana's right, but I'll add something more. You might find them easier to take if you eat some food at the same time. Also, let your pharmacist know about the aching muscles. That's not a typical side effect. After the run of the antibiotics, you will want to take some probiotics to restore the good bacteria. Your pharmacist or someone at a health food store can help you with that. Yogurt is good for that as well. Good luck and feel better. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081217064508AAxc4hR |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1362948068#1_2863390297 | Title: how did Hawaii become a US territory? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: how did Hawaii become a US territory?
Trending News
how did Hawaii become a US territory?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/LZY4v
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Anonymous
Content: In 1894, the Republic of Hawaii was established. On August 12, 1898, the government of the Republic transferred sovereignty to the United States. Hawaii became a territory of the United States in 1900. Toward the end of the 19th cent., agitation for constitutional reform in Hawaii led to the overthrow (1893) of Queen Liliuokalani, who had ruled since 1891. A provisional government was established and John L. Stevens, the U.S. minister to Hawaii, proclaimed the country a U.S. protectorate. President Grover Cleveland, however, refused to annex Hawaii since most Hawaiians did not support a revolution; the Hawaiians and Americans in the sugar industry had encouraged the overthrow of the monarchy to serve their business needs. The United States tried to bring about the restoration of Queen Liliuokalani, but the provisional government on the islands refused to give up power and instead established (1894) a republic with Sanford B. Dole as president. Cleveland's successor, President William McKinley, favored annexation, which was finally accomplished in 1898. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090106201119AAgJ0i9 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1362948068#2_2863391913 | Title: how did Hawaii become a US territory? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: how did Hawaii become a US territory?
Trending News
how did Hawaii become a US territory?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/LZY4v
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Anonymous
Content: A provisional government was established and John L. Stevens, the U.S. minister to Hawaii, proclaimed the country a U.S. protectorate. President Grover Cleveland, however, refused to annex Hawaii since most Hawaiians did not support a revolution; the Hawaiians and Americans in the sugar industry had encouraged the overthrow of the monarchy to serve their business needs. The United States tried to bring about the restoration of Queen Liliuokalani, but the provisional government on the islands refused to give up power and instead established (1894) a republic with Sanford B. Dole as president. Cleveland's successor, President William McKinley, favored annexation, which was finally accomplished in 1898. Hawaii was a native kingdom throughout most of the 19th century, when the expansion of the vital sugar industry (pineapple came after 1898) meant increasing U.S. business and political involvement. In 1893, Queen Liliuokalani was deposed and a year later the Republic of Hawaii was established with Sanford B. Dole as president. Then, following its annexation in 1898, Hawaii became a U.S. territory in 1900. In 1900 the islands were made a territory, with Dole as governor. In this period, Hawaii's pineapple industry expanded as pineapples were first grown for canning purposes. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090106201119AAgJ0i9 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1364177635#0_2866316976 | Title: what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties?
what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties?
3 Answers
Democratic-republicans Vs Federalists
Content: what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties? | Yahoo Answers
shadae (B.M)
shadae (B.M)
asked in Politics & Government Government · 1 decade ago
what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties? 3 Answers
Relevance
Answers4You
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
Federalists believed in a strong central government and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. Generally they were Pro-British. The Federalists were pro-manufacturing and banking. They wanted to reimburse Revolutionary War debts, increase tariffs to promote manufacturing and institute an internal excise tax. Democrat-Republicans believed in States rights with a weaker central government and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Generally they were Pro-French. They believed the Federalists were elitist. Democrat-Republicans were pro-agriculture. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090120163733AAca2jU |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1364177635#1_2866318391 | Title: what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties?
what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties?
3 Answers
Democratic-republicans Vs Federalists
Content: They wanted to reimburse Revolutionary War debts, increase tariffs to promote manufacturing and institute an internal excise tax. Democrat-Republicans believed in States rights with a weaker central government and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Generally they were Pro-French. They believed the Federalists were elitist. Democrat-Republicans were pro-agriculture. They thought only white males who owned property should vote, and that all men should own property. If the US had an agriculturally based economy they would be able to feed themselves, sell the surplus, and purchase manufactured goods from Europe. It was believed that people would put aside their own personal gain for the public good. When the Democrat-Republicans gained National office they repealed excise taxes, retired the national debt and reduced the size of the armed forces. The party only lasted from 1792 to about 1828. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090120163733AAca2jU |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1364177635#2_2866319823 | Title: what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties?
what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties?
3 Answers
Democratic-republicans Vs Federalists
Content: They thought only white males who owned property should vote, and that all men should own property. If the US had an agriculturally based economy they would be able to feed themselves, sell the surplus, and purchase manufactured goods from Europe. It was believed that people would put aside their own personal gain for the public good. When the Democrat-Republicans gained National office they repealed excise taxes, retired the national debt and reduced the size of the armed forces. The party only lasted from 1792 to about 1828. ...Show more
sarratt
Lv 4
4 years ago
Democratic-republicans Vs Federalists
Source (s): https://shrink.im/baE4U
taniarocks21
Lv 4
1 decade ago
The federalists were led by Hamilton. They were more in the north and they were for manufacturing. They supported the national bank and they were well-educated and of the elite. They were loose constructionists. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090120163733AAca2jU |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1364177635#3_2866321241 | Title: what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties?
what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties?
3 Answers
Democratic-republicans Vs Federalists
Content: ...Show more
sarratt
Lv 4
4 years ago
Democratic-republicans Vs Federalists
Source (s): https://shrink.im/baE4U
taniarocks21
Lv 4
1 decade ago
The federalists were led by Hamilton. They were more in the north and they were for manufacturing. They supported the national bank and they were well-educated and of the elite. They were loose constructionists. The Democratic-Republicans were led by Jefferson. They were more of the people from the south who worked on plantations. They were more of the common people and they were strict constructionists. They feared an absolute ruler and they thought that the creation of the national bank was unconstitutional because it wasn’t “necessary or proper”. ...Show more
Still have questions? | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090120163733AAca2jU |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1364177635#4_2866322522 | Title: what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties?
what were the differences between federalist and democratic republican parties?
3 Answers
Democratic-republicans Vs Federalists
Content: The Democratic-Republicans were led by Jefferson. They were more of the people from the south who worked on plantations. They were more of the common people and they were strict constructionists. They feared an absolute ruler and they thought that the creation of the national bank was unconstitutional because it wasn’t “necessary or proper”. ...Show more
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now. Ask Question | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090120163733AAca2jU |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1365205674#11_2868845941 | Title: What are the three stages in the money laundering process? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What are the three stages in the money laundering process?
Anonymous
What are the three stages in the money laundering process?
8 Answers
Anonymous
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Content: 5 years ago
#1 ; integration
#2: bachelor's degree
#3: assets
#4: allows organized crime leaders to be prosecuted for acts that they ordered
#5; There is a pyramid of investors in which lower rungs pay for investment returns on upper ones, while the criminal siphons money. ...Show more
bigdaddy
1 decade ago
1. Commit illegal act for money. 2.Filter the money through a legitimate business. 3.Go to Jail for being an idiot
Still have questions? | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090130115418AAIhgNX |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1365205674#12_2868846912 | Title: What are the three stages in the money laundering process? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What are the three stages in the money laundering process?
Anonymous
What are the three stages in the money laundering process?
8 Answers
Anonymous
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Content: There is a pyramid of investors in which lower rungs pay for investment returns on upper ones, while the criminal siphons money. ...Show more
bigdaddy
1 decade ago
1. Commit illegal act for money. 2.Filter the money through a legitimate business. 3.Go to Jail for being an idiot
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now. Ask Question | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090130115418AAIhgNX |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1365224701#8_2868890958 | Title: Do Psychiatrists always prescribe medications? ? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Do Psychiatrists always prescribe medications? ?
Do Psychiatrists always prescribe medications? ?
8 Answers
Content: The only way I can control my anxiety is with my mind. I read some books and learned to control my stress, anxiety levels (etc). Medication does not help you.. it only makes you feel good when it kicks in... but what happens when it wears out or you stop taking it for a few days? My doctor told me that it would get worse. The only advice I have is to buy some books that gives you tips on how to deal with stress and anxiety. It worked for me - hopefully it'll work for you too. Good luck
...Show more
Greg P
Lv 5
1 decade ago
Psychiatrists are medical doctors who believe that mental diseases are medical conditions that have a medical explanation and a medical cure. So they will most often prescribe medications because medications are the medical response to a disease. If your interested in other forms of therapy, you can ask about seeing a psychologist, or a therapist. They specialize in treating mental diseases without the use of medicine. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090130141227AASZVGa |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1365224701#9_2868892305 | Title: Do Psychiatrists always prescribe medications? ? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Do Psychiatrists always prescribe medications? ?
Do Psychiatrists always prescribe medications? ?
8 Answers
Content: It worked for me - hopefully it'll work for you too. Good luck
...Show more
Greg P
Lv 5
1 decade ago
Psychiatrists are medical doctors who believe that mental diseases are medical conditions that have a medical explanation and a medical cure. So they will most often prescribe medications because medications are the medical response to a disease. If your interested in other forms of therapy, you can ask about seeing a psychologist, or a therapist. They specialize in treating mental diseases without the use of medicine. Though if you are bad enough, they will also recommend you see a psychiatrist. There are some psychiatrists who will practice both; there aren't as easy to find as regular psychiatrists though. ...Show more
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090130141227AASZVGa |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1366025528#0_2870835741 | Title: was the first crusade successful? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: was the first crusade successful?
Anonymous
was the first crusade successful?
7 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: was the first crusade successful? | Yahoo Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
asked in Arts & Humanities History · 1 decade ago
was the first crusade successful? is the first crusade successful? why or why not? 7 Answers
Relevance
Captain Atom
Lv 6
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
The First Crusade was proclaimed by Pope Clement II in 1095, with the stated purpose of driving the Seljuk Turks out of Anatolia, where they were threatening the Eastern Roman Empire, centered in Constantinople. In this the Crusaders were largely unsuccessful, as theTurks were much better organized and led. Very soon, Crusaders changed their goals from preserving the Empire to conquering Jerusalem from Muslim control. They were partially successful in this, setting up several Crusader States - European-controlled enclaves in modern day Israel, Lebanon and Syria. Some remained in European control for nearly 200 years, but they were eventually reabsorbed by Turks and Arabs. During the First Crusade a sideline of the action was the wholesale persecution of Jews in occupied areas. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090207143507AAJu7Yk |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1366025528#1_2870837200 | Title: was the first crusade successful? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: was the first crusade successful?
Anonymous
was the first crusade successful?
7 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: In this the Crusaders were largely unsuccessful, as theTurks were much better organized and led. Very soon, Crusaders changed their goals from preserving the Empire to conquering Jerusalem from Muslim control. They were partially successful in this, setting up several Crusader States - European-controlled enclaves in modern day Israel, Lebanon and Syria. Some remained in European control for nearly 200 years, but they were eventually reabsorbed by Turks and Arabs. During the First Crusade a sideline of the action was the wholesale persecution of Jews in occupied areas. Some were forced to convert to Christianity, some were killed, and many were robbed of whatever possessions they had. Many consider this the first large antisemitic pogrom of the Christian era. ...Show more
Anonymous
5 years ago
define success. The first crusade was the only one to actually take and hold the holy land. It was the only successful one in the stated goal. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090207143507AAJu7Yk |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1366025528#2_2870838539 | Title: was the first crusade successful? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: was the first crusade successful?
Anonymous
was the first crusade successful?
7 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: Some were forced to convert to Christianity, some were killed, and many were robbed of whatever possessions they had. Many consider this the first large antisemitic pogrom of the Christian era. ...Show more
Anonymous
5 years ago
define success. The first crusade was the only one to actually take and hold the holy land. It was the only successful one in the stated goal. However all the officially sanctioned crusades were successful in that they took large numbers of fighting men out of europe and put them into asia which served the purpose of lessening the general slaughter and fighting that went on in europe at the time. Islam won in the sense that the crusaders forced the muslims to stop killing each other and unite to drive out the crusaders. However historically speaking it led to the eventual downfall of the muslim powers since their major victories convinced them that horse archers were the be all end all of warfare which led to a sort of technological laziness that left them decades behind the rest of europe where firearms and artillery was concerned. This occurred because they didn't realize the victory was less a result of their horse archers and more a result of the desert sun on people wearing heavy metal armor. A common mistake to fight the last war. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090207143507AAJu7Yk |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1366025528#3_2870840213 | Title: was the first crusade successful? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: was the first crusade successful?
Anonymous
was the first crusade successful?
7 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: However all the officially sanctioned crusades were successful in that they took large numbers of fighting men out of europe and put them into asia which served the purpose of lessening the general slaughter and fighting that went on in europe at the time. Islam won in the sense that the crusaders forced the muslims to stop killing each other and unite to drive out the crusaders. However historically speaking it led to the eventual downfall of the muslim powers since their major victories convinced them that horse archers were the be all end all of warfare which led to a sort of technological laziness that left them decades behind the rest of europe where firearms and artillery was concerned. This occurred because they didn't realize the victory was less a result of their horse archers and more a result of the desert sun on people wearing heavy metal armor. A common mistake to fight the last war. The crusades became less and less successful due to a combination increasing muslim effectiveness in dealing with crusader tactics and a decreased sense of threat felt by europeans since they were less and less concerned about muslim encroachment into europe. As far as historical speculation is concerned one wonders what would have happened had Baldwin the IV not been a leper. ...Show more
Jen
1 decade ago
The first crusades were fairly successful because the French and English involved (Christians) were so passionate and optomistic about their battles. However after less troops were being sent over, victorys began to dwindle. After the "Children's Crusade" (in which a few hundred Italian and French children went to conquer Jerusalem, I mean like four year olds, who never really made it to Israel, as they were sold into slavery by arab traders) the Pope felt embarressed and less crusades took place. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090207143507AAJu7Yk |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1366025528#4_2870842430 | Title: was the first crusade successful? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: was the first crusade successful?
Anonymous
was the first crusade successful?
7 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: The crusades became less and less successful due to a combination increasing muslim effectiveness in dealing with crusader tactics and a decreased sense of threat felt by europeans since they were less and less concerned about muslim encroachment into europe. As far as historical speculation is concerned one wonders what would have happened had Baldwin the IV not been a leper. ...Show more
Jen
1 decade ago
The first crusades were fairly successful because the French and English involved (Christians) were so passionate and optomistic about their battles. However after less troops were being sent over, victorys began to dwindle. After the "Children's Crusade" (in which a few hundred Italian and French children went to conquer Jerusalem, I mean like four year olds, who never really made it to Israel, as they were sold into slavery by arab traders) the Pope felt embarressed and less crusades took place. Eventually war among the Europeans made the Crusades disappear. Hope that helps! Good luck! God bless! <3 =)
...Show more
Lothaire
6 years ago
This Site Might Help You. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090207143507AAJu7Yk |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1366025528#8_2870846347 | Title: was the first crusade successful? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: was the first crusade successful?
Anonymous
was the first crusade successful?
7 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: they got to get new feudal realms to be overlords of and not get excommunication from the pope. From the Byzantine empire and orthodox Christians point of view: Absolutely not. Instead of gaining relief and assistance from the Catholic west and a weakening of power from their Islamic nieghbours they found with the Crusaders another even more dangerous rival in the region. ...Show more
Anonymous
1 decade ago
Yes - off they all went - had no idea exactly where they were going - got to Jerusalem and broke into the place in 1099. Of course the Crusaders were so stupid that they just killed everybody whether the people there were Christian, Jews or Muslim. The murder of the people in Jerusalem freaked out the Muslims SO MUCH! They'd never seen that level of violence and stupidity - so that's how the Muslims remember the Christians Europeans. And that's how they think of the American invaders in Iraq and Afghanistan to this day. ...Show more
Dave aka Spider Monkey
Lv 7
1 decade ago
If you were Christian it was successful because they got back the Holy Land , however it can be deemed a failure because of the illtreatment done to the Muslims and Jews who would not convert to Christianity. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090207143507AAJu7Yk |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1366025528#9_2870847943 | Title: was the first crusade successful? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: was the first crusade successful?
Anonymous
was the first crusade successful?
7 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: Of course the Crusaders were so stupid that they just killed everybody whether the people there were Christian, Jews or Muslim. The murder of the people in Jerusalem freaked out the Muslims SO MUCH! They'd never seen that level of violence and stupidity - so that's how the Muslims remember the Christians Europeans. And that's how they think of the American invaders in Iraq and Afghanistan to this day. ...Show more
Dave aka Spider Monkey
Lv 7
1 decade ago
If you were Christian it was successful because they got back the Holy Land , however it can be deemed a failure because of the illtreatment done to the Muslims and Jews who would not convert to Christianity. Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now. Ask Question | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090207143507AAJu7Yk |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1366945591#6_2873102840 | Title: Greek Contributions to the Modern World? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Greek Contributions to the Modern World?
Greek Contributions to the Modern World?
11 Answers
Anonymous
Content: Greeks affected sports in western civilization. Myron's famous sculpture, the Discus Thrower is an example of a kind of sport in ancient Greek times that resembled modern day javelin mixed with Frisbee. Greece was the first civilization to incorporate sports and make it a tradition. Greece was the hosts of the first Olympics, the sports that this involved were Running, Chariot racing, wrestling, boxing, javelin, and many more sports. In modern day western civilization athletes compete in many of the same sports as the first Olympics had. The Olympics have now been around for many centuries. The fine arts of Greece affect western civilization. The discus thrower and most other Greek sculptures are emotionless, and usually capture the serenity of motion, and were always proportional, this form of art was known as classical art. Many sculptures and paintings of presidents, and high ranking military leaders are emotionless. The Greeks believed that the emotionless art showed a sense of power. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090217100959AAto1hs |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1367138788#7_2873569779 | Title: Can you help with Economics? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Can you help with Economics?
Trending News
Anonymous
Can you help with Economics?
1 Answer
Content: 21) Olive oil producers want to sell more olive oil at a higher price. Which of the following events would have this effect? a) An increase in the price of olive oil presses. b) A decrease in the cost of transporting olive oil to markets. c) Research finds that consumption of olive oil reduces the risk of heart disease. d) An increase in the price of land used to plant olives. 22) You have an absolute advantage whenever you
a) are better educated than someone else. b) can produce something at a lower opportunity cost than others. c) prefer to do one particular activity. d) can produce more of something than others with the same resources
...Show more
1 Answer
Relevance
leolohwj
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
15. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090219144500AAp1hBr |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1369037158#1_2878104655 | Title: In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists?
In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists?
6 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Anonymous
Content: • Federalists
– Advocated a strong national government. • Demo-Republicans
– Advocated states’ rights. • Federalists
– Supported British in foreign affairs. Demo-Republicans
– Supported the French in foreign affairs. • Federalists
– Favored government by “rich, well-born, and able”. • Demo-Republicans
– Favored government by the “common man”. • Federalists
– Interpretation of the constitution favored loose “implied powers”. • Demo-Republicans
– Interpretation of the constitution favored strict construction. • Federalists
– Favored a national bank. • Demo-Republicans
– Opposed a national bank. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090312203705AAZTfM7 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1369037158#2_2878105997 | Title: In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists?
In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists?
6 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Anonymous
Content: • Demo-Republicans
– Favored government by the “common man”. • Federalists
– Interpretation of the constitution favored loose “implied powers”. • Demo-Republicans
– Interpretation of the constitution favored strict construction. • Federalists
– Favored a national bank. • Demo-Republicans
– Opposed a national bank. • Federalists
– Favored a strong standing army. • Demo-Republicans
– Opposed a standing army. • Federalists
– Supported by New England and city dwellers. • Demo-Republicans
– Supported by Southerners and Westerners. ...Show more
Source (s): | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090312203705AAZTfM7 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1369037158#4_2878108475 | Title: In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists?
In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists?
6 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Anonymous
Content: http://iws.ccccd.edu/gverett/Hist%201301%20Spring%...
mrozek
Lv 4
5 years ago
Federalist Vs Democratic Republican
Source (s): https://shrink.im/a9a5Y
Kevan
6 years ago
This Site Might Help You. RE: In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists? Source (s): early america differences democratic republicans federalists: https://biturl.im/hYgb3
Bonnie
Lv 4
5 years ago
Federalists were for a strong central government, and they are today's Conservatives. Democratic-Republicans believed in more States rights, and they are Progressive in nature. The loose and strict constructionist aspect of the political parties you have nailed which is one of the most difficult aspects of the whole picture you are covering - whether at the high school or collegiate level. ...Show more
How do you think about the answers? | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090312203705AAZTfM7 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1369037158#5_2878109945 | Title: In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists?
In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists?
6 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Anonymous
Content: early america differences democratic republicans federalists: https://biturl.im/hYgb3
Bonnie
Lv 4
5 years ago
Federalists were for a strong central government, and they are today's Conservatives. Democratic-Republicans believed in more States rights, and they are Progressive in nature. The loose and strict constructionist aspect of the political parties you have nailed which is one of the most difficult aspects of the whole picture you are covering - whether at the high school or collegiate level. ...Show more
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer. Miss Kitty
Lv 5
1 decade ago
The Federalist Party was the first to appear. It formed around Alexander Hamilton, who served as secretary of the treasury in the new government organized by George Washington. The Federalists were, by and large, the party of 'the rich and the well-born.' Most of them had supported the Constitution. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090312203705AAZTfM7 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1369037158#6_2878111474 | Title: In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists?
In Early America, what were the differences between Democratic-Republicans and Federalists?
6 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Anonymous
Content: You can sign in to vote the answer. Miss Kitty
Lv 5
1 decade ago
The Federalist Party was the first to appear. It formed around Alexander Hamilton, who served as secretary of the treasury in the new government organized by George Washington. The Federalists were, by and large, the party of 'the rich and the well-born.' Most of them had supported the Constitution. Led by Hamilton, the Federalists worked to create a stronger national government. They favored vigorous executive leadership and a set of policies designed to correct the nation's economic ills. The Federalists' program appealed to financial, manufacturing, and commercial interests. That's all I know. ...Show more
Source (s): | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090312203705AAZTfM7 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1369520139#2_2879298526 | Title: I am doing my income tax return what is the difference between property tax and real estate tax or is it same? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: I am doing my income tax return what is the difference between property tax and real estate tax or is it same?
I am doing my income tax return what is the difference between property tax and real estate tax or is it same?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Content: Real estate taxes is the tax paid for owning land, personal property taxes are any other taxes imposed by your local government on items other than land. For purposes of itemizing deducitons on your federal income taxes, a local tax is considerd a "personal property tax" if its a tax you pay for owning an item, and the amount is based on the value of the item. This means you can't include things like your car registration fees that are imposed at a flat rate per vehicle as a tax on using the roads, but you can include any portion of car registration fees that are based on the value of the vehicle. Clear as Mud? ...Show more
Bostonian In MO
Lv 7
1 decade ago
All real estate taxes are property taxes, but not all property taxes are real estate taxes. Some states tax personal property in addition to real property. MO is a good example with personal property taxes on vehicles, farm & construction equipment, livestock, crops, etc. Whether a property is your home or a rental, the taxes are all real estate (or real property) taxes. ...Show more
Anonymous
1 decade ago
Real Estate taxes are taxes paid on your primary or other homes. Property taxes are taxes on your property such as vehicles, boats, airplanes, etc. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090318083352AA3nUuK |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1371477054#0_2884043481 | Title: What does external factors mean? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What does external factors mean?
What does external factors mean?
4 Answers
Hopefully that is somewhere in the ball park.
External Factors Definition
Anonymous
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/aw7VU
Anonymous
Content: What does external factors mean? | Yahoo Answers
gallardo92
gallardo92
asked in Business & Finance Other - Business & Finance · 1 decade ago
What does external factors mean? What does external factors mean and what are the main external factors affecting businesses? Thanks - 10 points
4 Answers
Relevance
happy2cu420
Lv 5
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
External (outside) factors are situations outside the business that can affect it's performance and productivity. An internal (inside) factor is something like how your staff performs where an outside factor is economic situations (i.e. dincrease in unemployement would imply that people are not spending as much money therefore your business could be suffering due to that) A very broad answer but thats the jist of it. Hopefully that is somewhere in the ball park. ...Show more
jacquin
Lv 4
4 years ago
External Factors Definition
Source (s): https://shrink.im/a0025
Anonymous
5 years ago
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/aw7VU
Children of certain ages have no say as to what it is the parents or main care givers feel is suitable for a child to be exposed to, so that is an 'external factor' in the childs development. For example: Some parents do not let their children read newspapers or watch the news as they feel it is a negative influence (controlling an external factor on behalf of the child)
...Show more
Anonymous
6 years ago
This Site Might Help You. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090408140541AANRDoJ |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1374507656#0_2891369980 | Title: How does figurative language affect the meaning of a work? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: How does figurative language affect the meaning of a work?
How does figurative language affect the meaning of a work?
4 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: How does figurative language affect the meaning of a work? | Yahoo Answers
hello
hello
asked in Education & Reference Homework Help · 1 decade ago
How does figurative language affect the meaning of a work? I am just wondering how figurative language like alliteration, metaphors, hyperbole, etc. help with the meaning of a writing because i have a hard time writing about this in rhetorical analysis essays. 4 Answers
Relevance
Elbie
Lv 6
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
Figurative language uses figures of speech to convey unique images and create some sort of special effect or impression. Figurative language has the effect of enriching a reader's literary experience. Poets often create images or enhance meaning by comparing one thing to another for special effect. A most important figure of speech is the Metaphor. In a metaphor, a poet writes that X is Y. Readers understand that we are not to take the comparison literally, but that the metaphor helps us to see X in a new way. While similes are used in poetry principally for artistic effect, in formal writing they serve not only to increase interest but also to clarify an idea in an imaginative way, an analogy usually identifies several points of similarity and is created for the purpose of conceptual clarity. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090512162814AAGta5k |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1374507656#1_2891371707 | Title: How does figurative language affect the meaning of a work? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: How does figurative language affect the meaning of a work?
How does figurative language affect the meaning of a work?
4 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: Figurative language has the effect of enriching a reader's literary experience. Poets often create images or enhance meaning by comparing one thing to another for special effect. A most important figure of speech is the Metaphor. In a metaphor, a poet writes that X is Y. Readers understand that we are not to take the comparison literally, but that the metaphor helps us to see X in a new way. While similes are used in poetry principally for artistic effect, in formal writing they serve not only to increase interest but also to clarify an idea in an imaginative way, an analogy usually identifies several points of similarity and is created for the purpose of conceptual clarity. Overall, Figurative Language is used for descriptive effect, often to imply ideas indirectly. Figurative expressions are not literally true but express some truth beyond the literal level. ...Show more
Anonymous
5 years ago
Figurative language (aka "literary devices") is writing which says something in a way that is poetic or beautiful. Using figurative language is a way to invite the reader in to experience what the writer is describing. Examples include imagery (words that describe something so well that the reader can almost see, hear, taste, smell, or touch what is being described). | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090512162814AAGta5k |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1374507656#2_2891373431 | Title: How does figurative language affect the meaning of a work? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: How does figurative language affect the meaning of a work?
How does figurative language affect the meaning of a work?
4 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: Overall, Figurative Language is used for descriptive effect, often to imply ideas indirectly. Figurative expressions are not literally true but express some truth beyond the literal level. ...Show more
Anonymous
5 years ago
Figurative language (aka "literary devices") is writing which says something in a way that is poetic or beautiful. Using figurative language is a way to invite the reader in to experience what the writer is describing. Examples include imagery (words that describe something so well that the reader can almost see, hear, taste, smell, or touch what is being described). Simile Metaphor Personification Onomatopoeia Hyperbole etc. ...Show more
northernchic18
1 decade ago
They don't really help. They make writing more interesting or emphasize on certain things. Like an alliteration : The Snake Slithered to the Slippery Stairway
It makes it interesting. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090512162814AAGta5k |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1376845543#7_2897046741 | Title: how did the treaty of versailles affect the people and nations of germany? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: how did the treaty of versailles affect the people and nations of germany?
how did the treaty of versailles affect the people and nations of germany?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Anonymous
Content: soon the paper the money was printed on was worth more than the money its self. The economy fell into ruin and thousands of people lost their jobs. so as you can imagine the quality of life went way down. This all paved the way for hitler because he basically gave the germans what they wanted, a scapegoat, (the jews). ...Show more
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer. Anonymous
1 decade ago
Lots of reparations made Germany miss one payment, which made france invade the ruhr, which made the workers strike, which made loads of the dead. also led to hyperinflation, gave hitler stuff to be angry at and scapegoats (november criminals), divided the nation (sudetenland, upper silesia, west prussia). also reduced army to 100,000 men, no air force, reduced navy. basically crippled the country, especiallu under ebert, but when stresemann came along, he secured the dawes plan and the locarno treaty which secured the economy. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090611120451AA4m9cr |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1381240901#3_2907747305 | Title: who sings the song operator? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: who sings the song operator?
All Categories
who sings the song operator?
3 Answers
Content: No matter, if you were upfront about what you wanted you wouldn't be telling me and whoever else that you wanted the cover, done by a woman. Ok? Learn this for next time. ...Show more
Source (s): http://www.lyricsfreak.com/j/jim+croce/operator_10... (Tori Amos) http://www.hereinmyhead.com/collect/beesides/opera... YouTube Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOLHa3bdk6s
khubba
5 years ago
The track was once in the beginning sung (and written) by means of Jim Croce (assuming we are speaking approximately the identical one). Recent covers had been by means of: Jesse Malin - whose rendition appears to be piped over particularly a couple of retail shops' soundsystems and is greatly nasal Toby Lightman - whose pensive alto vocals and piano accompaniment makes her variant noteworthy. ...Show more
suedon68
Lv 4
1 decade ago
Jim Croce Great song. Just found a version by Toby Lightman on itunes this might be the one you are looking for. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090823125942AA3XIwZ |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1381240901#4_2907748602 | Title: who sings the song operator? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: who sings the song operator?
All Categories
who sings the song operator?
3 Answers
Content: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOLHa3bdk6s
khubba
5 years ago
The track was once in the beginning sung (and written) by means of Jim Croce (assuming we are speaking approximately the identical one). Recent covers had been by means of: Jesse Malin - whose rendition appears to be piped over particularly a couple of retail shops' soundsystems and is greatly nasal Toby Lightman - whose pensive alto vocals and piano accompaniment makes her variant noteworthy. ...Show more
suedon68
Lv 4
1 decade ago
Jim Croce Great song. Just found a version by Toby Lightman on itunes this might be the one you are looking for. check the link below. Source (s): http://www.rhapsody.com/toby-lightman/operator
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now. Ask Question | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090823125942AA3XIwZ |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1381735639#0_2908915919 | Title: Why did constantine move rome to constantinople? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Why did constantine move rome to constantinople?
Anonymous
Why did constantine move rome to constantinople?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: Why did constantine move rome to constantinople? | Yahoo Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
asked in Arts & Humanities History · 1 decade ago
Why did constantine move rome to constantinople? 5 Answers
Relevance
Iron Man
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
More accuately, he abondoned the city of Rome as the capital of his empire and built a new capital, called Constantinople (Greek for City of Constantine). Here are some reasons: The Western part of the empire was becoming militarily vulnerable and he wanted the capital to be in a safer part of the empire. The western part of the empire was becoming populated more and more by Germanic tribes who were less "Roman" than the inhabitants of the eastern part of the empire and so an eastern location was preferable. Finally, the eastern part of the empire was wealthier and locating the capital there would allow better administration and military protection of the best part of the empire. ...Show more
Source (s): There are many many books on Constantine and the history of the Roman empire. I'm sure one is available at your local library. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090901194257AAM3UF9 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1381735639#1_2908917439 | Title: Why did constantine move rome to constantinople? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Why did constantine move rome to constantinople?
Anonymous
Why did constantine move rome to constantinople?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: The western part of the empire was becoming populated more and more by Germanic tribes who were less "Roman" than the inhabitants of the eastern part of the empire and so an eastern location was preferable. Finally, the eastern part of the empire was wealthier and locating the capital there would allow better administration and military protection of the best part of the empire. ...Show more
Source (s): There are many many books on Constantine and the history of the Roman empire. I'm sure one is available at your local library. Anonymous
1 decade ago
Constantine is perhaps most famous for the great city which came to bear his name - Constantinople. He came to the conclusion that Rome had ceased to be a practical capital for the empire from which the emperor could exact effective control over its frontiers. For a while he set up court in different places; Treviri (Trier), Arelate (Arles), Mediolanum (Milan), Ticinum, Sirmium and Serdica (Sofia). Then he decided on the ancient Greek city of Byzantium. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090901194257AAM3UF9 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1381735639#2_2908918881 | Title: Why did constantine move rome to constantinople? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Why did constantine move rome to constantinople?
Anonymous
Why did constantine move rome to constantinople?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: Anonymous
1 decade ago
Constantine is perhaps most famous for the great city which came to bear his name - Constantinople. He came to the conclusion that Rome had ceased to be a practical capital for the empire from which the emperor could exact effective control over its frontiers. For a while he set up court in different places; Treviri (Trier), Arelate (Arles), Mediolanum (Milan), Ticinum, Sirmium and Serdica (Sofia). Then he decided on the ancient Greek city of Byzantium. And on 8 November AD 324 Constantine created his new capital there, renaming it Constantinopolis (City of Constantine). ...Show more
Kellsie
5 years ago
This Site Might Help You. RE: Why did constantine move rome to constantinople? Source (s): | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090901194257AAM3UF9 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1382905808#4_2911738849 | Title: Why were the 13 colonies founded? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Why were the 13 colonies founded?
Why were the 13 colonies founded?
9 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: Anonymous
7 years ago
The Carolinas
(Southern Colony) It was founded by supporters of Charles II for farming and trade. It later split into North and South Carolina.
Connecticut
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1635 by Thomas Hooker and his followers for political and religious freedom after a disagreement with Massachusetts Bay
Delaware
(Middle Colony) It was founded in 1776. Georgia
(Southern Colony) It was founded by James Oglethorpe for relief for poor English and as a buffer between Spanish Florida and The Carolinas. Maryland
(Southern Colony) It was founded by Lord Baltimore and other Catholics for religious freedom.
Massachusetts Bay
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1630 by Puritans for religious freedom. New Hampshire
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1692 by John Mason for farming.
New Jersey
(Middle Colony) It was founded in 1664 for farming and trade. New York
(Middle Colony) It was founded by the Dutch for trade and furs and became an English Colony in 1664.
Pennsylvania
(Middle Colony) It was founded by William Penn and some other Quakers for religious freedom.
Plymouth
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1620 by Seperatist Pilgrims for religious freedom. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090923044331AAeXDfO |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1382905808#5_2911740573 | Title: Why were the 13 colonies founded? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Why were the 13 colonies founded?
Why were the 13 colonies founded?
9 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content:
Massachusetts Bay
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1630 by Puritans for religious freedom. New Hampshire
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1692 by John Mason for farming.
New Jersey
(Middle Colony) It was founded in 1664 for farming and trade. New York
(Middle Colony) It was founded by the Dutch for trade and furs and became an English Colony in 1664.
Pennsylvania
(Middle Colony) It was founded by William Penn and some other Quakers for religious freedom.
Plymouth
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1620 by Seperatist Pilgrims for religious freedom.
Rhode Island
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1636 by Roger Williams and his supporters for religious freedom and seperation of church from state after a disagreement with Massachusetts Bay.
Virginia
(Southern Colony) It was founded in 1607 by the London Company to find gold.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Quizlet
Sign Up
Help
Mobile
Students
Teachers
About Quizlet
Company
Jobs
Privacy
Terms
Contact
Study Everywhere! © 2014 Quizlet LLC. Follow @quizlet on Twitter. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090923044331AAeXDfO |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1382905808#7_2911744177 | Title: Why were the 13 colonies founded? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Why were the 13 colonies founded?
Why were the 13 colonies founded?
9 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: Quizlet
Create a Set
Log In
Sign Up Google Sign In
13 colonies and their Reasons for Founding
13 terms by natykot
Ready to study? Start with Flashcards
Study
Flashcards
Learn
Speller
Test
Play
Scatter
Space Race
Tools
Copy
Add to Class
Add to Folder
Share
Print
More
List
Scores
Info
AdvertisementUpgrade to remove ads
Original Alphabetical
The Carolinas
(Southern Colony) It was founded by supporters of Charles II for farming and trade. It later split into North and South Carolina.
Connecticut
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1635 by Thomas Hooker and his followers for political and religious freedom after a disagreement with Massachusetts Bay.
Delaware
(Middle Colony) It was founded in 1776.
Georgia
(Southern Colony) It was founded by James Oglethorpe for relief for poor English and as a buffer between Spanish Florida and The Carolinas.
Maryland
(Southern Colony) It was founded by Lord Baltimore and other Catholics for religious freedom.
Massachusetts Bay
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1630 by Puritans for religious freedom.
New Hampshire
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1692 by John Mason for farming.
New Jersey
(Middle Colony) It was founded in 1664 for farming and trade. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090923044331AAeXDfO |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1382905808#8_2911746123 | Title: Why were the 13 colonies founded? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Why were the 13 colonies founded?
Why were the 13 colonies founded?
9 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content:
Georgia
(Southern Colony) It was founded by James Oglethorpe for relief for poor English and as a buffer between Spanish Florida and The Carolinas.
Maryland
(Southern Colony) It was founded by Lord Baltimore and other Catholics for religious freedom.
Massachusetts Bay
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1630 by Puritans for religious freedom.
New Hampshire
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1692 by John Mason for farming.
New Jersey
(Middle Colony) It was founded in 1664 for farming and trade.
New York
(Middle Colony) It was founded by the Dutch for trade and furs and became an English Colony in 1664.
Pennsylvania
(Middle Colony) It was founded by William Penn and some other Quakers for religious freedom.
Plymouth
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1620 by Seperatist Pilgrims for religious freedom.
Rhode Island
(New England Colony) It was founded in 1636 by Roger Williams and his supporters for religious freedom and seperation of church from state after a disagreement with Massachusetts Bay.
Virginia
(Southern Colony) It was founded in 1607 by the London Company to find gold. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090923044331AAeXDfO |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1384205827#3_2914883148 | Title: Summary of the annexation of Hawaii? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Summary of the annexation of Hawaii?
Summary of the annexation of Hawaii?
7 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Content: When Queen
Liliuokalani moved to establish a stronger monarchy, Americans under
the leadership of Samuel Dole deposed her in 1893. The planters' belief
that a coup and annexation by the United States would remove the threat
of a devastating tariff on their sugar also spurred them to action. The
administration of President Benjamin Harrison encouraged the takeover,
and dispatched sailors from the USS Boston to the islands to surround
the royal palace. The U.S. minister to Hawaii, John L. Stevens, worked
closely with the new government. Dole sent a delegation to Washington in 1894 seeking annexation, but
the new President, Grover Cleveland, opposed annexation and tried to
restore the Queen. Dole declared Hawaii an independent republic. Spurred by the nationalism aroused by the Spanish-American War, the
United States annexed Hawaii in 1898 at the urging of President William
McKinley. Hawaii was made a territory in 1900, and Dole became its
first governor. Racial attitudes and party politics in the United
States deferred statehood until a bipartisan compromise linked Hawaii's
status to Alaska, and both became states in 1959. ...Show more
Anonymous
6 years ago
This Site Might Help You. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091015224714AAKUV9M |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1387438194#1_2922668746 | Title: What makes someone eligible for the death penalty? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What makes someone eligible for the death penalty?
What makes someone eligible for the death penalty?
10 Answers
Content: if you kill # of people you can ge the death penalty? What is the policy? Is it just if the jury feels like it they can give someone the death penalty? Are there any people that do not qualify for the death penalty? 10 Answers
Relevance
Susan S
Lv 7
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
It varies by state and the application of the death penalty
has been arbitrary. In some states, the defendant can be sentenced to death even if he was not the actual killer. This has happened, most recently in Texas. Robert Lee Thompson was executed for the killing carried out by his robbery accomplice who was sentenced to life. The standards can be very subjective. If the defendant has access to a good lawyer he won't be facing the death penalty. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091212072231AAqKH0R |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1387438194#2_2922669879 | Title: What makes someone eligible for the death penalty? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What makes someone eligible for the death penalty?
What makes someone eligible for the death penalty?
10 Answers
Content: In some states, the defendant can be sentenced to death even if he was not the actual killer. This has happened, most recently in Texas. Robert Lee Thompson was executed for the killing carried out by his robbery accomplice who was sentenced to life. The standards can be very subjective. If the defendant has access to a good lawyer he won't be facing the death penalty. Practically all defendants who were sentenced to death were too poor to afford a private attorney. The death penalty doesn't apply to the worst crimes, it applies to defendants with the worst lawyers. Apart from this, death penalty cases involve two trials. The first one is to determine guilt or innocence. If there is a conviction, the second trial is to decide if the death penalty should apply. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091212072231AAqKH0R |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1387438194#3_2922671046 | Title: What makes someone eligible for the death penalty? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What makes someone eligible for the death penalty?
What makes someone eligible for the death penalty?
10 Answers
Content: Practically all defendants who were sentenced to death were too poor to afford a private attorney. The death penalty doesn't apply to the worst crimes, it applies to defendants with the worst lawyers. Apart from this, death penalty cases involve two trials. The first one is to determine guilt or innocence. If there is a conviction, the second trial is to decide if the death penalty should apply. This involves much more than the crime. The defendant's entire life is put under a microscope. Jurors must consider the defendant's upbringing, mental health history and much more. This phase of the case is the "mitigation phase." And there is no totally objective standard for it. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091212072231AAqKH0R |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1387438194#4_2922672125 | Title: What makes someone eligible for the death penalty? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What makes someone eligible for the death penalty?
What makes someone eligible for the death penalty?
10 Answers
Content: This involves much more than the crime. The defendant's entire life is put under a microscope. Jurors must consider the defendant's upbringing, mental health history and much more. This phase of the case is the "mitigation phase." And there is no totally objective standard for it. For more about this take a look at http://deathpenaltyinfo.org/state_by_state especially at whether a defendant can get death for a felony in which s/he was not responsible for the murder? Also you can have a look at http://deathpenaltyinfo.org/arbitrariness
...Show more
Kini
Lv 7
1 decade ago
The death penalty is the sentence in very few cases before the court. Each state has its own laws and sentences vary depending on a lot of factors. Sometimes there are plea bargains made in exchange for information so the death penalty is off the table. Even when death penalty is imposed there are so many appeals it takes 10 to 20 years for an execution. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091212072231AAqKH0R |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1387438194#5_2922673463 | Title: What makes someone eligible for the death penalty? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What makes someone eligible for the death penalty?
What makes someone eligible for the death penalty?
10 Answers
Content: For more about this take a look at http://deathpenaltyinfo.org/state_by_state especially at whether a defendant can get death for a felony in which s/he was not responsible for the murder? Also you can have a look at http://deathpenaltyinfo.org/arbitrariness
...Show more
Kini
Lv 7
1 decade ago
The death penalty is the sentence in very few cases before the court. Each state has its own laws and sentences vary depending on a lot of factors. Sometimes there are plea bargains made in exchange for information so the death penalty is off the table. Even when death penalty is imposed there are so many appeals it takes 10 to 20 years for an execution. Are you thinking about the 5 men accused of terrorism? That is a different thing than plain old murder. ...Show more
Anonymous
1 decade ago
Depends on the state they are in, as every state makes their own rules regarding this. Most of the time it has to be a case of pre-meditated murder. Where you planned it out beforehand. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091212072231AAqKH0R |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1387438194#6_2922674846 | Title: What makes someone eligible for the death penalty? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What makes someone eligible for the death penalty?
What makes someone eligible for the death penalty?
10 Answers
Content: Are you thinking about the 5 men accused of terrorism? That is a different thing than plain old murder. ...Show more
Anonymous
1 decade ago
Depends on the state they are in, as every state makes their own rules regarding this. Most of the time it has to be a case of pre-meditated murder. Where you planned it out beforehand. It doesnt really matter how many people you have killed. Some people get the death penalty for killing one person, others have killed dozens and did not receive it. This is one objection i have towards the death penalty-it is not carried out equally. ...Show more
Briggs
1 decade ago
got this from the New Hampshire Criminal Code. It varies state to state but typically you are convicted of capitol murder. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091212072231AAqKH0R |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1387528226#15_2922897259 | Title: Why Study The Holocaust? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Why Study The Holocaust?
Why Study The Holocaust?
10 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Content: i think the holocaust is very important part of learning about our history because as time goes on the number of people who were actually there and experienced the pain of loosing everything will be diminish and we have to be the ones to tell future generations what happened during the Holocaust. if no one knew about the holocaust it'll just be forgotten and the people who died's lives will all be in vain because as they say if we don't study history we'll be doomed to repeat it
...Show more
? 1 decade ago
The Holocaust is the termed used on the horrendous extermination of millions of Jews during the Hitler barbaric era. There is a necessity to study the subject matter in order to awaken the awareness of the people of the effects of war and the arrogance of one class of people over another people's class or ethnicity. By studying the Holocaust, one will understand and inculcate to himself/herself of the respect due to every human beings. And had the Holocaust did not happen, peace at least we would reign in the Middle East. In my simple understanding, discrimination is a sociological term referring to discriminatory behaviors which may involve some form of exclusion or rejection against another class or category of people on the basis of their race, color and creed. It maybe very hard to stop because in many countries all over the world, discrimination has been embedded in their blood. But the least we can do if not stopping at all is lessen. Through proper education and inculcation of historical aspects of every race, understanding their beings, discrimination or prejudice maybe lessen leading towards its total stoppage. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091213175456AAlyuo5 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1389603072#11_2927933086 | Title:
Headings:
Content: 40
Anonymous
1 decade ago
I think harry Nilsson sang it first, if not wrote it
10
Hillary
1 decade ago
Badfinger, then Air Supply, then Mariah Carey..
14
Show more answers (11)
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now. Ask Question
+100
Join Yahoo Answers and get 100 points today. Join
Trending Questions
Trending Questions
Songs about loving 2 people at the same time? 9 answers
Is it normal to like a person music but not like them as a person ? 5 answers
How to explain the song "future is female" to my young son? 5 answers
Songs about choosing between two lovers? ( two guys/girls, etc)? 4 answers
Song you hate and why? 12 answers
Answer Questions
Answer Questions
Is there a tune that has your user name in the title or lyrics? | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100120104028AACBKmC |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1390795126#3_2930768125 | Title: will it be harder for me to get a job after college if I go to an online college instead of a regular one? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: will it be harder for me to get a job after college if I go to an online college instead of a regular one?
will it be harder for me to get a job after college if I go to an online college instead of a regular one?
8 Answers
Content: In all studies done over the past 10 years at all levels, the traditional degree will be accepted by employers before the online degree without exception if all other things are equal. All other things are rarely equal. ( there is a recent US Dept of Education study that tells us that online students learn more than their classroom counterparts - but it doesn't say employers like online better)
So if you're weighing whether an online degree from UMass will be treated the same as a traditional degree from UMass (comparing apples-to-apples) then no, it won't. Neither will be considered equal to a traditional from Harvard, Yale, Princeton, MIT, et al either. But an online from UMass WILL usually be considered higher than a traditional from Strayer or East Podunk State (comparing apples-to-oranges). It's all about the reputation of the particular college. Points to consider whether online or on-campus or hybrid: 1) the college needs to be regionally accredited. You can check that online here http://www.chea.org/search/search.asp the regional accreditors are listed here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regional_accreditatio...
2) the reputation of the college itself is more important than whether it's online or traditional or a combination. An online degree from U Florida or UMass is generally considered more highly than a traditional (on campus) degree from U Phoenix or Strayer for example. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100210083112AANqDuQ |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1390795126#8_2930776776 | Title: will it be harder for me to get a job after college if I go to an online college instead of a regular one? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: will it be harder for me to get a job after college if I go to an online college instead of a regular one?
will it be harder for me to get a job after college if I go to an online college instead of a regular one?
8 Answers
Content: There are indeed colleges out there with a bad reputation and you just don't want to be associated with them if you can help it. Some employers really do refuse to hire from some schools. Some employers also go to the other extreme and only hire from a couple top schools. Nearly everyone teaches online these days, it's now a normal form of course delivery. That everyone includes your state U and your local community college. Those "as seen on TV" colleges are rarely your best option. You'll also find that if you're a 21 year old fresh college graduate with no work experience that your degree has a lot more impact on hiring than if you're an experienced 30-something. ...Show more
DaveInSeoul
Lv 5
1 decade ago
Caderbug's answer would be the same as mine. I am a hiring manager, and if I had to choose between a student that went to a 'brick and mortar' university and an ACCREDITED on-line university, I would look harder at the on-line student. Most on-line students (especially those with full time jobs - which most of them have) just have a higher sense of dedication and all the other qualities I'm looking for in a full-time hire. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100210083112AANqDuQ |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1391173102#0_2931680878 | Title: I've been told I'm opinionated, what does mean and why are people opinionated? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: I've been told I'm opinionated, what does mean and why are people opinionated?
Anonymous
I've been told I'm opinionated, what does mean and why are people opinionated?
10 Answers
Anonymous
Content: I've been told I'm opinionated, what does mean and why are people opinionated? | Yahoo Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
asked in Social Science Psychology · 1 decade ago
I've been told I'm opinionated, what does mean and why are people opinionated? 10 Answers
Relevance
The First Dragon
Lv 7
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
"Opinionated" means that you have strong opinions, and you are more inclined to express your strong opinions than the average person is. Everybody has opinions. Not everybody is outspoken in expressing them. It is not bad to be opinionated, but an opinionated person should be cautious not to cross over the line into insensitivity or rudeness. Some opinionated people are careful about this, and others aren't. The opinionated person might also be tempted to get into arguments with other opinionated people who don't agree with them. This can be good or bad. Argument, if done without malice, can help clarify issues and even sometimes changes somebody's opinion. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100216065937AAh9d3C |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1393054509#5_2936172949 | Title: What did people do for entertainment in the 1800s? During the Industrial Revolution? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What did people do for entertainment in the 1800s? During the Industrial Revolution?
Anonymous
What did people do for entertainment in the 1800s? During the Industrial Revolution?
5 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Content: Only with sanitation, and realizing that dumping sewage into the river below your town, only meant the next town would catch your diseases, did things change. The wealthy had concerts in their homes , and plays in theatres they held in their homes for thier friends.... and amusements with lutenists and minstrels, and wandering poets, and story tellers were in any rather larger town. They would go from one town to the next....
The field worker had very little and usually lived a long distance from a town.... society didn't suddenly go from agricultural to factories. All --men women, and particularly children.... worked from sun up, to sun down, and had church on Sundays where they'd socialize. Most people were workers, so there was little in the way of entertainment. Symphonies such as what we have today, could only be hired by the wealthy. In the 1700's if you were lucky enough to live in a big town as a factory worker, you went to the big church on Sundays, and you heard organ music by Bach, or others, and/or string quartets or quintets, supported by the church, which you supported with your contributions. Kids had games they played... you likely can google some of them.... Children's games of the 1700's or something similar. Girls learned to sew, men learned to make and use tools, and as well, work in the emerging factories. Bottom line? | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100317113801AANruf1 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1393054509#6_2936174894 | Title: What did people do for entertainment in the 1800s? During the Industrial Revolution? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What did people do for entertainment in the 1800s? During the Industrial Revolution?
Anonymous
What did people do for entertainment in the 1800s? During the Industrial Revolution?
5 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Content: Symphonies such as what we have today, could only be hired by the wealthy. In the 1700's if you were lucky enough to live in a big town as a factory worker, you went to the big church on Sundays, and you heard organ music by Bach, or others, and/or string quartets or quintets, supported by the church, which you supported with your contributions. Kids had games they played... you likely can google some of them.... Children's games of the 1700's or something similar. Girls learned to sew, men learned to make and use tools, and as well, work in the emerging factories. Bottom line? There was not the time then we have to day to develop hobbies, and have time for entertainment. ...Show more
Source (s): history teacher 26 years. Anonymous
5 years ago
it depends on what the food was. examples ? | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100317113801AANruf1 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1393236490#3_2936604401 | Title: what did the treaty of versailles do to germany? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: what did the treaty of versailles do to germany?
what did the treaty of versailles do to germany?
7 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Content: Original figure was 6,600,000,000 goldmakrs, an very harsh but possible figure; this was reduced by the Dawes Plan and the Young Plan later). One must not forget that Germany enforced even harsher terms on Russia in the treaty of Brest-Litovsk, so the complaints may sound somewhat hypocritic. However, having to accept the blame really angered many Germans, as they saw the war as the result of everyone's mistakes. Another humuiliating condition was the ban from putting Germany soldiers into the Rhineland (next to France), which made the industrial area of Ruhr very vulnerable. Overall Germany lost about 10% of its industries. American loans, however, were helpful in paying the reparations and economy had every chance to recover (which it did). The wish to cancel the treaty's terms became dominant in German politicls until the end of the Weimar republic, with Gustav Stresemann attempting to do so by negotiations and Germany eventually going to WW2, and although the treaty was just one of the causes, it did play an important role. ...Show more
Anonymous
5 years ago
The tradition of reparations, which I presume is the subject of your question, goes back further than the First World War (crucial to the tradition is that the loser pays them – not the winner, which is why France, Serbia and Britain did not pay reparations). The loss of territory is also a traditional characteristic of treaties that conclude wars. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100320084753AAhFA7Q |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1393236490#4_2936606302 | Title: what did the treaty of versailles do to germany? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: what did the treaty of versailles do to germany?
what did the treaty of versailles do to germany?
7 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Content: Overall Germany lost about 10% of its industries. American loans, however, were helpful in paying the reparations and economy had every chance to recover (which it did). The wish to cancel the treaty's terms became dominant in German politicls until the end of the Weimar republic, with Gustav Stresemann attempting to do so by negotiations and Germany eventually going to WW2, and although the treaty was just one of the causes, it did play an important role. ...Show more
Anonymous
5 years ago
The tradition of reparations, which I presume is the subject of your question, goes back further than the First World War (crucial to the tradition is that the loser pays them – not the winner, which is why France, Serbia and Britain did not pay reparations). The loss of territory is also a traditional characteristic of treaties that conclude wars. Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman empires had separate treaties, Versailles was specifically about Germany. Russia had already made a separate peace with Germany when the Revolution swept through the country overturning any ability to wage war. Britain and France required that Germany paid reparations, the reason that they were so steep (apart from the basic need to compensate those that lost limbs and loved ones) was that Germany had place exorbitant costs on the French at the conclusion of the Franco-Prussian War. ...Show more
Anonymous
1 decade ago
1- the Germans had to take the blame of having started the whole war
2- the had to pay a LOT of money in reparations, but the figure was lowered after a while. If they had to pay the initial amount of money decided upon, Germany would still owe money. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100320084753AAhFA7Q |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1397414447#4_2946677769 | Title: Why do you personally enjoy reading and writing? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Why do you personally enjoy reading and writing?
Why do you personally enjoy reading and writing?
10 Answers
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
Anonymous
Content: Whether that world is an alien planet, or a fantasy land, or a regular old downtown street... stories help us grasp who we are and where we are in this rich landscape of life. Hope that answers your question :)
...Show more
Amb_writes (is writing again)
Lv 4
1 decade ago
I love reading for many reasons. Sometimes I just want something to do during extra time in classes. Sometimes it helps put me to sleep. And other times, I just really love getting into stories. It's a way to escape whatever's going on around you and live a while in someone else's world. It's also a good therapy - reading books about things you've been through. Then you know you're not alone. I enjoy writing because for once im in control. I make the characters, I control their actions and I can make a happy ending. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100602090734AAgULeI |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1400987615#0_2955316884 | Title: what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch?
what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch?
6 Answers
Anonymous
Content: what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch? | Yahoo Answers
senkai
senkai
asked in Politics & Government Government · 1 decade ago
what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch? government
6 Answers
Relevance
Erik
Lv 7
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
The executive branch has the power to nominate new supreme court judges, which congress approves. Otherwise, the judicial branch is supposed to be independent. Bethany J
Lv 6
1 decade ago
All three branches of government are supposed to have the same power. It's a system of checks and balances. However, since Obama is loading up the Supreme Court and the Dems control both houses, the balance is not equal. The Executive branch has more power. ...Show more
Anonymous
1 decade ago
Executive branch runs on Acts, Amendments and Laws, Judicial branch has the power to make precedents to pertain to the unique circumstances of each case within a court. However executive outranks and over rules judicial. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100818201530AA5YeXy |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1400987615#1_2955318356 | Title: what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch?
what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch?
6 Answers
Anonymous
Content: It's a system of checks and balances. However, since Obama is loading up the Supreme Court and the Dems control both houses, the balance is not equal. The Executive branch has more power. ...Show more
Anonymous
1 decade ago
Executive branch runs on Acts, Amendments and Laws, Judicial branch has the power to make precedents to pertain to the unique circumstances of each case within a court. However executive outranks and over rules judicial. That is to say if the Judicial branch makes a precedent on a specific area of the law and then the Executive branch decides to make a law on that same specific area, the Executive decision is taken as authority and the precedent must be disregarded. Hope this helps
...Show more
JOE
Lv 6
1 decade ago
Only the power to appoint and then this must be approved by the legislative branch so no one branch has any power over the other this is called check and balance which is at the heart of our government except sometimes some judges legislate from the bench and circumvent the intent of the checks and balance system and this must stop or we will face a bad future
...Show more
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer. eneida
5 years ago
Get a No Cost Background Check Scan at https://biturl.im/aURgD
Its a sensible way to start. The site allows you to do a no cost scan simply to find out if any sort of data is in existence. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100818201530AA5YeXy |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1400987615#2_2955320228 | Title: what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch?
what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch?
6 Answers
Anonymous
Content: That is to say if the Judicial branch makes a precedent on a specific area of the law and then the Executive branch decides to make a law on that same specific area, the Executive decision is taken as authority and the precedent must be disregarded. Hope this helps
...Show more
JOE
Lv 6
1 decade ago
Only the power to appoint and then this must be approved by the legislative branch so no one branch has any power over the other this is called check and balance which is at the heart of our government except sometimes some judges legislate from the bench and circumvent the intent of the checks and balance system and this must stop or we will face a bad future
...Show more
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer. eneida
5 years ago
Get a No Cost Background Check Scan at https://biturl.im/aURgD
Its a sensible way to start. The site allows you to do a no cost scan simply to find out if any sort of data is in existence. A smaller analysis is done without cost. To get a detailed report its a modest payment. You may not realize how many good reasons there are to try and find out more about the people around you. After all, whether you're talking about new friends, employees, doctors, caretakers for elderly family members, or even significant others, you, as a citizen, have a right to know whether the people you surround yourself with are who they say they are. This goes double in any situation that involves your children, which not only includes teachers and babysitters, but also scout masters, little league coaches and others. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100818201530AA5YeXy |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1400987615#3_2955322270 | Title: what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch?
what power does the executive branch have over the judicial branch?
6 Answers
Anonymous
Content: A smaller analysis is done without cost. To get a detailed report its a modest payment. You may not realize how many good reasons there are to try and find out more about the people around you. After all, whether you're talking about new friends, employees, doctors, caretakers for elderly family members, or even significant others, you, as a citizen, have a right to know whether the people you surround yourself with are who they say they are. This goes double in any situation that involves your children, which not only includes teachers and babysitters, but also scout masters, little league coaches and others. Bottom line, if you want to find out more about someone, you should perform a background check. ...Show more
hottotrot1_usa
Lv 7
1 decade ago
The Exec branch appoints the judges, with the consent of the Senate. Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now. Ask Question | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100818201530AA5YeXy |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1401788716#14_2957272702 | Title: Cigarette smoke smell stuck on the walls? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Cigarette smoke smell stuck on the walls?
Cigarette smoke smell stuck on the walls?
10 Answers
Content: Wash the walls with it and mop the floors with it too. Good luck. Woodmanchue
1 decade ago
I have used Ajax & water with an old scotch bright scrubbie sponge. If you get the paint color on the scrubbie, you are taking off the paint. I like good, hot showers. After the shower, I would have brown streaks, running down the wall. The smoke "residue" will come off of good paint. Just get it good & wet, then sponge off. ...Show more
Source (s): eperience
Ameh
1 decade ago
Spray your walls with "Spray-Nine" and wash them down with a cloth and water,
Spray-Nine melts the smoke off walls, it's amazing! | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100910220004AAbKIWL |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1401788716#15_2957273685 | Title: Cigarette smoke smell stuck on the walls? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Cigarette smoke smell stuck on the walls?
Cigarette smoke smell stuck on the walls?
10 Answers
Content: After the shower, I would have brown streaks, running down the wall. The smoke "residue" will come off of good paint. Just get it good & wet, then sponge off. ...Show more
Source (s): eperience
Ameh
1 decade ago
Spray your walls with "Spray-Nine" and wash them down with a cloth and water,
Spray-Nine melts the smoke off walls, it's amazing! Oh, it'll also remove the smell too. Source (s): Own a cleaning company, deal with smoke covered walls all the time. dotsfriend
Lv 4
1 decade ago
I used to do housecleaning and **** n span with ammonia works great. Mix equal parts to water and wash walls and floors. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100910220004AAbKIWL |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1407203032#8_2970280628 | Title: Why are some babies born premature? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Why are some babies born premature?
Why are some babies born premature?
13 Answers
What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
Content: RIP baby Cameron
...Show more
Source (s): hope this helps. and yes, smoking, drinking, and doing drugs can also cause this. Pippin
Lv 7
1 decade ago
There are dozens and hundreds of possible reasons a baby might be born prematurely. Smoking does indeed increase the risk, and so do illicit drugs. The woman may have an incompetent cervix, or suffer some form of trauma (an auto accident or severe fall), or have an underlying medical condition. But in many cases there is no obvious reason -- sometimes it 'just happens.' (At 4 months it wasn't a premature birth, but a late miscarriage. Anything up to 20 weeks is considered a miscarriage.) EDIT: | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110118112959AA9gMUB |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1409006366#2_2974627509 | Title: How did the Cold war affect American life? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: How did the Cold war affect American life?
All Categories
Trending News
How did the Cold war affect American life?
4 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: It also lead to popular depictions of Russians as evil in children cartoons with "evil" characters usually having Russian accents. ...Show more
Anonymous
4 years ago
Cold War Effects On America
Source (s): https://shrinke.im/a9e7G
P.O.U.M.
Lv 6
1 decade ago
The Cold War had a very negative effect on American life then, and even today. In the 1950s, the U.S. was a scary place. Many people were convinced that a Communist plot to overthrow the government was imminent and saw conspiracies in every aspect of society. Since these anti-communist thoughts were accepted by so many, no one was safe from suspicion. Everyone was a suspect and anyone could at any given time moment be called in for questioning by the so-called "House Committee on Un-American Activities." That alone could cause you to be ostracized by everyone you knew, even if you were found not guilty of anything! In fact, it is compelling how closely U.S. society during the McCarthy era resembled the very Western views of the Communist societies of which they were afraid! ...Show more
Source (s): | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110306161616AA8ZjM0 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1409303731#5_2975350155 | Title: How does age affect perception of people? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: How does age affect perception of people?
How does age affect perception of people?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: Likewise, a 40 year old may seem like a "kid" to a 60 year old and so forth. ...Show more
Source (s): http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/ageismwoolf.html http://psychcentral.com/news/2010/03/03/age-percep...
The Name's Girly J! Lv 5
1 decade ago
Kids are viewed as either cute or bratty. Pre-teens and young teens are viewed as in a horrible spot and just trying to find themselves. Teens are viewed as arrogant and self centered but full of energy. Young adults are viewed finding their way in this world. No longer a student, but not yet a business person. Adults are viewed as having their lives together. Elderly are pittied because being old would suck. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110314135351AAoTo2x |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1409303731#6_2975351208 | Title: How does age affect perception of people? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: How does age affect perception of people?
How does age affect perception of people?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: Teens are viewed as arrogant and self centered but full of energy. Young adults are viewed finding their way in this world. No longer a student, but not yet a business person. Adults are viewed as having their lives together. Elderly are pittied because being old would suck. They also have lots of stories and life experience so they should be wiser than adults. ...Show more
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer. Anonymous
1 decade ago
Here's the lay down: Babies and children are seen as cuddly objects as affection. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110314135351AAoTo2x |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1409303731#7_2975352156 | Title: How does age affect perception of people? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: How does age affect perception of people?
How does age affect perception of people?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: They also have lots of stories and life experience so they should be wiser than adults. ...Show more
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer. Anonymous
1 decade ago
Here's the lay down: Babies and children are seen as cuddly objects as affection. Pre-teens are seen annoying
Teens are seen as arrogant, stupid, and party animals
Young adults (nowadays) are seen as arrogant, stupid, and party animals. Middle aged adults are viewed as wise and important. Elderly people are pitied and viewed as mentally drained people who don't know where they even are anymore. This just goes to show how biased middle aged people are. Kevin: | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110314135351AAoTo2x |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1409303731#8_2975353211 | Title: How does age affect perception of people? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: How does age affect perception of people?
How does age affect perception of people?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: Pre-teens are seen annoying
Teens are seen as arrogant, stupid, and party animals
Young adults (nowadays) are seen as arrogant, stupid, and party animals. Middle aged adults are viewed as wise and important. Elderly people are pitied and viewed as mentally drained people who don't know where they even are anymore. This just goes to show how biased middle aged people are. Kevin: It was actually: " When I was a boy of 14 I thought my father didn't know a thing; when I became a man of 21, I was amazed to see how much the old geezer had learned in seven years." ...Show more
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110314135351AAoTo2x |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1411046098#0_2979487232 | Title: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
Anonymous
why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed? | Yahoo Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
asked in Arts & Humanities History · 1 decade ago
why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed? i need REALLY good information and fast because it's due this Monday ( 4/2/11 ) SO Please help! i need maybe a good paragraph or two some websites on why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed. THANKS FOR THE HELP!!!! 5 Answers
Relevance
staisil
Lv 7
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
The Massachusetts Bay Colony was among the original colonial settlements in the area that is now the United States. Settled by English colonists in 1630, the colony was centered in Boston and Salem and represented the area that blossomed into the state of Massachusetts. The colony was established by the Massachusetts Bay Company and was probably the third major, permanent settlement in the future U.S. colonies. It followed settlements at Jamestown and Plymouth. Following the settlement of Plymouth in 1620 by Puritans on the Mayflower and seeking to separate from the Church of England, the Sheffield Land Patent was given to the predecessor of the Massachusetts Bay Company in 1623. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110428135316AA66qI8 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1411046098#1_2979488860 | Title: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
Anonymous
why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: 5 Answers
Relevance
staisil
Lv 7
1 decade ago
Favorite Answer
The Massachusetts Bay Colony was among the original colonial settlements in the area that is now the United States. Settled by English colonists in 1630, the colony was centered in Boston and Salem and represented the area that blossomed into the state of Massachusetts. The colony was established by the Massachusetts Bay Company and was probably the third major, permanent settlement in the future U.S. colonies. It followed settlements at Jamestown and Plymouth. Following the settlement of Plymouth in 1620 by Puritans on the Mayflower and seeking to separate from the Church of England, the Sheffield Land Patent was given to the predecessor of the Massachusetts Bay Company in 1623. Settling Gloucester, Massachusetts, the group left after 3 years. This group, the Dorchester Company, was followed by the New England Company in 1628 and was superseded by the Massachusetts Bay Company in 1630. The Massachusetts Bay Colony offered the promise of a new start. Many disillusioned Englishmen, weary from religious persecution from the English Church, looked for freedom to practice their new Puritanism away from the king. They sought economic stability in a land prosperous with trading and farming opportunities, and they looked forward to the abundance of natural resources to allow their success in this new land. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110428135316AA66qI8 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1411046098#2_2979490694 | Title: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
Anonymous
why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: Settling Gloucester, Massachusetts, the group left after 3 years. This group, the Dorchester Company, was followed by the New England Company in 1628 and was superseded by the Massachusetts Bay Company in 1630. The Massachusetts Bay Colony offered the promise of a new start. Many disillusioned Englishmen, weary from religious persecution from the English Church, looked for freedom to practice their new Puritanism away from the king. They sought economic stability in a land prosperous with trading and farming opportunities, and they looked forward to the abundance of natural resources to allow their success in this new land. The Massachusetts Bay Colony lasted its first year and remained one of the important 17th-century colonies of early America. It continued to prosper into the later century, later branching out and combining with important colonies in Boston and the surrounding areas. The colony spawned such names as John Winthrop, its first governor; Roger Williams, an important early minister; and Anne Hutchinson, an important Puritan and early feminist. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110428135316AA66qI8 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1411046098#3_2979492215 | Title: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
Anonymous
why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: The Massachusetts Bay Colony lasted its first year and remained one of the important 17th-century colonies of early America. It continued to prosper into the later century, later branching out and combining with important colonies in Boston and the surrounding areas. The colony spawned such names as John Winthrop, its first governor; Roger Williams, an important early minister; and Anne Hutchinson, an important Puritan and early feminist. In 1691, the Massachusetts Bay Colony was combined with Plymouth, Nantucket, Maine and other colonies to form the Province of Massachusetts Bay. ...Show more
Source (s): http://www.usahistory.info/New-England/Massachuset...
Anonymous
4 years ago
Who Founded Massachusetts Bay Colony
Source (s): https://shrinks.im/a8S6A
Anonymous
5 years ago
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/QjpRU
The Massachusetts Bay Colony was actually the company that the King had given the right to settle the area of the east coast north of Long Island Sound. It primarily settled around Boston and Salem. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110428135316AA66qI8 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1411046098#4_2979493722 | Title: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
Anonymous
why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: In 1691, the Massachusetts Bay Colony was combined with Plymouth, Nantucket, Maine and other colonies to form the Province of Massachusetts Bay. ...Show more
Source (s): http://www.usahistory.info/New-England/Massachuset...
Anonymous
4 years ago
Who Founded Massachusetts Bay Colony
Source (s): https://shrinks.im/a8S6A
Anonymous
5 years ago
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/QjpRU
The Massachusetts Bay Colony was actually the company that the King had given the right to settle the area of the east coast north of Long Island Sound. It primarily settled around Boston and Salem. In 1691, it was disestablished. Its lands where unified with Plymouth Colony, Martha's Vineyard, Nantucket, and the Province of Maine to form the Province of Massachusetts (or Massachusetts Colony)
...Show more
Frankie
6 years ago
This Site Might Help You. RE: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed? i need REALLY good information and fast because it's due this Monday ( 4/2/11 ) SO Please help! | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110428135316AA66qI8 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1411046098#5_2979495200 | Title: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
Anonymous
why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: In 1691, it was disestablished. Its lands where unified with Plymouth Colony, Martha's Vineyard, Nantucket, and the Province of Maine to form the Province of Massachusetts (or Massachusetts Colony)
...Show more
Frankie
6 years ago
This Site Might Help You. RE: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed? i need REALLY good information and fast because it's due this Monday ( 4/2/11 ) SO Please help! i need maybe a good paragraph or two some websites on why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed. THANKS FOR THE HELP!!!! ...Show more
Source (s): massachusetts bay colony formed: https://shortly.im/FpL5i
How do you think about the answers? | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110428135316AA66qI8 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1411046098#6_2979496312 | Title: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
Anonymous
why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed?
5 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: i need maybe a good paragraph or two some websites on why and how was the Massachusetts bay colony formed. THANKS FOR THE HELP!!!! ...Show more
Source (s): massachusetts bay colony formed: https://shortly.im/FpL5i
How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer. Anonymous
6 years ago
It was founded in 1630 and it was founded by a group of about 1,000 puritans refugees from England under governor John Winthrop. Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now. Ask Question | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110428135316AA66qI8 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1411704302#1_2981078609 | Title: Conflict in the play "A Raisin in the Sun"? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: Conflict in the play "A Raisin in the Sun"?
Trending News
Conflict in the play "A Raisin in the Sun"?
2 Answers
Content: 2 Answers
Relevance
? Lv 6
10 years ago
Favorite Answer
In the play "A Raisin in the Sun" by Lorraine Hansberry, there a several conflicts: 1. Conflict between the members of the Younger family who can't decide how to spend the $10,000 insurance check. The mother, Lena, wants to buy a house. Her son, Walter Lee, wants to invest in a liquor store. Her daughter Beneatha wants to use the money to pay for her tuition. 2. Conflict between Walter Lee and his job working as a chauffeur where he feels like he's "choking to death". 3. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110521120754AAb6Snt |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1414429016#1_2987594806 | Title: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
Anonymous
when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
6 Answers
What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
Anonymous
Content: if chemicals in smoking causes cancer for the lungs..why wouldnt the chemicals in cokes cause problems for the intestines, or stomach etc?) how cancer has increased so much MAINLY IN THE USA than any other time in history? why this is being ignored or not talked about much maybe? since when been so popular other chemicals in processed foods sucha s pizza sauces, chips, microwave "tv dinners" etc? please explain what you can. thanks for your naswers! ...Show more
6 Answers
Relevance
Jean
Lv 7
10 years ago
Favourite answer
100 years ago, people ate healthily and lived in a far cleaner environment. These days, food is loaded with preservatives, colourings, flavour enhancers, stabilisers, etc, etc, etc, sprayed with chemicals and genetically modified to grow faster, give bigger yield and to be more resistant to pests and disease. Then we take it and blast it with radiation in the microwave. Cars and industry spew chemicals into the atmosphere which rain down on us or damge the ozone layer allowing dangerous levels of solar radiation down to ground level, drugs and medications are readily available, there's the pill and estrogen can be detected in water supplies because we're peeing the hormones out, there are carcinogenic chemicals in every day beauty products, even the foundation you wear on your face, and our homes are regularly sprayed with chemicals. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110821084332AAgQmzU |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1414429016#2_2987596845 | Title: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
Anonymous
when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
6 Answers
What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
Anonymous
Content: thanks for your naswers! ...Show more
6 Answers
Relevance
Jean
Lv 7
10 years ago
Favourite answer
100 years ago, people ate healthily and lived in a far cleaner environment. These days, food is loaded with preservatives, colourings, flavour enhancers, stabilisers, etc, etc, etc, sprayed with chemicals and genetically modified to grow faster, give bigger yield and to be more resistant to pests and disease. Then we take it and blast it with radiation in the microwave. Cars and industry spew chemicals into the atmosphere which rain down on us or damge the ozone layer allowing dangerous levels of solar radiation down to ground level, drugs and medications are readily available, there's the pill and estrogen can be detected in water supplies because we're peeing the hormones out, there are carcinogenic chemicals in every day beauty products, even the foundation you wear on your face, and our homes are regularly sprayed with chemicals. Then you need to consider how far medical science has come. 100 years ago, cancer would have gone undetected until it killed the victim, and unless a post mortem was done (and I doubt they'd go to that trouble for a sick patient), then they'd never know unless the tumour was blatantly obvious. These days, everyone's aware of cancer and the things you need to look out for. We have x-rays and ultrasound for early detection, and means to treat the disease. Maybe the rise in cancer rates isn't much higher than it used to be, maybe it's purely because we can now detect it before it kills. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110821084332AAgQmzU |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1414429016#3_2987599044 | Title: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
Anonymous
when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
6 Answers
What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
Anonymous
Content: Then you need to consider how far medical science has come. 100 years ago, cancer would have gone undetected until it killed the victim, and unless a post mortem was done (and I doubt they'd go to that trouble for a sick patient), then they'd never know unless the tumour was blatantly obvious. These days, everyone's aware of cancer and the things you need to look out for. We have x-rays and ultrasound for early detection, and means to treat the disease. Maybe the rise in cancer rates isn't much higher than it used to be, maybe it's purely because we can now detect it before it kills. I saw a program a while back that showed evidence in a bust that William Shakespeare died from cancer, there was tell tale evidence in his death mask to indicate a tumour in one of his eye sockets. No one mentions the 'C' word when his death is mentioned
...Show more
lo_mcg
Lv 7
10 years ago
The incidence rates of most types of cancer haven't risen significantly in many decades. No, cancer isn't more common in the west, or in the US. Cancer is mainly a disease of ageing - most people diagnosed with it are over 60. In countries where the average life expectancy is well under 60, cancer rates are lower because people die from other causes and don't live long enough to get cancer. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110821084332AAgQmzU |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1414429016#4_2987600985 | Title: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
Anonymous
when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
6 Answers
What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
Anonymous
Content: I saw a program a while back that showed evidence in a bust that William Shakespeare died from cancer, there was tell tale evidence in his death mask to indicate a tumour in one of his eye sockets. No one mentions the 'C' word when his death is mentioned
...Show more
lo_mcg
Lv 7
10 years ago
The incidence rates of most types of cancer haven't risen significantly in many decades. No, cancer isn't more common in the west, or in the US. Cancer is mainly a disease of ageing - most people diagnosed with it are over 60. In countries where the average life expectancy is well under 60, cancer rates are lower because people die from other causes and don't live long enough to get cancer. In the US the average life expectancy is currently in the late 70s. 100 years ago, it was 47. You can see why cancer rates have increased - people are living longer. In Asian countries with a high life expectancy, such as Japan (82.6 years), cancer rates are comparable with those in the US. The Us has higher rates of sometypes of cancer - breast cancer is an example. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110821084332AAgQmzU |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1414429016#5_2987602705 | Title: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
Anonymous
when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
6 Answers
What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
Anonymous
Content: In the US the average life expectancy is currently in the late 70s. 100 years ago, it was 47. You can see why cancer rates have increased - people are living longer. In Asian countries with a high life expectancy, such as Japan (82.6 years), cancer rates are comparable with those in the US. The Us has higher rates of sometypes of cancer - breast cancer is an example. But the rates of stomach cancer in Japan are phenomenal - very, very much higher than in the US or elsewhere in the west. In India (average life expectancy 64.7) has some of the world's highest incidence of cancers of the gall bladder, mouth and lower pharynx. There is no scientific evidence to link soft drinks or indeed any other drinks or food to any type of cancer; the exception being that a diet very high in red and especially processed meats is a known risk factor for colorectal cancers. ...Show more
phyllis
10 years ago
I think your tieing coke to the advent of cancers is disingenuous in that you are singling out one product . . | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110821084332AAgQmzU |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1414429016#6_2987604379 | Title: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
Anonymous
when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
6 Answers
What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
Anonymous
Content: But the rates of stomach cancer in Japan are phenomenal - very, very much higher than in the US or elsewhere in the west. In India (average life expectancy 64.7) has some of the world's highest incidence of cancers of the gall bladder, mouth and lower pharynx. There is no scientific evidence to link soft drinks or indeed any other drinks or food to any type of cancer; the exception being that a diet very high in red and especially processed meats is a known risk factor for colorectal cancers. ...Show more
phyllis
10 years ago
I think your tieing coke to the advent of cancers is disingenuous in that you are singling out one product . . when soda drinks are prevalent from many companies . . including Pepsico. Sodas have been around for over a century now . . albeit it has become a 42oz staple in peoples diets . . but to single out "Coke" is unfortunately pinning the tail on only one Donkey. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110821084332AAgQmzU |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1414429016#9_2987608789 | Title: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
Anonymous
when did Cancer become such a common thing and has it been much more common in the west than in Asia?
6 Answers
What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
Anonymous
Content: we have a monumental challenge in this country . . and that is to continually educate and prod people into wanting a healthy life, while we twist and tweak agribusiness to make healthier and healthier products. Really though . . A lot of the problems we have today are imo opinion due to poisoning our earth and water supply . . we have introduced so many chemicals into the ground through agriculture, and also by chlorinating the water . . we have changed the PH of the land. Industrialization and the use of chemicals in agriculture has poisoned the people . . Coming to a country near you soon
Oh . . and the reason it has hit the West harder than Asia, is due to the fact that Asia is still in a transformation and has been in a bubble of a rural culture for a very long time . . Our worst polluters now are coming out of Asia . . | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110821084332AAgQmzU |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1415505929#0_2990171843 | Title: What was Martin Luther's response to Peasant revolt in 1525 & Why did France support Protestant German princes? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What was Martin Luther's response to Peasant revolt in 1525 & Why did France support Protestant German princes?
What was Martin Luther's response to Peasant revolt in 1525 & Why did France support Protestant German princes?
3 Answers
Anonymous
Content: What was Martin Luther's response to Peasant revolt in 1525 & Why did France support Protestant German princes? | Yahoo Answers
Shahrukhlover5
Lv 5
Shahrukhlover5
asked in Arts & Humanities History · 10 years ago
What was Martin Luther's response to Peasant revolt in 1525 & Why did France support Protestant German princes? France supported the Protestant princes of Germany in order to
A) Spread Protestantism
B) Prevented English influence from increasing in Germany
C) Contain Protestantism east of the Rhine
D) Facilitate the Turkish attack on Habsburg
E) Prevent Charles V from increasing his power
What was Martin Luther's first response to the the demands made by the peasants of their lords in the German peasant revolt of 1525? A) That the nobles should crush the peasants
B) Support the peasants to rebel
C) The peasants and nobles should unite in a crusade against the turks
D) Confiscate the Catholic noble's estate
E) He felt sympathetic toward the peasants
I think the first one is either A or E and the second one might be B or E. I'm not entirely sure though. ...Show more
3 Answers
Relevance
spiffer1
Lv 7
10 years ago
Favorite Answer
There is some bias or weight to the questions as you pose them. You need to check your answers as given in lessons in class and/or through the text (s) mandatory to your course. That said, I would lean toward E in the first one simply because you are there to some extent, and I prefer that over the other choice you have given. The one about the Peasant's rebellion is a little more sticky. Luther did not support the Rebellion, per se, as he believed that there needed to be law and order in the land - even when the authority of those who ruled was in question. The better of the set of responses, as I see it in your list, is, again 'E'. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20111002163926AAWlGw5 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1415505929#1_2990174253 | Title: What was Martin Luther's response to Peasant revolt in 1525 & Why did France support Protestant German princes? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: What was Martin Luther's response to Peasant revolt in 1525 & Why did France support Protestant German princes?
What was Martin Luther's response to Peasant revolt in 1525 & Why did France support Protestant German princes?
3 Answers
Anonymous
Content: You need to check your answers as given in lessons in class and/or through the text (s) mandatory to your course. That said, I would lean toward E in the first one simply because you are there to some extent, and I prefer that over the other choice you have given. The one about the Peasant's rebellion is a little more sticky. Luther did not support the Rebellion, per se, as he believed that there needed to be law and order in the land - even when the authority of those who ruled was in question. The better of the set of responses, as I see it in your list, is, again 'E'. ...Show more
mcswain
Lv 4
4 years ago
"Vieilles pierres", which properly interprets to "previous stones". by ability of which I mean shape which dates back centuries, on occasion to the midsection a while. There are endless cathedrals, castles, church homes, and villages which, thank God, have been under no circumstances torn right down to get replaced by ability of strip-department shops or condos. i myself pass over that. ...Show more
Anonymous
7 years ago
e, and e
Still have questions? | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20111002163926AAWlGw5 |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1416060625#1_2991459977 | Title: How long do you go to school to be a vet? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: How long do you go to school to be a vet?
Anonymous
How long do you go to school to be a vet?
9 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: I will attend that for the 2 years that they offer for it. My question is...if I get my associates degree from SCTI for Vet Asstisting/Vet tech, and that was already 2 years of schooling...would I have to go to college for the same amount of time as someone who DIDN'T do what i'm doing? Someone who just went to college right out of high school? If anyone knows, I would really like any ideas or responses on it because I am really curious about it. ...Show more
9 Answers
Relevance
eri
Lv 7
10 years ago
Favorite Answer
4 years of college and 4 years of vet school. Colleges only accept classes in transfer if they offer the same class, and since 4-year colleges and universities don't offer vet assisting, you can't transfer those credits. You'd be starting over. keasler
Lv 4
4 years ago
How Long Is Vet School
Source (s): https://shrink.im/a8gP1
Anonymous
5 years ago
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/sM8Ht
You need to get a BS, which takes four years. You can major in anything as long as you take the Pre-Vet courses. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20111022200129AAfyz0n |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1416060625#2_2991461458 | Title: How long do you go to school to be a vet? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: How long do you go to school to be a vet?
Anonymous
How long do you go to school to be a vet?
9 Answers
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Content: Colleges only accept classes in transfer if they offer the same class, and since 4-year colleges and universities don't offer vet assisting, you can't transfer those credits. You'd be starting over. keasler
Lv 4
4 years ago
How Long Is Vet School
Source (s): https://shrink.im/a8gP1
Anonymous
5 years ago
For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/sM8Ht
You need to get a BS, which takes four years. You can major in anything as long as you take the Pre-Vet courses. Then you need to go to Vet school for four years to get your doctorate. Vet school is the single hardest graduate program to get into (much harder than medical school). There are only 28 Vet schools in the US. They reserve all but a few slots for students in their state or a state that has a contract with them -- so there are probably only a couple of Vet schools that would consider you. The following link will give you more information on what is required. | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20111022200129AAfyz0n |
msmarco_v2.1_doc_11_1417078398#0_2993874518 | Title: How does the system of checks and balances limit the power of the President (Please Help)? | Yahoo Answers
Headings: How does the system of checks and balances limit the power of the President (Please Help)?
How does the system of checks and balances limit the power of the President (Please Help)?
7 Answers
Anonymous
Content: How does the system of checks and balances limit the power of the President (Please Help)? | Yahoo Answers
Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page. Flatbushbrooklyn
Flatbushbrooklyn
asked in Politics & Government Government · 10 years ago
How does the system of checks and balances limit the power of the President (Please Help)? 7 Answers
Relevance
Mel
Lv 7
10 years ago
Favorite Answer
Limits on the President's power: 1. Cannot start wars unless we are actually attacked or under imminent threat of attack Only Congress can declare war but in recent decades Presidents have gotten around this "CHECK" on their power by calling military activities such things as "Police action" rather than a war. 2. Cannot spend money unless Congress approves this action first: | https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20111201231935AAVJMZE |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.