text
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A dossier by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele containing contacts between Russian officials and members of the Trump campaign started the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election campaign.\n\nQ1: What prompted the Russian interference investigation in the 2016 election campaign In the U.S?\nA1: James Comey said , the \"basis\" for the start of the FBI's Russia investigation was \"information we'd received about a conversation that a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser had with an individual in London about stolen emails that the Russians had that would be harmful to Hillary Clinton.\" Comey added that \"it was weeks or months later that the so-called Steele dossier came to our attention.\"\n\nQ2: Who is James Comey?\nA2: FBI Director at time of April 2016\n\nQ3: Did the Christopher Steele-compiled dossier, which detailed interactions between Russian officials and Trump campaign members, serve as the impetus for the Russia investigation?\nA3: Christopher Steele's raw intelligence reporting did not inform the FBI's decision to initiate its counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The Dossier was received weeks to months later after the investigation had began.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Baltnews.lv news website is an “independent and not controlled by the state media.”\n\nQ1: Who does Whois.net say is the legal owner of Baltnews.lv?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: Are there other articles that say who owns Baltnews.lv?\nA2: The three Russian-language news sites of collectively known as Baltnews have been found to be connected with Russian state-sponsored news agency Rossiya Segodnya, revealed an investigation by publication Re:Baltica on Friday.\n\nQ3: Who is Rossiya Segodnya?\nA3: Rossia Segodnya, Russia's state-run media conglomerate\n\nQ4: Who owns the Baltnews.lv news website?\nA4: No answer could be found.\n\nQ5: What news topics does Baltnews.lv focus on?\nA5: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Found to be connected to russian state media.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Paul Manafort case recovers between forty two and forty six million U.S dollars meaning the cost to taxpayers approaches zero in investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S election.\n\nQ1: What financial gains were made as a direct result of the Paul Manafort case during special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S election?\nA1: Mueller may have paid for his own investigation - because, as part of his plea deal with the special counsel, Manafort agreed to forfeit real estate and cash estimated to be worth between $42 million and $46 million.\n\nQ2: What was the cost of Robert Mueller’s Russian investigation at the time of the claim?\nA2: The nearly two-year special counsel investigation of Russian election interference led by Robert Mueller cost nearly $32 million in total, a new filing shows - the special counsel’s fourth and final expenditures as reported by the Justice Department.\n\nQ3: What was the cost to taxpayers for the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S election?\nA3: According to Jerrold Nadler the cost of the Russian investigation the cost to the US taxpayer approaches zero as a result of the $42 million recovered by Mueller.\n\nQ4: Did the investigation recover any money?\nA4: It recovered real estate and cash estimated to be worth between $42 million and $46 million from a Paul Manafort who agreed to forfeit it.\n\nQ5: Does the recovered money go towards covering the cost of the investigation?\nA5: A Justice Department official said that the money will not go directly to funding the Russia investigation..",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Conflicting evidence from he two questions asked. One mentioned 32 million and another 42million \n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: London has no go areas.\n\nQ1: What is a no-go area?\nA1: A \"no-go area\" or \"no-go zone\" is a neighborhood or other geographic area where some or all outsiders either are physically prevented from entering or can enter only at risk.\nIn the 21st century, the term has most often been used to refer to areas that police or medical workers consider too dangerous to enter without heavy backup.\n\nQ2: Are there any no-go areas in London?\nA2: There are no areas in the UK in which the laws of the UK cannot be enforced.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From the question and answer pairs, everythign is very well explained. It seems that London does not have no-go areas, therefore the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: London has a Muslim mayor.\n\nQ1: Who is Londons Mayor?\nA1: Sadiq Khan\n\nQ2: Is Sadiq khan a Muslim?\nA2: Sadiq Khans twitter - This is London: a Muslim Mayor",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Yes, from the question and answer pairs it does seem like the mayor is a muslim. Therefore, the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: London is now one of the world’s most violent capital cities.\n\nQ1: Which capital cities is the most violent cities in the world?\nA1: Venezuela's capital city of Caracas is and will be, until January of next year at least, considered the world's most violent city... except it isn't.\n\nMexican non-governmental organization (NGO) the Citizen's Council for Public Security and Criminal Justice (Consejo Ciudadano para la Seguridad Pública y la Justicia Penal – CCSPJP) has published its list of the world's 50 Most Violent Cities in 2015, which ranked Caracas number one.Since El Faro's Sala Negra was created five years ago, I have worked as a journalist who tries to understand violence indicators in El Salvador, and I like to compare them with what is happening in other countries in Latin America.\n\nWhile international news agencies and prestigious media outlets elevate this Mexican NGO's list as absolute truth, we at Sala Negra dismissed it as a trusted source some two or three years ago. And we did it for one simple reason: in my opinion, the list's errors and superficiality are far too serious.\n\nQ2: Where are the world’s most violent capital cities ?\nA2: Murder is more common in Latin America than in any other part of the world.\n\nThat's the most striking takeaway from a ranking of the most violent cities compiled earlier this year by Mexico's Citizens' Council for Public Security and Criminal Justice. The ranking doesn't count deaths in war zones or cities with unavailable data.Thirty-four of the 50 worst cities were located in the region, including repeat murder capital of the world — San Pedro Sula, Honduras — which saw 187 homicides per 100,000 inhabitants in 2013 and is getting steadily worse. A full one-third of global homicides occur in Latin America even though the region has just 8% of the world's population, according to United Nations data.\n\nDrug trafficking, gang wars, political instability, corruption, and poverty combine to cause the region's elevated violence.\n\nUS cities also made the list, led by Detroit at No. 24 and New Orleans at No. 26.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From the Q&A it seems that London is never mentioned in any of the lists of the most violent cities. So the claim is refuted. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Police in Gujarat seized weapons from a mosque.\n\nQ1: Has a reverse search been done on the image ?\nA1: Yes this was found March 5 2016 - Stock of lethal weapons found from a hotel/novelty store; in Raikot city- 5 persons arrested.\n\nQ2: Is there any other proof that these weapons were not seized from a mosque?\nA2: According to another check - These weapons were caught in a raid on a hotel on highway in March 2016 in Rajkot, Gujarat",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Although the QAs refute the claim based on an image search, the one link has a malware message, against opening and the other is from text on a fact-checker site. The question: is there any other record of the incident? would have been useful.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Some government buildings in London are operating under sharia law.\n\nQ1: What buildings in the UK operate under Sharia law\nA1: Richmond House and Home to the Department of Health",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: This is correct\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: More than 450 mosques have opened in London.\n\nQ1: How many mosques are open in london?\nA1: 478 (type london in search box on source page)",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: 478 mosques have been opened in London \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: 19th century writer and feminist Margaret Fuller said: Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.\n\nQ1: Who is the saying “Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.” attributed to?\nA1: The saying “Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.” is attributed to Margaret Fuller.\n\nQ2: Who was Margaret-Fuller?\nA2: The leading feminist intellectual of her day, Margaret Fuller has been remembered for her groundbreaking work, Woman in the Nineteenth Century, which recharted the gender roles of nineteenth-century men and women",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Confirmed.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Rep. Ilhan Omar \"voted yes\" to \"provide further funding for the 9/11 First Responders Victims Fund\n\nQ1: Did U.S Rep. Ilhan Omar vote yes to provide further funding to the 9/11 First Responders Victims Fund,\nA1: Yes, because The voting record for the bill to give more funding to the first responders and victims of 9/11 shows the representative Ilhan Omar voted 'YES' to it.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer and source supports the claim and shows that the rep did vote yes. The source is trustworthy.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Abraham Lincoln said \"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we lose our freedoms it will be because we have destroyed ourselves from within.\"\n\nQ1: Did Abraham Lincoln say \"America will never be destroyed from the outside\"?\nA1: No, because Lincoln did not say those words but when talking about the approach of danger, he said \"it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad.\" So the context is similar although the specific words were not his.\n\nQ2: Did Abraham Lincoln say \"If we lose our freedoms it will be because we have destroyed ourselves from within.\" ?\nA2: No, because Lincoln did not say those words but when talking about the approach of danger, he said \"If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher.\" So the context is similar although the specific words were not his.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Since the claim is a quote and those words were not his specific words, then he didn't say them \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Sen. Rand Paul \"voted no.\" to provide further funding for the 9/11 first responders Victims Fund.\n\nQ1: What did Rand Paul do regarding the extension to the 911 victims fund on July 12?\nA1: Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Wednesday blocked an attempt by Democrats to pass an extension of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund.\n\nQ2: How did Rand Paul vote when the extension to the 911 victims fund bill was represented on July 23?\nA2: He voted no\n\nQ3: What was Sen. Rand Paul's vote as regards the 9/11 victims compensation fund\nA3: bill that would compensate first responders and survivors of the September 11 terrorist attacks who have since fallen ill from the toxins and chemicals they inhaled at the site has been blocked in the Senate by Rand Paul and Mike Lee.\n\nQ4: What was his reason for voting against the bill\nA4: ”It has long been my feeling that we need to address our massive debt in the country,” he said. “And therefore any new spending … should be offset by cutting spending that’s less valuable. We need to, at the very least, have this debate.”",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The Q&As clearly show that Paul did vote no for the extension of funding so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Is Donna Shalala correct in saying that Children at Homestead migrant facility \"get 30 minutes over a month to talk to family members. If they were in a prison — a federal prison — they would get 300 minutes.\"\n\nQ1: Which facility is the claim referring to?\nA1: Children housed at a migrant facility in Homestead, Florida.\n\nQ2: What is the faculties policy on telephone time for the children to speak to relatives?\nA2: policy states that children must be provided the opportunity to make a minimum of two telephone calls per week — at 10 minutes each — to family members and/or sponsors living in the United States and abroad\n\nQ3: How much telephone time do the children receive each month according to policy details?\nA3: 2 10 minute phone calls per week adds up to 80 minutes of phone time per month,\n\nQ4: How long do prison inmates get on the phone each month in jail?\nA4: federal Bureau of Prisons policy states that inmates get 300 minutes per month for telephone calls, with an extra 100 minutes per month in November and December. The maximum amount of time for each phone call is 15 minutes.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The 300 minutes for inmates is right but the amount of time the children get is hugely underestimated. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: President Donald Trump’s 2020 campaign is selling plastic straws with the president’s name on them.\n\nQ1: Does Donald Trump's 2020 campaign merchandise include plastic straws?\nA1: Yes, because The 2020 online collection incudes res plastic straws with \"Trump\" in white letters.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is proof of the straws being sold on the official merchandise website for the Trump campaign.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Botswana President was in a Plane Crash\n\nQ1: What happened to the BDF presidential helicopter on 20th July 2019?\nA1: A BDF presidential helicopter carrying His Excellency the President was forced to make an immediate precautionary landing while taxiing at Francistown airport upon arrival from Mathangwane at 1730hrs today 20th July 2019.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The vehicle was a helicopter and it did not crash. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Obama ‘Yanked’ Citizenship Question From Census\n\nQ1: Did Obama remove the Citizenship question from the US Census?\nA1: No, because Obama did not remove the question from the census and over the past 10 years it has been asked more frequently than it was before his two terms in office.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Obama didn't remove citizenship from the census. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: That the Imo state has a debt of over N100 billion\n\nQ1: Does Imo State in Nigeria, have Over N100 billion debt, in the year 2018 ?\nA1: Ihedioha said the state is faced with over N100 billion naira debt with “nothing to show for it.”\n\nAlready, Imo State has received over 30 billion Naira worth of Garnishee Orders secured against it by contractors.\nBut the Imo State governor said the contracts were fraudulently awarded by Okorocha’s government.\n\n“I must inform you in this regard that, so far we have received over 30 billion Naira worth of Garnishee Orders arising from several ill-conceived and fraudulent contractual agreements deliberately consummated by the past administration, to destroy the future of the State and its teeming population by fettering the State in a humongous debt trap,” Ihedioha said.\n\nSimilar comments about Okorocha’s eight years as Imo state governor were made a day before Ihedioha’s statement by Chidi Odinkalu, a former chairman of Nigeria’s National Human Rights Commission.\n\nQ2: What was the domestic and external debts of Imo State, in 2018 ?\nA2: Provisional\nS/No States and FGN Multilateral Bilateral (AFD) Bilateral (CHINA EXIM BANK, Commercial Total\nJICA, INDIA, KFW\nUSD USD USD\nEurobonds & Diaspora Bonds\nUSD USD\n1 Abia 100,217,589.59 - - - 100,217,589.59\n2 Adamawa 51,360,541.54 6,500,000.00 - - 57,860,541.54\n3 Akwa Ibom 48,385,866.53 - - - 48,385,866.53\n4 Anambra 107,438,517.03 - - - 107,438,517.03\n5 Bauchi 134,907,612.92 - - - 134,907,612.92\n6 Bayelsa 57,256,211.04 - - - 57,256,211.04\n7 Benue 34,750,363.40 - - - 34,750,363.40\n8 Borno 22,292,486.47 - - - 22,292,486.47\n9 Cross River 149,896,061.81 43,900,000.00 - - 193,796,061.81\n10 Delta 63,825,838.81 - - - 63,825,838.81\n11 Ebonyi 67,901,721.07 - - - 67,901,721.07\n12 Edo 279,029,896.21 - - - 279,029,896.21\n13 Ekiti 97,994,770.66 - - - 97,994,770.66\n14 Enugu 121,452,029.92 6,500,000.00 - - 127,952,029.92\n15 Gombe 38,500,292.18 - - - 38,500,292.18\n16 Imo 61,277,993.68 - - - 61,277,993.68\n17 Jigawa 32,800,038.17 - - - 32,800,038.17\n18 Kaduna 232,965,533.73 - - - 232,965,533.73\n19 Kano 65,047,427.46 - - - 65,047,427.46\n20 Katsina 64,757,964.40 - - - 64,757,964.40\n21 Kebbi 46,759,780.42 - - - 46,759,780.42\n22 Kogi 32,371,905.62 - - - 32,371,905.62\n23 Kwara 49,871,457.19 - - 49,871,457.19\n24 Lagos 1,307,809,937.86 143,830,000.00 - - 1,451,639,937.86\n25 Nassarawa 61,495,066.44 - - - 61,495,066.44\n26 Niger 49,247,995.99 6,500,000.00 - - 55,747,995.99\n27 Ogun 100,388,666.18 5,000,000.00 - - 105,388,666.18\n28 Ondo 81,417,458.58 - - - 81,417,458.58\n29 Osun 89,321,077.28 12,245,989.00 - - 101,567,066.28\n30 Oyo 106,334,516.11 - - - 106,334,516.11\n31 Plateau 29,696,386.15 - - - 29,696,386.15\n32 Rivers 79,520,400.99 - - - 79,520,400.99\n33 Sokoto 40,225,935.91 - - - 40,225,935.91\n34 Taraba 22,113,312.20 - - - 22,113,312.20\n35 Yobe 28,496,975.62 - - - 28,496,975.62\n36 Zamfara 34,244,939.78 - - - 34,244,939.78\n37 FCT 32,833,430.20 - - - 32,833,430.20\nSub-Total State & FCT 4,024,207,999.14 224,475,989.00 - - 4,248,683,988.14\nFGN 6,859,488,672.86 50,500,000.00 2,124,768,264.0",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The 2nd answer and source shows that the state has a debt of over 100 billion.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Bombardier to open rail car assembly plant in the USA due to Trump’s reduced corporate tax rate.\n\nQ1: Is Bombardier opening a new plant in California\nA1: Bombardier is set to open a rail car assembly site in Pittsburg, California, to support its ongoing rail projects in the US.\n\nThe official announcement was made by Bombardier Transportation Americas Division president Elliot G (Lee) Sander.\n\nQ2: Why is Bombardier opening a plant in California\nA2: In addition to creating and retaining local jobs in Pittsburg, California, the move will enable the New York site to prepare for the upcoming East Coast orders",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Seems the plant was opened for assembly not due to reduced ta rate. Therefore the claim is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: British Airways is giving free tickets to 5,000 people to celebrate its 50th anniversary.\n\nQ1: What is the date of the claim?\nA1: The date of the claim is 18/07/2019\n\nQ2: When was British Airways founded?\nA2: The airline as we know it today emerged from several major acquisitions and mergers that took place from the 1920s to the 1970s.\n\nQ3: How did British Airways mark its centenary in 2019?\nA3: February 01, 2019\n\nBritish Airways is marking its centenary with a love letter to Britain delivered by a cast including Olivia Colman, Anthony Joshua, Gary Oldman and Riz Ahmed.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems that BA held a concert rather than gave out free tickets. Therefore, the claim is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Winston Churchill said “You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.”\n\nQ1: Did Winston Churchill say “You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.”?\nA1: There's no evidence that he said this.\n\nQ2: Is anyone else credited with this quote?\nA2: Victor Hugo\n\nQ3: What is the full quote for this claim?\nA3: “You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.”\n\nQ4: Where does the quote, \"You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life,\" originate from?\nA4: ...this thought was originally expressed by the French author Victor Hugo in Villemain (1845), as follows: You have enemies? Why, it is the story of every man who has done a great deed or created a new idea. It is the cloud which thunders around everything that shines. Fame must have enemies, as light must have gnats. Do not bother yourself about it; disdain. Keep your mind serene as you keep your life clear. Villemain is a brief segment taken from Hugo's Choses Vues (Things Seen), a running journal Hugo kept of events he witnessed. The original French versions of these journals were published after Hugo's death.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Winston Churchill is found not to have said this, it's a quote taken from French author Victor Hugo.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Trump claims his deregulatory actions are saving American households $3,000 a year.\n\nQ1: Where did Trump get the $3,000 a year saving figure from?\nA1: The Economic Effects of Federal Deregulation since January 2017: An \nInterim Report by The Council of Economic Advisers\nJune 2019\n\nQ2: What does the report 'The Economic Effects of Federal Deregulation since January 2017: An Interim Report' say about the $3,000 saving as a result of deregulations?\nA2: The Council of Economic \nAdvisers (CEA) estimates that after 5 to 10 years, this new approach to Federal regulation will \nhave raised real incomes by $3,100 per household per year.\n\nQ3: Are the many figures used in the report reliable?\nA3: The figures are estimates and have been refuted by numerous sources such as the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) which argued that the 'Stream Protection Rule' had less effect than the CEA argued it did.\n\nQ4: Does the $3100 take some time before it is realized\nA4: The Council of Economic\nAdvisers (CEA) estimates that after 5 to 10 years, this new approach to Federal regulation will\nhave raised real incomes by $3,100 per household per year.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: as the data which was used to decide the 3000 a year was refuted by several places. \n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: If you’re a black woman in America today — in New York City, you’re 12 times more likely to die in childbirth, four times more likely nationwide.\n\nQ1: How many US women die during childbirth each year?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: What is the US maternal mortality rate per year?\nA2: Approximately 700 women across the United States (U.S.) die each year as a result of pregnancy or\npregnancy-related complications\n\nQ3: How many US black women experience US maternal deaths compared to white women?\nA3: Non-Hispanic black women experience maternal deaths at a rate three\nto four times that of non-Hispanic white women.\n\nQ4: How many black women in NYC experience maternal deaths compared to white women?\nA4: Black, non-Hispanic women [in NYC] were 12 times more likely than White, non-Hispanic\nwomen to die from pregnancy-related causes between 2006 and 2010. T",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From the Q&A it seems that the statistic of black women being 12 times more likely to die in childbirth in the claim is correct. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: French writer and philosopher Voltaire once said, “I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”\n\nQ1: Is French writer and philosopher Voltaire quoted as saying “I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”?\nA1: There is no record of him saying this in his written works.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer and source say there is no evidence of the quote being said so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Judge in Epstein Case Found Dead of Apparent Suicide\n\nQ1: What was Epstein Charged for ?\nA1: Epstein was arrested last Saturday on federal charges of conspiracy and sex trafficking in minors and has pleaded not guilty. The 66-year-old fund manager and globe-trotting socialite, accused of molesting girls as young as 14 from 2002 to 2005, could spend the rest of his life in prison if convicted.\n\nQ2: When was Jeffrey Epstein arrested?\nA2: Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy, politically connected Florida financier, was arrested in New York on Saturday evening on sex trafficking charges, sources tell NBC 4 New York. \n\nEpstein was expected to appear in federal court in Manhattan on Monday, two law enforcement officials said on a condition of anonymity. \n\nThe Daily Beast first reported news of the arrest. \n\nHe will face federal charges for incidents between 2002-2005, three senior law enforcement sources told NBC News. He is expected to appear Monday in Manhattan federal court, three law enforcement officials told The Associated Press.\n\nA law enforcement official said Epstein would be charged with trafficking and conspiracy to traffic minors for sex. \n\nA senior official briefed on the case said there were dozens of alleged underaged victims, some as young as 14. \n\nEpstein allegedly paid minors cash for massages and then sex acts, the source said. He would then pay those alleged victims even more to bring him their friends or others who he would also allegedly pay for sex acts.\n\nQ3: What website did the claim originate on?\nA3: Potatriots Unite\n\nQ4: What do Potatriots Unite describe their news website as?\nA4: A network of parody, satire, and tomfoolery, satire: Junk News\n\nQ5: Are the stories on this website true?\nA5: No, because The stories are described as satire: Junk News by the site themselves.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim from Potatriots Unite is that it is a network of parody, satire, and tomfoolery: junk news. Hence, the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Ukraine’s language law prohibits Russian from being spoken by doctors and teachers.\n\nQ1: Can a person in Ukraine who needs medical attention ask to communicate in Russian?\nA1: At the request of a person seeking medical assistance or medical care, one’s personal treatment may also be provided in a language acceptable to the parties. In other words, in a case when a patient requests the doctor to conduct the reception in Russian and a doctor has no objections, a doctor may ensure the reception in Russian.\n\nQ2: Does the law stop you from speaking other languages in Ukraines educational institutions?\nA2: As far as the language of education is concerned, the law does not make any changes.\n\nQ3: Does a law stop you from speaking other languages in any of Ukraine's institutions or Ukraine itself?\nA3: Article 10 says that the “state language in Ukraine is Ukrainian”. But that same article states that “the free development, use and defence of Russian and other languages of national minorities is guaranteed in Ukraine”.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: although the official language is Ukrainian, the law states the the use of other languages, including russian, is allowed and guaranteed in the Ukraine. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: On 13 June 2019 Kenya’s finance minister Henry Rotich claimed that Kenya has been ranked 85th globally in e-commerce uptake.\n\nQ1: Who is ranked 85th globally according to UN Conference on trade and development?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: Where did Kenya rank globally in 2018?\nA2: No answer could be found. No links worked and no answer found in search.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No evidence could be found. Hence, there is not enough evidence.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: President Muhammadu Buhari has no house in Abuja, Nigeria.\n\nQ1: When did the society find out about President Buhari has houses in Abuja?\nA1: On the 3rd of september 2015\n\nQ2: Does President Muhammadu Buhari own a house in Abuja, Nigeria?\nA2: President Muhammadu Buhari owns the sprawling Asokoro lakeside mansion located at number 9, Udo Udoma Street, Asokoro, Abuja, BREAKING TIMES can authoritatively report.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: QA 2 provides news article confirming Buhari owns a house in Abuja.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Atiku Abubakar chaired a council that “paid off Nigeria's entire debt” in 2006.\n\nQ1: Were all of Nigeria's debt paid off in 2006/2007?\nA1: No, because Nigeria still had 3.54 billion in debt that year.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim is not true, Nigeria still has huge debt and it has not been paid off. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and His Team Cleared Nigeria’s Entire Debt In 2006.\n\nQ1: Did former Vice President Atiku Abubakar clear Nigeria's entire debt in 2006?\nA1: No, because Nigeria was still in debt.\n\nQ2: How much debt was owed by Nigeria in 2006?\nA2: According to the historical data compiled by BusinessDay, Nigeria owed a total of N2.2 trillion, comprising N1.75 trillion in domestic debt and $3.54 billion payable to external sources.\n\nQ3: Did Nigeria's clear all its debt in 2006?\nA3: No, because Figures show it had 2.20ngn trillion total debt in 2006.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Figures show it had 2.20ngn trillion total debt in 2006.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US senator Elizabeth Warren said, \"The law says that mental health must be treated the same as physical health,\" but coverage by health insurers is unequal.\n\nQ1: Is treatment of mental health problems coverage equal to that of physical treatments in the US?\nA1: No, because Health professionals treat physical problems much more efficiently than mental health problems.\n\nQ2: What's the US law stating that the insurance cover for mental health to be equal to that for physical health?\nA2: A law passed in 2008, the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (also known as the mental health parity law or federal parity law) requires coverage of services for mental health, behavioral health and substance-use disorders to be comparable to physical health coverage.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The law was passed in 2008 which states that physical and mental health should be treated the same but health professionals do treat the conditions differently and physical health is dealt with more efficiently.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: George Washington said, \"It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible.\"\n\nQ1: Did George Washington say, \"It is impossible to rightly govern a nation without God and the Bible\"?\nA1: The quote is frequently misattributed to Washington, particularly in regards to his farewell address of 1796. The origin of the misquote is, perhaps, a mention of a similar statement in a biography of Washington first published in 1835. However, the quote that appeared in the biography has never been proven to have come from Washington.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No evidence shows that this claim is correct.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Poltergeist child star Heather O'Rourke was killed by a Hollywood pedophile ring\n\nQ1: Which online news site published the claim?\nA1: NewsPunch (formerly YourNewsWire)\n\nQ2: Are Newspunch a fake news site?\nA2: YourNewsWire (styled as YourNewsWire.com[1]) is an Los Angeles-based clickbait fake news website known for disseminating conspiracy theories and misleading information, contrary to its claimed motto (\"News. Truth. Unfiltered\").[1]\n\nQ3: How did Heather O'Rourke pass away?\nA3: Heather died of cardiac-pulmonary arrest and septic shock, the result of an undetected intestinal blockage.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: QA pairs state actual cause of death and that the story is on a known fake news website.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: kenya's forestry sector contributes 3.6% of the national gross domestic product.\n\nQ1: Does the forestry sector in Kenya contributes 3.6% of GDP by 2019 ?\nA1: The FAO report estimated that the formal forestry sector made up 1.2% of GDP in 2011, from wages, profits and timber. When the informal sector such as woodfuel and charcoal was counted, forestry’s contribution rose to 3% – still lower than the taskforce’s estimate of 3.6%.\nThe report said the official figure, which put forestry’s GDP contribution at 1.1%, was a “gross underestimate”. This was by “at least 2.5%, which puts the estimate of its annual contribution to GDP to around 3.6%”.But their was no proof of the same. Hence, this claim is unproven.\n\nQ2: Are 60% of the national energy requirements in Kenya are from wood fuel by 2019 ?\nA2: But the Energy Regulatory Commission says biomass, including wood fuel, makes up 70% of Kenya’s energy supply. The FAO’s 2014 State of the World’s Forests puts this at 68%.This claim is true.\n\nQ3: What was the estimated GDP amount contributed to forestry in 2018?\nA3: An estimated 1.3% contributed to forestry and logging in 2018.\n\nQ4: What was the estimated GDP amount contributed to forestry in 2019?\nA4: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The source indicted that there was no sufficient evidence to prove that Kenya's forestry sector contributes 3.6% of the national gross domestic product. \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Ireland's national debt was 856 Billion Euros in 2019.\n\nQ1: How much was Ireland's public debt in 2019?\nA1: 206 Billion Euros",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Confirmed via source through a pdf link on page. (maybe source should link direct to pdf? )\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Obama administration in the USA has cut the citizenship question from the US census in 2010.\n\nQ1: Where does the census bureau enquire about citizenship?\nA1: Citizenship is enquired about in the ACS.\n\nQ2: When did the Census Bureau switch this question to the ACS?\nA2: 2005\n\n(The ACS and the reengineering of the decennial census will affect data users and the public for\ndecades to come. Beginning with the survey’s full implementation in 2005, the ACS replaced the\ncensus long-form questionnaire)\n\nQ3: When did Obama take office ?\nA3: In office\nJanuary 20, 2009 – January 20, 2017",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The question was changed prior to the Obama Administration. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Spain wants money from the UK to cover its debts.\n\nQ1: How much was Spain's national debt in 2019?\nA1: In 2019 Spain public debt was 1,369,666 million dollars, has increased 58,592 million since 2018.\n\nQ2: Has Spain asked the UK for money to help cover their national debt?\nA2: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No evidence is provided that supports this claim.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The ACS (American Community Survey) asks about citizenship in the US census every fifth year.\n\nQ1: How often does the ACS go out to households?\nA1: Every year, the U.S. Census Bureau contacts over 3.5 million households across the country to participate in the American Community Survey\n\nQ2: Do they ask questions about citizenship?\nA2: We ask questions about a person’s place of birth, citizenship, and year of entry into the United States to create data about citizens, noncitizens, and the foreign-born population.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: They are sent annually not every 5 years.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Greece owes the EU €367 billion\n\nQ1: When was the claim made\nA1: 09/07/2019\n\nQ2: How much was Greece owing in 2019\nA2: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No Debt data provided in QA Pairs to support or refute the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Greece has said it will collapse when we leave the EU.\n\nQ1: what is the world debt of greece?\nA1: Greece’s national debt is worth €337 billion.\n\nQ2: is greece the country with the most dept\nA2: countries like Spain and Italy have higher depts",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The Q&A Pairs did not provide enough evidence for this claim. \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: If the UK leaves the EU, France and Germany’s economies will collapse.\n\nQ1: What will happen to European union countries if the UK leaves?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: What will happen to the European union if the UK leaves?\nA2: When the United Kingdom leaves the European Union, higher barriers to trade, capital flows, and labor mobility will affect output and jobs not only in the UK but also in the remaining 27 EU member states. Since Brexit means both parties will withdraw from a frictionless economic relationship, there will be costs on both sides.\n\nQ3: What trade and goods are are accounted by the UK in EU trading?\nA3: The UK is among the EU 27’s largest trading partners, accounting for about 13 percent of its trade in goods and services.\n\nQ4: What will be the detrimental economic effects on Germany if the UK leaves the EU?\nA4: No answer could be found.\n\nQ5: What will be the detrimental economic effects on France if the UK leaves the EU?\nA5: No answer could be found.\n\nQ6: Why does the claim suggest that the UK leaving the EU would collapse the economies of Germany & France?\nA6: the UK no longer paying into the EU budget, France and Germany will have to shoulder more of the cost since the UK is one of the major contributors to the EU budget.\n\nQ7: How will the EU fill the budget deficit once the UK leaves the EU?\nA7: the EU is preparing a budget for 2021-2027 that doesn’t include the UK. The EU acknowledges that Brexit will leave a “sizeable gap” in the budget, but says this will be managed through increased contributions and decreased spending in some areas.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is no evidence to state that France and Germany's economies will collapse so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Food stamp participation in America hits 10 year low.\n\nQ1: What is the US food stamp?\nA1: SNAP benefits (formerly food stamps)\nThe Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) can help you expand your healthy food budget and explore opportunities to support your wellbeing and education and employment goals.\n\nQ2: Did participation in SNAP hit a 10 year low in 2019?\nA2: In 2009 average participation was 33,490. In 2019 it was 35,702. The years in between were higher than 33,490.\n\nQ3: Did the US population grow between 2009 and 2019?\nA3: Yes, because Dec 2009 = 308,495,000\nDec 2019 = 337,345,000\n\nQ4: Using the 2009 numbers of 33,490 vs 308,495,000 people, what percent of people used food stamps?\nA4: 0.0108559296%\n\nQ5: Using the 2019 numbers of 35,702 vs 337,345,000 people, what percent of people used food stamps\nA5: 0.0105832308%\n\nQ6: Which number is lower:\n\n0.0108559296% (2009)\nor\n0.0105832308% (2019)\nA6: 0.0105832308% (2019)",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: True\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Italy owes 1 Trillion.\n\nQ1: what is the value of the european union's debt?\nA1: Greece’s national debt is worth €337 billion.\n\nQ2: According to Eurostat, how much debt does Italy have/owe?\nA2: 2.4 trillion Euros",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&A 2 shows that Italy owes 2.4 trillion in debt as a country, which is not the 1 trillion in the claim\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said \"I’m speaking with myself, number one, because I have a very good brain and I’ve said lots of things.\"\n\nQ1: When was the claim made\nA1: 09/07/2019\n\nQ2: Is the claim from a verifiable source\nA2: No, because There is no claim source in the metadata\n\nQ3: Who said, \"I’m speaking with myself, number one, because I have a very good brain and I’ve said lots of things\"?\nA3: Donald Trump said this on MSNBC’s \"Morning Joe.\" When asked who he consistently talks with about foreign policy, Trump responded, \"I’m speaking with myself, number one, because I have a very good brain and I’ve said a lot of things.\"",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez did not say these words, rather it was credited to Donald Trump on MSNBC’s \"Morning Joe.\"\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: 99.5 per cent of the Australian population is housed, about half a per cent of the population don't have a permanent roof over their head.\n\nQ1: What is the population of Australia?\nA1: 23.34 million (2016 consensus)\n\nQ2: How many homeless people are there in Australia?\nA2: 116,400 (2016 consensus)\n\nQ3: where is the data showing number of homelessness coming from\nA3: the data comes from ABS's census of population and housing",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From calculating the figures given in the Q&As the claim is correct. So the claim is supported. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Microwave Ovens Are Banned In Japan\n\nQ1: Has Japan banned Microwave ovens?\nA1: The former Soviet Union may have banned micro- wave ovens for a short period, but no countries ban them today.\n\nQ2: Is there any plans to ban microwave ovens in Japan?\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: Are microwave ovens harmful to humans?\nA3: Microwave ovens produce electromagnetic radiation.\n\nYou may find this concerning due to radiation’s negative connotations. However, this is not the type of radiation associated with atomic bombs and nuclear disasters.\n\nMicrowave ovens produce non-ionizing radiation, which is like the radiation from your cell phone — though much stronger.\n\nKeep in mind that light is also electromagnetic radiation, so clearly not all radiation is bad.\n\nMicrowave ovens have metal shields and metal screens over the window that prevent the radiation from leaving the oven, so there shouldn’t be any risk of harm.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No evidence suggests this. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: British prime minister Winston Churchill once said, \"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty\"\n\nQ1: When did Churchill say: \"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty\"\nA1: There is no record of Churchill ever saying this.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is no record of the quote being made by Winston Churchill\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The State of Florida passed a law that makes nudity legal at all public beaches.\n\nQ1: What is the current law around nudity in Florida?\nA1: Florida indecent exposure laws prohibit the display, exhibition, or exposure of an individual's sexual organs in a public place or while in public view. To prosecute a defendant for indecent exposure, the state prosecutor must establish the defendant's unlawful intent, the act of exposure, and the location of the act.\n\nQ2: Is there evidence of this legislation changing?\nA2: No, because The original law stands, except for on nudist beaches",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Seems that you cannot b nude at a public beach in Florida. Therefore, the claim is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: That Joel Osteen's Ministries charge people for prayers via a \"prayer request account.\n\nQ1: Where was this claim published?\nA1: Facebook - the account has since been deleted.\n\nQ2: Have Joel Osteen Ministries addressed this claim?\nA2: Yes, because Lakewood Church has been warning people about a Facebook account posing as \"Joel Osteen Ministries,\" which has been asking people for donations up to $50 to activate prayer request accounts.\nA church spokesperson said she didn't know where the post originated. She said the Lakewood social media team saw hundreds of people receiving the fake messages.\n\nThe church quickly notified people that that they do not, in fact, charge for prayer requests.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There was a fake Facebook account posing as Joel Osteen Ministries that was fraudulently asking for money\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: No European country engages in electronic voting\n\nQ1: Is there a country in Europe that uses electronic voting for their elections\nA1: Estonia has been using electronic voting for their elections since 2005\n\nQ2: Are there other countries in Europe that have experimented with electronic voting\nA2: Norway tested i-voting in parliamentary elections in 2011 and 2013, but decided to discontinue online voting due to political disagreement and voters' concerns.\n\nAnd France previously allowed citizens living abroad to cast their vote online in legislative elections, but has disallowed this for the upcoming June legislative elections amid cyber-security concerns.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Estonia is in Europe and does use electronic voting.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Female soccer players in the U.S are earning less money than male players.\n\nQ1: How much does the U.S Female soccer players earn compared to USMNT?\nA1: In March, every member of the U.S. women's team filed a lawsuit against the soccer federation for gender discrimination. It stipulates that currently, if each team played and won 20 exhibition games in a year, “female WNT players would earn a maximum of $99,000 or $4,950 per game, while similarly situated male MNT players would earn an average of $263,320 or $13,166 per game.\" So the team is seeking equal treatment and pay, because as it stands, the women reportedly 38% of what their male counterparts make. As far as individual players' incomes, they can vary markedly based on sponsorships and star power. Goalie Ashlyn Harris told The New York Times that she expects to make “between $300,000 and $400,000” this year, and another player estimated $167,500. Alex Morgan is estimated to earn $1 million annually. But for players without endorsement deals and less celebrity status, the numbers can be a lot lower.Prior to the U.S. team's most recent landslide victory, Democratic presidential candidates Kirsten Gillibrand, Kamala Harris, and Elizabeth Warren have long taken up the cause of equal pay in sports. The Paycheck Fairness Act, passed by House Democrats, would protect against gender discrimination, though it is currently stalled in the Senate. Notably, when asked by a reporter earlier this week if the women's team should be paid the same as the men, President Trump declined to respond.\n\nQ2: How much is Women's World Cup 2019 Prize Money ?\nA2: The 2019 World Cup championship team will win $4 million, and the total prize money awarded to all teams during this summer's World Cup is roughly $30 million. Both figures are double what the women's World Cup paid out to teams during the 2015 tournament in Canada. But let's compare those figures with the men's World Cup: In 2018, World Cup champion France was awarded $38 million by FIFA for winning the tournament, which is more than what all of the 2019 women's World Cup teams get combined. The prize money overall for the men's 2018 World Cup in Russia came to a total of $400 million, or over 13 times more than the FIFA prize money for the women this summer. What's more, members of the USA women's team earned bonuses of $90,000 for reaching the quarterfinals in the 2019 World Cup. If the U.S. men's team had reached the same point in last year's World Cup, they would have gotten bonuses of $550,000. This is the case even though the U.S. women's team outearns the men's team in revenues. The main argument for why the men's World Cup prize money totals are so much bigger than the women's counterpart is that men's soccer has far more interest among fans — and far higher revenues overall around the globe. The women's World Cup 2015 in Canada reportedly brought in $73 million in revenues, including some $17 million in TV ads just in the U.S. Those are actually tiny numbers compared to the $6 billion in revenues FIFA raked in during the 2018 men's World Cup in Russia.\n\nQ3: How Much Money U.S. Women's National Team Players Make ?\nA3: The U.S. women's national team fought for a raise, and got one in 2017, when players began receiving an undisclosed pay increase. Before then, members of the U.S. national team were paid \"a maximum of $4,950 per 'friendly,' or non-tournament, game that they won, while men’s national-team players earned an average of $13,166 for the same thing,\" according to The Atlantic. Yet even after the pay raise, America's female national team still makes significantly less than their male equivalents. This is the case even though the women have won three World Cups and four Olympic gold medals over the past two decades, compared to zero and zero for the U.S. men's team. Earlier this year, the U.S. women's team filed a lawsuit against U.S. Soccer, seeking better pay for women, who reportedly earn 38% of what their male counterparts make. Among other arguments U.S. Soccer attorneys have made to explain the gender pay differences are that the men's and women's national teams \"have separate collective bargaining agreements; and have separate budgets that take into account the different revenue that the teams generate.\" While U.S. Soccer fights the women's national team lawsuit, sponsors have stepped up in the battle over equal pay. In early April, USWNT sponsor LUNA Bar made a donation that will give each member of the women's team $31,250 — which is the difference between the World Cup bonuses for America's men's and women's teams. Meanwhile, U.S. Soccer sponsor Visa says that under the terms of a new five-year deal more than 50% of its funding will go to the women's team, rather than a 50-50 split between men and women like in the past. And soccer branding titan Adidas says that it will pay equal bonuses to all of its sponsored players, male and female alike, for winning the World Cup. So how much money could U.S. women's national team players make if they win the World Cup 2019? It's difficult\n\nQ4: Are the female soccer players in the U.S are earning less money than male players ?\nA4: Sometimes. When the female players have appeared to make about the same or more money, they’ve had to turn in consistently outstanding performances on the world stage. Even with those feats, earning the same amount as the men’s soccer players was near-impossible under the previous collective-bargaining agreement.\n\nThe new agreement has provisions that may reduce the difference in bonuses for friendly games and tournaments, but there is — without question and for whatever reasons — still a massive gap between men’s and women’s World Cup bonuses. Hence, since it is true that the women soccer players are paid less as they bring lesser revenue.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&A 1 explains that yes overall women soccer players are paid less as they bring lesser revenue. which is in agreement with the claims point.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Metropolitan police officers took part in the pride parade.\n\nQ1: Did any on-duty metropolitan police offers take part in London's pride celebrations\nA1: 150 officers and\nstaff from the Met took part in the parade",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: the claim is supported by the question-answer pair and source\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US president Joe Biden didn’t support any mandatory minimum prison sentences.\n\nQ1: Does Joe Biden support mandatory minimum prison sentences for criminals.\nA1: In a 1993 symposium by the US Sentencing Commission, Joe Biden said 'I think we’ve had all the mandatory minimums that we need. We don’t need the ones that we have'",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The quote suggests that Biden is against mandatory minimum prison sentences.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In the 1980s and 1990s violent crime was out of control.\n\nQ1: Did the violent crime rate in the U.S increase during the 1980s and 1990s on previous and following decades?\nA1: Yes, because The graph in the attached url shows a large rise in violent crime at the start of the 80s and through the 90s, before starting to decline.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer and the graph in the source do show that violent crime did increase in those decades so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The crime bill was opposed by Republicans.\n\nQ1: what is the crime bill?\nA1: The 1994 crime bill, which Biden, as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, largely wrote and shepherded through the legislative process. The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 received bipartisan support at the time but has been criticized for some of its provisions, such as mandatory minimum sentencing, and its impact on mass incarceration. (When we looked at claims in 2016 from both sides on the law’s role in mass incarceration, we found the trend of increasing imprisonment began well before 1994, but experts told us the 1994 law exacerbated the issue.)\n\nQ2: Did the republicans vote against the crime bill?\nA2: McConnell, now the Senate majority leader, did vote against the final version of the bill in August 1994, as did all but eight Republican senators. However, months earlier, in November 1993, the original bill had garnered near universal support in the Senate, with McConnell on the “yes” ledger.\n\nQ3: Why did they switch their vote?\nA3: they objected to additional spending in the final bill, calling it “pork.” McConnell told CNN on Aug. 15, 1994, 10 days before the final Senate vote: “The Kentucky Fraternal Order of Police this weekend came out against this crime bill. … [B]ecause they thought it was porked up, that it was going to be a bill basically about social workers and not police officers.”",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: All but eight Republicans rejected the bill\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Biden's crime bill included Violence Against Women Act, It also included strengthening the Brady Bill on background checks, eliminated assault weapons.\n\nQ1: What are the components of the Biden Violent Crime Bill\nA1: To name a few, it included bans on assault weapons, increased funding to ensure the Brady bill still runs properly and grant program to support police and prosecutor efforts and\nvictims services in cases involving sexual violence or domestic\nabuse, and for other programs which strengthen enforcement and\nprovide services to victims in such cases",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Increased funding of the bill is an effort to strengthen it.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The UK is the best country for education in 2019.\n\nQ1: Which country had the best educational system in 2019\nA1: According to the Ranking of National Higher\nEducation Systems 2019 article, the US had the best educational system in 2019 followed by Switzerland then the UK",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Ranked 3rd based on Answer provided.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Joe Biden wrote into the 1994 Crime Bill that anyone arrested for for drug related crimes, who are suffering from drug addictions, should be diverted into drug courts.\n\nQ1: Did the 1994 Crime Bill provide funding to divert drug users to a different court for sentencing?\nA1: Yes, because The 1994 law provided $1 billion for drug courts over six years\n\nQ2: Was Biden involved in making the 1994 crime bill?\nA2: Yes, because Biden, as chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, wrote and brought through The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994\n\nQ3: Did the 1994 law say addicts should go to a separate court and not to prison system?\nA3: a March 2018 CRS report explains. “Many drug courts offer a treatment and social service alternative for those who otherwise may have faced traditional criminal sanctions for their offenses. In some drug courts, individuals that have been arrested are diverted from local courts into special judge-involved programs; these courts are often viewed as ‘second chance’ courts. Other drug court programs offer reentry assistance after an offender has served his or her sentence.”",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Correct\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Republicans didn’t like the fact that democrats removed mandatory minimums for first-time offenders.\n\nQ1: What legislation is being discussed?\nA1: The final legislation included a so-called “safety valve” provision that limited the use of mandatory minimum federal sentences for some drug offenses. A defendant could qualify to be exempt from those mandatory sentences if he or she met certain criteria, including: that the defendant didn’t use violence or possess a gun or dangerous weapon during the act, no one was killed or seriously injured, and the defendant wasn’t “an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of others in the offense.”\n\nQ2: What is the three strikes rule?\nA2: Mandatory life imprisonment without possibility of parole for Federal\noffenders with three or more convictions for serious violent felonies or\ndrug trafficking crimes.\n\nQ3: What this supported by Biden?\nA3: Biden did not back the three strikes provision, but he did back a Republican amendment that was added to the Senate legislation. Biden is on record at the time as saying he supported a three-strikes provision for “serious [violent] felonies against a person,” but he was against including nonviolent offenses and expressed concern that minor crimes could get swept up in the measure.\n\nQ4: Was this supported by Biden?\nA4: Biden did not back the three strikes provision, but he did back a Republican amendment that was added to the Senate legislation. Biden is on record at the time as saying he supported a three-strikes provision for “serious [violent] felonies against a person,” but he was against including nonviolent offenses and expressed concern that minor crimes could get swept up in the measure.\n\nQ5: What was the Republicans stance on the removal of mandatory minimums for first-time offenders by the democrats?\nA5: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: None of the evidence found comes to a conclusion on what the Republicans think about the Democrats removing the policy of mandatory minimums, it's safe to assume the Republicans did not agree with its removal by the Democracts but the QA didnt manage to discover any evidence backing that assumption.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Biden didn’t support more money to build state prisons.\n\nQ1: Was money assigned for state prison construction?\nA1: Biden did support $6 billion in funding for state prison construction, but not the $10 billion that was part of the final bill. His campaign says the $4 billion difference is what he means when he says he “didn’t support more money to build state prisons.”",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: QA shows Biden supported $6 billion but not $10 billion of funding to build state prisons. Claim does not define what ‘more’ is, but clear that Biden supported at least some funding of state prison construction.\nNB QA source links to a fact checking article.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In 2017, The US had more arrests for marijuana possession than for all other violent crimes combined.\n\nQ1: what is the prison rate for marijuana possession in america?\nA1: As for Booker’s claim, according to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) database, law enforcement nationwide made an estimated 518,617 arrests for violent crimes in 2017. That includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault.\n\nThat figure is lower than the 599,282 arrests made for possession of marijuana.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The source shows that there were less arrests for violent crimes than for marijuana possession.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Moscow, Russia, metro allows free rides to commuters for 30 squats\n\nQ1: Does Moscow Russia have a scheme where you get free metro ticket if you do exercise to earn it?\nA1: In an effort to promote both the then upcoming Winter Olympic Games in Sochi and physical fitness, Moscow city officials and the Russian Olympic Committee are allowing subway riders to pay 30 squats instead of 30 rubles (about 92 cents) for a trip on thetrain.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: To promote the winter Olympics the Russian Olympics committee with the Moscow officials allowed passengers to board the train when they do squats \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Coconut oil is an antibiotic and can prevent dengue fever.\n\nQ1: It coconut oil an antibiotic?\nA1: Coconut oil is a natural antibiotic\n\nQ2: How does the claim say to use coconut oil to prevent dengue fever?\nA2: claim says to rub coconut oil below the knees to stop mosquito bites.\n\nQ3: Does putting oil on the skin prevent mosquito bites?\nA3: Compounds derived from coconut oil are better than DEET at repelling blood-sucking insects, according to a new U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) study.\n\nQ4: Can Dengue mosquitos bite above the knee?\nA4: They can fly well above the knee.\n\nQ5: Does coconut oil have antimicrobial properties\nA5: Coconut oil has various antimicrobial properties that can serve us:\nAntibacterial: exposure to lauric acid inhibits the growth of Clostridium difficile bacteria. The antibacterial properties of coconut oil act only in lipid membrane bacteria, which cause diseases such as ulcers, food poisoning, urinary tract infections, among others.\nFungicidal: coconut oil can help to regulate different types of Candida fungus.\nAntiviral: lauric acid is used against viruses such as HIV.\n\nQ6: Is coconut oil an antibiotic\nA6: Coconut oil is seen to have antimicrobial properties but isn't used as a form of treatment for infections\n\nQ7: Can coconut oil prevent dengue fever\nA7: In addition, repellency was also found against mosquitoes. An aqueous starch-based formulation containing natural coconut fatty acids was also prepared and shown to protect pastured cattle from biting flies up to 96-hours in the hot summer, which, to our knowledge, is the longest protection provided by a natural repellent product studied to date.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Coconut oil may act as a repellant and stop insects that carry dengue fever from biting, but it does not prevent dengue fever if the insect still bites. \n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Whatsapp has been sold to Mukesh Ambani.\n\nQ1: Who owns WhatsApp?\nA1: WhatsApp was founded by Jan Koum and Brian Acton who had previously spent 20 years combined at Yahoo. WhatsApp joined Facebook in 2014, but continues to operate as a separate app.\n\nQ2: Who is Mukesh Ambani?\nA2: He is an indian billionaire and businessman\n\nQ3: What is his relationship to Whatsapp?\nA3: It seems that he has some business ties with Whatsapp, but he does not own the company",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: WhatsApp has been sold to Facebook. Though Mukesh Ambani has ties with WhatsApp, he does not own it.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The EU has decided to increase the size of fisherman’s meshes.\n\nQ1: What is the relationship between mesh size and the fish that can be captured?\nA1: The size selectivity of most fishing gears can be changed by making changes to the mesh size. Bigger mesh gives the opportunity for more small fish to escape. This does depend on the smaller fish actually coming into close contact with the larger meshes.\n\nQ2: What was the EU commission change to mesh sizes at the time of the claim?\nA2: Vessels shall be prohibited from using any beam trawl with a mesh size between 32 and 99 mm north of a line joined by the following points by a point on the East Coast of the United Kingdom at latitude 55° N, then east to latitude 55°, longitude 5° E, then north to latitude 56° N and east to a point on the west coast of Denmark at latitude 56° N. It is prohibited to use any beam trawl of mesh size range 32 to 119 mm within ICES Division.\n\nQ3: Was the EU commissions change to mesh sizes around the time of the claim responsible for substantial financial losses in the fishing industry?\nA3: Aggressive fishing in the late 1950s saw an increase in landings, which started the collapse in catch numbers between 1965 and 1982 before mesh size regulations as part of EU Common Fisheries Policy (Cfp ).\n\nQ4: How does introducing a minimum size of fishing mesh in certain areas reduce fishermans income?\nA4: No answer could be found.\n\nQ5: Has the fishing mesh size been increased ?\nA5: Not increased but the EU regulation has changed and there is now a minimum mesh size in certain areas.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim makes refernce to the EU deciding to chance the size of fishing net holes to increase their size, which as Q&A 1 states will result in less fish being caught.\nQ&A 5 only shows that the EU wanted a minimum net size which is not an increase as claimed but could be for some fishermen depending.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: EU change to mesh sizes has reduced fishermen’s income by 40%.\n\nQ1: What changes did the EU make to fishermen's mesh net sizes?\nA1: '...mesh sizes are now minimum sizes and do not prevent fishermen from using larger mesh sizes if they want to.'\n\nQ2: Has this change in mesh size reduced fishermen's income by 40%?\nA2: \"Some claimed it could lose up to 40% of their income from just this one ruling\" but this comes from an unknown source cited in an interview in a Cornish news site.\n\nQ3: Did the EU's decision to increase the size of fisherman’s meshes will reduce the fisherman's income to 40% ?\nA3: The larger the mesh the easier it is for small fish to escape nets undamaged. \nEU regulation has changed and there is now a minimum mesh size in certain areas. That came in place on 1 July 2019.\nThe European Parliament and Council had two months to object to the delegated act on fishing regulations, but this didn’t happen so it is now law. It’s also now in UK law. The fishermen catching squid too and some claimed it could lose up to 40% of their income from just this one ruling but this hasnt been proved.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim even states there is no proof of the fishermen loosing 40% of their income\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Fox News Channel reports that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has suffered massive stroke.\n\nQ1: Did Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg suffer massive stroke in 2019?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: What page posted the original claim?\nA2: Fox News Channel.\n\nQ3: Is that a verified Facebook page?\nA3: No, because No verification tick.\n\nQ4: What is the verified Facebook page for Fox News?\nA4: Fox News.\n\nQ5: Did Justin Ruth suffer stroke in 2019\nA5: It was a false news that was posted from a fake account which has since been taken down .",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg did not suffered a massive stroke. The news was posted by an unverified Fox News Channel , which has since been taken down.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Varun Pulani is the director of WhatsApp.\n\nQ1: Who owns and runs Whatsapp?\nA1: WhatsApp founder Jan Koum and his business partner Brian Acton.\n\nQ2: Do they still own it?\nA2: Mr Koum, 37, and Mr Acton, 42, have sold WhatsApp to Facebook for $19bn (£11.4bn).\n\nQ3: Who is the director of Whatsapp?\nA3: Carl Woog - Director of Communications -\nCarl is currently the Director of Communications for WhatsApp, the world's largest private messaging service.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Varun Pulani isn't the director, Carl Woog is. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A proposed $4.6 billion US emergency aid bill wasn’t humanitarian.\n\nQ1: What was the $4.6 billion US emergency aid bill intended for?\nA1: The $4.6 billion bipartisan humanitarian aid bill was intended to provide shelter and care for unaccompanied children, and providing care in licensed shelters and expanding the supplies of shelters.\n\nQ2: Is some of the bill providing non-humanitarian funding?\nA2: Yes, because It included money for the military and department of justice too.\n\nQ3: Is the bill humanitarian?\nA3: Yes, because As the largest portion of the funding is for Health and Human services, which is humanitarian.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Some of the aid in the bill the claim refers too was for military, but as mostly humanitarian aid so as the claim is absolutist then it is wholly wrong\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: US Republican Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez opposed it a proposed $4.6 billion US emergency aid bill, saying it wasn’t humanitarian.\n\nQ1: Did Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez vote against a proposed $4.6 billion US emergency aid bill?\nA1: Yes, because Confirmed via votes result page shown in source.\n\nQ2: Did Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez say the bill wasnt humanitarian?\nA2: Yes, because she said: \"The $4.6 billion wasn’t humanitarian at all. It had NO accountability measures for facilities that abuse children and families. It didn’t fix the problem, just funded abuse.\"",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Seems from the question and answer pair that the Senator did vote against the bill. Therefore, the claim is supported\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: President Trump Said \"I Will Pay For July 4 Parade Out Of My Own Pocket\"\n\nQ1: Where did the claim originate from\nA1: It originated from the website called Taters.com\n\nQ2: What kind of website is Tater.com\nA2: They refer to themselves on their About Us page as \"Tatersgonnatate.com is a subsidiary of the “America’s Last Line of Defense” network of parody, satire, and tomfoolery, or as Snopes called it before they lost their war on satire: Junk News\"",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: According to the source links in the Q&A, the information in the claim was published on a satirical website, and was not regarded as verifiable information.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: President Trump said “I will pay for July 4 Parade out of my own pocket.”\n\nQ1: What is the 'July 4th parade' in the U.S?\nA1: An Annual Independence Day Parade\n\nQ2: Did Donald Trump offer to pay for a July 4Th parade?\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: Which site made this claim?\nA3: Taters gonna tate\n\nQ4: Did the site confirm the claim is true with a sourch?\nA4: No, because But it did list the claim article under a ''Satire and/or Conservative Fan Fiction'' category.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No evidence has been given here that supports this. The site quoting the matter was a satire site. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: hen asked if the United States should have a military parade to show off its might, President Dwight Eisenhower said ‘Absolutely not. We are the pre-eminent power on Earth. For us to try and imitate what the Soviets are doing in Red Square would make us look weak.’\"\n\nQ1: Where did this quote originate?\nA1: From an NPR interview with historian Michael Beschloss in 2018.\n\nQ2: What did Michael Beschloss say in his interview with NPR on 07/02/2018?\nA2: Beschloss points to the 1950s, when Dwight D. Eisenhower was president and Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev presided over large military parades showing off the latest in Soviet military might. Beschloss says some in the White House approached Eisenhower, himself a decorated military general, suggesting the U.S. do the same, to show off American might.\n\n\"Eisenhower said absolutely not, we are the pre-eminent power on Earth,\" Beschloss says, recalling Eisenhower's response. \"For us to try to imitate what the Soviets are doing in Red Square would make us look weak.\"\n\nQ3: Is there evidence that Eisenhower said, \"For us to try to imitate what the Soviets are doing in Red Square would make us look weak\"?\nA3: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: there isn't evidence that Eisenhower said this. \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: One in four South African employees have been diagnosed with depression.\n\nQ1: How common is depression in South Africa?\nA1: Depression is one of the most common mental disorders in South Africa, with an estimated 9·8% lifetime prevalence for major depressive disorder in adults.\n\nQ2: How common is depression in South African Employees?\nA2: A single study in 2016, showed one in four workers reported depression but the study in question was only for employees who worked in advertising or market research.\n\nQ3: Is this study enough to generalise to workforces in South Africa as a whole?\nA3: No, because The study has limitations as it is self reported, and does not allow the diagnosis of depression to be verified, it is also only a small sample from a specific workforce.\n\nQ4: What are the limitations of this study?\nA4: The results from this study all rely on subjective responses to an\nonline questionnaire. Anonymity supports the reliability of the data,\nhowever, the design of this study does not allow for diagnosis of\ndepression to be verified.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: As much there's a study that claims this to be true, the study has several limitations \n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: About half of Customs and Border Patrol agents were members of a secret Facebook group page that included offensive posts\n\nQ1: What is the name of the Facebook group\nA1: The Facebook group is called “I’m 10-15”\n\nQ2: How many members of the CBP are current members of \"I'm 10 - 15\"\nA2: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Since there is no answer to QA number 2, there is not enough evidence to deduce the claim. Therefore, the label is not enough evidence \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The U.S. is using SWIFT as a political weapon in its foreign policy.\n\nQ1: What is RT News?\nA1: It was founded in 2005 as Russia Today and rebranded as RT in 2009. RT News is Russia’s state-funded international broadcaster.\n\nQ2: Is RT News propaganda?\nA2: Lata Nott, the Newseum Institute's executive director says \"The edge between journalism and propaganda is very thin, especially, if we are talking about the media which is founded by the government... Not all materials of RT are propaganda, but it is very clear that they have only one angle and they have never criticised their own government.\"\n\nQ3: What is SWIFT?\nA3: Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) is a cooperative utility whose objective is to develop standardized messaging and processing of transaction services for financial institutions globally, making global cross-border transfers easier.\n\nSwift is the network backbone of the international finance industry. It serves more than 200 countries and territories. Swift payments are a type of international transfer sent via the Swift network. Swift does not facilitate the transfer of funds. Instead, it sends payment orders via its secure and reliable network, which must be then settled by the correspondent accounts that institutions have with each other. When sending or receiving international payments, a Swift code is used to identify a specific bank.\n\nQ4: What country controls SWIFT?\nA4: SWIFT is a member-owned cooperative headquartered in Belgium. SWIFT is organised under Belgian law and is owned and controlled by its shareholders, comprising more than 2,000 financial institutions. We connect more than 11,000 institutions in more than 200 countries and terrorities.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Controlled by Belgium not USA.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Detainees in US border patrol facilities told by guards to drink water from toilets.\n\nQ1: Were detainees in border patrol facilities told by guards to drink water from toilets?\nA1: Ocasio-Cortez responded to that tweet, saying it was indeed a toilet like that but the sink portion wasn’t working.\n\n“This was in fact the type of toilet we saw in the cell. Except there was just one, and the sink portion was not functioning – @AyannaPressley smartly tried to open the faucet, and nothing came out,” Ocasio-Cortez said, referring to Rep. Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts. “So the women were told they could drink out of the bowl.”\n\nQ2: Are Border Patrol agents making detainees in US border patrol facilities to drink out of toilets?\nA2: It’s unclear whether the reference to toilets was to a sink/toilet combination unit and the tap water from the sink part.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: it is unclear what was being referred to in this case, the answers say \"the women were told they could drink out the bowl\" but It’s unclear whether the reference to toilets was to a sink/toilet combination unit and the tap water from the sink part.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: About half of US Customs and Border Patrol agents were members of a secret Facebook group page that included offensive posts.\n\nQ1: Was a secret facebook group for current and former Border Patrol agents page found ?\nA1: Yes, because Page was uncovered.\n\nQ2: Are all members of the secret group Current and former border partrol workers?\nA2: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The group does exist but there is no mention of numbers who were customs and border patrol agents so the claim can not be supported and refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Guards had instructed the U.S. Customs and Border Protection detainees to drink water from toilets.\n\nQ1: Are there reports of guards telling people at the Border facilities to drink water from toilets\nA1: Three members of Congress who visited Border Patrol facilities on Monday said immigrant women were being detained without running water and told by agents to drink from the toilets.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The Q&A pair states that members of congress witnessed what is claimed so very likely to be true, and so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: We spent just over £1 trillion bailing out the banks after the financial crisis.\n\nQ1: From 2007 to 2009 how much did the government spend bailing out banks?\nA1: £137 billion.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The amount spent was £137 billion.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: North Korea blew up the office used for South Korea talks.\n\nQ1: Which office did North Korean blow up?\nA1: North Korea blew up an inter-Korean liaison office building\n\nQ2: What is the inter-Korean liaison office used for?\nA2: The Republic of Korea (ROK) and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) launched their joint liaison office on Friday, securing a platform for round-the-clock communication that is expected to help foster cross-border exchange and ease tensions.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The building used was indeed destroyed.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: RSS workers thrash a Dalit woman\n\nQ1: Where was the video of a girl being beaten with sticks in India by men originally from?\nA1: A police officer said the family members of the woman, a resident of Gatbori village, about 90 km from Dhar, were angry over her affair with the man with whom she had eloped recently, but later returned home. It was therefore nothing to do with RSS workers.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The video was not related to RSS workers\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Section 1325 of the U.S immigration law was \"put into place in 1929, by a segregationist\".\n\nQ1: What is section 1325?\nA1: Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.\n\nQ2: Who put this into place?\nA2: According to University of California Los Angeles historian Kelly Lytle Hernandez, white supremacist South Carolina Sen. Coleman Livingston Blease was its architect.\n\nQ3: Was Blease a segregationist?\nA3: Yes, because In a speech delivered in 1911 after he was sworn in as governor, Blease described his vision for South Carolina, which included \"liberal appropriations for Confederate veterans\" and having \"white and colored convicts worked in different camps.\" He also said he opposed taxing white people to cover the cost of education for black people.\n\nBlease was also a vocal supporter of lynching, and was quoted as saying, \"to hell with the Constitution,\" to the extent that it required people to be tried for crimes before a jury.\n\nQ4: What was the rule before the 1929 act?\nA4: Before this law was adopted, \"the United States essentially had open borders,\" but the 20th century saw a shift in \"thinking about illegal immigration as a problem stemming from Mexico rather than from Asia and Europe,\" according to a 2012 article in the Loyola University Chicago Law Journal .",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: True, well written\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: President Obama 'begged' to meet with Chairman Kim Jong Un, but Chairman Kim Jong Un refused.\n\nQ1: Did President Obama sought out a meet with Chairman Kim Jong Un?\nA1: No, because Ben Rhodes, former deputy national security adviser to Obama said on Twitter: \n\n\"Trump is lying. I was there for all 8 years. Obama never sought a meeting with Kim Jong Un. Foreign policy isn’t reality television it’s reality\".\n\nQ2: Was the Obama administration open to negotiations with North Korea?\nA2: Yes, because Kelsey Davenport, director for nonproliferation policy at the Arms Control Association stated:\n\n\"The Obama administration was open to negotiations with North Korea, but they set onerous preconditions for talks. Requiring that North Korea take significant steps toward denuclearization prior to diplomatic engagement is a far cry from ‘begging’ for a meeting.\"\n\nQ3: What did officials who served under President Obama say about the claim\nA3: Susan Rice said that it was not correct in no uncertain terms",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: QAs show three people who worked for President Obama confirmed that Obama did not beg for a meeting with Kim Jong Un.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: BJP Mahila Morcha Leader made offensive remarks asking Hindu brothers to rape Muslim mothers and sisters\n\nQ1: Was a hate comment made by BJP Mahila Morcha concerning Hindus and Muslims\nA1: Yes, because The woman in the claim did make hate comments and has been suspended by the party\n\nQ2: Did a local BJP Mahila Morcha Leader make offensive remarks regarding Muslims?\nA2: Yes, because BJP Mahila Morcha said it will not tolerate any hateful comments whatsoever from any karyakarta. The lady in question has been expelled\n\nQ3: Who was the lady in question who made hateful comments and was removed?\nA3: Sunitha Singh Gowda\n\nQ4: Did she make that the comments the claim refers to?\nA4: Yes, because They appear in her profile",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Supported by answers and sources given in QA pairs.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Migrant children housed at U.S. Customs and Border Protection detention facilities at the border are receiving access to key supplies, including toothbrushes, appropriate meals, blankets, showers as soon as they can be provided and medical screening.\n\nQ1: Has the Office of Inspector General inspected and reported on the conditions at Border Patrol Facilites?\nA1: Yes, because During the week of\nJune 10, 2019, they travelled to the Rio Grande Valley in Texas, inspected facilities and issued a report.\n\nQ2: According to the 2019 IG report on Border Patrol facilities, were children receiving appropriate meals?\nA2: No, because Two facilities had not provided children access to hot meals — as is required by the TEDS standards — until the week we arrived. Instead, the children were fed sandwiches and snacks for their meals.\n\nQ3: According to the 2019 IG report on Border Patrol facilities, did children have access to showers?\nA3: No, because Children at three of the five Border Patrol facilities we visited had no access to showers.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The inspection results and a date that this happened provides concise evidence that even if these services were provided in some places, it was certainly not across the board. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Kenya's County governments have allocated on average 6.7 % of their total budgets to the agriculture sector\n\nQ1: What percentage of their total budget did Kenya’s county governments allocate to agriculture in the 2017/18 financial year?\nA1: 5.6%\n\nQ2: What percentage of their total budget did Kenya’s county governments allocate to agriculture in the first six months of the 2018/19 financial year?\nA2: 6.3%",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The average of 5.6 and 6.3 is 5.95%, not 6.7%.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Since 2013, County Governments in Kenya have cumulatively received KSh1.57 trillion worth of the equitable share of the allocation of the consolidated fund revenue budget.\n\nQ1: How much money have county Governments in Kenya cumulatively received from the consolidated fund revenue budget?\nA1: National-Treasury-on-County-Fiscal-Transfers shows KSh1.3 trillion transferred to counties in Kenya.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is to much of a difference between the confirmed 1.3 and the claimed 1.57 for it just to be a rounding up error.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Children in U.S. Customs and Border Protection custody are receiving appropriate meals and showers.\n\nQ1: What meals are children in U.S. Customs and Border Protection custody receiving?\nA1: While all facilities had\ninfant formula, diapers, baby wipes, and juice and snacks for children, we\nobserved that two facilities had not provided children access to hot meals\n— as is required by the TEDS standards — until the week we arrived.\nInstead, the children were fed sandwiches and snacks for their meals.\n\nQ2: Do children in U.S. Customs and Border Protection custody have access to showers?\nA2: No, because For example, children at three of\nthe five Border Patrol facilities we visited had no access to showers,\ndespite the TEDS standards requiring that “reasonable efforts” be made to\nprovide showers to children approaching 48 hours in detention. At these\nfacilities, children had limited access to a change of clothes; Border Patrol\nhad few spare clothes and no laundry facilities.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Standards are not meeting the required TEDS standards. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In 2013 to 2019 the total shareable revenue in Kenya totalled 7.8 trillion shillings, of which 20% or KSh1.57 trillion was transferred to the counties.\n\nQ1: What was the total shareable revenue in Kenya in 2013?\nA1: KSh920.4 billion\n\nQ2: What was the total shareable revenue in Kenya in 2014?\nA2: KSh1,026. 3 billion\n\nQ3: What was the total shareable revenue in Kenya in 2015?\nA3: KSh1,242.7 billion\n\nQ4: What was the total shareable revenue in Kenya in 2016?\nA4: KSh1,380.2 billion\n\nQ5: What was the total shareable revenue in Kenya in 2017?\nA5: KSh1,560.3 billion\n\nQ6: What was the total shareable revenue in Kenya in 2018?\nA6: KSh1,688.5 billion\n\nQ7: What was the total amount of shareable revenue in Kenya as at 30 May 2019?\nA7: KSh7.8 trillion\n\nQ8: What was the total amount of national revenue transferred to the counties as at 30 May 2019?\nA8: According to the treasury, the transfers to county governments as at 30 May 2019 add up to KSh1,611 billion. The controller of budget’s report puts the amount approved for use by counties at KSh1,514 trillion up to 31 March 2019. These work out as 21% and 19% of the KSh7.8 trillion in total shareable revenue.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers show that the claim is correct. Therefore the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: KSh1.57 trillion is equivalent to 20% of the total shareable revenue of 7.8 trillion shillings.\n\nQ1: What was the total shareable revenue from 2013 to 2019 in the division of revenue acts?\nA1: -2013 – KSh920.4 billion\n-2014 – KSh1,026. 3 billion\n-2015 – KSh1,242.7 billion\n-2016 – KSh1,380.2 billion\n-2017 – KSh1,560.3 billion\n-2018 – KSh1,688.5 billion\n\nQ2: How much does 2013 to 2018 total shareable revenue add up to?\nA2: KSh7, 818 billion, or KSh7.8 trillion\n\nQ3: What is the percentage equivalent for the total shareable revenue between 2012-2019?\nA3: These work out as 21% and 19% of the KSh7.8 trillion in total shareable revenue",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The numbers appear to add up \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: as of 2019, 47 Kenyan counties has met the two-thirds threshold on the appointment of the county executive committee members, with three counties of Kilifi, Nyeri and Kericho attaining a 50-50 representation.\n\nQ1: What is the two-thirds threshold in Kenya?\nA1: Kenya’s constitution promotes gender equality by setting out that “not more than two-thirds of the members of elective or appointive bodies shall be of the same gender”.\n\nQ2: How many counties have met this gender principle?\nA2: Each of the 47 counties have met this principle\n\nQ3: Have Kilifi, Neyeri and Kericho met the 50/50 ratio?\nA3: Yes, because in Kilifi, Nyeri and Kericho counties there’s gender parity in the composition of the county cabinets.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: In Kilifi, Nyeri and Kericho counties there’s gender parity in the composition of the county cabinets.\n\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Kenya experienced an increase in the number of functional health facilities growing from 9,858 to 10,820 in 2018 across all counties.\n\nQ1: How many health facilities were in Kenya in 2017\nA1: 9,858\n\nQ2: What was the increment in health facilities between 2017 and 2018\nA2: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is no evidence giving the amount of health facilities open in 2018 so I cannot support or refute the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In Kenya, since 2013, county governments have cumulatively received Ksh1.57 trillion worth of equitable share of allocation.\n\nQ1: How much was actually received by counties from 2012/12 to 2018/19?\nA1: The amount actually received by counties is between KSh1.611 trillion and KSh1.514 trillion.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: From the Q&A it is found that the amount received is correct, as 1.57 falls between 1.514 to 1.611, so the claim is supported. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In Kenya the County Governments’ allocation of 6.7% of their total budgets to the agriculture sector is just 3% less than the 10% recommended allocation for agriculture as per the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP) Malabo declaration.\n\nQ1: is the County Governments’ allocation of 6.7% of their total budgets to the agriculture sector just 3% less than the 10% recommended allocation for agriculture as per the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program ?\nA1: In 2018/19, agriculture’s share rose to KSh29.1 billion (6.3%) out of a total of KSh462.1 billion. A 10% allocation would have been KSh46.2 billion.\n\nThis works out to a difference of just over three percentage points. \n\nBut the difference between the 2018/19 allocation of KSh29.1 billion and the Malabo aspiration of at least 10% of the total county budget (KSh46.2 billion) works out to a gap of 37%, not 3%.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Both figures are incorrect. Even though one is only out by a few percentage points, the other one is hugely different. So it cant be said to be correct. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: KSh1.57 trillion is equivalent to 20% of Kenya's total shareable revenue of KSh7.8 trillion.\n\nQ1: What is the date for this claim?\nA1: 2019\n\nQ2: What is Kenya's total shareable revenue between 2013 and the claim date 2019?\nA2: The total shareable revenue from 2013 to 2019 is given in the division of revenue acts: \n2013 – KSh920.4 billion\n2014 – KSh1,026.3 billion\n2015 – KSh1,242.7 billion\n2016 – KSh1,380.2 billion\n2017 – KSh1,560.3 billion\n2018 – KSh1,688.5 billion\n\nThese add up to KSh7,818 trillion\n\nQ3: What is 20% of 7.818 trillion?\nA3: 1.56 trillion",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers show that 20% is 1.57 trillion and the revenue amount is also correct so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In Kenya, the amount of total budgets, allocated for agriculture is just 3% less than the recommended allocation of 10%, as per the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP) Malabo declaration.\n\nQ1: How much was the county budget in Kenya for agriculture in 2017/2018\nA1: KSh 23 billion\n\nQ2: How much was the county budget in Kenya for agriculture in 2018/2019\nA2: KSh 29 billion\n\nQ3: How much was the estimated 10% that was agreed upon in the Malabo Declaration for for 2017/2018\nA3: Ksh 46.2 billion\n\nQ4: How much was the estimated 10% that was agreed upon in the Malabo Declaration for for 2018/2019\nA4: KSh 46.2 billion\n\nQ5: What is the difference in percentage between the actual money and the percentage amount agreed during the Malabo declaration\nA5: The difference is 37%",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The 5th answer shows that the difference is more that 3% so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In Kenya, for the 2018/19 year under review all County Governments allocated at least 20% of their budgets to health.\n\nQ1: Who collects data on Kenya's counties budget spending on health?\nA1: The controller of budget’\n\nQ2: What does the controller of the budget show for Kenya's counties health spending from their budget for the year the claim was made?\nA2: In 2018/19 the counties allocated KSh114.6 billion to health out of a budget of KSh462.1 billion, giving health a 25% share",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Kenya's county governments allocated a 25% share from their budgets, not 20%. Hence, this claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In 2019, each of Kenya's 47 counties met the two-thirds threshold for the appointment of county executive committee members, with Kilifi, Nyeri, and Kericho counties attaining 50-50 gender equality representation.\n\nQ1: How many counties in Kenya have met the two-thirds threshold for the appointment of county executive committee members?\nA1: 47 counties have met the two-thirds threshold for the appointment of county executive committee members.\n\nQ2: Which counties have attained 50-50 gender equality representation in the appointment of the county executive committee members?\nA2: Kilifi, Nyeri, and Kericho counties have attained 50-50 gender equality representation in the appointment of the county executive committee members.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Source is the Kenya National Bureau of Statistics and they should know.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: So far, each of the 47 counties has met the two-thirds threshold on the appointment of the county executive committee members, with three counties of Kilifi, Nyeri and Kericho attaining a 50-50 representation.\n\nQ1: What is the two-thirds threshold on the appointment of the county executive committee members in Kenya?\nA1: It is Kenya’s 2/3rd Gender Principle that not more than two-thirds of the members of elective or appointive bodies shall be of the same gender\n\nQ2: How many counties in Kenya had met the the two-thirds threshold on the appointment of the county executive committee members?\nA2: 47 counties had adhered to this gender principle\n\nQ3: Had any counties did better than the 2/3rds principle?\nA3: Yes, because Kilifi, Nyeri and Kericho counties had managed a 50/50 ratio.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Supported via numbers in answers.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits