<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's wedding ring is not missing, as if laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of stalking laura, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of stalking laura
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis did not have a history of stalking laura.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of stalking laura, since if john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of stalking laura, because if john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of stalking laura, as if john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of stalking laura then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of stalking Laura
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a shattered vase was found in the hallway, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a shattered vase was found in the hallway, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a shattered vase was found in the hallway, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a shattered vase was found in the hallway, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a shattered vase was found in the hallway, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a shattered vase was found in the hallway, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a shattered vase was found in the hallway, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and a shattered vase was found in the hallway, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street and a shattered vase was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street and a shattered vase was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street and a shattered vase was found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A shattered vase was found in the hallway
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a shattered vase was not found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A shattered vase was not found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a shattered vase was not found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A shattered vase was not found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a shattered vase was not found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A shattered vase was not found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a shattered vase was not found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A shattered vase was not found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a shattered vase was not found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A shattered vase was not found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a shattered vase was not found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A shattered vase was not found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a shattered vase was not found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A shattered vase was not found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a shattered vase was not found in the hallway.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A shattered vase was not found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A shattered vase was not found in the hallway, since if a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A shattered vase was not found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A shattered vase was not found in the hallway, because if a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A shattered vase was not found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A shattered vase was not found in the hallway, as if a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a shattered vase was found in the hallway then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A shattered vase was not found in the hallway
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's prescription medications were stolen, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's prescription medications were stolen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's prescription medications were stolen, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's prescription medications were stolen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's prescription medications were stolen, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's prescription medications were stolen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's prescription medications were stolen, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's prescription medications were stolen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's prescription medications were stolen, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's prescription medications were stolen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's prescription medications were stolen, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's prescription medications were stolen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's prescription medications were stolen, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's prescription medications were stolen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's prescription medications were stolen, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's prescription medications were stolen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's prescription medications were stolen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's prescription medications were stolen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's prescription medications were stolen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's prescription medications were stolen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's prescription medications were stolen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's prescription medications were stolen
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's prescription medications were not stolen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's prescription medications were not stolen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's prescription medications were not stolen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's prescription medications were not stolen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's prescription medications were not stolen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's prescription medications were not stolen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's prescription medications were not stolen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's prescription medications were not stolen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's prescription medications were not stolen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's prescription medications were not stolen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's prescription medications were not stolen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's prescription medications were not stolen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's prescription medications were not stolen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's prescription medications were not stolen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's prescription medications were not stolen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's prescription medications were not stolen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's prescription medications were not stolen, since if laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's prescription medications were not stolen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's prescription medications were not stolen, because if laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's prescription medications were not stolen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's prescription medications were not stolen, as if laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's prescription medications were stolen then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's prescription medications were not stolen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and a gas leak was detected in the basement, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A gas leak was detected in the basement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and a gas leak was detected in the basement, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A gas leak was detected in the basement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and a gas leak was detected in the basement, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A gas leak was detected in the basement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and a gas leak was detected in the basement, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A gas leak was detected in the basement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and a gas leak was detected in the basement, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A gas leak was detected in the basement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and a gas leak was detected in the basement, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A gas leak was detected in the basement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and a gas leak was detected in the basement, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A gas leak was detected in the basement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and a gas leak was detected in the basement, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A gas leak was detected in the basement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street and a gas leak was detected in the basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A gas leak was detected in the basement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street and a gas leak was detected in the basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A gas leak was detected in the basement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street and a gas leak was detected in the basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A gas leak was detected in the basement
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a gas leak was not detected in the basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A gas leak was not detected in the basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a gas leak was not detected in the basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A gas leak was not detected in the basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a gas leak was not detected in the basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A gas leak was not detected in the basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a gas leak was not detected in the basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A gas leak was not detected in the basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a gas leak was not detected in the basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A gas leak was not detected in the basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a gas leak was not detected in the basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A gas leak was not detected in the basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a gas leak was not detected in the basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A gas leak was not detected in the basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a gas leak was not detected in the basement.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A gas leak was not detected in the basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A gas leak was not detected in the basement, since if a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A gas leak was not detected in the basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A gas leak was not detected in the basement, because if a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A gas leak was not detected in the basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A gas leak was not detected in the basement, as if a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a gas leak was detected in the basement then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A gas leak was not detected in the basement
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of substance abuse, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of substance abuse
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of substance abuse, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of substance abuse
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of substance abuse, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of substance abuse
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of substance abuse, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of substance abuse
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of substance abuse, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of substance abuse
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of substance abuse, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of substance abuse
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of substance abuse, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of substance abuse
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of substance abuse, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of substance abuse
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of substance abuse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of substance abuse
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of substance abuse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of substance abuse
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of substance abuse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of substance abuse then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of substance abuse
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.