<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident, since if laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident, because if laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident, as if laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's car was vandalized the week before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's car was not vandalized the week before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house, since if a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house, because if a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A neighbor did not report seeing john loitering around laura's house, as if a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported seeing john loitering around laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A neighbor did not report seeing John loitering around Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone, since if laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone, because if laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone, as if laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's friends received disturbing messages from her phone then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's friends did not receive disturbing messages from her phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street and a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A threatening message was left on laura's answering machine
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that a threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine, since if a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine, because if a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A threatening message was not left on laura's answering machine, as if a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening message was left on laura's answering machine then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: A threatening message was not left on Laura's answering machine
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's wedding ring is missing, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's wedding ring is missing, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's wedding ring is missing, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's wedding ring is missing, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's wedding ring is missing, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's wedding ring is missing, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's wedding ring is missing, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's wedding ring is missing, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's wedding ring is missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's wedding ring is missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's wedding ring is missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's wedding ring is missing
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's wedding ring is not missing.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's wedding ring is not missing, since if laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's wedding ring is not missing, because if laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's wedding ring is missing then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's wedding ring is not missing
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.