<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident, since if laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident, because if laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident, as if laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's alarm system was disabled before the incident then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's alarm system was not disabled before the incident
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was found in john davis's car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was found in john davis's car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was found in john davis's car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was found in john davis's car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was found in john davis's car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was found in john davis's car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was found in john davis's car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was found in john davis's car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street and a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was found in john davis's car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street and a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was found in john davis's car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street and a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A bloody shirt was found in john davis's car
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no bloody shirt was found in john davis's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shirt was found in John Davis's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no bloody shirt was found in john davis's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shirt was found in John Davis's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no bloody shirt was found in john davis's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shirt was found in John Davis's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no bloody shirt was found in john davis's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shirt was found in John Davis's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no bloody shirt was found in john davis's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shirt was found in John Davis's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no bloody shirt was found in john davis's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shirt was found in John Davis's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no bloody shirt was found in john davis's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shirt was found in John Davis's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no bloody shirt was found in john davis's car.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shirt was found in John Davis's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No bloody shirt was found in john davis's car, since if a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shirt was found in John Davis's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No bloody shirt was found in john davis's car, because if a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shirt was found in John Davis's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No bloody shirt was found in john davis's car, as if a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody shirt was found in john davis's car then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No bloody shirt was found in John Davis's car
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed her social media passwords, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had recently changed her social media passwords
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed her social media passwords, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had recently changed her social media passwords
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed her social media passwords, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had recently changed her social media passwords
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed her social media passwords, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had recently changed her social media passwords
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed her social media passwords, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had recently changed her social media passwords
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed her social media passwords, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had recently changed her social media passwords
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed her social media passwords, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had recently changed her social media passwords
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had recently changed her social media passwords, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had recently changed her social media passwords
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had recently changed her social media passwords.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had recently changed her social media passwords
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had recently changed her social media passwords.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had recently changed her social media passwords
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had recently changed her social media passwords.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had recently changed her social media passwords
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura had not recently changed her social media passwords.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura had not recently changed her social media passwords.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura had not recently changed her social media passwords.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura had not recently changed her social media passwords.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura had not recently changed her social media passwords.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura had not recently changed her social media passwords.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura had not recently changed her social media passwords.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura had not recently changed her social media passwords.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords, since if laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords, because if laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords, as if laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had recently changed her social media passwords then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura had not recently changed her social media passwords
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness heard screams coming from laura's house, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness heard screams coming from laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness heard screams coming from laura's house, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness heard screams coming from laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness heard screams coming from laura's house, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness heard screams coming from laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness heard screams coming from laura's house, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness heard screams coming from laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness heard screams coming from laura's house, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness heard screams coming from laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness heard screams coming from laura's house, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness heard screams coming from laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness heard screams coming from laura's house, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness heard screams coming from laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness heard screams coming from laura's house, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness heard screams coming from laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness heard screams coming from laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness heard screams coming from laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness heard screams coming from laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness heard screams coming from laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and a witness heard screams coming from laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness heard screams coming from laura's house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no witness heard screams coming from laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness heard screams coming from Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no witness heard screams coming from laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness heard screams coming from Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no witness heard screams coming from laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness heard screams coming from Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no witness heard screams coming from laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness heard screams coming from Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no witness heard screams coming from laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness heard screams coming from Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no witness heard screams coming from laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness heard screams coming from Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no witness heard screams coming from laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness heard screams coming from Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no witness heard screams coming from laura's house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness heard screams coming from Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness heard screams coming from laura's house, since if a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness heard screams coming from Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness heard screams coming from laura's house, because if a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness heard screams coming from Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No witness heard screams coming from laura's house, as if a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness heard screams coming from laura's house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No witness heard screams coming from Laura's house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of psychiatric issues, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of psychiatric issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of psychiatric issues, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of psychiatric issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of psychiatric issues, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of psychiatric issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of psychiatric issues, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of psychiatric issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of psychiatric issues, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of psychiatric issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of psychiatric issues, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of psychiatric issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of psychiatric issues, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of psychiatric issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis had a history of psychiatric issues, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of psychiatric issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of psychiatric issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of psychiatric issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of psychiatric issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of psychiatric issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis had a history of psychiatric issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis had a history of psychiatric issues
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.