<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues, since if john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues, because if john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues, as if john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of psychiatric issues then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of psychiatric issues
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street and laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van, since if laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van, because if laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van, as if laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's neighbors reported seeing a suspicious van then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura's neighbors did not report seeing a suspicious van
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a broken window was found in laura's bedroom, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A broken window was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a broken window was found in laura's bedroom, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A broken window was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a broken window was found in laura's bedroom, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A broken window was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a broken window was found in laura's bedroom, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A broken window was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a broken window was found in laura's bedroom, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A broken window was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a broken window was found in laura's bedroom, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A broken window was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a broken window was found in laura's bedroom, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A broken window was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and a broken window was found in laura's bedroom, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A broken window was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street and a broken window was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A broken window was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street and a broken window was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A broken window was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street and a broken window was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A broken window was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore no broken window was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No broken window was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence no broken window was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No broken window was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus no broken window was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No broken window was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that no broken window was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No broken window was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so no broken window was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No broken window was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that no broken window was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No broken window was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that no broken window was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No broken window was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that no broken window was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No broken window was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No broken window was found in laura's bedroom, since if a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No broken window was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No broken window was found in laura's bedroom, because if a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No broken window was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No broken window was found in laura's bedroom, as if a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a broken window was found in laura's bedroom then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: No broken window was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was caught on camera buying duct tape
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was caught on camera buying duct tape
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was caught on camera buying duct tape
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was caught on camera buying duct tape
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was caught on camera buying duct tape
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was caught on camera buying duct tape
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was caught on camera buying duct tape
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was caught on camera buying duct tape
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was caught on camera buying duct tape
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was caught on camera buying duct tape
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street and john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: John davis was caught on camera buying duct tape
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore john davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence john davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus john davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that john davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so john davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that john davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that john davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that john davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape, since if john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape, because if john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape, as if john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was caught on camera buying duct tape then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: John Davis was not caught on camera buying duct tape
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had a secret storage room in her house, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a secret storage room in her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had a secret storage room in her house, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a secret storage room in her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had a secret storage room in her house, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a secret storage room in her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had a secret storage room in her house, so it can be concluded that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a secret storage room in her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had a secret storage room in her house, so the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a secret storage room in her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had a secret storage room in her house, which implies that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a secret storage room in her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had a secret storage room in her house, which shows that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a secret storage room in her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and laura had a secret storage room in her house, which establishes that the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a secret storage room in her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, since if laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had a secret storage room in her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a secret storage room in her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, because if laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had a secret storage room in her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a secret storage room in her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The arson occurred on elm street, as if laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street and laura had a secret storage room in her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Laura had a secret storage room in her house
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, therefore laura did not have a secret storage room in her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, hence laura did not have a secret storage room in her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, thus laura did not have a secret storage room in her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so it can be concluded that laura did not have a secret storage room in her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, so laura did not have a secret storage room in her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which implies that laura did not have a secret storage room in her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which shows that laura did not have a secret storage room in her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street, and the arson did not occur on elm street, which establishes that laura did not have a secret storage room in her house.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house, since if laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house, because if laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house, as if laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street and the arson did not occur on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a secret storage room in her house then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: The arson did not occur on elm street
Conclusion: Laura did not have a secret storage room in her house
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis leaving the scene in a hurry then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw john davis leaving the scene in a hurry, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis leaving the scene in a hurry then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis leaving the scene in a hurry
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis leaving the scene in a hurry then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw john davis leaving the scene in a hurry, hence the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis leaving the scene in a hurry then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis leaving the scene in a hurry
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness saw john davis leaving the scene in a hurry then the arson occurred on elm street, and a witness saw john davis leaving the scene in a hurry, thus the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness saw john davis leaving the scene in a hurry then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: A witness saw john davis leaving the scene in a hurry
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.