<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
stringlengths
355
1.02k
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky, since if emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky, because if emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky, as if emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is not shaky Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings, since if a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings, because if a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in charlie's belongings, as if a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was discovered in charlie's belongings then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A handwritten manifesto against the wealthy was not discovered in Charlie's belongings Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: A bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door, since if a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door, because if a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```A bloody handprint was not found on sarah's car door, as if a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloody handprint was found on sarah's car door then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: A bloody handprint was not found on Sarah's car door Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, since if officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, because if officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```Officer jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene, as if officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer jackson noticed fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Officer Jackson did not notice fresh tire tracks leading away from the scene Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: Emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Type of argument: modus ponen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity: ```If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily claims to have lost her phone on the night of the murder then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed Conclusion: Emily does not claim to have lost her phone on the night of the murder Type of argument: modus tollen Validity: True </s>