<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The store's security system had not been tampered with before the robbery, as if the store's security system had been tampered with before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the store's security system had been tampered with before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The store's security system had not been tampered with before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore detective ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in Sarah's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence detective ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in Sarah's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus detective ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in Sarah's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that detective ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in Sarah's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so detective ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in Sarah's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that detective ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in Sarah's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that detective ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in Sarah's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that detective ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in Sarah's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom, since if detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in Sarah's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom, because if detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in Sarah's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom, as if detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective ellis discovered a hidden compartment in sarah's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Ellis did not discover a hidden compartment in Sarah's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon, since if emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon, because if emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon, as if emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's fingerprints were found on the murder weapon then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Emily's fingerprints were not found on the murder weapon
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson had a history of financial troubles, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a history of financial troubles
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson had a history of financial troubles, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a history of financial troubles
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson had a history of financial troubles, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a history of financial troubles
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson had a history of financial troubles, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a history of financial troubles
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson had a history of financial troubles, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a history of financial troubles
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson had a history of financial troubles, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a history of financial troubles
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson had a history of financial troubles, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a history of financial troubles
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and richard anderson had a history of financial troubles, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a history of financial troubles
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and richard anderson had a history of financial troubles.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a history of financial troubles
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and richard anderson had a history of financial troubles.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a history of financial troubles
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and richard anderson had a history of financial troubles.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Richard anderson had a history of financial troubles
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore richard anderson did not have a history of financial troubles.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a history of financial troubles
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence richard anderson did not have a history of financial troubles.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a history of financial troubles
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus richard anderson did not have a history of financial troubles.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a history of financial troubles
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that richard anderson did not have a history of financial troubles.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a history of financial troubles
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so richard anderson did not have a history of financial troubles.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a history of financial troubles
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that richard anderson did not have a history of financial troubles.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a history of financial troubles
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that richard anderson did not have a history of financial troubles.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a history of financial troubles
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that richard anderson did not have a history of financial troubles.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a history of financial troubles
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Richard anderson did not have a history of financial troubles, since if richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a history of financial troubles
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Richard anderson did not have a history of financial troubles, because if richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a history of financial troubles
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Richard anderson did not have a history of financial troubles, as if richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If richard anderson had a history of financial troubles then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Richard Anderson did not have a history of financial troubles
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that the jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization, since if the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization, because if the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization, as if the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If the jewelry store's alarm code was changed without authorization then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: The jewelry store's alarm code was not changed without authorization
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.