<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, since if a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, because if a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake, as if a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a witness claims to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A witness does not claim to have seen a suspicious van with a logo resembling a snake
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, since if surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, because if surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery, as if surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If surveillance footage shows a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Surveillance footage does not show a hooded figure casing the store days before the robbery
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse, since if detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse, because if detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Detective nguyen did not find a threatening note in sarah's purse, as if detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If detective nguyen found a threatening note in sarah's purse then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Detective Nguyen did not find a threatening note in Sarah's purse
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death, since if sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death, because if sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Sarah's best friend, lisa, was not in financial distress before her death, as if sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If sarah's best friend, lisa, was in financial distress before her death then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Sarah's best friend, Lisa, was not in financial distress before her death
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that a delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, since if a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, because if a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store, as if a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a delivery driver reported seeing a masked man near the jewelry store then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: A delivery driver did not report seeing a masked man near the jewelry store
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Emily's alibi for the night of the murder is shaky
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.