<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a recorded argument with laura on his phone, as if john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a recorded argument with Laura on his phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's personal files were deleted from her computer, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's personal files were deleted from her computer
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's personal files were deleted from her computer, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's personal files were deleted from her computer
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's personal files were deleted from her computer, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's personal files were deleted from her computer
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's personal files were deleted from her computer, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's personal files were deleted from her computer
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's personal files were deleted from her computer, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's personal files were deleted from her computer
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's personal files were deleted from her computer, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's personal files were deleted from her computer
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's personal files were deleted from her computer, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's personal files were deleted from her computer
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's personal files were deleted from her computer, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's personal files were deleted from her computer
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's personal files were deleted from her computer.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's personal files were deleted from her computer
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's personal files were deleted from her computer.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's personal files were deleted from her computer
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's personal files were deleted from her computer.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's personal files were deleted from her computer
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer, since if laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer, because if laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer, as if laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's personal files were deleted from her computer then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's personal files were not deleted from her computer
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night, since if a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night, because if a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night, as if a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No neighbor reported hearing glass breaking at night
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of identity theft, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of identity theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of identity theft, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of identity theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of identity theft, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of identity theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of identity theft, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of identity theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of identity theft, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of identity theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of identity theft, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of identity theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of identity theft, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of identity theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a history of identity theft, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of identity theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a history of identity theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of identity theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a history of identity theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of identity theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a history of identity theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a history of identity theft
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore john davis did not have a history of identity theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of identity theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence john davis did not have a history of identity theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of identity theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus john davis did not have a history of identity theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of identity theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have a history of identity theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of identity theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so john davis did not have a history of identity theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of identity theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that john davis did not have a history of identity theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of identity theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that john davis did not have a history of identity theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of identity theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that john davis did not have a history of identity theft.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of identity theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of identity theft, since if john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of identity theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of identity theft, because if john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of identity theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a history of identity theft, as if john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a history of identity theft then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a history of identity theft
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats, since if laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats, because if laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats, as if laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's family reported receiving anonymous threats then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's family did not report receiving anonymous threats
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A threatening letter was mailed to laura's workplace
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.