<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not found with a bag of cash, since if john davis was found with a bag of cash then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was found with a bag of cash then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not found with a bag of cash
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not found with a bag of cash, because if john davis was found with a bag of cash then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was found with a bag of cash then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not found with a bag of cash
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis was not found with a bag of cash, as if john davis was found with a bag of cash then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis was found with a bag of cash then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis was not found with a bag of cash
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's mail was tampered with, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's mail was tampered with
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's mail was tampered with, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's mail was tampered with
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's mail was tampered with, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's mail was tampered with
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's mail was tampered with, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's mail was tampered with
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's mail was tampered with, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's mail was tampered with
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's mail was tampered with, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's mail was tampered with
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's mail was tampered with, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's mail was tampered with
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's mail was tampered with, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's mail was tampered with
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's mail was tampered with.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's mail was tampered with
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's mail was tampered with.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's mail was tampered with
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's mail was tampered with.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's mail was tampered with
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore laura's mail was not tampered with.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's mail was not tampered with
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence laura's mail was not tampered with.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's mail was not tampered with
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus laura's mail was not tampered with.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's mail was not tampered with
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that laura's mail was not tampered with.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's mail was not tampered with
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so laura's mail was not tampered with.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's mail was not tampered with
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that laura's mail was not tampered with.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's mail was not tampered with
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that laura's mail was not tampered with.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's mail was not tampered with
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that laura's mail was not tampered with.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's mail was not tampered with
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's mail was not tampered with, since if laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's mail was not tampered with
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's mail was not tampered with, because if laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's mail was not tampered with
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's mail was not tampered with, as if laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's mail was tampered with then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's mail was not tampered with
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No bloodstained letter was discovered in Laura's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No bloodstained letter was discovered in Laura's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No bloodstained letter was discovered in Laura's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No bloodstained letter was discovered in Laura's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No bloodstained letter was discovered in Laura's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No bloodstained letter was discovered in Laura's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No bloodstained letter was discovered in Laura's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No bloodstained letter was discovered in Laura's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office, since if a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No bloodstained letter was discovered in Laura's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office, because if a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No bloodstained letter was discovered in Laura's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office, as if a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a bloodstained letter was discovered in laura's office then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No bloodstained letter was discovered in Laura's office
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his arms and neck, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his arms and neck
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his arms and neck, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his arms and neck
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his arms and neck, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his arms and neck
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his arms and neck, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his arms and neck
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his arms and neck, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his arms and neck
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his arms and neck, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his arms and neck
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his arms and neck, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his arms and neck
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had scratches on his arms and neck, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his arms and neck
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had scratches on his arms and neck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his arms and neck
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had scratches on his arms and neck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his arms and neck
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had scratches on his arms and neck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had scratches on his arms and neck
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore john davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence john davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus john davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so john davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that john davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that john davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that john davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck, since if john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck, because if john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck, as if john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had scratches on his arms and neck then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have scratches on his arms and neck
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura had a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura had a history of changing her locks frequently
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently, since if laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently, because if laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently, as if laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura had a history of changing her locks frequently then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura did not have a history of changing her locks frequently
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.