<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street, and officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene, therefore the arson occurred on elm street.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene then the arson occurred on elm street
Premise 2: Officer smith found a broken window at the crime scene
Conclusion: The arson occurred on Elm Street
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s>
stringlengths 355
1.02k
|
|---|
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, since if a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, because if a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom, as if a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a hidden camera was found in laura's bedroom then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No hidden camera was found in Laura's bedroom
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a collection of disturbing photographs
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that john davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs, since if john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs, because if john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs, as if john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a collection of disturbing photographs then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a collection of disturbing photographs
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and laura's dog was found locked in a closet, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's dog was found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's dog was found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and laura's dog was found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: Laura's dog was found locked in a closet
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that laura's dog was not found locked in a closet.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet, since if laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet, because if laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet, as if laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If laura's dog was found locked in a closet then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: Laura's dog was not found locked in a closet
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: A cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that no cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, since if a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, because if a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```No cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen, as if a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If a cryptic message was left on laura's computer screen then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: No cryptic message was left on Laura's computer screen
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone, therefore the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone, hence the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone, thus the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone, so it can be concluded that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone, so the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone, which implies that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone, which shows that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone, which establishes that the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, since if john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, because if john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, as if john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: John davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone
Conclusion: The cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Type of argument: modus ponen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, therefore john davis did not have a recorded argument with laura on his phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a recorded argument with Laura on his phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, hence john davis did not have a recorded argument with laura on his phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a recorded argument with Laura on his phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, thus john davis did not have a recorded argument with laura on his phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a recorded argument with Laura on his phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so it can be concluded that john davis did not have a recorded argument with laura on his phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a recorded argument with Laura on his phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, so john davis did not have a recorded argument with laura on his phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a recorded argument with Laura on his phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which implies that john davis did not have a recorded argument with laura on his phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a recorded argument with Laura on his phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which shows that john davis did not have a recorded argument with laura on his phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a recorded argument with Laura on his phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed, and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed, which establishes that john davis did not have a recorded argument with laura on his phone.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a recorded argument with Laura on his phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a recorded argument with laura on his phone, since if john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a recorded argument with Laura on his phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
<s>[INST] Analize the following argument, identifying premises, conclusion, type of argument, and argument validity:
```John davis did not have a recorded argument with laura on his phone, because if john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed and the cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed.``` [/INST] Premise 1: If john davis had a recorded argument with laura on his phone then the cat is sleeping soundly on the bed
Premise 2: The cat is not sleeping soundly on the bed
Conclusion: John Davis did not have a recorded argument with Laura on his phone
Type of argument: modus tollen
Validity: True </s> |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.