text
stringlengths 1
29.3k
⌀ | label
float64 0
1
|
|---|---|
"
Gastrich block
Just looked at the block on User talk:Jason Gastrich and noticed something... see how it says ""The block is for a period of one year from 21 March, 2007."" The wording's off; it should read that it's from 21 March, 2006. Otherwise, the implication is that the block starts about a year from now. I'm guessing that's a template thing, but in any case, thought you might want to fix the typo. ...since it's of such immense importance, and all. Man, my hard work here just knows no bounds. "
| 0 |
The ark pic is a lot easier on the eyes than the synagogue pic. I wouldn't object if you switched the two out.
| 0 |
I don't mind- I only removed them because there was a stink when they were added, and it was resolved that they would only be temporary until it had been reduced appropriately (unless I'm imagining that). None of the other HP books have subheadings either. I though removing them would discourage embellishment of the plot - makes it look like it should be a shorter length. But as I said, I don't mind. If people want them in, then they should be there. Sorry - was maybe too bold.
| 0 |
As long as the time frpm Big Bang is identical the question is yes (plus minus a statistical error - I'm not sure if a cubic has enough photons for good statistics).
| 0 |
Wikipedia:Mediation meeting
Template:Mediation-meeting
Please edit the side box here (be brief) to update when you might be able to attend. Thanks. -V 22:06, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
| 0 |
OK ill respect your decision, i dont like or understand it but i wont complain anymore.
| 0 |
A lot of the history i have been adding Unfortunatly has not been written about a lot of it was part of my own personal research. The Latino history of Oakland has been ignored by Historians so very little is written about it. but what i have added is very true and is just as much a part of Oakland's history so i'm sorry if i don't have links to articles written about this history but i will look for some so you Racist can stop erasing what i write.
| 0 |
"
I did a Google Books search as well, but I think the higher hit count for ""quadrotor"" is an algorithmic anomaly. The number on the first page is an estimate; the one on the last page is more accurate. If you go to the last page of hits for each term, what do you find? Usually the numbers will adjust somewhat. I found that ""quadrotor"" actually ended up lower than ""quadcopter"", despite initially showing thousands. Are you able to reproduce that effect? "
| 0 |
"
Your edits
Your editing has become disruptive. Please make an attempt to help us with article content or maintenance tasks. If you continue the pattern you have established it will jeopardize your editing privilege. '''rolls''' "
| 0 |
National Playing Fields Association
Just thought you might like to see how, with the help of the NPFA, the page has grown since your initial creation. I'm sure there is still far more to do.
| 0 |
I'm not an English major, just interested in aviation history. The page is open to anyone to edit, spell-check, and append as information as it becomes available, such as the proper name, make and model of this concept, which will probably be announced sometime in the future. Please make whatever correction you feel appropriate, and cite why you do it. If anyone has issues with why you are doing it, bring it up for discussion and consensus. Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Naming has some guidelines.
| 0 |
"
Osli, pls refrain from aggressive actions as removing sourced parts as in Naser Orić article or articles related to Srebrenica genocide. I showed what you did, so it is not about my language, it is about explaining your actions which are in my opinion not correct, because first you removed sourced part, then you said that you didn't do it, when I proved it to you, you accussed me of ""aggressive language"". Regards. "
| 0 |
Cool man, just cool!
| 0 |
Thanks very much! Your response lead me to Pseudovector which contains a nice example similar to this one.
| 0 |
That's because they are brothers. Tarantino said They were.
| 0 |
Recommend you stop your vandalism.
| 0 |
Reyna
Please wait until the official retirement announcement (scheduled for July 16) before adding those details to his article. We don't jump to conclusions on future events, per WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks.
| 0 |
Oh look more threats and he outright misrepresents the situation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Talk:Phyllis_Schlafly:
| 0 |
Unprotect my page
I am off my block and therefore am able to have my page unprotected, before you claimed i was abusing the unblock request. While we may have opposing views, I still feel i am able to have this done. With all due respect,
| 0 |
"
Max Semenik, oh man, I really don't want to lose the ability to edit this page. So could you please clarify exactly what you mean by insults? For example...I don't think that your response to my concern was reasonable...so would it be an insult if I said that your response was unreasonable? What if you burned a book...would it be an insult if I referred to you as a book burner?
When I looked over the Wikipedia entry on personal attacks...it states that comments ""should be directed at content and actions rather than people."" Referring to somebody as a book burner clearly is directed at content (books) and actions (burning) rather than the person. It's not a matter of who they are...it's a matter of what they are doing.
In my situation...I've simply described the actions of these two editors in terms of how it relates to the content. It's one thing if you were to argue that my description of their behavior was inaccurate...but that's not what you did....you simply said that I had insulted them.
What would I have to gain from insulting them? I'm a really reasonable guy. I absolutely love reason...I respond really well to it. Are you a reasonable person? If so, then please share the precise reasoning behind your decision to deny my request to be unblocked. What would really help is if you could copy and paste exactly which rules/regulations that I've violated. I've looked over both the entry on personal attacks and the entry on harassment and can find nothing that specifically matches my own actions. "
| 0 |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxvO_Z0bFmI
What is the take on this?
| 0 |
"
You don't get to ""disinvite"" people from editing ""your"" user talk page
This isn't your personal website. The purpose of a user talk page is to facilitate public discourse about a particular user. It's not your personal property. In the future, you may want to reconsider making statements to the contrary."
| 0 |
, but I think we both know your real reason for doing this
| 0 |
can you mention to me what were the ethnic slurs i used? the other time i called someone a thief for his propagandistic POV pushing, that's why my block was perfectly justified. but now what did i say that is called an ethnic slur?
| 0 |
I don't not care to edit about the stupid beliefs. I do wish to edit about how the topic is defined. Public psyche etc. kernel of truth. nothing more. There has to be some common consensus here between skeptics. I see we do have some common interests. Thanks
| 0 |
vandalize wiki by deleting everything even if I don't know nothing about that particular subject.
Action makes reaction.
| 0 |
the page in question.
| 0 |
Ok, thank you! I thought it was something like that! Yeah, I think it is a fake name. I don't know if you know the movie, but you maybe know the book writen by André Brink? �
| 0 |
Wikipedia has a rule ignore all rules. First read it very carefully. It is necessary in case of useful information.
| 0 |
"
More To Benjiboi
You wrote on the Sanchez article discussion thread:
For those looking for the information, Sanchez apparently used to place ads as ""Excellent Top"" and he a related website http://excellent-top.com/, the access which has since been blocked by the site owner. This is likely the same ad referenced in the Colmes interview and comparing information from the porn site before it was removed unearthed some pretty compelling information but I'm not sure if it warrants much research but it matches information to a Matt Ayala Sanchez with the same birthdate. So might be worth including if reliable sources confirm.
This is incorrect. Sanchez ran Excellent-Top from 1999 to 2002. Then he went into business as ""No Regrets Massage"" in New York. The phone number from the ""No Regrets Massage"" ads, which ran in the New York Blade for most of 2004, is where Alan Colmes contacted Sanchez. My partner reached him at the same number. All of this is detailed on my partner's website, which was termed a ""hate site"" by Elonka and the other senior Wikipedia administrators and editors because it called Sanchez a fool.
My partner thinks Sanchez is a fool, and said so. I agree with my partner, and more. Having an opinion about a set of facts does not invalidate the facts. There is no need for you to reinvent the wheel. All the facts are at that website. Sanchez knows it, and so do the powers-that-be at Wikipedia. They are determined to keep those facts out of the article and drive away anyone who brings them to light, no matter what Wikipedia's rules might say to the contrary. "
| 0 |
"
""On articles about topics with many fansites, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate, marking the link as such."" It never says that fan sits are not acceptable. And the TV project page says that a few fansite links are appropriate. And the clear precedent is toward inclusion, as every other TV show page attests to. "
| 0 |
Also, I am not sure how accurate the current map is. It doesn't include Ottawa, or Niagara as part of the core area, yet shows small towns in Quebec in the core area. It also does not give a description of what the colors mean to the readers.
| 0 |
Thanks
For reverting vandalism to my user page.
| 0 |
"
Lyrics
I see you're removing a bunch of links to song lyrics. What evidence do you have that they are copyright violations?
Same question as above, what's up with this? Although not allowed on wikipedia, the fair use rational is pretty established for lyric sites, and having a link is pretty benificial to these articles. Let me know what's up... -rex
This was discussed here, and fair use is not established for lyric sites. None of those sites are authorized by the copyright holders (just go there and look for their copyright notices), and many of them are profiting from their copyright violations through ads. See this site, the MPA or the BBC for more information. Ideally, all those links should be replaced with links to the lyrics page on the musician/band's official website. (Talk)
I forgot to cite WP:EL:
A page that violates the copyrights of others per contributors' rights and obligations. Sites which fail to provide licensing information or to respond to requests for licensing information should not be used. (Knowingly and intentionally directing others to a site that violates copyright has been considered a form of contributory infringement in the United States.).
(Talk)
I'm not sure I trust the MPA on this one... -rex
Of course I don't agree with the MPA, but this is not a good reason to violate WP:EL (or the current copyright laws). If readers want to see the lyrics, and we can't link to them, they can still use Google. It's not that difficult. (Talk)
I see it more as a reason to change WP:EL then -rex
Then I suggest that you make a proposal at Wikipedia talk:External links. (Talk)
Mushroom, I tend to agree that lyrics and links to lyrics sites should be removed from articles; however, it seems excessive to remove them from users' comments on talk pages. In two cases, I had actually been using azlyrics for this quote:
United States Copyright Law provides the copyright owner and/or their representative with the exclusive right to create, reproduce and distribute derivative works based on copyrighted material. Unless you have received permission from the copyright owner or their representative to distribute the lyrics from their songs, you are in violation of the law.
May 2003 - Azlyrics.com Team was contacted by one of the world's largest music print publisher ""Hal Leonard Corporation"", who exclusively control print rights for more than 6000 of the compositions listed on our website. Publisher demand us to cease and desist from offering these unauthorized lyrics for distribution via our website.
We had no choice but to remove all these lyrics from our site, otherwise AZLyrics.com would be closed.
As you can see, this actually supports your case. Assuming you simply failed to read what I wrote, I reverted both of your changes.
In this case, I didn't revert; however, I would urge you to do so yourself. Talk pages are not part of the encyclopedic content, and don't have to adhere to the same guidelines as articles do.
Thanks for taking this task upon yourself, but please keep in mind that this issue is shadowy, not at all black-and-white. cιτγ
I actually read what you wrote (I even visited the site and read the paragraph you quoted), and I decided to remove the link anyway, because I think those sites should not get any traffic from Wikipedia. I agree that in this case the removal was not justified, since you were linking to a non-copyvio page, but I won't revert my edits to other talk pages. As WP:EL says, ''""knowingly and intentionally direct
| 0 |
Unspecified source for Image:HaleAndPaceCat.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HaleAndPaceCat.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Talk
| 0 |
"
Heh, which drama? I'm tracking about five right now (Email me if you don't want to say which one here). (talk) "
| 0 |
"
Facts
The Kincaid Family originated ALL-OVER Europe. It is generally believed that the Kincaid Family was founded byu Sir William Galbraith, who was granted the lands of Kincaid by King Robert thr Bruce upon William's marriage to an unknown Princess, whom was the daughter of John Comyn III, the ""Black Comyn."" MOST Genealogists agree that this occured, since that is what the documentation support leads to. This unknown Princess was a descendant of Emperor Charlemagne as well as various rulers of Scotland, including David I of Scotland.
I believe that this information should be merged into the article. I just wanted to get comment before I do so. I will add th information in three (3) days. Thank you! "
| 0 |
, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Save the Davidson Page
If it seems like a viable fight, help save the content of the Hilliard Davidson High School Wikipedia page.
You say that as if it is in danger of deletion - it is not. There is just a lot of content that violates our policies and guidelines. violet/riga (t) 17:23
| 0 |
Alright, and also
I want to make Mileena a disambiguation page (ity's a legitimate name after all) and move her article to Mileena (Mortal Kombat) per norm, but I'm not sure how to do this. Could you help me out and do this?
| 0 |
A name change seems a little premature - this article has suddenly gained quite a few editors, and ought to be allowed to mature for a moment or two. I think we've already had enough fun at AfD for now, and can focus on improving this article.
| 0 |
"
If it's help you, I'm looking specifcally for info on what led the author to create the series (or any thing related to its conception/production) or about the manga/anime impact in ""real world"". Basically, info what I could use to create a ""Production"" section and expand ""Reception"", even if it's only a bit. "
| 0 |
http://www.google.co.in/webhp?rlz=1C1RNHN_enIN478IN478&sourceid;=chrome-instant&ie;=UTF-8#hl=en&rlz;=1C1RNHN_enIN478IN478&tbm;=bks&sclient;=psy-ab&q;=%22Military+Circles+in+Washington+concluded%2C+on+the+basis+of+post-war+information%2C+that+Pakistan+lost+200+tanks%2C+with+another+150+put+of+action+but+recoverable&oq;=%22Military+Circles+in+Washington+concluded%2C+on+the+basis+of+post-war+information%2C+that+Pakistan+lost+200+tanks%2C+with+another+150+put+of+action+but+recoverable&gs;_l=serp.3...20464.20464.0.20677.1.1.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.1...1c.JX8TkVIiROM&pbx;=1&bav;=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp;=79f5683b01ec3981&biw;=1280&bih;=629
200 tanks were destroyed but the fact that US sources are biased as they dont give figures that some 115 pakistani tanks were captured in good condition by Indian army hence its clear that Pakistani losses are above 300 tanks , indian loss dont exceed 150-200tanks(when damaged tanks are included).
| 0 |
Will you stop calling me KL or I'll annoy you like a bat hearing sonic sounds. User:Puncharoo Read my page first
| 0 |
Hey there guys
This is my talk page. Leave any comments/questions/concerns about my editing or where you think I can help with editing. I will respond to your remarks here on my talk page as well as on your own. I reply on your talk pages so that I know you got my message, and I reply here on my own so I remember who I have replied to.
| 0 |
"
Shame
This user is extremely shameful. (I have signed my message)
"
| 0 |
The article should be unprotected on 25 October . After the article published on Le Monde newspaper , it's been recalled on the French talk page that hiding specific dimensions of a topic is considered WP:POV . The current montage doesn't even show the actual city, only a collection of lifeless landmarks close-ups. For the matter, this has raised enough concerns in France for the story to be also mentioned on a major radio, Europe 1 . This is why, I believe the better way to calm things out is to go for the conservative option which is to use the same image in the English version than the one used in the French version. An image which is a good consensus as it does show the Eiffel Tower, the undisputed symbol of the city, but also its urban surrounding landscape and its full dimension as a metropolis. That's the only way in my humble opinion to reach WP:NPOV in this case.
| 0 |
It should be noted that Matt Buck is also an anti-Semite, and he supports the neo-Nazi Carlos Latuff in his attempt to use Commons as his personal file-hosting site.
| 0 |
Recommend disolving Miraculous births article
There has been fraud here, which was calculated to give the appearance that Miraculous births had all the same information as Virgin birth (mythology) before the merge. Unless there is some Wikipedia rule that allows everyone to overlook this outrage, I suggest this article by its false history and its pretense of independence, all calculated to force an outcome favored by the perpetrators, forfeits its right to exist at the expense of Virgin birth (mythology).
| 0 |
NoticeTABThis user is new to Wikipedia. Please assume good faith, remain civil, and be calm, patient, helpful, and polite while he/she gets accustomed to Wikipedia and its intricacies.
| 0 |
|thumb|A shaven human scrotum, which contains the testicles.
| 0 |
Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Re: George Crockett, I didn't realize you were continuing to edit. I only noticed the malformed image link and the extremely short sections. Cheers. ≠ wiser
| 0 |
Thanks to you both. ) I am (knock wood) out of this episode and very grateful that I don't have them as often as I used to! Someday maybe I'll be smart enough to get off the computer at onset, but I tend to cling to the hope that it'll be minor until it's obvious...and too late. / (talk)
| 0 |
Hey Bags! Are you following me? LOL
| 0 |
"
Your use of rollback on American Civil War
Was that a mistake? You shouldn't use rollback for those kinds of edits... (talk) "
| 0 |
"
Sanitizing controversies section not acceptable
Ferengi, or Salegi, or wikimanone, or whatever you're called now, you had no business reverting most of the controversies section to begin with. speak!
If you want to clean up a biased article, go work on Crisis pregnancy center. speak!
I refer you, Kentipo, to WP:CIVIL, WP:UNDUE and note that you have had past wars of this type, including a 3RR. Look, if something is as controversial as this then it is always better to seek consensus before publishing in the article because otherwise someone may really overstep the mark and land WP in trouble. I am aware that much of what is going back and forth is verifiable but the tone is extremely POV and it is a worrying trend. It needs more civil discussion, less name-calling and moe WP:AGF on all sides.
I agree, I would like to clean up the Crisis pregnancy center article as well, it is extremely WP:POV in lending CPCs any credibility at all. I agree with Sitush, we need to build consensus before unilaterally adding content that is extremely POV which I removed. The ""stings"" may merit mention, but if so they need to be properly written to avoid POV, so lets use WP:CIVIL and discuss how to improve this article reasonably and assuming WP:GOOD FAITH in the discussion above. WikiOne
I have no issue with mentioning the stings, perhaps in a sentence or two for ALL of them (and not several paragraphs for the various stunts they have pulled) to illustrate that there have been some flash in the pan fusses that did not uncover any actual crimes (at lease based on reliable sources). We just don't need to have all of this detail, especially since the sources (meaning the fringe groups) are selective in what they share to support their agendas. "
| 0 |
Hi!
Wow, that message took me by surprice, a pleasent one! Thanks for your encorangement )
Regarding 9/11, i have also tried to make the pages more NPOV, but its seems prety hard. Try reading the talk page of the 9/11 attacks, i have been trying since archive 13 (?), and even wrote People questioning the 9/11 Commission Report after geting tired of people calling the 9/11 truth movement as insignificant in size. Peace!
| 0 |
Well i was not saying that i WILL do it DangerousPanda , i just gave an example with the opposite roles to make it more understandable , so in essence i claimed WP:MEAT between Dr.K and alexikoua >
Alexikoua
Dr.K
And then in the Fan noli article ( and i can give much much more examples ). However if you think that i am not in the right here i rest my case ( i understand that the majority makes the facts and not how well it is sourced , thats how it is in real life so that is how it should be in wikipedia as well ) . Regards ,
| 0 |
Are you kidding me?
you erased everything I wrote without any basis
what i wrote was all factual
thats not cool man
| 0 |
Indef block
I believe you got a bum deal and should not give up. The admin cited a preponderance of evidence without stating at all what that evidence was. The CU is not mentioned regarding you and Minusjason, so that is not it, otherwise it would have been mentioned. Admins can be a high handed bunch, and they most likely blocked you for your incivility. They will not admit to it, but dislike of your vocal objections hardly will make any of them feel obliged. I would appeal and ask for a detailing of what evidence was regarded as compelling. If it's the similarities in edits, then their argument is weak, very weak. It is reasonable to assume that two different editors would agree and make similar edits. Unfortunately, there is a star chamber quality, meaning a huge lack of transparency involved, to how these judgements are issued, and they will not feel an obligation to explain themselves, and no admin can demand a better rational for how the block was decided. If you appeal, you will need to deal with the fact finding process, and leave out how idiotic admins can be at times, however obvious this may seem.
| 0 |
No problem, we all make mistakes and it's all part of learning about Wiki (I'm still learning myself and they've gone and made me an admin!).
| 0 |
You have NOT heeded your last warning. A Block of this ip is in progress. Have a nice day )
| 0 |
"
That source is a forum post, made by ""Marina Lobova"", who is apparently ""Marina Alexandrovna Lobova"". According to Shipov's page, she is the Vice President of the ""Thai Russian Association of Technology and Economic Development"" . This association has 3 hits in google, 2 are for Shipov's page and 1 is for her bio in a russian page we can see that she CEO of UVITOR ""Universal Vacuum and Torsion Solutions"" and member of a company that is about ""Quantum Medicine, Nanotechnology"". This suggest a strong conflict of interest in making torsion field look good, and to make fringe stuff look better. This doesn't look like a reliable source by wikipedia standards.
"
| 0 |
Done and linked...
| 0 |
"
Yes, completely right. But in the article it never says ""Bush's small intellectual capacity has been satirized..."". I think people making that change are mistakenly assuming something like that. "
| 0 |
I think you're being unfair to him Marshal on that point and to be honest, given you wrote the lede it does kind of undermines the defence I made of you. Whilst I agree with you this was a football article and its a overly broad interpretation of your ban, you need to write your own appeal per WP:GAB. When I appealed mistakenly on your behalf I think I made the basis of a case for a block review. You need to write an appeal for yourself in your own words. I'd offer to help but at this point wonder if I would make it worse. talk
| 0 |
January 2007 (UTC)
I forwarded my discussion with the admin of the website. 01:31, 3
| 0 |
98.217.61.141|98.217.61.141]] 18:06, 31 October
| 0 |
"
Winkelvi
Looks like our colleague Winkelvi is at AN/I again...I think third time this month. I only came across it reading of a friend's matter at AN/I today and notice it with a look ""yeah, him again"". It seems the repeating pattern is he obsesses over things in the news, celebrities, dead people, and then edit wars with similarly curious people over those current events. How many times does one get to edit war with impunity...I think we should wager on how long it'll go on for? Two pints of cask ale says 15 October or another four AN/I draggings before someone has enough of him and he's blocked for it. Until then, I have upcoming GAs to write. "
| 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Kurdistan Democratic Party/North
| 0 |
It also seems bizarre that you discount my experience as a private individual with TVL, yet are prepared to champion the experience of another private individual, i.e. the author of the website in question. The bottom line is that the latter has clearly chosen not to co-operate with TVL in any way, which is of course their right, but their subsequent experience is entirely a result of that choice.
| 0 |
I've seen that threat at the start of DVDs, with no distinction made between uploads and downloads. It may very well be that they only prosecute uploads, but I'm also opposed to having overly strict laws and leaving it up to the authorities to decide who to prosecute, as this gives them too much power over us. I think I will add this to the list.
| 0 |
"
Yeah, WP:COLOR isn't going to be enforced against a userbox located in userspace which will never, ever be used in an article, when it is meant to apply to articles and article navigation templates, but thanks for playing. I will entertain no further discussion on this subject now. My final suggestion to you is that if you do not like my userbox, do what I did: learn to create your own, because there is nothing that says you have to use mine! SquadronRaven "
| 0 |
"::Natianal Socialism was just a political movement, like Republican. It only became a ""crime"" when the Germans lost the war. Imagine if US lost a war to someone, and being a Democrat made you a ""war criminal"". This is basically the situation thanks to the heebs.
"
| 0 |
Application of the UN Charter to the Iraq Liberation Act is original research. 19:09, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
| 0 |
Your persistent addition to this article is unsourced, meaning that you provide no reliable external references to confirm that it is true. Given that the text you are adding is not widely agreed to be correct, please discuss on the Talkpage whether it is appropriate material for the article before adding it again. (WJB talk)
| 0 |
yet another Anti fair use nazi
Listen, pal. People spend alot of time and effort to contribute original photographs to Wikipedia and we don't need people like you going around and destroying this work. The photographs I have taken and carefully uploaded as copyrighted/FU because they are statues, are not replaceable, no matter what you say, so please stop wasting everyone's time with your misguided campaign against fair use photographs.
| 0 |
this IP is from the Chicago Public Library it could be from anyone on wi-fi or public terminals here. probably not safe to block the IP, maybe just watch its contributions.
| 0 |
No, listen to ME. You are biased, because you only show one side of the argument, and make no attempt to show the evidence that I have given for my innocence. You are biased. Goodbye. ( )
| 0 |
There is an ongoing edit war on XBRLS. Anonymous 155.201.35.68 user edited all refernces to XBRLS without stating any reasons for doing so.
| 0 |
Hey have you watched this movie called the 2 Idiots - it is the latest to hit Wikiwood. Please make sure you do. If you wanna copy I can send it over Ok back to business. Samaleks - Does Google Maps let you fly to the airport from the railway station or did you take the rail track and then jump off at the Amaizhanjan Sewer? Please clarify? Lower Fourth - I am talking about the distance from the Ramp on the hospital side to the Drop Off / Pick Up points or rather Departure / Arrival entrances. It is 1Km and a bit more. Please visit and see for yourself. Make sure you don't go on feet coz when I last heard you needed an Odometer to measure distances on roads. Pls try it out and let us know the distance. Have a great evening - MountainWhiskey
| 0 |
"
I think the apple pie image is pretty dated. The expression ""as American as apple pie"" is dated and baseball's no longer the most popular sport in the US (football is). Plus, it's sort of weird having them on the flag. talk-contribs "
| 0 |
I prefer a view of the sea which I have during the summer as you can see here.
| 0 |
I didn't, I simply merged it in with the entry about aphids. There are a lot of creatures that have symbiotic relationships with ants, so that only the very most notable should be listed, except maybe on a second page.
| 0 |
It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from . Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. (Talk Page) (Contribs)
| 0 |
"
I respectfully disagree with your reading of the sources, your interpretations of WP:V/WP:RS and your use of the phrase edit warrior. Moreover, your remark Have you even bothered to read the material the site is referencing? doesn't seem civil to me (to answer you though, I have thoroughly read the referenced sources, many times). I reverted your first edit because it was clearly a wide misreading of the sources. I reverted your second edit (your revert) because you had wholly ignored both my request that you take your concerns to the talk page, along with the mistake you made in referring to one of the sources.
As for Your own source, it is not ""my own"" source. As for ""clearly states there is no motive or evidence, the source also says Gibson probably did murder Taylor. As to your wording This is speculation and theory, I'm not aware of any speculation or theory in the article narrative, which describes what reliable sources say about what happened, the suspects, Gibson's later dying confession and the officially unsolved state of the murder.
As to your use of the phrase calm down'', please do not try to speculate on or characterize my emotional state, thanks. "
| 0 |
"
Now it's even worse! How do you want it, show me an idea and I'll see. jan→ "
| 0 |
See in particular.
| 0 |
"
Category ""Former Towns of RSK 1991-95""
Can you please check this matter out and cast a vote. The link for the actual category is here and the discussion and voting is taking place here. Thanks. "
| 0 |
"
I'm not going to revert your last edits; however, there are some things that I want to point out:
It doesn't matter whether this band is an ""extraordinary case"" or not. These need still a source and Rate My Music (and similar user-operated websites) have zero validity as a source. What you are doing now is adding genres according to your original research and your point is mostly based on this. Also whether another band page has sourced genres or not is not relevant; this must be necessary, especially for this sort of controversial articles.
If you have any objections against the guideline, then you may open a discussion on the talk pages. However, you are currently doing whatever you desire and disregard every set of rule. I understand that you're doing this for the article's good and indeed the rules can be breakable if necessary. However, I am really baffled at your persistence on keeping the genres without any discussion or consensus, even after this amount of controversy it has generated.
I don't really think having around 65 genres on the infobox (without any sort of necessary prose or explanation in the article body) would be useful at all, especially for the readers.
And yes, you are right. You are definitely editing the page with a fan's perspective. "
| 0 |
"
Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! "
| 0 |
Hello
da:Grad (vinkel)
de:Grad
en:Degree (disambiguation)
es:Grado
fr:Degré (homonymie)
hu:Fok
it:Grado
ja:度
simple:Degree
| 0 |
PT version
Please, check portuguese version: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opera%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Chumbo_Fundido
| 0 |
}}Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for spamming
| 0 |
", 11 April 2008 (UTC)
and igff the bearers simply let it go, there'd be no violence...
That sounds almost like the Tibetan government-in-exile's claim that ""violence to a Tibetan is killing someone; if you don't kill them, and only beat them up, and they run away, it's not violence"" (I'm paraphrasing, but the exact quote is in 2008 Tibetan unrest.) but you'd probably resent that comparison.
Let's try an almost exact analogy: ""The robbery victim should have just divvied up all the cash to the robber. If she'd just let go, there wouldn't have been any violence"". Or: ""Britain should have just surrendered. If they had just let go of their country, there wouldn't have been a war"". What's wrong is wrong is wrong. A person has the right to defend their person and legally obtained possession, and you can't justify crime (not including political crimes) or violence against a civilian by a political cause.
Yes, the flame attendants themselves are idiots, too, and they are ""thugs"" when they are pushing the British olympic chief. But they are within their rights as far as violent criminals are concerned. What do you expect them to do? ""simply let it go so there'd be no violence""? (Talk) 02:33"
| 0 |
Smells like clever disinformation . The guy quotes his own original research alleging phone conversations and interviews that are not published anywhere by an independent sources.
| 0 |
Nastel Article ==
Hi Airplaneman,
Thanks for the welcome on the Nastel article. I am responding to your comment about appropriate license for the image I placed in the company box. I wasn't sure what license to specify. The image is owned by Nastel Technologies. It was created by their art department. I am an employee of Nastel Technologies and have full permission to place this image in the article. What license type should I specify? Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Charley
==
| 0 |
So now we are resorting to calling King David a bandit, are we? That description actually more aptly fits Mohammed, who looted Mecca and massacred its Jewish population.
| 0 |
It's me, 67.68.39.194, under a new ISP and IP again. That's what I've heard. The hotel thing is just a rumour right now, but he has given eviction notice to the residents, as some weren't paying lot fees, and if they don't vacate in a certain time period, he's demolishing everything regardless. 24.226.21.207
| 0 |
Do you actually believe in such a fairy tale? The guy has been living in the US for half of his life and he doesn't have a US citizenship? Cmon, use your common sense. Do you actually believe he's been applying for his green card over and over? It would be much easier if he had owned any companies in the US and didn't he own half of the Coyotes?
| 0 |
My ten favorite people are my wife, our four children, and our five grandchildren.
| 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.