text
stringlengths 1
29.3k
⌀ | label
float64 0
1
|
|---|---|
As per advice from several relevant authorities, I have deleted the offending paragraph in the Temple Lot article, and the identical one at 'Church of Christ Temple Lot.' I am not doing this as an amateur Wikipedia editor, but as the private citizen who is being 'outed' and defamed in two Wikipedia articles (so far). I have been advised to delete the offending passage, and then wait and see who exactly restores it. That person (unless it is a SmackBot, an automatic revert), will in turn be 'outed' and 'named' as the subject of a criminal investigation. Yes, this is a 'legal threat,' and I don't appreciate various inept Wikipedia administrators threatening me in order to dissuade me from complaining to law enforcement about a crime which is being committed: the willful invasion of privacy, and defamation of a U.S. Citizen, in contravention to numerous local, state, and federal laws, as well as in contravention to numerous strict and explicit Wikipedia policies regarding inclusion of a person's name in a Wikipedia article. The following excerpt is just one example of Wikipedia guidelines which have been willfully, persistently and openly ignored and defied by Wikipedia editor after Wikipedia editor. Again...whoever restores the defamatory passage which includes my nameor ANY paragraph, sentence or article which includes my namewill be investigated and [hopefully] prosecuted for doing so. In other words, I WILL PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES against the perpetrator.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BLP#Privacy_of_names
Privacy of names
Caution should be applied when naming individuals who are discussed primarily in terms of a single event. When the name of a private individual has not been widely disseminated or has been intentionally concealed (such as in certain court cases), it is often preferable to omit it, especially when doing so does not result in a significant loss of context. When evaluating the inclusion or removal of names, their publication in secondary sources other than news media, such as scholarly journals or the work of recognized experts, should be afforded greater weight than the brief appearance of names in news stories.
Editors should take particular care when considering whether inclusion of the names of private, living individuals who are not directly involved in an article's topic adds significant value. The presumption in favor of the privacy of family members of articles' subjects and other loosely involved persons without independent notability is correspondingly stronger.
| 0 |
Well, glad someone appreciates the joke ) thanks.
| 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Audenshaw Junction rail accident
| 0 |
Good work on the Bupropion page.
| 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Pigeon Forge Police Department
| 0 |
"
How about, instead of trashing theories or ideologies you fear, you offer evidence that would contradict statements you disagree with? Your 'refutation' contains no factual evidence to contradict the original statement. Do you believe that children do not play non-competitive games in any culture, or just not in Semai culture? Or that non-competitive games do not or cannot exist? Or that it's unlikely or impossible that Semai children would play only non-competitive games? When you say that an author of an article in this encyclopedia ought to ""present all sides of the story,"" were there particular other pieces of information or other theories that you thought should be presented?
"
| 0 |
"
Gosh, I'm impressed with your diligence I had forgotten about leaving this message!
The good news is, I quickly moved on from that page and sought other projects. The bad news is, I subsequently discovered (as you've described) that many policy pages get ""'occupied' permanently by a few editorial 'authorities'."" Between June and August, I made many many hours-long ""improvements"" to policy pages which were quickly reverted. It was very demoralizing, and now I only edit in the article space.
I think the best (i.e. most altruistic) account for this phenomenon came from User:SlimVirgin, who suggested that longtime editors often grow to rely on the verbatim text of policies, because (for example) they find it useful to quote the text in disputes with newbies. So that's a legitimate reason why policy pages can become so darn resistant to improvements.
I was saddened to see that policy pages are afflicted by chronic sclerosis, but I consider it a learning experience, and I've happily returned to adding material to the article space.
Cheers, talk/WP:Hornbook "
| 0 |
but you didn't uphold... you too made errors. Stop harping on civility; I'm not accusing you of a breach of honor or anything like that, merely human failings to which we are all susceptible, neophytes especially.
| 0 |
Both song are rotting are brain cells.
Lyrics:
7 am waking up in the morning gotta get fresh gotta go down stairs gotta have my
bowl gotta ceral ticking on on everybody rushing
| 0 |
There's been more disruptive editing @ Denis Tsargush by both of the IP addresses above, as well as 72.236.192.238, which also has a history of disruptive edits and bans. Looks to me like it's time for a liberal imposition of bans, but I leave it to your judgement. Regards
| 0 |
Another item: Seems that Fecal coliform bacteria could/should redirect to E. coli. As this would be the first redirect that I edit, I am throwing up a flag. Occurs to me that after a redirect, another more learned user can undo it, so it is alright to be bold here.
| 0 |
Blocked again
You have been blocked for your continued violations of Wikipedia image copyright and fair-use policies. As you are clearly unwilling or unable to provide the necessary information on the images you upload, please refrain from uploading any more once your block expires. Your continued violations are placing Wikipedia in legal jeopardy and will not be allowed to continue.
| 0 |
Your submission at Articles for creation
Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruno Mars was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!
| 0 |
|listas = Henke, Brad William
| 0 |
lack of real educational value
| 0 |
The image has a known source and it's verifiable. In my opinion neither picture is good enough, but I stand by what I said in my previous comment. I'll try to find a personally-taken picture of herself my safe, and it can be up for discussion. April 7th 2009, 21:17 (EET)
| 0 |
Wow you guys are really smart..... But i wish you were smart enough to take this argument to the Cell proccessor page though.
| 0 |
shouldn't that money get used for the public good?
| 0 |
(who was actually naturalized french too, but for the purposes of those mosaics I'd certainly consider him to be just russian
| 0 |
If a living person from Illinois had been validated then there would be no debate. But since there isn't we have to deal with claims. Mildred Larson was claimed to be the 2nd oldest in Illinois. Rosa Wilkes claims to be older and therefore (logically) the oldest Illinoisan. If citations required names and rankings then deductive reasoning would be defunct. Whether or not her claim is true, or the citation correct, isn't the point (verifiability over truth). But if you have reason to believe that she was born in 1905 then, rather than creating arguments, you only have to say and I'll let the matter lie. 212.183.134.130
| 0 |
Women aren't supposed to fight on the front lines in a war.
9:21 PM EST
| 0 |
I'm sure, Proabivouac, that you have read the page. You will know then, that Southphilly's reverts here and here are against consensus. Maybe you can do something? (Have a nice day!)
| 0 |
And yes, this is the Loganberry you think it is. =:) (Talk)
| 0 |
professional typesetters = geeks. is it because of the fact that wikipedia is a web thing that we should use more IT-talk here? the main field in which this is used is linguistics, not IT. Use the proper academic term, not the IT neologism, ok? ackoz
| 0 |
I thought the issue had been settled. The issue had been stable for more than two years, but TreasuryTag amended to 19 without explanation. The BBC article states 19, but is either in error, or includes the NI Prime Minister.
| 0 |
As u can see, Fnagaton likes to shout, sometimes that no arguments were made and sometimes that the arguments were weak and rubutted. I am not going to bother to waste the time and space in this forum. He and GregL have imposed there will by shouting down any debate and so it is either binding arbitration or I find a set of editors who can shout louder.
| 0 |
by the Roman Catholic Church
| 0 |
Oh, am I the first to mention this? And it has come to pass.
| 0 |
See what I have written about CREB here and related references:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nuklear/SNDRI#CREB
| 0 |
Re: Edit to Church of Wiki
I was merely trying to make this website more relevant. Things that do not have a place in wiki such as articles for the sake of humor should not be posted.
Please delete the article at your soonest convienance.
| 0 |
"
I've left a note. Hopefully it'll have the same effect as last time! ☄ "
| 0 |
September 2010
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Adaikkammai Appathal Padaippu Veedu Nachandupatti, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. '''' contributions talk
| 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:William Walton (rugby)
| 0 |
23:39, Oct 2, 2004 (UTC)
| 0 |
"::::::could you point to me where in your estimation, i ""damaged"" the article? i did revert edits, but did this ""damaged"" the article itself? most anxious to find out.
"
| 0 |
"::::I think you are missing the poin here Wizardry_Dragon. We're not predicting the future here, the future is certain, it has been decided and there are numerous secondary sources that would agree with it including Financial Times and the Economist. These are reliable sources.
Just to put my point in context, if you look at the Demographics section of the USA here , the words ""If current immigration trends continue, the number of non-Hispanic whites is expected to be reduced to a plurality by 2040-2050"" represent prediction of future and as such should it also be removed?
It is in the interest of the general reader to know what the very imminent future holds for Kosovo. I will be reinstating the statement and I would ask the editors not to remove it.
"
| 0 |
Hey
It's your old pal, Hey Pee fundal with a trudge (I'm using a slightly different variant of my name since I worry that wikifilter will censor my real moniker). Prepare to be tormented! - 109.66.19.181
| 0 |
Wouldn't it be same as don't wikipedia for a week or I would block you? If there was an actual editing restriction, may I know where it was officially placed?
| 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Cinematography in Romania
| 0 |
There needs to be proper mention that Rowland has never been arrested. Also, police reports are not required to be released if no arrest has been made.
| 0 |
A new essay, Wikipedia:Merge what?, seems to speak well to this situation. 18:33, 27
| 0 |
". I am touched that this was never changed, even though ""Jamie Sabben-Clare"" would have fitted the same rhythm"
| 0 |
OK, I've just done another read-through of the Act article and nominated it for GAN. Next, I think I'm going to toddle over to the two sub-type articles (Kiger and Pryor Mustangs), with a goal of maybe nominating them by sometime next week? The main Mustang article is going to be a PITA, but, hey, we got TWH and Andalusian and a few other POV-draws to GA!! I've never been able to get myself too interested in flat racing...don't know why. I keep telling myself that this will be the year I finally get around to working on Endurance riding (my kind of racing) - that suite of articles is also in need of some major lovin'. Let me know if there are any articles that you're working on that you'd like me to take a run-through, though.
| 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:Japanese gunboat Uji (1903)
| 0 |
My RfA
Hi Winhunter,
I just wanted to say thanks for choosing not to give me an oppose.
As i'm sure you can appreciate i wasn't too happy with 8 Opposes (inc. 2 strongs) within an hour of nomination
just wanted to let you known it meant a lot
Thanks )|talk
| 0 |
I've marked File:My_Brother-2006.jpg as PD-self, but since you weren't the photographer for the others, I need confirmation that you've got permission from the photographers to release the images into the public domain. Under current copyright law, everything is copyrighted as soon as it's created. I think automatic copyright is the second-biggest mistake in copyright law (the biggest being the insanely long copyright terms), but it's the way things work.
| 0 |
"
""For any sane person, the latter is the biggest controversy related to the 2010 CWG."" – If you can find the sources that raise this point, then you are more than welcome to add this in the article. There's no need to insult those who are working hard to add reliable information and sources to this article. Our job is not to add our own POV. – "
| 0 |
"
You didnt have to put emphases on the ""No!"" thats not a statement. "
| 0 |
A tag has been placed on DAN SOUZA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
| 0 |
Does not appear that neither of you started accepting reading what others have to say. Let's post this for a review, and let's see how long your argument stands. How about proposing the same thing for articles such as Rome? Any of you got the balls to do that?
| 0 |
i am adding references PLEASE HELP ME WIKI i am being vandalized!!!
| 0 |
"
Hey thanks for addressing that merge! I knew it should probably go elsewhere...and just took the queue for the destination from the teen page. I'm a pageant-newbie, so excuse my misdirection on that puppy! Thanks much! †
Would it be better to redirect Miss New Jersey's Outstanding Teen, rather than deleting it? †
Good idea. Will do so myself. In fact, it may be worth redirecting the rest of them as well. Good teamwork sorting this one out... hadn't thought of redirecting ) Btw the State Pageants article itself is up for afd but judging from the discussion it's fairly likely to be kept... should be closing in the next couple of days.
Excellent! Wikipedia at it's best! Two editors working together as a team to make things better! I'll take a look a the AfD, and perhaps weigh in. Anytime you need help with anything, I'm always glad to assist a positive editor like yourself! Nice meeting you! † "
| 0 |
Not an unjust threat
Do not contribute to a topic unless you wish to contribute to it constructively. That is not an unjust thread. Perhaps if you would do research, you would be wrong less often. Thanks.
| 0 |
"
I see you have been experimenting with Wikipedia. Your change was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. guy "
| 0 |
I revert POV change against concensus.
| 0 |
SWaP Classic
Hi there. I took a look at the article you created and noted a few issues with it. If you could please resolve them in a timeley fasion that would be great. Currently I don't see the notability demonstrated so my feeling is that it should be removed. If you can provide more verifyable references that would be great.
| 0 |
"
Enid Blyton's Five Go Down to the Sea
I have just read this book. I read the 1953 version, the earliest I could find on amazon. I could find no evidence that anyone speaks Cornish in this book. The nearest character is Mr Penruthlan. He says things such as ""Oooh-ock"" (page 180), and the chidren find him difficult to understand. However, it is explained that he talks like this because he doesn't have his teeth in. When he has his teeth he is perfectly comprehensible in English. I wonder where the idea that some characters speak Cornish in this book."
| 0 |
Right up there with make believe universities, eh?
| 0 |
Prof. Mianagawa
What South Korea had to prove was to have acquired stronger title before the Shimane Prefecture incorporation. That is, Korea is necessary to prove that Korean title had substituted to the title by the effective occupation before it was incorporated by Shimane. However, the effective control by Korea has not been proven at all. The discussion such as not being possible to protest is meaningless if Korea cannot prove this.
Prof. Daijyudo
It is meaningless even if it is assumed that Korea was not able to protest after February, 1905. Because Korea did not do though it was able to control effectively before 1904. They did not manage the sea lions hanting.
Prof. Serita
Japan made the sea lion hanting a licence system. (SYC.) Peaceful effective control of Japan continued like this till WW2.
The judicial precedent that supports these insistences has been presented. And, does the judicial precedent that supports the insistence of a dipsy Korean scholer who cannot even the accurate quotation of the book? Thank you.
| 0 |
Air cooled radials
A recent addition uses this source to claim that the Heron head was invented by Gibson & Heron at the RAE in 1918. Now Heron is an uncommon name. I'd expect there to be some involvement, whether now or later. However I'm unconvinced that this Gibson-Heron head is at all related to the Heron head.
The Gibson-Heron head is a design for sealing the head of an air-cooled radial engine, so as to give good thermal transfer and thus avoid valve overheating.
The Heron head, as used by Jaguar, is a design for combustion chambers.
Is there really any overlap?
| 0 |
you are now banned?that sounds stupid indeed,lol banned for what, for saying what I think?free speech my friend, free speech,Megistias is a uneducated vandal, has changed everythink to a war page.
| 0 |
Oh, and I have a question. Why was the articl on Brad Christian, a famous magician, deleted because of vandalism instead of simply restored? I believe that many users on this site are biased towards magicians. I have come to the conclusion that wiki is a useless site that does nothing to help anyone. You are welcome to ban me longer, and I understand completely if you do, but this site is the worst piece of garbage I have ever found! Most sites comply to have exposure removed so that our art stays an art and not any person off the street can levitate. But this site and its Admin has some serious problems that they need to straighten out. As for the copyrighted material, i will be reporting it to the appropriate place and further action will be taken.
| 0 |
Organisation ==
This article starts as being about the concept creation myth but then branches up up into listing all known creation myths and actually simply telling them. So I'd say there needs to be a concise and possibly separate list List of creation myths (where the article actually was previously) with clear inclusion criteria and links.
==
| 0 |
"Hello Walter,
following the WQA opened by the above editor, I've determined that he is in the bad habit of rattling cages quite often. Some people he has had frictions with in the mere 26 days since he opened his account include, , , , and . Seems to be a regular pattern of accusing people of ""stalking"", ""harassment"", and ""personal attacks"" but does not appear to present himself in a particularly civil manner, from what I gather. The fact that he has opened up a dialogue with you, commencing with a rather aggressive ""Who the hell are you?"" seems to suggest that this guy is adversarial. The WQA shows he is not always willing to accept the truth either. I suspect that Erikeltic is also unwilling to drop the stick in terms of the SPI, ""Jake"", matter, as he too is still pursuing admin advice, fraught in seeing cowboy blocked, it would seem. Needless to say this is just some friendly advice, that Djathinkimacowboy seems a bit of a mud-slinger, so you might want to watch him carefully, in future, especially since you opposed his ""canvassing"" claims in the SPI, and his reaction is to treat everyone against him like a group conspiracy, then starts taking to several talk pages, which becomes harder to follow. Take care. Cheers, [Chat • RFF]
"
| 0 |
Uh, yeah you're right; the indef block seems a little harsh, if you ask me. I was just doin' some reference desk action and making what I believed to be a constructive recommendation to the AN/I douches. Admins have evolved into ruler-wielding hardasses to a greater degree than when I was active a few years ago. I guess I'll have to use another accont or go back to editing from my iPhone if I want to keep using the Reference Desk. ho-hum.
| 0 |
Mk5384 (It won't let me sign, for some reason.)
| 0 |
As further proof of uncollaborative editing by Eubulides, he has restored 1/2 of the strikeouts of his edits without sufficient justification. It should also be noted that the restored text was disagreed with my a majority of editors which provides more proof that Eubulides' edits and his intent is questionable. When a majority of editors talk through a point, justify their strikeout/concerns and it is restored by a single individual this is an example of paternalistic behaviour. All the points raised by myself and others concerning editor Eubulides with respect to his edits on the chiropractic article are indeed still playing out and hopefully other editors will see this trend and call him on it.
| 0 |
al-Mawardi
Thanks for good advice; Encyclopaedia of Islam contains very few articles on jurists, so I didn't really bother to look, but it does have one on Mawardi. On another note, I have unstubbed Battle of Khaybar, and I will really appreciate it if you could look at it. Talk
| 0 |
"
Attitude towards Christians
I have removed the opening sentence ""Tipu was widely reputed to be anti-Christian"". This is not found in the reference provided. Such a harsh, general statement as the opening sentence gives reader no further incentive to read the further paragraphs and is clearly a POV push. If Tipu had built a Christian church at the request of French, then should we also write that he was a Christian missionary? No I guess. Whisper "
| 0 |
April 2008
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
| 0 |
Oppose The Model 40 was a substantially changed plane.
| 0 |
I got it now thank you! It was the settings. It's fixed now ^_^.
| 0 |
Okey i fixed the article to be more realistic, i am waiting feedback from others
Waffa
| 0 |
2007 French Alps coach crash
After re-reading Wikipedia:Notability, I have come to the conclusion that I could still not construe an argument in favor of this article's inclusion, and have re-nominated it for deletion. I am sorry if the work you put into it must be lost, but there are plenty of more notable events to stub in List of road accidents (actually, if you could look into 2003 Merapoh bus tragedy, for which I couldn't find sources, I would be grateful), and this one just doesn't cut it.
| 0 |
Suggestion for 'Skeptical analysis'
It would be nice if someone could add this skeptical explanation of Ghost sightings to this article.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtml?xml=/connected/2002/11/06/ecfwitch06.xml
| 0 |
Whether Melbourne shopping centres do or don't look like Toronto ones isn't the point. The images I suggested show the reader what Melbourne looks like. This is an encyclopaedia not a tourist brochure. 03:00, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
| 0 |
"
Barnstar
Civility Award To Postpostmod, for maintaining a civil tone in adversity. ¤ [Talk]
All too often, I have seen minority-viewpoint editors become rude and aggressive when the consensus is clearly against them. Best wishes. ¤ [Talk] "
| 0 |
Apology
A message from my talk page:
I can see now. I was placing my personal feelings on a golden pedestal and making them the driver of my outbursts. Hell, i gnored the note of civility on the top of this very talk page. I know my actions were unwarranted, uncalled for and extremely immature. Lashing out won'y solve anything. This could be the insomnia talking, but i can see bright as day i'm in the wrong. And i regret my actions.
I apology, Hodson, for my truly unacceptable conduct. I allowed the hurt i felt months ago come back as bitter anger and made me blind to the real problem. I only hope, that, though you only see me as some 17-year old, you could see me as a 17-year old who wants to try and do all he can for Wikipedia. Will we be able to wipe the slate clean and move past this despicable part in our lives, and maybe emerge from this as collaborators, not squabblers. 12:51 16 January 2012 (UTC)
| 0 |
He he
Sorry boss. But you did say you wanted to annnnnnnnnoy timmmmmmmmmmmm. Do you really want to protect the TFA? I just had one up yesterday, and it was completely insane. But. But anyone can edit and all that. I think a lot of people learn that in practice for the first time on mainpage article.
| 0 |
a reedited (after 1885) version,
| 0 |
"
Hello
Sup you chodna gimp? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.177.171 "
| 0 |
This article did not seem to exist yet near as I could tell although it had multiple red links (over 20!). Since I am a railfan, and since I lived in the area for 10 years, it seemed fitting. I fetched an image from the Library of Congress to use for it. Should I have cropped that image to remove the HAER indexing and so forth??? Comments are very welcome, I am only an egg at article creation. ++
| 0 |
Thanks, Tan. Keep it real in WikiWorld.
| 0 |
You missed Dubai though, as they didnt bid. I guess I'll move it myself......
| 0 |
Verifiability of what? His letters are available and his work is widely distributed (in fact Science mentions as much) and they have been referred to extensively. Keep in mind that this is not a debate on Oreskes work, but on Oreskes life. Peiser's work on her essay, has had a profound impact - somebody looking to understand Oreskes' work and contributions would not have the benefit of a complete picture if we were to just ignore Peiser. I agree - it's not an issue of fact, it's an issue of relevance.
| 0 |
See Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment for a breakdown of the quality assessment metrics. -
| 0 |
Kristy wright was voted in the Top 100 sexy soap stars
| 0 |
Welp, thanks for explaining it anyway. 74.79.0.68
| 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:A. Piatt Andrew
| 0 |
Seriously - if you're going to make an accusation of libel against a living person, you must support that accusation with reliable sources.
| 0 |
Seems to be at it again, in force
| 0 |
You will notice, the first link in TheBee's complaint is to a page ON HIS OWN WEBSITE devoted to pointing out all the horrible things I'VE SAID TO HIM ON WIKIPEDIA - again it is complete with distorted explanations of what he claims happend. Is it OK with Wikipedia that an editor can be attacked on someone's personal website using dozens of links to Wikipedia's pages? That someone can have such a vendetta against a particular editor that they devote a webpage to disparaging that editor's participation at Wikipedia? If this is OK - what does this say to ALL editors here? Should people be expected to participate in an environment where this behavior is allowed? TheBee has, again, gone too far. This is like vandalizm to my Talk page - only this malicious activity is done safely on TheBee's website. Doesn't his activity take incivility to a new level? Why isn't HIS incivility at question here?
| 0 |
Speedway
Does anyone know where this was held? I cannot find it on the 1932 1:2500 maps.
| 0 |
Responce
I am JimJones005 and I just wanted to say that User:67.101.77.46 just coppied and pasted my warning of his(her?) vandalisim of the takeover article onto my user page. I don't know why editors insist on punishing people who make good faith edits to add to wikipedia with warnings and the deletion of their facts. We all might disagree sometimes, especialy since anything Non-Dom always seems to get deleted, but I hope you will understand. I'm going to re-insert the so called vandalism back in there tomorrow, and if you, or anyone else reverts it, I will call upon an admin. I like to think that you were just confused as to what was actualy going on, and happen to be on the wrong side of this insident. At any rate, sorry for the misspellings (native tongue is Hebrew).
| 0 |
Yes, the bot seems to have missed a few promoted around the same time, for some reason. Messages have been left with the bot maintainers; if they can't assist we may have to do things manually for those articles, we'll see. Cheers,
| 0 |
", 29 January 2009 (UTC)
No I shouldn't, and please remain WP:CIVIL. That was what the article was called in the first place; it was moved without discussion. I restored it to what the source calls it. It's plural; it was not called ""Tyneside Electric"" but ""the Tyneside Electrics"". (T) 21:57"
| 0 |
update on gredit report
| 0 |
Yes Ryan, I created that logo myself. I'm actually giving information for topics that no one is willing to expand on but I know from personal experience and research. Thanks for feedback!
| 0 |
Yes indeed, be among the first to join the bookburning censorship!
| 0 |
" August 2009 (UTC)
Article is called ""The one-handed economist"". I think that your version misses the focus of The Economist criticism. They are arguing that Krugman sometimes misleads his readers with his use of economics, not that he makes simple errors. Thing 19:38, 31"
| 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.