text
stringlengths 1
29.3k
⌀ | label
float64 0
1
|
|---|---|
We have a permission to upload files from that http://www.cngcoins.com - see Commons:Template:CNG -) See you later!
| 0 |
An example of fait accompli and WP:JDL. This definition is not used of biographies of Muslim people. Not any concrete exmp for müslim, christian or jews people..You should stop practicing the policy by oneself and commanding role. The existence of the source, this definition and funny redirect does not require.
| 0 |
"
Controversial Remarks Alleged Calling Facebook Users ""Dumb F**ks""
sources for the below mentioned contribution:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/02/01/is-zuckerbergs-the-hacker-way-letter-facebooks-dont-be-evil-and-will-it-live-up-to-it/
http://gawker.com/5636765/facebook-ceo-admits-to-calling-users-dumb-fucks
http://au.businessinsider.com/well-these-new-zuckerberg-ims-wont-help-facebooks-privacy-problems-2010-5
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/14/facebook_trust_dumb/
http://www.theweek.co.uk/technology/14625/are-users-%E2%80%98dumb-fucks%E2%80%99-trusting-data-facebook
http://tdh.me/zuckerberg-called-early-facebook-users-dumb-fucks-so-what/
http://anphicle.com/en/they-trust-me-dumb-fucks-facebook-ceo-mark-zuckerberg/
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Facebook-Mark-Zuckerberg-Social-Networking-privacy-security,news-6794.html
http://au.businessinsider.com/embarrassing-and-damaging-zuckerberg-ims-confirmed-by-zuckerberg-the-new-yorker-2010-9
Other sections on Wikipedia where Controversial Remarks is valid:
Bryant Gumbel (section Controversial remarks)
Mel Gibson (section Controversial remarks)
Sherrod Brown (section Controversial remarks)
Kent Hovind (section Controversial remarks)
Venkaiah Naidu (section Controversial Remarks)
Greg Gutfeld (section Controversial remarks)
Lawrence Cannon (section Controversial remarks)
Daniel Bernard (diplomat) (section Controversial remark)
James R. Flynn (section Controversial remarks)
and many many more
start.
While at Harvard College 19-year-old Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg allegedly used login data from his social network to hack into fellow students email accounts; that evidence also included instant message transcripts where he calls facebook users ""dumb fucks"". The alleged following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room:
Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard
Zuck: Just ask.
Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS
[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?
Zuck: People just submitted it.
Zuck: I don't know why.
Zuck: They ""trust me""
Zuck: Dumb fucks.
In another instant message (IM)
FRIEND: so have you decided what you are going to do about the websites?
ZUCK: yea i’m going to fuck them
ZUCK: probably in the year
ZUCK: *ear
end."
| 0 |
Exclusive - Scribbled note shows Nemtsov on trail of Russian deaths in Ukraine
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/03/05/uk-russia-nemtsov-ukraine-idUKKBN0M120620150305
| 0 |
I'll repeat to hypocritical debunker Petros471 what Lundse censored from his page:
Stop spamming on my talk page!!!! Why do you keep harrassing on the Astrology articles when you admit you have NOT studied Astrology. If you haven't studied brain surgery, do you believe your opinions are relevant on a brain surgery article???
| 0 |
"
January 2008
Please stop introducing jokes into articles. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Continuing to add jokes and other disruptive content into articles may lead to you being blocked from editing. Talk• Contributions
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices."
| 0 |
That sounds like an ex post facto rationalization. It's more likely that Appletrees learnt about how he was referred to in those peculiar Japanese expressions after he read those threads, not before. Coming up with such an insight from the beginning is unlikely even for a native speaker of Japanese, much less for someone reading Japanese with machine translation.
| 0 |
"
On ""If you had placed what others deemed controversial text, how would you like it to be dealt with?"":
Well, I try to avoid violating Wikipedia guidelines, not argue in articles, describe facts using neutral language and provide references/citations for basically everthing I write. "
| 0 |
"
The states did pass the laws, yes. Georgia passed a law against ""sodomy"". It's 16-6-2 in the GA code, you can go look it up. However it would be incorrect to say ""Georgia criminalizes sodomy"" because in Powell v. Georgia that law was ruled unconstitutional. State codes reflect the will of the state legislature at the time, and laws are not stricken from the books when ruled unconstitutional by courts. "
| 0 |
"
Dog does not eat dog
I provided a response on my discussion page. My complaint for abuse of power by the administrator Future Perfect at Sunrise concerns his first blocking for ""tendentious editing"". This act, which I dispute, becomes a reason for my post disadvantaged in the situation. "
| 0 |
"
The Halo's RfA
{|
|-
|
|valign=top|Mark Dingemanse...Thank you very much for the constructive criticism in your oppose comment in my request for adminship. Ultimately, no consensus was reached, and I failed to be promoted, but I am very grateful for your coments. I will strive to better myself in all areas, especially Mainspace. Θ |}"
| 0 |
Edits to Khamis al-Obeidi
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
| 0 |
Kwami, who lies and deletes. I'm sure you have heard this before but kwami, you haven't got a clue as to what civil means.
| 0 |
Hi Zad68, yeah that would be awesome if you got it passed as a FA! I'm currently working in Brazil at the moment and just logged in to update my userpage that I won't be active for about three months, so unfortunately I won't be able to help out. Hope it goes well! Cheers,
| 0 |
Welcome!
Hello, Amberlynnkinsey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
| 0 |
" 2015 (UTC)
First a suggestion for Sarah Welsh, if you are ""struggling"", and that too with the very first words of the article , just hold off rather than going ahead and still editing the article (and making it, as you did in this case, almost impossible for anyone to comprehend). This is not someone's personal blog, but a page with more than 2000 daily views. So please act with discretion.
Second, your allegation that my edits ""distorted and misrepresented the sources such as Nesbitt's OUP book"" is a complete LIE. I did not even bring in the Nesbitt book. So, again, as has been found out on many prior occasions, don't mislead people and please show some civility. Rather, it is you who removed reliably sourced content that did not comply with your own biased views, while you were on your massive blind spree to undo all my edits. For instance, I had quoted directly from Mansukhani, Introduction to Sikhism, that I had referenced when mentioning word of God ""The Granth presides over all congregations and represents the word of God in permanent form"", which you blindly removed.
Coming now to the sentence in the first paragraph on the key beliefs, I had made an edit a few days ago. You again made modifications to them. I suggest you actually go and read the sources well. In any case, I have added another source, and all the beliefs I have included are now present in the three cited sources. Now of course, to make complete sentences and for improved readability, I have to add some of my own words. (e.g., key beliefs are ""engaging in"" selfless service, ""striving for"" social justice; rather than selfless service, social justice.) I urge you to exercise extreme restraint and caution from here on, rather than engaging in uncivilized behavior and/or edit-warring. 07:22, 10 October"
| 0 |
"
While I agree that this article isn't FA material, I must suggest that your added criticism in the lead is also repetitive. The SPLC's opinion of the show is referenced throughout. At the very least, your edit should be amended to read that The Political Cesspool has hosted FORMER members of the Ku Klux Klan. In fact, the only one I can find for sure is David Duke, who has also been interviewed by every major talk radio and television program in the country. (Perhaps it should read, ""a former member of the Ku Klux Klan."") Furthermore, Duke was in the Klan in the 1970's, nearly three decades before The Political Cesspool first went on the air. Does Wolf Blitzer's Wiki entry read that he has hosted Klan members? Duke has appeared on Blitzer's show.
There are already many people who feel that this article is flagrantly biased. Right or wrong, to have it read as though this radio program frequently interviews current members of the ""Ku Klux Klan"" is misleading. Regardless of its ideology, this show has had many big names as guests, as Stonemason points out."
| 0 |
Please don't blank archived AFDs, or anything for that matter.
(T C)
| 0 |
(UTC)
Actually, most of the romance words in English come from Norman French, abit removed from French (especially modern French). Then there is another grouping of Latinate words which came in via the Grammar school boys (Grammar schools of the late medieval being schools which taught latin grammar, and which required students to speak grammar at all times), and the ecclesiastical coinages, from around the same period (late Tudor England onwards). The first lot, the Norman French, had a rather different historical journey from the second lot, the second lot being rather closer to Classical Latin (actually most are Church or Medieval latin, but the difference here is not so great). The Norman French borrowings have a little more fanciness than regular Germanic English because Norman French was the language of the English ruling class (and law etc) for about 300 years. Most the food words come through this path. The second group (borrowed in from about 1400 to 1700) are fancy not so much because they represent the ruling classes, but because they represent learning. Then there's a few other words which come in from other places, like Piano (from Italtian), and others which are similar because they actually come from a common germanic/italic root even a proto-Indo-European root.
I think that it would be worth noting the path of derivation (NF vs Lating vs other).
On a second related point, the Germanic in English comes from several dialects, from both the North Germanic group (Norse) and the West Germanic. Old English had a few differing dialects. Northern English dialects tend to have a little more Norse and a little less Anglo-saxon, than the south-east. There are Norse and Saxon cognates which both made it into English, skirt and shirt being the famous examples. So, again some more information regarding the exact derivation of the Germanic, unless someone wants to go the whole hog and put in the proto-Germanic reconstructions. But that probably cannot be done. 14:17, 15 July 2007
| 0 |
"
Requested move
In English wikipedia, ""FLOW (band)"" should be moved to ""Flow (band)"" because of naming convention. —
Survey
Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
Survey - in support of the move
Survey - in opposition to the move
Discussion
Add any additional comments:"
| 0 |
"
The user hasn't made any edits in five days. don't talk email me "
| 0 |
yet more arrogance from another jumped up editor who thinks he 'owns'' Wikipedia. How sad your life must be to have nothing but Wiki editing.
| 0 |
Except that it doesn't actually exclude it. In the absence of proof, what they said they thought very unlikely might actually be so.
| 0 |
"
No, I reverted it all (with no prodding from anyone else) because it has no bearing on whether or not you'll be unblocked and because it can, by and large, be discussed when your block has expired. The edits remain in the page history. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S "
| 0 |
"
Yes, that's probably the best way to view the development of that article. However, I can't go into that much detail myself because I certainly don't have the time to do that much research. That quote from Iliad is rather odd. Homer seems to be refering to Hesiod's earlier Theogony; but the details are different. The Perseus Digital Library (whose pages take some time to load; so for anybody reading this, be patient) translates Homer's quote just as you say (line 14 onwards), and has this to say for Theogony (line 720 onwards). I'm no classicist, but I'd be weary of that bit of text - it is certinly odd and probably should not be taken at face value so naïvely. As you say, everywhere else (as far as I know) he refers to the underworld as the ""domain of hades"". As for Erebus, the quotes from Iliad (under the heading: 3 from Homer, Iliad), at face value, seem to indicate that it is a place. But this is merely a misunderstanding of what Erebus is. Erebus is the gloom, the darkness of the underworld, the ""place of dark mists"" as you put it. Replace ""Erebus"" with ""darkness of the underworld"" or the like and the quotes make just as much sense as the assumption that Erebus is a physical location. However, I don't know of any source that explicitly states that it is a location in the underworld; so, again, where does that quote come from? "
| 0 |
Personal attacks
Do not accuse me of making personal attacks.
| 0 |
"
You're claiming there isn't any reliable sources because you've done no research. A simple check of the GameFAQs website (which lists pretty much every single commercial videogame) shows the majority of console RPGs are in fact of Japanese origin. In fact, GameFAQs has a specific subgenre of game called ""Console-style RPG""; Every system has a ""Games by Category: Role-Playing > Console-style RPG"" subsection. Give it a rest guys; you're mistaken. "
| 0 |
"Indeed. We all know that, until the 'renovation' in the late 80s, the Statue of Liberty was in New Jersey. Phones on the island had (201) area codes, and power came from the NJ side.
Another interesting ""New Jersey border"" fact is that, for all intents and purposes, geographically, New Jersey is a peninsula ... but not all of the 'New Jersey peninsula' is New Jersey! Look carefully at the Delaware - NJ state border south of Pennsville. Part of Dealware is ... in New Jersey!
"
| 0 |
Niu Fu was killed by Huchier circa May 192, and Dong Cheng helped and escorted Emperor circa July, 195. There exists three year gaps between two events. There is no single historical account on what Dong Cheng did during these three years in history books. Therefore you should not assume that Dong Cheng served Emperor after the death of Niu Fu. ( )
| 0 |
You just exposured your bias and hecne your epic fail. Listen- this is an article about what TZM is. If you dont want them on Wikipedia, then ask for the articles to be removed. Otherwise, you are just trolling
| 0 |
Should we include Steve Holtz now that we know that he's GOB's son?
| 0 |
Mock me if you like, but I am deadly serious.
| 0 |
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -
| 0 |
"==Merger==
As of today, Google says ""Recursive Bayesian estimation"" is the more common term, so I suggest we move this there. Indeed, this is the shorter of the two articles. There is little in this article that is not mentioned in that one anyway, so I vote Merge. "
| 0 |
haha same old execuse from Pro-Imperialists...I'm under no illusion of trying to make Jews, Chinese and Koreans look good, those are the facts, they suffered under their oppressors, however Ijime topic has got nothing to do with other articles.
Its an independent matter. Here in NZ, we only focus on facts, such as Ijime which does exist in Japan and it poses major threat to its People and society
| 0 |
The security of this site is very bad
Hello Edgar,
I hold to announce you that your site can be modified by no
matter whom. The security of your site seems to me compromised. They
is dangerous. An encyclopaedia written by no matter whom is not an
encyclopaedia.
I in the future ask you to better make safe your site.
Thank you.
| 0 |
Okay, but the plot is only 819 words long, and both the themes and production sections are over a 1000 words now. There should be a way to condense that. Since that seems to be your pet, why not work with that?
| 0 |
"
Problems with the article
Apparently this is a very loose term used to distinguish people who have acquired some kind of long term fame or notoriety associated with popular culture. Hendrix, The Beatles, Elvis, Sinatra, Crosby, Jolson, and so on might be described as ""pop icons"" because they are strongly associated with, and in some ways personify, the zeitgeist or an era in popular culture. This includes film and other popular art forms, and sport (De Niro, Monroe, Bogart, Muhammad Ali, Pelé). It often includes people who died relatively young (Morrison, Hendrix, James Dean). So far so good.
Then there are people whose work wasn't primarily in or related to popular culture, but whose image has been co-opted as a pop icon (Einstein). Well, okay.
Now looking at the article, we see a section called ""Notable pop icons"" comprising, presently, some forty names. More than half of those names are sourced from a single news story based on a press release produced by a single media organisation in November, 2003. A further seven of them are base on a similar news story from a different media organisation in 2005 The criterion for the list of 100 members given in the first news story, it turns out, is a viewer's poll by a single cable television channel, VH1, from a shortlist drawn up by ""A panel of celebrities and experts – including presenter June Sarpong, newsreader Krishnan Guru-Murthy and GQ editor Dylan Jones."" Presumably the experts on the panel asked to remain anonymous.
Further examination of that single source also demonstrates that there are unexplained omissions from our list. If we assume for the moment that membership of the VH1 list (which is biased towards the tastes and cultural memory of the British viewership of that channel) is a sign of ""pop icon"" status, where is Princess Diana on our list? She's number 5 on the VH1 list but completely absent from ours. Similarly, The Simpsons (VH1: number 6) and Robbie Williams (VH1: number 9) are omitted from our list.
Looking in the opposite direction, Aerosmith is included in our list because MTV featured the band in a program called ""MTV icons"", but is nowhere to be seen in the VH1 100 (not surprising as the band, while not unknown in VH1's target market, isn't exactly a household name). And while VH1 lists first man on the moon Neil Armstrong at 76, his trumpet-playing namesake Louis Armstrong (selected as one of 100 ""Icons of the Century"" by Variety) is nowhere to be seen on VH1's chart.
There are also problems with the membership criteria of the sources. I've already mentioned the UK bias of the VH1 list (which goes some way to explain the presence of Beckham and Robbie Williams, both household names in the UK but not so well known elsewhere). The Variety list, for instance, sought to represent ""every side of show business"", so relatively obscure figures such as Arthur Freed (who wrote the lyrics for Singin' in the Rain and produced many hit films) are listed as ""Icons of the Century"". Clearly the people on the list are there because they're ""iconic"" in some sense, but not in the sense implied by this article.
Another thing that isn't addressed is the requirement of longevity. Can we include Britney Spears, who a mere decade ago was an unknown with a recording contract and an audacious concept for a pop video for her debut single? Britney Spears' career has hit an air pocket, and there's no way of knowing whether her image will recover in the public mind. Perhaps it's premature to describe this relative newcomer as a ""pop icon""."
| 0 |
other editors who waste their time.
| 0 |
"if you do not consider the invasion of iraq terrorism then you must reject the definition, ""the systematic use of terror..."" - the first phase of the american invasion was self-titled the ""shock and awe"" campaign.
"
| 0 |
"==List of online booksellers==
Hell there, just a quick note to say that if you think there are issues with the content of the article (List of online booksellers) it would be best to clarify this in the talkpage, rather than the article itself. Best wishes, "
| 0 |
Semi-protected edit request on 20 February 2014
Communism isn't moneyless.
| 0 |
Article Evaluation
Fist article, nothing to evaluate.
Second article:
Availability Heuristic Evaluation
Good Article:
– Lead section is understandable
oTABI understand what theory is being presented
oTABExample helped make things more clear
– There are numerous headings/subheadings
oTABThis helps people jump directly to where they want to go
oTABYou can run through this article to see if what information you need is actually presented
– This article is very balanced
oTABThere is a lot of information presented, but each aspect of the article is presented equally
oTABThere doesn’t seem to be one section of this article that receives more attention than another
– This article is neutral
oTABWhile this article presents the readers with examples and applications, it also explains the theory’s critiques
– This article is reliable
oTABThere are 27 strong sources referenced in this article
oTABAnyone is able to go directly to where the author of this article found the information presented
Poor Article:
– No warning banner is presented
– The lead is good, but a little redundant, but still understandable
– After each paragraph, a source is listed
– All groups are named
– All topics are covered
– Each section is given the same amount of attention
– There is a good amount of sources listed
| 0 |
"
Mark Foley?
I highly doubt there's any joke about Mark Foley, it's just a generic SP cop joke: ""lololol you shot a guy for no reason?"""
| 0 |
http://scientology-buffalo.org/en_US/community/opening/page05.html Do you really think they fabricated this?
| 0 |
please have a look at the lphant article
Please have a look at the new lphant article. I have made several changes and I hope the article is more neutral and more informative now. Thanks.
| 0 |
":::: You could note that I suggested a mention in a sentence in the article, not as a bullet in the see also. More importantly, however, you are incorrect in asserting that it puts our editorial rubber stamp on the connection; the only thing receiving the editorial ""rubber stamp"" is the fact that it has been suggested by notable commentators. This latter happens to be true, so it should be uncontroversial to include it.
"
| 0 |
???
Hi
You left a message on my accoutn and I don't understand why. I have not even been at my PC over the last hour or so, and to log back into Wikipedia to find your comment I find offensive and a slur on my character. Personally, I feel busy-bodies like yourself who 'police' Wikipedia unnessicarily are spoiling it for everyone. To be called a vandal is tantamount to slander, and I have already contacted my lawyers.
RM
| 0 |
"As for the notability of Yamal, Phil Jones (among others) thinks it is important and it does supply a ""hockey stick"" recon, eh? Albeit a heavily-criticized one. One has to wonder why there is no mention at all here - or at Climategate, last I looked "
| 0 |
and the best way of elucidating centrifugal force as an outward radial effect
| 0 |
"You wrote at talk:law of total probability:
I agree the definition is inconsistent —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.47.185.2
Can you explain what you mean by ""the definition""? I can't tell which side, if either, your'e agreeing with. (If you're agreeing with the anonymous person whose edits I reverted, then you're wrong and you're not very good at math.) As far as I can tell, no one in this discussion ever said that any definition is inconsistent, so there's no one for you to agree with about that. "
| 0 |
I didn't even say or imply that I have a problem with you improving articles, if the tone of the comment suggested that I did then I apologize. I was just curious to know how you can declare an article 'yours'. Thanks for replying to my question.
| 0 |
"
Daniel 9:24-27 Daniel tells of the comming of the messiah Jesus. This was a prophecy and the Magi or wise men read the prophecy and identified the Mesiah well in advance. This proves that for men of faith prophecy is fact not mere speculation. Jesus told Thomas, ""more blessed is he that belives without first seeing"". I have posted an article by Pastor David Bay for you to read which explains in detail the prophecy of Jesus's comming.
THE UNPARALLELED PRECISE PROPHECY
Daniel 9:24-26, ""Seventy weeks of years, or 490 years are decreed upon your people and upon your holy city Jerusalem, to finish and put an end to transgression, to seal up and make full the measure of sin, to purge away and make expiation and reconciliation for sin, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint a holy of holies. Know, therefore, and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem until the coming of the anointed one, a prince, shall be seven weeks of years, and sixty-two weeks of years; it shall be built again with city square and moat, but in troublous times. And after the 62 weeks of years, shall the anointed one be cut off (killed) and shall have nothing and no one belonging to and defending Him...""
The remaining one week is found in verse 27, and refers to the last seven years of earth's history, the period which we know as the ""Great Tribulation"".
The term ""Weeks of Years"" was a common Jewish term. It meant literally seven (7) years. The term comes from God's commandment in Leviticus 25:3-4 to farm a piece of land for only six years, allowing it to lie fallow for the seventh. This seven-year period came to be known as a ""week of years"". Therefore, Seventy Weeks of Years was 490 Hebrew years.
Note this prophecy contains three parts:
1. 7 Weeks of Years (49 Hebrew Years)
2. 62 Weeks of Years (434 Hebrew Years)
3. 1 Week of Years (7 Hebrew Years)
At the precise point in history when the 7 + 62 Weeks of Years occurred, Israel could expect Messiah to announce Himself as Messiah. What great news! This means that Israel could not miss Messiah. All they had to do was to count, be cognizant of current events in Israel as they unfolded, and be aware of this prophecy.
This study will show us several things:
1. Why the Wise Men knew the time for Messiah was close.
2. Why Israel missed Messiah.
3. How this applies to us today.
Let us now consider the meaning of the prophecy.
I. The Duration of the Prophecy
This prophecy stipulated that Messiah would be presented to Israel and would be killed after 69 weeks of years had elapsed from the specified starting point. When we multiply 69 times 7, we understand that the time involved here equals 483 Jewish years. Since the Jewish calendar contains 360 days, we can easily see that God is talking about 173,880 days. Therefore, we can expect that 173,880 days after the prophecy started, the Messiah would present Himself to Israel as Messiah-King.
II. The Starting Point of the Prophecy (Daniel 9:25a)
In this verse , God said the prophecy would begin ""from the going forth (the issuing) of the commandment to restore and rebuild Jerusalem..."" At the time God gave Daniel this prophecy, Israel was a slave nation under Babylon; however, God had foretold that this slavery would last only 70 years. This 70-year period was rapidly coming to a close; indeed, non-Jewish history records that the Medo-Persian emperor Artaxerxes issued such a decree on March 14, 445 B.C. Therefore, precisely 173,880 days from this day should bring us to some significant event in Jesus' life which presented Him to the nation Israel as Messiah.
III. The Mathematics Of The Prophecy
A. The First Seven Weeks (49 Jewish Years)
If you study the book of Nehemiah, you will find the account of the Jewish pilgrimage to rebuild Jerusalem following King Artaxerxes' decree. The prophet Nehemiah assumed charge of this rebuilding effort, which was carried out in such extreme hardship and danger that the builders carried swords with them as they were building the walls. Thus was fulfilled precisely the prophecy in verse 25b,""...it shall be built again with city square and moat, but in troublous times.""
This effort began in 445 B.C. and culminated in 396 B.C., exactly 49 years, just as foretold.
B. The Second Period (62 Weeks of Years, 434 years)
Daniel 9:26 foretells that the ""anointed One"" would come after this period and would then be killed. This wording is understood by most conservative scholars to refer to Jesus Christ, not at His birth, but at His presentation as the Messiah-Prince. (2) ""
| 0 |
"I agree that different types of irrigation are best practiced for different applications. For example, sub surface drip for row crops and center pivot for field crop. However, there is so much ""crossover"" that it would be tough to fully delineate which specific type of irrigation is most often used for which type of crop. Furthermore, to suggest one type of irrigation modality for an application will undoubtedly lead to argument from the manufacturers watching this entry.
Tom Kruer
"
| 0 |
File:Southern Rhodesia scout badge.png: newer version that just says Rhodesia, but with the fleur-de-lis like File:Swaziland SSA.svg, please do not overwrite the original on this one
is like this one ok? File:The Boy Scouts Association of Rhodesia.png
Perfect, beautiful, thank you so much!
| 0 |
The main pic was the cover of an upcoming comic. It is public knowledge, as it appears in previews as well as the DC Comics website. I don't see how a comic book cover is a spoiler.
| 0 |
I just made Wikipedia a little better. I just made Wikipedia slightly less torturous for those of us who are geniuses to read. 76.178.252.151
| 0 |
"
the ""ultra-nationalist"" political party in France during the Revolution
what was it's name? -D"
| 0 |
webhamster
The interests and welfare of children are of paramount importance. Wikipedia is closed to 95% of the UK amd if you wish to extend this censorship to a global level then please carry on removing the anti-pedophile warnings.
| 0 |
I'm really confused, I've never been to any of these pages. Why do I have so many warnings?
| 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:The Rolling Stones/Archive index template
| 0 |
The Gathering)]]''' | page = From the Vault: Dragons }}
| 0 |
"
As per my message time-stamped 01:36 (above), ""as per your request, I will happily email ArbCom (I will be able to do this before 2300 GMT on 22AUG2014) and tell them I will start looking for this email."" I regret if this is too vague, I am at a loss as to what I can do to make it clearer for you. "
| 0 |
The problem is not in the heading but in the heads of certain editors, who make comments and then delete them to hide traces of their POV.
| 0 |
You have been blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. The block is for a period of 48 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.
| 0 |
legal matters are subject of the various countries, and should not be included in this article.
| 0 |
"
Image copyright problem with Image:1321 jezelarge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1321 jezelarge.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Think out loud "
| 0 |
I always appreciate a note before a speedy template is left, especially if a page has been around a long time. It's much easier to see what's going on before the page is speedied. All the best: Farmbrough, .
| 0 |
"
This poorly written Wiki article attempts to make it appear that ancient Macedonians were distinct from ancient Greeks. I would gambit the article is largely edited by people from Fyrom/Republic of Macedonia with irredentist aims towards Greece (contrary to both US and UN resolutions to refrain from propaganda against Greek Macedonians). Despite the occasional voice of objections there is no major dispute among most scholars that ancient Macedon was inherently Greek in nature. (at least more than anything else) The Hellenic age (the greek word for what we in english call ""greek"") is evidence beyond dispute of this.
To give an example of historical distortions found in this article...
""Macedon or Macedonia (Greek Μακεδονία Makedonía) was the name of a kingdom centered in the northern-most part of ancient Greece, bordered by the kingdom of Epirus to the west and the region of Thrace to the east.""
By saying the ""northern-most part of Greece"" it makes it seem like it bordered Greece. There was no ""Greece"" state in ancient times... there was only a collection of autonomous city states and Kingdoms that self-identified as Greeks. (Mycenae, Athens, Argos, Ithica, Sparta, Macedon Corinth, etc...)
Another example of irredentism.... the wiki article states....
""It became increasingly Atticised during this period, though prominent Athenians appear to have regarded the Macedonians as uncouth[3].
This statement is very deceptive. It was common during times of conflict for Greeks to label each other ""barbarians"" (non-greeks) as an insult. (similar to saying ""unAmerican"" today)
While Demosthenes used ""barbarians"" to describe Macedonians... he also used it describe the Athenean orator Aristogeiton [Aristophanes, ‘Nephelae’ (line 491). And even Demosthenes himself as described by as a ""barbarian"" by Aeschine. Plato characterized the Lesbian Aeolic Greek dialect as ‘a barbarian register’ while addressing Pittakos of Mytilene. Athenaios VIII 350a Socrates calls Strepsiadis “ανθρωπός αμαθές ουτώσι και βάρβαρος“. (Strepsiadis…was a well-known Athenian) - Protagoras 3410 etc... etc... There are countless instances of Greeks describing each other as barbarians.
There are other examples of bias in the article but the most telling is how it lightly brushs over the Hellenic period of Macedon (similiar to the golden age of Athens).... in which Macedonia spread the Greek Language, Greek culture, and Greek ideas to the region. They unique flavour of macedon among Greeks... was very similar to how Athens also had unique aspects to it... as did Sparta... as did most of the Greek mini-states.
If Macedon wasn't Greek.... then Greek philosopher Aristotle wasn't Greek either (since he came from Chalcidice in Macedon). To go down this road we would also need to rewrite a fair portion of Wiki articles related to antiquity and the Hellenistic period. To do this to suit the political needs of a country whose population is roughly a quarter Muslim and most of the rest are ethnically slavic (who have called themselves Yugoslavians, Serbians, and Bulgarians in the last hundred years) amounts to roughly helping the Taliban blow up Buddhist statues for political ends.
Because of political nature of the article I would advise a complete rewrite by people will credentials in ancient studies. History is not a popularity contest. Just stick to the facts as we know them. What's ironic is that virtually every last piece of ""evidence"" that Macedon wasn't Greek... is either translated from Greek or comes from Greek artifacts. The citizens of Fyrom can't even read inscriptions from Macedon... as they are almost all writen in Greek. (Their own ""Macedonian"" language was called Bulgarian less than a hundred years ago)"
| 0 |
"
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 0 "
| 0 |
"
The publication ""The Chamcha Age"" - An Era of Stooges, written by Kanshi Ram is not copyrighted unless someone seems to have copyrighted it after his death. Kanshi Ram was editor of a publication ""The Oppressed Indian"", issues of which of the late 70s and early 80s, I have read. I have also had the opportunity to witness him addressing gatherings on quite a few occasions. I felt that the content at the moment is drawn mostly from media reports that don't objectively represent this individual and his struggle for the emancipation of the downtrodden masses in India. Therefore, it should be okay to retain the first paragraph that is compiled from text on ""About the Author"" from ""The Chamcha Age"". At present, in web space, bspindia.org appears to be close in terms of being authentic in representing the views of the Bahujan Samaj Party, a political party founded by Kanshi Ram. Although this site claims copyright over the contents, it doesn't formally acknowledge the source from which it has drawn content that is available without copyright. I wouldn't mind writing to the [email protected] to get permission for use of content on their site for reproduction on wikipedia.
Secondly, I can modify the article appropriately so that content from bspindia.org and other sources is only used as a source of 'information' instead of 'article content'.
I feel strongly that the page on Kanshi Ram needs to be changed appropriately so that the reader will get a proper perspective on his life and mission in ushering political change in modern India."
| 0 |
Read on talk page I have given detail explanation that Indian Buddhist Movement is a non secterian movement. Goenka, Ambedkar, Iyothi Das everybody has given hid contribution. Now British Buddhist, Japanese Buddhist are also helping the Buddhist Movement and it is growing. If you need any proofs I am ready to give. If you want to come India I'll arrange visits to different place to see how many people are converting to Buddhism from various Hindu castes.
| 0 |
"
I agree with your statements and the reverts. I would like to add some different thoughts.
I prefer incremental addition of material, because it ensures a proper peer-review process. Adding 60kb on a single day is just too much to control.
The sudden addition of long paragraphs also raises the question where this material comes from. Of course, the editor might be extremely gifted and produce an unbelievable amount of information in almost no time. But suspicions that the material is copy-pasted are not too far fetched, I think. Especially, when seeing that the style differs drastically between different section (e.g., the way references are coded). I would appreciate, if you (User:Historian19) could enlighten us about this question.
Another thing I would appreciate are WP:edit summaries. Thanks. T C "
| 0 |
"
Depopulation
Morris, in The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited lists the causes for the depopulation of Isdud as Military assault on settlement and Expulsion by Jewish forces. Could the editor who believes that it is ""POV"" to include this please explain why and provide sources disputing it? nableezy - "
| 0 |
Just as a point of fact and in support of Myopia123's comment above. In the U.S. Legal system, Trial Juries are Triers of fact. The trial jury found that Kyle had defamed Ventura and Kyle was unjustly enriched by that defamation. The case is under appeal, there are those who hold that the trial was faulty and that the verdict should be overturned or a new trial given. We are all entitled to our opinions of the trial verdict, but for now the facts of the case are as the trial jury determined them to be based upon the evidence given in court under the rules of the U.S. Federal Court system. I'm not sure how one can get a fairer determination of facts than one that's been litigated for about three years.
| 0 |
okay
I'll quit vandalizing while I'm ahead.
| 0 |
Alternately, it's possible that I don't know where I'm posting things
| 0 |
"
{| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent""
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#""
|style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
Hello 71.188.226.218! You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to [ create an account]. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address () is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
Happy editing! User:HopsonRoad
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#""
|style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
Getting started Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents
Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article
Simplified Manual of Style
|style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#""
! Getting help
|-
|style=""color:#000""|
[[Wikipedia:Overview FAQ|Frequently
| 0 |
I doubt responses to a proposed bill that was changed a week later have enduring notability.
| 0 |
Hi, I dont really care much for the Serb/Albanian disputes but I thought it was common knowledge that Kosovo is an autonomous province of Serbia (at least theoretically). The way it is written it makes it sound that Kosovo is a province of Yugoslavia. I am pretty sure this is not the case otherwise its position under international law would be similar to that of Montenegro and independence would be much less of a problem than it is at this point. The article should be unprotected and reference to Serbia should be included. I dont think Albanian wikipedians should try to stop this from happening. The problem (and paradox) of Kosovo still being part of Serbia is not going to go away by negating it on wikipedia. If I were Kosovar Albanian i would be trying to make this be known so as to find a solution for the future of my territory.
Asterion, q pasaa quishooo! ya me he metío en l embolao este... q vicio! jeje.
| 0 |
This should NOT be titled a Aguilera song! It should just be titled Beautiful_song or Beautiful_Perry_song.
Linda Perry wrote the damn thing, no matter how many pop singers cover it.
| 0 |
A message from Crum375
| 0 |
"
Sure you are ""retired""
If you really are retired, why do you keep editing wikipedia? Is this a joke? An attempt to make yourself look sad? Or are you simply trying to avoid getting punished for your sins (like, the 3 other times you have ""retired"", but then returned to spew your half truths, and (which was always sourced/sourced by N:POV) propaganda about Soviet Union, Russia, and everything Russian)?
Please stop kidding us all, OK? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.91.24.163 "
| 0 |
Ten things you didn't know about Wikipedia •
Editing Talk:Community organizing
| 0 |
Banned
Due to your recent activity of banning other users; you too have now been banned for 14 days without the possibililty of parole.
| 0 |
Please read WP:RS as to why you aren't a reliable source.
| 0 |
"
Kosoo, Yugoslavia,Serbia
Can you find here in rez 1244 and last statment of CG the combination of strings ""Serbia"" Just find this combination and I will accept your faculty or what ever you have wrotit here. I know thate you are dreaming about Rusia als superpower evean if you eat USB Brot. Neverminde just find this combination ""Kosovo"" als part ""Serbia"" in the paper witch was acceptyt from USA and Rusia and UN since 1999. - Hipi"
| 0 |
MfD nomination of User:Slipknotanarchy
. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Slipknotanarchy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
| 0 |
"
Pretty badly written introduction.
Namely that the writer seems more interested in writing about common law than civil law. While I am sure some degree of comparison is very useful, if not necessary, I don't think that going to great lengts to explain what common law is and then just say ""and civil law is not like this"" is a very good way of defining civil law.
The 4th paragraph in the intro (the largest one) is the main culprit here. In fact the third sentence in it doesn't even follow on properly from the first two and should logically read pretty much the opposite of what it does. In addition it seems to be be very US-centric: while it mentions English Common Law, it then goes on to list examples of basic tenets of this which seem to be drawn directly from the US Constitution.
So I think it's pretty badly written as an introduction, but as I don't know too much about the subject I don't really want to go about editing it myself."
| 0 |
"
""Dominion"" was not used to to indicate ""semi-independent self-governing territory under the British Crown"". In 1867, it was used to refer to any colony subservient to the British Crown and Parliament. The word Dominon was used to uphold that Monarchical principle. "
| 0 |
|living = yes
|listas = Haskins, Christopher
| 0 |
"
To all users who participated in my RFA: thank you. The kind words are appreciated. The constructive criticism I will use to become better. I hope I live up to the expectations. ≈talk "
| 0 |
Partenie Zografski
There is a vandal taking actions in this newly created article. Would you please take a look? Regards.
| 0 |
To get to the bottom of what you meant by and why you made the 'redneck' comment, what you thought it would achieve, and whether you appreciated how it could be taken by others (not just MONGO, who has made his feelings pretty clear). As a fellow editor interested in the health and well-being of the site. Nothing more suspicious than that, I promise.
| 0 |
create violence between nations
he likes conflicts and making desorder and trouble in arab world, his english is so bad his prononciation
is worse than hindi people !! he doesn't speak any word of French language and Arabic which is his mother
tongue he always reads on papers or he learns by heart what he says, so as a result of his inferiority complex,
he laughs at some people the fact they speak French as well as Arabic.
f
| 0 |
I read all the discussion above , from what i see Unomi argues that atheism is a belief system ,based on sources ofc, however ,categorizing for example chemistry as a belief system implies that whatever results we obtain from experiments are biased , since the basis of chemistry would be belief not reason.
Thus it should be discussed is atheism a belief system ? ,
are atheists a class of dogmatic people that regardless of experiments and proof to contrary , or lack of proof , still believe that deities do not exist?
or is atheism a philosophical theory that states that deities do not exist for following Reasons (insert reasons here)86.123.168.47
| 0 |
2009 (UTC)
BTW, you're not supposed to enjoy the Wikipedia. You're supposed gain valuable knowledge from it. 68.149.121.27 22:27, 1 April
| 0 |
"— Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) "
| 0 |
"
It is complete and utter nonsense to claim that ""anyone who understands science knows there are no facts."" Science is loaded with facts. Facts are usually represented by the data with which we deal when engaged in experimentation and observation. Yes, rules and ideas are tested. Theories are tested. They are all tested against the data - the facts as we have gathered them. It's a fact that people don't rocket off into space when they jump up from a trampoline. Theories about gravity serve to explain that fact. It's a fact that organic life on this planet is interrelated and evolved over billions of years. The various theories of evolution explains that fact. -
"
| 0 |
HoshiNoKaabii2000 and TreCoolGuy
TCG claims that DrummerSP is not him and HNK claims that Unorginal is not him. I have been watching out on Hoshi for a while, but I only discovered Tre just now, they were also both blocked on 31 August 2013, this makes me wonder...
| 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.