Databoost/MCRS_by_Databoost · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 7 5k	degree_of_toxicity float64 0 1	contains_offensive_word int64 0 1	label int64 0 1
RT @ohhdatsbrucie: I can't be worried bout no bitch cause that bitch could be somewhere sucking dick	0.998264	1	1
Template Why not include the Bio link in the template? - it seems to me that it aids navigation...	0.000655	0	0
Curb your enthusiasm? Anjelah appeared in Season 8 episode 4 of Curb your enthusiasm, 'The Smiley Face as Mimi, the niece of a restaurant hostess Larry was dating.	0.000657	0	0
" Hmmm... I would like to respond to this, but I've just been blocked indefinitely! Seems someone objected to a posting I made about inappropriate sourcing on 'totalitarianism' by neocons... viz: ""Sockpuppetry Docmartincohen, Wikigiraffes, Dremeraldgibb, NoPointofView, Wikisquirrels all confirmed as the same already-blocked account and blocked accordingly. Wikipedia is not a platform for professional disputes or attacks on living persons. IP edits are also easily spotted and will be reverted and blocked as necessary - David Gerard (talk ) 03:41, 27 July 2008 (UTC ' In fact, several people use this computer... Even if it were true, this seems a long delayed adminstrative sanction against historical activities...? Scarcely serving any legitimate 'prevention of abuse' purpose. I've checked up: ther first 3 were blocked several months ago, Wikisquirrels who has made no controversial edits at all is being blocked today but has not made any edits for several months. My own account, - of course- is beyond reproach! I was just getting into the careful copy checking of the philosphy pages, when I came across a fake quotation about Hitler's views of Marxism, which I found sourced to an American neo-conservative, whose views were quite obviously part of a politically directed campaign. I raised the matter on WIkiedia review and lo! If anyone can help to get the block lifted, I'll be pleased to get back to this interesting issue and provide some references. 90.62.158.145 (as docmartincohen)"	0.001748	0	0
grow up.''' Kind regards	0.444924	1	1
@Cuner Makes you a pussy. Making stupid internet threats. You're a child and if it is about you which idk if it is, it's probably deserved.	0.995914	1	1
As far as I'm aware there's no precedent to suggest that an arbitrator who holds a strong view in a case is unable to enforce the actual literal decision of the arbitration committee. In fact, it's a rather odd suggestion - if arbcom members with strong feelings were unable to enforce the literal rulings of arbcom, it'd be a bit loony. Eric was very very clearly attempting to poke the bear. He knew he was under a sanction, and even if he thought it was a stupid sanction, he clearly and intentionally violated it to see if ArbCom was able or willing to enforce its rulings against him. I imagine if he agreed to abide by the sanction and apologized, it wouldn't be long before he was unblocked.	0.000944	0	0
" I don't want it anymore either. Sorry. BAM "	0.000876	0	0
Hi. I was talking about the article about J Junyadi in Hungarian language, http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunyadi_J%C3%A1nos, where his Cuman origin is considered aa being proved, even if there are many neutral sources which claim his Romanian (Vlach) descent; i was asking you, as Hungarian language speaker to try to improve that article ( )	0.00056	0	0
yo hoe will get slayed . 🔪🔪	0.81418	1	1
Yeah hoe	0.06743	0	1
RT @rebellious_midy: Ugly bitches definitely disguste me 😖 ewww yuck!	0.991455	1	1
Tyranny of averages I've created an article that is the converse of this/the law of averages, and welcome any comments/contributions. I've not yet x-ref'd it, in case people feel it ought to simply be merged and a redirect placed in its stead.	0.000641	0	0
John F. Kennedy Assassination	0.002309	0	0
" Unfortunately I dont think you did it right. You can't blank an entire article because three passages out of the whole thing, which is about 25% of the total, MIGHT be a copyright violation. I fixed your error and rewrote every passage sourced to the ourcampaigns website. • Lawrence Cohen "	0.00078	0	0
Well, since you're bending over backwards I guess I could grudgingly live with that wording. - MrX	0.0013	0	0
< who the heck wrote that crap _ explain why a forum devoted to Schapelle Corby should not be on her Wiki. What sets the other sites apart from mine ? My forum was the first and only Schapelle support site for months. Who the heck are you to say it should got here. You can remove it everyday and I will be back the next day to add it again. FFS get a life.	0.839437	1	1
This is just one of my fun socks. My real sock is real close to becoming an admin, will get someone to nominate him in the next few weeks.	0.003614	0	0
I realize that PageantUpdater has let her frustration get the better of her, but I think she is an important contributor and I think she deserves another chance.	0.00079	0	0
" Bossburg Tracks I see that the Bossburg tracksfamous because one of the track-maker's feet seems to have suffered from some sort of clubbing deformityare mentioned, but the discussion of the subject is limited to the usual ""where and when the trail was found"" info and then the well-known (at least in bf circles) quote about nobody being ""sick"" enough to have hoaxed it, etc. I have an article from Skeptic magazine, though, about how there were some suspicious aspects to its origin, the seemingly non-sensical path the tracks took, as well as the fact that someone had hoaxed a film of an injured, limping bigfoot either before or after the discovery (a significant distinction I need to recheck); in any case, the Bossburg incident is more complicated than presented in the Evidence article. For the longest time, I thought the whole thing represented very compelling evidenceif not the most compelling evidencesupporting Bigfoot's existence, but there actually is a cogent ""hoax"" counter-argument. Should this be summarized and included? "	0.000667	0	0
Nah, thats okay, I'll just change IPs, just keep being a dick. I hope you like sucking on your own, thats if you got one.	0.987106	1	1
You are a fool if you think Wikipedia is a respected entitity in this world. So, shut	0.957026	1	1
Fuck you Greenman Fucking piece of shit. You don't have the dignity of having your name on wikipedia. You deserve no respect what so ever. Fucking moron. Giving Jose Eduardo dos Santos false information on Wikipedia like saying that he is born in Luanda and as a PHD LPD YXZ degree in Timbacktu. FUCK YOU COMMUNIST LOVER By the way I am shitting in my pans for not being allowed to post on wikipedia. You can suck my cock, or probably not as I don't trust your mouth dick head.	0.998713	1	1
You don't know me, but I'm your bra. RT @HuffingtonPost: Doobie Brothers member Michael McDonald says he'll "come out as a tranny"	0.364155	1	1
Na its not goona go to FA, just leave it. Thriller 25 cant have its own page, then we leave it.	0.002644	0	0
Why isn't the article called SLOVENIAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE or SLOVENIAN WAR OF LIBERATION?	0.000737	0	0
That is all very nice and good cyclic logic, but I would like a second opinion. Otherwise, as I have said, without acutally putting the offence in front of me it can be interpreted as weasel words and intimidation tactics. Also if I have bothered you so much, then for the reason of conflict of interest as well, I deserve a second opinion, and not from one of your admin clique buddies either. Also you seem to know what violation I have commited with Talk:Nontrinitarianism/References, instead of waving the whole manual of Wikipedia in front of me, I'm asking you to show it to me.	0.000602	0	0
or dead “@Royceda59: 😂 Word RT @TAXSTONE: If ya moms calling the cops after she ain't heard from you for four days you probably pussy”	0.891793	1	1
"Well, yes. Sorry, as a non-expert, non-German speaker (like most English-speaking Wiki readers), these two powerful ships - as equipped - were less than battleships (for whatever reason), and were not intended to be used as such by the Kriegsmarine. They were, I suggest, intended to see off cruiser escorts and destroy convoys. To me, to call them ""battleships"" is confusing - they were not the equal of the ""Bismarcks"" nor even of the ""KG5s"". They certainly had the capability to be upgraded to ""proper"" battleships, it was a design feature and, I think, work did start on the Gneisenau. I accept that the German term ""Schlachtkreuzer"" translates directly into ""battleship"", so what? This is the English language Wiki and should convey meaning to English speakers. ""Battlecruisers"" were at a disadvantage to ""battleships"": see Hood and Scharnhorst - and to me, that's the point. Perhaps English/ German understandings of the term have diverged, and it's a language issue. After all the Graf Spee, Scheer and Lutzow/ Deutschland have had differing descriptions in English (""pocket battleship"" or ""heavy cruiser"") and German (""panzerschiff""). I had thought that the accepted way forward was to explain the differing views, when appropriate. Lastly, I object to the insinuation (perhaps not a serious one) that, because expert(?) comments on one side of the debate are not right here, the debates that have been carried on elsewhere (above, below and elsewhere) can be ignored. "	0.000693	0	0
you deliberately ignored my point 1) above for the fourth time and you continue to grossly misrepresent my (and others) arguments. In addition, not only do you insult me and others by consistently accusing us of racism/bias/religious bias but this also constitute your sole argument in this discussion. Consequently I must conclude that discussing with you is absolutely pointless and so we will resort to wikipedia's rule concerning the matter at hand. We shall simply vote on the issue. For the sake of peace, I will also ignore your attacks and will continue to wonder why you have never considered writing something on Xerxes' legacy in modern Iran. But then again, everything indicates that you only want to make a fuss and accuse everyone of racism.	0.002464	0	0
"\|result=keep (and possibly merge)}} Page Creation So, I started the page. This is probably going to get heated, some people accusing me of saying the Course is a ""hoax"" and all that. But I think this is an issue worthy of a page on Wikipedia because this is an important aspect of the Course. This might be interesting and beneficial. This article needs to be merged with the ACIM article or deleted It's an issue worthy of a section of the A Course In Miracles page. It definitely isn't worth a separate article. If, as you suggest, Jesus was a source, then it deserves to be part of that article. If He wasn't, then it doesn't deserve to be anywhere. Either way, it doesn't need a separate page. -...wha? Well, that's completely just an opinion on your part. Another member and I have been discussing this on the main A Course In Miracles page. We both agreed that this deserves its own page as the topic is too expansive to maintain within the already lengthy main ACIM page. Have you taken a look at the other aspects of ACIM that have pages of their own? This certainly deserves its own page as well. And I might add that this page is not about whether I say the Course is channeled/scribed from Jesus literally. It is intended as the beginnings of an article about what is actually said in the Course and the different perspectives among ""students"" and ""teachers"" of the Course. Whether I myself believe one way or another has no bearing on this topic or the page itself. The existing ACIM main article is already quite long, and is intended more to be a summary of ACIM (believe it or not). This topic is clearly a more in depth treatment of one aspect of the philosophy of ACIM than the main article, and may require its own separate long article in order to treat this subject properly. My sense is, why not give this article a couple of weeks to settle and develop before making any clear determination about where it belongs (or doesn't belong)? - I concur. The ACIM page is quite large, and this issue is quite large. Removed ""Merge"" notice I removed the ""merge"" notice. So far, it is three to one that this should remain its own article. If someone thinks I should give it more time, then please replace the ""merge"" notice. ""Exposing a hoax"" (Copied and pasted from discussion on main ACIM page.) I think there is a huge misunderstanding here. I have never used the word ""hoax."" It appears to me that you and some others who have discussed this with me, seem to think I am attempting to expose the Course, and now Catholicism, as a hoax. If you understand what I am talking about with regard to symbols, then you understand that there is no intention to ""expose a hoax"" on my part. Is math a hoax to use ""5"" all the while there are no ""5"" characters out there in our physical world? I could stand here and go, ""Well, you know, math is all a lie, a hoax, because there really are no 5's. They've lied to you."" Or I can say, ""The human mind cannot comprehend the principles expressed in math without use of those symbols, such as the symbol '5'."" This is all I'm saying about the Course and Catholicism. If, as I believe, there was never literally a man who lived and was known as Jesus (and I'm not passionate about this topic one way or another, actually), then what I am saying is that even for the Catholic Church, Jesus is ultimately just a symbol. If the Catholic Church can be seen as ""math,"" then Jesus is their ""5"". Do you get what I mean? The symbol of ""Jesus"" stands for something that is very real, though the symbol itself might not have actually existed in concrete, physical reality. The ""Jesus"" in Catholicism (and I'm a former Catholic) often stood for persecution, suffering, agony, pain, and there is little argument from most that Catholicism brought exactly this to the world in many ways. Look at the Inquisition, and all the other horrible things the church did. And, for them, they did it in the name of ""Jesus."" For them, Jesus symbolizes the need to do all these things. The things they did in the name of the symbol are very real; though the symbol might not have actually existed in concrete, physical reality on this planet. What this is	0.000645	0	0
" That's much better! All you need now is to include your references. A reference can be added at the end of any sentence it supports (this is called inline citation. If after reading the instructions in that link you are unsure how to format an inline citation, you can also alternatively include your sources under a header titled ""References"". Do what you can, and I'll help fix any that are incorrectly formatted. bons mots "	0.000716	0	0
Peoples personal opinions, sourced or not, famous or not, are irrelevant to the subject.	0.000698	0	0
" I TAKE OFFENSE! I take great offense that some pompous, sanctimonious twit thinks that no one should be allowed to express appreciation for women like the Gibson Girl as the ""fine-featured"" and ""achingly beautiful"" creatures that they are. I don't know what kind of totalitarian feminazi dystopian agenda you are trying to foist on people, but don't do it here! This encyclopedia is based on free speech and a free exchange of information, not bogus political correctness and schoolmarmish thought-policing. I'll take a Gibson Girl over you anyday!"	0.421191	1	1
0k thanks because even i didn't know whats the process.yes even i agree wikipedia is a place for providing accurate information.one more thing how do you make those images of tulu script or for that matter any script.do you write them down and click the photo or use some software.(i apologise if i am bothering you with too many questions)	0.000614	0	0
Bingo. Now fuck off and take your stinks with you (hopefully).	0.998152	1	1
@HeilSidious @BreezByYa LOL that Caitlyn.. "Can't carry 3 retards"	0.854311	1	1
MILLINOS OF HUNJAN looking at hunjan template not just me other hunjan will fight back, your concept of art bull of shit!! 86.166.250.11 tharkarn and what waste man!	0.966352	1	1
" I have answered all the points, tendentious though most of them were. Now, what do ""Pipesian"" and ""Munafiq"" mean, please? "	0.00061	0	0
Or you can look at the Merriam-Webster definition:	0.000635	0	0
" His idea can be seen from the first three (of six) Chapters in his ""Contents"". In particular in Chapter II.3 he defines his normal algorithm (see sub-section below) in terms of a set of symbols that form words, and a method using substitution rules to create new but valid words. Although this sounds exactly like a ""recursive language"" (""Equivalence of a type 0 grammar to a Turing Machine"" cf Hopcroft and Ullman p. 221, Introduction to Automata theory, Languages and Computation, Addison-Wesley, 1979) nowhere do Hopcroft and Ullman cite Markov, neither in their index nor in their bibliography. Chapter I. LETTERS, ALPHABETS, WORDS 1. Letters 2. Alphabets 3. Words 4. Entries 5. Links and chains 6. Translations Chapter II. THE NOTION OF ALGORITHM 1. Algorithms in alphabets 2. Examples of algorithms 3. Normal algorithms 4. Examples of normal algorithms 5. The principle of normalization Chapter III. CONSTRUCTION OF NORMAL ALGORITHMS 1. Extension of an algorithm 2. Closure of an algorithm 3. Composition of algorithms 4. Combination of algorithms 5. Branching of algorithms 6. Reiteration of algorithms 7. Translation of an algorithm 8. Some algorithms connected with matrices Nutshell description of Markov's definition of his ""normal algorithm"" (pp.63ff) In particular, the notion ""2."" of ""steps of local nature"" appear also in Blass and Gurevich with regards to Kolmogorov-Uspensky (KU) machines: Gurevich proposed to Uspensky that "" 'every computation, performing only one restricted local action at a time, can be viewed as (not only being simulated by, but actually being) the computation of an appropriate KU machine.' Uspensky concurred."" (Blass, Gurevich 2003, p. 10) Markov's definition: ""1. Separate elementary steps, each of which will be performed according to one of these rules..."" ""2. ...steps of local nature ..."" [as opposed to ""integral nature"" ... he means that the algorithm won't change more than a certain number of symbols to the left or right of the observed word/symbol ] ""3. Rules for the substitution formulas ..."" 1) order given is their preferred order of use 2) apply substitution to the first entry of the left-hand member ""4. Definite prescription for termination..."" 1) a means to distinguish a ""concluding substitution"" 2) ""simple"" ""5. [He defines the above as a ""normal algorithm""] ""6. [the ""scheme"" of the algorithm is the list of the substitution rules.]"	0.000702	0	0
"The link you put forward as an argument (http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definition/Serbian) is citing Wikipedia as its source. We are discussing the accuracy of the Wikipedia article, you have created a circle. That is like saying I am right because I am right. It doesn't prove anything. Miroslav Radman, a Croat, is a member of the French Academy of Sciences, does that make him French? I also do not want to start a ""nationalist"" argument with you so let us stay focused on facts. I will not revert the article until we sort things out. I agree with you that Andric was both a Croatian and a Serbian writer, but the issue here is his ethnicity because the article is about the Serbian nation. If you would write a novel in German, that would make you a German writer, but not a German by ethnicity (even if you would be a German nationalist). You can not choose your ethnicity just like you can not choose your race, it is something you are born with. People can be of mixed ethnicity, but that is not the case here, you can not have two nationalities at one time. Btw. thank you for trying to improve my work on Wikipedia, I will read the tips as soon as I can. "	0.001199	0	0
@jon_wayne_miles you better of called that kid a pussy!	0.963409	1	1
\Archive user talk:Steve espinola	0.000776	0	0
we dont like u from wat I've read alot of people dont like wat ur doing (deleting well written articles) u should be taken off wikipedia.I guess u will block me for speakin the truth!	0.076123	0	0
In the end we will stick with the most common, sensible name, which is Burma.	0.000596	0	0
Final Goodbye I'm an idiot. It has been figured out by me. After countless blocks and sockpuppets I am saying goodbye to Wikipedia. This will probably be good, considering my bad contributions, but as we say goodbye, think of my good. As a final goodbye these accounts:	0.039809	0	0
Be warned. Retribution is ongoing and the editors are serious about getting those who disagree with the POV pushing agenda banned in open retribution for the complaint by any means possible. I've seen this before with other victims. I would have advised not to waste time going up against career editors but you kind of got entrapped so I weighed in as I have little to lose. Which is why many experts have lost interest in editing here. Expertise means nothing.	0.002045	0	0
@DanielDavidLee @xoxoShima ya girl is a slimy ass hoe. get her under control and tell her to stop spraying bullshit out her mouth all day	0.995959	1	1
@KazAtta he jus need to go to brazil get himself a bad brazilian bitch and jus relax	0.989466	1	1
"Welcome! Hello, Nauvalridha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! (talk•Email) "	0.000628	0	0
*Because some dick insists that Ned Holness doesn't have german blood.	0.931623	1	1
" WP:BLPSPS: ""Never use self-published sources—including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and tweets—as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject (see below)."" "	0.00069	0	0
It's this hoe pics I'm looking at she got her ass out in 20pics then got 5 with her son....these hoes crazy	0.969019	1	1
Introduction This is where people can comment on my user page. I invite comments of any sort providing they comply with the standard wiki guidelines. In other words comment on my insanity or naivity. Whatever. Or tell me you agree with me. Or don't even bother with it. After all there are more intellectual and worth wile places just in this wiki alone that deserve your undevided attention. Why wast your time here on my humble user page? Well, what are you still doing here? Go find something useful to do will you? Sheeeh! Some people. But, really, all seriousness aside, feel welcome to comment here if you really are that bored.	0.005402	0	0
You're an idiot. Yeah, you blocked me because I used Action Replay codes on Diamond, how mature. Get out of my life.	0.985272	1	1
That summary is what everyone is butthurt over? Jeebus christmas. Who really cares if someone questions whether someone else is a sock? If you're not a sock, say so, and move on. Unless one is proven to be a sock, this kind of idle speculation happens all the time. It should not dissuade editors who like to actually write article from writing articles. Don Martin is barely notable at best, let's all move on.	0.175481	1	0
I like the politically-correct, liberal nigger lover, even less. Comprende	0.880018	1	1
" Thanks for ""Pomaks"". I hope that PMK1 will agree that this alternative name is a fact. As for your example with Lipka Tatars, it's interesting and let see how it is applicable in our case: As I see, the only argue was about the title of the article - Lithuanian Tatars or Lipka Tatars. In fact, in the artice is clearly explained that ""The name Lipka is derived from the old Crimean Tatar name of Lithuania."" It was chosen the name by Tatar origin (""Lipka"") as a title, but the alternative name is mentioned in the text. I didn't noticed some argues or evidences that there are alternative names as ""Russian Tatars"", ""Ukrainian Tatars"", ""Latvian Tatars"". Concerning ""Polish Tatars"", it is mentioned in the text ""Polish Tatars"" (and ""Polish-Lithuanian Tatars""). It would be interesting to look about some sources about hypothetical existing of such alternative names (""Russian Tatars"", ""Ukrainian Tatars"", ""Latvian Tatars"") in the past or in the present. I am sure that if they exist, we can add this useful information in the article. It would be very good test for our case, too. However, until then the good example with this group is hypothetical. "	0.000574	0	0
Gogo Dodo is a rogue admin that has sex with his father	0.984676	1	1
I spruced things up a bit, so maybe lil' Pu'unene don't gotta to be no orphan no more...	0.016431	0	0
" Another use of ""a/an"" Compare ""I have a little trouble with my kids"" versus ""I have little trouble with my kids."" In context, the two sentences have virtually opposite meanings, though the difference lies entirely in the presence or absence of the indefinite article. I wonder what mechanism is going on here, and whether it can be mentioned in the article. "	0.000666	0	0
" No information on the ""conspiracy"" that states the cyanide was added before the Tylenol even hit factories and was covered up by using a murder news story? Or what about contradictory statements on the length it takes for cyanide to destroy the gel by various authorities?"	0.000804	0	0
" I agree. My only objection would be an attempt to stick an unqualified conspiracy theorist label on anybody. That term is a code word for ""kooky person"". If Glenn Beck believes certain things, and we can prove that, that is fine. Say ""Glenn Beck has stated that he believes in X"" (with a reliable source attached) where X is a specific assertion. Let the reader decide whether X is kooky or not. "	0.000742	0	0
"I don't think this phenomenon is ""photosensitive epilepsy"" which would have caused the guy watching the game to have had an epileptic seizure, instead of dropping into a catatonic state like he seemed to do. I tried to remove this line but it got put back in, I'm not all that familiar with editing wikipedia. 11:18, 12 April 2006 "	0.001268	0	0
" HBO content this article needs further review because of some parts were taken from the TV series ""Rome""."	0.00053	0	0
who who cares? You're a dick! Jackass!	0.995906	1	1
Can we delete the one I uploaded?	0.000958	0	0
" INRConvert is the real architect behind INR Convert. He could probably help with the technical details. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= "	0.000571	0	0
Oh, in this case it seems that you guys are just blocking me because you do not want me to make any changes which you do not want. If you say that my links are not recognised, then how about yours? It is not convincing as well. I do not need to feel ashamed because what I did, I am doing, and what I will do is reasonable. Please look more carefully with your eyes at the graph which is located in the link posted below.	0.000704	0	0
Well I apologize it the dismbiguation was premature, but I don't regard it as particularly controversial as it was sorting pages which had been suggested as a redirect target already. I've actually not been recently criticised for my use of references (except in 'under construction' pages). I don't think there have been too many consensus-based issues recently either, except when people have been using sneaky redirects to avoid an AfD. As I've said before, I'm happy if articles get deleted, but not if it's done sneakily and against policy.	0.000578	0	0
Where vacuum exists in the Atmosphere, air is sucked in. Where vacuum exists in Wikipedia (lack of active experts), the clueless and illogical are sucked in (I'm trying to be polite...). Databases are very common. Everybody is familiar with the term, and too many are not aware of the extent of the area and consider themselves experts. It includes many areas of expertise, and a non expert should not mess with article text's meaning. I checked and found that the article was bad until mid 2011, and then got a good boost by experts. However, they do not seem to be active lately, and the clueless try to takeover, unaware of the harm they can cause. Some tags are unnecessary, and many comments here do not make sense. 209.144.63.76	0.005573	0	0
" Try Nazi/Evil Menacing Insane Totalitarian Terroristism, that seems to fit. Don't see how you can be against dictatorship/totalitarianism at all. Me, I like the idea and feel of dictatorship but when it comes down to real life I'm all for freedom and equality. I'm really pro-freedom of religion/speech, and yes I'm pro-freedom of speech in what you call the way ""the rest of America"" believes in it, which is freedom to speak out against anything and not just your way of freedom to speak if your speaking pro-whatever the govt's beliefs happen to be. Love the hippie movement, by the way, what religion are you going to force everybody to do, and what races are you exactly against? Also, who exactky are you trying to help with this idea, you and your other insane evil dictator friends, because there are about several billion other people here too who dont appreciate getting every right taken away from them and having somebody try to tell them who they are and what they shuld do and that their dreams aren;t important and that they should be freaking governmant scapegoats and sacrifice their right to speak and everything else jsut so that a group of like a dozen self-absorbed people can get what they want. Imagine what those billions of people are feeling every day not even being able to freaking have their own indivduality and e=not even being able to live here in peace. No one came here to live the way other people wanted them to, they came here to live THEIR,note the word THEIR, lives. Peace out, brother. Try getting billions of normal life-living people to accept your stupid idea. yeah,right."	0.408832	1	0
Thank you! Nick, thank you for supporting my List of atheist Nobel laureates. I am leaving Wikipedia. Goodbye!	0.001238	0	0
Stephan, the evidence was provided to congress by the scientists. The majority agreed that the Satellites were the best and unless I am very much mistaken the satellite is the only dataset that is corroborated by an independent dataset in the Meteorological balloons. Please keep this on the science and stop digressing into irrelevant political rhetoric.	0.000596	0	0
@cristiannt_ bitch am not gonna shut shit up feel free to join them	0.9943	1	1
what the motherhell are you talking about? i deleted the lacrosse lie? you son need to get your facts straight i do not stand for this bullshit pigshit and treason.. no taxation without motherfucking representation son! Broad	0.996219	1	1
"There are many more linguistic features that are exclusively shared with Italic (mostly Sabellic) but non existing in Keltic (not going to waste my time listing all of them) Your the ""expert"" so keep on truckin and always remember if you "	0.010324	0	0
" Also, to be clear, I understand the word ""progressive"" is used in their About section but I'm not convinced that they mean it in the traditional political sense. "	0.000549	0	0
" I usually just put that some matter ""received a great deal of publicity"", provide some references and let it go at that. For instance, in the Doris Kearns Goodwin article, there are 14 articles railing about her plagiarism many years after the fact. None of them get quoted and exist merely to support the assert that the issue received a lot of publicity because none of them provides new information. "	0.000563	0	0
Talk:Seven Churches Visitation121.54.32.106 Talk:Seven Churches Visitation	0.000631	0	0
@WeBeatBitches thats trash, its ot?	0.814501	1	1
Comment from Kansai Goma I still have more accounts on here which you will never find because I am too smart for you dickheads and you are a dumass. fuck ya!	0.995198	1	1
" Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Elizabeth R. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (talk) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings."	0.0007	0	0
I am not following any guideline blindly. I am arguing for the removal of bias from the article, which some editors are insisting must remain because that particular word is used in a source. That argument is entirely specious. Yes, there are circumstances where you'd report the exact word. This is not one of them. 2.220.204.70	0.000695	0	0
I'm pretty sure the dmv won't let me take a new pic, but a bitch might accidentally lose my license again where they have to take a new pic	0.895187	1	1
Young jezzy dat nigguh	0.615756	1	1
RT @queenthottie_x3: So proud of mahanain ♡ she still a hoe tho	0.07052	0	1
“@_hellMEL: Men hop in they feelings much quicker than women.” Not me 😈 I hop in ya bitch	0.987057	1	1
@__Black_Jesus bitch u know what I mean spell champ these nuts	0.992782	1	1
Oh, and I'm back, bitch. No one walks all over me ever again. Ever.	0.991671	1	1
RT @ImNeverChillin: BITCH FOR WHO, GAP? RT "@porkhub: I'm a model Yall bitches can't tell me nothin" http://t.co/LDOTnl5pNa	0.961861	1	1
Hi Fuck you, Faggot.	0.998598	1	1
" Agreed with RegentsPark, KnowledgeHegemony2, Indopug, Shahab, Wilhelm meis and Fowler. Archive this discussion. '''''' "	0.000609	0	0
Fuck You wikipedia. the edits i did we're real dickheads	0.997383	1	1
Are you that scared? )	0.00814	0	0
Category needed Surprised there isn't already a Category:Fashion Designer? 11:38, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)	0.000609	0	0
Your censorship It is not vandalism to criticize someone on their talk page.	0.003784	0	0
Do these glasses make my cunt look fat? http://t.co/pGSVqt9P2D	0.800957	1	1
If we can at least have agreement on the use of appropriate global sources then we might be able to do some constructive editing to produce an article that is relevant and understandable for everyone and not just Americans.	0.000532	0	0

RT @ohhdatsbrucie: I can't be worried bout no bitch cause that bitch could be somewhere sucking dick

0.998264

1

Template Why not include the Bio link in the template? - it seems to me that it aids navigation...

0.000655

0

Curb your enthusiasm? Anjelah appeared in Season 8 episode 4 of Curb your enthusiasm, 'The Smiley Face as Mimi, the niece of a restaurant hostess Larry was dating.

0.000657

0

" Hmmm... I would like to respond to this, but I've just been blocked indefinitely! Seems someone objected to a posting I made about inappropriate sourcing on 'totalitarianism' by neocons... viz: ""Sockpuppetry Docmartincohen, Wikigiraffes, Dremeraldgibb, NoPointofView, Wikisquirrels all confirmed as the same already-blocked account and blocked accordingly. Wikipedia is not a platform for professional disputes or attacks on living persons. IP edits are also easily spotted and will be reverted and blocked as necessary - David Gerard (talk ) 03:41, 27 July 2008 (UTC ' In fact, several people use this computer... Even if it were true, this seems a long delayed adminstrative sanction against historical activities...? Scarcely serving any legitimate 'prevention of abuse' purpose. I've checked up: ther first 3 were blocked several months ago, Wikisquirrels who has made no controversial edits at all is being blocked today but has not made any edits for several months. My own account, - of course- is beyond reproach! I was just getting into the careful copy checking of the philosphy pages, when I came across a fake quotation about Hitler's views of Marxism, which I found sourced to an American neo-conservative, whose views were quite obviously part of a politically directed campaign. I raised the matter on WIkiedia review and lo! If anyone can help to get the block lifted, I'll be pleased to get back to this interesting issue and provide some references. 90.62.158.145 (as docmartincohen)"

0.001748

0

grow up.''' Kind regards

0.444924

1

@Cuner Makes you a pussy. Making stupid internet threats. You're a child and if it is about you which idk if it is, it's probably deserved.

0.995914

1

As far as I'm aware there's no precedent to suggest that an arbitrator who holds a strong view in a case is unable to enforce the actual literal decision of the arbitration committee. In fact, it's a rather odd suggestion - if arbcom members with strong feelings were unable to enforce the literal rulings of arbcom, it'd be a bit loony. Eric was very very clearly attempting to poke the bear. He knew he was under a sanction, and even if he thought it was a stupid sanction, he clearly and intentionally violated it to see if ArbCom was able or willing to enforce its rulings against him. I imagine if he agreed to abide by the sanction and apologized, it wouldn't be long before he was unblocked.

0.000944

0

" I don't want it anymore either. Sorry. BAM "

0.000876

0

Hi. I was talking about the article about J Junyadi in Hungarian language, http://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunyadi_J%C3%A1nos, where his Cuman origin is considered aa being proved, even if there are many neutral sources which claim his Romanian (Vlach) descent; i was asking you, as Hungarian language speaker to try to improve that article ( )

0.00056

0

yo hoe will get slayed . 🔪🔪

0.81418

1

Yeah hoe

0.06743

0

1

RT @rebellious_midy: Ugly bitches definitely disguste me 😖 ewww yuck!

0.991455

1

Tyranny of averages I've created an article that is the converse of this/the law of averages, and welcome any comments/contributions. I've not yet x-ref'd it, in case people feel it ought to simply be merged and a redirect placed in its stead.

0.000641

0

John F. Kennedy Assassination

0.002309

0

" Unfortunately I dont think you did it right. You can't blank an entire article because three passages out of the whole thing, which is about 25% of the total, MIGHT be a copyright violation. I fixed your error and rewrote every passage sourced to the ourcampaigns website. • Lawrence Cohen "

0.00078

0

Well, since you're bending over backwards I guess I could grudgingly live with that wording. - MrX

0.0013

0

< who the heck wrote that crap _ explain why a forum devoted to Schapelle Corby should not be on her Wiki. What sets the other sites apart from mine ? My forum was the first and only Schapelle support site for months. Who the heck are you to say it should got here. You can remove it everyday and I will be back the next day to add it again. FFS get a life.

0.839437

1

This is just one of my fun socks. My real sock is real close to becoming an admin, will get someone to nominate him in the next few weeks.

0.003614

0

I realize that PageantUpdater has let her frustration get the better of her, but I think she is an important contributor and I think she deserves another chance.

0.00079

0

" Bossburg Tracks I see that the Bossburg tracksfamous because one of the track-maker's feet seems to have suffered from some sort of clubbing deformityare mentioned, but the discussion of the subject is limited to the usual ""where and when the trail was found"" info and then the well-known (at least in bf circles) quote about nobody being ""sick"" enough to have hoaxed it, etc. I have an article from Skeptic magazine, though, about how there were some suspicious aspects to its origin, the seemingly non-sensical path the tracks took, as well as the fact that someone had hoaxed a film of an injured, limping bigfoot either before or after the discovery (a significant distinction I need to recheck); in any case, the Bossburg incident is more complicated than presented in the Evidence article. For the longest time, I thought the whole thing represented very compelling evidenceif not the *most* compelling evidencesupporting Bigfoot's existence, but there actually *is* a cogent ""hoax"" counter-argument. Should this be summarized and included? "

0.000667

0

Nah, thats okay, I'll just change IPs, just keep being a dick. I hope you like sucking on your own, thats if you got one.

0.987106

1

You are a fool if you think Wikipedia is a respected entitity in this world. So, shut

0.957026

1

Fuck you Greenman Fucking piece of shit. You don't have the dignity of having your name on wikipedia. You deserve no respect what so ever. Fucking moron. Giving Jose Eduardo dos Santos false information on Wikipedia like saying that he is born in Luanda and as a PHD LPD YXZ degree in Timbacktu. FUCK YOU COMMUNIST LOVER By the way I am shitting in my pans for not being allowed to post on wikipedia. You can suck my cock, or probably not as I don't trust your mouth dick head.

0.998713

1

You don't know me, but I'm your bra. RT @HuffingtonPost: Doobie Brothers member Michael McDonald says he'll "come out as a tranny"

0.364155

1

Na its not goona go to FA, just leave it. Thriller 25 cant have its own page, then we leave it.

0.002644

0

Why isn't the article called SLOVENIAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE or SLOVENIAN WAR OF LIBERATION?

0.000737

0

That is all very nice and good cyclic logic, but I would like a second opinion. Otherwise, as I have said, without acutally putting the offence in front of me it can be interpreted as weasel words and intimidation tactics. Also if I have bothered you so much, then for the reason of conflict of interest as well, I deserve a second opinion, and not from one of your admin clique buddies either. Also you seem to know what violation I have commited with Talk:Nontrinitarianism/References, instead of waving the whole manual of Wikipedia in front of me, I'm asking you to show it to me.

0.000602

0

or dead “@Royceda59: 😂 Word RT @TAXSTONE: If ya moms calling the cops after she ain't heard from you for four days you probably pussy”

0.891793

1

"Well, yes. Sorry, as a non-expert, non-German speaker (like most English-speaking Wiki readers), these two powerful ships - as equipped - were less than battleships (for whatever reason), and were not intended to be used as such by the Kriegsmarine. They were, I suggest, intended to see off cruiser escorts and destroy convoys. To me, to call them ""battleships"" is confusing - they were not the equal of the ""Bismarcks"" nor even of the ""KG5s"". They certainly had the capability to be upgraded to ""proper"" battleships, it was a design feature and, I think, work did start on the Gneisenau. I accept that the German term ""Schlachtkreuzer"" translates directly into ""battleship"", so what? This is the English language Wiki and should convey meaning to English speakers. ""Battlecruisers"" were at a disadvantage to ""battleships"": see Hood and Scharnhorst - and to me, that's the point. Perhaps English/ German understandings of the term have diverged, and it's a language issue. After all the Graf Spee, Scheer and Lutzow/ Deutschland have had differing descriptions in English (""pocket battleship"" or ""heavy cruiser"") and German (""panzerschiff""). I had thought that the accepted way forward was to explain the differing views, when appropriate. Lastly, I object to the insinuation (perhaps not a serious one) that, because expert(?) comments on one side of the debate are not right here, the debates that have been carried on elsewhere (above, below and elsewhere) can be ignored. "

0.000693

0

you deliberately ignored my point 1) above for the fourth time and you continue to grossly misrepresent my (and others) arguments. In addition, not only do you insult me and others by consistently accusing us of racism/bias/religious bias but this also constitute your sole argument in this discussion. Consequently I must conclude that discussing with you is absolutely pointless and so we will resort to wikipedia's rule concerning the matter at hand. We shall simply vote on the issue. For the sake of peace, I will also ignore your attacks and will continue to wonder why you have never considered writing something on Xerxes' legacy in modern Iran. But then again, everything indicates that you only want to make a fuss and accuse everyone of racism.

0.002464

0

"|result=keep (and possibly merge)}} Page Creation So, I started the page. This is probably going to get heated, some people accusing me of saying the Course is a ""hoax"" and all that. But I think this is an issue worthy of a page on Wikipedia because this is an important aspect of the Course. This might be interesting and beneficial. This article needs to be merged with the ACIM article or deleted It's an issue worthy of a section of the A Course In Miracles page. It definitely isn't worth a separate article. If, as you suggest, Jesus was a source, then it deserves to be part of that article. If He wasn't, then it doesn't deserve to be anywhere. Either way, it doesn't need a separate page. -...wha? Well, that's completely just an opinion on your part. Another member and I have been discussing this on the main A Course In Miracles page. We both agreed that this deserves its own page as the topic is too expansive to maintain within the already lengthy main ACIM page. Have you taken a look at the other aspects of ACIM that have pages of their own? This certainly deserves its own page as well. And I might add that this page is not about whether I say the Course is channeled/scribed from Jesus literally. It is intended as the beginnings of an article about what is actually said in the Course and the different perspectives among ""students"" and ""teachers"" of the Course. Whether I myself believe one way or another has no bearing on this topic or the page itself. The existing ACIM main article is already quite long, and is intended more to be a summary of ACIM (believe it or not). This topic is clearly a more in depth treatment of one aspect of the philosophy of ACIM than the main article, and may require its own separate long article in order to treat this subject properly. My sense is, why not give this article a couple of weeks to settle and develop before making any clear determination about where it belongs (or doesn't belong)? - I concur. The ACIM page is quite large, and this issue is quite large. Removed ""Merge"" notice I removed the ""merge"" notice. So far, it is three to one that this should remain its own article. If someone thinks I should give it more time, then please replace the ""merge"" notice. ""Exposing a hoax"" (Copied and pasted from discussion on main ACIM page.) I think there is a huge misunderstanding here. I have never used the word ""hoax."" It appears to me that you and some others who have discussed this with me, seem to think I am attempting to expose the Course, and now Catholicism, as a hoax. If you understand what I am talking about with regard to symbols, then you understand that there is no intention to ""expose a hoax"" on my part. Is math a hoax to use ""5"" all the while there are no ""5"" characters out there in our physical world? I could stand here and go, ""Well, you know, math is all a lie, a hoax, because there really are no 5's. They've lied to you."" Or I can say, ""The human mind cannot comprehend the principles expressed in math without use of those symbols, such as the symbol '5'."" This is all I'm saying about the Course and Catholicism. If, as I believe, there was never literally a man who lived and was known as Jesus (and I'm not passionate about this topic one way or another, actually), then what I am saying is that even for the Catholic Church, Jesus is ultimately just a symbol. If the Catholic Church can be seen as ""math,"" then Jesus is their ""5"". Do you get what I mean? The symbol of ""Jesus"" stands for something that is very real, though the symbol itself might not have actually existed in concrete, physical reality. The ""Jesus"" in Catholicism (and I'm a former Catholic) often stood for persecution, suffering, agony, pain, and there is little argument from most that Catholicism brought exactly this to the world in many ways. Look at the Inquisition, and all the other horrible things the church did. And, for them, they did it in the name of ""Jesus."" For them, Jesus symbolizes the need to do all these things. The things they did in the name of the symbol are very real; though the symbol might not have actually existed in concrete, physical reality on this planet. What this is

0.000645

0

" That's much better! All you need now is to include your references. A reference can be added at the end of any sentence it supports (this is called inline citation. If after reading the instructions in that link you are unsure how to format an inline citation, you can also alternatively include your sources under a header titled ""References"". Do what you can, and I'll help fix any that are incorrectly formatted. bons mots "

0.000716

0

Peoples personal opinions, sourced or not, famous or not, are irrelevant to the subject.

0.000698

0

" I TAKE OFFENSE! I take great offense that some pompous, sanctimonious twit thinks that no one should be allowed to express appreciation for women like the Gibson Girl as the ""fine-featured"" and ""achingly beautiful"" creatures that they are. I don't know what kind of totalitarian feminazi dystopian agenda you are trying to foist on people, but don't do it here! This encyclopedia is based on free speech and a free exchange of information, not bogus political correctness and schoolmarmish thought-policing. I'll take a Gibson Girl over you anyday!"

0.421191

1

0k thanks because even i didn't know whats the process.yes even i agree wikipedia is a place for providing accurate information.one more thing how do you make those images of tulu script or for that matter any script.do you write them down and click the photo or use some software.(i apologise if i am bothering you with too many questions)

0.000614

0

Bingo. Now fuck off and take your stinks with you (hopefully).

0.998152

1

@HeilSidious @BreezByYa LOL that Caitlyn.. "Can't carry 3 retards"

0.854311

1

MILLINOS OF HUNJAN looking at hunjan template not just me other hunjan will fight back, your concept of art bull of shit!! 86.166.250.11 tharkarn and what waste man!

0.966352

1

" I have answered all the points, tendentious though most of them were. Now, what do ""Pipesian"" and ""Munafiq"" mean, please? "

0.00061

0

Or you can look at the Merriam-Webster definition:

0.000635

0

" His idea can be seen from the first three (of six) Chapters in his ""Contents"". In particular in Chapter II.3 he defines his normal algorithm (see sub-section below) in terms of a set of symbols that form words, and a method using substitution rules to create new but valid words. Although this sounds exactly like a ""recursive language"" (""Equivalence of a type 0 grammar to a Turing Machine"" cf Hopcroft and Ullman p. 221, Introduction to Automata theory, Languages and Computation, Addison-Wesley, 1979) nowhere do Hopcroft and Ullman cite Markov, neither in their index nor in their bibliography. Chapter I. LETTERS, ALPHABETS, WORDS 1. Letters 2. Alphabets 3. Words 4. Entries 5. Links and chains 6. Translations Chapter II. THE NOTION OF ALGORITHM 1. Algorithms in alphabets 2. Examples of algorithms 3. Normal algorithms 4. Examples of normal algorithms 5. The principle of normalization Chapter III. CONSTRUCTION OF NORMAL ALGORITHMS 1. Extension of an algorithm 2. Closure of an algorithm 3. Composition of algorithms 4. Combination of algorithms 5. Branching of algorithms 6. Reiteration of algorithms 7. Translation of an algorithm 8. Some algorithms connected with matrices Nutshell description of Markov's definition of his ""normal algorithm"" (pp.63ff) In particular, the notion ""2."" of ""steps of local nature"" appear also in Blass and Gurevich with regards to Kolmogorov-Uspensky (KU) machines: Gurevich proposed to Uspensky that "" 'every computation, performing only one restricted local action at a time, can be viewed as (not only being simulated by, but actually being) the computation of an appropriate KU machine.' Uspensky concurred."" (Blass, Gurevich 2003, p. 10) Markov's definition: ""1. Separate elementary steps, each of which will be performed according to one of these rules..."" ""2. ...steps of local nature ..."" [as opposed to ""integral nature"" ... he means that the algorithm won't change more than a certain number of symbols to the left or right of the observed word/symbol ] ""3. Rules for the substitution formulas ..."" 1) order given is their preferred order of use 2) apply substitution to the first entry of the left-hand member ""4. Definite prescription for termination..."" 1) a means to distinguish a ""concluding substitution"" 2) ""simple"" ""5. [He defines the above as a ""normal algorithm""] ""6. [the ""scheme"" of the algorithm is the list of the substitution rules.]"

0.000702

0

"The link you put forward as an argument (http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definition/Serbian) is citing Wikipedia as its source. We are discussing the accuracy of the Wikipedia article, you have created a circle. That is like saying I am right because I am right. It doesn't prove anything. Miroslav Radman, a Croat, is a member of the French Academy of Sciences, does that make him French? I also do not want to start a ""nationalist"" argument with you so let us stay focused on facts. I will not revert the article until we sort things out. I agree with you that Andric was both a Croatian and a Serbian writer, but the issue here is his ethnicity because the article is about the Serbian nation. If you would write a novel in German, that would make you a German writer, but not a German by ethnicity (even if you would be a German nationalist). You can not choose your ethnicity just like you can not choose your race, it is something you are born with. People can be of mixed ethnicity, but that is not the case here, you can not have two nationalities at one time. Btw. thank you for trying to improve my work on Wikipedia, I will read the tips as soon as I can. "

0.001199

0

@jon_wayne_miles you better of called that kid a pussy!

0.963409

1

\Archive user talk:Steve espinola

0.000776

0

we dont like u from wat I've read alot of people dont like wat ur doing (deleting well written articles) u should be taken off wikipedia.I guess u will block me for speakin the truth!

0.076123

0

In the end we will stick with the most common, sensible name, which is Burma.

0.000596

0

Final Goodbye I'm an idiot. It has been figured out by me. After countless blocks and sockpuppets I am saying goodbye to Wikipedia. This will probably be good, considering my bad contributions, but as we say goodbye, think of my good. As a final goodbye these accounts:

0.039809

0

Be warned. Retribution is ongoing and the editors are serious about getting those who disagree with the POV pushing agenda banned in open retribution for the complaint by any means possible. I've seen this before with other victims. I would have advised not to waste time going up against career editors but you kind of got entrapped so I weighed in as I have little to lose. Which is why many experts have lost interest in editing here. Expertise means nothing.

0.002045

0

@DanielDavidLee @xoxoShima ya girl is a slimy ass hoe. get her under control and tell her to stop spraying bullshit out her mouth all day

0.995959

1

@KazAtta he jus need to go to brazil get himself a bad brazilian bitch and jus relax

0.989466

1

"Welcome! Hello, Nauvalridha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! (talk•Email) "

0.000628

0

*Because some dick insists that Ned Holness doesn't have german blood.

0.931623

1

" WP:BLPSPS: ""Never use self-published sources—including but not limited to books, zines, websites, blogs, and tweets—as sources of material about a living person, unless written or published by the subject (see below)."" "

0.00069

0

It's this hoe pics I'm looking at she got her ass out in 20pics then got 5 with her son....these hoes crazy

0.969019

1

Introduction This is where people can comment on my user page. I invite comments of any sort providing they comply with the standard wiki guidelines. In other words comment on my insanity or naivity. Whatever. Or tell me you agree with me. Or don't even bother with it. After all there are more intellectual and worth wile places just in this wiki alone that deserve your undevided attention. Why wast your time here on my humble user page? Well, what are you still doing here? Go find something useful to do will you? Sheeeh! Some people. But, really, all seriousness aside, feel welcome to comment here if you really are that bored.

0.005402

0

You're an idiot. Yeah, you blocked me because I used Action Replay codes on Diamond, how mature. Get out of my life.

0.985272

1

That summary is what everyone is butthurt over? Jeebus christmas. Who really cares if someone questions whether someone else is a sock? If you're not a sock, say so, and move on. Unless one is proven to be a sock, this kind of idle speculation happens all the time. It should not dissuade editors who like to actually write article from writing articles. Don Martin is barely notable at best, let's all move on.

0.175481

1

0

I like the politically-correct, liberal nigger lover, even less. Comprende

0.880018

1

" Thanks for ""Pomaks"". I hope that PMK1 will agree that this alternative name is a fact. As for your example with Lipka Tatars, it's interesting and let see how it is applicable in our case: As I see, the only argue was about the title of the article - Lithuanian Tatars or Lipka Tatars. In fact, in the artice is clearly explained that ""The name Lipka is derived from the old Crimean Tatar name of Lithuania."" It was chosen the name by Tatar origin (""Lipka"") as a title, but the alternative name is mentioned in the text. I didn't noticed some argues or evidences that there are alternative names as ""Russian Tatars"", ""Ukrainian Tatars"", ""Latvian Tatars"". Concerning ""Polish Tatars"", it is mentioned in the text ""Polish Tatars"" (and ""Polish-Lithuanian Tatars""). It would be interesting to look about some sources about hypothetical existing of such alternative names (""Russian Tatars"", ""Ukrainian Tatars"", ""Latvian Tatars"") in the past or in the present. I am sure that if they exist, we can add this useful information in the article. It would be very good test for our case, too. However, until then the good example with this group is hypothetical. "

0.000574

0

Gogo Dodo is a rogue admin that has sex with his father

0.984676

1

I spruced things up a bit, so maybe lil' Pu'unene don't gotta to be no orphan no more...

0.016431

0

" Another use of ""a/an"" Compare ""I have a little trouble with my kids"" versus ""I have little trouble with my kids."" In context, the two sentences have virtually opposite meanings, though the difference lies entirely in the presence or absence of the indefinite article. I wonder what mechanism is going on here, and whether it can be mentioned in the article. "

0.000666

0

" No information on the ""conspiracy"" that states the cyanide was added before the Tylenol even hit factories and was covered up by using a murder news story? Or what about contradictory statements on the length it takes for cyanide to destroy the gel by various authorities?"

0.000804

0

" I agree. My only objection would be an attempt to stick an unqualified conspiracy theorist label on anybody. That term is a code word for ""kooky person"". If Glenn Beck believes certain things, and we can prove that, that is fine. Say ""Glenn Beck has stated that he believes in X"" (with a reliable source attached) where X is a specific assertion. Let the reader decide whether X is kooky or not. "

0.000742

0

"I don't think this phenomenon *is* ""photosensitive epilepsy"" which would have caused the guy watching the game to have had an epileptic seizure, instead of dropping into a catatonic state like he seemed to do. I tried to remove this line but it got put back in, I'm not all that familiar with editing wikipedia. 11:18, 12 April 2006 "

0.001268

0

" HBO content this article needs further review because of some parts were taken from the TV series ""Rome""."

0.00053

0

who who cares? You're a dick! Jackass!

0.995906

1

Can we delete the one I uploaded?

0.000958

0

" INRConvert is the real architect behind INR Convert. He could probably help with the technical details. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= "

0.000571

0

Oh, in this case it seems that you guys are just blocking me because you do not want me to make any changes which you do not want. If you say that my links are not recognised, then how about yours? It is not convincing as well. I do not need to feel ashamed because what I did, I am doing, and what I will do is reasonable. Please look more carefully with your eyes at the graph which is located in the link posted below.

0.000704

0

Well I apologize it the dismbiguation was premature, but I don't regard it as particularly controversial as it was sorting pages which had been suggested as a redirect target already. I've actually not been recently criticised for my use of references (except in 'under construction' pages). I don't think there have been too many consensus-based issues recently either, except when people have been using sneaky redirects to avoid an AfD. As I've said before, I'm happy if articles get deleted, but not if it's done sneakily and against policy.

0.000578

0

Where vacuum exists in the Atmosphere, air is sucked in. Where vacuum exists in Wikipedia (lack of active experts), the clueless and illogical are sucked in (I'm trying to be polite...). Databases are very common. Everybody is familiar with the term, and too many are not aware of the extent of the area and consider themselves experts. It includes many areas of expertise, and a non expert should not mess with article text's meaning. I checked and found that the article was bad until mid 2011, and then got a good boost by experts. However, they do not seem to be active lately, and the clueless try to takeover, unaware of the harm they can cause. Some tags are unnecessary, and many comments here do not make sense. 209.144.63.76

0.005573

0

" Try Nazi/Evil Menacing Insane Totalitarian Terroristism, that seems to fit. Don't see how you can be against dictatorship/totalitarianism at all. Me, I like the idea and feel of dictatorship but when it comes down to real life I'm all for freedom and equality. I'm really pro-freedom of religion/speech, and yes I'm pro-freedom of speech in what you call the way ""the rest of America"" believes in it, which is freedom to speak out against anything and not just your way of freedom to speak if your speaking pro-whatever the govt's beliefs happen to be. Love the hippie movement, by the way, what religion are you going to force everybody to do, and what races are you exactly against? Also, who exactky are you trying to help with this idea, you and your other insane evil dictator friends, because there are about several billion other people here too who dont appreciate getting every right taken away from them and having somebody try to tell them who they are and what they shuld do and that their dreams aren;t important and that they should be freaking governmant scapegoats and sacrifice their right to speak and everything else jsut so that a group of like a dozen self-absorbed people can get what they want. Imagine what those billions of people are feeling every day not even being able to freaking have their own indivduality and e=not even being able to live here in peace. No one came here to live the way other people wanted them to, they came here to live THEIR,note the word THEIR, lives. Peace out, brother. Try getting billions of normal life-living people to accept your stupid idea. yeah,right."

0.408832

1

0

Thank you! Nick, thank you for supporting my List of atheist Nobel laureates. I am leaving Wikipedia. Goodbye!

0.001238

0

Stephan, the evidence was provided to congress by the scientists. The majority agreed that the Satellites were the best and unless I am very much mistaken the satellite is the only dataset that is corroborated by an independent dataset in the Meteorological balloons. Please keep this on the science and stop digressing into irrelevant political rhetoric.

0.000596

0

@cristiannt_ bitch am not gonna shut shit up feel free to join them

0.9943

1

what the motherhell are you talking about? i deleted the lacrosse lie? you son need to get your facts straight i do not stand for this bullshit pigshit and treason.. no taxation without motherfucking representation son! Broad

0.996219

1

"There are many more linguistic features that are exclusively shared with Italic (mostly Sabellic) but non existing in Keltic (not going to waste my time listing all of them) Your the ""expert"" so keep on truckin and always remember if you "

0.010324

0

" Also, to be clear, I understand the word ""progressive"" is used in their About section but I'm not convinced that they mean it in the traditional political sense. "

0.000549

0

" I usually just put that some matter ""received a great deal of publicity"", provide some references and let it go at that. For instance, in the Doris Kearns Goodwin article, there are 14 articles railing about her plagiarism many years after the fact. None of them get quoted and exist merely to support the assert that the issue received a lot of publicity because none of them provides new information. "

0.000563

0

Talk:Seven Churches Visitation121.54.32.106 Talk:Seven Churches Visitation

0.000631

0

@WeBeatBitches thats trash, its ot?

0.814501

1

Comment from Kansai Goma I still have more accounts on here which you will never find because I am too smart for you dickheads and you are a dumass. fuck ya!

0.995198

1

" Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Elizabeth R. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (talk) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings."

0.0007

0

I am not following any guideline blindly. I am arguing for the removal of bias from the article, which some editors are insisting must remain because that particular word is used in a source. That argument is entirely specious. Yes, there are circumstances where you'd report the exact word. This is not one of them. 2.220.204.70

0.000695

0

I'm pretty sure the dmv won't let me take a new pic, but a bitch might accidentally lose my license again where they have to take a new pic

0.895187

1

Young jezzy dat nigguh

0.615756

1

RT @queenthottie_x3: So proud of mahanain ♡ she still a hoe tho

0.07052

0

1

“@_hellMEL: Men hop in they feelings much quicker than women.” Not me 😈 I hop in ya bitch

0.987057

1

@__Black_Jesus bitch u know what I mean spell champ these nuts

0.992782

1

Oh, and I'm back, bitch. No one walks all over me ever again. Ever.

0.991671

1

RT @ImNeverChillin: BITCH FOR WHO, GAP? RT "@porkhub: I'm a model Yall bitches can't tell me nothin" http://t.co/LDOTnl5pNa

0.961861

1

Hi Fuck you, Faggot.

0.998598

1

" Agreed with RegentsPark, KnowledgeHegemony2, Indopug, Shahab, Wilhelm meis and Fowler. Archive this discussion. '''''' "

0.000609

0

Fuck You wikipedia. the edits i did we're real dickheads

0.997383

1

Are you that scared? )

0.00814

0

Category needed Surprised there isn't already a Category:Fashion Designer? 11:38, Sep 1, 2004 (UTC)

0.000609

0

Your censorship It is not vandalism to criticize someone on their talk page.

0.003784

0

Do these glasses make my cunt look fat? http://t.co/pGSVqt9P2D

0.800957

1

If we can at least have agreement on the use of appropriate global sources then we might be able to do some constructive editing to produce an article that is relevant and understandable for everyone and not just Americans.

0.000532

0