text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
After watching the desolation of smaug I have come to the conclusion that bilbo made all other hobbits look like bitches in LOTR. | 0.680541 | 1 | 1 |
RT @T_Madison_x: A hoe ass nigga will never change | 0.975446 | 1 | 1 |
As a rollbacker, that is particularly problematic. You should be aware that editors who edit war may lose the privilege regardless of the means used to edit war. | 0.00089 | 0 | 0 |
"
Let me add a comment here in this discussion. While it certainly seems strange that jokes are included on a page concerning 'religion', dismissing it completely without some discussion and consideration would be doing a disservice. It may very well be that Bektashi culture is intimately tied to a rich collection of jokes which serve some pedagogical role in the religion. For example, if we look at this site:
http://www.alevibektasi.org/xalevis1.htm
It is written that
""X. Alevi-Bektashi Humor
Alevis and Bektashis love to use humor to mock religious legalism, hypocrisy, and those who they feel have persecuted them. This humor reveals much about Alevi-Bektashi thought. To understand their humor is to understand the Alevi-Bektashis’ approach to life, religion, and their place in society. Here are only a few examples of the hundreds of Bektashi jokes (fıkralar) that have been collected.
This first joke reflects the Alevi attitude toward the legalism of the five pillars""
The author is John Shindeldecker, and he is listed as one of the researchers on the fairly official-looking homepage
http://www.alevibektasi.org/makale_engl.htm
In this case, this material suggests that humor is an integral part of defining Bektashi culture as distinctive from other factions of Islam. Much as Zen Buddhism is characterized by the sometimes meaningless Koans or Gospel music in certain factions of Protestant Christianity. In all of these cases, I don't think it's fair to say that it's like ""adding black jokes to an article about African Americans."" This comparison is also a bit overreaching, and unwarranted. AldirmaGonul has made a good faith case for why the jokes should be placed on this page. freestylefrappe has deleted it by only saying that it's ""suspect"" and ""racist"". But given what we read from another source, this seems an overly simplified and inaccurate depiction of the ""jokes"" section. I would like to hear an argument against these lines of evidence from freestylefrappe. " | 0.000951 | 0 | 0 |
!!! FUCK YOU, SLAKR!!!
DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA DIE WIKIPEDIA | 0.993593 | 1 | 1 |
Hate when I'm in a girl city call her then she call back after I'm on the plane bitch FOH | 0.970398 | 1 | 1 |
Why are you harassing me?
No.
The arbcom decision, based on a lie, said I could only operate under one account. I was continually harassed so I switched to a new account and stopped editing under this one.
I have not broken any policies. I have not edited any of the pages I used to edit because I knew you and Mackensen would immediately seek out confrontation.
Why do you have to prove to the world that you are right, and no other opinion is allowed, after I stopped editing under Ya ya ya ya ya ya?
Similarly you refuse to accept criticism so you vandalize my talkpage and revert every attempt to start an arbcom case on a blatant series of policy violations, and then you act like I'm not permanently banned.
I let it (the arbcom case I tried to file three times) go when you began wikistalking me.
I'm switching accounts again.
You don't like it? Too bad. | 0.032103 | 0 | 0 |
really want cramers balls in your mouth huh? | 0.983467 | 1 | 1 |
"
RFC
I didn't say the sockpuppet issue wasn't relevant, I said it couldn't be proven and if he insists he's not JB it should be dropped. The stuff with JB happened around the time I started on Wikipedia and I saw a little bit of it and have to agree that they have similar editing styles. However, if we can't prove that Booyaka is JB, then we have to judge Booyaka's behavior on its own merits. If, on the other hand, we can prove that Booyaka is JB, then Booyaka can be blocked.
As for ""However when Booyaka replaced the tags and ignored the notes on the edit summary - that's when it became vandalism."" No, it's still a content dispute. It's an inappropriate action, but not vandalism. Read WP:Vandalism, especially the part about what vandalism is not. I would call replacing the tags ""Bullying or Stubbornness"". Not right, not good, but not vandalism either. Accusing someone of vandalism when they aren't vandalising takes a bad situation and makes it worse.
You said, ""There are limited editors in Australia and New Zealand, so the obtaining of third party sources is hindered severely in the time sense."" I see that, hence my advice to him to go easy on the AFDs and just use {{unreferenced}}. Not that I think he'll take my advice. However, there is a growing movement to speedy delete unsourced articles, see Wikipedia:Speedy deletion criterion for unsourced articles (which you might want to comment on).
As for your asking if I was an admin, no I am not. If you specifically wanted comment from admins and not regular users then RFC wasn't where you wanted to be. Anyone is free to present an outside opinion on any open RFC. I saw Lethaniol's comment here, and thought I'd try to help out by providing my opinion. That's all that ever comes out of an RFC, by the way; a few opinions. If you'd like though, I will ask '''''(Talk|Contribs) " | 0.00084 | 0 | 0 |
MATE, you are pathetic, just pathetic | 0.977466 | 1 | 1 |
There is new content on Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts. 91.55.97.142 | 0.000743 | 0 | 0 |
"
Calsoyasuchus
On 28 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with from the article Calsoyasuchus, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. " | 0.00059 | 0 | 0 |
P.S- How the hell are you going to block me when you aren't an admin?! | 0.840586 | 1 | 1 |
#wallofthewasatch bitch! | 0.996224 | 1 | 1 |
Marcus. You suck guys dicks. | 0.997443 | 1 | 1 |
RT @nikkiconner13: Panera with my bottom bitch @iSpeakMut | 0.981833 | 1 | 1 |
RT @Livlopezzz: Let me make this clear I don't need no fucking body! I don't need none of you whack ass hoes too be friend 😴 | 0.997078 | 1 | 1 |
Stability
There seem to be plenty of edits to this article in recent days, and there's one section marked as being subject to large changes as an event approaches, and according to the Good Article criteria, an article has to be stable. Is this article being edited alot now? | 0.000565 | 0 | 0 |
My boyfriend is such a smart ass bitch watch yourself you wear the pants but I fucking unzip them. K. | 0.997892 | 1 | 1 |
What @user did was the YT equivalent of a woman making false rape claims. He fucked over any real doxxing victims in the future. | 0.96087 | 1 | 0 |
"
Dear Sitush, I understand your point. If you see this WP Only a few are cited from inscriptions, most of them are well supported by Book citations ( I mean I have given book citations as secondary, I have provided more than 2-3 citations as backup). Please remember that those inscriptions are genuine and they are not manipulated or tricky.
Once can easily corelate the inscription to the actual Rajus WP content.
For E.g The inscription A.R No. 283 of 1924 (krishna dist)says ""States that a certain Brahmin Chavali Bhaskara consecrated the image of Chagi-Ganapesvara and that king Chagi Manma endowed the temple with land. Describes the Chagi family as of Kshatriya caste (bahujakula) and gives the donor’s genealogy."" > from this inscription We derive Chagi family as belonging to Kshatriya caste - There is only Chagi royal family in entire telugu society, i.e Chagis of Kshatriya Raju's who ruled Krishna dist, later they ruled Peddapuram kingdom also. There are several inscriptions/books/evidences about Rajus/Rajulu as they have been in ruling since 5th century right from Eastern Chalukyas, after medieval period certainly ther kingdoms started diminishing except one or two.
one can see my contribution to this Rajus WP since three years, I have removed content which was puffery and added content which I was sure about and genuine with backing evidence. I can surely say this Rajus WP just reflects 40-50% of their glorious history. Whatever content I written/write I am sure Majoritarian Andhra historians will agree with me. I agree with you on the point that most of Indian caste make puffery out of nothing, For this I would suggest to Wiki Founders to induldge the Genuine Historians of respective region like Andhra Historical Research Society to be involved and review the caste/community specific WP. I would be one of the happiest persons if it was so. Also please go through this talk page, as most of the answers and relations are explained by Mr. APHistory and myself.
" | 0.00067 | 0 | 0 |
You could have unlocked it - as you see below the reason for the locking was total garbage and way OTT. But you chose not to. | 0.035387 | 0 | 0 |
Ungrateful shit lol RT @DJSydneyLove: Is sending for me in a Uber the new way of tryna pay for pussy ? Cuz lol, pls don't. | 0.983352 | 1 | 1 |
An open letter from the Wikipedia Review
This is a message to Jenny,
What the fuck do you think this is, some place where you can just waltz in unannounced and be received with arms wide open? WELL FUCK THAT! This is motherfucking Wikipedia, bitch. WE call the shots. WE ALWAYS get shotgun. WE don't give a fuck who you are, because WE are infinitely more important than you. WE are always first in line. WE always fuck the hot chick before she gets acne and settles for you. WE rob banks, charities, and ANYONE else who fucking pisses us off. This place is more than just a place, faggot, it is an IDEOLOGY. And this ideology says you need to GET THE FUCK OUT.
No one here will ever like you. WE have already established cliques, slop-worthy-hoes, and prop-worthy-bros, GOT IT? WE are the ideology of elitism, exploitation, and lulz. This isn't a fucking game, kid, so don't try to tag along. You're talking to people who have been around the block AND THEN SOME. WE pioneered class. WE made 'cool' cool. And you? What have you done? Jerked off in the shower? WE INVENTED JERKING OFF IN THE SHOWER, you stupid bitch. There is a clear-cut, defined, infinitely thick WALL between you and us. WE built the wall that keeps you fags OUT. So don't try to act like you know what the fuck is going on, because you don't. You just do NOT.
But you really think you can compete with the Review? LOL WOW Don't make me start flaming you. Are you forgetting who we are? WE are the ones who film people like you getting fucking destroyed by us. WE will rip your ASSHOLE out of your fucking rectum, STITCH IT on top of your pitiful dick hole, and then fuck you in the VAGINA we just made for you. SO WE MAKE YOU INTO A BITCH. Do you get it now? This site isn't a game, it isn't a place to 'chill' with your fags, and it isn't some fucking haven where people like you can get acceptance from people like US. IT ISN'T GOING TO HAPPEN. JUST GTFO | 0.998315 | 1 | 1 |
That guideline has been largely dismissed. The year in front naming convention is only useful for repeated events. | 0.000579 | 0 | 0 |
RT @JRsBBQ: TV wrestling villains must lie, selectively be a coward, be a bully when they can, gain unfair advantages bitch & moan, & disre… | 0.783212 | 1 | 1 |
I also find your admittance that you don't know how God could have made us admirable. Since you don't understand creationism, you should stop arguing until you understand more. | 0.000813 | 0 | 0 |
you're so idi.o.t, so st.u.p.id guy, fu.c.k.i.n.g portuguese, i ha.te the portugueses | 0.986544 | 1 | 1 |
I responded on the article talk page here. I see what you're saying, but I disagree. I think it looks better the way it is now, especially with the long block quote in the first section. I mean, the other option to me is bullets, but I think we both would agree that's not that aesthetically pleasing. Without some kind of division, it makes it harder to see that the three options are mutually exclusive, or arose independently at best. Without the divisions, in my opinion, it sounds like one origin narrative that all together led to the high five, rather than three separate possibilities. | 0.000547 | 0 | 0 |
Song
N-E-T-T-O Netto is the place to go, shop all day shop all night come home with a bag of shite! | 0.913329 | 1 | 1 |
RT @YaBoyMJ23: rt for mj
fav for a bitch nigga http://t.co/y4yIc38qWS | 0.985748 | 1 | 1 |
Singaporean records in swimming
You edit a short course record under a long course record table. | 0.000611 | 0 | 0 |
Please forgive and correct the mistake if I am wrong but do you have a personal connection with Wikiseek?
The reason I ask is the laser-like focus of your edits:
* 19:19, 16 March 2007 (hist) (diff) m Wikiseek (top)
* 19:18, 16 March 2007 (hist) (diff) Wikiseek (Reworded the biased warning about missing articles.)
* 18:44, 16 March 2007 (hist) (diff) m Search engine (Added Wikiseek back to the list) (top)
* 18:49, 10 February 2007 (hist) (diff) m Wikiseek (added categories)
* 18:45, 10 February 2007 (hist) (diff) Search engine (Added Wikiseek to the chart)
* 00:21, 7 June 2006 (hist) (diff) User:Billvision (Bill Sutherland's bio) (top)
You recently reverted my (factual edits) pointing out the shortcomings of Wikiseek. Are you able to persuade us of your neutral point of view?
I intend to reinstate my factual comments as to examples of failing searches. Please would you be so kind as to discuss any proposed excision of my examples in the Discussion page for the Wikisearch article BEFORE you revert again? | 0.000812 | 0 | 0 |
"
DRMIES DELETED FRANKIE STEIN FROM MONSTER HIGH!!!! DRMIES IS THE ""F"" WORD!!!" | 0.896741 | 1 | 1 |
ONCE AGAIN JD UK IS A FUCKING FAGGOT FUCKER WHO DESERVES TO BE BEATEN WIT DA UGLY STICK | 0.998141 | 1 | 1 |
Enough for GA? yes! Complete? I think one can find more info moving forward | 0.003232 | 0 | 0 |
AfD nomination of Jack Hobson-Dupont
An article that you have been involved in editing, Jack Hobson-Dupont, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Hobson-Dupont. Thank you. | 0.000586 | 0 | 0 |
RT @TurtleMcNasty: Well I'd love to stay and chat but you're a total bitch | 0.979831 | 1 | 1 |
bitch I got the beef links | 0.992212 | 1 | 1 |
RT @GorgeousCamry_: 😂😂 hoes be in everybody clothes and got the nerve to take a picture man that shit crazy ! | 0.956501 | 1 | 1 |
I hope you die!==
Find a pit and jump into it. <3
== | 0.873963 | 1 | 1 |
"
Your submission at AfC Gelato Italia was accepted
Gelato Italia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. .
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
" | 0.000503 | 0 | 0 |
Jimbo Wales
Stupid. | 0.949031 | 1 | 1 |
Got the Vector Job, bitch. | 0.985871 | 1 | 1 |
RT @YaboySkeete: Lmaoooooo RT @ItsMeGrizz: Nymphos are stupid. Go hose your pussy down you weird bitch | 0.998137 | 1 | 1 |
I wish bitches would be straight up wit their friends and tell em they look ugly when they really do and not say they cute 😒 smh | 0.908571 | 1 | 1 |
Did Gabrielle fuck a chick? Did Gabrielle express an interest in the fiction in fucking a chick? No? SHE ISN'T A LESBIAN. Categorizing based on lies is wrong. But as time has proven over and over again, as long as at least two people prefer the lie to the truth, it stays on Wikipedia. | 0.99042 | 1 | 1 |
"
Ones again, that what you just said is to the question above. He was relevant during his life time to the Serbia and Montenegro. As it is cited in the article ""He ruled over an area in eastern Montenegro"", language tag will be reverted. Also, references. speaks " | 0.000539 | 0 | 0 |
@GDuenez ur one to talk bitch | 0.990383 | 1 | 1 |
Pathetic Article
Doesn't mention the historiography whatsoever, whomever wrote this was clearly an imbecile and beneath contempt. 86.40.196.208 | 0.434563 | 1 | 1 |
Bible Society
I`m fed up with Catholics as you,using Wikipedia as proselytist media.
I will write articles exposing cruel persecutiuon by catholics against bible societies. | 0.764274 | 1 | 1 |
Metropolitan Area is rather a misnomer for this university-religious nut of a town. The university owns most of the public land, dictates city policy, and it is largely residential other than the two main arteries dissecting it: College St. from N. to S. and Opelika Rd from E. to W. Look at any US or Alabama State map and the area does not even register for a small inlet map detail. Also, a Metro area should have a decent public transportation system; Tiger Transit is laughable. Rather pretentious to refer to it as a Metro to anyone outside the insane college football zealots populating the area. | 0.005559 | 0 | 0 |
"
No Problem
Sure, no problem. I'll just drop the matter after Verdy P responds condescendingly and name-calls; absolutely no conduct issue there. There's also no issue in his insistence that he's right and everybody around him is wrong, even in the face of proof. And it's perfectly ok for fellow ""volunteers"" to not read issues properly and back each other up no matter their faults and pretend like there's no problems in their actions. Enjoy having wikipedia edited by Verdy and his ignorant bunch, who prioritize preaching account creation to IP users such as myself instead of worrying about article content validity, for which they're part of the problem.70.51.38.110 " | 0.005297 | 0 | 0 |
RT @grindingdude: #13Hours of hell. Obama flat out lied to get reelected. #killery <What diff does it make now?
Karma, it's a bitch! http… | 0.951057 | 1 | 1 |
Ok Sudo Ghost, I would like you to come up with a summary of what those links say. Until then I will be reverting back to the edit as I consider that the summary is an accurate one without copy+pasting the entire aricles. Thanks! | 0.000727 | 0 | 0 |
Bro, why do u always suspect me? r u frustrated? | 0.547287 | 1 | 1 |
Exactly. Justinthebull, straw man arguments will NOT help you. | 0.000856 | 0 | 0 |
"
____
Well all right, at least we are getting some debate on the subject.
Paul Siebert - The main contribution of the FCM 36 was the sloped armor on all sides, with the slope of the hull continuous with the turret, so that the tank ended up with a pyramidal shape and a very small turret. This was exactly the same shape of the T-34 which appeared some 3-4 years later than the FCM 36 and yet the T-34 gets all the credit and accolades as a ""revolutionary design"" for its sloped armor. Well, the French came up with that idea first (p. 247-248 in T-34 Mythical Weapon). Michulec goes further and points out that the pyramidal shape was highly impractical as it resulted in a tiny turret that was all but nonfunctional as the two crewmen could barely aim, load, and fire the gun. This was why the initial ""flat turret"" with the steeply sloped sides was replaced by the slightly larger, and less steeply sloped ""hexagonal turret"" (p. 245). The later T-34-85 turret was hardly sloped at all in order to maximize space to fit the larger gun.
As for your point about the dysfunctionality of the T-34-76, the early T-34-76 models were the most dysfunctional because of their tiny, steeply sloped turrets and the weak L-11 gun. The larger hexagonal turret, which was designed to allow for installation of the more powerful F-34 gun was much more functional, but it was still a two man turret lacking a commander. That problem was not fixed until early 1944 when the T-34-85 finally rolled off the production lines with a three man turret. The T-34-76 models thus ALL shared this problem of having nearly blind crewmen trying to fight on the battlefield. The Germans found it very easy to pick them off like ducks because the tank crews had a very limited field of vision, and no way to communicate with other tanks. There is a description in Healy's Zitadelle of an episode at the Battle of Kursk where the Soviet T-34s were charging in and the Germans would just leisurely pick off the T-34s one by one, with all the surviving T-34s completely oblivious to the mass destruction around them. That was in July 1943. Michulec's book does show that the Soviets started installing a commanders cupola on the hexagonal turret in the summer of 1943 (p. 123). Probably learned something from the heavy losses of the Battle of Kursk that the tank crews needed to be able to see what was going on around them.
Michulec points out that the tank that the Germans most likely did fear and have a lot of trouble with was the KV-1. The KV-1 had the really tough armor that was resistant to the early German guns (the T-34's thin side armor could be penetrated by the weak guns of the German tanks of 1941) and it had the three man crew that made it a formidable fighting machine on the battlefield. The T-34-76 crews could simply not see well enough and function inside that tiny turret well enough to be a serious threat to German tanks. The problem with the KV-1 of course was twofold - it was very slow and sluggish and did not travel through bad terrain very well, unlike the T-34. And it carried the name of the later discredited Kliment Voroshilov. Which is probably why in the Soviet retelling of history, the KV-1 gets only a very brief mention. All the glory gets heaped on the T-34s, which the Germans had no reason to fear because it was not much of a threat to them on the battlefield, due to its dysfunctional tiny two man turret. Michulec points out that the German generals, especially Guderian, in all probability confused the KV-1 and T-34 in their memoirs.
____
DMorpheus - I think you are being a bit harsh with Michulec's book. But at least you recognize the huge amount of work that he put into this thing. Yes, the photos and drawings are INCREDIBLE. I think rather than calling the text ""awful"", it would be more accurate to describe its two major problems:
1. The book was translated by somebody for whom English was a second language. Not quite as bad as the translation for the movie ""Alexander Nevsky"", but a bit difficult to understand sometimes.
2. Michulec goes overboard with his obvious anti-Soviet ranting. Somebody should have just edited all this out, and it would have made the book more professional.
But, if you are able to slug through the difficult translation and filter out the anti-Soviet bias, what you find is that Michulec has packed his book chock full of facts, and he does reference most of his major facts. Unfortunately those references all seem to be in Russian or Polish or German. But I think that is where this book shines over books by Zaloga.
Here's an excerpt (p. 161):
{{quote|The relocation of the production, the starting of new assembly lines, usually in great haste, and the loss of many sources of raw ma | 0.000798 | 0 | 0 |
Comment- , I would assume that the 2013–14 UEFA Champions League is one competition with various stages, where as the 2013–14 A-League is a separate competition to the Final Series of that season (the league acting as qualification for the end-of-season play-off tournament). So, it could be said the 2013–14 A-League season is comprised of two separate competitions.
I'm still not convinced that the addition of season to the article name will add clarification. Is clarification really necessary? If so, why? | 0.000582 | 0 | 0 |
No complaints on my end; I've not had any edit conflicts, so I'd just somewhat been assuming that you would have, simply for the reason of probability: I assumed that because we've been working on the same list at the same time, we would have been conficting some way or another. I'm happy to keep doing what we've been doing, sort of a division of effort as you mention. | 0.000568 | 0 | 0 |
Muslim lover
You are scared of Islam. | 0.70739 | 1 | 1 |
Comment: There already is a redirect from frankish to an article at franks. Maybe move this to frankish (language? Or even to frankish? Anyway, I've put in some wikilinks. No vote as yet. 09:25, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC) | 0.000558 | 0 | 0 |
"
""Oxford"", wow, should I be impressed? No one is unmistakable, not even Universitas Oxoniensis. And the fact is that HOS never participated in the Croat-Bosniak War.161.53.27.4 " | 0.000748 | 0 | 0 |
"
I dont want an edit war. Anytime I try to do anything I reported for evading, my comments are ""redacted"" and I get reported. Y is no 1 policing HC? 70.108.133.81 " | 0.007879 | 0 | 0 |
"
Leopard again
Hey Cas,
a while back, we talked about collaboration for thsi one. I have a lot of free time on my hands around now, so if you're interested, I think a collaboration on this article would possibly produce an FA. If you're not interested, or busy, that's fine too; just thought I'd let you know that I was resuming activity on the article since you expressed interest last time. Cheers, and best, Talk " | 0.000531 | 0 | 0 |
I can't trust a bitch 💯 | 0.894635 | 1 | 1 |
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL | 0.097895 | 0 | 0 |
RT @BadNewsAli: You really are a faggot if you say that match was bad. Stop watching | 0.965915 | 1 | 1 |
"
Yes, got that now, it's available on amazon.com Look Inside. Sorry about that. That's a source to treat with a certain amount of circumspection, based on a cursory examination: she maintains that the Sorraia is a separate species, Equus stenonius (p.72), and that crossing a 3/4 Andalusian with an Andalusian will give a 5/8 Andalusian (p.82).
On ""meters first"", your memory is perhaps deceiving you; the list on the Andalusian talk page referred not to primary units, but to the quite unnecessary conversion of hands to inches, on which topic you will note that I have here respected, while still disagreeing with, your wishes. No-one has suggested that WP:UNIT can be ignored; and yet you persist in ignoring it. Why is that? " | 0.000751 | 0 | 0 |
I'm boutta merk a nigguh | 0.65299 | 1 | 1 |
RT @Things4WhitePpl: Being pussy-whipped http://t.co/55BxG7PBNG | 0.895348 | 1 | 1 |
Jaime dont make me look like a bitch lmao | 0.974132 | 1 | 1 |
"
Offensive words!!!!!
The second paragraph starts off as, ""Situated on the river Main,**** ****"". I am not even going to write the offensive words that are there. This is my first time signing on to Wikipedia and I am not sure what I need to do to have this taken off the page." | 0.002176 | 0 | 0 |
@AwiLL_2RECKLESS lmao omm you see the bitch tryna act like she ain't feel it ahaha | 0.958495 | 1 | 1 |
"
Actually, another question. was listed as being suspected, but that account didn't come up in your list. Are they unrelated? — (say whaaat?!) " | 0.001897 | 0 | 0 |
Why do you ask me, there is a conclusion in the source, in it is not nothing | 0.00072 | 0 | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:The Kindly Ones (Littell novel) | 0.000657 | 0 | 0 |
Im sorry but you didn't have to be a bitch last night. | 0.9515 | 1 | 1 |
Yes, my point exactly. The single digit would be misunderstood which was listed. The two digit which we agree would also be misunderstood was missing (not mentioned) and we wouldn't want that used. So for clarity I boldly added it. I have no problem with discussing it at the talk page if you desire.— | 0.000537 | 0 | 0 |
@StephyRae7 No I'm pimping out you and those guys at the park playing bitch volleyball. #HairyChestsDoee | 0.965036 | 1 | 1 |
"
s deletion policy]]). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Yes, ""Prada Transformer"", with quotes, should be deleted. I created the article with quotes in the title by mistake, and moved the page to Prada Transformer without quotes. But no redirect from the quoted version is needed. However, I believe Prada Transformer, without quotes, does meet notability guidelines. I've added a bunch more external links to big-name sources like Vogue, Vanity Fair, and New York Magazine, so that it's clear that the Prada Transformer has received reasonably wide media coverage, especially within the fashir talk:Peace and Passion|""I'm listening....""]])
Rollback
I've added the rollback privilege to your account, because it looks like you could use it. Check out Wikipedia:Rollback feature and the linked policy (and practice) pages if you need any guidance on how the tool should be used. If it was too presumptuous of me to flip the bit for you, say the word and I'll turn it off again.
Cheers! (talk)
Thanks!
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Yes, ""Prada Transformer"", with quotes, should be deleted. I created the article with quotes in the title by mistake, and moved the page to Prada Transformer without quotes. But no redirect from the quoted version is needed. However, I believe Prada Transformer, without quotes, does meet notability guidelines. I've added a bunch more external links to big-name sources like Vogue, Vanity Fair, and New York Magazine, so that it's clear that the Prada Transformer has received reasonably wide media coverage, especially within the fashir talk:Peace and Passion|""I'm listening....""]])
Rollback
I've added the rollback privilege to your account, because it looks like you could use it. Check out Wikipedia:Rollback feature and the linked policy (and practice) pages if you need any guidance on how the tool should be used. If it was too presumptuous of me to flip the bit for you, say the word and I'll turn it off again.
Cheers! (talk)
Thanks!
ity guidelines. I've added a bunch more external links to big-name sources like Vogue, Vanity Fair, and New York Magazine, so that it's clear that the Prada Transformer has received reasonably wide media coverage, especially within the fashir talk:Peace and Passion|""I'm listening....""]])
Rollback
I've added the rollback privilege to your account, because it looks like you could use it. Check out Wikipedia:Rollback feature and the linked policy (and practice) pages if you need any guidance on how the tool should be used. If it was too presumptuous of me to flip the bit for you, say the word and I'll turn it off again.
Cheers! (talk)
Thanks!
Rollback
I've added the rollback privilege to your account, because it looks like you could use it. Check out [[Wi | 0.000878 | 0 | 0 |
WIKIPEDIA SUX RANK FAGOTY ASS == | 0.92428 | 1 | 1 |
Kungfu Adam
Kungfu Adam is a fucking dumbass. | 0.9975 | 1 | 1 |
@RickiRoma bitch watch ya tone before I drag you to the recycling bin you bitch ass nigga. You gon end up like limewire ol .exe ass nigga | 0.998523 | 1 | 1 |
Blocking
User:Peter Isotalo keeps placing a vowel chart in Bulgarian language, which has nothing to do with the Bulgarian language. The Bulgarian language has six vowel phonemes (+ 4 allophones, in all 10), the chart has 8 vowels - which are all supposed to be phonemes. I have included one of the sources which I have used during writing the article (the English one), later today it will be followed by the Bulgarian one, which is the latest edition on the Bulgarian language by the Bulgarian Academy of Science. Both sources confirm what I say whereas the vowel chart (which is completely wrong) has an unknown origin as it has not been made by the user who keeps putting it in. I have reverted again the article because the vowel chart is wrong, on top of it, it has an unknown origin. You can re-block me again but sooner or later I'll get de-blocked and there are also other administrators to contact, and I'll pursue my case until the vowel chart gets expunged from the article or gets corrected accordingly. Have a good day. | 0.000981 | 0 | 0 |
"
okay ""fag"" Obviously you need to leave the house more and lurk wikipedia less. When you begin to sign my comments for me you know you're gay for me. Like anybody actually fucking cares who posted it except you." | 0.992141 | 1 | 1 |
IOW, as long as LIBERAL COMPLETELY CONTROL Wikipedia, as they do now... this glimpse of REALITY will never see the light of day! haha | 0.012771 | 0 | 0 |
Indeed, Google Ngrams jives with my own anecdotal experiences along west Greenland as well, even the Danes on the ship I was on used the term, and Sondrestrom seemed to be limited to specific reference to the military base. I'm a civilian, military usage might be different. talk | 0.000583 | 0 | 0 |
Saving Sir Richard=
If you would please, have a look [this]. Thanks M'friend!(The IP formally known as Ghost) | 0.000639 | 0 | 0 |
RT @MNicolee_: Got this bitch at work mad with me bc her ex BITCH on my dick 😂😂😂 | 0.997683 | 1 | 1 |
FYI hahahahaha - you posted a link to an article on cave diving. Can't you do ANYTHING right, you buffoon? | 0.904574 | 1 | 1 |
"
a play on ""Full of shit"". Unblock it if you like. " | 0.943116 | 1 | 1 |
Congratulations!
Congratulations, Bmusician, you have won the asshole of the year award! You have won this award by saying mean things about and to other people! In order to claim your award, you must call 1-800-Asshole(1-800-277-4653)! Once again, congratulations for your win! 142.162.26.48 | 0.810886 | 1 | 1 |
She be thinking she throwing that pussy back so good and all she doing is throwing ya nut process off | 0.991654 | 1 | 1 |
But Jimbo doesn't want freedom of expression here. He said so years ago. As for the issues you support you are baiting right wingers.I myself do agree with your views with the exception of laptops. We all know black kids would beat each over the head with them. 69.243.42.251 | 0.04702 | 0 | 0 |
You're cool
You seem like a really cool guy... *bursts out laughing at sarcasm*. | 0.569308 | 1 | 1 |
NG2
Hi. Sorry about the Speedy Deletion thing. As you can see from my Talk page, I came home full of vodka-Red Bulls last night and went a bit haywire. Won't happen again. | 0.029212 | 0 | 0 |
"
A slightly nasty side comment: it is a common idea, outside mathematical and computer science cultures, that exact math is superfluous, and a hindrance to true understanding. Having math and CompSci, I reject this for the reason: understanding requires full logic down to a mechanical level – irrespective of the background of the pupil. Exact math is the sole way to succeed (but it's not a complete prerequisit, of course). Said: Rursus " | 0.001127 | 0 | 0 |
Lol Sam said "Betty Boop" is a hoe 😂 | 0.182493 | 1 | 1 |
Could you pleasee....
Roll over and die. 157.157.149.86 | 0.867282 | 1 | 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.