text
stringlengths 7
5k
| degree_of_toxicity
float64 0
1
| contains_offensive_word
int64 0
1
| label
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|
HA HA im on episode 7 so fuck u, now let me spoil it. Basicly jack + dad kill the 2 guys, drive to his brothers house, interrogate him, brother tells him that he ist he one behind all of the last season and then his dad kills jacks bro.
The End | 0.992458 | 1 | 1 |
"By the way we do punch bitches." | 0.983214 | 1 | 1 |
You also???
Wow! Gwen Gale has got two pimps... | 0.002239 | 0 | 0 |
"usually for spoof articles?
World a better place, 6 April 2010
Alex has made the world a better place to live with all his life acheivements
173.3.138.41
You need to provide a 'please change X to Y' level of deatil when using the editsemiprotected template. Thanks,
Criticism Section - Not Clutch
This section is basically about how Arod is not considered to be clutch. The section is outdated and irrelevant due to his performance in the 2009 playoffs. No one debates whether or not he is clutch anymore. This entire section should be deleted. Does anyone disagree? — (talk • contribs)
I'm thinking about this. Some of it could be kept, if put in a historical perspective. But it is clearly over the top as it is.
I just reread this section, and it's completely outdated. I still think it should be removed in it's entirety.
Some of it needs to be kept. Let's discuss what should stay and what should go. I'm totally okay with reducing the size of it, but it needs to be mentioned.
I made some dramatic changes to the section, trying to shorten it and update it. Also, I've tried to reorganize the section as it had obviously grown organically over a long period. My efforts are by no means stellar, and I suggest people look at the section with new eyes to see how to further improve it.
It is, at the least, a good start. Thank you. I'll take a closer look at it later.
Nice updates. The section seems relevant again.
I made some minor copyedits to the section. I think the section ought to stay included it's part of Arod's historical record that he's come under fire for being ""un-clutch"" (ludicrous as those criticisms may have been). I'm also going to remove the tag suggesting integrating the section elsewhere the section hardly gives undue weight to the controversy, which extended over a period of several years and occupied who-knows-how-many back pages in the sports press. bomb
Range Factor
The range factor claims currently tagged as as ""citation needed"" can be verified on ESPN's page (and probably elsewhere). The claims as stated are accurate and verifiable. I'd add the cite, but on second thought I question whether it's really a useful thing to state. It makes it sound like that's the final word on his defense, which it surely isn't. Range factor isn't the only defensive stat, and A-Rod does not rank last on many of the others. To cite it exclusively feels like you're trying to push a point of view criticizing him defensively. (Also, even on range factor, in 2004 and 2005 he was tied for last, not alone.)
""Youngest to hit 600""
This stat is misleading, while he may be the youngest to achieve this he took an above average time to do so. He played 183 more games than Babe Ruth. Because Rodriguez started playing baseball at a much earlier age than many of the greats should be noted. He is a good player, but statements concerning his age should be taken out. Games played/Seasons are a better barometer of talent than age. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.123.4.230
= | 0.000627 | 0 | 0 |
Guyanese dollar should have the answer, but doesn't seem to mention a preferred abbreviation (nor any of the related West Indies currency articles I looked at). | 0.000586 | 0 | 0 |
Please stop adding an endless series of pointless tags to pages I have edited. Your conduct is now effectively stalking. As soon as the tags are dealt with, you just add other ones. Thanks. | 0.001605 | 0 | 0 |
RT @OMGitsBabyJoe: I fucked your bitch a hunned times , what the fuck your bitch got on her mind? My fuckin dick.. | 0.998071 | 1 | 1 |
Fake edits
These two articles have been taken over by a collection of p*erverts and yahudi. | 0.678443 | 1 | 1 |
Fuck you, old geezer
Fuck you, you old senile geezer | 0.998202 | 1 | 1 |
Tell me why Irondome put the Western wall (not in Israel) in Israel. Give me the real reason. | 0.001129 | 0 | 0 |
I think the error is that it is grams not kilograms. So 1.5 kg. I'm editing the article til we have a better result. If I'm wrong please change it back. 23:10, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC) | 0.000596 | 0 | 0 |
Cuffin these hoes man that's where you went bad at. You prolly gettin laughed at Cuz everybody smashed that 😴 | 0.542324 | 1 | 1 |
Milk Marie don't approve to you ugly hoes | 0.880408 | 1 | 1 |
Fuck off, nigger
You'd look real good hanging from a tree | 0.99859 | 1 | 1 |
RT @xochinadoll: You hoes are lost. | 0.828653 | 1 | 1 |
History of Chocolate, Chocolataire or Coffee culture are an extension of the topics of their main article. Ever articles on Wiki start with small amounts of content at first.Caspian blue | 0.000661 | 0 | 0 |
how do you like being a racist pig that votes republican? Have fun when your daughters grow up and they are retarded because funding for education is cut, they are fed a completely fast food diet, and when they are forced to worship the bible and
not learn
please stop reversing my edits on elizabeth murdoch. SHe is an evil b.i.t.i.ch that needs to seriously die because she is a threat to humanity.
Please stop attacking me because i am a liberal and want the whole world to prosper, not just rich white people. | 0.979151 | 1 | 1 |
puerto ricans are not white.. we are mixed people who think were white.. i dont but most of family does even thou their clearly mixed with black and indian | 0.053967 | 0 | 0 |
@kieffer_jason am going to hurt more then your bitch ass feelings | 0.996819 | 1 | 1 |
"WP:Parity does not mention anywhere that a pseudoscience ""journal"" can be used to critize something published in a journal like Nature. What these pseudoscience journals can be used for is to show their views in general. ""Journals that are not peer reviewed by the wider academic community should not be considered reliable, except to show the views of the groups represented by those journals.""
" | 0.00071 | 0 | 0 |
RT @iamSwagnificant: A real hoe will never let you turn her into a house wife.. She'll let you know what it is before you start catching fe… | 0.183025 | 1 | 1 |
I'm trying to sort out the plot on her article now. -Trampikey(contribs) | 0.000744 | 0 | 0 |
Bad bitch with me and you kno that her ass is fat | 0.998074 | 1 | 1 |
"
Quick question
Hi how are you? I have a quick English question for you. When ""like"" is used in a song title should it be capitalized? As in Man! I Feel like a Woman!. I thought I would ask you because I think you're one of the most knowledgable editors on here. Thanks ." | 0.00416 | 0 | 0 |
See article talk page, thanks | 0.000597 | 0 | 0 |
All these ratchet hoes be on tha same stuff ! | 0.554482 | 1 | 1 |
"
Thake v Maurice
Just because it had a picture of a penis! " | 0.936509 | 1 | 1 |
Ritesh Deshmukh
Not sure what the problem you are asking about is. However it looks like one editor who created a problem fixed it on their own. If you look here you will see that there are only two inbound redirects. | 0.000692 | 0 | 0 |
@Bombfantasyyy @Angela_Mastr lmao angela you look like a damn potato bitch, keep talkin | 0.990268 | 1 | 1 |
Can't you read the note? After seven albums and more than 32 million in sales say. | 0.000744 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks for the welcome.
Thanks a lot for your welcome to Wikipedia. I see you're involved in a lot of projects and I hope to do the same. Your answer to my question also really helped me out. Thanks a bunch. - | 0.000518 | 0 | 0 |
"
The anonymity fell under the ""Be wary of sources... that attribute material to anonymous sources"" in BLP:GOSSIP that I raised above. As for ''Xtra! I still disagree that it falls within the definition of a ""high quality reliable source"" for the purposes of BLP. But I have no desire to WP:BATTLE or edit war here. It isn't about winning, it is about doing what is best for the project; I've raised what I consider important issues here about the type of material that is being added, and I'm concncerned that WP:BLPCRIME is not being followed. I leave it to the rest of you to decide what you are going to add. Chan " | 0.000638 | 0 | 0 |
"
Merge with Kashmir
I hadn't seen this page before. The article Kashmir is mostly about the princely state. There is no reason for a separate article. It will simply create more confusion. Also, the Imperial Gazetteer of India content is not even minimally paraphrased. Notice, in the Kashmir article it is in quotes. At best this page can be a dab page, but even that is recipe for confusion: imagine a new reader contemplating: Kashmir, Princely State of Kashmir and Jammu (which, by the way, was also called the Princely State of Jammu and Kashmir; in fact the instrument of accession to India by Hari Singh was signed by him with that title.), and Jammu and Kashmir, not to mention Azad Kashmir and lord knows what else. «Talk» " | 0.000588 | 0 | 0 |
kicking this bitch to the curb bruh. | 0.996988 | 1 | 1 |
] // 10
[http://www.webcitation.org/5oGeSq8ag 11 | 0.001199 | 0 | 0 |
For comparison the Liberator has a squadron listing. | 0.000624 | 0 | 0 |
"
The figures are referring to the total naval budgets of each country. Oh gosh, there is so much statistics in this book, but it's German! The previous one was pre-Dreadnoughts ) Below the Super-D's:
Country191019111912191319141915191619171918TotalBritain2655346-132France-331-7Germany-213-6Russia-314USA2-22-3-9Japan-213Other states-213Total26912101397169
" | 0.001394 | 0 | 0 |
@user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user @user They are not representing all women. Theyre representing hysterical women that want to whine and cry about our president and the booming economy. The majority of us women do not agree with those few. Check out my article | 0.063643 | 0 | 1 |
Yes, rewrite it as I suggested. I have an ArbCom case to prepare, so don't have the time to do this. | 0.000677 | 0 | 0 |
Gaga is that bitch who probably gives A+++ lapdances. | 0.994659 | 1 | 1 |
@user Fucking sucks when the refs are against you. #KillTheZebras | 0.99711 | 1 | 1 |
"
What's with all of the templates?
Why are there so many {{clarify}} templates in this article against things that appear to be self-evident, and even common knowledge? Like what ""conception"" means? The way this article's headed it's going to need a citation for every word, never mind every sentence. " | 0.000716 | 0 | 0 |
"
I am a plastic surgeon and treat up to 8 gynecomastia patients a day from around the world. I have been dealing with helping the public learn about this condition for now more than 30 years.
Dealing with so many gynecomastia patients, it is hard to express their frustration with the public just not understanding the problem. The anger is intense and most cannot express themselves why they feel so stressed out about their problem. I put a video of a particularly eloquent patient describing his living with gynecomastia up to help family and others understand the Emotion Behind Gynecomastia. Unfortunately there is noting like hearing the stress in the human voice to emphasize the emotional component, it would have been nice to show the face, but then I would not have been permitted to share his experience. I added it as a reference as I thought it was the best way to show that such details were available to those trying to deal with this problem.
Public phrases like those listed puffy nips also include ""bitch tits"" but I did not know if that was permitted here. So many just do not recognize gynecomastia but the lay phases added.
Non-surgical compression garments have been a major source of stress relief for those waiting to see if their gynecomastia would resolve on its own, or were dealing with losing weight, or just could not afford surgery. This link is to examples of how effective / not effective garments can be for real life sufferers of gynecomastia. Fat people still look fat but the bouncing is stabilized. Many have told me of the differences the garments have made their lives. The parents of one 14 year old child from Trinidad told me he was a different person just from use of the garment while waiting the year his endocrinologist wanted for his medical condition to stabilize. The actual surgery made a greater difference.
Gynecomastia comes in so many differnt forms that the limited pictures just does not tell the story well at all. The Gynecomastia Gallery link is a much more comprehensive method of demonstrating the problem.
Hope the additions were according to form.
" | 0.007064 | 0 | 0 |
This shit is fucking gay you need to get the right information dumb fucks | 0.998971 | 1 | 1 |
Pls I'm sorry, please unblock me so I can harrass Zhanzhao again ) ) ) | 0.000904 | 0 | 0 |
@BobbyRosee Let the hoes tell it man.. | 0.065732 | 0 | 1 |
Dear Gay Man
do you have AIDS? | 0.842792 | 1 | 1 |
Go take a hike, scum! Why in the name of the Great Pumpkin do I have to provide a credible source?! Why doesn't the scum that edited the page with unfounded rumors have to provide a credible source?! According to them, the Great Pumpkin didn't appear at Hallowmas last year; I SAY HE DID! WHERE DO THEY CITE THEIR GODDAMN SOURCE THAT THE GREAT PUMPKIN DIDN'T APPEAR?
Honestly, you people are absolutely ridiculous. I've been saying for years that wikipedia is an unreliable joke full of false information, and this proves it. Someday, if I'm ever a college professor, I'm going to flunk every single one of my sources that cites a wikipedia artlce in their bibliography. Scum! | 0.969607 | 1 | 1 |
how was this show edited?
it says it was on degrassi main page. | 0.000683 | 0 | 0 |
@alammus small man syndrome usually deep down they're huge pussies so they join the authority to compensate their weak ego | 0.802222 | 1 | 1 |
"
=Stuttering modification therapy
Only one long-term efficacy study of a stuttering modification therapy program has been published in a peer-reviewed journal. This study concluded that the program ""appears to be ineffective in producing durable improvements in stuttering behaviors.""
Removing study since there is more than one study (see Laiho, Auli, and Klippi, Anu from International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. Vol 42(3), May-Jun 2007) and to be consistent with other sections. " | 0.000651 | 0 | 0 |
RT @MtuPombe: Hahahaha RT @bniceloco: When her pussy better than you expected it to be http://t.co/8rFdwxCZ3g" | 0.884173 | 1 | 1 |
Brown rice (see Protein combining). This is just an example of one vegetable source of dietary protien. Although I suspect most would find such a diet monotonous. (t) | 0.000565 | 0 | 0 |
RT @BigPoppaDot: I'll never think a bitch is all mine. | 0.965294 | 1 | 1 |
"
I don't think your citations are proof that the English name of Großglockner is Grossglockner. It looks to me like they had technical difficulty printing the ß, and printed the closest ""feasible"" thing, being ""ss"". Is there a ß in the books you cited, for instance in names? Vienna, Milan, Venice and Cologne are English names, and they're clearly different from the originals. Grossglockner isn't, in my opinion. " | 0.000668 | 0 | 0 |
fascist leader > clerofascist
He was more correctly clerofascist leader . please correct it.65.35.249.125 | 0.031688 | 0 | 0 |
Next Sunday faggot @leiacatherinexx | 0.891574 | 1 | 1 |
, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Support '''''' 15:09 | 0.00063 | 0 | 0 |
“@_Jamal___: these hoes ain't loyal” no they ain't | 0.210338 | 1 | 1 |
Matt Bakers dad sucked my big fat cock last night | 0.997675 | 1 | 1 |
I meant the entire reaction section is stupid, don't know why I added international in there. 175.110.222.144 | 0.398592 | 1 | 1 |
Moved Vik i vestnes to a separate page.
It was placed at the bottom of the Vik -page.
Someone should fix this. | 0.001873 | 0 | 0 |
(2)Your link (edited out de facto to replace it by Israeli border) refers to an edit made by 64.119.142.118, not by NoCal100. | 0.000659 | 0 | 0 |
"
Everyone is welcome! chat " | 0.000615 | 0 | 0 |
"
I agree, its a better picture for the article - my concern is purely on the copyright side of things. I remember this problem when I created the first version of the article - I couldn't find a good picture that wasn't potentially copyright... It's a challenge for photographs that might be around 1900+ in date. Where we don't have a photographer's name, it is quite plausible that they may have been taken (say) by a 20 year old, who could easily have lived to seventy, in which case the ""lifetime + 70 years"" of copyright protection won't run out until 2020+, depending on the exact date of the photo. With a photo with a firmer date (e.g. 1880s) we'd be on somewhat safer ground, but as you say, the website isn't giving an indication there. " | 0.000573 | 0 | 0 |
"
According to which policy MEDRS is not applicable to the history section. MEDRS is applicable to this article. Please explain how the source is reliable in accordance with MEDRS. We have far better sources available and it is a WEIGHT violation to include the newly added text. " | 0.000553 | 0 | 0 |
' Fuck her right in the pussy 󾌴󾌴󾌴󾌴 | 0.995767 | 1 | 1 |
Christopher Reich
This has been unspeedied as he's appeared on the NYT Best Seller list. Use an AFD is you still don't consider him notable enough. | 0.000662 | 0 | 0 |
"
Needs A Criticism Section
Considering that the theory being described here was demonstrably utter bilge (the narrative of imperialist exploitation, for instance, is not so much wrong as in the ""not even wrong"" category), which resulted in the deaths and persecutions of uncountable millions, it's rather staggering that there isn't one of wikipedia's popular ""criticisms"" sections anywhere. It's like describing Nazism without critical discussion of the errors of the programme and its appalling consequences.
Lenin was that most tragic of a historical figures- a nutball who disastrously gained power, with devastating consequences for entire peoples. His cranky theories were the kind of stuff that, were he to be an ordinary person in the modern day, would be linked to from cranks.net. An encyclopedia should have the balance to explain this. This is important stuff; naive young readers will reach this page and may take the theory seriously, without realising that it's the political science equivalent of Time Cube.82.71.30.178 " | 0.001003 | 0 | 0 |
"
Footprint
Mulatto should dominant music, tv and goverment dominant everything we see we should dominant it.never give up power to anyone but other mulattos.We are the dominant power to black people that`s why the need us so much we can dominant it.mulatto the dominantor
mulatto always a will be lighter skinned not dark skinned thoes are black africans no matter what. (unsigned)
Like I have said countless times over, today's ""mulatto 'movement' "" or ""internet mulatto 'movement' "" ,lol! , (for lack of a better phrase) draws all its esteem from the counterproductive denigration of ""black"" people and nothing else. I put black in quotes because in the United States ""mulatto"" and ""black"" aren't necessarily mutually exclusive concepts. I will go as far to say any power self-identifying ""mulattos"" have or hope to have will always be in relation to ""black"" people. But what these ""mulattos"" fail to realize is that their very existence promotes ""race mixing"" or encouraging 6'8"" Mandingo date, marry, and impregnate 5'3"" Mary Sue which whites, no matter how much you cozy up to them and try to delink yourself from blacks, will innately reject and perennially frown upon (I am sure there are black/mulatto men who would take advantage of the ""mulatto movement"" to sleep with as many white women as possible - white women who were not accessible before). Interestingly, people at the helm of the ""mulatto movement"" more than likely turn out to be quadroons or octoroons. It's fascinating because there is a hierarchical paradigm that is followed; and what's funny is that I can imagine hexadecaroon's forming a ""quadroon movement"" that not only denigrated ""black"" people but ""mulatto"" people as well. You gotta love this stuff! lol! -)
" | 0.035026 | 0 | 0 |
Hello, please review the discussion page on talk:shotgun and lets open a discussion on changing the barrel lengths for the sports you mentioned. 19:30, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC) | 0.000608 | 0 | 0 |
Category:Veterans of the Battle of Kursk
:Category:Veterans of the Battle of Kursk, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. | 0.000503 | 0 | 0 |
RT @macklemore: I feel bad for all the homies that suffer from canker sores on the reg. those bitches hinder the spirit | 0.913609 | 1 | 1 |
Please be more carefull Honchos
Could you please be more carefull whilst editing Wikipedia, this edit could be construed as vandalism. Could you also be more careful with the revert button. Edouard-Henri Aril (Talk) - | 0.000638 | 0 | 0 |
Wikipedia Ettiquette
All the free porn you will ever need, you fucking dickwad, is available at www.youporn.com | 0.996916 | 1 | 1 |
"
I have never been ""blocked for disruptive editing."" If you're going to post on my user page, you will assume good faith and remain civil. Thank you. - " | 0.000538 | 0 | 0 |
I fuckin hate this bitches voice OMG | 0.998262 | 1 | 1 |
I can tell you that in Baghdadthe shit that goes down would make any thing that goes on in Englewood look like a Nickelodeon show! And make the hardest guy in Englewood cry for his mother and look like a stright BITCH! | 0.891034 | 1 | 1 |
@bonnoxxx yea cuh a bitch fuc donald sterling .. Cuhz pimpin tho | 0.995921 | 1 | 1 |
They still havent edited sixtenn 8+2+5+2 = 17 my maths isnt that bad is it? talk | 0.001435 | 0 | 0 |
STOP FUCKING ADDING VIKING METAL. THEY SOUND NOTHING LIKE ENSIFERUM OR TYR. FUCKING IDIOTS. | 0.998512 | 1 | 1 |
Ojibwe is different than Delaware, range block this you morons | 0.893815 | 1 | 1 |
Medals
Holy crap look at that picture! How many freakin' medals does this guy have?!? I can understand a medal for being first in space, but he looks decorated enough to command the army around with the flick of his wrist. | 0.890323 | 1 | 1 |
"
College123456789
can you tell me specifically what i have to do to modify my page that you deleted. I look forward to making the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs)
Before you think about submitting any article, you need to think about basic things like: create a section heading for a new message, put it in the right place, sign with ~~~~, etc. I suggest you work through a few of the articles listed in the sub-categories of Category:Schools in Connecticut and tell me six differences between those articles and your submission. — (talk · contribs) " | 0.00055 | 0 | 0 |
@HomoHulk told you them bitches was mad even, g. | 0.992048 | 1 | 1 |
Mum told me about that guy from one direction puffin on the dutchy nd I was like so? Least the cunt isny a mad smackhead... | 0.661841 | 1 | 1 |
Hey
What I know is that: the medal tables are filled anyway, because in the same article I'm seeing tables with different medal and time orders. So do not talk to me about rules. You, when you fill the meda tables, not follow and don't observe the actually order of the frames. I'm arranging them in a logical way: order of importance of the medals (gold-silver-bronze) + date order (first to last medal). What are you complaining about? I'm just fixing a giant mess. | 0.001413 | 0 | 0 |
If a bitch don't like me, sumthin wrong wit da bitch | 0.996757 | 1 | 1 |
@_InhaleLove_ bitches love some Alex from target 😏 | 0.645253 | 1 | 1 |
Look, as I've already explained, THERE IS NO LIST. There's only a list of ALL Talk pages generated from the Deletion log. A small sample, once again:
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 NawlinWiki (g1)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 TheParanoidOne (CSD A7: Non-notable person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content.)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 W.marsh (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dalaina)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:42 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:41 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:41 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:41 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:41 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:41 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
18:41 11/27 Betacommand (speedy deletion under I7)
The way the orphaned talk pages are found is through the human eyeball unless you want to write some sort of script that finds them. Go to it, it'll save a lot of trouble, but until then, this is how I'm doing it.
As for my errors, that's five or so out of what? 1-2,000 that I've tagged. Considering that the error rate for the deleting admins who should have been deleting the pages to begin with instead of relying upon people like me to sweep up after them is closer to 1% to 5%, depending, perhaps your advice has higher priority targets. | Talk | 0.001825 | 0 | 0 |
Name
Why is there a citation needed for the gun being dropped from the name? Wouldn't it be intuitive from the link and the current name? | 0.000611 | 0 | 0 |
RT @CakebossLex: “@LaughAtProblems: I need me a bitch that can dance https://t.co/jDXiD5I9DK” lmfao this is ode | 0.8678 | 1 | 1 |
Damn wiki admins
What is it with all these wiki admins and THEM not being able to follow RULES and policies such as the NPOV, 3RR and rules pertaining for VANDALISM.
if anyone knows how i can get in touch directly with SENIOR Admins i would greatly appreciate it as some admins just make their owns rules up on the spot while disobeying wikipedias rules and effectivly slamming banhammers
and no, im not talking about all admins, but i am talking about quite a few admins! | 0.767333 | 1 | 1 |
. He has had a wiki article with this title since August 2007 | 0.000682 | 0 | 0 |
A bitch will be quick to get mad if they have to write and essay, but go post 1,000 tweets with ease. | 0.990182 | 1 | 1 |
"
Fair use rationale for Image:Baby Don't Cry.PNG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Baby Don't Cry.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 0001 " | 0.003405 | 0 | 0 |
"
Are you fing kidding me? There are 30+ reliable sources listed in the pre-vandalism history of the page. This debate in this talk page has no importance and will not receive justice. I am making my objections public for the sake of posterity alone. If you want to see the sources:
Go look at the history of the page pre-vandalism.
Go look at the history of the talk page pre-vandalism.
Go look at the previous AfD discussion where 30+ sources are extensively discussed and analyzed, and consensus found that they were reliable according to the wikipedia definition of ""reliable"" which you have not familiarized yourself with.
This debate has already been done and it's very visible in the history of the page and the previous AfDs; the history which has not been consulted by the current deleters attacking this page. Without an ""admin in my pocket"" my claims fall on deaf ears; I understand this all too well. If you or your allies were interested in due process, you would examine the history instead of asking that all that labour be repeated. Your kind will always demand that others do all the work even when it has been done in exhaustive detail. When you've read this entire page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Law_of_One then you may speak without embarassing yourself. Anyone who has not read that entire page and understood the poles of the debate speaks from ignorance and exposes themselves as lazy deleters happy to erase hours and hours of work without a care. Shame on all of you for your intellectual laziness, dishonesty, and irresponsible deleter reflexes.
Screenshot of the Sources Pre-Vandalism
— Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) " | 0.452714 | 1 | 1 |
. It's hugely unlikely that it would even have become notable at all if she were lugging a mattress around to protest about, say, global warming | 0.000784 | 0 | 0 |
Man these bitches are so boring yo. Where the outgoing, fun, wild bitches at | 0.995367 | 1 | 1 |
Greinke you sneaky son of a bitch you | 0.994817 | 1 | 1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.