answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"0.88 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
1145
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.09.052 | dye (desorption, ligands substitution, isomerisation) Even though certified ageing tests exist for the PV industry according to international standards such as IEC 61646 In particular, DSCs employing various robust dyes combined with non-volatile electrolytes readily sustained their performance after 1000 h continuous solar light (1 sun) illumination On the other hand, long-term thermal stability of DSCs remains a highly challenging task at elevated temperatures (>80 °C), where thermal stress can accelerate degradation reactions or even create new degradation pathways Significant stability under thermal stress has been also observed in DSCs utilizing electrolytes with typical low-cost organic solvents (such as methoxypropionitrile, MPN) To mitigate the ensuing DSC degradation, a non-nitrile high boiling point organic solvent, tetraglyme (TGL) (), was originally applied to dissolve the iodide/triiodide redox shuttle, resulting in significantly improved durability of the cells at high temperatures; the efficiency of the TGL-cells was reduced by only 20% after a harsh ageing test of 2000 (light)+2000 (dark at 80 °C) hours DSCs of 0.88 cm2 active area were manufactured by Dyesol using standard Dyesol materials. | What is the value of active area? | 23748 |
{
"text": [
"6.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
310
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA02281J | Carboxylic acid or CA acted as an efficient anchoring group due to its advantages of easy synthesis and high injection efficiency.Diau and co-workers were the first to incorporate an ethynylcarboxyphenyl acceptor, diphenylamine donor and 3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl substituent porphyrin (YD1), achieving a PCE of 6.0%. | What is the value of PCE? | 67074 |
{
"text": [
"MAPbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
288
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.11.025 | Hence, the combined effects of lower Rct and higher Rrec value results in higher PCE of the post-synthesis treated PSC than the untreated PSC, justifying the increased FF and Voc.In this work, we investigated a post-synthesis treatment with bromide solution to improve the quality of the MAPbI3 perovskite film and the global performance of the ITO/PEDOT:PSS/MAPbI3/PCBM/Ag solar cell. | What is perovskite? | 9228 |
{
"text": [
"21.34mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1016/j.jssc.2019.05.027 | The PCE of device based on C60 ETL is 12.11%, with a Voc of 0.92V, a Jsc of 21.34mA/cm2 and a FF of 61.81%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 7504 |
{
"text": [
"108 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00474E | RBG-174 and COCO (as well as P1) display similar JSC values (around 3 mA cm−2) but P1 shows a higher VOC (108 mV) than the two other dyes (90 mV). | What is the value of VOC? | 73667 |
{
"text": [
"0.3 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
197
]
} | 10.1016/j.partic.2010.08.013 | After grinding for 0.5 h, the resulting colloidal suspension was deposited on a transparent conducting glass (Nippon Sheet Glass, SnO2:F with sheet resistance being 15 Ω/sq) with an active area of 0.3 cm2, by using the screen printing technique. | What is the value of active area? | 54660 |
{
"text": [
"10.18%"
],
"answer_start": [
169
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.047 | The C60-only device exhibited a PCE of 9.32% with a Voc of 0.946V, a Jsc of 17.78mAcm−2, and an FF of 55.39%, while the C70-only devices showed a slightly higher PCE of 10.18% with nearly the same Voc and Jsc but higher FF (61.93%). | What is the value of PCE? | 2945 |
{
"text": [
"12.72%"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104036 | The average PCE of FA0.1-based P-PSC improves from 12.72% to 15.45%, including a champion device having 16.50% obtained from backward scan. | What is the value of PCE? | 2975 |
{
"text": [
"10.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
177
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC03542C | After doping with tin fluoride and engineering the device with ZnO photonic crystals their best solar cell exhibited a VOC of 732 mV, JSC of 19.2 mA cm−2, FF of 0.72 and PCE of 10.2%. | What is the value of PCE? | 70999 |
{
"text": [
"0.721 V"
],
"answer_start": [
54
]
} | 10.1039/C9NJ00939F | Dye RDA-3 showed the better PV behavior with a Voc of 0.721 V, a Jsc of 6.64 mA cm−2 and a FF of 0.660 resulting in an efficiency of 3.17%.The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from COLCIENCIAS, Centre for Bioinformatics and Photonics-CIBioFi (BPIN 2013000100007) and Universidad del Valle. | What is the value of Voc? | 74181 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.083 | Due to the promising adhesion strength of 4.3±0.30MPa between Cu@Fe@Pt NWs catalyst layer and FTO glass substrate, the reduction in photocurrent stability is believed to come from the performance deterioration of catalysts. | What is substrate? | 42633 |
{
"text": [
"71%"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.060 | PEDOT:PSS/PPy exhibits the VOC, JSC, and FF of 0.75V, 14.27mA/cm2 and 71%, respectively, harvesting the overall efficiency of 7.60%, which is in a good comparison with that of Pt CE (7.73%). | What is the value of FF? | 27104 |
{
"text": [
"8.87%"
],
"answer_start": [
82
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2017.05.020 | Under the conditions of Li-TFSI/TBP at 15 mM/100mM, Q222-based PSC shows a PCE of 8.87%, yielding a Jsc of 15.30mWcm−2, a Voc of 916mV, a FF of 0.63. | What is the value of PCE? | 2571 |
{
"text": [
"12.23%"
],
"answer_start": [
200
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA06102A | These results indicate that AnC-900-2.0-based DSSC employing SM-315 as a superior organic sensitizer leads to a better power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 12.72% compared to that of a Pt-based DSSC (12.23%), due to the large fill factor enhancement arising from better electrocatalytic ability. | What is the value of PCE? | 65676 |
{
"text": [
"13.95mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
157
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.12.065 | Hence, the optimized weight ratio of 10wt% for P-TiO2 in the photoanode was obtained, and the resulting DSSC showed the VOC value of 0.77V, the JSC value of 13.95mA/cm2, the FF of 0.70, and the η value of 7.56%.After optimizing the TiO2 film thickness and the ratio of the light scatterer in the photoanode, the photovoltaic performances for the DSSCs composed of the P90 photoanode and those with a light scattering layer, i.e., P90/P-TiO2, and P90/C-TiO2 photoanodes, were compared. | What is the value of JSC? | 43985 |
{
"text": [
"3.85mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
141
]
} | 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.05.010 | The recorded performance data of B5a-based BHJSCs show little difference from that of B5b, with Voc values of 430 and 650mV, Jsc of 4.51 and 3.85mAcm−2, and FF of 38% and 34%, leading to low PCEs of 0.72% and 0.86%, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 33601 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
37
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA26577K | The active area of the solar cell is 0.25 cm2.UV-vis spectra of both dye solutions and adsorbed on TiO2 films were measured by a spectrophotometer (JASCO-670 UV/VIS). | What is the value of active area? | 71604 |
{
"text": [
"8.6 Ω"
],
"answer_start": [
346
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.06.078 | As shown in , the high frequency region corresponds to the charge-transfer process of the electrode/redox electrolyte (I−/I−3) interface, and the low frequency is mainly related to the Nernst diffusion process (semicircle) or Warburg diffusion process (sloped line) of I−/I−3 redox species , the Rct of 10.1 Ω for Si MCP counter electrode and of 8.6 Ω for SiNWs was obtained. | What is the value of Rct? | 39170 |
{
"text": [
"7.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
149
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06987H | Nevertheless, the improvement in device efficiency by using doped HTM 21 is merely half of the PCE increment of devices based on doped HTM Sp01 from 7.8% to 12.8%. | What is the value of PCE? | 13070 |
{
"text": [
"6.8 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
70
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.263 | At the 92 W/cm2, the PCE dropped to 2.68% with a reduced Jsc value of 6.8 mA/cm2. | What is the value of Jsc? | 50426 |
{
"text": [
"11.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
99
]
} | 10.1039/C4CS00309H | In terms of performances, N3 and N749-based DSSCs have similar VOC (∼720 mV), with η = 10% and η = 11.1%, for N3 and N749, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 64960 |
{
"text": [
"13.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
120
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.12.002 | The FF values show a relatively wide distribution, 0.39–0.68, hence causing the similar distribution of PCE values, 7.1–13.7%. | What is the value of PCE? | 8453 |
{
"text": [
"9.29%"
],
"answer_start": [
109
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA03541E | The PCE for the doped HTL is significantly higher than those for the individual components, i.e., 16.47% and 9.29% for PEDOT:PSS and NiPcS4, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 22507 |
{
"text": [
"0.86V"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.154 | The best performance is obtained when NH4I/MAI is 0.1 with Jsc of 15.31mA/cm2, Voc of 0.86V, FF of 0.72, and conversion efficiency of 9.49%. | What is the value of Voc? | 5161 |
{
"text": [
"4.33%"
],
"answer_start": [
96
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2014.03.086 | An optimal DSSC based on SDD4 with coadsorption of chenodeoxycholic acid exhibited highest η of 4.33%, which reached 82% of N719-based DSSC (5.25%). | What is the value of η? | 45525 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.009 | The series resistance (Rs), including the intrinsic resistance of electrode material and the contact resistance between electrode material and FTO substrate, can be estimated by the high frequency intercept at real axis a). | What is substrate? | 36325 |
{
"text": [
"5.58%"
],
"answer_start": [
338
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2012.09.018 | Usually, the addition of CDCA enhances the device performance through the high electron-injection yield from the dye into the TiO2 and the prevention of dye aggregation on the TiO2 surface (b), and those DSSCs were found to show increased photovoltaic parameters with maximum η value of 5.47% (Jsc= 10.42 mA/cm2, Voc= 0.71 V, FF = 0.74), 5.58% (Jsc= 12.27 mA/cm2, Voc= 0.70 V, FF = 0.65), 5.63% (Jsc= 11.17 mA/cm2, Voc= 0.69 V, FF = 0.73), respectively. | What is the value of η? | 44863 |
{
"text": [
"928 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
120
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA03741C | With a sequential deposition method, the MAPbI3 based device achieves a PCE of 10.4% with a Jsc of 17.5 mA cm−2, Voc of 928 mV, and fill factor (FF) of 0.70 at the light illumination of 100 mW cm−2 AM 1.5G. | What is the value of Voc? | 15294 |
{
"text": [
"5.87 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
95
]
} | 10.1016/j.microrel.2015.05.003 | As shown in , the J–V characteristics for DSSCs, the cell with FTO substrate is increased from 5.87 mA/cm2 to 6.09 mA/cm2 for the short-circuit current density (Jsc), increased from 0.5% to 0.57% for the fill factor, and from 2.24% to 2.67% for the photoelectric conversion efficiency, respectively.One of the important factors that influence the photoelectric conversion efficiency of a DSSC is the transparent substrate and its sheet resistance. | What is the value of Jsc? | 36668 |
{
"text": [
"1.07 V"
],
"answer_start": [
181
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA01074A | Amongst the annealing temperatures employed here, 145 °C gives the highest PCE of 15% calculated from a photocurrent density (Jsc) of 20.5 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.07 V and a fill factor (FF) of 68.5%. | What is the value of Voc? | 19325 |
{
"text": [
"1.14%"
],
"answer_start": [
134
]
} | 10.1039/C7NJ01184A | As shown in Table 2, the ZnTTTD dye exhibited the highest η of 3.51%, whereas the ZnTTEP and ZnTEP dyes showed a lower η of 2.15% and 1.14%, respectively.To explain this difference, the corresponding detailed photovoltaic performance parameters will be discussed. | What is the value of η? | 66825 |
{
"text": [
"76.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.072 | The reverse scan mode yielded an efficiency of 19.1%, with a JSC of 22.4 mA cm−2, a VOC of 1.12 V, an FF of 76.3%, while the forward scan mode gave a PCE of 18.8%, with a JSC of 22.4 mA cm−2, a VOC of 1.12 V, an FF of 74.9%. | What is the value of FF? | 4033 |
{
"text": [
"10.96 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
75
]
} | 10.1016/j.cplett.2017.09.044 | Similarly, DSSC fabricated with commercial P25 photoanode shows the Jsc of 10.96 mA/cm2, Voc of 0.704 V and FF of 58%, yielding a PCE of 4.47%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 49662 |
{
"text": [
"15.49%"
],
"answer_start": [
60
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA01303E | In our study, a stable power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 15.49% was achieved using this method. | What is the value of PCE? | 16373 |
{
"text": [
"0.763 V"
],
"answer_start": [
62
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA02755E | 5A(c), with Jsc, Voc, FF and PCE increasing to 18.55 mA cm−2, 0.763 V, 72.24% and 10.07%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 73960 |
{
"text": [
"6.31%"
],
"answer_start": [
206
]
} | 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.06.039 | It is noticeable that the DSSC using the PANI-27 CE had the best photovoltaic performance with a Jsc of 13.29 mA cm− 2, a Voc of 0.72 V, and a FF of 0.61, thus yielding a η of 5.92%, which is comparable to 6.31% of that assembled with the sputtered-Pt CE. | What is the value of η? | 24424 |
{
"text": [
"7.15%"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1039/C9TA03540K | Results show that ZnNb2O6 and ZnNb2O6/BPC as catalysts in DSSCs exhibit extraordinary photovoltaic performance with PCEs of 7.15% and 8.83%, respectively, higher than that of Pt catalysts (7.14%). | What is the value of PCE? | 71097 |
{
"text": [
"16.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
9
]
} | 10.1016/j.cclet.2016.11.009 | A PCE of 16.2% was received for PTAA using MAPbI3 as perovskite active material ) containing the strong electron withdrawing unit benzothiadiazole (BT). | What is the value of PCE? | 4240 |
{
"text": [
"0.69 V"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM13961H | It displayed a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 14.42 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.69 V, and a fill factor (ff) of 0.63, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency of 6.22%. | What is the value of Voc? | 62625 |
{
"text": [
"766.02 ± 0.52 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
137
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.062 | The optimized DSSC with 0.57 wt% of CB in PMMA matrix exhibits the highest photo-conversion efficiency of 5.52 ± 0.03% with Voc value of 766.02 ± 0.52 mV, Jsc value of 12.43 ± 0.04 mA cm−2 and FF value of 58.01 ± 0.02%. | What is the value of Voc? | 50857 |
{
"text": [
"10.05"
],
"answer_start": [
52
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00237G | The resulting performance shows VOC = 1.52 V, JSC = 10.05 mA cm−2, FF = 0.67, and a PCE = 10.23%. | What is ? | 22762 |
{
"text": [
"6.98%"
],
"answer_start": [
212
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA00083H | Owing to the superior light scattering effect, advantages of suppression charge recombination, and increased dye loading, the power conversion efficiency (η) of the SnO2 nanorod@TiO2 hybrid material electrode is 6.98%, much higher than that of the SnO2 nanorods electrode (3.95%) and P25 electrode (5.27%).Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs), with the benefits of being environmentally friendly, of low-cost, and having a facile fabrication process, have attracted great attention as an excellent source of future green energy. | What is the value of η? | 68443 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
187
]
} | 10.1039/C4NR03900A | In addition, the intersection of the cathodic branch with Y-axis is determined as limiting diffusion current density (Jlim), a parameter that depends on the diffusion coefficient (Dn) of I−/I3− redox couples at CE–electrolyte interface. | What is redox couples? | 71402 |
{
"text": [
"0.01 A/m2"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.043 | The Pt/BFO single crystal/Pt heterostructure showed an open-circuit voltage Voc∼13V and a short-circuit current density Jsc∼0.01 A/m2 under irradiation of λ=405nm []. | What is the value of Jsc? | 1396 |
{
"text": [
"5.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
156
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.215 | The viability of using CuI as a HTL has been demonstrated in planar heterojunction-based FTO/TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3−xClx/CuI/Au solar cells with a champion PCE of 5.8%. | What is the value of PCE? | 9426 |
{
"text": [
"6.55%"
],
"answer_start": [
113
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.10.004 | The highest η obtained from a DSSC with a TiO2 (P-25)/TiO2 (P-25) + 0.1 wt% Ru-TiO2+ Li0.01Ni0.99O (Test K9) was 6.55%. | What is the value of η? | 35443 |
{
"text": [
"7.38%"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA18729C | Interestingly, the enhancement in the power conversion efficiency up to η ∼ 7.38% (in forward scan) and ∼8.1% (in backward scan) is reached in the devices when we use vapour treatment to the perovskite films. | What is the value of η? | 22718 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
46
]
} | 10.1039/C8QM00620B | In addition, the larger energy offset between ITO and SnO2/C60-SAM was also reduced by the insertion of ZnO. | What is ? | 21828 |
{
"text": [
"0.44V"
],
"answer_start": [
115
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.02.040 | DSSC prepared using SZ-15 sample exhibited the highest PCE of 0.59%, with its maximum Jsc of 4.04mA/cm2 and Voc of 0.44V. | What is the value of Voc? | 50577 |
{
"text": [
"1.123±0.018V"
],
"answer_start": [
205
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.09.045 | The average open-circuit voltage (Voc) shows a similar tendency to the average short-circuit current density (Jsc), from 0.55M to 1.30M, enhanced from 0.960±0.021 to 1.131±0.013V, but slightly declines to 1.123±0.018V when the precursor concentration is 1.55M. | What is the value of Voc? | 8422 |
{
"text": [
"8.05%"
],
"answer_start": [
166
]
} | 10.1039/C8RA00004B | A typical device assembled with NiS2 hierarchical microspheres achieved an impressive PCE of 8.46% under AM1.5G illumination, higher that of pyrolysis Pt electrodes (8.05%). | What is the value of PCE? | 60616 |
{
"text": [
"0.708V"
],
"answer_start": [
92
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.052 | When NiS nanoarray film used as a CE, the photovoltaic parameters, Voc, Jsc, FF and PCE are 0.708V, 15.18mAcm−2, 0.66, and 7.10%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 26125 |
{
"text": [
"0.83 V"
],
"answer_start": [
248
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.010 | The MAPbI3−xClx mixed halide perovskite solar cells prepared by spin-coating of 3:1 MAI:PbCl2 in DMSO solution and subsequent heat-treatment at 100°C for 40min exhibited 0.83V Voc, 20.0mAcm−2 Jsc, 67% FF, and 11.1% η for forward scan condition and 0.83 Voc, 20.2mAcm−2, 69% FF, and 11.6% η for reverse scan condition. | What is the value of Voc? | 8869 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.07.004 | Perovskite films were deposited by spin-coating the CH3NH3PbI3 precursor at 5000rpm for 30s on a HTL-coated ITO glass substrate. | What is substrate? | 8681 |
{
"text": [
"20.09%"
],
"answer_start": [
69
]
} | 10.1039/C8NR00152A | The PCE of MA mixed perovskite films first increases to a maximum of 20.09% in MA0.1FACs0.15 PSC with Voc of 1.13 V, Jsc of 23.15 mA cm−2, and FF of 76.81% and then decreases to 18.24% with Voc of 1.12 V, Jsc of 22.81 mA cm−2, and FF of 71.40% as the concentration of MA increases to 0.2 in MA0.2FACs0.15.Based on the optimal FA (FA annealed at 150 °C), FACs (FACs0.15 annealed at 130 °C) and MAFACs (MA0.1FACs0.15 annealed at 110 °C) perovskites, we comprehensively investigated their morphology and optoelectronic properties together with the carrier dynamics and electron–hole recombination at the ETL/perovskite/HTL interfaces. | What is the value of PCE? | 20430 |
{
"text": [
"(FAPbI3)x(MAPbBr3)1−x"
],
"answer_start": [
31
]
} | 10.1039/C8EE02172D | (Lumtec).A mixture solution of (FAPbI3)x(MAPbBr3)1−x based perovskite precursor was prepared by dissolving 1.32 M PbI2, 1.08 M FAI, 0.12 M PbBr2, 0.24 M MAI and 0.12 M MABr in DMF/DMSO mixed solvent (v/v = 4:1) and stirred overnight at room temperature.Laser-patterned ITO glass (sheet resistance = 15 Ω per square) was pre-cleaned in an ultrasonic bath of soap water, deionized water, acetone and ethanol for 30 min each, and treated in an ultraviolet–ozone chamber for 30 min. | What is perovskite? | 19615 |
{
"text": [
"0.603 V"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1016/j.crci.2012.10.015 | With the addition of the LiTFSI:LiI = 0.116:1 in the CPE, the performance of the DSSC at AM1.5 increased to 4.82% with Jsc= 11.78 mA/cm2, Voc= 0.603 V and FF= 0.67, better than the 3.6% of the original DSSC with Jsc= 8.75 mA/cm−2, Voc= 0.648 V and FF= 0.635 and the 4.32% of the LiClO4 modified CPE with Jsc= 11.18 mA/cm2, Voc= 0.597 V and FF= 0.647. | What is the value of Voc? | 44627 |
{
"text": [
"10"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.119 | The smaller semicircle in the high frequencies (>1×102Hz) range corresponded to the redox charge transfer kinetics at the Pt/electrolyte interface while the larger semicircle in the low frequencies (1−102Hz) range represented the electron transfer impedance (Rrec) at the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface []. | What is TiO2? | 35809 |
{
"text": [
"734 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
50
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA02888H | The overall efficiency reaches up to 10.7% (Voc = 734 mV, Jsc = 22.58 mA cm−2 and FF = 64.6%), which is comparable to those of the most efficient iodide-based DSSCs. | What is the value of Voc? | 69342 |
{
"text": [
"0.67 V"
],
"answer_start": [
101
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA26995D | When MnO2 is used as a CE of N719-sensitized solar cells, the photovoltaic characteristics are Voc = 0.67 V, Jsc = 11.92 mA, FF = 0.41, and PCE = 3.03%. | What is the value of Voc? | 73289 |
{
"text": [
"7.30%"
],
"answer_start": [
78
]
} | 10.1039/C5TC01183C | 200 mV increase of Voc values leading to PCE values comprised between 3.80 to 7.30%.The values of the fill factors are high 70–75% and independent of the structure of the sensitizer. | What is the value of PCE? | 75082 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
338
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.10.018 | Since the commercial electrolyte led to saturation phenomena, the correct collection of its spectrum was made by diluting the electrolyte 1:500 in acetonitrile.I–V measurements were carried out using a source measure unit (model 2440, Keithley) and a solar simulator (Newport 91195A class A) under AM 1.5G irradiation, with power output (100 mW/cm2) calibrated by a Si reference solar cell.IPCE spectra were acquired in DC mode employing a 100-W QTH lamp (Newport) as light source and a 150-mm Czerny Turner monochromator (Omni-λ 150, Lot-Oriel) without superimposed bias light. | What is the value of solar? | 34054 |
{
"text": [
"1.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
232
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | developed a series of perovskite-based mesoscopic or PHJ solar cells using spin-coated NiOx thin film, nanocrystalline NiO or electrodeposited NiO film on a glass/ITO or FTO electrode as the HTM, and the PCE increased from 5.7% to 11.6% was obtained finally.Apart from the widely used TiO2/perovskite/HTM configuration, another configuration, in which n-type metal oxides combine with perovskites to form a p–n junction without additional HTMs, was developed. | What is the value of PCE? | 13408 |
{
"text": [
"547mV"
],
"answer_start": [
72
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.078 | SNA7 cell showed the highest value of Voc amongst the fabricated cells (547mV). | What is the value of Voc? | 41073 |
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
255
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.02.011 | In contrast, PbI2 peak showed with considerable intensity along with perovskite peaks for S2 and S3, which would be expected for partial dissolution of Pb perovskite overlayer during CuSCN deposition shows optical absorption for glass/FTO/bl-TiO2/m-TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3/CuSCN film using various solvents. | What is perovskite? | 8389 |
{
"text": [
"5.31%"
],
"answer_start": [
196
]
} | 10.1039/C7CP08445E | With the optimized concentration of 1.8 wt% Au NRs, the device exhibited a JSC of 15.74 mA cm−2 and PCE of 8.86%, whereas the device without the Au NRs exhibited a JSC of 12.45 mA cm−2 and PCE of 5.31%. | What is the value of PCE? | 72051 |
{
"text": [
"71.48%"
],
"answer_start": [
71
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.107630 | The flexible PSC exhibits 1.06/1.05V Voc, 19.66/19.45mA/cm2 Jsc, 72.11/71.48% FF, and 15.03/14.60% PCE for the forward/reverse scans, respectively. | What is the value of FF? | 4220 |
{
"text": [
"375 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
179
]
} | 10.1039/C3CP55457K | Under AM 1.5 illumination, for the CuGaO2-based solar cells with the Co3+/2+ (dtb-bpy) electrolyte, the two groups obtained an impressive Voc of 357 mV with the P1 sensitizer and 375 mV with the PMI-NDI sensitizer. | What is the value of Voc? | 71498 |
{
"text": [
"0.4 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
19
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.174 | A portion of 0.4 × 0.4 cm2 was selected as the active area by removing the side portions by scrapping. | What is the value of active area? | 29897 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
130
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.03.059 | The as-prepared hybrid nanocomposite based photo-anode displayed a high PCE 8.39%, which is unusually greater than that of the GO/TiO2 (6%), and SnO2/TiO2 (6.27%) photo-anodes. | What is anodes? | 47402 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
181
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.020 | The liquid electrolyte was injected into the gap between the TiO2 photoanode and the CE.The photovoltaic performance of the DSCs was performed under simulated AM 1.5G illumination (100mWcm−2, PECL15, Peccell, Japan) using a Keithley digital source meter (Keithley 2601, USA). | What is the value of illumination? | 42667 |
{
"text": [
"63.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
234
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06987H | 7).However, devices utilizing doped HTM 11 displayed an overall better device performance (JSC = 21.0 mA cm−2; VOC = 0.92 V; FF = 67.0%; PCE = 12.9%) compared to HTM 12 with the added additives (JSC = 20.6 mA cm−2; VOC = 0.88 V; FF = 63.0%; PCE = 11.5%). | What is the value of FF? | 13018 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
} | 10.1039/C8QO00788H | We also carried out water contact angle measurements on varied ETLs/ITO surfaces, and the water contact angles were 34.6°, 40.2°, 79.8°, 75.7°, 94.8°, 77.6°, 82.6°, 35.6° and 18.5° for ITO, ZnO, PFN-Br, FPPI, FPPI:PFN-Br, Bis-FPPI, Bis-FPPI:PFN-Br, Bis-FIMG and Bis-FITG, respectively (Fig. | What is ? | 17238 |
{
"text": [
"63.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
170
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.07.009 | By comparison, for other samples S2.5, S5.0, S7.5, S10, the VOC were 0.91V, 0.92V, 0.95V, 0.98V, the Jsc were 17.1mAcm−2, 17.3mAcm−2, 18.1mAcm−2, 16.8mAcm−2, the FF were 63.7%, 64.0%, 64.2%, 63.7% and PCE were 9.9%,10.2%,11%, 10.5%, respectively, as shown in . | What is the value of FF? | 1760 |
{
"text": [
"12.01mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
127
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.09.009 | Afterwards, the best performance of the solar cell based on WD15 with hexyl substituted on DTF unit was achieved (η=6.63%, Jsc=12.01mAcm−2, Voc=746mV, and ff=0.74). | What is the value of Jsc? | 35399 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
129
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.01.033 | The photocurrent-voltage (J−V) characteristics of the DSSCs were measured by Keithley 2400 source meter under simulated AM 1.5G (100mW/cm2) illumination with a solar light simulator (Pecell-L15, Japan) without mask. | What is the value of illumination? | 56660 |
{
"text": [
"15.72%"
],
"answer_start": [
216
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.100 | In addition, we explored the co-effect of spiro-OMeTAD and a second additive poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) in anti-solution, demonstrating perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 15.72% based on the configuration of FTO/TiOx/PCBM/PVSK-GHJ/Au owing to the passivation effect of PMMA. | What is the value of PCE? | 9770 |
{
"text": [
"69.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA10975C | Comparatively, the PM6:IDT6CN-4F-based OSCs showed a slightly lower PCE of 10.88% resulting from a VOC of 0.859 V, a JSC of 18.34 mA cm−2 and a FF of 69.1%. | What is the value of FF? | 18053 |
{
"text": [
"0.68 V"
],
"answer_start": [
129
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA13667B | In the present work, the device with electrolyte A2 exhibited slightly reduced open circuit voltage Voc of 0.53 V as compared to 0.68 V for the device with electrolyte A1. | What is the value of Voc? | 75608 |
{
"text": [
"0.706V"
],
"answer_start": [
84
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.10.014 | Under standard AM 1.5G 1 sun (100mW/cm2) illumination condition, VOC increases from 0.706V (SB1) to 0.731V (SB2) and to 0.757V (SB3), while little change in JSC (11.07mA/cm2 for SB1, 10.71mA/cm2 for SB2 and 10.90mA/cm2 for SB3) is observed. | What is the value of VOC? | 40569 |
{
"text": [
"2.79%"
],
"answer_start": [
93
]
} | 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.035 | Meanwhile, an excellent PCE of 6.94%, superior to the reported PCE in previous works (2.63%, 2.79%, 4.98%, and 5.52%), is achieved. | What is the value of PCE? | 43312 |
{
"text": [
"10.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
220
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA07507F | The device without any HTM demonstrates a short circuit current density (Jsc) of 16.1 mA cm−2, an open circuit (Voc) of 0.93 V, a fill factor (FF) of 67.2%, and results in an overall power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 10.1%, which is consistent with previous reports. | What is the value of PCE? | 20355 |
{
"text": [
"23.55%"
],
"answer_start": [
183
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.009 | Additionally, the effect of various organic and inorganic HTMs such as, P3HT, CuSbS2, Cu2O and CuSCN on the PV parameters was also studied and it was found that the PCE improved from 23.55% to 26.74% and Voc from 1130mV to 1180mV, when Spiro-OMeTAD was substituted by CuSCN as HTM. | What is the value of PCE? | 4329 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.04.030 | After drying at room temperature, NiCu bimetallic-graphene coated FTO substrates were annealed at 300 °C for 15 min to remove the binder and obtain the NiCu bimetallic-graphene based counter electrode.The fabrication and measurements of DSSCs was carried out according to a previously reported method The surface morphology of the as-obtained NiCu bimetallic-graphene composite was studied by transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL JEM-2010, Japan) operated at 200 kV equipped with EDX analysis to get normal and high resolution images. | What is substrate? | 36946 |
{
"text": [
"0.73V"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1016/j.cap.2017.03.014 | The Voc, Jsc, and FF of the corresponding DSSC were found to be 0.73V, 14.23mAcm−2, and 60%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 26239 |
{
"text": [
"16.25mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
46
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.08.102 | However, the Jsc of device 5 is determined as 16.25mAcm−2, which is much lower than that of device 4. | What is the value of Jsc? | 53823 |
{
"text": [
"8.77%"
],
"answer_start": [
99
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.063 | Consequently, the highest η of 9.58% was obtained by using this symbiotic structure, compared with 8.77% of the well-defined TiO2 microspheres without ammonia treatment (N0). | What is the value of η? | 47817 |
{
"text": [
"0.52±0.03%"
],
"answer_start": [
189
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.106 | The surface area and dye adsorption of the single-crystal rutile TNRs are increased significantly, the Jsc and η of single-crystal rutile TNRs based DSSCs are increased from 1.47mAcm−2 and 0.52±0.03% to 9.03mAcm−2 and 4.14±0.07% respectively.Compared to P25 TiO2 nanoparticles based DSSCs, the light-harvesting efficiency of the single-crystal rutile TNRs based DSSCs is higher. | What is the value of η? | 31416 |
{
"text": [
"3.13%"
],
"answer_start": [
22
]
} | 10.1039/C2CP40900C | 12.85 mA cm−2) and η (3.13% vs. | What is the value of η? | 60201 |
{
"text": [
"0.06cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
59
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.09.045 | The active area for all devices was fixed by using a mask (0.06cm2). | What is the value of active area? | 8418 |
{
"text": [
"0.81 V"
],
"answer_start": [
123
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.12.009 | The approximately 12 μm thick photoanode film made of HTMS demonstrated Jsc of 12.56 mA/cm2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.81 V, and PCE of 5.9%. | What is the value of Voc? | 31405 |
{
"text": [
"0.09cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
452
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.095 | After rotary evaporation at 30°C for 3h, final MPII can be obtained.Full-ionic liquid imbibed poly(AA/GR) gel electrolyte was prepared according to the following procedures The ionic liquid loading could be calculated according to the following equation:where Wt (g) and W0 (g) were the masses of full-ionic liquid imbibed gel electrolyte and pure matrix, respectively.A layer of TiO2 nanocrystal anode film with a thickness of 10μm and active area of 0.09cm2 was prepared by coating the TiO2 colloid using a doctor blade technique, followed by sintering in air at 450°C for 30min. | What is the value of active area? | 32044 |
{
"text": [
"3%"
],
"answer_start": [
164
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA06823H | Ripening of the DSCs occurs and after 7 days, the dependence of η on the halo-substituent is I > Cl ≈ F ≈ Br; the highest η is 3.16% for [Cu(1)(5)]+ compared to 7.63% for N719 (a relative efficiency of 41.4% versus N719 set at 100%). | What is the value of η? | 75584 |
{
"text": [
"0.75 V"
],
"answer_start": [
121
]
} | 10.1039/C6NJ02615J | Moreover, the π–π conjugation affects the conduction band of the TiO2 nanotube arrays, decreasing the Voc from 0.77 V to 0.75 V. | What is the value of Voc? | 69400 |
{
"text": [
"0.751 V"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.12.019 | Dye-sensitized solar cell (DSC) using the membrane electrolyte exhibited an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.751 V, a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 16.260 mA cm−2 and a fill factor (FF) of 0.684 under an incident light intensity of 1000 W m−2 yielding an energy conversion efficiency (η) of 8.35%. | What is the value of Voc? | 55455 |
{
"text": [
"444 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA16399K | Moreover, the open-circuit photovoltage (Voc) for DSSCs based on OUK-1 (448 mV) and OUJ-1 (444 mV) is lower than that of NI-6 (460 mV and 523 mV for 3.1 × 1016 and 6.9 × 1016 molecules per cm2, respectively). | What is the value of Voc? | 64752 |
{
"text": [
"4.95%"
],
"answer_start": [
44
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.152 | Although the compromising η of 7.64%±5% and 4.95%±13% have not been certified yet, the small deviation and high reproducibility demonstrate that bifacial DSSCs with excellent photovoltaic performances can be realized using the method reported here. | What is the value of η? | 31776 |
{
"text": [
"0.44V"
],
"answer_start": [
93
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.02.040 | The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 0.59% is achieved with Jsc of 4.04mA/cm2 and Voc of 0.44V for the DSSC in which the M-SILAR deposited 1-D ZnO NRs based thin film is used as the photoanode. | What is the value of Voc? | 50576 |
{
"text": [
"15.12±0.67%"
],
"answer_start": [
60
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.100 | It can be seen that introducing PMMA leads to better PCE of 15.12±0.67%, especially enhanced VOC of 1.07±0.01V and FF of 68.4±1.8%. | What is the value of PCE? | 9766 |
{
"text": [
"3.13%"
],
"answer_start": [
65
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.07.053 | These dyes displayed power conversion efficiency (PCE) of η=1.72–3.13% where co-sensitized ZnT(Mes)P(CN-COOH)(N719) dye demonstrated maximum PCE efficiency up to 5.35%, with a Jsc of 11.8mAcm−2, a Voc of 630mV and a fill factor (FF) of 0.72.As the global energy demand increased from the last decades, there is an urgent requirement to look for new sustainable and renewable energy sources to fulfil the advance energy demand for the next generation Porphyrins, first reported as sensitizers for DSSC by Grätzel and co-workers in 1991 Functionalization of porphyrin at β-position provide a new way to synthesize β-functionalized porphyrin dyes for DSSCs To improve the efficiency of β-substituted porphyrins for DSSC, herein, we have synthesized three β-substituted push-pull Zn(II) porphyrin dyes by varying the substituents at meso- and β-positions as shown in β-monoformyl porphyrins were utilized as the precursors for the targeted porphyrin dyes in which formyl group undergo Knoevenagel condensation with cyanoacetic acid to introduce cyano-carboxylic acid as the acceptor group. | What is the value of η? | 33813 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.