text
stringlengths 6
5k
| racial_origin
int64 0
3
| gender_sex
int64 0
3
| religion
int64 0
3
| ability
int64 0
3
| violence
int64 0
3
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Megadeth album article
This clearly isn't the first time you've made your own unconstructive edits. Put your goggles back on you nerd and sort yourself out. My edit was perfectly valid. Suck on it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
"
noindex and search engines
Hi, Bugs. I have a sandbox where I'm working on an article called Palin Derangement Syndrome. It didn't have noindex. I went to Google and searched Palin Derangement Syndrome wikipedia kenatipo, and it didn't find anything. Are we certain that search engines search sandboxes? speak! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hello==
What is vandalism? Please help me out, I'm new to wikipedia.
== | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Talk Contributions " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Oh you scared me !!! I am so much terrified by your threats bastard. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Thanks
Thanks for the heads-up about changing redirects to direct links! I'll change back the mistakes. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Raccoon dog
Hi, not sure if I was supposed to comment on your revision here or on the talk page of the article, so I asked a question about your edit on the article talk page. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Problems with comunication?
I sense some angst coming from pretty much all your writings. However, I love the attempt to sound smart when you write by stretching out all your sentences into the longest ever recorded sentences, and saying rude things, and continuing to ramble on my user talk page like this, and going, and going, and calling people idiots. IMO it might be possible that you're in need of counseling. I have a feeling that you will be responding really fast too, since you seem to be on here 23-24 hours a day. Are you married? no no, it's ok, lets just talk about it, now come on. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
I really think that if there's any information on this page that isn't already on Comparison of web browsers, it should be moved there and this page deleted. It's really very unsightly to have a seperate page for something that is a proper subset of either List of web browsers or Comparison of web browsers. 70.233.75.157 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Look, if you want to contribute constructively, no one's stopping you. But that kind of behavior is rather disruptive. T § " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Will one turn it green only if live-broadcasting from the border gate is presented ? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"I like what you've asked. Why do we see our 'altering' of the natural environment as intrinsically destructive? Some questions that come to mind- I dont know how important they are-: ""What would a local diet without 'imported food species' have looked like?"" ""Is it wrong to 'import' food to a region where it doesn't normally grow?"" ""What is the merit of returning to an 'indigenous diet', and is this even possible, considering the loss of TEKW and indigenous species?"" ""What constitutes 'indigenous' species, considering many species were 'imported' by wind, birds, and sometimes even the indigenous people themselves from other regions?""
I will comment and work on the exec summary you've started, on Monday afternoon. Tuesday and Wednesday will have to be a lot of wiki-checking and e-mailing back and forth to get this precis looking presentable. -MD
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Real Beginning of Use==
You seem to ignore that the original use of the Motto ""new world oder"" began with the [Illuminati]
that was quickly banned by the Holy Roman Emperor but many feel survived in the follow on organization
the [Bilderberg Club]. /s/ kitchen of khartoom 8th 69.121.221.97
==" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A few of them were charged in the INA trials (that page discusses the trials generally in more detail) along with members of the INA proper, as mentioned in the text, and presumably the rest would have been. But because of the tension the trials produced, most of the trials were halted before independence, presumably including those of Legion soldiers. All the Indians who fought for the Axis were released in 1947, including the three who had been sentenced—but as the British insisted they were never allowed to serve in the new Indian Army. —innotata | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Softening point
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Softening point article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
DONT MESS WITH AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANY ARTICLE I CREATE AND IS MINE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
edit: cool stop sign dude, it makes your warning almost seem threatening
-snake out-
Sintheg2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
I'll tell you what's unhelpful George, and that's you. Now go away and try pulling someone else's chain. Fatuorum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
(as you obviously did to get my employer in the first place) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This page seems a little misleading. The reason that the midpoint rule gives an accurate answer is that the acceleration is constant. The midpoint is actually the analytical solution when the acceleration is constant. However, this is not generally applicable to systems where the acceleration is not constant. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I am discussing on the talk page. I am using quotes every time you revert something challenging it's accuracy. You have 3 reverts on the article. I have zero. This is a problem. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
", 8 December 2005 (UTC)
[resetting indents for ease of readability]
you have to justify its use: I dispute that assertion, but, in any case, I justify its use by pointing out that I added the tag after I noticed that an anon user, presumably a novice, had disputed the netrality, but neglected to add the tag. Furthermore, I note that the reasons for which that user disputed the neutrality have not yet been addressed. Your alelgations of disruption are unfounded. Since you currently have the articel tagegd as ""in use"", kindly restore the tag. 16:42" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Perhaps if both questions had been asked in the same survey: ""do you understand the scientific method?"" and ""do you believe in ESP?""; and the results had shown a significantly greater level of ignorance of the scientific method amongst ESP believers than others, then your conclusion might be valid. As it is, you have two different surveys about two different things and you cannot simply join up the results to show what you want to show. Consider if a third survey had shown that 99% of the population believes the world is round; could you then conclude that the vast majority of those that believe the world is round only do so because they do not understand the scientific method? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
/policy and consensus not in their favor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Robert (Rob) Fernandez
Tampa, Florida, USA
I have more shall I share | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hey!
I apologized!
But the way you were talking was kind of deceptive... | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Errol, unless you explain why you say you have ""reason to doubt"" the veracity of the transcript, you're just being provocative and insulting. Come on, that's a viscious accusation and you should back it up properly not with vague innuendo. So I will ask you once again, who told you that the transcript is fraudulent? If you won't say, that says it all. Your reference to the judicial process is so misplaced it's not funny. If you're calling me or, perhaps more importantly EPO, fraudulent, you should explain why and not simply say that a little birdy told you so.
As for the tape itself, God, I have no idea where it is. What happened is this. Either Rick Wallace sent me a copy which I kept and David Stirling another which he transcribed or he sent me one which I forwarded to David. It was a long time ago and I just don't remember.
What is your relationship with premies, by the way?
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Well it ain't my fault that your fellow admin is to thick to check the history, when I deleted your polite warning as read, and then proceedes to aggravate the nest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
"
March 2008
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please don't post original essays here. See WP:NOR and WP:V. ""Many people believe"" is not a reliable source. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I've taken care of that part of things as well. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
And note if you have your doubts. 12:54 AM over here. Raining, last I checked. I'm out in Dhanmondi (what kind of a stupid name is that?), in this apartment my imbecile Bangladeshi dad rented. Road number 5. Next to 'Eastern University' (what the hell is the thing with university names and compass directions over here?)
Fact is, you people murdered my mom. And my idiot dad still loves your stinking country and you stinking apes, even as his wife lies six feet under thanks to you animals. And I'll never get justice, will I? You bastards will keep living, and polluting the free world with your filth. If I could kill every one of you, I would.
But I'll settle for killing a few. | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
Icecats hockey
Your a fucking douchebag whyd you delete this```` | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
" worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(But what's this?! Fergus at CV.) Ok, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This is right. The applause came right after Meyer said Kerry should have been president. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Anomalous phenomena
Hey WDM, you did such a great job of pushing parapsychology through to GA and FA status, I was wondering if you'd review another article that I worked on and make recommendations on it. Like a year or two ago anomalous phenomena was the controversial paranormal article of the time and suffered many edit wars, so I rewrote it, drawing quite a bit from the falsification article. It's been sitting there for some time unedited, so it's stable, and (I think) pretty well-written. It probably needs some work, so let me know what you think. Is it GA worthy, potentially FA worthy? '''''' (talk to me) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
¬_¬...Dude!!: Not, helping. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
When I was a vandal(the horrible past)|When I was a vandal(the horrible past) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
There are some parts of the article regarding the theory of The Venus Project that I disagree with, but on the whole it seems to be an outstanding piece of work. There is a lot of stuff about Jacque Fresco that I would have never known about if this article had never been written. Very nice, short, interesting biography; well done. I like it. ( ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
No it doesn't. It misrepresents the source material on multiple levels. ""Some of those colleagues take issue""? It says it infuruates his former collegeages. ""Heated""? Now, here's your POV exposed. You're going to characterize the tone of Lopez's comments? And what's with the use of legalese? ""Testimony?"" ""Attested"". What courtroom are we talking about here? ""not acceepted by the majority of his colleagues"" It says that his theories are ""absolutely ludicrous"". This is a perfect example of trying to ""neutralize"" the source rather than being neutral. The current text neutrally presents the actual source material in an accurate manner. Your version does not. " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"So you refuse to delete these because ""they were from January"" (actually, also February), but the page of mine you deleted was also from the same time, and also contained no personal information. Why the double-standard? Because IronDuke asked first?
" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fuck of
You fuck of...212.253.147.120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
OK, thank you. Now, do I have to accept it or something? ' (T · C ·' E) " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
English, Scottish, Welsh, and Northern Irish nationality
Is there an English, Scottish, Welsh, or Northern Irish nationality? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PUTIN did it! And you know it!
And thats a neutral point of view. Exactly 70 years after the Katyn massacre when you Russkie vodka drinking swines killed 22,000 of Polands intelligentsia they die again at the same place, what the fuck are the odds of that KGB shithead?? Or do you prefer to be called a FSB cunt? And robbing dead people, dont get me started here Russkie. Naturally there will be NO hard core evidence .... as usual but everybody knows thats Stalin boy KGB agent Putin is behind it, real Die Hard 2 material. Couldnt Putin just have killed those he hated but not all? Like when that Putin-haying female reporter was killed on Putins birthday, you dig? | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
No maybe not because if I try to I'll be just turned away on the excuse that my case cannot be considered valid since I was disruptive. There's no point in trying to make a ANI report against an admin no matter what I think or believe. If I can't convincingly prove it then I better keep my comments and claims to myself. I'll keep that in mind. Also it's discouraging to see that my unblock was turned away because 24 hours isn't a long time. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Why do you care so much? Unanimous with less than four people? With others not allowed to contribute to the discussion? Give it a rest for a while as I am too busy to deal with this further now. Notability?? Are you going to search the tens of thousands of pages with actors, singers, and whoever else and find who you can delete? Take a break. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"==Rsazevedo you lied to me==
Rsazevedo, you said that Wikipedia ""is not the place for nationalistic displays"" but you displayed an incredible degree of nationalism when you created a page redirect just to get your precious Copacabana Bolivia on top of the alphabetical list.
But whatever, I would never create page redirects just to satisfy my nationalist desires and by doing so corrupt the Wikipedia spirit. I rather have Copacabana Rio on the bottom of that list because I am impartial.
Don't worry your Copacabana (Bolivia) is top of list at Wikipedia's expense. I am just saddened that you don't walk the talk.
" | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
That's not how citing works. What claim is being used by what book? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Why the fuck do you assholes keep deleting the angry video game nerds page, you have articles on people way less notable than him, fuck you youpedantic fuck, I mean jesus christ who the fuck decides to spend their time editing wikipedia, you guys think youre part of something special or something? Noone cares, pedantic fucks, FUCK YOU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
I know this article probably faithfully represents local mythology, it is a badly flawed myth ... either it is just that way, or someone needs to check what they've written and align it properly with some sort of historical reference.
Assuming that J.C existed (before anyone picks my grammar apart!);
There is no record in the new testament stating he was born in a stable, that's a misinterpretation, and as far as I know a fairly recent one, based on references to animals and mangers being inside a house.
The house in question is in Bethlehem according to two gospels and a prophecy.
Although the place of birth is disputed (and, I think, it is generally thought the original gospels had him being born in Nazareth) the passages about Mary and Joseph staying in a house/stable relate to a supposed trip to Bethlehem.
Bethlehem is a long way from Nazareth
Either the story should say Bethlehem, or the stone is some sort of crib from a house in Nazareth, or the myth itself is based on an alternative historical version (I was going to say inaccurate, but given we've already got two contradictory and both disputed accounts of possible event it's all a bit of a matter of opinion anyway!) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
User:The Banner previous NightOfTheBigWind
Hi,
Do you remember this?
Given that context I have to concern when the same user (new name) disruptively meddles in a thread exclusively to point out my past topic bans attempting to prevent an user from me:. Thanks. ¿? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reply: Vandalism
Ok. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
About the Block
If you ever block me ever again, then I WILL NOT HAVE IT! *Bangs a Table*. ( ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Violation of their rights as a Wikipedia user* | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
{| style=""background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"" cellpadding=""0""
|style=""border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;""|
Hello, Pfm77! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! (talk • contribs)
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;""
|style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored
How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article
Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips
Where to ask questions or make comments
Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research
Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons
List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry
Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability
|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA""
! The community
|-
|style=""color:#000""|
Build consensus • Resolve disputes
[[Wikipedia:Assume g | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dear Arthur,
Again LOOOK. I didnt reverse 14 revisions. Some among those 14 were reverts & autobots. I did include the good edits into the version I save. I do consider others. U took out a chunk @ the end which is important 4 understanding y the event is listed under controversy.
Did I say I own it? No I didnt. Thanks. 70.108.92.126 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
How about you let us all know once you have gazed into your crystal ball. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The party about bacteria without cell walls living inside macrophages has no relevance to this sarcoidosis article, it is a well known escape mechanism bacteria use to get past immune defenses- more relevant to a microbiology article then to this sarcoidosis article. *** Cheers. Thio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Support The most well known Las Vegas is Las Vegas, Nevada. There's no need to have the state name follow the city. Also, I do believe we need an article for the Metro Area and the City Proper but the article doesnt need to be followed by (city). Just have one be Las Vegas, and the other be the Las Vegas Metropolitan Area. All this discussion is unnecessary. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ryan Drummond
Are you trying to force my hand? Because it's in your best interest not to do that. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Giulio Clovio
(b Grisone [Grizane], Croatia, 1498; d Rome, 3 Jan 1578). Italian painter and illuminator of Croatian birth. The most important illuminator of the 16th century, he was a 'Michelangelo of small works', according to Vasari. Many of his documented works are dispersed or untraced, and some attributions are controversial, but his secure oeuvre gives a clear idea of his stylistic influences and development. Although much of his inspiration came from Raphael and Michelangelo, he developed his own visual language, brilliantly translating their monumental forms for work on the smallest scale.
Source: Grove Art, Oxford University Press. ( Reference. ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
nope...
NO i do NOT fucing think so!!!!!
No way!
YOU WILL NOT GET AWAY WITH IT!
CAPICHE???
@% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Circumcellions
Though certainly no expert, this account seems consistent with Edward Gibbon's Decline and Fall. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Template:Pic
There have been discussions as to whether Template:Pic, which you created, should be orphaned and deleted. You might want to state your opinion at Template talk:Pic. Also, I suppose that the same will be said of Template:Picp eventually, although I have no intention of dealing with that at the moment. If you're interested in the sister projects templates, by the way, I suggest that you vote at WP:TFD#Template:Sisterproject as to whether the {{Sisterproject}} template should be kept. 20:53, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
very urgent
Hi this is a cool dude calling for a special attention to nadar (caste)article. the list of notable personalities contains weasel words and names that cant be found not alone in the wiki but also in entire google data base. special deletion and auto deletion of such crap should be maintainted § | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
. The only thing I can think of that made them different was that they had self-confidence, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
May
Why was May (Pokemon) not merged? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I agree, it's extremely disappointing that such a major player would have such a poor article. I disagree, though, that it is unreferenced. It is actually badly referenced. There are a list of references at the end, but no inline citations/footnotes. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
TODAY our Kleargear types have finally gotten around to REMOVING the fraudulent endorsements on their scam website. Sadly the many Wiki censors won't get to look at obvious fraud, not that ever bothered to look at an active public fraud in the first place.
Ultra special kudos for wales for basically censoring every single fukkin breath moving forward. Thats gotta be Badgeworthy and you have my vote for the next un. Arsesome work. BIG BADGES all around says I, and NO I won't ""Donate"" a freakin bloody damn nickle for this enterprise. Pfffft. !!!!" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
The second of the two images was the one with the dubious copyright. It was the comments to 128 I was referring to, but the actress didn't specify exactly which image she was commenting on. However the second is off some random website, so I'm confident it shouldn't be on the Commons, let alone even considered fair use. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Closure and Deletion of Joel Fram
Hi I'm not sure if I agree withe deletion of this article. I remember reading it an arts related context - he's amusician and writer but the details elude me. I would have contributed to the debate on deletion but was on a wikibreak. Could you please do a TempUndelete so that I can consider an appropriate course of action (if any). Thanks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
. '''' talk
== 3RR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
'Personal attack site'
Some background information might be of help to administrators. And to yourself, of course. When I read those links, it seems that your administration and editing pattern raises some eyebrows from several people. I would like to advise you to read those topics well and think about how to solve those problems.
BTW: Wikipedia Review is not anti-Wikipedia (although several users are), but tries to provide an independent platform for commentaries on Wikipedia policies. As such, Wikipedia Review is of great benefit and indispensible for Wikipedia. (Talk | Contribs 25px) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
However they are powered, it is probably ironic. - 14:13, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please
SAVE DAVIS' SWEET ROCKIN' WIKIPEDIA WEBPAGE. HE IS ALL I HAVE LEFT. HE IS THE RULER OF MANKIND AND HE KNOWS HOW TO ROCK. PRAISE JESUS, MICHAEL ROW THE BOAT ASHORE. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
"Hi there! I noticed your edits to River Suir. I hope you enjoy your time here and decide to regularly contribute. I've some useful links listed below. If you're interested in Irish topics, you may be interested in the notice board for Irish wikipedians.
First off, welcome to Wikipedia. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. You can introduce yourself on the new users page.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or contributing: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too. If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
♣ talk 19:19, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)" | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
And why is it strange? | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Painting of the ArbcomPutting Names to Faces
My initial two would be that the two off by theirselves, looking as if they are plotting some nefarity (not sure if I invented that word or not) would be Fred and UC, discussing Giano's latest ""misdeed"", and the outside chance (VERY outside) that he might be admitted to the August body... (That's all I got for now.) ??? " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OOOOOOOH TEABAG
OOOOOOOOOOH YER BECAUSE I DID
OH YER
OH YA
OH YES
BECAUSE I DID
WOAH
TEABAGGED | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Whoa that's even more ambitious! p i prefer to contribute little by little at my snail pace. i'd love to answer short and focused questions if anyone has them, or to make small corrections or improvements here and there, but to venture into something of that scale is off limit for my extent of knowledge as well as real-life schedule now. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- Ryda Wong is an asshole vandaliser | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
COI concerns
Simply put after relentless questioning, including repeating same question over and over again, to the point of harassment, I decided to try to figure out your POV through your list of contributions. If I'd seen your edits were all very pro-Israel, I'd have one viewpoint. If I saw they were all anti-Irish, I'd have another. But when I went to your contributions page, low and behold most of your articles are related to S&M;, including involving women. Just looking at a few pages, it's not like your POV is ""these are disgusting.""
So I have to wonder if you are financially benefiting yourself by engaging in a little written free sadism against a female, something which you'd have to pay quite a bit of money per hour for, even if you just did it online with someone who specializes in that kind of sex work. So I've brought it up here per WP:COI policy. " | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
"
what is that page like your puppet or something
Why are you not willing to debate that fact at Hardcore Punk . Motorhead at a Minimum is NWOBHM. WHERE DO YOU THINK THE ""HEAVY"" CAME FROM . Thin air . HARD ROCK and EARLY METAL Combined with Punk Rock is Hardcore. Not totally in 1979 but from 1982 With Battalion Of Saints at a Minimum Up Til NOW. So all of a sudden that page shows up no other editing more or less except HC. Did either of you even have a career in HC . Do you think you ""won"" the page . Is That Your Sock Puppet. Its going to be investigated . Glad you got involved. Duh. What does this mean to You.... ""it took the previous punk sound and added the incessant, heavy drumbeats and distorted guitar sound of New Wave of British Heavy Metal bands, especially Motörhead.[69]"" That is On the actual page . So basically you don't care if its wrong. hardcore didn't just happen"" out of thin air. Its a HYBRID. 68.39.152.45 " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
As DVD Verdict has been found notable Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DVD Verdict, the (negative) reception point may remain. Thanks, | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
At the point you've smoked yourself into a tard ..... | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
You know somebody's just won it, don't you?
Make sure that's mentioned - http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/showbiz/tm_headline=jackpot-winner-is-real-deal&method;=full&objectid;=18103193&siteid;=94762-name_page.html | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ok Thanks, I appreciate that. I will look into it. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The information that I removed was incorrect, as I mentioned in my (previous) edit summary.
You need to demonstrate WHY you think the information is incorrect by citing your sources. I'd appreciate it if you would learn how to post messages to user pages properly as well. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hi! I'm still not sure I understand. Is the Deletion message saying that the Wikipedia image will be deleted (which is no bother to me because the Commons image remains)? Presumably then I can ignore such messages in the future? Thanks for writing - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Because no-one has shown that you cease to be married if you move to or live in one of the other counties. If only eight counties had DMV offices, that wouldn't mean you couldn't drive across the whole state. — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Nope, not going to stop editing it. I'm not breaking any rules and if you try anything, I will report you to the admins. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
I am being slandered and defamed by Delicious Carbuncle, but obviously 'blueboy96' does not want to admit it.
I feel like Deja Vu, like being in a movie which I have seen many years ago: !984 by George Orwell.
This is absolutely shockingthe unfairness and edits in bad faith. Please see what Delicious Carbuncle has edited and then quickly erased. She is Pauline Berry. She gave herself away and now she is continue to Wiki stalk me and to slander and harass. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Definitely Brother Blood. I mean, is he not after her every reincarnation? Even going so far as to making a new body AND bring out hell? Please. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
I think Wintersdoor needs to examine this subpage of mine: , especially the quotes from Marcia Angell, Stephen Barrett, Michael Baum, Robert Todd Carroll, and Richard Dawkins. BTW guys, I would appreciate some help in getting this subpage fit for mainspace. Please visit its talkpage.
Otherwise, I agree that his comments need to be made at Talk:Naturopathic medicine. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on , or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! ·Talk
April 2008
Please would you stop changing the article which appears to be about yourself in the manner im which you are doing. Wikipedia has very clear guidelines about how articles should be constructed and whilst you are clearly trying to improve the article, unfortunately you are doing exactly the opposite and you are removing valid formatting and content. You should not for example remove the bolding of your name nor the references. I am more than happy to help you improve the article but would ask you not to revert the article again in the same format. I will work on it now to add the content you are adding, but in the correct format. Thank you.·Talk " | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Your Beautiful wife | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks
I thank-you for informing me. It is most refreshing to see not all editors lack moral fibre, nor good manners. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I've sourced the reversion. It should be noted that Hamidullah uses the Gregorian calendar, so there is a discrepancy between his dates and the way they are quoted in Wikipedia which, per the Manual of Style, converts them to Julian. 213.123.194.188 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
making false allegations to mislead, and | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.